Ligand‐Modification Effects on the Reactivity,Solubility, and Stability of Organometallic Tantalum Complexes in Water

Tantalum complexes [TaCp*Me{κ⁴‐C,N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(CH₂NMe₂)?CH)py}] ( 4 ) and [TaCp*Me{κ⁴‐C,N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(CH₂NH₂)?CH)py}] ( 5 ), which contain modified alkoxide pincer ligands, were synthesized from the reactions of [TaCp*Me{κ³‐N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCH)py}] (Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅) with HC?CCH₂NMe₂ and HC?CCH₂NH₂, respectively. The reactions of [TaCp*Me{κ⁴‐C,N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(Ph)?CH)py}] ( 2 ) and [TaCp*Me{κ⁴‐C,N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(SiMe₃)?CH)py}] ( 3 ) with triflic acid (1:2 molar ratio) rendered the corresponding bis‐triflate derivatives [TaCp*(OTf)₂{κ³‐N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(Ph)?CH₂)py}] ( 6 ) and [TaCp*(OTf)₂{κ³‐N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(SiMe₃)?CH₂)py}] ( 7 ), respectively. Complex 4 reacted with triflic acid in a 1:2 molar ratio to selectively yield the water‐soluble cationic complex [TaCp*(OTf){κ⁴‐C,N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(CH₂NHMe₂)?CH)py}]OTf ( 8 ). Compound 8 reacted with water to afford the hydrolyzed complex [TaCp*(OH)(H₂O){κ³‐N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(CH₂NHMe₂)?CH₂)py}](OTf)₂ ( 9 ). Protonation of compound 8 with triflic acid gave the new tantalum compound [TaCp*(OTf){κ⁴‐C,N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(HOCHC(CH₂NHMe₂)?CH)py}](OTf)₂ ( 10 ), which afforded the corresponding protonolysis derivative [TaCp*(OTf)₂{κ³‐N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(HOCHC(CH₂NHMe₂)?CH₂)py}](OTf) ( 11 ) in solution. Complex 8 reacted with CNtBu and potassium 2‐isocyanoacetate to give the corresponding iminoacyl derivatives 12 and 13 , respectively. The molecular structures of complexes 5 , 7 , and 10 were established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies.     

Complexes of N‐Thiophosphorylthiourea α‐NaphthylNHC(S)NHP(S)(OiPr)2 (HL) with Copper(I). Crystal Structures of HL and Cu(PPh3)2L

Reaction of the potassium salt of N‐thiophosphorylated thiourea α‐naphthylNHC(S)NHP(S)(OiPr)₂ ( HL ) with Cu(PPh₃)₃I in aqueous EtOH/CH₂Cl₂ leads to the mononuclear complex [Cu(PPh₃)₂L–S,S′]. By using copper(I) iodide instead ofCu(PPh₃)₃I, the polynuclear complex [Cu_n(L–S,S′)_n] was obtained. The structures of these compounds were investigated by elemental analysis, ¹H and ³¹P{¹H} NMR and IR spectroscopy. The crystal structures of HL and Cu(PPh₃)₂L were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Tridentate Lewis Acids Based on 1,3,5‐Trisilacyclohexane Backbones and an Example of Their Host–Guest Chemistry

Directed tridentate Lewis acids based on the 1,3,5‐trisilacyclohexane skeleton with three ethynyl groups [CH₂Si(Me)(C₂H)]₃ were synthesised and functionalised by hydroboration with HB(C₆F₅)₂, yielding the ethenylborane {CH₂Si(Me)[C₂H₂B(C₆F₅)₂]}₃, and by metalation with gallium and indium organyls affording {CH₂Si(Me)[C₂M(R)₂]}₃ (M=Ga, In, R=Me, Et). In the synthesis of the backbone the influence of substituents (MeO, EtO and iPrO groups at Si) on the orientation of the methyl group was studied with the aim to increase the abundance of the all‐cis isomer. New compounds were identified by elemental analyses, multi‐nuclear NMR spectroscopy and in some cases by IR spectroscopy. Crystal structures were obtained for cis‐trans‐[CH₂Si(Me)(Cl)]₃, all‐cis‐[CH₂Si(Me)(H)]₃, all‐cis‐[CH₂Si(Me)(C₂H)]₃, cis‐trans‐[CH₂Si(Me)(C₂H)]₃ and all‐cis‐[CH₂Si(Me)(C₂SiMe₃)]₃. A gas‐phase electron diffraction experiment for all‐cis‐[CH₂Si(Me)(C₂H)]₃ provides information on the relative stabilities of the all‐equatorial and all‐axial form; the first is preferred in both solid and gas phase. The gallium‐based Lewis acid {CH₂Si(Me)[C₂Ga(Et)₂]}₃ was reacted with a tridentate Lewis base (1,3,5‐trimethyl‐1,3,5‐triazacyclohexane) in an NMR titration experiment. The generated host–guest complexes involved in the equilibria during this reaction were identified by DOSY NMR spectroscopy by comparing measured diffusion coefficients with those of the suitable reference compounds of same size and shape.     

