Stereospecific synthesis and redox properties of ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes bearing a redox-active 1,8-naphthyridine unit

Two stereoisomers of cis-[Ru(bpy)(pynp)(CO)Cl]PF₆ (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, pynp = 2-(2-pyridyl)-1,8-naphthyridine) were selectively prepared. The pyridyl rings of the pynp ligand in [Ru(bpy)(pynp)(CO)Cl]⁺ are situated trans and cis, respectively, to the CO ligand. The corresponding CH₃CN complex ([Ru(bpy)(pynp)(CO)(CH₃CN)]²⁺) was also prepared by replacement reactions of the chlorido ligand in CH₃CN. Using these complexes, ligand-centered redox behavior was studied by electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical techniques. The molecular structures of pynp-containing complexes (two stereoisomers of [Ru(bpy)(pynp)(CO)Cl]PF₆ and [Ru(pynp)₂(CO)Cl]PF₆) were determined by X-ray structure analyses.     

Unexpected effect of catalyst concentration on photochemical CO2 reduction by trans(Cl)–Ru(bpy)(CO)2Cl2: new mechanistic insight into the CO/HCOO– selectivity

Photochemical CO₂ reduction catalysed by trans(Cl)–Ru(bpy)(CO)₂Cl₂ (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) efficiently produces carbon monoxide (CO) and formate (HCOO^–) in N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA)/water containing [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ as a photosensitizer and 1-benzyl-1,4-dihydronicotinamide (BNAH) as an electron donor. We have unexpectedly found catalyst concentration dependence of the product ratio (CO/HCOO^–) in the photochemical CO₂ reduction: the ratio of CO/HCOO^– decreases with increasing catalyst concentration. The result has led us to propose a new mechanism in which HCOO^– is selectively produced by the formation of a Ru(i)–Ru(i) dimer as the catalyst intermediate. This reaction mechanism predicts that the Ru–Ru bond dissociates in the reaction of the dimer with CO₂, and that the insufficient electron supply to the catalyst results in the dominant formation of HCOO^–. The proposed mechanism is supported by the result that the time-course profiles of CO and HCOO^– in the photochemical CO₂ reduction catalysed by [Ru(bpy)(CO)₂Cl]₂ (0.05 mM) are very similar to those of the reduction catalysed by trans(Cl)–Ru(bpy)(CO)₂Cl₂ (0.10 mM), and that HCOO^– formation becomes dominant under low-intensity light. The kinetic analyses based on the proposed mechanism could excellently reproduce the unusual catalyst concentration effect on the product ratio. The catalyst concentration effect observed in the photochemical CO₂ reduction using [Ru(4dmbpy)₃]²⁺ (4dmbpy = 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine) instead of [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ as the photosensitizer is also explained with the kinetic analyses, reflecting the smaller quenching rate constant of excited [Ru(4dmbpy)₃]²⁺ by BNAH than that of excited [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺. We have further synthesized trans(Cl)–Ru(6Mes-bpy)(CO)₂Cl₂ (6Mes-bpy = 6,6′-dimesityl-2,2′-bipyridine), which bears bulky substituents at the 6,6′-positions in the 2,2′-bipyridyl ligand, so that the ruthenium complex cannot form the dimer due to the steric hindrance. We have found that this ruthenium complex selectively produces CO, which strongly supports the catalytic mechanism proposed in this work.     

1-(2′-Pyridylazo)-2-naphtholate complexes of ruthenium: Synthesis,characterization, and DNA binding properties

