Comparison of Hydrogen and Gold Bonding in [XHX]−, [XAuX]−, and Isoelectronic [NgHNg]+, [NgAuNg]+ (X=Halogen,Ng=Noble Gas)

Quantum chemical calculations at the MP2/aug‐cc‐pVTZ and CCSD(T)/aug‐cc‐pVTZ levels have been carried out for the title compounds. The electronic structures were analyzed with a variety of charge and energy partitioning methods. All molecules possess linear equilibrium structures with D_∞h symmetry. The total bond dissociation energies (BDEs) of the strongly bonded halogen anions [XHX]^? and [XAuX]^? decrease from [FHF]^? to [IHI]^? and from [FAuF]^? to [IAuI]^?. The BDEs of the noble gas compounds [NgHNg]⁺ and [NgAuNg]⁺ become larger for the heavier atoms. The central hydrogen and gold atoms carry partial positive charges in the cations and even in the anions, except for [IAuI]^?, in which case the gold atom has a small negative charge of ?0.03 e. The molecular electrostatic potentials reveal that the regions of the most positive or negative charges may not agree with the partial charges of the atoms, because the spatial distribution of the electronic charge needs to be considered. The bonding analysis with the QTAIM method suggests a significant covalent character for the hydrogen bonds to the noble gas atoms in [NgHNg]⁺ and to the halogen atoms in [XHX]^?. The covalent character of the bonding in the gold systems [NgAuNg]⁺ and [XAuX]^? is smaller than in the hydrogen compound. The energy decomposition analysis suggests that the lighter hydrogen systems possess dative bonds X^?→H⁺←X^? or Ng→H⁺←Ng while the heavier homologues exhibit electron sharing through two‐electron, three‐center bonds. Dative bonds X^?→Au⁺←X^? and Ng→Au⁺←Ng are also diagnosed for the lighter gold systems, but the heavier compounds possess electron‐shared bonds.     

2‐[6‐(1H‐Benzimidazol‐2‐yl)‐2‐pyridyl]‐1H‐benzimidazol‐3‐ium perchlorate monohydrate

The title compound, C₁₉H₁₄N₅⁺·ClO₄^?·H₂O, contains planar C₁₉H₁₄N₅⁺ cations, perchlorate anions and water mol­ecules. The two closest parallel cations (plane‐to‐plane distance of 3.41 Å), together with two neighbouring perchlorate anions and two water mol­ecules, form an electrically neutral quasi‐dimeric unit. Two acidic H atoms of the cation, both H atoms of the water mol­ecule, the N atoms of the imidazole rings and three of the four O atoms of the perchlorate anion are involved in the hydrogen‐bonding network within the dimeric unit. The remaining third acidic H atom of the imidazole rings and the water mol­ecules complete a two‐dimensional network of hydrogen bonds, thus forming puckered layers of dimers. The angle between the planes of two neighbouring dimeric units in the same layer is 33.25 (3)°.     

Statistically disordered short hydrogen bonds in (pipzH2)(cdoH)2 and a comparison with (pipzH2)(cdo)·H2O (pipz is piperazine and cdoH2 is chelidonic acid)