Water Soluble Gold(I)‐diacetyl‐1,3,5‐triaza‐7‐phosphaadamantane‐arylazoimidazole Complexes: Synthesis and Spectroscopic Study

Reaction of [Au(DAPTA)(Cl)] with RaaiR’ in CH2Cl2 medium following ligand addition leads to [Au(DAPTA)(RaaiR’)](Cl) [DAPTA＝diacetyl-1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane, RaaiR’＝p-R-C6H4-N＝N- C3H2-NN-1-R’, (1—3), abbreviated as N,N’-chelator, where N(imidazole) and N(azo) represent N and N’, respectively; R＝H (a), Me (b), Cl (c) and R’＝Me (1), CH2CH3 (2), CH2Ph (3)]. The 1H NMR spectral measurements in D2O suggest methylene, CH2, in RaaiEt gives a complex AB type multiplet while in RaaiCH2Ph it shows AB type quartets. 13C NMR spectrum in D2O suggest the molecular skeleton. The 1H-1H COSY spectrum in D2O as well as contour peaks in the 1H-13C HMQC spectrum in D2O assign the solution structure.     

Copper(I) Complexes of Anionic Tridentate CNC Pincer Ligands

New monoanionic CNC pincer ligands, [N{SiMe₂CH₂(RIm)}₂]^– (R = tBu, iPr, Ph) featuring three different N-heterocyclic carbenes and a disilylamido moiety is reported. Treatment of the lithium salt of [N{SiMe₂CH₂(RIm)}₂]^– with Cu^IOTf afforded the corresponding copper complexes [N{SiMe₂CH₂(RIm)}₂]Cu in 41–56 % yield. X-ray crystal structures of [N{SiMe₂CH₂(RIm)}₂]Cu show that they are monomeric and feature three-coordinate, pseudo T-shaped copper(I) sites. The X-ray crystal structure of one of the precursor lithium complexes, [N{SiMe₂CH₂(tBuIm)}₂]Li is also presented.     

Synthesis of 2,2,5,5‐Tetrasubstituted 1,4‐Dioxa‐2,5‐disilacyclohexanes via Organotin(IV)‐Catalyzed Transesterification of (Acetoxymethyl)alkoxysilanes

(Acetoxymethyl)silanes 2 , 7 a – c , and 10 a – c with at least one alkoxy group, of the general formula (AcOCH₂)Si(OR)_3?n(CH₃)_n (R: Me, Et, iPr; n=0, 1, 2), were synthesized from the corresponding (chloromethyl)silanes 1 , 6 a – c , and 9 a – c by treatment with potassium acetate under phase‐transfer‐catalysis conditions. These compounds were found to provide 2,2,5,5‐organo‐substituted 1,4‐dioxa‐2,5‐disilacyclohexanes 3 , 8 a – c , and 11 a – c if treated with organotin(IV) catalysts such as dioctyltin oxide. The reaction proceeds through transesterification of the acetoxy and alkoxy units followed by ring‐closure to form a dimeric six‐membered ring. The corresponding alkyl acetates are formed as the reaction by‐products. With these mild conditions, the method overcomes the drawbacks of previously reported synthetic routes to furnish 2,2,5,5‐tetramethyl‐1,4‐dioxa‐2,5‐disilacyclohexane ( 3 ) and even allows the synthesis of 1,4‐dioxa‐2,5‐disilacyclohexanes bearing hydrolytically labile alkoxy substituents at the silicon atom in good yields and high purity. These new materials were fully characterized by NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, mass spectrometry, and X‐ray analysis (trans‐ 8 a ).     