Reaction of 1-(2′-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol (Hpan) with [Ru(dmso)₄Cl₂] (dmso = dimethylsulfoxide), [Ru(trpy)Cl₃] (trpy = 2,2′,2″-terpyridine), [Ru(bpy)Cl₃] (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) and [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] in refluxing ethanol in the presence of a base (NEt₃) affords, respectively, the [Ru(pan)₂], [Ru(trpy)(pan)]⁺ (isolated as perchlorate salt), [Ru(bpy)(pan)Cl] and [Ru(PPh₃)₂(pan)Cl] complexes. Structures of these four complexes have been determined by X-ray crystallography. In each of these complexes, the pan ligand is coordinated to the metal center as a monoanionic tridentate N,N,O-donor. Reaction of the [Ru(bpy)(pan)Cl] complex with pyridine (py) and 4-picoline (pic) in the presence of silver ion has yielded the [Ru(bpy)(pan)(py)]⁺ and [Ru(bpy)(pan)(pic)]⁺ complexes (isolated as perchlorate salts), respectively. All the complexes are diamagnetic (low-spin d⁶, S = 0) and show characteristic ¹H NMR signals and intense MLCT transitions in the visible region. Cyclic voltammetry on all the complexes shows a Ru(II)–Ru(III) oxidation on the positive side of SCE. Except in the [Ru(pan)₂] complex, a second oxidative response has been observed in the other five complexes. Reductions of the coordinated ligands have also been observed on the negative side of SCE. The [Ru(trpy)(pan)]ClO₄, [Ru(bpy)(pan)(py)]ClO₄ and [Ru(bpy)(pan)(pic)]ClO₄ complexes have been observed to bind to DNA, but they have not been able to cleave super-coiled DNA on UV irradiation.     

Chemistry of Ruthenium Polypyridine Complexes: IX. Nitro-Nitrosyl Equilibrium in cis-[Ru(2,2'-bpy)2(L)NO2]+ Complexes

Ruthenium(II) bisbipyridyl complexes cis-[Ru(bpy)₂(L)NO₂](BF₄) (bpy is 2,2'-bipyridyl) with 4-substituted pyridine ligands L = 4-(Y)py (Y = NH₂, Me, Ph, and CN) were obtained. The equilibrium constants of the reversible nitro-nitrosyl transition [Ru(bpy)₂(L)NO₂]⁺ + 2H⁺ [Ru(bpy)₂(L)NO]^{3 +} + H₂O were measured in solutions with pH 1.5-8.5 (ionic strength 0.4). The constants correlate with the protonation constants of free ligands 4-(Y)py.     

Chemistry of ruthenium in N2P2X2 (X = Cl, Br) coordination sphere: Synthesis, characterization and reactivities

Reaction of 2-(phenylazo)pyridine (pap) with [Ru(PPh₃)₃X₂] (X = Cl, Br) in dichloromethane solution affords [Ru(PPh₃)₂(pap)X₂]. These diamagnetic complexes exhibit a weakdd transition and two intense MLCT transitions in the visible region. In dichloromethane solution they display a one-electron reduction of pap near − 0.90 V vs SCE and a reversible ruthenium(II)-ruthenium(III) oxidation near 0.70 V vs SCE. The [Ru^III(PPh₃)₂(pap)Cl₂]⁺ complex cation, generated by coulometric oxidation of [Ru(PPh₃)₂(pap)Cl₂], shows two intense LMCT transitions in the visible region. It oxidizes N,N-dimethylaniline and [Ru^II(bpy)₂Cl₂] (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) to produce N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylbenzidine and [Ru^III(bpy)₂Cl₂]⁺ respectively. Reaction of [Ru(PPh₃)₂(pap)X₂] with Ag⁺ in ethanol produces [Ru(PPh₃)₂(pap)(EtOH)₂]²⁺ which upon further reaction with L (L = pap, bpy, acetylacetonate ion(acac⁻) and oxalate ion (ox²⁻)) gives complexes of type [Ru(PPh₃)₂(pap)(L)]ⁿ⁺ (n = 0, 1, 2). All these diamagnetic complexes show a weakdd transition and several intense MLCT transitions in the visible region. The ruthenium(II)-ruthenium(III) oxidation potential decreases in the order (of L): pap > bpy > acac⁻ > ox²⁻. Reductions of the coordinated pap and bpy are also observed.     

Electropolymerization of [Ru(bpy)(CO)2Cl2] (bpy=2,2′-bipyridine: a revisited trans versus cis(Cl) isomeric influence study

The mono-bipyridine bis carbonyl complex [Ru(bpy)(CO)₂Cl₂] exists in two stereoisomeric forms having a trans(Cl)/cis(CO) (1) and cis(Cl)/cis(CO) (2) configuration. In previous work we reported that only the trans(Cl)/cis(CO) isomer 1 leads by a two-electron reduction to the formation of [Ru(bpy)(CO)₂]_n polymeric film on an electrode surface. This initial statement was overstated, as both isomers allowed the build up of polymers. A detailed comparison of the electropolymerization of both isomers is reported here, as well as the reduction into dimers of parent stereoisomer [Ru(bpy)(CO)₂(C(O)OMe)Cl] complexes 3 and 4 obtained as side products during the synthesis of 1 and 2.     

