Dodecaindane (tBu3Si)8In12—A Compound with an In12 Deltapolyhedron Framework

A unique feature among polyhedron frameworks of boron group elements is exhibited by the In₁₂ framework of the black-violet dodecaindane R^*₈In₁₂ (R*=SitBu₃), which can be obtained by the thermolysis of R^*₂In−InR^*₂. The molecular structure of R^*₈In₁₂ (tBu groups omitted in picture shown) can be described as a combination of two R^*₄In₆ octahedral building blocks and can thus be classified as a conjuncto dodecaindane.     

Nitric Oxide Insertion Reactivity with the Bismuth–Carbon Bond: Formation of the Oximate Anion, [ON(C6H2tBu2O)]−, from the Oxyaryl Dianion, (C6H2tBu2O)2−

The first example of NO insertion into a Bi?C bond has been found in the direct reaction of NO with a Bi³⁺ complex of the unusual (C₆H₂tBu₂‐3,5‐O‐4)^2? oxyaryl dianionic ligand, namely, Ar′Bi(C₆H₂tBu₂‐3,5‐O‐4) [Ar′=2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃] ( 1 ). The oximate complexes [Ar′Bi(ONC₆H₂‐3,5‐tBu₂‐4‐O)]₂(μ‐O) ( 3 ) and Ar′Bi(ONC₆H₂‐3,5‐tBu₂‐4‐O)₂ ( 4 ) were formed as a mixture, but can be isolated in pure form by reaction of NO with a Bi³⁺ complex of the [O₂C(C₆H₂tBu₂‐3‐5‐O‐4]^2? oxyarylcarboxy dianion, namely, Ar′Bi[O₂C(C₆H₂tBu₂‐3‐5‐O‐4)‐κ²O,O’]. Reaction of 1 with Ph₃CSNO gave an oximate product with (Ph₃CS)^1? as an ancillary ligand, (Ph₃CS)(Ar′)Bi(ONC₆H₂‐3,5‐tBu₂‐4‐O) ( 5 ).     

Reactions of 1,2-catechol with Bu3M (M = Ga, In). Structures of intermediate products

Reactions of 1,2-catechol with ^tBu₃M (M = Ga, In) have been studied. Trinuclear compounds [^tBu₅M₃(OC₆H₄O)₂] [M = Ga (1), M = In (2)] were synthesised in the reaction of 2 equiv. of C₆H₄(OH)₂ with 3 equiv. of ^tBu₃M in refluxing solvents. At room temperature the reaction of 1,2-catechol with ^tBu₃In in Et₂O leads to the formation of a binuclear complex [^tBu₄In₂(OC₆H₄OH)₂ · 2Et₂O] (3) possessing a four-membered In₂O₂ core and two unreacted hydroxyl groups. The same reaction carried out in a non-coordinating solvent (CH₂Cl₂) results in formation a compound [^tBu₃In₂(OC₆H₄O)(OC₆H₄OH)] (4), which undergoes a reaction with ^tBu₃In to yield the product 2. Moreover two intermediate isomeric products 5 and 6 of formula [^tBu₃Ga₂(OC₆H₄O)(OC₆H₄OH)] were isolated from the post-reaction mixture of 1,2-catechol with ^tBu₃Ga. The compound 6 possessing a different coordination of gallium atoms than 5 is a result of the intramolecular rearrangement of the compound 5 to decrease the steric repultion between ligands. Compounds 3 and 6 were structurally characterised. According to the structure of intermediate products 3-6 a reaction pathway of 1,2-catechols with group 13 metal trialkyls was proposed.     

Reaktionen von (tBu)2P?PP(Br)tBu2 mit LiP(SiMe3)2, LiPMe2 und LiMe,LitBu, LinBu

Reactions of (tBu)₂P? P?P(Br)tBu₂ with LiP(SiMe₃)₂, LiPMe₂ and LiMe, LitBu and LinBu The reactions of (tBu)₂P? P?P(Br)tBu₂ 1 with LiP(SiMe₃)₂ 2 yield (Me₃Si)₂P? P(SiMe₃)₂ 4 and P[P(tBu)₂]₂P(SiMe₃)₂ 5 , whereas 1 with LiPMe₂ 2 yields P₂Me₄ 6 and P[(tBu)₂]₂PMe₂ 7 . 1 with LiMe yields the ylid tBu₂P? P?P(Me)tBu₂ (main product) and [tBu₂P]₂PMe 15 . In the reaction of 1 with tBuLi [tBu₂P]₂PH 11 is the main product and also tBuP? P?P(R)tBu₂ 21 is formed. The reaction of 1 with nBuLi leads to [tBu₂P]₂PnBu 17 (main product) and tBu₂P? P?P(nBu)tBu₂ 22 (secondary product).     

