Counselling following the Prenatal Diagnosis of Klinefelter Syndrome: Comparisons between Geneticists and Obstetricians in Five European Countries

Objective: To describe and compare the information obstetricians and geneticists in five European countries report they would give following the prenatal diagnosis of Klinefelter syndrome. Methods: 388 obstetricians and 269 geneticists from Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the UK completed a brief questionnaire assessing two variables: the information they reported providing to parents following the prenatal diagnosis of Klinefelter syndrome (categorized as positive or negative); and their perceptions of the quality of life with the condition. Results: Geneticists were more likely than obstetricians to report providing more positive than negative information about Klinefelter syndrome than equal amounts of positive and negative information or more negative than positive information about the condition (excess positive information). Regardless of specialty, the information that health professionals reported providing was predicted by their perceptions of the quality of life with the condition, and the country from which they came. Those perceiving quality of life as greater were more likely to provide an excess positive information, as were health professionals from Germany and the UK. Conclusions: These results suggest that the information parents across Europe receive after the prenatal diagnosis of Klinefelter syndrome varies according to the specialty and country of the health professionals consulted, and their perceptions of quality of life with the condition. This variation seems to reflect personal, cultural and professional differences between health professionals. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel     

Information-seeking behaviour and psycho-social interactions during the genetic testing process

OBJECTIVES: The first aim of this study was to investigate the information-seeking behaviour (ISB) of women attending cancer genetic consultations at which the possibility of BRCA testing is considered. We focused here specifically on ISB apart from the cancer genetic consultation, i.e. on what complementary sources of information about genetic testing were consulted and what factors were involved in this behaviour. The second aim was to study the role of the social network used by the patients to collect various opinions on which to base their decisions about being tested. METHODS: A prospective cohort study (2000-2002) was therefore carried out on all women attending a single cancer genetic clinic in France after a BRCA1/2 analysis had been proposed. Closed questionnaires were administered before and after the second cancer genetic consultation. The purpose of this consultation was to confirm the patient's decision to be tested. RESULTS: Results were analysed in 108 subjects (mean age 47 years, SD 11 years; 74% affected by breast/ovarian cancer). Prior to the 2nd consultation, 35.2% of the women had actively looked for information about BRCA1/2 testing, as compared to 25.0% afterwards. After multivariate adjustment by logistic regression, the pre-consultation ISB was found to be associated with greater satisfaction with the information about the psycho-social consequences of genetic testing [adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.06] (scale from 0 to 100) and about the certainty of being a gene carrier (ORadj 3.04, 95% CI 1.16-7.98). Those who actively looked for complementary information were also more often accompanied at the consultation by a family member (ORadj 4.82, 95% CI 1.85-12.56). The other variables tested (depression, coping, socio-demographic and medical characteristics) were not significant (p > 0.05). The role of the social network in the decision making process was perceived as being less helpful when the persons consulted tended to have neutral or unfavourable opinions about genetic testing. CONCLUSIONS: Few women actively sought complementary information about BRCA genetic testing in addition to the cancer genetic consultation. Those who did so differed from the others in terms of their social network and their satisfaction with the consultation. The cancer geneticist is the key actor in women's decision making about genetic testing.     

Triple Test Screening for Down Syndrome: Looking Back on a False-Positive Result and Having or Not Having a Triple Test in Subsequent Pregnancies

Objectives: It was the main aim of the present retrospective study carried out in Flanders to evaluate how women with a false-positive triple test result look back on their experience and decision making and how many of them make use of the triple test in subsequent pregnancies. Methods: All 508 women tested in the Centre for Human Genetics in Leuven in 1995 who had a positive triple test result followed by a normal amniocentesis outcome were invited to participate in a mailed questionnaire study with open and multiple choice questions in 1998. The response rate was 68%. Results: The answers to the multiple choice question assessing how they look back on their initial expectations regarding the exact meaning of the triple test revealed that less than one half reported that it concerned the identification of 'a higher risk of carrying a child with Down syndrome (DS)'. Reporting correct initial expectations was significantly associated with a higher education level. The same holds for indecisiveness regarding pregnancy termination should the amniocentesis have detected a fetus with DS. As expected, a large majority of the women reported a high level of distress or worry after the communication of the positive triple test result. Overall the findings show that retrospectively most women had the feeling that the decision to have amniocentesis was their own decision rather than a professional's. Of the subgroup with one or more subsequent pregnancies 70% had another triple test. Conclusions: The overall results of this study clearly reveal a need for a systematic approach aimed at better informing and counselling pregnant women about the implications and limitations of the triple test. Notwithstanding the reported high level of distress caused by a positive triple test result, a large majority of the women with subsequent pregnancies had another triple test; they represent a clearly higher percentage than in another recent study. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel     