Two related proton‐transfer compounds, namely piperazine‐1,4‐diium 4‐oxo‐4H‐pyran‐2,6‐dicarboxylate monohydrate, C₄H₁₂N₂²⁺·C₇H₂O₆²⁻·H₂O or (pipzH₂)(cdo)·H₂O, (I), and piperazine‐1,4‐diium bis(6‐carboxy‐4‐oxo‐4H‐pyran‐2‐carboxylate), C₄H₁₂N₂²⁺·2C₇H₃O₆⁻ or (pipzH₂)(cdoH)₂, (II), were obtained by the reaction of 4‐oxo‐4H‐pyran‐2,6‐dicarboxylic acid (chelidonic acid, cdoH₂) and piperazine (pipz). In (I), both carboxyl H atoms of chelidonic acid have been transferred to piperazine to form the piperazine‐1,4‐diium ion. The structure is a monohydrate. All potential N—H donors are involved in N—H...O hydrogen bonds. The water molecule spans two anions via the 4‐oxo group of the pyranose ring and a carboxylate O atom. The hydrogen‐bonding motif is essentially two‐dimensional. The structure is a pseudomerohedral twin. In the asymmetric unit of (II), the anion consists of monodeprotonated chelidonic acid, while the piperazine‐1,4‐diium cation is located on an inversion centre. The single carboxyl H atom is disordered in two respects. Firstly, the disordered H atom is shared equally by both carboxylic acid groups. Secondly, the H atom is statistically disordered between two positions on either side of a centre of symmetry and is engaged in a very short hydrogen‐bonding interaction; the relevant O...O distances are 2.4549 (11) and 2.4395 (11) Å, and the O—H...O angles are 177 (6) and 177 (5)°, respectively. Further hydrogen bonding of the type N—H...O places the (pipzH₂)²⁺ cations in pockets formed by the chains of (cdoH)⁻ anions. In contrast with (I), the (pipzH₂)²⁺ cations form hydrogen‐bonding arrays that are perpendicular to the anions, yielding a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding motif. The structures of both (I) and (II) also feature π–π stacking interactions between aromatic rings.     

The supramolecular architecture in 4,4′‐bipyridinium bis(hydrogen oxalate)

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C₁₀H₁₀N₂²⁺·2C₂HO₄⁻, consists of one half of a 4,4′‐bipyridinium cation, which has inversion symmetry, and a hydrogen oxalate anion, in which an intramolecular hydrogen bond exists. The cations and anions are connected by O—H...O, N—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonds, forming a two‐dimensional network, whereas π–π stacking interactions involving the 4,4′‐bipyridinium cations lead to the formation of a three‐dimensional supramolecular structure. An unusual deca‐atomic ring is formed between two hydrogen oxalate anions, which are linked side‐to‐side via O—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interactions.     

Water‐induced pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bonding motifs in xanthine–inorganic acid complexes

In xanthinium nitrate hydrate [systematic name: 2,6‐dioxo‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydro‐9H‐purin‐7‐ium nitrate monohydrate], C₅H₅N₄O₂⁺·NO₃⁻·H₂O, (I), and xanthinium hydrogen sulfate hydrate [systematic name: 2,6‐dioxo‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydro‐9H‐purin‐7‐ium hydrogen sulfate monohydrate], C₅H₅N₄O₂⁺·HSO₄⁻·H₂O, (II), the xanthine molecules are protonated at the imine N atom with the transfer of an H atom from the inorganic acid. The asymmetric unit of (I) contains a xanthinium cation, a nitrate anion and one water molecule, while that of (II) contains two crystallographically independent xanthinium cations, two hydrogen sulfate anions and two water molecules. A pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bonding motif is formed between the xanthinium cations and the water molecules via N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds in both structures, and leads to the formation of one‐dimensional polymeric tapes. These cation–water tapes are further connected by the respective anions and aggregate into two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded sheets in (I) and three‐dimensional arrangements in (II).     

A 16‐connected three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding network in tetrakis(4‐aminopyridinium) perylene‐3,4,9,10‐tetracarboxylate octahydrate

The novel title organic salt, 4C₅H₇N₂⁺·C₂₄H₈O₈⁴⁻·8H₂O, was obtained from the reaction of perylene‐3,4,9,10‐tetracarboxylic acid (H₄ptca) with 4‐aminopyridine (4‐ap). The asymmetric unit contains half a perylene‐3,4,9,10‐tetracarboxylate (ptca⁴⁻) anion with twofold symmetry, two 4‐aminopyridinium (4‐Hap⁺) cations and four water molecules. Strong N—H...O hydrogen bonds connect each ptca⁴⁻ anion with four 4‐Hap⁺ cations to form a one‐dimensional linear chain along the [010] direction, decorated by additional 4‐Hap⁺ cations attached by weak N—H...O hydrogen bonds to the ptca⁴⁻ anions. Intermolecular O—H...O interactions of water molecules with ptca⁴⁻ and 4‐Hap⁺ ions complete the three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding network. From the viewpoint of topology, each ptca⁴⁻ anion acts as a 16‐connected node by hydrogen bonding to six 4‐Hap⁺ cations and ten water molecules to yield a highly connected hydrogen‐bonding framework. π–π interactions between 4‐Hap⁺ cations, and between 4‐Hap⁺ cations and ptca⁴⁻ anions, further stabilize the three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding network.     

A pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bonding motif consisting of six N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds in trimethoprim formate

The title compound, trimethoprim (TMP) formate [systematic name: 2,4‐di­amino‐5‐(3,4,5‐tri­methoxy­benzyl)­pyrimidin‐1‐ium formate], C₁₄H₁₉N₄O₃⁺·CHO₂^?, reveals a pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bonding motif consisting of six N—H?O hydrogen bonds involving two unpaired TMP cations and two formate anions which are symmetrically disposed. The hydrogen‐bonding motif is strikingly comparable with that observed in other TMP salts where the amino­pyrimidine moieties of the TMP cations are centrosymmetrically paired. These conserved hydrogen‐bonding motifs may serve as robust synthons in crystal engineering and design. The characteristic pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bonding motif and other intermolecular hydrogen bonds operating in the crystal form a two‐dimensional supramolecular sheet structure.     

Hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular networks of N,N′‐bis(4‐pyridylmethyl)oxalamide and 4,4′‐{[oxalylbis(azanediyl)]dimethylene}dipyridinium dinitrate

The molecule of N,N′‐bis(4‐pyridylmethyl)oxalamide, C₁₄H₁₄N₄O₂, (I) or 4py‐ox, has an inversion center in the middle of the oxalamide group. Adjacent molecules are then linked through intermolecular N—H...N and C—H...O hydrogen bonds, forming an extended supramolecular network. 4,4′‐{[Oxalylbis(azanediyl)]dimethylene}dipyridinium dinitrate, C₁₄H₁₆N₄O₂²⁺·2NO₃⁻, (II), contains a diprotonated 4py‐ox cation and two nitrate counter‐anions. Each nitrate ion is hydrogen bonded to four 4py‐ox cations via intermolecular N—H...O and C—H...O interactions. Adjacent 4py‐ox cations are linked through weak C—H...O hydrogen bonding between an α‐pyridinium C atom and an oxalamide O atom, forming a two‐dimensional extended supramolecular network.     

Pefloxacinium methane­sulfonate 0.10‐hydrate

The crystal structure of 4‐(3‐carboxy‐1‐ethyl‐6‐fluoro‐1,4‐di­hydro‐4‐oxo‐7‐quinolyl)‐1‐methyl­piperazinium methane­sulfonate 0.10‐hydrate, C₁₇H₂₁FN₃O₃⁺·CH₃O₃S^?·0.10H₂O, contains pefloxacinium cations, methane­sulfonate anions and a partially occupied water of solvation. The quinoline ring system in the cation is essentially planar. The anions lie parallel to each other about inversion centers. The structure is stabilized by strong hydrogen bonds involving the terminal piperazinyl‐N atom of the cation and an O atom of the anion [N?O 2.739 (2) Å], and a strong intramolecular hydrogen bond between carbonyl and carboxyl groups [O?O 2.523 (2) Å].     

N,N′‐Di­methyl­piperazinium(2+) phos­phonoacetate: hydrogen‐bonded anion sheets containing cation‐templated R66(28) rings

In the title compound, C₆H₁₆N₂²⁺·2C₂H₄O₅P^?, the cations lie across centres of inversion; in the anions, two of the H‐atom sites have 0.50 occupancy. The anions are linked by short O—H?O hydrogen bonds [O?O 2.465 (3)–2.612 (3) Å and O—H?O 165–171°] into sheets of alternating R(12) and R(28) rings, both of which are centrosymmetric; the cations lie at the centres of the larger rings linked to the anion sheet by N—H?O hydrogen bonds [N?O 2.642 (2) Å and N—H?O 176°].     