Synthesis,Characterization, Electrochemical and Spectroscopic Properties of [Ru(dppt)(bpy)Cl]+ and [Ru(pta)(bpy)Cl]+

Two novel Ru^II complexes [Ru(dppt)(bpy)Cl]ClO₄ (1) and [Ru(pta)(bpy)Cl]ClO₄ (2)[dppt, pta and bpy = 3-(1,10-phenanthrolin-2-yl)-5,6-diphenyl-as-triazine, 3-(1,10-phenanthrolin-2-yl)-as-triazino[5,6-f]acenaphthylene and 2,2-bipyridine, respectively] were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis and electrospray mass spectrometry, ¹H-n.m.r., and u.v.–vis spectroscopy. The redox properties of the complexes were examined using cyclic voltammetry. Due to the strong -accepting character of asymmetric ligands, the MLCT bands of (1) and (2) are shifted significantly to lower energies by comparison with [Ru(tpy)(bpy)Cl]⁺.     

Cooperative B–H bond activation: dual site borane activation by redox active κ2-N,S-chelated complexes

Cooperative dual site activation of boranes by redox-active 1,3-N,S-chelated ruthenium species, mer-[PR₃{κ²-N,S-(L)}₂Ru{κ¹-S-(L)}], (mer-2a: R = Cy, mer-2b: R = Ph; L = NC₇H₄S₂), generated from the aerial oxidation of borate complexes, [PR₃{κ²-N,S-(L)}Ru{κ³-H,S,S′-BH₂(L)₂}] (trans–mer-1a: R = Cy, trans–mer-1b: R = Ph; L = NC₇H₄S₂), has been investigated. Utilizing the rich electronic behaviour of these 1,3-N,S-chelated ruthenium species, we have established that a combination of redox-active ligands and metal–ligand cooperativity has a big influence on the multisite borane activation. For example, treatment of mer-2a–b with BH₃·THF led to the isolation of fac-[PR₃Ru{κ³-H,S,S′-(NH₂BSBH₂N)(S₂C₇H₄)₂}] (fac-3a: R = Cy and fac-3b: R = Ph) that captured boranes at both sites of the κ²-N,S-chelated ruthenacycles. The core structure of fac-3a and fac-3b consists of two five-membered ruthenacycles [RuBNCS] which are fused by one butterfly moiety [RuB₂S]. Analogous fac-3c, [PPh₃Ru{κ³-H,S,S′-(NH₂BSBH₂N)(SC₅H₄)₂}], can also be synthesized from the reaction of BH₃·THF with [PPh₃{κ²-N,S-(SNC₅H₄)}{κ³-H,S,S′-BH₂(SNH₄C₅)₂}Ru], cis–fac-1c. In stark contrast, when mer-2b was treated with BH₂Mes (Mes = 2,4,6-trimethyl phenyl) it led to the formation of trans- and cis-bis(dihydroborate) complexes [{κ³-S,H,H-(NH₂BMes)Ru(S₂C₇H₄)}₂], (trans-4 and cis-4). Both the complexes have two five-membered [Ru–(H)₂–B–NCS] ruthenacycles with κ²-H–H coordination modes. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations suggest that the activation of boranes across the dual Ru–N site is more facile than the Ru–S one.

Redox-active ruthenium complexes supported by hemilabile κ²-N,S-chelated ruthenacycles undergo unusual dual site B–H bond activation through metal–ligand cooperation with free and bulky boranes.     