High distress in parents whose children undergo predictive testing for long QT syndrome

OBJECTIVES: To assess the psychological effect of predictive testing in parents of children at risk for long QT syndrome (LQTS) in a prospective study. METHODS: After their child was clinically screened by electrocardiography and blood was taken for DNA analysis, and shortly after delivery of the DNA test result, 36 parents completed measures of psychological distress. RESULTS: 24 parents were informed that at least one of their children is a mutation carrier. Up to 50% of the parents of carrier children showed clinically relevant high levels of distress. Parents who were familiar with the disease for a longer time, who had more experiences with the disease in their family and who received positive test results for all their children were most distressed. CONCLUSIONS: Predictive ECG testing together with DNA testing has a profound impact on parents whose minors undergo predictive testing for LQTS.     

Knowledge about medical genetics in health care

Effective genetic services depend upon co-operation between medical geneticists and many different non-geneticist professionals to ensure that the most appropriate patients are referred to geneticists and that those that require long-term care receive it. Important determinants of the quality of genetic services are the knowledge that professionals have about clinical genetics and the equitable distribution of adequately resourced genetic centres. Consequently, we have investigated in a European context how much clinically relevant genetics non-geneticists know, how competent non-geneticists are in counselling their own patients, how well equipped specialist genetic centres are, who refers to genetic centres and what they refer and who offers continuing care to patients and families whose problems are not resolvable at a limited genetic clinic visit.     

Genetics and congenital malformations: interpretations, attitudes and practices in suburban communities and the shamans of ecuador

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present article was to evaluate how shamans and the suburban communities of Quito interpret the terminology used in genetics. METHODS: One hundred people living in 5 suburban districts of Quito were surveyed as well as 19 shamans of the Salasaca community. RESULTS: The results show that members of both groups are little informed about genetics. As knowledge about genetics is correlated to educational level, which is very poor in both groups, knowledge and understanding of genetics are either very basic or nonexistent. As for the medical practices in treating genetic alterations, the surveys show that while in very severe cases scientific medicine is sought, in most cases explanations and a cure are given by shamanic medicine. CONCLUSION: There is limited knowledge of genetics and its terminology in the study population. Shamanic and marginal health practices seem to remain prevalent in these communities due to their low costs, the personal attention the individuals receive, and the holistic point of view employed. It is important that the community councils, the medical doctors and the shamans work together to set up community programs on medical education, particularly on genetics.     

Assessment of family cancer history collection and utilization in patient care

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to determine whether patients and accompanying persons visiting the Gynecologic Oncology Clinic were aware if a family cancer history was recorded and utilized in their medical care; whether they were aware of the importance of a family cancer history, and whether they would like to learn more about familial cancer. METHODS: Sixteen- and 17-item self-report questionnaires were administered to patients and their accompanying persons, respectively, who were visiting the Gynecologic Oncology Clinic. All responses were anonymous. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-four patient questionnaires and 114 accompanying person questionnaires were completed. Seventy-eight percent of the patients and 70% of the accompanying persons replied that a physician had inquired about their family history of cancer. Only 40% of those patients and 70% of those accompanying persons (31 and 49% of total patients and accompanying persons, respectively) replied that the inquiry was by their family physician. Sixty-seven percent of these patients and 63% of these accompanying persons reported that a written record was made of the family history. Thirty-one percent of the patients and 28% of accompanying persons knew that their family cancer history information had been used to aid in their medical care. Eighty-eight percent of the patients and 83% of the accompanying persons reported the occurrence of at least one relative with cancer; however, only 44% of the patients and 35% of the accompanying persons replied that a health care provider had ever provided teaching about the importance of a family cancer history. Seventy-five percent of the patients and 73% of the accompanying persons indicated that they would like to learn more about hereditary cancer and cancer genetics. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that patients desire information about cancer genetics and hereditary cancer. Therefore, health care providers should provide better education and information to their patients as well as improve their family history-taking skills.     

