Uranyl(VI) complexes of [O,N,O,N′]-type diaminobis(phenolate) ligands: Syntheses,structures and extraction studies

The syntheses and crystal structures of four new uranyl complexes with [O,N,O,N′]-type ligands are described. The reaction between uranyl nitrate hexahydrate and the phenolic ligand [(N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)-N′,N′-dimethylethylenediamine)], H₂L1 in a 1:2 molar ratio (M to L), yields a uranyl complex with the formula [UO₂(HL1)(NO₃)] · CH₃CN (1). In the presence of a base (triethylamine, one mole per ligand mole) with the same molar ratio, the uranyl complex [UO₂(HL1)₂] (2) is formed. The reaction between uranyl nitrate hexahydrate and the ligand [(N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-di-t-butylbenzyl)-N′,N′-dimethylethylenediamine)], H₂L2, yields a uranyl complex with the formula [UO₂(HL2)(NO₃)] · 2CH₃CN (3) and the ligand [N-(2-pyridylmethyl)-N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)amine], H₂L3, in the presence of a base yields a uranyl complex with the formula [UO₂(HL3)₂] · 2CH₃CN (4). The molecular structures of 1–4 were verified by X-ray crystallography. The complexes 1–4 are zwitter ions with a neutral net charge. Compounds 1 and 3 are rare neutral mononuclear [UO₂(HLn)(NO₃)] complexes with the nitrate bonded in η²-fashion to the uranyl ion. Furthermore, the ability of the ligands H₂L1–H₂L4 to extract the uranyl ion from water to dichloromethane, and the selectivity of extraction with ligands H₂L1, H₃L5 (N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)-3-amino-1-propanol), H₂L6 · HCl (N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-5-tert-butyl-3-methylbenzyl)-1-aminobutane · HCl) and H₃L7 · HCl (N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-5-tert-butyl-3-methylbenzyl)-6-amino-1-hexanol · HCl) under varied chemical conditions were studied. As a result, the most efficient and selective ligand for uranyl ion extraction proved to be H₃L7 · HCl.     

Syntheses and structures of two new uranyl complexes [UO2(DPDPU)2(NO3)2](C6H5CH3) and [UO2(PMBP)2(DPDPU)](CH3C6H4CH3)0.5

Two new uranyl complexes [UO₂(DPDPU)₂(NO₃)₂](C₆H₅CH₃) (1) and [UO₂(PMBP)₂ (DPDPU)](CH₃C₆H₄CH₃)_0.5 (2), (DPDPU?=?N,N′-dipropyl-N,N′-diphenylurea, HPMBP?= 1-phenyl-3-methyl-4-benzoyl-pyrazolone-5) were synthesized and characterized. The coordination geometry of the uranyl atom in 1 is distorted hexagonal bipyramidal, coordinated by two oxygen atoms of two DPDPU molecules and four oxygen atoms of two bidentate nitrate groups. The coordination geometry of the uranyl atom in 2 is distorted pentagonal bipyramidal, coordinated by one oxygen atom of one DPDPU molecule and four oxygen atoms of two chelating PMBP molecules.     

Uranyl ion complexes with long chain aminoalcoholbis(phenolate) [O,N,O,O′] donor ligands