Synthesis,characterization and anticancer activity of 3-aminopyrazine-2-carboxylic acid transition metal complexes

Synthetic procedures are described that allow access to the new complexes cis-[Mo₂O₅(apc)₂], cis-[WO₂(apc)₂], trans-[UO₂(apc)₂], [Ru(apc)₂(H₂O)₂], [Ru(PPh₃)₂(apc)₂], [Rh(apc)₃], [Rh(PPh₃)₂(apc)₂]ClO₄, [M(apc)₂], [M(PPh₃)₂(apc)]Cl, [M(bpy)(apc)]Cl (M(II) = Pd, Pt), [Pd(bpy)(apc)Cl], [Ag(apc)(H₂O)₂] and [Ir(bpy)(Hapc)₂]Cl₃, where Hapc, is 3-aminopyrazine-2-carboxylic acid. These complexes were characterized by physico-chemical and spectroscopic techniques. Both Hapc and several of its complexes display significant anticancer activity against Ehrlich ascites tumour cells (EAC) in albino mice.     

Electrochemical Properties of a Rhodium(III) Mono-Terpyridyl Complex and Use as a Catalyst for Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution in Water

Molecular hydrogen (H₂) is considered one of the most promising fuels to decarbonize the industrial and transportation sectors, and its photocatalytic production from molecular catalysts is a research field that is still abounding. The search for new molecular catalysts for H₂ production with simple and easily synthesized ligands is still ongoing, and the terpyridine ligand with its particular electronic and coordination properties, is a good candidate to design new catalysts meeting these requirements. Herein, we have isolated the new mono-terpyridyl rhodium complex, [Rh^III(tpy)(CH₃CN)Cl₂](CF₃SO₃) (Rh-tpy), and shown that it can act as a catalyst for the light-induced proton reduction into H₂ in water in the presence of the [Ru(bpy)₃]Cl₂ (Ru) photosensitizer and ascorbate as sacrificial electron donor. Under photocatalytic conditions, in acetate buffer at pH 4.5 with 0.1 M of ascorbate and 530 μM of Ru, the Rh-tpy catalyst produces H₂ with turnover number versus catalyst (TON_Cat*) of 300 at a Rh concentration of 10 μM, and up to 1000 at a concentration of 1 μM. The photocatalytic performance of Ru/Rh-tpy/HA^–/H₂A has been also compared with that obtained with the bis-dimethyl-bipyridyl complex [Rh^III(dmbpy)₂Cl₂]⁺ (Rh2) as a catalyst in the same experimental conditions. The investigation of the electrochemical properties of Rh-tpy in DMF solvent reveals that the two-electrons reduced state of the complex, the square-planar [Rh^I(tpy)Cl] (Rh^I-tpy), is quantitatively electrogenerated by bulk electrolysis. This complex is stable for hours under an inert atmosphere owing to the π-acceptor property of the terpyridine ligand that stabilizes the low oxidation states of the rhodium, making this catalyst less prone to degrade during photocatalysis. The π-acceptor property of terpyridine also confers to the Rh-tpy catalyst a moderately negative reduction potential (Ep_c(Rh^III/Rh^I) = −0.83 V vs. SCE in DMF), making possible its reduction by the reduced state of Ru, [Ru^II(bpy)(bpy^•−)]⁺ (Ru⁻) (E_1/2(Ru^II/Ru⁻) = −1.50 V vs. SCE) generated by a reductive quenching of the Ru excited state (*Ru) by ascorbate during photocatalysis. A Stern–Volmer plot and transient absorption spectroscopy confirmed that the first step of the photocatalytic process is the reductive quenching of *Ru by ascorbate. The resulting reduced Ru species (Ru⁻) were then able to activate the Rh^III-tpy H₂-evolving catalyst by reduction generating Rh^I-tpy, which can react with a proton on a sub-nanosecond time scale to form a Rh^III(H)-tpy hydride, the key intermediate for H₂ evolution.     

Regulation of electron donating ability to metal center: isolation and characterization of ruthenium carbonyl complexes with N,N- and/or N,O-donor polypyridyl ligands

Polypyridyl ruthenium(II) dicarbonyl complexes with an N,O- and/or N,N-donor ligand, [Ru(pic)(CO)₂Cl₂]⁻ (1), [Ru(bpy)(pic)(CO)₂]⁺ (2), [Ru(pic)₂(CO)₂] (3), and [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)₂]²⁺ (4) (pic=2-pyridylcarboxylato, bpy=2,2′-bipyridine) were prepared for comparison of the electron donor ability of these ligands to the ruthenium center. A carbonyl group of [Ru(L1)(L2)(CO)₂]ⁿ (L1, L2=bpy, pic) successively reacted with one and two equivalents of OH⁻ to form [Ru(L1)(L2)(CO)(C(O)OH)]ⁿ⁻¹ and [Ru(L1)(L2)(CO)(CO₂)]ⁿ⁻². These three complexes exist as equilbrium mixtures in aqueous solutions and the equilibrium constants were determined potentiometrically. Electrochemical reduction of 2 in CO₂-saturated CH₃CN–H₂O at −1.5 V selectively produced CO.     