An additional methylene group driving the conformation and assembly of two arylsulfonamide para‐alkoxychalcone hybrids

The structures of two arylsulfonamide para‐alkoxychalcones, namely, N‐{4‐[(E)‐3‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)prop‐2‐enoyl]phenyl}benzenesulfonamide, C₂₂H₁₉NO₄S, (I), and N‐{4‐[(E)‐3‐(4‐ethoxyphenyl)prop‐2‐enoyl]phenyl}benzenesulfonamide, C₂₃H₂₁NO₄S, (II), reveal the effect of the inclusion of one –CH₂– group between the CH₃ branch and the alkoxy O atom on the conformation and crystal structure. Although the molecular conformations and one‐dimensional chain motifs are the same in both structures, their crystallographic symmetry, number of independent molecules and crystal packing are different. The crystal packing of (I) is stabilized by weak C—H...π and π–π interactions, while only C—H...π contacts occur in the structure of (II). The role of the additional methylene group in the crystal packing can also be seen in the fact that the alkoxy O atom is an acceptor in nonclassical hydrogen bonds only in the para‐ethoxy analogue, (II). The remarkable similarity between the crystal packing features of (I) and (II) lies in the formation of N—H...O hydrogen‐bonded ribbons, a synthon commonly found in related compounds.     

New polyfunctional silicon-containing amines C6[CH2CH2SiMe(OCH2CH2NR2)2]6 (R = H,Me) and their reactions with cobalt(ii) chloride and dicobalt octacarbonyl

Hexakis[bis(2-aminoethoxy)methylsilylethyl]benzene and hexakis[bis(N,N-dimethyl-2-aminoethoxy)methylsilylethyl]benzene C₆[(NR₂CH₂CH₂O)₂SiMeCH₂CH₂]₆ (4, R = H; 5, R = Me) were prepared from hexakis(methyldichlorosilylethyl)benzene C₆(Cl₂MeSiCH₂CH₂)₆ and 2-aminoethanol or N,N-dimethyl-2-aminoethanol, respectively. Compounds 4 and 5 react with anhydrous cobalt (ii) chloride to give poorly soluble dodecachloro{hexakis[bis(2-aminoethoxy)methylsilylethyl]benzene}hexacobalt and dodecachloro{hexakis[bis(N,N-dimethyl-2-aminoethoxy)methylsilylethyl]benzene}hexacobalt {Co₆[(NR₂CH₂CH₂O)₂SiMeCH₂CH₂]₆C₆}Cl₁₂ (R = H or Me), respectively. Polyfunctional amine 4 reacts with dicobalt octacarbonyl to produce hexakis[bis(2-aminoethoxy)methylsilylethyl]benzenedicobalt(ii) tetrakis(tetracarbonylcobaltate) {Co₂[(NH₂CH₂CH₂O)₂SiMeCH₂CH₂]₆C₆}[Co(CO)₄]₄. N,N-Dimethyl-substituted polyfunctional amine 5 is lowly reactive in the reaction with Co₂(CO)₈, whereas the simplest model of this compound, viz., bis(N,N-dimethyl-2-aminoethoxy)dimethylsilane (NMe₂CH₂CH₂O)₂SiMe₂, slowly reacts with Co₂(CO)₈ to give tris[bis(N,N-dimethyl-2-aminoethoxy)dimethylsilane]cobalt(ii) bis(tetracarbonylcobaltate) {Co[(NMe₂CH₂CH₂O)₂SiMe₂]₃}[Co(CO)₄]₂. Thermal decomposition and transformations of the resulting complexes under the action of oxygen and water were studied.     

