An efficient Differential Evolution based algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems

In the present study, a modified variant of Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems is presented. The proposed algorithm, named Multi-Objective Differential Evolution Algorithm (MODEA) utilizes the advantages of Opposition-Based Learning for generating an initial population of potential candidates and the concept of random localization in mutation step. Finally, it introduces a new selection mechanism for generating a well distributed Pareto optimal front. The performance of proposed algorithm is investigated on a set of nine bi-objective and five tri-objective benchmark test functions and the results are compared with some recently modified versions of DE for MOPs and some other Multi Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs). The empirical analysis of the numerical results shows the efficiency of the proposed algorithm.     

On branching heuristics for the bi-objective 0/1 unidimensional knapsack problem

This paper focuses on branching strategies that are involved in branch and bound algorithms when solving multi-objective optimization problems. The choice of the branching variable at each node of the search tree constitutes indeed an important component of these algorithms. In this work we focus on multi-objective knapsack problems. In the literature, branching heuristics used for these problems are static, i.e., the order on the variables is determined prior to the execution. This study investigates the benefit of defining more sophisticated branching strategies. We first analyze and compare a representative set of classic branching heuristics and conclude that none can be identified as the best overall heuristic. Using an oracle, we highlight that combining branching heuristics within the same branch and bound algorithm leads to considerably reduced search trees but induces high computational costs. Based on learning adaptive techniques, we propose then dynamic adaptive branching strategies that are able to select the suitable heuristic to apply at each node of the search tree. Experiments are conducted on the bi-objective 0/1 unidimensional knapsack problem.     

Evaluating selection methods on hyper-heuristic multi-objective particle swarm optimization

Multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) is a promising meta-heuristic to solve multi-objective problems (MOPs). Previous works have shown that selecting a proper combination of leader and archiving methods, which is a challenging task, improves the search ability of the algorithm. A previous study has employed a simple hyper-heuristic to select these components, obtaining good results. In this research, an analysis is made to verify if using more advanced heuristic selection methods improves the search ability of the algorithm. Empirical studies are conducted to investigate this hypothesis. In these studies, first, four heuristic selection methods are compared: a choice function, a multi-armed bandit, a random one, and the previously proposed roulette wheel. A second study is made to identify if it is best to adapt only the leader method, the archiving method, or both simultaneously. Moreover, the influence of the interval used to replace the low-level heuristic is analyzed. At last, a final study compares the best variant to a hyper-heuristic framework that combines a Multi-Armed Bandit algorithm into the multi-objective optimization based on decomposition with dynamical resource allocation (MOEA/D-DRA) and a state-of-the-art MOPSO. Our results indicate that the resulting algorithm outperforms the hyper-heuristic framework in most of the problems investigated. Moreover, it achieves competitive results compared to a state-of-the-art MOPSO.     

Differential evolution framework for big data optimization

During the last two decades, dealing with big data problems has become a major issue for many industries. Although, in recent years, differential evolution has been successful in solving many complex optimization problems, there has been research gaps on using it to solve big data problems. As a real-time big data problem may not be known in advance, determining the appropriate differential evolution operators and parameters to use is a combinatorial optimization problem. Therefore, in this paper, a general differential evolution framework is proposed, in which the most suitable differential evolution algorithm for a problem on hand is adaptively configured. A local search is also employed to increase the exploitation capability of the proposed algorithm. The algorithm is tested on the 2015 big data optimization competition problems (six single objective problems and six multi-objective problems). The results show the superiority of the proposed algorithm to several state-of-the-art algorithms.     

A particle swarm optimization-based hybrid algorithm for minimum concave cost network flow problems

Traditionally, minimum cost transshipment problems have been simplified as linear cost problems, which are not practical in real applications. Some advanced local search algorithms have been developed to solve concave cost bipartite network problems. These have been found to be more effective than the traditional linear approximation methods and local search methods. Recently, a genetic algorithm and an ant colony system algorithm were employed to develop two global search algorithms for solving concave cost transshipment problems. These two global search algorithms were found to be more effective than the advanced local search algorithms for solving concave cost transshipment problems. Although the particle swarm optimization algorithm has been used to obtain good results in many applications, to the best of our knowledge, it has not yet been applied in minimum concave cost network flow problems. Thus, in this study, we employ an arc-based particle swarm optimization algorithm, coupled with some genetic algorithm and threshold accepting method techniques, as well as concave cost network heuristics, to develop a hybrid global search algorithm for efficiently solving minimum cost network flow problems with concave arc costs. The proposed algorithm is evaluated by solving several randomly generated network flow problems. The results indicate that the proposed algorithm is more effective than several other recently designed methods, such as local search algorithms, genetic algorithms and ant colony system algorithms, for solving minimum cost network flow problems with concave arc costs.     