Reversible Carbene Insertion into a Ge−N Bond and Insights into CO and Carbene Substitution Reactions Involving Amidinatogermylenes and Fischer Carbene Complexes

The formation of the five-membered-ring germylene complexes [M(CO)₅{Ge(tBu₂bzamC(OEt)Me)tBu}] ( 3_M ; M=Cr, W), which occurs readily at room temperature from the germylene Ge(tBu₂bzam)tBu ( 1 _{t Bu} ) and Fischer carbenes [M(CO)₅{C(OEt)Me}] ( 2_M ; M=Cr, W), has been found to be reversible. Upon heating at 60 °C, complexes 3_M undergo epimerization to an equilibrium mixture of 3_M and 3′_M . At that temperature, the chromium epimers (but not the tungsten ones) release CO to end in the mixed germylene–Fischer carbene complexes [Cr(CO)₄{C(OEt)Me}{Ge(tBu₂bzam)tBu}] (cis- 4_Cr and trans- 4_Cr ). The latter decompose at 120 °C to [Cr(CO)₅{Ge(tBu₂bzam)tBu}] ( 6_Cr ). Because the formation of cis- 4_Cr and trans- 4_Cr from 3_Cr or 3′_Cr requires the presence of free 1 _{t Bu} and 2_Cr in the reaction solutions, the reactions of 1 _{t Bu} with 2_M to give 3_M (and 3′_M at 60 °C) should be reversible. This proposal has been proven by germylene-exchange crossover reactions in which free 1 _{t Bu} and [M(CO)₅{Ge(tBu₂bzamC(OEt)Me)CH₂SiMe₃}] ( 5′_M ; M=Cr, W) were formed when complexes 3_M were treated at room temperature with the germylene Ge(tBu₂bzam)CH₂SiMe₃ ( 1_tmsm ). A clear differential behavior between N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) and amidinatogermylenes ( 1 _{t Bu} and 1_tmsm ) in their reactivity against group 6 metal Fischer carbene complexes is demonstrated. The higher electron-donor capacity of amidinatogermylenes with respect to NHCs and the bias of the former to get involved in ring expansion processes are responsible for this differential behavior.     

Reactivity of Xantphos-Type Rhodium Complexes Towards SF4: SF3 Versus SF2 Complex Generation

S−F-bond activation of sulfur tetrafluoride at [Rh(Cl)(^tBuxanPOP)] ( 1 ; ^tBuxanPOP=9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis-(di-tert-butylphosphino)-xanthene) led to the formation of the cationic complex [Rh(F)(Cl)(SF₂)(^tBuxanPOP)][SF₅] ( 2 a ) together with trans-[Rh(Cl)(F)₂(^tBuxanPOP)] ( 3 ) and cis-[Rh(Cl)₂(F)(^tBuxanPOP)] ( 4 ) which both could also be obtained by the reaction of SF₅Cl with 1 . In contrast to that, the conversion of SF₄ at the methyl complex [Rh(Me)(^tBuxanPOP)] ( 5 ) gave the isolable and room-temperature stable cationic λ⁴-trifluorosulfanyl complex [Rh(Me)(SF₃)(^tBuxanPOP)][SF₅] ( 6 ). Treatment of 6 with the Lewis acids BF₃ or AsF₅ produced the dicationic difluorosulfanyl complex [Rh(Me)(SF₂)(^tBuxanPOP)][BF₄]₂ ( 8 a ) or [Rh(Me)(SF₂)(^tBuxanPOP)][AsF₆]₂ ( 8 b ), respectively. Refluorination of 8 a was possible with the use of dimethylamine giving [Rh(Me)(SF₃)(^tBuxanPOP)][BF₄] ( 9 ). A reaction of 6 with trichloroisocyanuric acid (TClCA) gave the fluorido complex [Rh(F)(Cl)(SF₂)(^tBuxanPOP)][Cl] ( 2 b ) together with chloromethane and SF₅Cl.     