The reaction between uranyl nitrate hexahydrate and phenolic ligand precursor [(N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)-4-amino-1-butanol) · HCl], H₃L1 · HCl, leads to a uranyl complex [UO₂(H₂L1)₂] (1a) and [UO₂(H₂L1)₂] · 2CH₃CN (1b). The ligand [(N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-5-tert-butyl-3-methylbenzyl)-4-amino-1-butanol)H₃L2 · HCl], H₃L2 · HCl, yields a uranyl complex with a formula [UO₂(H₂L2)₂] · CH₃CN (2). The ligand [(N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)-5-amino-1-pentanol) · HCl], H₃L3 · HCl, produces a uranyl complex with a formula [UO₂(H₂L3)₂] · 2CH₃CN (3) and the ligand [(N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-5-tert-butyl-3-methylbenzyl)-5-amino-1-pentanol) · HCl], H₃L4 · HCl, leads to a uranyl complex with a formula [UO₂(H₂L4)₂] · 2CH₃CN (4). The ligand [(N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-5-tert-butyl-3-methylbenzyl)-6-amino-1-hexanol) · HCl], H₃L5 · HCl, leads to a uranyl complex with a formula [UO₂(H₂L5)₂] · 4toluene (5). The complexes 1–5 are obtained using a molar ratio of 1:2 (U to L) in the presence of a base (triethylamine). The molecular structures of 1a, 1b, 3, 4 and 5 were verified by X-ray crystallography. All complexes are neutral zwitterions and have similar centrosymmetric, mononuclear, distorted octahedral uranyl structures with the four coordinating phenoxo ligands in an equatorial plane. In uranyl ion extraction studies from water to dichloromethane with ligands H₃L1 · HCl–H₃L5 · HCl, ligands H₃L1 · HCl, H₃L4 · HCl and H₃L5 · HCl are the most effective ones.     

Synthesis,characterization, anticancer activity,thermal and electrochemical studies of some novel uranyl Schiff base complexes

Some tetradentate N₂O₂ Schiff base ligands, such as N,N′-bis(naphtalidene)-1,2-phenylenediamine, N,N′-bis(naphtalidene)-4-methyl-1,2-phenylenediamine, N,N′-bis(naphtalidene)-4-chloro-1,2-phenylenediamine, N,N′-bis(naphtalidene)-4-nitro-1,2-phenylenediamine, N,N′-bis(naphtalidene)-4-carboxyl-1,2-phenylenediamine, and their uranyl complexes were synthesized and characterized by ¹H NMR, IR, UV–Vis spectroscopy, TG (thermogravimetry), and elemental analysis (C.H.N.). Thermogravimetric analysis shows that uranyl complexes have very different thermal stabilities. This method is used also to establish that only one solvent molecule is coordinated to the central uranium ion and this solvent molecule does not coordinate strongly and is removed easier than the tetradentate ligand and also trans oxides. The electrochemical properties of the uranyl complexes were investigated by cyclic voltammetry. Electrochemistry of these complexes showed a quasireversible redox reaction without any successive reactions. Also, the kinetic parameters of thermal decomposition were calculated using Coats–Redfern equation. According to Coats–Redfern plots the kinetics of thermal decomposition of the studied complexes is first-order in all stages. Anticancer activity of the uranyl Schiff base complexes against cancer cell lines (Jurkat) was studied and determined by MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide) assay.     

A novel binuclear uranyl(VI) complex of bis(N,N′-3-carboxysalicylidene)-1,3-diaminopropan-2-ol: Synthesis, structure, and properties

A binuclear uranyl(VI) Schiff base complex of general formula [(UO₂)₂(H₂L)(OH)(DMSO)₂] · 2DMSO (I) (H₂L = trianion of bis(N,N??-3-carboxysalicylidene)-1,3-diaminopropan-2-ol) was synthesized and studied by ¹H NMR, UV-Vis, IR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography.     

Aminoalkylbis(phenolate) [O,N,O] donor ligands for uranyl(VI) ion coordination: Syntheses,structures, and extraction studies