Heuristic approaches to determine base-stock levels in a serial supply chain with a single objective and with multiple objectives

This paper deals with the problem of determination of installation base-stock levels in a serial supply chain. The problem is treated first as a single-objective inventory-cost optimization problem, and subsequently as a multi-objective optimization problem by considering two cost components, namely, holding costs and shortage costs. Variants of genetic algorithms are proposed to determine the best base-stock levels in the single-objective case. All variants, especially random-key gene-wise genetic algorithm (RKGGA), show an excellent performance, in terms of convergence to the best base-stock levels across a variety of supply chain settings, with minimum computational effort. Heuristics to obtain base-stock levels are proposed, and heuristic solutions are introduced in the initial population of the RKGGA to expedite the convergence of the genetic search process. To deal with the multi-objective supply-chain inventory optimization problem, a simple multi-objective genetic algorithm is proposed to obtain a set of non-dominated solutions.     

Balancing exploration and exploitation with adaptive variation for evolutionary multi-objective optimization

Although recent studies have shown that evolutionary algorithms are effective tools for solving multi-objective optimization problems, their performances are often bottlenecked by the suitability of the evolutionary operators with respect to the optimization problem at hand and their corresponding parametric settings. To adapt the search dynamic of evolutionary operation in multi-objective optimization, this paper proposes an adaptive variation operator that exploits the chromosomal structure of binary representation and synergizes the function of crossover and mutation. The overall search ability is deterministically tuned online to maintain a balance between extensive exploration and local fine-tuning at different stages of the evolutionary search. Also, the coordination between the two variation operators is achieved by means of an adaptive control that ensures an efficient exchange of information between the different chromosomal sub-structures throughout the evolutionary search. Extensive comparative studies with several representative variation operators are performed on different benchmark problems and significant algorithmic performance improvements in terms of proximity, uniformity and diversity are obtained with the incorporation of the proposed adaptive variation operator into the evolutionary multi-objective optimization process.     

顺序相依拆卸线平衡多目标优化模型及算法研究

拆卸是产品回收过程最关键环节之一,拆卸效率直接影响再制造成本。本文在分析现有模型不足基础上,考虑最小化总拆卸时间,建立多目标顺序相依拆卸线平衡问题优化模型,并提出了一种自适应进化变邻域搜索算法。所提算法引入种群进化机制,并采用一种组合策略构建初始种群,通过锦标赛法选择个体进化;在局部搜索时,设计了邻域结构自适应选择策略,并采用基于交叉的全局学习机制加速跳出局部最优,以提高算法寻优能力。对比实验结果,证实了所提模型的合理性以及算法的高效性。     

Hybrid approach for Pareto front expansion in heuristics

Heuristic search can be an effective multi-objective optimization tool; however, the required frequent function evaluations can exhaust computational sources. This paper explores using a hybrid approach with statistical interpolation methods to expand optimal solutions obtained by multiple criteria heuristic search. The goal is to significantly increase the number of Pareto optimal solutions while limiting computational effort. The interpolation approaches studied are kriging and general regression neural networks. This paper develops a hybrid methodology combining an interpolator with a heuristic, and examines performance on several non-linear bi-objective example problems. Computational experience shows this approach successfully expands and enriches the Pareto fronts of multi-objective optimization problems.     

An improved NSGA-III algorithm based on elimination operator for many-objective optimization

Due to the low selection pressure of the Pareto-dominance relation and the ineffectivity of diversity maintenance schemes in the environmental selection, the classical Pareto-dominance based multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) fail to handle many-objective optimization problems. The recently presented non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm III (NSGA-III) employs the uniformly distributed reference points to significantly promote population diversity, but the convergence based on the Pareto-dominance relation could still be enhanced. For this purpose, an improved NSGA-III algorithm based on elimination operator (NSGA-III-EO) is proposed. In the proposed algorithm, the elimination operator first identifies the reference point with maximum niche count and then employs the penalty-based boundary intersection distance to rank the individuals associated with it. To this end, the selection scheme is used to remove the worse individuals rather than to select the superior individuals. The proposed NSGA-III-EO is tested on a number of well-known benchmark problems with up to fifteen objectives and shows the competitive performance compared with five state-of-the-art MOEAs. Additionally, it is also tested on constrained problems having a large number of objectives and shows good performance.     

