Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and time delay between on-frequency and flanking-band maskers

The threshold for a signal masked by a narrow band of noise centered at the signal frequency (the on-frequency band) may be reduced by adding to the masker a second band of noise (the flanking band) whose envelope is correlated with that of the first band, an effect called comodulation masking release (CMR). This paper examines CMR as a function of masker bandwidth and time delay between the envelopes of the on-frequency and flanking bands. The 1.0-kHz sinusoidal signal had a duration of 400 ms. The on-frequency band was presented alone (reference condition) or with the flanking band. The flanking-band envelope was either correlated or uncorrelated with that of the on-frequency band. Flanking-band center frequencies ranged from 0.25-2.0 kHz. The flanking band was presented either in the same ear as the on-frequency band (monaural condition) or in the opposite ear (dichotic condition). The noise bands had bandwidths of 6.25, 25, or 100 Hz. In the correlated conditions, the flanking-band envelope was delayed with respect to that of the on-frequency band by 0, 5, 10, or 20 ms. For the 100-Hz bandwidth, CMRs were small (typically less than 1 dB) in both monaural and dichotic conditions at all delay times. For the 25-Hz bandwidth, CMRs were about 3.5 dB for the 0-ms delay, and decreased to about 1.5 dB for the 20-ms delay. For the 6.25-Hz bandwidth, CMRs averaged about 5 dB and were almost independent of delay time. The results suggest that the absolute delay time is not the critical variable determining CMR. The magnitude of CMR appears to depend on the correlation between the envelopes of the on-frequency and flanking bands. However, the results do not support a model of CMR that assumes that signal threshold corresponds to a constant change in across-band envelope correlation when the correlation is transformed to Fisher's z.     

Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration

These experiments examine how comodulation masking release (CMR) varies with masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration. In experiment 1, thresholds were measured for a 400-ms, 2000-Hz signal masked by continuous noise varying in bandwidth from 50-3200 Hz in 1-oct steps. In one condition, using random noise maskers, thresholds increased with increasing bandwidth up to 400 Hz and then remained approximately constant. In another set of conditions, the masker was multiplied (amplitude modulated) by a low-pass noise (bandwidth varied from 12.5-400 Hz in 1-oct steps). This produced correlated envelope fluctuations across frequency. Thresholds were generally lower than for random noise maskers with the same bandwidth. For maskers less than one critical band wide, the release from masking was largest (about 5 dB) for maskers with low rates of modulation (12.5-Hz-wide low-pass modulator). It is argued that this release from masking is not a "true" CMR but results from a within-channel cue. For broadband maskers (greater than 400 Hz), the release from masking increased with increasing masker bandwidth and decreasing modulator bandwidth, reaching an asymptote of 12 dB for a masker bandwidth of 800 Hz and a modulator bandwidth of 50 Hz. Most of this release from masking can be attributed to a CMR. In experiment 2, the modulator bandwidth was fixed at 12.5 Hz and the signal duration was varied. For masker bandwidths greater than 400 Hz, the CMR decreased from 12 to 5 dB as the signal duration was decreased from 400 to 25 ms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comodulation masking release in a forward-masking paradigm

Waveforms that yield comodulation masking release (CMR) when they are presented simultaneously with a signal were used in a standard forward-masking procedure. The signal was a 25-ms sample of a 2500-Hz tone. The masker was a band of noise centered at 2500 Hz, 100 Hz in width, and 200 ms in duration. Presented with the masker were two or four cue bands, each 100 Hz wide and centered at various distances from the masker band. These cue bands either all had the same temporal envelope as the masker band (correlated condition) or their common envelope was different from that of the masker band (uncorrelated condition). In the initial experiments, (1) detectability of the tonal signal was 7-18 dB better when the masker band was accompanied by cue bands than when it was not--an effect that would be expected from past research on lateral suppression--but further, (2) the signal was about 3 dB more detectable in the correlated conditions than in the uncorrelated conditions. In follow-up experiments, these CMR-like differences between the correlated and uncorrelated conditions were substantially reduced (although not eliminated) by presenting a contralateral, wideband noise that was gated synchronously with the masker and/or cue bands. The implications are that the initial results were attributable in part to the "confusion effects" known to exist in certain temporal-masking situations, and that listeners are able to obtain greater information about the temporal extent of a masker band from correlated cue bands than from uncorrelated bands.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comodulation masking release and auditory grouping