Synthesis, characterization and photophysics of alkyne bridged bimetallic rhenium(I) and ruthenium(II) complexes

Six new homobimetallic and heterobimetallic complexes of rhenium(I) and ruthenium(II) bridged by ethynylene spacer [(CO)₃(bpy)Re(BL)Re(bpy)(CO)₃]²⁺ [Cl(bpy)₂Ru(BL)Ru(bpy)₂Cl]²⁺ and [(CO)₃(bpy)Re(BL)Ru(bpy)₂Cl]²⁺ (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, BL = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)acetylene (bpa) and 1,4-bis(4-pyridyl)butadiyne (bpb) are synthesized and characterized. The electrochemical and photophysical properties of all the complexes show a weak interaction between two metal centers in heterobimetallic complexes. The excited state lifetime of the complexes is increased upon introduction of ethynylene spacer and the transient spectra show that this is due to delocalization of electron in the bridging ligand. Also, intramolecular energy transfer from *Re(I) to Ru(II) in Re–Ru heterobimetallic complexes occurs with a rate constant 4 × 10⁷ s⁻¹.     

Mixed ligand complexes with 2-piperidine-carboxylic acid as primary ligand and ethylene diamine, 2,2′-bipyridyl, 1,10-phenanthroline and 2(2′-pyridyl)quinoxaline as secondary ligands: preparation,characterization and biological activity

Synthesis procedures are described for the new stable mixed ligand complexes, [Pd(Hpa)(pa)]Cl, [Pd(pa)(H₂O)₂]Cl, [Pd(pa)(en)]Cl, [Pd(pa)(bpy)]Cl, [Pd(pa)(phen)Cl], [Pd(pa)(pyq)Cl], cis-[MoO₂(pa)₂], [Ag(pa)(bpy)], [Ag(pa)(pyq)], trans-[UO₂(pa)(pyq)](BPh₄) and [ReO(PPh₃)(pa)₂]Cl (Hpa = 2-piperidine-carboxylic acid, en = ethylene diamine, bpy = 2,2′-bipyridyl, phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, pyq = 2(2′-pyridyl)quinoxaline). Their elemental analyses, conductance, thermal measurements, Raman, IR, electronic, ¹H-n.m.r. and mass spectra have been measured and discussed. 2-Piperidine-carboxylic acid and its palladium complexes have been tested as growth inhibitors against Ehrlich ascites tumour cells (EAC) in Swiss albino mice.     

The synthesis of thionitrosodimethylamine (Me2NNS) complexes of ruthenium,osmium, and iridium

Neutral hydrido complexes [ML]ClH(PPh₃)₃ ([ML] = Ru(CO), Os(CO) and Ir(Cl)] react with thionitrosodimethylamine, Me₂NNS, to give [ML]ClH-(SNNMe₂)(PPh₃)₂ with H trans to Me₂NNS, while the hydrido cations cis,trans-[[ML]H(SNNMe₂)₂(PPh₃)₂]⁺ are obtained from Me₂NNS and [Ru(NCMe)₂(CO)-(PPh₃)₂]⁺, [OsH(OH₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₃]⁺ and [IrClH(NCMe)₂(PPh₃)₂]⁺, respectively. The coordinatively unsaturated aryl complexes [ML′]Cl(p-tolyl)(PPh₃)₂ ([ML′]Ru(CO), Os(CO) and Os(CS)) coordinate one molecule of Me₂NNS to give [ML′]Cl(p-tolyl)(SNNMe₂)(PPh₃)₂, the chloride ligands of which are labile. Spectroscopic data suggest that in all these complexes the Me₂NNS ligand adopts a η¹(S) coordination mode.     

