Efficient edge domination in regular graphs

An induced matching of a graph G is a matching having no two edges joined by an edge. An efficient edge dominating set of G is an induced matching M such that every other edge of G is adjacent to some edge in M. We relate maximum induced matchings and efficient edge dominating sets, showing that efficient edge dominating sets are maximum induced matchings, and that maximum induced matchings on regular graphs with efficient edge dominating sets are efficient edge dominating sets. A necessary condition for the existence of efficient edge dominating sets in terms of spectra of graphs is established. We also prove that, for arbitrary fixed p≥3, deciding on the existence of efficient edge dominating sets on p-regular graphs is NP-complete.     

Roman domination in regular graphs

A Roman domination function on a graph G=(V(G),E(G)) is a function f:V(G)→{0,1,2} satisfying the condition that every vertex u for which f(u)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f(v)=2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value f(V(G))=∑_u∈V(G)f(u). The minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on a graph G is called the Roman domination number of G. Cockayne et al. [E. J. Cockayne et al. Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Mathematics 278 (2004) 11-22] showed that γ(G)≤γ_R(G)≤2γ(G) and defined a graph G to be Roman if γ_R(G)=2γ(G). In this article, the authors gave several classes of Roman graphs: P_3k,P_3k+2,C_3k,C_3k+2 for k≥1, K_m,n for min{m,n}≠2, and any graph G with γ(G)=1; In this paper, we research on regular Roman graphs and prove that: (1) the circulant graphs and , n⁄≡1 (mod (2k+1)), (n≠2k) are Roman graphs, (2) the generalized Petersen graphs P(n,2k+1)( (mod 4) and ), P(n,1) (n⁄≡2 (mod 4)), P(n,3) ( (mod 4)) and P(11,3) are Roman graphs, and (3) the Cartesian product graphs are Roman graphs.     

Upper bounds for independent domination in regular graphs

Let G be a regular graph of order n and degree δ. The independent domination numberi(G) is defined to be the minimum cardinality among all maximal independent sets of vertices of G. We establish upper bounds, as functions of n and δ, for the sum and product of the independent domination numbers of a regular graph and its complement.     

A note on Roman domination in graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a simple graph. A subset S⊆V is a dominating set of G, if for any vertex u∈V-S, there exists a vertex v∈S such that uv∈E. The domination number of G, γ(G), equals the minimum cardinality of a dominating set. A Roman dominating function on graph G=(V,E) is a function f:V→{0,1,2} satisfying the condition that every vertex v for which f(v)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex u for which f(u)=2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value f(V)=∑_v∈Vf(v). The Roman domination number of a graph G, denoted by γ_R(G), equals the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on G. In this paper, for any integer k(2?k?γ(G)), we give a characterization of graphs for which γ_R(G)=γ(G)+k, which settles an open problem in [E.J. Cockayne, P.M. Dreyer Jr, S.M. Hedetniemi et al. On Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 278 (2004) 11-22].     

Bounds on the connected domination number of a graph

A subset S$S$ of vertices in a graph G=(V,E)$G=(V,E)$ is a connected dominating set of G$G$ if every vertex of V?S$V?S$ is adjacent to a vertex in S$S$ and the subgraph induced by S$S$ is connected. The minimum cardinality of a connected dominating set of G$G$ is the connected domination number _γc(G)${\gamma }_c\left(G\right)$. The girth g(G)$g\left(G\right)$ is the length of a shortest cycle in G$G$. We show that if G$G$ is a connected graph that contains at least one cycle, then _γc(G)≥g(G)−2${\gamma }_c\left(G\right)\ge g\left(G\right)-2$, and we characterize the graphs obtaining equality in this bound. We also establish various upper bounds on the connected domination number of a graph, as well as Nordhaus–Gaddum type results.     

