Reactions of Distibanes with [Fe2(CO)9]: Synthesis,Structure and DFT Calculations of [(Et2Sb)4Fe4(CO)14], [(nPr2Sb)4Fe3(CO)10], [{(Me3SiCH2)2Sb}4Fe2(CO)6], and [2‐(Me2NCH2)C6H4SbFe2(CO)8]

The iron complexes [(Et₂Sb)₄Fe₄(CO)₁₄] ( 1 ), [(nPr₂Sb)₄Fe₃(CO)₁₀] ( 2 ), [{(Me₃SiCH₂)₂Sb}₄Fe₂(CO)₆] ( 3 ), and [2‐(Me₂NCH₂)C₆H₄SbFe₂(CO)₈] ( 4 ) were prepared by reactions of distibanes with Fe₂(CO)₉. Compounds 1 – 4 were characterized by X‐ray diffraction, ¹H NMR and IR spectroscopy as well as mass spectrometry; complex 1 was additionally characterized by density functional calculations.     

Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structures of Ru3(CO)9(μ‐arphos)(L) [L = AsPh3, As(m‐C6H4Me)3, As(p‐C6H4Me)3]

Three new triruthenium clusters, Ru₃(CO)₉(μ‐arphos)AsPh₃ ( 1 ), Ru₃(CO)₉(μ‐arphos)As(m‐C₆H₄Me)₃ ( 2 ), and Ru₃(CO)₉(μ‐arphos)As(p‐C₆H₄Me)₃ ( 3 ) were synthesized via thermal reactions of Ru₃(CO)₁₀(μ‐arphos) with different tertiary arsine ligands [AsPh₃, As(m‐C₆H₄Me)₃, As(p‐C₆H₄Me)₃]. All these complexes were fully characterized by elemental analysis, FT‐IR, NMR spectroscopy, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Ansa‐Complexes of [Mn(η5‐C5H5)(η6‐C6H6)]: Preparation,Characterization, and Reactivity of [n]Manganoarenophanes (n=1, 2, 3)

We report the synthesis of [n]manganoarenophanes (n=1, 2) featuring boron, silicon, germanium, and tin as ansa‐bridging elements. Their preparation was achieved by salt‐elimination reactions of the dilithiated precursor [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄Li)(η⁶‐C₆H₅Li)]?pmdta (pmdta=N,N,N′,N′,N′′‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine) with corresponding element dichlorides. Besides characterization by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis, the identity of two single‐atom‐bridged derivatives, [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] and [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SiPh₂], could also be determined by X‐ray structural analysis. We investigated for the first time the reactivity of these ansa‐cyclopentadienyl–benzene manganese compounds. The reaction of the distannyl‐bridged complex [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)Sn₂tBu₄] with elemental sulfur was shown to proceed through the expected oxidative addition of the Sn?Sn bond to give a triatomic ansa‐bridge. The investigation of the ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) capability of [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] with [Pt(PEt₃)₃] showed that an unexpected, unselective insertion into the C_ipso?Sn bonds of [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] had occurred.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of [Nd(η6‐1, 3, 5‐C6H3Me3)‐(AlCl4)3](C6H6) and Structural Comparison of Ln(η6‐arene)‐(AlCl4)3

Reaction of Ndcl₃ with AlCl₃ and mesitylene in benzene gives complex [Nd(η⁶‐1, 3, 5‐C₆H₃Me₃)‐(AlCl₄)₃](C₆H₆) (1) which was characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectra, MS and X‐ray diffractions. The X‐ray determination indicates that 1 has a distorted pentagonal bipyramidal geometry and crystallizes in the monoclinic, space group P2₁/n with a = 0.9586(2), b = 1.1717(5), c = 2.8966(7) nm, β = 90.85 (2)°, V = 3.2529 (6) nm³,D_c= 1.573 g/cm³, Z = 4. A comparison of bond parameters for all the reported Ln (η⁶‐Ar) (AlCl₄)₃ complexes indicates that the bond distance of La? C is shortened with the increasing of methyl group on benzene and with the decreasing of radius of lanthanide ions.     