Cation–Cation Pairing by NCH⋅⋅⋅O Hydrogen Bonds

The pairing of ions of opposite charge is a fundamental principle in chemistry, and is widely applied in synthesis and catalysis. In contrast, cation–cation association remains an elusive concept, lacking in supporting experimental evidence. While studying the structure and properties of 4‐oxopiperidinium salts [OC₅H₈NH₂]X for a series of anions X^? of decreasing basicity, we observed a gradual self‐association of the cations, concluding in the formation of an isolated dicationic pair. In 4‐oxopiperidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide, the cations are linked by N? H???O?C hydrogen bonds to form chains, flanked by hydrogen bonds to the anions. In the tetra(perfluoro‐tert‐butoxy)aluminate salt, the anions are fully separated from the cations, and the cations associate pairwise by N? C? H???O?C hydrogen bonds. The compounds represent the first genuine examples of self‐association of simple organic cations based merely on hydrogen bonding as evidenced by X‐ray structure analysis, and provide a paradigm for an extension of this class of compounds.     

Computational studies on electron and proton transfer in phenol‐imidazole‐base triads

The electron and proton transfer in phenol‐imidazole‐base systems (base = NH₂^? or OH^?) were investigated by density‐functional theory calculations. In particular, the role of bridge imidazole on the electron and proton transfer was discussed in comparison with the phenol‐base systems (base = imidazole, H₂O, NH₃, OH^?, and NH₂^?). In the gas phase phenol‐imidazole‐base system, the hydrogen bonding between the phenol and the imidazole is classified as short strong hydrogen bonding, whereas that between the imidazole and the base is a conventional hydrogen bonding. The n value in spⁿ hybridization of the oxygen and carbon atoms of the phenolic CO sigma bond was found to be closely related to the CO bond length. From the potential energy surfaces without and with zero point energy correction, it can be concluded that the separated electron and proton transfer mechanism is suitable for the gas‐phase phenol‐imidazole‐base triads, in which the low‐barrier hydrogen bond is found and the delocalized phenolic proton can move freely in the single‐well potential. For the gas‐phase oxidized systems and all of the triads in water solvent, the homogeneous proton‐coupled electron transfer mechanism prevails. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2010     

Hybridization: A Chemical Bonding Nature of Atoms

Both the bonding mode and geometry can serve as the chemical bonding nature of central cation, which is essentially determined by the atomic orbital‐hybridization. In this work, we focus on the possible chemical bonding scheme of central cations on the basis of a quantitative analysis of electron domain of an atom. Starting from the hybridization of outer atomic orbitals that are occupied by valence electrons, we studied the possible orbital hybridization scheme of atoms in the periodic table and the corresponding coordination number as well as possible molecular geometries. According to distinct hybrid orbital sets, the chemical bonding of central cations can be classified into three typical types, resulting in the cations with a variety of coordination numbers ranging from 2 to 16. Owing to different hybridization modes, the highest coordination number of cations in IA and IIA groups is larger than that in IB‐VIIIB groups, and the coordination number of lanthanide elements is most abundant. We also selected NaNO₃ , Fe(NO₃ )₃•9H₂O , Zn(NO₃ )₂•6H₂O , Y(NO₃ )₃•3H₂O , and La(NO₃ )₃•6H₂O as examples to confirm the direct relationship between chemical bonding characteristics and orbital hybrid set by IR spectra. The present study opens the door to reveal the chemical bonding nature of atoms on the basis of hybridization and will provide theoretical guides in structural design at an atomic level.     