A note on the domination dot-critical graphs

A graph G is dot-critical if contracting any edge decreases the domination number. Nader Jafari Rad (2009) [3] posed the problem: Is it true that a connected k-dot-critical graph G with G^′=0? is 2-connected? In this note, we give a family of 1-connected 2k-dot-critical graph with G^′=0? and show that this problem has a negative answer.     

Unique response Roman domination in graphs

A function f:V(G)→{0,1,2} is a Roman dominating function if every vertex u for which f(u)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f(v)=2. A function f:V(G)→{0,1,2} with the ordered partition (V₀,V₁,V₂) of V(G), where V_i={v∈V(G)∣f(v)=i} for i=0,1,2, is a unique response Roman function if x∈V₀ implies |N(x)∩V₂|≤1 and x∈V₁∪V₂ implies that |N(x)∩V₂|=0. A function f:V(G)→{0,1,2} is a unique response Roman dominating function if it is a unique response Roman function and a Roman dominating function. The unique response Roman domination number of G, denoted by u_R(G), is the minimum weight of a unique response Roman dominating function. In this paper we study the unique response Roman domination number of graphs and present bounds for this parameter.     

Connected k-dominating graphs

For a graph $G=(V,E)$, the $k$-dominating graph $D_k\left(G\right)$ of $G$ has vertices corresponding to the dominating sets of $G$ having cardinality at most $k$, where two vertices of $D_k\left(G\right)$ are adjacent if and only if the dominating set corresponding to one of the vertices can be obtained from the dominating set corresponding to the second vertex by the addition or deletion of a single vertex. We denote the domination and upper domination numbers of $G$ by $\gamma \left(G\right)$ and $\Gamma \left(G\right)$, respectively, and the smallest integer $\epsilon$ for which $D_k\left(G\right)$ is connected for all $k\ge \epsilon$ by $d_0\left(G\right)$. It is known that $\Gamma \left(G\right)+1\le d_0\left(G\right)\le \left|V\right|$, but constructing a graph $G$ such that $d_0\left(G\right)>\Gamma \left(G\right)+1$ appears to be difficult.We present two related constructions. The first construction shows that for each integer $k\ge 3$ and each integer $r$ such that $1\le r\le k?1$, there exists a graph $G_{k,r}$ such that $\Gamma \left(G_{k,r}\right)=k$, $\gamma \left(G_{k,r}\right)=r+1$ and $d_0\left(G_{k,r}\right)=k+r=\Gamma \left(G\right)+\gamma \left(G\right)?1$. The second construction shows that for each integer $k\ge 3$ and each integer $r$ such that $1\le r\le k?1$, there exists a graph $Q_{k,r}$ such that $\Gamma \left(Q_{k,r}\right)=k$, $\gamma \left(Q_{k,r}\right)=r$ and $d_0\left(Q_{k,r}\right)=k+r=\Gamma \left(G\right)+\gamma \left(G\right)$.     

On global domination critical graphs

A dominating set of a graph G=(V,E) is a subset S⊆V such that every vertex not in S is adjacent to at least one vertex of S. The domination number of G is the cardinality of a smallest dominating set. The global domination number, γ_g(G), is the cardinality of a smallest set S that is simultaneously a dominating set of both G and its complement . Graphs for which γ_g(G−e)>γ_g(G) for all edges e∈E are characterized, as are graphs for which γ_g(G−e)<γ_g(G) for all edges e∈E whenever is disconnected. Progress is reported in the latter case when is connected.     

Weighted domination in triangle-free graphs

A weighted graph (G,w) is a graph G together with a positive weight-function on its vertex set w : V(G)→R^>0. The weighted domination number γ_w(G) of (G,w) is the minimum weight w(D)=∑_vDw(v) of a set DV(G) such that every vertex xV(D)−D has a neighbor in D. If ∑_vV(G)w(v)=|V(G)|, then we speak of a normed weighted graph. Recently, we proved that

for normed weighted bipartite graphs (G,w) of order n such that neither G nor the complement has isolated vertices. In this paper we will extend these Nordhaus–Gaddum-type results to triangle-free graphs.     

