On practical metrology and chemical analysis: etalons and traceability systems

 National measurement systems are infrastructures to ensure, for each nation, a consistent and internationally recognised basis for measurement. Such complex systems have historical, technical, legal, organisational and institutional aspects to connect scientific metrology with practical measurements. Underlying any valid measurement is a chain of comparisons linking the measurement to an accepted standard. The ways the links are forged and the etalons (measurement standards) to which they connect are defining characteristics of all measurement systems. This is often referred to as traceability which aims at basing measurements in common measurement units – a key issue for the integration of quantitative chemical analysis with the evolving physical and engineering measurement systems. Adequate traceability and metrological control make possible new technical capabilities and new levels of quality assurance and confidence by users in the accuracy and integrity of quantitative analytical results. Traceability for chemical measurements is difficult to achieve and harder to demonstrate. The supply of appropriate etalons is critical to the development of metrology systems for chemical analysis. An approach is suggested that involves the development of networks of specialised reference laboratories able to make matrix-independent reference measurements on submitted samples, which may then be used as reference materials by an originating laboratory using its practical measurement procedures. Received: 31 July 1995 Accepted: 19 August 1995     

Metrological value of participating in interlaboratory comparisons

Quality of chemical measurement is a central issue nowadays with social, political and economic implications. This paper aims to describe how interlaboratory comparisons (ILCs) can contribute towards better quality of chemical measurements. The importance of ILCs as well as the different types and the requirements for proper organization of ILCs are explained. The international structure and organization of metrology is given, highlighting the activities related to chemical measurements. Particularly the use of ILCs in the service of metrology in chemistry is highlighted. A very important discussion concerning ILCs is how they can (or cannot) establish traceability. The view of the authors is that traceability cannot, as such, be established through ILCs. On the other hand, participation in ILCs can clearly support the claims for quality measurements, as ILCs are experimental and objective demonstrations of measurement capability.     

CCQM primary methods symposium: how far does the light shine?

The Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM) has the task of organizing a comprehensive set of international comparisons to establish the technical basis for the mutual recognition of measurement capabilities among the national measurement institutes (NMIs) in the field of chemical measurement. The challenge that the CCQM faces is to identify, design, and conduct a limited number of key comparisons to enable the assessment of measurement comparability among NMIs across the entirety of ’chemical measurement space’. This is no easy task because the field of chemical metrology is extremely diverse and multidimensional, owing to the number of measurand types, concentrations, and matrix types of importance. The ”CCQM primary methods symposium: how far does the light shine?” was organized to provide information and initiate discussions to assist in this challenge, and clarify how the concept of a primary method of measurement could be instrumental in achieving this goal.     

Human being as a part of measuring system influencing measurement results

The role of human being as a part of a measuring system in a chemical analytical laboratory is discussed. It is argued that a measuring system in chemical analysis includes not only measuring instruments and other devices, reagents and supplies, but also a sampling inspector and/or analyst performing a number of important operations. Without this human contribution, a measurement cannot be carried out. Human errors, therefore, influence the measurement result, i.e., the measurand estimate and the associated uncertainty. Consequently, chemical analytical and metrological communities should devote more attention to the topic of human errors, in particular at the design and development of a chemical analytical/test method and measurement procedure. Also, mapping human errors ought to be included in the program of validation of the measurement procedure (method). Teaching specialists in analytical chemistry and students how to reduce human errors in a chemical analytical laboratory and how to take into account the error residual risk, is important. Human errors and their metrological implications are suggested for consideration in future editions of the relevant documents, such as the International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM) and the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM).     

Quality and the development of reference materials, including the role of traceability and comparability

The global recognition that quality is an economic issue is requiring analytical chemists to look at the chemical measurement process in a way that has not been done before. Much work has been done in certifying reference materials, writing measurement protocols, creating measurement networks, developing analytical measurement techniques and other efforts to make good measurements. This article explores the meaning of quality in chemical measurements and discusses quality in terms of credibility, reliability, traceability and comparability. The importance of understanding the contribution of comparability and traceability to quality in chemical measurements and chemical metrology is emphasized.     