The detectability of a pure-tone signal masked by a band of noise centered on the signal can be improved by the addition of flanking noise bands, provided that the temporal envelopes of the flanking bands are correlated with that of the on-signal band. This phenomenon is referred to as comodulation masking release (CMR). The present study examined CMR in conditions in which some flanking noise bands were comodulated with the on-signal band, but other flanking bands (termed "deviant" bands) were not. Past research has indicated that CMR is often substantially reduced when deviant bands are present at spectral locations close to the signal frequency. An investigation was undertaken to determine whether the disruptive effects of such bands could be reduced by factors related to auditory grouping. The signal frequency was 100 Hz. In one condition, only 20-Hz-wide comodulated bands, centered on 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, and 1600 Hz, were present. The CMR for this condition, referenced to threshold for the on-signal band only, was approximately 15 dB. In a second condition, two deviant bands were added at 900 and 1100 Hz; their presence reduced the CMR to only 3-4 dB. The number of deviant bands was then increased progressively, from two to eight bands. Deviant bands either shared a common envelope (codeviant), or had unique envelopes (multideviant). The number of bands that were comodulated with the on-signal band was held constant at six.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comodulation masking release in consonant recognition

Comodulation masking release (CMR) refers to an improvement in the detection threshold of a signal masked by noise with coherent amplitude fluctuation across frequency, as compared to noise without the envelope coherence. The present study tested whether such an advantage for signal detection would facilitate the identification of speech phonemes. Consonant identification of bandpass speech was measured under the following three masker conditions: (1) a single band of noise in the speech band ("on-frequency" masker); (2) two bands of noise, one in the on-frequency band and the other in the "flanking band," with coherence of temporal envelope fluctuation between the two bands (comodulation); and (3) two bands of noise (on-frequency band and flanking band), without the coherence of the envelopes (noncomodulation). A pilot experiment with a small number of consonant tokens was followed by the main experiment with 12 consonants and the following masking conditions: three frequency locations of the flanking band and two masker levels. Results showed that in all conditions, the comodulation condition provided higher identification scores than the noncomodulation condition, and the difference in score was 3.5% on average. No significant difference was observed between the on-frequency only condition and the comodulation condition, i.e., an "unmasking" effect by the addition of a comodulated flaking band was not observed. The positive effect of CMR on consonant recognition found in the present study endorses a "cued-listening" theory, rather than an envelope correlation theory, as a basis of CMR in a suprathreshold task.     

Comodulation masking release and the masking-level difference

An experiment was performed to determine if the mechanism that mediates comodulation masking release (CMR) is associated with that used to improve detection by the masking-level difference (MLD). The experiment consisted of first improving detectability of a masked diotic tone burst by adding a synchronous noise band at another frequency region (CMR), and then measuring an MLD in the usual manner, by inverting the tone-burst signal to one ear. Results indicate that a substantial MLD can be measured for a signal whose detectability has already been improved by CMR. However, that MLD (9 dB) is smaller than that measured in random noise (14 dB). Put another way, a small CMR (4 dB) can be produced even when the detectability of a stimulus has already been improved due to the MLD. These data are in general agreement with those of Hall et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 1839-1845 (1988)] and Schooneveldt and Moore [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 262-272 (1989)].     

Comodulation masking release for speech stimuli.