Fast calculation of multiobjective probability of improvement and expected improvement criteria for Pareto optimization

The use of surrogate based optimization (SBO) is widely spread in engineering design to reduce the number of computational expensive simulations. However, “real-world” problems often consist of multiple, conflicting objectives leading to a set of competitive solutions (the Pareto front). The objectives are often aggregated into a single cost function to reduce the computational cost, though a better approach is to use multiobjective optimization methods to directly identify a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, which can be used by the designer to make more efficient design decisions (instead of weighting and aggregating the costs upfront). Most of the work in multiobjective optimization is focused on multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs). While MOEAs are well-suited to handle large, intractable design spaces, they typically require thousands of expensive simulations, which is prohibitively expensive for the problems under study. Therefore, the use of surrogate models in multiobjective optimization, denoted as multiobjective surrogate-based optimization, may prove to be even more worthwhile than SBO methods to expedite the optimization of computational expensive systems. In this paper, the authors propose the efficient multiobjective optimization (EMO) algorithm which uses Kriging models and multiobjective versions of the probability of improvement and expected improvement criteria to identify the Pareto front with a minimal number of expensive simulations. The EMO algorithm is applied on multiple standard benchmark problems and compared against the well-known NSGA-II, SPEA2 and SMS-EMOA multiobjective optimization methods.     

A fast Pareto genetic algorithm approach for solving expensive multiobjective optimization problems

We present a new multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA), called fast Pareto genetic algorithm (FastPGA), for the simultaneous optimization of multiple objectives where each solution evaluation is computationally- and/or financially-expensive. This is often the case when there are time or resource constraints involved in finding a solution. FastPGA utilizes a new ranking strategy that utilizes more information about Pareto dominance among solutions and niching relations. New genetic operators are employed to enhance the proposed algorithm’s performance in terms of convergence behavior and computational effort as rapid convergence is of utmost concern and highly desired when solving expensive multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs). Computational results for a number of test problems indicate that FastPGA is a promising approach. FastPGA yields similar performance to that of the improved nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II), a widely-accepted benchmark in the MOEA research community. However, FastPGA outperforms NSGA-II when only a small number of solution evaluations are permitted, as would be the case when solving expensive MOPs.     

A new orthogonal evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition for multi-objective optimization

The diversity of solutions is very important for multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to deal with multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). In order to achieve the goal, a new orthogonal evolutionary algorithm based on objective space decomposition (OEA/D) is proposed in this paper. To be specific, the objective space of an MOP is firstly decomposed into a set of sub-regions via a set of direction vectors, and OEA/D maintains the diversity of solutions by making each sub-region have a solution to the maximum extent. Also, the quantization orthogonal crossover (QOX) is used to enhance the search ability of OEA/D. Experimental studies have been conducted to compare this proposed algorithm with classic MOEA/D, NSGAII, NICA and D2MOPSO. Simulation results on six multi-objective benchmark functions show that the proposed algorithm is able to obtain better diversity and more evenly distributed Pareto fronts than other four algorithms.     

A Hybrid Method for Solving the Multi-objective Assignment Problem

Most of the well known methods for solving multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems deal with only two objectives. In this paper, we develop a metaheuristic method for solving multi-objective assignment problems with three or more objectives. This method is based on the dominance cost variant of the multi-objective simulated annealing (DCMOSA) and hybridizes neighborhood search techniques which consist of either a local search or a multi-objective branch and bound search (here the multi-objective branch and bound search is used as a local move to a fragment of a solution).     

A survey on multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for many-objective problems

Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) are well-suited for solving several complex multi-objective problems with two or three objectives. However, as the number of conflicting objectives increases, the performance of most MOEAs is severely deteriorated. How to improve MOEAs’ performance when solving many-objective problems, i.e. problems with four or more conflicting objectives, is an important issue since a large number of this type of problems exists in science and engineering; thus, several researchers have proposed different alternatives. This paper presents a review of the use of MOEAs in many-objective problems describing the evolution of the field, the methods that were developed, as well as the main findings and open questions that need to be answered in order to continue shaping the field.     