A urea adduct of bis(hinokitiolato)copper(II)

Bis(μ₂‐3‐isopropyl‐7‐oxocyclohepta‐1,3,5‐trien‐1‐olato)bis[(3‐isopropyl‐7‐oxocyclohepta‐1,3,5‐trien‐1‐olato)copper(II)]–urea–acetone (1/6/2), [Cu₂(C₁₀H₁₁O₂)₄]·6CH₄N₂O·2C₃H₆O, where 3‐isopropyl‐7‐oxocyclohepta‐1,3,5‐trien‐1‐olate is the systematic name for the hinokitiolate anion, contains three novel structural features. First, it contains a bis(hinokitiolato)copper(II) dimer, [Cu(hino)₂]₂, unlike any other, demonstrating that linkage isomerism is another avenue by which Cu(hino)₂ can transmute from one form to another. Second, [Cu(hino)₂]₂ is hydrogen bonded to two urea molecules, indicating that hydrogen bonding cannot yet be discounted from any proposed mechanism of action for the antimicrobial and antiviral properties of bis(hinokitiolato)copper(II). Finally, corrugated urea layers crosslinked by [Cu(hino)₂]₂ dimers are observed, suggesting that a new family of host–guest materials, i.e. metallo–urea clathrates, exists to challenge our understanding of crystal engineering and crystal growth and design. Selected details of the structure are that the [Cu(hino)₂]₂ dimers possess crystallographic inversion symmetry, the Cu atoms have square‐pyramidal coordination geometries, the basal Cu—O bonds are in the range 1.916 (2)–1.931 (2) Å, the apical Cu—O bond length is 2.582 (2) Å, the hinokitiolate bite angles are in the range 83.41 (7)–83.96 (8)°, the urea–Cu(hino)₂ interactions have an R₂²(8) motif, and the urea layers result from the close packing of R₈⁶(28) `butterflies' and R<sub>8</sub><sup>6</sup>(24) `strips of tape'.     

Synthesis,crystal structures and characterizations of three new copper(II) complexes including anti‐inflammatory diclofenac

Three new diclofenac‐based copper(II) complexes, namely tetrakis{μ‐2‐[2‐(2,6‐dichloroanilino)phenyl]acetato‐κ²O:O′}bis(methanol‐κO)copper(II), [Cu₂(μ‐dicl)₄(CH₃OH)₂] ( 1 ), bis{2‐[2‐(2,6‐dichloroanilino)phenyl]acetato‐κ²O,O′}bis(1‐vinyl‐1H‐imidazole‐κN³)copper(II), [Cu(dicl)₂(vim)₂] ( 2 ), and bis{2‐[2‐(2,6‐dichloroanilino)phenyl]acetato‐κ²O,O′}bis(1H‐imidazole‐κN³)copper(II), [Cu(dicl)₂(im)₂] ( 3 ) [dicl is diclofenac (C₁₄H₁₀Cl₂NO₂), vim is 1‐vinylimidazole (C₅H₆N₂) and im is imidazole (C₃H₄N₂)], have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, FT–IR spectroscopy, thermal analysis and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. X‐ray diffraction analysis shows that complex 1 consists of dimeric units in which the dicl ligand exhibits a bidentate syn,syn‐μ₂ coordination mode linking two copper(II) centres. Complexes 2 and 3 have mononuclear units with the general formula [Cu(dicl)₂L₂] (L is vim or im) in which the Cu^II ions are octahedrally coordinated by two L and two dicl chelating ligands. The L and dicl ligands both occupy the trans positions of the coordination octahedron. The different coordination modes of dicl in the title complexes were revealed by Fourier transform IR (FT–IR) spectroscopy. The spin matching between the copper(II) centres in the dimeric [Cu₂(μ‐dicl)₄(CH₃OH)₂] units was also confirmed by magnetic data to be lower than the spin‐only value and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra. The thermal properties of the complexes were investigated by thermogravimetric (TG) and differential thermal analysis (DTA) techniques.     