"Demonstration" vs. "designation" of measurement competence: the need to link accreditation to metrology

Formal acceptance of the results of chemical laboratories is increasingly organized through a) accreditation of measuring laboratories nationally and b) mutual recognition of accreditation internationally (through formal Multilateral Recognition Agreements, MRAs). However, real comparability of results of measurements is realized by using common (internationally agreed) measurement scales which make these results traceable to this scale, i.e. "traceable" to the same (internationally agreed) value of the unit of that scale. In addition, the criterion against which the evaluation is done, should be "external" to the measurement laboratories which are being evaluated. This is realized in IRMM's International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) where evaluation is performed against values which are anchored using "metrology", the science of measurement with its own rules, which offers a sound foundation for measurement in all scientific disciplines. It is argued in this paper that the demonstration of measurement capability against values on such scales provides a result-oriented rather than a procedure-oriented evaluation. Thus, competence can be "demonstrated" rather than just "designated" and this can be shown to both customers and regulators. It inspires more confidence.     

“Demonstration” vs. “designation” of measurement competence: the need to link accreditation to metrology

Formal acceptance of the results of chemical laboratories is increasingly organized through a) accreditation of measuring laboratories nationally and b) mutual recognition of accreditation internationally (through formal Multilateral Recognition Agreements, MRAs). However, real comparability of results of measurements is realized by using common (internationally agreed) measurement scales which make these results traceable to this scale, i.e. “traceable” to the same (internationally agreed) value of the unit of that scale. In addition, the criterion against which the evaluation is done, should be “external” to the measurement laboratories which are being evaluated. This is realized in IRMM’s International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) where evaluation is performed against values which are anchored using “metrology”, the science of measurement with its own rules, which offers a sound foundation for measurement in all scientific disciplines. It is argued in this paper that the demonstration of measurement capability against values on such scales provides a result-oriented rather than a procedure-oriented evaluation. Thus, competence can be “demonstrated” rather than just “designated” and this can be shown to both customers and regulators. It inspires more confidence.     

The practical realization of the traceability of chemical measurements standards

Metrology is based on the concept of traceability. Traceability provides a means of relating measurement results to common standards thereby helping to ensure that measurements made in different laboratories are comparable. Good progress has been made in the application of metrological principles to chemical measurement, but there remains confusion about how you actually achieve traceability in a practical way. This paper elaborates on the meaning and application of much used phrases such as 'the value of a standard', 'stated references', 'unbroken chain of comparisons', and 'stated uncertainties'. It also explains how traceability can be established in a practical way for different types of stated references, namely pure substance reference materials, matrix reference materials, and primary and reference methods. Finally, traceability chains for some typical examples of chemical measurement are described.     

化学计量体系的特点及实现有效化学测量的途径

叙述了有效化学测量的意义、化学计量体系的组成和特点,介绍了实现有效化学测量的途径以及标准物质在化学测量中的作用。     

The use of certified reference materials in the Romanian traceability scheme

 For ensuring the traceability and uniformity of measurement results, the main objectives of national metrology programmes in chemistry are to calibrate and verify measuring instruments, to evaluate the uncertainty of measurement results and to intercompare the analytical results, etc. The concept of traceability has developed recently in chemical measurements, thus, an attempt to implement the principles of metrological traceability especially by appropriateness calibration using composition certified reference materials (CRMs) is underlined. Interlaboratory comparisons are also a useful response to the need for comparable results. The paper presents some aspects and practices in the field of spectrometric measurement regarding the metrological quality of the traceability by calibrating the instruments using suitable and reliable CRMs. The uncertainty of results, as a measure of the reliability that can be placed on them, has been adequately described in different documents and, as a consequence, some examples of evaluating the measurement uncertainty are described. The relationship between uncertainty and traceability, as two fundamental concepts of metrology which are intimately linked, is underlined. Received: 12 November 1999 / Accepted: 10 December 1999     

On the existence of primary methods of measurement

 There is much discussion in chemical metrology about the definition of primary methods of measurement, just as a couple of years ago there was debate about its predecessors, absolute methods and definitive methods. It is argued in this paper that the designation of certain methods as being primary only makes sense if there is an outstanding property identified that is common to all primary methods, and not present for all non-primary methods. The aim to identify primary methods should not blur our notion that it is the good practice of analytical chemistry that produces good results, not a particular method of analysis.     