Verbindungen des Germainums und Zinns. 17. Alkylarylstannylen-Komplexe des Chroms und Molybdäns ohne Donorstabilisierung

Compounds of Germanium and Tin. 17 [1]. Alkylarylstannylene Complexes of Chromium and Molybdenum without Donor Stabilization Reaction of the complexes [(OC)₅M(THF)], M = Cr, Mo, with the alkylarylstannylene RR′Sn: R = 2,4,6-tBu₃C₆H₂, R′ = CH₂C(CH₃)₂-3,5-tBu₂C₆H₂, provides the donor-free stannylene complexes [(OC)₅Cr?SnRR′] ( 6 ) and [(OC)₅Mo?SnRR′] ( 8 ), respectively. The X-ray structure analyses of the isotypic compounds 6 and 8 reveal the three coordinate tin atoms in strictly planar environments and acute CSnC angles of 91.2° ( 6 ) and 91.3° ( 8 ).     

Zur Polymorphie von In5Br7

On the Polymorphism of In₅Br₇ The existence of two polymorphs of In₅Br₇ has been proved by single crystal structure determinations. In₅Br₇ (tP192) crystallizes with the tetragonal space group P4₁2₁2 and lattice parameters a_t = 1318.9(5) pm and c_t = 3723.8(9) pm (293 K). Concerning monoclinic In₅Br₇ (mC192), the centrosymmetric space group C2/c with lattice parameters a_m = 1867.3(4) pm, b_m=1867.0(5) pm, c_m = 1918.0(7) pm, and β_m = 103.96(2)° (293 K) has been confirmed. Both modifications of In₅Br₇ are built up from layers of the same type. These layers with a thickness of about 930 pm consist of structure fragments [InBr₂]⁴⁺ and [InBr₁₂]^4–. The anion is composed of two ethan‐like [InBr₆]^2– units, which contain In–In bonds. The stacking sequence of the layers with symmetry C 1 2 (1) differs for the two modifications of In₅Br₇. The tetragonal form is generated by applying a 4₁ screw axis; the monoclinic polymorph is formed by introducing inversion centers between the layers. The adequate name of In₅Br₇ = In[InBr₆]Br is triindium(I)‐hexabromodiindate(II)(In–In)‐bromide.     

Die Reaktion von tBu2P‐P=P(Me)tBu2 mit [Fe2(CO)9] und [(η2‐C8H14)2Fe(CO)3]

^tBu₂P‐P=P(Me)^tBu₂ reacts with [Fe₂(CO)₉] to give [μ‐(1, 2, 3:4‐η‐^tBu₂P¹‐P²‐P³‐P^4tBu₂){Fe(CO)₃}{Fe(CO)₄}] ( 1 ) and [trans‐(^tBu₂MeP)₂Fe(CO)₃]( 2 ). With [(η²‐C₈H₁₄)₂Fe(CO)₃] in addition to [μ‐(1, 2, 3:4‐η‐^tBu₂P¹‐P²‐P³‐P^4tBu₂){Fe(CO)₂PMe^tBu₂}‐{Fe(CO)₄}] ( 10 ) and 2 also [(μ‐P^tBu₂){μ‐P‐Fe(CO)₃‐PMe^tBu₂}‐{Fe(CO)₃}₂(Fe‐Fe)]( 9 ) is formed. 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a = 875.0(2), b = 1073.2(2), c = 3162.6(6) pm and β = 94.64(3)?. 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a = 1643.4(7), b = 1240.29(6), c = 2667.0(5) pm and β = 97.42(2)?. 9 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n with a = 1407.5(5), b = 1649.7(5), c = 1557.9(16) pm and β = 112.87(2)?.     