Different supramolecular assemblies in two 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of sulfobenzoic acids with aromatic amines

Two 1:1 proton‐transfer complexes of sulfobenzoic acids with aromatic amines, namely 4‐[2‐(4‐pyridyl)ethenyl]pyridinium 2‐carboxybenzenesulfonate, C₁₂H₁₁N₂⁺·C₇H₅O₅S⁻, (I), and 1,10‐phenanthrolin‐1‐ium 4‐carboxybenzenesulfonate dihydrate, C₁₂H₉N₂⁺·C₇H₅O₅S⁻·2H₂O, (II), have very different hydrogen‐bonding patterns compared with reported organic sulfobenzoic acid complexes. In (I), two cations and two anions form a four‐molecule loop, in which π–π interactions occur. In (II), the anions and water molecules form a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding network, while the cations only act as pendant components. The water molecules play a central role in the formation of the abundant hydrogen‐bonding architecture in (II). The relative poorness and richness of hydrogen bonds in (I) and (II), respectively, give rise to novel hydrogen‐bonding patterns.     

(8‐Dimethylamino‐1‐naphthyl)dimethylammonium 3‐carboxy‐1,4,5,‐6,7,7‐hexachlorobicyclo[2.2.1]hept‐5‐ene‐2‐carboxylate hydrate

The structure of the title compound, C₁₄H₁₉N₂⁺·C₉H₃Cl₆O₄^?·H₂O, consists of singly ionized 1,4,5,6,7,7‐hexachlorobicyclo[2.2.1]hept‐5‐ene‐2,3‐dicarboxylic acid anions and protonated 1,8‐bis(dimethylamino)naphthalene cations. In the (8‐dimethylamino‐1‐napthyl)dimethylammonium cat­ion, a strong disordered intramolecular hydrogen bond is formed with N?N = 2.589 (3) Å. The geometry and occupancy obtained in the final restrained refinement suggest that the disordered hydrogen bond may be asymmetric. Water mol­ecules link the anion dimers into infinite chains via hydrogen bonding.     

Polysulfonylamine. CLXXVIII Onium‐Salze des Benzol‐1,2‐di(sulfonyl)amins (HZ): Eine zweite Kristallform des Ammonium‐Salzes NH4Z·H2O und Kristallstruktur des Bis(triphenylphosphoranyliden)ammonium‐Salzes [Ph3PNPPh3]Z

Polysulfonylamines. CLXXVIII. Onium Salts of Benzene‐1,2‐di(sulfonyl)amine (HZ): A Second Crystal Form of the Ammonium Salt NH₄Z·H₂O and Crystal Structure of the Bis(triphenylphosphoranylidene)ammonium Salt [Ph₃PNPPh₃]Z A dimorphic form of NH₄Z·H₂O, where Z^? is N‐deprotonated ortho‐benzenedisulfonimide, has been obtained and structurally characterized (previously known form 1A : monoclinic, P2₁/c, Z′ = 1; new polymorph 1B : monoclinic, P2₁/n, Z′ = 1). Both structures are dominated by an abundance of classical hydrogen bonds N⁺–H/O–H···O=S/OH₂, whereby the anionic N^? function does not act as an acceptor. The major difference between the dimorphs arises from the topology of the hydrogen bond network, which is two‐dimensional in 1A , leading to a packing of discrete lamellar layers, but three‐dimensional in 1B . Moreover, the latter network is reinforced by a set of weak C–H··O/N hydrogen bonds, whereas the layered structure of 1A displays only one independent C–H···O bond, providing a link between adjacent layers. The compound [Ph₃PNPPh₃]Z ( 2 , monoclinic, P2₁/c, Z′ = 1) is the first structurally authenticated example of an ionic Z^? derivative in which the cation contains neither metal bonding sites nor strong hydrogen bond donors. This structure exhibits columns of anions, surrounded by four parallel columns of cations, giving a square array. The large cations are associated into a three‐dimensional framework via weak C–H···C(π) interactions and an offset face‐to‐face phenyl interaction, while the anions occupy tunnels in this framework and are extensively bonded to the surrounding cations by C–H···O/N^? hydrogen bonds and C–H···C(π) interactions.     