New dithiazinanes and bis‐dithiazinanes‐bearing pendant ethylamines: Structure and reactivity

The structure and reactivity of a series of new ethylaminedithiazinanes and bis‐diethylaminedithiazinanes synthesized from formaldehyde, NaSH, and N,N‐dimethyl‐ethylene‐diamine ( 1 ), N‐methyl‐ethylene‐diamine ( 2 ), and N‐ethyl‐ethylene‐diamine ( 3 ) are reported. Compound 1 afforded 2‐([1,3,5]‐dithiazinan‐5‐yl)‐ethylene‐N,N‐dimethyl‐amine ( 4 ). The reaction of 4 with dry CH₂Cl₂ gave N‐{2‐([1,3,5]dithiazinan‐5‐yl)‐ethylene}‐N‐chloromethyl‐N,N‐dimethyl‐ammonium chloride ( 5 ) in high yield, whereas in wet CH₂Cl₂ and DMSO provided a mixture of 5 with N‐{2‐([1,3,5]‐dithiazinan‐5‐yl)‐ethylene}‐N,N‐dimethyl‐ammonium hydrochloride ( 6 ).bis‐{2‐([1,3,5]‐Dithiazinan‐5‐yl)‐ethylene‐N‐alkyl‐amino}‐methylene‐disulfides ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) formed by two dithiazinanes linked through the chain  (CH₂)₂ NRCH₂ S S CH₂ NR (CH₂)₂‐ ( 7 R = methyl, 8 R = ethyl) reacted with CH₂Cl₂ giving after neutralization of the hydrolysis products the ethylaminedithiazinanes with different pendant N‐groups [ (CH₂)₂NMeH₂⁺( 9 );  (CH₂)₂NEtH₂⁺ ( 10 );  (CH₂)₂NMeH ( 11 );  (CH₂)₂NEtH ( 12 );  (CH₂)₂NMeHBH₃ ( 13 )  (CH₂)₂NEtHBH₃ ( 14 ).  (CH₂)₂NMe₂BH₃ ( 15 ), and  (CH₂)₂NEtMeBH₃.( 16 )]. The x‐ray diffraction analyses of compounds 5 , 6 , 9 , and 10 are reported. Variable temperature NMR experiments afforded the Δ G^≠ of the ring interconversion of the six‐membered heterocycles 6 , 9 , and 10 . © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 22:59–71, 2011; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com . DOI 10.1002/hc.20657     

二（胍基）锆配合物的合成和表征

Addition of one equivalent of LiN（i-Pr）2 or LiN（CH2）5 to carbodiimides, RN=C=NR [R=cyclohexyl （Cy）, isopropyl （i-Pr）], generated the corresponding lithium of tetrasubstituted guanidinates {Li[RNC（N R^′2）NR]（THF）}2 [R=i-Pr, N R^′2=N（i-Pr）2 （1）, N（CH2）5 （2）; R=Cy, N R^′2=N（i-Pr）2 （3）, N（CH2）5 （4）]. Treatment of ZrCl4 with freshly prepared solutions of their lithium guanidinates provided a series of bis（guanidinate） complexes of Zr with the general formula Zr[RNC（N R^′2）NR]2Cl2 [R=i-Pr, N R^′2=N（i-Pr）2 （5）, N（CH2）5 （6）; R=Cy, N R^′2=N（i-Pr）2 （7）, N（CH2）5 （8）]. Complexes 1, 2, 5-8 were characterized by elemental analysis, IR and ^1H NMR spectra. The molecular structures of complexes 1, 7 and 8 were further determined by X-ray diffraction studies.     

Über Chalkogenolate. 129. Untersuchungen über Ester der N-Cyancarbamidsäure. 2. Darstellung,spektroskopische Charakterisierung und Zersetzung von O-Methyl- und O-Ethyl-N-cyancarbamat

On Chalcogenolates. 129. Studies on Esters of N-Cyancarbamic Acid. 2. Synthesis, Spectroscopic Characterization, and Decomposition of O-Methyl and O-Ethyl N-Cyancarbamate NH₄[NC? N? CO? OR], where R = CH₃ and C₂H₅, reacts with acids to yield unstable NC? NH? CO? OR. The esters decompose to form NC? N?C(NH₂)? NH? CO? OR. The compounds have been characterized by means of electron absorption, ¹H and ¹³C NMR, infrared, and mass spectra.     