This study sought to determine whether speech recognition in a modulating noise background can be facilitated by a process attributable to comodulation masking release (CMR). Experiment 1 examined the masked identification of six filtered vowels as a function of the number of comodulated noisebands present. A benefit of increased number was observed, consistent with an interpretation in terms of CMR, although it could not be certain that the basis of the discrimination was word recognition in the semantic sense. Experiment 2 made use of a forced-choice rhyming test in which the response foils differed only in a single filtered consonant; again, the measure of interest was performance as a function of the number of comodulated noisebands present. No evidence for a suprathreshold CMR was observed. Experiment 3 made use of open-set sentence material and employed a different paradigm, which allowed a measure of CMR in terms of the difference between thresholds in correlated and uncorrelated noise to be determined. While a CMR for speech detection was observed, no CMR for speech recognition was found. It was concluded that CMR is most evident in masked detection tasks and that diminishing returns are encountered as the signal-to-masker ratio is raised.     

Comodulation masking release: evidence for multiple cues

Signal detection was determined in conditions where the masker was a 10-Hz-wide noise band centered on the signal, and in conditions where either a comodulated or noncomodulated noise band (centered at 0.8 times the signal frequency) was also present. Signal frequencies of 500 or 2000 Hz were investigated. In one condition of the first experiment, the signal was exactly the same 10-Hz-wide noise band as the masker, added to the masker in phase. This condition was designed to limit the availability of cues based upon dip listening, suppression, beating, or across-frequency differences in noise envelope correlation, but to afford a cue based upon across-frequency envelope amplitude difference. The narrow-band noise signal resulted in approximately the same magnitude of comodulated masking release (CMR) as was found for a pure-tone signal. This result suggested that one important cue for CMR is an across-frequency difference in envelope amplitude. Stimulus conditions in the second experiment were intended to disrupt cues of across-frequency envelope amplitude difference, but to afford cues based upon across-frequency differences in noise envelope correlation. In this experiment, cues based upon envelope amplitude were impoverished by randomly varying the level of the flanking band from interval to interval, and by adjusting the level in the on-signal band to be the same in the nonsignal intervals as the level of noise plus signal in the signal interval. Again, substantial CMRs occurred, suggesting that another cue for CMR may be envelope pattern or correlation. The results of these experiments indicated that CMR is probably based upon more than one stimulus variable.     

Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band

In experiment I, thresholds for 400-ms sinusoidal signals were measured in the presence of a continuous 25-Hz-wide noise centered at signal frequencies (fs) ranging from 250 to 8000 Hz in 1-oct steps. The masker was presented either alone or together with a second continuous 25-Hz-wide band of noise (the flanking band) whose envelope was either correlated with that of the on-frequency band or was uncorrelated; its center frequency ranged from 0.5 fs to 1.5 fs. The flanking band was presented either in the same ear (monotic condition) as the signal plus masker or in the opposite ear (dichotic condition). The on-frequency band and the flanking band each had an overall level of 67 dB SPL. The comodulation masking release, CMR (U-C), is defined as the difference between the thresholds for the uncorrelated and correlated conditions. The CMR (U-C) showed two components: a broadly tuned component, occurring at all signal frequencies and all flanking-band frequencies, and occurring for both monotic and dichotic conditions; and a component restricted to the monotic condition and to flanking-band frequencies close to fs. This sharply tuned component was small for low signal frequencies, increased markedly at 2000 and 4000 Hz, and decreased at 8000 Hz. Experiment II showed that the sharply tuned component of the CMR (U-C) was slightly reduced in magnitude when the level of the flanking band was 10 dB above that of the on-frequency band and was markedly reduced when the level was 10 dB below, whereas the broadly tuned component and the dichotic CMR (U-C) were only slightly affected. Experiment III showed that the sharply tuned component of the CMR (U-C) was markedly reduced when the bandwidths of the on-frequency and flanking bands were increased to 100 Hz, while the broadly tuned component and the dichotic CMR (U-C) decreased only slightly. The argument here is that the sharply tuned component of the monotic CMR (U-C) results from beating between the "carrier" frequencies of the two masker bands. This introduces periodic zeros in the masker envelope, which facilitate signal detection. The broadly tuned component, which is probably a "true" CMR, was only about 3 dB.     