Synthesis and reactivity of alkynyl-linked phosphonium borates

The phosphine tBu₂PC?CH ( 1 ) was reacted with B(C₆F₅) to give the zwitterionic species tBu₂P(H)C?CB(C₆F₅)₃ ( 2 ). The analogous species tBu₂P(Me)C?CB(C₆F₅)₃ ( 3 ), tBu₂P(H)C?CB(Cl)(C₆F₅)₂ ( 4 ), tBu₂P(H)C?CB(H)(C₆F₅)₂ ( 5 ), and tBu₂P(Me)C?CB(H)(C₆F₅) ₂ ( 6 ) were also prepared. The salt [tBu₂P(H)C?CB(C₆F₅)₂(THF)][B(C₆F₅)₄] ( 7 ) was prepared through abstraction of hydride by [Ph₃C][B(C₆F₅)₄]. Species 5 reacted with the imine tBuN?CHPh to give the borane–amine adduct tBu₂PC?CB[tBuN(H)CH₂Ph](C₆F₅)₂ ( 8 ). The related phosphine Mes₂PC?CH ( 9 ; Mes=C₆H₂Me₃) was used to prepare [tBu₃PH][Mes₂PC?CB(C₆F₅)₃] ( 10 ) and generate Mes₂PC?CB(C₆F₅)₂. The adduct Mes₂PC?CB(NCMe)(C₆F₅)₂ ( 11 ) was isolated. Reaction of Mes₂PC?CB(C₆F₅)₂ with H₂ gave the zwitterionic product (C₆F₅)₂(H)BC(H)?C[P(H)Mes₂][(C₆F₅)₂BC?CP(H)Mes₂] ( 12 ). Reaction of tBu₂PC?CB(C₆F₅)₂, a phosphine–borane generated in situ from 5 , with 1‐hexene gave the species [tBu₂PC?CB(C₆F₅)₂](CH₂CHnBu)[tBu₂PC?CB(C₆F₅)₂] ( 13 ) and subsequent reaction with methanol or hexene resulted in the formation of [tBu₂P(H)C?CB(C₆F₅)₂](CH₂CHnBu)[tBu₂PC?CB(C₆F₅)₂](OMe) ( 14 ) or the macrocycle {[tBu₂PC?CB(C₆F₅)₂](CH₂CH₂nBu)}₂ ( 15 ), respectively. In a related fashion, the reaction of 13 with THF afforded the macrocycle [tBu₂PC?CB(C₆F₅)₂](CH₂CHnBu)[tBu₂PC?CB(C₆F₅)₂][O(CH₂)₄] ( 16 ), although treatment of tBu₂PC?CB(C₆F₅)₂ with THF lead to the formation of {[tBu₂PC?CB(C₆F₅)₂][O(CH₂)₄]}₂ ( 17 ). In a related example, the reaction of Mes₂PC?CB(C₆F₅)₂ with PhC?CH gave {[Mes₂PC?CB(C₆F₅)₂](CH?CPh)}₂ ( 18 ). Compound 5 reacted with AlX₃ (X=Cl, Br) to give addition to the alkynyl unit, affording (C₆F₅)₂BC(H)?C[P(H)tBu₂](AlX₃) (X=Cl 19 , Br 20 ). In a similar fashion, 5 reacted with [Zn(C₆F₅)₂] ? C₇H₈, [Al(C₆F₅)₃] ? C₇H₈, or HB(C₆F₅)₂ to give (C₆F₅)₃BC(H)?C[P(H)tBu₂][Zn(C₆F₅)] ( 21 ), (C₆F₅)₃BC(H)?C[P(H)tBu₂][Al(C₆F₅)₂] ( 22 ), or [(C₆F₅)₂B]₂HC?CH[P(H)tBu₂] ( 23 ), respectively. The implications of this reactivity are discussed.     

Offenkettige und cyclische As‐funktionalisierte Stannylarsine: Darstellung,Reaktionen und Struktur

Open‐Chain and Cyclic As‐functionalized Stannylarsines: Synthesis, Reactions, and Structure ^tBu₃SnAsH₂ ( 1 ) reacts with MeLi to form the lithium compound ^tBu₃SnAsHLi which reacts with ^tBu₂SnCl₂ to give the AsH‐functionalized bis(arsino)stannane ^tBu₂Sn(AsHSn^tBu₃)₂ ( 2 ). Metallation of diarsadistannetane (^tBu₂SnAsH)₂ ( 3 ) with two equivalents of ^tBuLi yields the dilithio compound (^tBu₂SnAsLi)₂ which reacts with Me₃SiCl or Me₃SnCl to give the corresponding As,As′‐bis‐substituted diarsadistannetanes (^tBu₂SnAsSiMe₃)₂ ( 4 ) and (^tBu₂SnAsSnMe₃)₂ ( 5 ), respectively. The novel compounds are characterized by NMR (¹H, ¹¹⁹Sn) and mass spectroscopy, ring compounds 4 and 5 further by X‐ray structure analysis. In the solid state both ring compounds contain molecules with planar tin‐arsenic rings and two trans‐configurated Me₃Si‐ or Me₃Sn‐ring substituents (space group P2₁/n (No. 14), Z = 2).     