Die Reaktion von tBu2P‐P=P(Me)tBu2 mit [Fe2(CO)9] und [(η2‐C8H14)2Fe(CO)3]

^tBu₂P‐P=P(Me)^tBu₂ reacts with [Fe₂(CO)₉] to give [μ‐(1, 2, 3:4‐η‐^tBu₂P¹‐P²‐P³‐P^4tBu₂){Fe(CO)₃}{Fe(CO)₄}] ( 1 ) and [trans‐(^tBu₂MeP)₂Fe(CO)₃]( 2 ). With [(η²‐C₈H₁₄)₂Fe(CO)₃] in addition to [μ‐(1, 2, 3:4‐η‐^tBu₂P¹‐P²‐P³‐P^4tBu₂){Fe(CO)₂PMe^tBu₂}‐{Fe(CO)₄}] ( 10 ) and 2 also [(μ‐P^tBu₂){μ‐P‐Fe(CO)₃‐PMe^tBu₂}‐{Fe(CO)₃}₂(Fe‐Fe)]( 9 ) is formed. 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a = 875.0(2), b = 1073.2(2), c = 3162.6(6) pm and β = 94.64(3)?. 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a = 1643.4(7), b = 1240.29(6), c = 2667.0(5) pm and β = 97.42(2)?. 9 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n with a = 1407.5(5), b = 1649.7(5), c = 1557.9(16) pm and β = 112.87(2)?.     

(Carbonyl)Iron‐Selenolates: New Synthetic Methods and Reactions with Electrophiles. Crystal Structures of [(CO)6Fe2(μ‐SeR)2]; R = Me3SiCH2 and p‐O2NC6H4CH2, {(CO)6Fe2[μ‐η2‐Se,Se′‐o‐(SeCH2C6H4CH2Se)]}, and [(CO)6Fe2(μ‐SeFe(CO)2cp)2]

The reactions of Fe(CO)₅ or Fe₃(CO)₁₂ with NaBEt₃H or KB[CH(CH₃)C₂H₅]₃H, respectively and treatment of the resulting carbonylates M₂Fe(CO)₄, M = Na, K with elemental selenium in appropriate ratios lead to the formation of M₂[Fe₂(CO)₆(μ‐Se)₂]. Subsequent reactions with organo halides or the complex fragment cpFe(CO)₂⁺, cp = η⁵‐C₅H₅ afforded the selenolato complexes [Fe₂(CO)₆(μ‐SeR)₂], R = CH₂SiMe₃ ( 1 ), CH₂Ph ( 2 ), p‐CH₂C₆H₄NO₂ ( 3 ), o‐CH₂C₆H₄CH₂ ( 4 ) and cpFe(CO)₂⁺ ( 5 ) in moderate to good yields. A similar reaction employing Ru₃(CO)₁₂, Se and p‐O₂NC₆H₄CH₂Br leads to the formation of the corresponding organic diselenide. The X‐ray structures of 1 , 3 , 4 and 5 were determined and revealed butterfly structures of the Fe₂Se₂ cores. The substituents in 1 , 3  and 5 adopt different conformations depending on their steric demand. In 4 , the conformation is fixed because of the chelate effect of the ligand. The Fe–Se bond lengths lie in the range 235 to 240 pm, with corresponding Fe–Fe bond lengths of 254 to 256 pm. The ⁷⁷Se NMR data of the new complexes are discussed and compared with the corresponding data of related complexes.     

Preparation,Spectroscopic Properties,and Crystal Structures of Fe2(CO)6(μ‐CO)(μ‐CF2)2, Fe2(CO)6(μ‐CO)2(μ‐CF2), and Fe2(CO)6(μ‐CF2)(PPh3)2 – Theoretical Studies of Methylenic vs. Carbonyl Bridges in Diiron Complexes

The reaction of Na₂[Fe(CO)₄] with Br₂CF₂ in n‐pentane generates a mixture of the compounds (CO)₃Fe(μ‐CO)_3–n(μ‐CF₂)_nFe(CO)₃ ( 2 , n = 2; 3 , n = 1) in low yields with 3 as the main product. 3 is obtained free from 2 by reacting Br₂CF₂ with Na₂[Fe₂(CO)₈]. The non‐isolable monomeric complex (CO)₄Fe=CF₂ ( 1 ) can probably considered as the precursor for 2 . 3 reacts with PPh₃ with replacement of two CO ligands to form Fe₂(CO)₆(μ‐CF₂)(PPh₃)₂ ( 4 ). The complexes 2 – 4 were characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. While the structure of 2 is strictly similar to that of Fe₂(CO)₉, the structure of 3 can better be described as a resulting from superposition of the two enantiomers 3 a and 3 b with two semibridging CO groups. Quantum chemical DFT calculations for the series (CO)₃Fe(μCO)_3–n(μ‐CF₂)_nFe(CO)₃ (n = 0, 1, 2, 3) as well as for the corresponding (μ‐CH₂) derivatives indicate that the progressively larger σ donor and π acceptor properties for the bridging ligands, in the order CO < CF₂ < CH₂, favor a stronger Fe–Fe bond.     