Synthesis, characterization and electron transfer properties of some picolinate complexes of ruthenium

In aqueous solution ruthenium trichloride reacted with picolinic acid (Hpic) in the presence of a base to afford [Ru(pic)₃]. In solution it shows intense ligand-to-metal charge transfer transitions near 310 and 370 nm, together with a low-intensity absorption near 2000 nm. [Ru(pic)₃] is one-electron paramagnetic and shows a rhombic ESR spectrum in 1:1 dimethylsulphoxide-methanol solution at 77 K. The distortions from octahedral symmetry have been calculated by ESR data analysis. The axial distortion is larger than the rhombic one. In acetonitrile solution it shows a reversible ruthenium(III)-ruthenium(II) reduction at −0.09 V vs. SCE and a reversible ruthenium(III)-ruthenium(IV) oxidation at 1.52 V vs. SCE. Chemical or electrochemical reduction of [Ru^III(pic)₃] gives [Ru^II(pic)₃]⁻, which in solution shows intense MLCT transitions near 360, 410 and 490 nm, and is converted back to [Ru(pic)₃] by exposure to air. Reaction of [Ru(pic)₃] with 8-quinolinol (HQ) in dimethylsulphoxide solution affords [RuQ₃]. [Ru(bpy)(pic)₂] (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) has been prepared by the reaction of Hpic with [Ru(bpy)(acac)₂]Cl (acac = acetylacetonate ion) in ethyleneglycol. It is diamagnetic and in solution shows intense MLCT transitions near 370, 410 and 530 nm. In acetonitrile solution it shows a reversible ruthenium(II)-ruthernium(III) oxidation at 0.44 V vs. SCE and a reversible one-electron reduction of bpy at − 1.64V vs. SCE.     

Preparation and photochemistry of macromolecular bound ruthenium(II) complexes in aqueous solutions

Ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes with macromolecular ligands poly(methylolacrylamide-co-vinylpyridine) and poly (acrylamide-co-vinylpyridine) have been synthesized. The macromolecular ruthenium (II) complexes which are soluble in water have been characterized and their absorption and emission properties have been studied in aqueous solution. Photolysis of the complex in aqueous solution leads to photoaquation reactions with release of coordinated pyridines of the polymer. In the case of monomeric complex, cis-[Ru(bpy)₂(py)₂]Cl₂, photolysis in water in presence of Cl^? ions produces only the substitution of the pyridine by water whereas in the polymeric complexes, [Ru(bpy)₂(MAAM-co-VP)₂]Cl₂ photolysis in the presence of chloride produces [Ru(bpy)₂(MAAM-co-VP)Cl]Cl and [Ru(bpy)₂(AM-co-VP)Cl]Cl, respectively. Quantum yields for the photosubstitution reactions have been determined and mechanistic details are outlined.     

Electrochemistry of a novel monoruthenated porphyrin and its interaction with DNA

Interactions of an anisomerous ruthenated porphyrin [Ru(MPyTPP)(bpy)₂Cl]⁺ (where bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, MPyTPP = 5-pyridyl-10,15,20-triphenyl porphyrin) with calf thymus DNA are studied using a tin-doped indium oxide (ITO) electrode. The Ru^III/II redox reaction for the complex exhibits a surface-controlled electron transfer process in buffer solutions. There exists an obvious interaction of the adsorbed [Ru(MPyTPP)(bpy)₂Cl]⁺ on an ITO electrode with DNA in the buffer solutions. The formal potential for [Ru(MPyTPP)(bpy)₂Cl]^2+/+ redox reaction is found to shift negatively in the presence of DNA compared with that in the absence of DNA. However, the current signals of [Ru(bpy)₃]^3+/2+ reaction exhibits a distinct catalytic enhancement to DNA, in contrast to the interactions of [Ru(MPyTPP)(bpy)₂Cl]⁺with DNA.     