Women's experiences of undergoing BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing: organisation of the German Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Consortium Survey and Preliminary Data from Münster

BACKGROUND: In order to promote safe and effective testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in clinical practice, a network of expert centres in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer ('Verbundprojekt famili?rer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs'; German Consortium on Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer) has been established by the Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid). To improve practice, evaluations based upon the views of patients who have undergone testing concerning the impact of the genetic diagnosis and the quality of the services they receive and require are undertaken. METHODS: Herein, we first describe the protocols for interdisciplinary pre- and post-test counselling and for molecular diagnostics, then the feedback from the patients undergoing testing. Women and men who had obtained their test results at least 6 months earlier were interviewed using a questionnaire including open and standardised questions at 11 participating centres in 2002-2003. Reported here are the survey protocol and preliminary data from interviews with women conducted by the centre based at the University of Münster's Medical School in 2002 (n = 46). RESULTS: Compared to international guidelines, the Consortium's protocols provide more specifically outlined indications based on the mutation frequencies observed in the German population for families that should be offered interdisciplinary counselling and genetic testing. The data from the Münster survey suggest that there is little regret regarding the decision to undergo testing and that the vast majority of women would undergo the test again. However, women with positive findings experienced more problems than women with negative results. They were less prone to recommend the test and to communicate the tests results in their family compared to women with negative test results. Communication of test results within the family was characterised by preferential information of female family members. CONCLUSION: BRCA1/2 testing should be provided within a framework that ensures harmonisation and standardisation of services and that protects users. Women and men with positive test results may need special support from counsellors on how to handle test results in their families. Strategies need to be developed and evaluated on how to help stimulate and facilitate the dissemination of information within families without potentially 'overstraining' the 'messenger patient', at least when a mutation has been identified.     

Family communication about genetic risk: the little that is known

Although family communication is important in clinical genetics only a small number of studies have specifically explored the passing on of genetic knowledge to family members. In addition, many of these present exploratory or tentative findings based upon small sample sizes, or data collected only a short time after testing. Nevertheless, if health professionals are to develop effective strategies to help patients' deal with communication issues, we need to know more about what actually happens in families. The aim of this commentary is to identify factors which appear to influence whether patients share information about genetic risk with relatives who are unaware of that risk, with whom they share it and how they go about it. The paper draws upon evidence and thinking from the disciplines of psychology (including family therapy), sociology, medicine and genetic counselling. It is presented under the following headings: disease factors, individual factors, family factors and sociocultural factors. It concludes by highlighting a number of key issues which are relevant for health professionals.     

BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: living with susceptibility

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether being a BRCA1/2 mutation carrier affects a wide array of aspects of life, and if so, how. METHODS: Participants were grouped according to their carrier status (carrier and noncarrier status), health status (affected or unaffected by cancer), and their enrollment at the counseling service (probands and other family members). One hundred and sixty-five women completed a self-administered questionnaire following their genetic consultation session. RESULTS: Probands/nonprobands and carriers/noncarriers did not differ with regard to demographic characteristics, health behaviors including medical checkups, the distress they experience or their resources (sense of coherence, social integration, religiosity). Individuals affected by cancer did differ on some of these aspects from participants without cancer. CONCLUSIONS: From the results of this study, being a carrier could not be considered a psychosocial risk factor, nor does it seem to have an effect on carriers' resources and lifestyle.     