Crystallographic report: Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel azanonaboranes as potential agents for boron neutron capture therapy

A number of (hydroxyalkylamine)‐N‐(aminoalkyl)azanonaborane(11) derivatives have been synthesized to provide azanonaboranes with different hydrophilic functional groups for use in the treatment of cancer by boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). The exo‐diamine group of (aminoalkylamine)‐N‐(aminoalkyl)azanonaborane(11) {H₂N(CH₂)_mH₂NB₈H₁₁NH(CH₂)_mNH₂, where m = 4–6} can be substituted by amino alcohol ligands {HO(CH₂)_nNH₂, where n = 3 and 4} to give azanonaboranes containing free amino and hydroxy groups: (3‐hydroxypropylamine)‐N‐(aminobutyl)azanonaborane(11) {HO(CH₂)₃H₂NB₈H₁₁NH(CH₂)₄NH₂}, 1 ; (4‐hydroxybutylamine)‐N‐ (aminobutyl)azanonaborane(11) {HO(CH₂)₄H₂NB₈H₁₁NH(CH₂)₄NH₂}, 2 ; (3‐hydroxypropylamine)‐N‐ (aminopentyl)azanonaborane(11) {HO(CH₂)₃H₂NB₈H₁₁NH(CH₂)₅NH₂}, 3 ; (4‐hydroxypropylamine)‐N‐(aminopentyl)azanonaborane(11) {HO(CH₂)₄H₂NB₈H₁₁NH(CH₂)₅NH₂}, 4 ; (3‐hydroxypropylamine)‐N‐(aminohexyl)azanonaborane(11) {HO(CH₂)₃H₂NB₈H₁₁NH(CH₂)₆NH₂}, 5 . The in vitro toxicity test using Chinese hamster‐V79 cells showed that compounds 1 – 3 were less toxic (LD₅₀ value of ～2.3, 1.7 and 1.4 mM , respectively) than spermine and spermidine (LD₅₀ value of ～0.88 and 0.66 mM , respectively). In vivo distribution experiments of these compounds in Lewis lung carcinoma and B16 melanoma tumor‐bearing mice showed that boron can be found in tumor tissue. The compounds prepared can be considered as a new class of boron containing polyamine compounds that may be useful for boron neutron capture therapy of tumors. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Template Syntheses of Copper(II) Complexes from Arylhydrazones of Malononitrile and their Catalytic Activity towards Alcohol Oxidations and the Nitroaldol Reaction: Hydrogen Bond‐Assisted Ligand Liberation and E/Z Isomerisation

A one‐pot template condensation of 2‐(2‐(dicyanomethylene)hydrazinyl)benzenesulfonic acid (H₂L¹, 1 ) or 2‐(2‐(dicyanomethylene)hydrazinyl)benzoic acid (H₂L², 2 ) with methanol (a), ethylenediamine (b), ethanol (c) or water (d) on copper(II), led to a variety of metal complexes, that is, mononuclear [Cu(H₂O)₂(κO¹,κN² L^1a] ( 3 ) and [Cu(H₂O)(κO¹,κN³ L^1b)] ( 4 ), tetranuclear [Cu₄(1 κO¹,κN²:2 κO¹ L^2a)₃‐(1 κO¹, κN²:2 κO² L^2a)] ( 5 ), [Cu₂(H₂O)(1 κO¹, κN²:2 κO¹ L^2c)‐(1 κO¹,1 κN²:2 κO¹,2 κN¹‐ L^2c)]₂ ( 6 ) and [Cu₂(H₂O)₂(κO¹,κN²‐ L^1dd)‐(1 κO¹,κN²:2 κO¹ L^1dd)(μ‐H₂O)]₂ ? 2 H₂O ( 7? 2 H₂O), as well as polymer‐ ic [Cu(H₂O)(κO¹,1 κN²:2 κN¹ L^1c)]_n ( 8 ) and [Cu(NH₂C₂H₅)(κO¹,1 κN²:2 κN¹L^2a)]_n ( 9 ). The ligands 2‐SO₃H‐C₆H₄‐(NH)N?C{(CN)[C(NH₂)‐(?NCH₂CH₂NH₂)]} (H₂L^1b, 10 ), 2‐CO₂H‐C₆H₄‐(NH)N?{C(CN)[C(OCH₃)‐(?NH)]} (H₂L^2a, 11 ) and 2‐SO₃H‐C₆H₄‐(NH)N?C{C(?O)‐(NH₂)}₂ (H₂L^1dd, 12 ) were easily liberated upon respective treatment of 4 , 5 and 7 with HCl, whereas the formation of cyclic zwitterionic amidine 2‐(SO₃^?)? C₆H₄? N?NC(? C?(NH⁺)CH₂CH₂NH)(?CNHCH₂CH₂NH) ( 13 ) was observed when 1 was treated with ethylenediamine. The hydrogen bond‐induced E/Z isomerization of the (HL^1d)^? ligand occurs upon conversion of [{Na(H₂O)₂(μ‐H₂O)₂}(HL^1d)]_n ( 14 ) to [Cu(H₂O)₆][HL^1d]₂ ? 2 H₂O ( 15 ) and [{CuNa(H₂O)‐(κN¹,1 κO²:2 κO¹ L^1d)₂}K_0.5(μ‐O)₂]n ? H₂O ( 16 ). The synthesized complexes 3 – 9 are catalyst precursors for both the selective oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols (to the corresponding carbonyl compounds) and the following diastereoselective nitroaldol (Henry) reaction, with typical yields of 80–99 %.     