Reactions of trans-[RuCl2(CO)2(PEt3)2] with 1,1-dithiolates: Stepwise formation of cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt3)(S2X)] (X = CNMe2, CNEt2, COEt,P(OEt)2, PPh2)

Trans-[RuCl₂(CO)₂(PEt₃)₂] reacts with two equivalents of a series of 1,1-dithiolate ligands to form the bis(dithiolate) complexes, cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt₃)(S₂X)₂] (X = CNMe₂, CNEt₂, COEt, P(OEt)₂, PPh₂). Two intermediates have been isolated; trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂Cl(CO){S₂P(OEt)₂}] and trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂(CO)(η¹-S₂COEt)(η²-S₂COEt)], allowing a simple reaction scheme to be postulated involving three steps; (i) initial replacement of cis carbonyl and chloride ligands, (ii) substitution of the second chloride, (iii) loss of a phosphine. Thermolysis of cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt₃)(S₂CNMe₂)₂] with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ in xylene affords trinuclear [Ru₃(μ₃-S)₂(PEt₃)(CO)₈] as a result of dithiocarbamate degradation. Crystal structures of cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt₃)(S₂X)₂] (X = NMe₂, COEt), trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂Cl(CO){S₂P(OEt)₂}], trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂(CO)(η¹-S₂COEt)(η²-S₂COEt)] and [Ru₃(μ₃-S)₂(PEt₃)(CO)₈] are reported.     

Metal‐catalyzed reversible conversion between chemical and electrical energy designed towards a sustainable society

Proton dissociation of an aqua‐Ru‐quinone complex, [Ru(trpy)(q)(OH₂)]²⁺ (trpy = 2,2′ : 6′,2″‐terpyridine, q = 3,5‐di‐t‐butylquinone) proceeded in two steps (pK_a = 5.5 and ca. 10.5). The first step simply produced [Ru(trpy)(q)(OH)]⁺, while the second one gave an unusual oxyl radical complex, [Ru(trpy)(sq)(O^?.)]⁰ (sq = 3,5‐di‐t‐butylsemiquinone), owing to an intramolecular electron transfer from the resultant O^2? to q. A dinuclear Ru complex bridged by an anthracene framework, [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂]²⁺ (btpyan = 1,8‐bis(2,2′‐terpyridyl)anthracene), was prepared to place two Ru(trpy)(q)(OH) groups at a close distance. Deprotonation of the two hydroxy protons of [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂]²⁺ generated two oxyl radical Ru‐O^?. groups, which worked as a precursor for O₂ evolution in the oxidation of water. The [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂](SbF₆)₂ modified ITO electrode effectively catalyzed four‐electron oxidation of water to evolve O₂ (TON = 33500) under electrolysis at +1.70 V in H₂O (pH 4.0). Various physical measurements and DFT calculations indicated that a radical coupling between two Ru(sq)(O^?.) groups forms a (cat)Ru‐O‐O‐Ru(sq) (cat = 3,5‐di‐t‐butylcathechol) framework with a μ‐superoxo bond. Successive removal of four electrons from the cat, sq, and superoxo groups of [Ru₂(btpyan)(cat)(sq)(μ‐O₂^?)]⁰ assisted with an attack of two water (or OH^?) to Ru centers, which causes smooth O₂ evolution with regeneration of [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂]²⁺. Deprotonation of an Ru‐quinone‐ammonia complex also gave the corresponding Ru‐semiquinone‐aminyl radical. The oxidized form of the latter showed a high catalytic activity towards the oxidation of methanol in the presence of base. Three complexes, [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)₂]²⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(C(O)OH)]⁺, and [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(CO₂)]⁰ exist as an equilibrium mixture in water. Treatment of [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)₂]²⁺ with BH₄^? gave [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(C(O)H)]⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(CH₂OH)]⁺, and [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(OH₂)]²⁺ with generation of CH₃OH in aqueous conditions. Based on these results, a reasonable catalytic pathway from CO₂ to CH₃OH in electro‐ and photochemical CO₂ reduction is proposed. A new pbn (pbn = 2‐pyridylbenzo[b]‐1,5‐naphthyridine) ligand was designed as a renewable hydride donor for the six‐electron reduction of CO₂. A series of [Ru(bpy)_3‐n(pbn)_n]²⁺ (n = 1, 2, 3) complexes undergoes photochemical two‐ (n = 1), four‐ (n = 2), and six‐electron reductions (n = 3) under irradiation of visible light in the presence of N(CH₂CH₂OH)₃. © 2009 The Japan Chemical Journal Forum and Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Chem Rec 9: 169–186; 2009: Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ) DOI 10.1002/tcr.200800039