Die Bildung von [(tBu)2P]2P?P[P(tBu)2]2 aus LiP[P(tBu)2]2 und 1,2-Dibromethan. Die Thermolyse von tBu2P?PP(Br)tBu2

[(tBu)₂P]₂P? P[P(tBu)₂]₂ from LiP[P(tBu)₂]₂ and 1,2-Dibromomethane. Pyrolysis of tBu₂P? P?P(Br)tBu₂ All products of the reaction of [tBu₂P]₂PLi 1 with 1,2-dibromoethane 2 were investigated. Already at ?70°C tBu₂P? P?P(Br)tBu₂ 3 as main product and [tBu₂P]₂PBr 4 are formed. Only with an excess of 1 also [tBu₂P]P? P[P(tBu)₂]₂ 5 is obtained. Warming of a pure solution of 3 in toluene from ?70°C to ?30°C leads to 4 , and at 20°C tBu₂PBr and the cyclophosphanes P₄[P(tBu)₂]₄ and P₃[P(tBu)₂]₃ are observed. 5 does not result from 3 , it's rather a byproduct from the reaction of 1 with 4 . Also the ylide 3 and 1 yields 5 .     

Tuning main group redox chemistry through steric loading: subvalent Group 13 metal complexes of carbazolyl ligands

The ability of substituted carbazol‐9‐yl systems to ligate in σ fashion through the amido N‐donor, or to adopt alternative coordination modes through the π system of the central five‐membered ring, can be tuned by systematic variation in the steric demands of substituents in the 1‐ and 8‐positions. The differing affinities of the two modes of coordination for hard and soft metal centres can be shown to influence not only cation selectivity, but also the redox properties of the metal centre. Thus, the highly sterically sterically demanding 1,3,6,8‐tetra‐tert‐butylcarbazolyl ligand can be used to generate the structurally characterised amido‐indium(I) complex, [{(tBu₄carb)In}_n], (together with its isostructural thallium counterpart) in which the metal centre interacts with the central pyrrolyl ring in η³ fashion [d(In? N)=2.679(3) Å; d(In? C)=2.819(3), 2.899(3) Å]. By contrast, the smaller 3,6‐di‐tert‐butylcarbazolyl system is less able to restrict the metal centre from binding at the anionic nitrogen donor in the plane of the carbazolyl ligand (i.e. in σ fashion). Analogous chemistry with In^I precursors therefore leads to disproportionation to the much harder In^II [and In⁰], and the formation of the mixed‐valence product, [In₂{In₂(tBu₂carb)₆}], a homoleptic molecular [In₄(NR₂)₆] system. This chemistry reveals a flexibility of ligation for carbazolyl systems that contrasts markedly with that of the similarly sterically encumbered terphenyl ligand family.     

A Dicationic Organoplatinum(II) Complex Containing a Bridging 2,5‐Bis‐(4‐ethynylphenyl)‐[1,3,4]oxadiazole Ligand Behaves as a Phosphorescent Gelator for Organic Solvents

A dicationic platinum(II) terpyridyl complex, [(tBu₃tpy)Pt(OXD)Pt(tBu₃tpy)](PF₆)₂ (tBu₃tpy=4,4′,4“‐tri‐tert‐butyl‐2,2′:6′,2”‐terpyridyl, OXD=2,5‐bis(4‐ethynylphenyl)[1,3,4]oxadiazole) formed phosphorescent organogels in acetonitrile or in a mixture of acetonitrile and alcohol. The structure and properties of these emissive gels were analyzed by polarizing optical and confocal laser scanning microscopy, and by variable‐temperature ¹H NMR, UV/Vis, and emission spectroscopy. Dry gels were studied by scanning electron microscopy, powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD), and small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS). SEM images of the dry gel revealed a network of interwoven nanofibers (diameter 12–60 nm, length>5 μm). Intermolecular π–π interactions between the [(tBu₃tpy)PtC≡C] moieties could be deduced from the variable ¹H NMR spectra. The PXRD and SAXS data showed that the assembly of the gelator could be represented by a rectangular 2D lattice of 68 Å × 14 Å. The ability of the complex to gelate a number of organic solvents is most likely due to intermolecular π–π interactions between the [(tBu₃tpy)PtC≡C] moieties.     