Comodulation masking release in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)

The acoustic environment of the bottlenose dolphin often consists of noise where energy across frequency regions is coherently modulated in time (e.g., ambient noise from snapping shrimp). However, most masking studies with dolphins have employed random Gaussian noise for estimating patterns of masked thresholds. The current study demonstrates a pattern of masking where temporally fluctuating comodulated noise produces lower masked thresholds (up to a 17 dB difference) compared to Gaussian noise of the same spectral density level. Noise possessing wide bandwidths, low temporal modulation rates, and across-frequency temporal envelope coherency resulted in lower masked thresholds, a phenomenon known as comodulation masking release. The results are consistent with a model where dolphins compare temporal envelope information across auditory filters to aid in signal detection. Furthermore, results suggest conventional models of masking derived from experiments using random Gaussian noise may not generalize well to environmental noise that dolphins actually encounter.     

Comodulation masking release in speech identification with real and simulated cochlear-implant hearing

For normal-hearing (NH) listeners, masker energy outside the spectral region of a target signal can improve target detection and identification, a phenomenon referred to as comodulation masking release (CMR). This study examined whether, for cochlear implant (CI) listeners and for NH listeners presented with a "noise vocoded" CI simulation, speech identification in modulated noise is improved by a co-modulated flanking band. In Experiment 1, NH listeners identified noise-vocoded speech in a background of on-target noise with or without a flanking narrow band of noise outside the spectral region of the target. The on-target noise and flanker were either 16-Hz square-wave modulated with the same phase or were unmodulated; the speech was taken from a closed-set corpus. Performance was better in modulated than in unmodulated noise, and this difference was slightly greater when the comodulated flanker was present, consistent with a small CMR of about 1.7 dB for noise-vocoded speech. Experiment 2, which tested CI listeners using the same speech materials, found no advantage for modulated versus unmodulated maskers and no CMR. Thus although NH listeners can benefit from CMR even for speech signals with reduced spectro-temporal detail, no CMR was observed for CI users.     

Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency

Auditory filter bandwidths were measured using nonsimultaneous masking, as a function of signal level between 10 and 35 dB SL for signal frequencies of 1, 2, 4, and 6 kHz. The brief sinusoidal signal was presented in a temporal gap within a spectrally notched noise. Two groups of normal-hearing subjects were tested, one using a fixed masker level and adaptively varying signal level, the other using a fixed signal level and adaptively varying masker level. In both cases, auditory filters were derived by assuming a constant filter shape for a given signal level. The filter parameters derived from the two paradigms were not significantly different. At 1 kHz, the equivalent rectangular bandwidth (ERB) decreased as the signal level increased from 10 to 20 dB SL, after which it remained roughly constant. In contrast, at 6 kHz, the ERB increased consistently with signal levels from 10 to 35 dB SL. The results at 2 and 4 kHz were intermediate, showing no consistent change in ERB with signal level. Overall, the results suggest changes in the level dependence of the auditory filters at frequencies above 1 kHz that are not currently incorporated in models of human auditory filter tuning.     

Comodulation masking release using SAM tonal complex maskers: effects of modulation depth and signal position

The purpose of this investigation was to examine two stimulus parameters that were reasoned to be of importance to comodulation masking release (CMR). The first was the degree of fluctuation, or depth of modulation, in the masker bands, and the second was the temporal position of the signal with respect to the modulations of the masker. The investigation began by demonstrating the efficacy of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tonal complex maskers in eliciting CMR. "Nine-band" maskers, 650 ms in duration, were constructed by adding together nine SAM tones spaced at 100-Hz intervals from 300 to 1100 Hz. The rate of modulation for each SAM tone was 10 Hz, and the depth of modulation was 100%. Using such maskers, it was shown that when the on-frequency SAM tone had a modulation depth of 100%, the threshold for a 250-ms, 700-Hz tone improved monotonically as the modulation depths of the flanking SAM tones increased from 0% to 100%. When the on-frequency SAM tone had a modulation depth of 63%, some listeners performed optimally when the flanking SAM tones also exhibited a modulation depth of 63%, whereas others performed best when the flankers had modulation depths of 100%. With regard to signal position, a typical CMR effect was observed when the signal, consisting of a train of three 50-ms, 700-Hz tone bursts, was placed in the dips of the on-frequency masker. However, when the signal was placed at the peaks of the envelope, an increase in masking was observed for a comodulated masker.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Spectral modulation detection as a function of modulation frequency, carrier bandwidth, and carrier frequency region