Supra­molecular hydrogen‐bonding networks in bis­(adeninium) phthalate phthalic acid 1.45‐hydrate

In the title compound, 2C₅H₆N₅⁺·C₈H₄O₄²⁻·C₈H₆O₄·1.45H₂O, the asymmetric unit comprises two adeninium cations, two half phthalate anions with crystallographic C₂ symmetry, one neutral phthalic acid mol­ecule, and one fully occupied and one partially occupied site (0.45) for water mol­ecules. The adeninium cations form N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds with the phthalate anions. The cations also form infinite one‐dimensional polymeric ribbons via N—H⋯N inter­actions. In the crystal packing, hydrogen‐bonded columns of cations, anions and phthalate anions extend parallel to the c axis. The water mol­ecules crosslink adjacent columns into hydrogen‐bonded layers.     

Poly[[aqua(4,4′‐diazenediyldibenzoato‐κ4O,O′:O′′,O′′′)cadmium(II)]: a twofold interpenetrated three‐dimensional coordination polymer of PtS topology

In the title coordination compound, [Cd(C₁₄H₈N₂O₄)(H₂O)]_n, the Cd^II cation and the coordinated water molecule lie on a twofold axis, whereas the ligand lies on an inversion center. The Cd^II center is five‐coordinated in a distorted square‐pyramidal geometry by four carboxylate O atoms from four different 4,4′‐diazenediyldibenzoate (ddb) anions and one water O atom. The three‐dimensional frameworks thus formed by the bridging ddb anions interpenetrate to generate a three‐dimensional PtS‐type network. Additionally, the coordination water molecule and the carboxylate O atom form a hydrogen‐bonding interaction, stabilizing the three‐dimensional framework structure.     

Coordination‐directed and Hydrogen‐bonded Assembly of Supramolecular Architectures Constructed from Diverse Coordination of Linear,Triangular, Tetragonal Pyramid,Trigonal Bipyramid,and Octahedral Mononuclear Units

Reaction of a imidazole phenol ligand 4‐(imidazlo‐1‐yl)phenol (L) with 3d metal salts afforded four complexes, namely, [Ni(L)₆] · (NO₃)₂ ( 1 ), [Cu(L)₄(H₂O)] · (NO₃)₂ · (H₂O)₅ ( 2 ), [Zn(L)₄(H₂O)] · (NO₃)₂ · (H₂O) ( 3 ), and [Ag₂(L)₄] · SO₄ ( 4 ). All complexes are composed of monomeric units with diverse coordination arrangements and corresponding anions. All the hydroxyl groups of monomeric cations are used as hydrogen‐bond donors to form O–H ··· O hydrogen bonds. However, the coordination habit of different metal ions produces various supramolecular structures. The Ni^II atom shows octahedral arrangement in 1 , featuring a 3D twofold inclined interpenetrated network through O–H ··· O hydrogen bond and π–π stacking interaction. The Cu^II atom of 2 displays square pyramidal environment. The O–H ··· O hydrogen bond from the [Cu(L)₄(H₂O)]²⁺ cation and lattice water molecule as well as π–π stacking produce one‐dimensional open channels. NO₃^– ions and lattice water molecules are located in the channels. 3 is a 3D supramolecular network, in which Zn^II has a trigonal bipyramid arrangement. Two different rings intertwined with each other are observed. The Ag^I in 4 has linear and triangular coordination arrangements. The mononuclear units are assembled into a 1D chain by hydrogen bonding interaction from coordination units and SO₄^2– anions.     

Di­aqua­bis­[μ‐(R,R)‐tartrato‐κ4O1,O2:O3,O4]­dinickel(II) trihydrate

In the crystal structure of the title compound, [Ni₂(C₄H₄O₆)₂(H₂O)₂]·3H₂O, two nickel cations, two tartrate anions and two water mol­ecules form the dimeric complex. Each nickel cation is in a distorted octahedral environment composed of four O atoms of two crystallographically independent tartrate anions, one water mol­ecule and one O atom of a symmetry‐equivalent tartrate anion. The asymmetric unit contains three additional water mol­ecules which are connected via hydrogen bonding.