The syntheses of five new aminoalkylbis(phenolate) ligands (as hydrochlorides) and their uranyl complexes are described. The reaction between uranyl nitrate hexahydrate and phenolic ligand [(N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-5-tert-butyl-3-methylbenzyl)-1-aminopropane) · HCl], H₂L1 · HCl, forms a uranyl complex [UO₂(HL1)₂] · 2CH₃CN (1). The ligand [(N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-5-tert-butyl-3-methylbenzyl)-1-aminobutane) · HCl], H₂L2 · HCl, forms a uranyl complex with a formula [UO₂(HL2)₂] · 2CH₃CN (2). The ligand [(N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-5-tert-butyl-3-methyl benzyl)-1-aminohexane) · HCl], H₂L3 · HCl, yields a uranyl complex with a formula [UO₂(HL3)₂] · 2CH₃CN (3) and the ligand [(N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-5-tert-butyl-3-methylbenzyl)-cyclohexylamine) · HCl], H₂L4 · HCl, yields a uranyl complex with a formula [UO₂(HL4)₂] (4). The ligand [(N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-5-tert-butyl-3-methylbenzyl)-benzylamine) · HCl], H₂L5 · HCl, forms a uranyl complex with a formula [UO₂(HL5)₂] · 2MeOH (5). The molecular structures of 1, 2′ (2 without methanol), 3, 4 and 5 were verified by X-ray crystallography. The complexes 1–5 are neutral zwitterions which form in a molar ratio of 1:2 (U to L) in the presence of a base (triethylamine) and bear similar mononuclear, distorted octahedral uranyl structures with the four coordinating phenoxo ligands forming an equatorial plane and resulting in a centrosymmetric structure for the uranyl ion. In uranyl ion extraction studies from water to dichloromethane with ligands H₂L1 · HCl–H₂L5 · HCl, the ligands H₂L2 · HCl and H₂L4 · HCl are the most effective ones.     

Synthesis and structures of two uranyl β-diketonate complexes [UO2(DBM)2(DEDPU)] and [UO2(PMBP)2(DEDPU)]

Two new uranyl β-diketonate complexes [UO₂(DBM)₂(DEDPU)] (1) and [UO₂(PMBP)₂(DEDPU)](CH₃C₆H₅)_0.5 (2), (HDBM?=?dibenzoylmethane, HPMBP?=?1-phenyl-3-methyl-4-benzoyl-5-pyrazolone, DEDPU?=?N,N′-diethyl-N,N′-diphenylurea) were synthesized and characterized. The coordination geometries of the uranyl atoms in 1 and 2 are distorted pentagonal bipyramidal, coordinated by one oxygen atom of DBDPU molecule and four oxygen atoms of two chelating DBM molecules in 1 and PMBP molecules in 2.     

Structure and composition of the polymeric products of UO2SO4 extraction by benzene solutions of uranyl bis(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate

UO₂SO₄ extracts obtained from neutral aqueous solutions of this compound and benzene solutions of uranyl bis(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate have been studied by³¹P NMR and IR spectroscopy. It has been found that in the presence of donor-active additions L=TBP or DOSO the recurrent unit of the polymer (UO₂X₂)_p adds one or two UO₂SO₄ molecules to form {UO₂X₂·UO₂SO₄·2L} and {UO₂X₂·2UO₂SO₄·6L} units. The structure of these units has been established. It has been shown that the distribution of UO₂SO₄ molecules along the polymer chain is random. Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences. Translated fromZhumal Struktumoi Khimii, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 682–689, July–August, 1995. Translated by L. Smolina     

Hexavalent uranium dicarboxylates with hydrazine. Preparation,characterization and thermal studies

The uranium complexes of composition,UO₂X⋅N₂H₄⋅H₂O, X=succinate or glutarate, UO₂X₂⋅N₂H₄⋅H₂O, X=Hadipate, Hpimelate, Hsuberate, Hazelate and Hsebacate and UO₂X⋅N₂H₄, where X=malate and oxydiacetate have been prepared and characterized by analytical, spectral (IR and electronic), thermal and X-ray powder diffraction studies. Hydrazine acts as a monodentate ligand in uranyl succinate, glutarate, malate and oxydiacetate hydrazinates and bidentate in uranyl adipate, pimelate, suberate, azelate and sebacate hydrazinate hydrate complexes. The dicarboxylate anions bind the uranium through uni- and bidentate fashion depending upon the coordination polyhedra. All the dicarboxylate hydrazinate complexes in this series decompose to give U₃O₈ as the end product through their respective uranyl dicarboxylate intermediates. Malate and oxydiacetate compounds decompose exothermically in a single step. The coordinated water is confirmed from thermal data. The complexes of succinate to sebacate seem to possess hexagonal bipyramidal geometry around uranium, whereas pentagonal bipyramidal geometry has been proposed for both malate and oxydiacetate complexes. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Synthesis and structure of [UO2(SeO4)(C2H4N4)2] · 0.5H2O