Public experiences, knowledge and expectations about medical genetics and the use of genetic information

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were (1) to explore public experiences, genetic knowledge, expectations of future medical genetic developments, and the attitudes towards the use of genetic information, and (2) to determine whether there are subject characteristics associated with these variables. METHODS: Participants (n = 1,308, age > or = 25 years) of a Dutch consumer panel were sent a questionnaire, specifically designed for this study. RESULTS: Response was 63% (817/1,308). A minority of respondents reported to know someone with a hereditary disease (34%) or to have used a genetic test (8%). Overall, 57% perceived a lack of genetic knowledge. In multivariate analyses, high self-rated knowledge, younger age, having heard of genetic testing, high educational level, female gender, having children living at home, being a health professional, and familiarity with genetic testing were positively associated with genetic knowledge. Future expectations of the consequences of developments in medical genetics varied between the subjects. The great majority expected great benefits for medical practice such as an increasing use of genetic aspects of disease for diagnosis or prevention. One fifth, mainly older people, anticipated a negative impact of genetic developments on society. The results also show that most people are reserved to share their genetic information with others, especially with regard to the wider public domain (e.g. industry and insurers) and employers. Remarkably, respondents were more willing to share their genetic information with scientific researchers (68%) than with their relatives (54%). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that although one fifth anticipates negative consequences of genetic developments, the great majority has high expectations about the increasing use of genetics in prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diseases. In developing educational programmes about genetic innovations in medicine, policymakers will have to take into account pre-existing lay knowledge, views and expectations of different groups of citizens towards these developments.     

Parental attitudes and beliefs regarding the genetic testing of children

OBJECTIVES: To explore parental attitudes and beliefs about genetic testing of children for conditions that present throughout the life cycle. METHODS: Twelve semi-structured focus groups with black and white parents were conducted. RESULTS: Across racial groups, most respondents want access to genetic testing and believe that parents should be the final decision-makers. While most respondents believe it is important to share genetic information with relatives, white respondents want physicians to respect confidentiality absolutely, whereas some black respondents accept physician disclosures in specific situations. CONCLUSIONS: Professional policy statements are restrictive about access to predictive genetic testing of children. This conflicts with parental attitudes about who should have decisional authority. While there is consensus among respondents that genetic information should be shared with relatives, respondents disagree as to who should be responsible for disclosure, and when professionals should breach patient confidentiality.     

Age at postnatal diagnosis of down syndrome in the northern Netherlands for the period 1981-2000

BACKGROUND: In live-born children with Down syndrome it may be very difficult for the clinician or midwife assisting at the delivery to recognise Down syndrome in newborn babies due to varying physical appearances. Meanwhile more and more therapeutical interventions become available that should start early in life. We were interested in the age at the postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome, and found no literature on the subject. METHODS: We studied the age at the diagnosis of Down syndrome for live-born babies born in the period of 1981-2000 and registered by the European Registration of Congenital Anomalies in the northern part of The Netherlands. RESULTS: For 289 children, data on the age at the postnatal diagnosis were available, in 70.8% of whom there was suspicion of DS on the day of birth. In 1.7% of the cases, the diagnosis was made after 1 year. Place of birth and the specialty of the health worker assisting at the delivery were associated with age at diagnosis. When the child was delivered at hospital, 96.4% of the Down syndrome cases had been diagnosed within 1 month compared to 81.3% following home delivery. CONCLUSION: In some cases of Down syndrome in live-born babies, the diagnosis is made only after months or a year. The diagnosis was made faster in babies born in hospital compared to those born at home.     

Symmetry Properties of the Elastic Energy of a Woven Fabric with Bending and Twisting Resistance

A woven fabric can be described as a surface made of two families of fibers: in this work we study how the geometry of the weave pattern affects the symmetry properties of the elastic energy of the surface. Four basic symmetry classes of weave patterns are possible, depending on the angle between the fibers and their material properties. The properties of the pattern determine the material symmetry group of the network, under which the elastic energy is invariant. We derive representations for the energy of a woven fabric that are invariant under the symmetry group of the network, and discuss the relation of these invariants with the curvature and twist of the fibers.      