The present study investigates the nature of spectral envelope perception using a spectral modulation detection task in which sinusoidal spectral modulation is superimposed upon a noise carrier. The principal goal of this study is to characterize spectral envelope perception in terms of the influence of modulation frequency (cycles/octave), carrier bandwidth (octaves), and carrier frequency region (defined by lower and upper cutoff frequencies in Hz). Spectral modulation detection thresholds measured as a function of spectral modulation frequency result in a spectral modulation transfer function (SMTF). The general form of the SMTF is bandpass in nature, with a minimum modulation detection threshold in the region between 2 to 4 cycles/octave. SMTFs are not strongly dependent on carrier bandwidth (ranging from 1 to 6 octaves) or carrier frequency region (ranging from 200 to 12 800 Hz), with the exception of carrier bands restricted to very low audio frequencies (e.g., 200-400 Hz). Spectral modulation detection thresholds do not depend on the presence of random level variations or random modulation phase across intervals. The SMTFs reported here and associated excitation pattern computations are considered in terms of a linear systems approach to spectral envelope perception and potential underlying mechanisms for the perception of spectral features.     

Comodulation masking release: effects of training and experimental design on use of within- and across-channel cues

The effects of training and experimental design on comodulation masking release (CMR) were assessed. The study of Dau et al. [(2009), J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 2182-2188], which used auditory-grouping manipulations to distinguish the use of within- and across-channel cues to CMR, was replicated in Experiment One but using naive subjects and an experimental design that minimized familiarization with the cues. Subjects made effective use of within- but not across-channel cues. Experiment Two examined training effects over more testing sessions, across four experimental designs (to minimize or maximize repeated exposure to the cues) and using an auditory grouping manipulation ("postcursors") to distinguish the use of within- and across-channel cues. Naive subjects were tested with either two or four flanking bands (FBs), to determine if training effects varied with the amount of FB information. Within-channel cues could be used from the outset, but effective use of across-channel cues required training when they were less salient. Increased repeated exposure enhanced the effects of training. Experiment Three tested naive subjects using two FBs, but with noise presented continuously and a different auditory grouping manipulation, after Grose et al. [(2009), J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 282-293]. CMR was large from the outset.     

Comodulation masking release for various monaural and binaural combinations of the signal, on-frequency, and flanking bands

The threshold for a signal masked by a narrow band of noise centered at the signal frequency (the on-frequency band) may be reduced by adding to the masker a second band of noise (the flanking band) whose envelope is correlated with that of the first band. This effect is called comodulation masking release (CMR). These experiments examine two questions. (1) How does the CMR vary with the number and ear of presentation of the flanking band(s)? (2) Is it possible to obtain a CMR when a binaural masking level difference (BMLD) is already present, and vice versa? Thresholds were measured for a 400-ms signal in a continuous 25-Hz-wide noise centered at signal frequencies (fs) of 250, 1000, and 4000 Hz. This masker was presented either alone or with one or more continuous flanking bands whose envelopes were either correlated or uncorrelated with that of the on-frequency band; their frequencies ranged from 0.5fs to 1.5fs. CMRs were measured for six conditions in which the signal, the on-frequency band, and the flanking band(s) were presented in various monaural and binaural combinations. When a single flanking band was used, the CMR was typically around 2-3 dB. The CMR increased to 5-6 dB if an additional flanking band was added. The effect of the additional band was similar whether it was in the same ear as the original band or in the opposite ear. At the lowest signal frequency, a large CMR was observed in addition to a BMLD and vice versa. At the highest signal frequency, the extra release from masking was small. The results are interpreted in terms of the cues producing the CMR and the BMLD.     

The detection of temporal gaps as a function of frequency region and absolute noise bandwidth.