FEMOEA: a fast and efficient multi-objective evolutionary algorithm

A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm which can be applied to many nonlinear multi-objective optimization problems is proposed. Its aim is to quickly obtain a fixed size Pareto-front approximation. It adapts ideas from different multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, but also incorporates new devices. In particular, the search in the feasible region is carried out on promising areas (hyperspheres) determined by a radius value, which decreases as the optimization procedure evolves. This mechanism helps to maintain a balance between exploration and exploitation of the search space. Additionally, a new local search method which accelerates the convergence of the population towards the Pareto-front, has been incorporated. It is an extension of the local optimizer SASS and improves a given solution along a search direction (no gradient information is used). Finally, a termination criterion has also been proposed, which stops the algorithm if the distances between the Pareto-front approximations provided by the algorithm in three consecutive iterations are smaller than a given tolerance. To know how far two of those sets are from each other, a modification of the well-known Hausdorff distance is proposed. In order to analyze the algorithm performance, it has been compared to the reference algorithms NSGA-II and SPEA2 and the state-of-the-art algorithms MOEA/D and SMS-EMOA. Several quality indicators have been considered, namely, hypervolume, average distance, additive epsilon indicator, spread and spacing. According to the computational tests performed, the new algorithm, named FEMOEA, outperforms the other algorithms.     

A hybrid optimization technique coupling an evolutionary and a local search algorithm

Evolutionary algorithms are robust and powerful global optimization techniques for solving large-scale problems that have many local optima. However, they require high CPU times, and they are very poor in terms of convergence performance. On the other hand, local search algorithms can converge in a few iterations but lack a global perspective. The combination of global and local search procedures should offer the advantages of both optimization methods while offsetting their disadvantages. This paper proposes a new hybrid optimization technique that merges a genetic algorithm with a local search strategy based on the interior point method. The efficiency of this hybrid approach is demonstrated by solving a constrained multi-objective mathematical test-case.     

A preference-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm R-NSGA-II with stochastic local search

Incorporation of a decision maker’s preferences into multi-objective evolutionary algorithms has become a relevant trend during the last decade, and several preference-based evolutionary algorithms have been proposed in the literature. Our research is focused on improvement of a well-known preference-based evolutionary algorithm R-NSGA-II by incorporating a local search strategy based on a single agent stochastic approach. The proposed memetic algorithm has been experimentally evaluated by solving a set of well-known multi-objective optimization benchmark problems. It has been experimentally shown that incorporation of the local search strategy has a positive impact to the quality of the algorithm in the sense of the precision and distribution evenness of approximation.     

An efficient multi-objective PSO algorithm assisted by Kriging metamodel for expensive black-box problems

The huge computational overhead is the main challenge in the application of community based optimization methods, such as multi-objective particle swarm optimization and multi-objective genetic algorithm, to deal with the multi-objective optimization involving costly simulations. This paper proposes a Kriging metamodel assisted multi-objective particle swarm optimization method to solve this kind of expensively black-box multi-objective optimization problems. On the basis of crowding distance based multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm, the new proposed method constructs Kriging metamodel for each expensive objective function adaptively, and then the non-dominated solutions of the metamodels are utilized to guide the update of particle population. To reduce the computational cost, the generalized expected improvements of each particle predicted by metamodels are presented to determine which particles need to perform actual function evaluations. The suggested method is tested on 12 benchmark functions and compared with the original crowding distance based multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II algorithm. The test results show that the application of Kriging metamodel improves the search ability and reduces the number of evaluations. Additionally, the new proposed method is applied to the optimal design of a cycloid gear pump and achieves desirable results.     

A multiobjective immune algorithm based on a multiple-affinity model

This paper presents a new multiobjective immune algorithm based on a multiple-affinity model inspired by immune system (MAM-MOIA). The multiple-affinity model builds the relationship model among main entities and concepts in multiobjective problems (MOPs) and multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs), including feasible solution, variable space, objective space, Pareto-optimal set, ranking and crowding distance. In the model, immune operators including clonal proliferation, hypermutation and immune suppression are designed to proliferate superior antibodies and suppress the inferiors. MAM-MOIA is compared with NSGA-II, SPEA2 and NNIA in solving the ZDT and DTLZ standard test problems. The experimental study based on three performance metrics including coverage of two sets, convergence and spacing proves that MAM-MOIA is effective for solving MOPs.