A note on the independent domination number in graphs

We obtain an upper bound for the independent domination number of a graph in terms of the domination number and maximum degree.     

Liar’s domination in graphs

Assume that each vertex of a graph G is the possible location for an “intruder” such as a thief, or a saboteur, a fire in a facility or some possible processor fault in a computer network. A device at a vertex v is assumed to be able to detect the intruder at any vertex in its closed neighborhood N[v]and to identify at which vertex inN[v] the intruder is located. One must then have a dominating set S⊆V(G), a set with ∪_v∈SN[v]=V(G), to be able to identify any intruder’s location. If any one device can fail to detect the intruder, then one needs a double-dominating set. This paper considers liar’s dominating sets, sets that can identify an intruder’s location even when any one device in the neighborhood of the intruder vertex can lie, that is, any one device in the neighborhood of the intruder vertex can misidentify any vertex in its closed neighborhood as the intruder location. Liar’s dominating sets lie between double dominating sets and triple dominating sets because every triple dominating set is a liar’s dominating set, and every liar’s dominating set must double dominate.     

Nordhaus-Gaddum results for restrained domination and total restrained domination in graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A set S⊆V is a total restrained dominating set if every vertex is adjacent to a vertex in S and every vertex of V-S is adjacent to a vertex in V-S. A set S⊆V is a restrained dominating set if every vertex in V-S is adjacent to a vertex in S and to a vertex in V-S. The total restrained domination number of G (restrained domination number of G, respectively), denoted by γ_tr(G) (γ_r(G), respectively), is the smallest cardinality of a total restrained dominating set (restrained dominating set, respectively) of G. We bound the sum of the total restrained domination numbers of a graph and its complement, and provide characterizations of the extremal graphs achieving these bounds. It is known (see [G.S. Domke, J.H. Hattingh, S.T. Hedetniemi, R.C. Laskar, L.R. Markus, Restrained domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 203 (1999) 61-69.]) that if G is a graph of order n?2 such that both G and are not isomorphic to P₃, then . We also provide characterizations of the extremal graphs G of order n achieving these bounds.     

Total domination dot-stable graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. Two vertices of G are said to be dotted (identified) if they are combined to form one vertex whose open neighborhood is the union of their neighborhoods minus themselves. We note that dotting any pair of vertices cannot increase the total domination number. Further we show it can decrease the total domination number by at most 2. A graph is total domination dot-stable if dotting any pair of adjacent vertices leaves the total domination number unchanged. We characterize the total domination dot-stable graphs and give a sharp upper bound on their total domination number. We also characterize the graphs attaining this bound.     

The exact domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A subset S⊆V is a dominating set of G, if every vertex u∈V−S is dominated by some vertex v∈S. The domination number, denoted by γ(G), is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set. For the generalized Petersen graph G(n), Behzad et al. [A. Behzad, M. Behzad, C.E. Praeger, On the domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs, Discrete Mathematics 308 (2008) 603-610] proved that and conjectured that the upper bound is the exact domination number. In this paper we prove this conjecture.     

On the domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs

Graph domination numbers and algorithms for finding them have been investigated for numerous classes of graphs, usually for graphs that have some kind of tree-like structure. By contrast, we study an infinite family of regular graphs, the generalized Petersen graphs G(n). We give two procedures that between them produce both upper and lower bounds for the (ordinary) domination number of G(n), and we conjecture that our upper bound ⌈3n/5⌉ is the exact domination number. To our knowledge this is one of the first classes of regular graphs for which such a procedure has been used to estimate the domination number.     

四正则图的分离问题是NP-完备的

本 文证明了 四正则图 的最小平 分问题是 Ｎ Ｐ完备的 ,因而可得 到四正 则图的最 小 α分离问 题也是 Ｎ Ｐ完备 的