The practical realization of the traceability of chemical measurements standards

 Metrology is based on the concept of traceability. Traceability provides a means of relating measurement results to common standards thereby helping to ensure that measurements made in different laboratories are comparable. Good progress has been made in the application of metrological principles to chemical measurement, but there remains confusion about how you actually achieve traceability in a practical way.

This paper elaborates on the meaning and application of much used phrases such as 'the value of a standard', 'stated references', 'unbroken chain of comparisons', and 'stated uncertainties'. It also explains how traceability can be established in a practical way for different types of stated references, namely pure substance reference materials, matrix reference materials, and primary and reference methods. Finally, traceability chains for some typical examples of chemical measurement are described.

     

How to achieve international comparability for chemical measurements

 It is the central aim of the current activities of metrology in chemistry to build confidence in the reliability of chemical measurement results so that they are accepted without costly duplication being necessary. An important prerequisite for such confidence is comparability based on traceability to recognised common references, ideally the SI units. Since metrology is organised within a national framework according to the national laws and regulations, a two-step procedure is to be followed to achieve international comparability for chemical measurements which is increasingly required as a result of the globalization of trade and economy: (1) establishment of national traceability structures for chemical measurements and (2) mutual recognition of the national traceability structures on the basis of equivalence criteria. The first step is at present being taken in many countries. Examples are presented for Germany. The second step has been initiated by the Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) of the Meter Convention for national measurement standards and measurements and calibrations provided by national metrology institutes, which is based on international comparison measurements (key comparisons) carried out on the national standards level. Chemical analysis is included in this process through the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM).

     

How to achieve international comparability for chemical measurements

It is the central aim of the current activities of metrology in chemistry to build confidence in the reliability of chemical measurement results so that they are accepted without costly duplication being necessary. An important prerequisite for such confidence is comparability based on traceability to recognised common references, ideally the SI units. Since metrology is organised within a national framework according to the national laws and regulations, a two-step procedure is to be followed to achieve international comparability for chemical measurements which is increasingly required as a result of the globalization of trade and economy: (1) establishment of national traceability structures for chemical measurements and (2) mutual recognition of the national traceability structures on the basis of equivalence criteria. The first step is at present being taken in many countries. Examples are presented for Germany. The second step has been initiated by the Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) of the Meter Convention for national measurement standards and measurements and calibrations provided by national metrology institutes, which is based on international comparison measurements (key comparisons) carried out on the national standards level. Chemical analysis is included in this process through the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM).     

A strategy for a national metrology institute to create a cost effective distributed metrology infrastructure for chemical measurements