Trapping of Tricarbonyl(η1,η2‐homoallyl)iron and Tricarbonyl(η3‐allyl)iron Anion Intermediates with 2‐(Phenylsulfonyl)‐3‐phenyloxaziridine

The addition of reactive carbanions to (η⁴‐1,3‐diene)Fe(CO)₃ complexes at ?78 °C and 25 °C produced putative homoallyl and allyl anion complexes, respectively. Reaction of the reactive intermediates with 2‐(phenylsulfonyl)‐3‐phenyloxaziridine afforded nucleophilic substituted (η⁴‐1,3‐diene)Fe(CO)₃ complexes.     

2,6‐Bis(pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine as Meridional Capping Ligand: Synthesis,Characterization, and Crystal Structure of the First Corresponding Hexanuclear Iron(III) Complex

Based on the 2,6‐bis(pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine ligand (H₂bpp) the hexanuclear iron(III) complex [Fe₆(bpp)₄(μ₃‐O)₂(μ‐OMe)₃(μ‐OH)Cl₂] ( 1 ) was synthesized. The reaction with iron(II) chloride and additional pyridine leads to the exclusive formation of the complex through self‐assembly process. Six octahedrally coordinated iron atoms are linked through the pyrazolido groups of four H₂bpp ligands. These are further linked through bridging hydroxido, methoxido, and oxido groups. The complex has been characterized by IR spectroscopy, ESI mass spectrometry, elemental analysis and X‐ray crystallography. Temperature‐dependent magnetic measurements indicate strong antiferromagnetic exchange interaction between the high‐spin iron(III) ions within the complex, which leads to an S = 0 spin ground state. As a result of the two Fe3(μ₃‐O) fragments two frustrated exchange pathways are present. In addition the properties of H₂bpp as a potential capping ligand for the synthesis of heteroleptic trinuclear complexes based on the triaminoguanidine core is investigated.     

Photomagnetic Switching of the Complex [Nd(dmf)4(H2O)3(μ‐CN)Fe(CN)5]⋅H2O Analyzed by Single‐Crystal X‐Ray Diffraction

X‐ray vision : Single‐crystal XRD experiments (see picture) reveal the excited‐state structure of the photomagnetic heterobimetallic title complex. The system shows a decrease in all the iron–ligand bond lengths, suggesting that photoexcitation involves a ligand‐to‐metal charge transfer or a change in the superexchange coupling between the metal centers.

     

Synthesis,Reactivity and Crystal Structures of the Palladium(II) Complexes with the Pyrimidine Containing Ligand: Crystal Structures of [Pd(PPh3)(η1‐C4H3N2)(η2‐S2CNC4H8)] and [Pd(PPh3)(η1‐C4H3N2)(η2‐Tp)]

Treatment of Pd(PPh₃)₄ with 5‐bromo‐pyrimidine [C₄H₃N₂Br] in dichloromethane at ambient temperature cause the oxidative addition reaction to produce the palladium complex [Pd(PPh₃)₂(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)(Br)], 1 , by substituting two triphenylphosphine ligands. In acetonitrile solution of 1 in refluxing temperature for 1 day, it do not undergo displacement of the triphenylphosphine ligand to form the dipalladium complex [Pd(PPh₃)Br]₂{μ,η²‐(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)}₂, or bromide ligand to form chelating pyrimidine complex [Pd(PPh₃)₂(η²‐C₄H₃N₂)]Br. Complex 1 reacted with bidentate ligand, NH₄S₂CNC₄H₈, and tridentate ligand, KTp {Tp = tris(pyrazoyl‐1‐yl)borate}, to obtain the η²‐dithiocarbamate η¹‐pyrimidine complex [Pd(PPh₃)(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)(η²‐S₂CNC₄H₈)], 4 and η²‐Tp η¹‐pyrimidine complex [Pd(PPh₃)(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)(η²‐Tp)], 5 , respectively. Complexes 4 and 5 are characterized by X‐ray diffraction analyses.     

[μ‐(Me3SiCH2Sb)5–Sb1,Sb3–{W(CO)5}2] und [{(Me3Si)2CHSb}3Fe(CO)4] – zwei cyclische Komplexe mit Antimon‐Liganden

Syntheses and Crystal Structures of [μ‐(Me₃SiCH₂Sb)₅–Sb¹,Sb³–{W(CO)₅}₂] and [{(Me₃Si)₂CHSb}₃Fe(CO)₄] – Two Cyclic Complexes with Antimony Ligands cyclo‐(Me₃SiCH₂Sb)₅ reacts with [(THF)W(CO)₅] (THF = tetrahydrofuran) to form cyclo‐[μ‐(Me₃SiCH₂Sb)₅–Sb¹,Sb³–{W(CO)₅}₂] ( 1 ). The heterocycle cyclo‐ [{(Me₃Si)₂CHSb}₃Fe(CO)₄] ( 2 ) is formed by an insertion reaction of cyclo‐[(Me₃Si)₂CHSb]₃ and [Fe₂(CO)₉]. The crystal structures of 1 and 2 are reported.     