Tracking the dissolution–recrystallization structural transformation (DRST) of copper(II) complexes: a combined crystallographic,mass spectrometric and DFT study

Methanol‐ and temperature‐induced dissolution–recrystallization structural transformation (DRST) was observed among two novel Cu^II complexes. This is first time that the combination of X‐ray crystallography, mass spectrometry and density functional theory (DFT) theoretical calculations has been used to describe the fragmentation and recombination of a mononuclear Cu^II complex at 60 °C in methanol to obtain a binuclear copper(II) complex. Combining time‐dependent high‐resolution electrospray mass spectrometry, we propose a possible mechanism for the conversion of bis(8‐methoxyquinoline‐κ²N,O)bis(thiocyanato‐κN)copper(II), [Cu(NCS)₂(C₁₀H₉NO)₂], Cu1 , to di‐μ‐methanolato‐κ⁴O:O‐bis[(8‐methoxyquinoline‐κ²N,O)(thiocyanato‐κN)copper(II)], [Cu₂(CH₃O)₂(NCS)₂(C₁₀H₉NO)₂], Cu2 , viz. [Cu(SCN)₂( L )₂] ( Cu1 ) → [Cu( L )₂] → [Cu( L )]/ L → [Cu₂(CH₃O)₂(NCS)₂( L )₂] ( Cu2 ). We screened the antitumour activities of L (8‐methoxyquinoline), Cu1 and Cu2 and found that the antiproliferative effect of Cu2 on some tumour cells was much greater than that of L and Cu1 .     

Versatile Reactivity of Scorpionate‐Anchored Yttrium?Dialkyl Complexes towards Unsaturated Substrates

A series of unusual chemical‐bond transformations were observed in the reactions of high active yttrium? dialkyl complexes with unsaturated small molecules. The reaction of scorpionate‐anchored yttrium? dibenzyl complex [Tp^Me2Y(CH₂Ph)₂(thf)] ( 1 , Tp^Me2=tri(3,5‐dimethylpyrazolyl)borate) with phenyl isothiocyanate led to C?S bond cleavage to give a cubane‐type yttrium–sulfur cluster, {Tp^Me2Y(μ₃‐S)}₄ ( 2 ), accompanied by the elimination of PhN?C(CH₂Ph)₂. However, compound 1 reacted with phenyl isocyanate to afford a C(sp³)? H activation product, [Tp^Me2Y(thf){μ‐η¹:η³‐OC(CHPh)NPh}{μ‐η³:η²‐OC(CHPh)NPh}YTp^Me2] ( 3 ). Moreover, compound 1 reacted with phenylacetonitrile at room temperature to produce γ‐deprotonation product [(Tp^Me2)₂Y]⁺[Tp^Me2Y(N=C?CHPh)₃]^? ( 6 ), in which the newly formed N?C?CHPh ligands bound to the metal through the terminal nitrogen atoms. When this reaction was carried out in toluene at 120 °C, it gave a tandem γ‐deprotonation/insertion/partial‐Tp^Me2‐degradation product, [(Tp^Me2Y)₂(μ‐Pz)₂{μ‐η¹:η³‐NC(CH₂Ph)CHPh}] ( 7 , Pz=3,5‐dimethylpyrazolyl).     