The single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of [UO₂(SeO₄)(C₂H₄N₄)₂] · 0.5H₂O (I) is performed. The crystals are monoclinic: space group C2/c, Z = 8, a = 19.035(2), b = 7.1326(8), c = 21.477(2) Å, β = 109.683(4)°. The main structural units of the crystal are chains of [UO₂(SeO₄)(C₂H₄N₄)₂]. Compound I belongs to the crystal-chemical group AT³M ₂ ¹ (A = UO ₂ ²⁺ , T³ = SeO ₄ ^2? , M¹ is a cyanoguanidine molecule) of the uranyl complexes. The chains are united into three-dimensional framework through hydrogen bonds involving the oxygen atoms of the selenate and uranyl groups, the nitrogen atoms of cyanoguanidine, and the hydrogen atoms of the cyanoguanidine or water molecules.     

Collisional metastability of high rotational states of CN(X2Σ+, = 0)

CN(X²Σ⁺, v′' = 0) high rotational states relax slowly via 300 K collisions with Ar and Kr. Relaxation decreases with increasing rotation, and the partially relaxed distributions are bimodal, with low N′' thermalized (300 K), and N′' = 80 unrelaxed after 1000 collisions. Relaxation by N₂, CO, and Xe is similar to Ar and Kr, but more efficient. He and NO remove many quanta in a single collision.     

Structures and syntheses of framework triuranyl diarsenate hydrates

Two homeotypic hydrated uranyl arsenates, (UO₂)[(UO₂)(AsO₄)]₂(H₂O)₄, UAs4, and (UO₂)[(UO₂)(AsO₄)]₂(H₂O)₅, UAs5 were synthesized by hydrothermal methods. Intensity data were collected at room temperature using MoKα X-radiation and a CCD-based area detector. Their crystal structures were solved by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares techniques on the basis of F² to agreement indices (UAs4, UAs5) wR₂=0.116, 0.060, for all data, and R₁=0.046, 0.033, calculated for 3176, 5306 unique observed reflections (|F_o|>4σ_F) respectively. UAs4 is monoclinic, space group P2₁/c, Z=4, a=11.238(1), b=7.152(1), c=21.941(2)Å, β=104.576(2)°, V=1706.8(1)ų, D_calc=4.51 g/cm³. UAs5 is orthorhombic, space group Pca2₁, Z=4, a=20.133(2), b=11.695(1), c=7.154(1)Å, V=1684.4(1)ų, D_calc=4.65 g/cm³. Both structures contain sheets of arsenate tetrahedra and uranyl pentagonal bipyramids, with composition [(UO₂)(AsO₄)]¹⁻ and the uranophane sheet anion-topology. The sheets are connected by a uranyl pentagonal bipyramid in the interlayer that shares corners with an arsenate tetrahedron on each of two adjacent sheets, resulting in open-frameworks with isolated H₂O groups in the larger cavities of the structures. The uranyl arsenate sheet in UAs4 is relatively planar, and is topologically identical with the uranyl phosphate sheet in (UO₂)[(UO₂)(PO₄)]₂(H₂O)₄. The uranyl arsenate sheet in UAs5 is the same geometrical isomer as in UAs4, but is highly corrugated, exhibiting approximately right angle bends of the sheet after every second uranyl arsenate chain repeat.     