Temporal gap detection was measured as a function of absolute signal bandwidth at a low-, a mid-, and a high-frequency region in six listeners with normal hearing sensitivity. Gap detection threshold decreased monotonically with increasing stimulus bandwidth at each of the three frequency regions. Given conditions of equivalent absolute bandwidth, gap detection thresholds were not significantly different for upper cutoff frequencies ranging from 600 to 4400 Hz. A second experiment investigated gap detection thresholds at two pressure-spectrum levels, conditions typically resulting in substantially different estimates of frequency selectivity. Estimates of frequency selectivity were collected at the two levels using a notched-noise masker technique. The gap threshold-signal bandwidth functions were almost identical at pressure-spectrum levels of 70 dB and 40 dB for the two subjects in experiment II, while estimates of frequency selectivity showed poorer frequency selectivity at the 70-dB level than at 40 dB. Data from both experiments indicated that gap detection in bandlimited noise was inversely related to signal bandwidth and that gap detection did not vary significantly with changes in signal frequency over the range of 600 to 4400 Hz. Over the range of frequencies investigated, the results indicated no clear relation between gap detection for noise stimuli and peripheral auditory filtering.     

Comodulation masking release: effects of varying the level, duration, and time delay of the cue band

The phenomenon of comodulation masking release (CMR) was studied in a series of experiments. When the relative level of the correlated cue band was more than about 10 dB less than that of the masker band, the CMR was abolished. When the duration of the tonal signal was varied with continuous maskers and cues, the course of the standard temporal-integration function (about -10 dB/decade) was followed by both the correlated-cue and the uncorrelated-cue conditions. In a burst masker paradigm employing several burst durations, the data for the correlated-cue condition closely followed the previously determined temporal-integration function. Finally, when the cue band was time delayed more than about 1.6 ms, the CMR began to decline, and it was abolished somewhere between 3 and 15 ms of delay, depending upon the subject. This latter outcome was essentially the same for masker and cue bands of both 75 and 100 Hz in width; in neither instance was there evidence of a cyclic, autocorrelation-like pattern following the period of the envelope. Supplementary experiments revealed two facts: The detectability of a masked narrow-band signal is not improved by the simultaneous presence of a correlated (or uncorrelated) noise band, and a small CMR can be obtained under conditions of forward masking.     

Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release

These experiments on across-channel masking (ACM) and comodulation masking release (CMR) were designed to extend the work of Grose and Hall [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 1276-1284 (1989)] on CMR. They investigated the effect of the temporal position of a brief 700-Hz signal relative to the modulation cycle of a 700-Hz masker 100% sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) at a 10-Hz rate, which was either presented alone (reference masker) or formed part of a masker consisting of the 3rd to 11th harmonics of a 100-Hz fundamental. In the harmonic maskers, each harmonic was either SAM with the same 10-Hz modulator phase (comodulated masker) or with a shift in modulator phase of 90 degrees for each successive harmonic (phase-incoherent masker). When the signal was presented at the dips of the envelope of the 700-Hz component, the comodulated masker gave lower thresholds than the reference masker, while the phase-incoherent masker gave higher thresholds, i.e., a CMR was observed. No CMR was found when the signal was presented at the peaks of the envelope. In experiment 1, we replicated the experiment of Grose and Hall, but with an additional condition in which the 600- and 800-Hz components were removed from the masker, in order to investigate the role of within-channel masking effects. The results were similar to those of Grose and Hall. In experiment 2, the signal was added at the peaks of the envelope of the 700-Hz component, but in antiphase to the carrier of that component and at a level chosen to transform the peaks into dips. No CMR was found. Rather, performance was worse for both the comodulated and phase-incoherent maskers than for the reference masker. This was true even when the flanking components in the maskers were all remote in frequency from 700 Hz. In experiment 3, the masker components were all 50% SAM and the signal was added in antiphase at a dip of the envelope of the 700-Hz component, thus making the dip deeper. Performance was worse for the phase-incoherent than for the reference masker and was worse still for the comodulated masker. The results of all three experiments indicate strong ACM effects. CMR was found only when the signal was placed in the dips of the masker envelope and when it produced an increase in level relative to that in adjacent bands.