Formation of lithium,sodium and potassium complexes with 1,3,5‐triamino‐1,3,5‐trideoxy‐cis‐inositol (taci)

Single crystals of (1,3‐diamino‐5‐azaniumyl‐1,3,5‐trideoxy‐cis‐inositol‐κ³O²,O⁴,O⁶)(1,3,5‐triamino‐1,3,5‐trideoxy‐cis‐inositol‐κ³O²,O⁴,O⁶)lithium(I) diiodide dihydrate, [Li(C₆H₁₆N₃O₃)(C₆H₁₅N₃O₃)]I₂·2H₂O or [Li(Htaci)(taci)]I₂·2H₂O (taci is 1,3,5‐triamino‐1,3,5‐trideoxy‐cis‐inositol), (I), bis(1,3,5‐triamino‐1,3,5‐trideoxy‐cis‐inositol‐κ³O²,O⁴,O⁶)sodium(I) iodide, [Na(C₆H₁₅N₃O₃)₂]I or [Na(taci)₂]I, (II), and bis(1,3,5‐triamino‐1,3,5‐trideoxy‐cis‐inositol‐κ³O²,O⁴,O⁶)potassium(I) iodide, [K(C₆H₁₅N₃O₃)₂]I or [K(taci)₂]I, (III), were grown by diffusion of MeOH into aqueous solutions of the complexes. The structures of the Na and K complexes are isotypic. In all three complexes, the taci ligands adopt a chair conformation with axial hydroxy groups, and the metal cations exhibit exclusive O‐atom coordination. The six O atoms of the resulting MO₆ unit define a centrosymmetric trigonal antiprism with approximate D_3d symmetry. The interligand O...O distances increase significantly in the order Li < Na < K. The structure of (I) exhibits a complex three‐dimensional network of R—NH₂—H...NH₂—R, R—O—H...NH₂—R and R—O—H...O(H)—H...NH₂—R hydrogen bonds. The structures of the Na and K complexes consist of a stack of layers, in which each taci ligand is bonded to three neighbours via pairwise O—H...NH₂ interactions between vicinal HO—CH—CH—NH₂ groups.     

Two new transition metal inorganic–organic hybrid borates: [tris(2‐aminoethoxy)trihydroxyhexaborato]cobalt(II) and its nickel(II) analogue

The two isomorphous title compounds, [1,5,9‐tris(2‐aminoethoxy)‐3,7,11‐trihydroxy‐3,7,11‐tribora‐1,5,9‐triborata‐2,4,6,8,10,12‐hexaoxa‐13‐oxoniatricyclo[7.3.1.0^5,13]tridecane]cobalt(II), [Co(C₆H₂₁B₆N₃O₁₃)] or Co{B₆O₇(OH)₃[O(CH₂)₂NH₂]₃}, and the Ni^II analogue, [Ni(C₆H₂₁B₆N₃O₁₃)], each consist of an M^II cation and an inorganic–organic hybrid {B₆O₇(OH)₃[O(CH₂)₂NH₂]₃}²⁻ anion. The M^II cation lies on a crystallographic threefold axis (as does one O atom) and is octahedrally coordinated by three N atoms from the organic component. Three O atoms covalently link the B–O cluster and the organic component. Molecules are connected to one another through N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds, forming a three‐dimensional supramolecular network.     

Die Kristallstruktur von cis‐ und trans‐N‐iso‐Propylamidodimethylindium, [(CH3)2In‐N(H)iC3H7]2

The Crystal Structure of cis‐ and trans‐N‐iso‐Propylamidodimethyl Indium, [(CH₃)₂In‐N(H)ⁱC₃H₇]₂ According to the X‐ray structure determination [(CH₃)₂In‐N(H)ⁱC₃H₇]₂ (prepared from InMe₃ (Me = CH₃) and H₂NⁱPr (ⁱPr = CH(CH₃)₂) crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n with 3 dimeric trans as well as 3 dimeric cis isomers per unit cell. The centrosymmetric form has a planar In₂N₂ core with In—N bonds of 222.1(4) and 222.9(5) pm, respectively, the skeleton of the cis isomer with In—N bonds of 221.4(4) pm is slightly folded (13.7°). Some ¹H, ¹³C NMR, IR, and Raman data are reported.