Preparation and Crystal Structure of a New Uranyl Sulfate Templated by a Bis-isothiouronium Cation

Crystals of a new uranyl sulfate (C₂N₄H₈S₂)[UO₂(SO₄)₂] · 0.3H₂O ( 1 ) templated by a relatively rare bis-isothiouronium cation, were formed upon evaporation of aqueous solutions containing uranyl acetate, thiourea, and excess sulfuric acid. The new compound is orthorhombic, P2₁2₁2₁, a = 6.928(2) Å, b = 13.398(3) Å, c = 15.225(3) Å, Z = 2. Its crystal structure is comprised of [UO₂(SO₄)₂] moieties linked by hydrogen bonds formed between the template cations and terminal oxygen atoms of the sulfate tetrahedra. The C₂N₄H₈S₂²⁺ template is most likely formed in situ during a redox reaction between uranyl cation and thiourea in a strongly acidic medium, with UO₂²⁺ partially reduced to U⁴⁺.     

Etude des complexes sulfosalicylate de cuivre(III), nickel(II), cobalt(II) et uranyle(II) a l'aide d'une resine echangeuse de cations: Study of the sulphosalicylate complexes ofcopper(II), nickel(II), cobalt(II) and uranyl(II) by means of cation-exchange resins.

Study of the sulphosalicylate complexes of copper(II), nickel(II), cobalt(II) and uranyl(II) by means of cation-exchange resins.The conditional stability constants of the 1:1 complexes of the sulphosalicylate ions (L^3-) with copper(II), nickel(II), cobalt(II) and uranyl ions have been determined in a sodium perchlorate solution (0.1 M) and at various pH values by a cation-exchange method based on Schubert's procedure. The limits of application of the method are discussed. The variation with pH of the conditional stability constants can be explained by the existence of the complexes: CuH₂L, CuHL, CuL^-; NiH₂L⁺, NiHL, NiL^-; CoHL, CoL^-; UO₂H₂L⁺, UO₂HL, UO₂L^-, UO₂LOH^2-. The stability constants of these complexes are reported. Distribution diagrams of the various complexes of each element with pH and total concentration of sulphosalicylate parameters are given.     

Uranyl complexation by monodentate nitrogen donor ligands. A relativistic density functional study

To examine the interaction of uranyl with nitrogen containing groups of humic substances, the model complexes [UO₂(H₂O)₄L_N]²⁺, L_N = NH₂CH₃, N(CH₃)₃, and NC₅H₅ in aqueous solution were studied computationally with an all‐electron relativistic density functional method. Results are compared with the corresponding penta‐aqua complex of uranyl. Although pyridine coordinates with about the same strength as L = H₂O, methylamine binds ～10 kJ mol^?1 stronger and trimethylamine ～40 kJ mol^?1 weaker than a fifth aqua ligand. Yet, each of these ligands L_N donates about the same amount of charge to uranyl as L = H₂O. U? N bonds are ～10 pm longer than the U? O bonds of the aqua ligands. From the present model results, one does not expect that, when compared with carboxyl groups, monodentate N‐containing functional groups contribute significantly to uranyl complexation by humic substances. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2011     

Uranyl(VI) complexes with a diaminobisphenol from eugenol and N-(2-aminoethyl)morpholine: Syntheses, structures and extraction studies

The syntheses and structural studies of an [O,N,O,N′]-type phenolic ligand [(N’,N’-bis(2-hydroxy-3-methoxy-5-(propen-2-yl)benzyl)-N-(2-aminoethyl)morpholine), (H₂L) and two new uranyl complexes of this ligand are described. The reaction between uranyl nitrate hexahydrate and H₂L in a 1:2 M ratio (M to H₂L) results in a uranyl complex of the formula [UO₂(HL)(NO₃)(H₂O)] (1). In the presence of a base (triethylamine), with the same molar ratio, the uranyl complex [UO₂(HL)₂]·2CH₃CN (2) is formed. The molecular structures H₂L, 1 and 2 were verified by X-ray crystallography. Both uranyl complexes are zwitterions with a neutral net charge. A comprehensive NMR-structural analyses of all compounds were performed in CDCl₃, DMSO-d₆ and pyridine-d₅. Complex 2 dissociates in all the studied NMR-solvents, forming a 1:1 complex and free ligand, but according to the spectra the formed complexes are not alike. The results of the ability of the ligand to extract the uranyl ion from water into dichloromethane are also presented.     