Syntheses of Molybdenum and Tungsten Imido Alkylidene Complexes that Contain a Bidentate Oxo/Thiolato Ligand

3,3′,5,5′-Tetra-tert-butyl-2′-sulfanyl[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-ol (H₂[^tBu₄OS]) was prepared in 24 % yield overall from the analogous biphenol using standard techniques. Addition of H₂[^tBu₄OS] to Mo(NAr)(CHCMe₂Ph)(2,5-dimethylpyrrolide)₂ led to formation of Mo(NAr)(CHCMe₂Ph)[^tBu₄OS], which was trapped with PMe₃ to give Mo(NAr)(CHCMe₂Ph)[^tBu₄OS](PMe₃) ( 1 (PMe₃)). An X-ray crystallographic study of 1 (PMe₃) revealed that two structurally distinct square pyramidal molecules are present in which the alkylidene ligand occupies the apical position in each. Both 1 (PMe₃)_A and 1 (PMe₃)_B are disordered. Mo(NAd)(CHCMe₂Ph)(^tBu₄OS)(PMe₃) ( 2 (PMe₃); Ad=1-adamantyl) and W(NAr)(CHCMe₂Ph)(^tBu₄OS)(PMe₃) ( 3 (PMe₃)) were prepared using analogous approaches. 1 (PMe₃) reacts with ethylene (1 atm) in benzene within 45 minutes to give an ethylene complex Mo(NAr)(^tBu₄OS)(C₂H₄) ( 4 ) that is isolable and relatively stable toward loss of ethylene below 60 °C. An X-ray study shows that the bond distances and angles for the ethylene ligand in 4 are like those found for bisalkoxide ethylene complexes of the same general type. Complex 1 (PMe₃) in the presence of one equivalent of B(C₆F₅)₃ catalyzes the homocoupling of 1-decene, allyltrimethylsilane, and allylboronic acid pinacol ester at ambient temperature. 1 (PMe₃), 2 (PMe₃), and 3 (PMe₃) all catalyze the ROMP of rac-endo,exo-5,6-dicarbomethoxynorbornene (rac-DCMNBE) in the presence of B(C₆F₅)₃, but the polyDCMNBE that is formed has a random structure.     

[Co4P2(PtBu2)2(CO)8] und [{Co(CO)3}2P4tBu4] aus Co2(CO)8 und tBu2P–P=P(Me)tBu2

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XIX. [Co₄P₂(P^tBu₂)₂(CO)₈] and [{Co(CO)₃}₂P₄^tBu₄] from Co₂(CO)₈ and ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ Co₂(CO)₈ reacts with ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ yielding the compounds [Co₄P₂(P^tBu₂)₂(CO)₈] ( 1 ) and [{η^2tBu₂P=P–P=P^tBu₂}{Co(CO)₃}₂] ( 2 a ) cis, ( 2 b ) trans. In 1 , four Co and two P atoms form a tetragonal bipyramid, in which two adjacent Co atoms are μ₂‐bridged by ^tBu₂P groups. Additionally, two CO groups are linked to each Co atom. In 2 a and 2 b , each of the Co(CO)₃ units is η²‐coordinated to the terminal P₂ units resulting in the cis‐ and trans‐configurations 2 a and 2 b . 1 crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pnnm (No. 58) with a = 879,41(5), b = 1199,11(8), c = 1773,65(11) pm. 2 a crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n (No. 14) with a = 875,97(5), b = 1625,36(11), c = 2117,86(12) pm, β = 91,714(7)°. 2 b crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 (No. 2) with a = 812,00(10), b = 843,40(10), c = 1179,3(2) pm, α = 100,92(2)°, β = 102,31(2)°, γ = 102,25(2)°.     