Effects of individual and family functioning on interest in genetic testing

OBJECTIVE: The present study reports on the important issue of how family communication and support regarding breast cancer risk affects interest in genetic testing and mental health. METHODS: Participants (n = 221) were women aged 18-74 who had at least one relative of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, no personal history of breast or ovarian cancer, and lived within 60 miles of Seattle, Wash. RESULTS: Communication about breast cancer risk was reported with very low frequency across all types of relatives. Women talked with their mothers and sisters more often than their fathers, brothers, or children. The only significant predictor of interest in genetic testing was the individual level variable of seeking social support. CONCLUSION: Social support needs might be a part of the genetic testing process.     

Consumer perspectives on genetic testing, research and services for ethnoculturally diverse populations

A panel of individuals from diverse ethnocultural backgrounds and representing a variety of genetic disorders presented their consumer perspectives on genetic programs, testing and services. Their remarks emphasized how misunderstanding and miscommunication between health care professionals and many of the populations for whom they provide services can lead to unfilled genetic service needs. Panelists recommended that health care professionals become more aware and knowledgeable about the diversity of customs, beliefs and cultures of those receiving their services. Only by building a foundation of trust and mutual respect will genetic testing, research and services become more accessible to individuals from diverse populations, their families and their communities.     

Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations

OBJECTIVE: New medical discoveries regarding genetic susceptibility to common chronic diseases, and the decoding of the human genome have increased public attention to genetics. What information is understood and what attitudes exist towards genetics and genetic research have not been well examined in underserved, culturally diverse communities. METHODS: To better understand attitudes and beliefs towards genetics and genetic testing in these groups, we conducted eight focus groups with 55 patients and health care workers in New York City and Westchester, N.Y., in English, Spanish, and Chinese. RESULTS: Focus group participants had limited understanding about genetics or genetic testing. Newborn screening was the least-known genetic issue, even among health care workers. Regardless of their cultural group, most participants expressed a desire for more information about genetics and genetic tests. Latinos and Chinese participants generally expressed positive attitudes towards genetic studies and genetic testing, with the possibility of preventing diseases cited as the main advantage. Black Americans and Non-Hispanic Whites reported mixed feelings about genetic research and genetic testing. Concerns expressed included: anxiety before receiving test results or waiting for a disease to develop, fear of genetic discrimination by health and life insurance companies and employers, not having the financial means to deal with genetic diseases in themselves or a sick child, concern that children and adults are having too many tests. Black Americans expressed the most concern for possibly harmful use of genetic information. CONCLUSIONS: Minority populations of diverse cultures have limited knowledge about genetics and genetic testing, would like to have more information, and are not well reached by the current educational approaches. Participants knew the least about newborn screening, a test that is mandatory in the New York State. While genetic knowledge by minority populations was perhaps not different from the level of knowledge of consumers in general, minority populations are at particular risk of being left behind because of historically poor access to information and services.     

Down syndrome and parity

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of parity on Down syndrome (DS). METHODS: The study was conducted on data from Northeast Italy (NEI) (1981-1996) and Sicily (ISMAC) (1991-1996) Congenital Malformation Registries. In these areas, all DS births are recorded and confirmed by chromosomal analysis; the NEI Registry also registers pregnancy terminations (TOPs) after prenatal diagnosis of DS. In order to estimate the effect of parity independently of the mother's age and to reduce the truncation effect, different age classes and three classes of parity (1, 2-4, >4) were defined. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 1,088 consecutive newborns and 169 consecutive fetuses affected by DS. In both NEI and ISMAC samples, we found a significantly increased risk of having a DS child for multiparas > or =35 years of age. In the NEI sample, the inclusion of TOP data did not seem to modify this finding. In the ISMAC sample, a significantly reduced risk for primiparas was found at all ages. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm a higher risk of having a DS child in women with parity >4. As this effect is evident only in women > or =35 years age, its practical impact is null because these women are usually offered prenatal diagnosis in any case. However, the mechanisms involved, if this association is true, are very intriguing and the observation should stimulate scientific studies allowing a better knowledge of the nondisjunction mechanism.