A sound strategy for a national metrology institute (NMI) is proposed, describing how to set up an metrology infrastructure for chemical measurements. A national measurement infrastructure is defined as a collection of various measurement services (testing, calibration and reference laboratories) and the communication between these services. For clarity, in this paper the distributed metrology infrastructure covers those organisations that are involved in disseminating measurement traceability (i.e. the national metrology institute and the reference laboratories acting as national reference standard holders).The strategy aims at a proper support of sectoral field laboratories. It is based on a distributed metrology system. Such a system is composed of clearly identified national reference standard holders for particular measurement services (e.g. for a particular analyte in a particular matrix) co-ordinated via an NMI. Such national reference standard holders, appointed by the NMI, represent the best measurement capability inside the country, and their appointment is based on demonstrated measurement competence. They receive support (e.g. under contract) from the NMI to fulfil this role. They have the obligation to demonstrate their measurement capabilities on a regular basis and in a publicly open and transparent way.In particular and carefully selected cases, the NMI itself can and should act as national reference standard holder. The NMI should particularly devote a large part of its resources to cross-sectoral knowledge transfer, to advice and co-ordination. This can be achieved by participating in teaching/training, by supporting the accreditation, by being involved in advising governmental bodies in authorisation of laboratories and by assisting in the implementation of legislation.As a consequence, only when values produced at the NMI (or one of its designated national reference standard holders) are disseminated to field laboratories (e.g. for CRMs or as a calibration service) will it be necessary to have the NMI measurement capability recognised under the CIPM-MRA system.Such a distributed system requires an efficient communication tool between the three stakeholders concerned: the NMI, the national reference standard holder and the end users. The latter not only include the field laboratories, but also governmental bodies and the national accreditation body.Presented at the XVIIIth IMEKO Congress in Dubrovnik-Cavtat, June 22–27, 2003Further contributors to this paper: M. Buzoianu (National Institute of Metrology, Bucharest), W.Kozlowski (Central Office of Measures, Warsaw), P. Klenovsky, Frantisek Jelinek (CMI, Prague), C. Michael (State General Laboratory, Nicosia), Zsofia Nagyné Szilágyi, (National Office of Measures, Budapest), V. Patoprsty (Slovak Institute of Metrology, Bratislava), A. Todorova (SAMTS Sofia)     

A national traceability system for chemical measurements

Current developments in Germany for establishing a traceability system for chemical measurements are reported. The focus is on a dissemination mechanism which employs chemical calibration laboratories accredited within the framework of the German Calibration Service (DKD) and acting as "multipliers" between the national standards level and the user level by providing the user with calibration means which are traceable to the SI via national standards. At the national standards level, a network of high-level chemistry institutes coordinated by the national metrology institute, PTB, provides the primary references for chemical measurements.The use of the metrological dissemination system provided by the DKD also for chemical measurements is a logical extension of a traceability mechanism, successful for more than two decades in general metrology, to metrology in chemistry. In detail, traceability structures in clinical chemistry, electrochemistry, elemental analysis and gas analysis are described. This system has become an important part of the efforts made in Germany to support chemical laboratories in meeting the traceability requirements of the market and of legal regulations.     

21世纪化学计量事业展望

科学技术的迅猛发展,使化学计量已成为高度的数字化测量和高可信度测量的结合,化学计量对人身安全与健康、环境保护、农业发展、产品质量以及国家经济贸易的影响越来越大。因此,拓宽研究领域,增强市场意识,建立与国际协调一致的国家化学测量溯源体系已成为我国化学计量发展所面临的迫切任务。     

Energy transfer in master equation simulations: A new approach

Collisional energy transfer plays a key role in recombination, unimolecular, and chemical activation reactions. For master equation simulations of such reaction systems, it is conventionally assumed that the rate constant for inelastic energy transfer collisions is independent of the excitation energy. However, numerical instabilities and nonphysical results are encountered when normalizing the collision step‐size distribution in the sparse density of states regime at low energies. It is argued here that the conventional assumption is not correct, and it is shown that the numerical problems and nonphysical results are eliminated by making a plausible assumption about the energy dependence of the rate coefficient for inelastic collisions. The new assumption produces a model that is more physically realistic for any reasonable choice of collision step‐size distribution, but more work remains to be done. The resulting numerical algorithm is stable and noniterative. Testing shows that overall accuracy in master equation simulations is better with this new approach than with the conventional one. This new approach is appropriate for all energy‐grained master equation formulations. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 41: 748–763, 2009     

UK delivery of traceable chemical measurements in the 21st century: building on the foundation of the VAM programme

The paper discusses the requirements for achieving traceable chemical measurements in the UK. It is emphasised that success will depend on establishing an appropriate UK chemical measurement infrastructure and encouraging reference and field laboratories to make use of it. The demanding requirements of the BIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) also require a point of focus to link UK reference laboratories into international metrology. Two key factors are described which have provided the UK with the means to meet these requirements and which have established a sound basis on which to build a system of traceable chemical measurements in the 21st century. These two factors are LGC's long-standing role as the UK's national centre for analytical chemistry and the development and delivery over many years of the UK's Valid Analytical Measurement (VAM) Programme.