Formation and Reactivity of an Aluminabenzene Ligand at Pentadienyl‐Supported Rare‐Earth Metals

The half‐open rare‐earth‐metal aluminabenzene complexes [(1‐Me‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₅H₃Al)(μ‐Me)Ln(2,4‐dtbp)] (Ln=Y, Lu) are accessible via a salt metathesis reaction employing Ln(AlMe₄)₃ and K(2,4‐dtbp). Treatment of the yttrium complex with B(C₆F₅)₃ and tBuCCH gives access to the pentafluorophenylalane complex [{1‐(C₆F₅)‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₅H₃Al}{μ‐C₆F₅}Y{2,4‐dtbp}] and the mixed vinyl acetylide complex [(2,4‐dtbp)Y(μ‐η¹:η³‐2,4‐tBu₂‐C₅H₄)(μ‐CCtBu)AlMe₂], respectively.     

tBu2P?PP(X)tBu2-Ylide (X = Cl,Br, I) durch Halogenierung von [tBu2P]2P?SiMe3

tBu₂P? P?P(X)tBu₂ Ylides (X = Cl, Br, I) by Halogenation of [tBu₂P]₂P? SiMe₃ [tBu₂P]₂P? SiMe₃ 1 with halogenating agents as Br₂, I₂, Br-succinimide, CCl₄, CBr₄, CI₄ or C₂Cl₆ via cleavage of the Si? P bond in 1 produces the ylides tBu₂P? P?P(X)tBu₂ (X = Cl, Br, I). This proceeds independent from the formerly known pathway – [tBu₂P]₂PLi + 1,2-dibromoethane – and shows that the Li-phosphide must not be present as a necessary requirement for the formation of ylides.     

Unexpected Silaazetidine Formation in the Thermolysis of thf‐Supported Silanimine Et2Si=N–SitBu3·thf

The silyl amide Et₂SiCl‐NLi‐SitBu₃ can be cleanly prepared from precursor silylamine Et₂SiCl‐NH‐SitBu₃ and Li[nBu]. The CF₃SO₃SiMe₃ induced LiCl elimination of Et₂SiCl‐NLi‐SitBu₃ in thf afforded a 2‐silaazetidine derivative by [2+2] cycloaddition of Et₂Si=N–SitBu₃ with Et₂Si(OCH=CH₂)–NH–SitBu₃. X‐ray quality crystals of this 2‐silaazetidine derivative (triclinic, space group P$\bar{1}$ ) were grown from benzene at room temperature. The starting material for this approach, Et₂SiCl–NH–SitBu₃, is water‐sensitive. Hydrolysis of Et₂SiCl‐NH‐SitBu₃ gave [tBu₃SiNH₃]Cl along with (Et₂SiO)_n oligomers. The hydro chloride [tBu₃SiNH₃]Cl could be isolated and was characterized by X‐ray crystallography (trigonal, space group P$\bar{3}$ ).     

The Reactions of Carbon Monoxide with Silyl and Silenyl Lithium – Synthesis and Isolation of the First Stable Tetra‐Silyl Di‐Ketyl Biradical and 1‐Silaallenolate Lithium

Reactions of carbon monoxide (CO) with tBu₂MeSiLi and (E)‐(tBu₂MeSi)(tBuMe₂Si)C=Si(SiMetBu₂)Li?2 THF ( 4 ) were studied both experimentally and computationally. Reaction of tBu₂MeSiLi with CO in hexane yields the first stable tetra‐silyl di‐ketyl biradical [(tBu₂MeSi)₂COLi]^.₂ ( 3 ). Reaction of 4 with CO yields selectively and quantitatively the first reported 1‐silaallenolate, (tBu₂MeSi)(tBuMe₂Si)C=C=Si(SiMetBu₂)OLi?THF ( 5 ). Both 3 and 5 were characterized by X‐ray crystallography and biradical 3 also by EPR spectroscopy. Silaallenolate 5 reacts with Me₃SiCl to produce siloxy substituted 1‐silaallene (tBu₂MeSi)(tBuMe₂Si)C=C=Si(SiMetBu₂)OSiMe₃. The reaction of 4 with CO provides a new route to 1‐silaallenes. The mechanisms of the reactions of tBuMe₂SiLi and of 4 with CO were studied by DFT calculations.