Uranyl aquahydroxylaminate complexes

Uranylaqua complexes with N-methyl-, N-ethyl-, N-isopropyl-, and N,N-dimethylhydroxylamines were studied. The structure of [UO₂{(CH₃)₂NO}₂(H₂O)₂] was determined by X-ray crystallography. The N, N -dimethylhydroxylaminate ion is coordinated to uranyl through the nitrogen and oxygen atoms with the formation of a three-membered chelate ring.     

Neutron diffraction study of UO2SeO4 · 2D2O

A powdered sample of deuterated uranyl selenate dihydrate UO₂SeO₄ · 2D₂O is studied by neutron diffraction. This compound crystallizes in monoclinic space group P2₁/c; a = 6.974(1) Å, b= 8.289(2) Å, c = 11.664(2) Å, β=92.319(6)°, Z = 4, R _f = 3.14, R _I = 5.53, gC² = 2.82. The main structural units of the compound are [UO₂SeO₄(D₂O)₂] chains propagating along [100]. These chains are linked into a framework group (A = UO ₂ ²⁺ , T³ = SeO ₄ ^2? , and M¹ = D₂O) of uranyl complexes. These chains are linked into a framework by a system of hydrogen bonds formed by water hydrogen atoms of one chain and uranyl oxygen atoms of another.     

Solvent extraction of uranyl by N,N,N′,N′-tetraoctylsuccinylamide from nitric acid solution

Synthesis and characterization of N,N,N′,N′-tetraoctylsuccinylamide (TOSA) was carried out and used for extraction of U(VI) from nitric acid solutions. The effect of different factors affecting the extraction distribution ratio (TOSA concentration, concentrations of nitric acid, salting-out agent LiNO₃ concentration, equilibration time, temperature and effect of diluents) have been investigated. The results obtained indicated that TOSA have a great capability to extract uranyl with kerosene-1,3,5-trimethylbenzene than other diluents, it have a high extraction distribution ratios when the concentration of TOSA is lower and not found the third matter. It was found that the main extracted species is UO₂(NO₃)₂·TOSA. The apparent equilibrium constant of extraction determined is (2.32 ± 0.31) L³/mol³ at (298 ± 1) K. The enthalpy of extraction is ?35.20 ± 0.352 kJ/mol.     

Preparation and thermal reactivity of some rare earth and uranyl hydrazinesulfinates and sulfite hydrazinates

Hydrazinesulfinate and sulfite hydrazinate derivatives of rare earth elements of composition Ln(N₂H₃SOO)₃(H₂O) and Ln₂(SO₃)₃(N₂H₄)_x(H₂O)_y, respectively, where Ln=La, Ce, Pr, Nd and Sm, have been prepared and characterized by chemical analysis and infrared spectra. The uranyl complexes of the composition UO₂(N₂H₃SOO)₂, UO₂(N₂H₃SOO)₂(N₂H₄) and UO₂SO₃(N₂H₄)(H₂O) have also been prepared under different reaction conditions and studied by different physicochemical techniques. Thermal properties of all these complexes have been studied by thermogravimetry, and differential scanning calorimetry. The hydrazinesulfinate derivatives of rare earth elements undergo thermal decomposition in multisteps to give the respective metal sulfate as the residue. The other series of complexes, viz., rare earth sulfite hydrazinates gave a mixture of metal sulfate and metal oxide as the end products. However, all the uranyl complexes undergo decomposition in air to give UO₂SO₃ as the final product.