Nucleophilic Addition Reactions of Tricarbonyl [η5−1-(Phenylsulfonyl)cyclohexadienyl]iron(I) Complex

Hydride abstraction of tricarbonyl[η⁴-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-1,3-cyclohexadiene]iron(0) complex 2 with Ph₃C⁺PF₆^? regiospecifically provided the title compound 3 in excellent yield. Cationic complex 3 could react with a variety of nucleophiles in good yields. Soft nucleophiles prefer to attack at the C-5 position, whereas hard nucleophiles such as methyllithium and the enolate of ethyl acetate gave the C-5 as well as the C-2 addition products. Some synthetic applications of the addition products were also studied.     

Preparation and Structure of [(η5‐C5H5)Fe(CO){C(O)Ph}2]2Li2(2,2′‐Bipyridine): A Sequential Treatment of Nucleophile Followed by Lewis Base

Unable to elaborate (η⁵‐C₅H₅)Fe(CO)₂C(O)Ph by the nucleophile/electrophile sequences, the treatment of nucleophile PhLi followed by Lewis base 2,2′‐bipyridine instead leads to the meaningful isolation of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Fe(CO) {C(O)Ph}₂]₂Li₂(2,2′‐bipyridine).     

Photochromic properties of η6‐2H‐chromene chromium tricarbonyl complexes

In the 2H‐chromene series, complexation of the aromatic ring with chromium tricarbonyl, under thermal conditions, is totally regioselective even when aromatic substituents are introduced on the pyran ring. The complexation stabilizes the open form of these photochromic compounds and reduces the thermal bleaching kinetic constant. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

苯二甲酰基桥联铁硫配合物[(μ-RS)Fe2(CO)6]2(μ-OCC6H4CO-μ)的合成及表征

通过由Fe₃(CO)₁₂、RSH和Et₃N所形成的[(μ-CO)(μ-RS)Fe₂(CO)₆]Et₃NH于室温下分别与对或间苯二甲酰氯的原位反应,首次合成6个结构新颖的苯二甲酰基桥联铁硫配合物[(μ-RS)·Fe₂(CO)₆]₂(μ-p-OCC₆H₄CO-p-μ)(R=Et,n-Bu,t-Bu)以及[(μ-RS)Fe₂(CO)₆]₂(μ-m-OCC₆H₄CO-m-μ)(R=n-Pr,n-Bu,t-Bu).经元素分析、IR光谱及¹HNMR表征了它们的结构,并讨论了产物的生成过程.此外,还提出了合成对苯二甲酰氯的一种新方法.     

Cleavage of the Fe—Fe Bond of （Me2SiSiMe2） [η^5－C5H4Fe（CO）2]2 with Na／Hg and Molecular Structure of the Ring－Opened Complex

The reaction of the rifle cyclic complex (1) with sodium amalgam in THF resulted in the expected cleavage of the Fe-Fe bond to afford his-sodium salt ( Me2SiSiMe2 ) [η^5-C5H4Fe(CO)2]2 (4). The latter was not isolated and was used directly to react with MeI, PhCH2Cl, CH3C(O)Cl, PhC(O)Cl,Cy3SnCl (Cy= cyclohexyl) or Ph3SnCl to afford corresponding ring-opened derivatives (Me2SiSiMe2) [η^5-C5H4Fe(CO)2]2 [5, R=Me; 6, R=PhCH2; 7, R=CH3C(O); 8, R=PhC(O); 9, R = Cy3Sn or 10, R = Ph3Sn ]. The crystal and molecular structures of 10 were determined by X-ray diffraction analysis. The molecule took the desired ant/ conformation around the Si-Si bond. The length of the Si--Si bond is 0.2343(3)nm, which is essentially identical to that in the cyclic structure of 1[0.2346(4) tun]. This result unambiguously demonstrates that the Si--Si bond in the cyclic structure of 1 is not subject to obvious strain.     

Synthesis,Reactivity, and Crystal Structure of the η2‐Thiocarbamoyl Palladium Complex [Pd(PPh3)2(η2‐SCNMe2)][PF6]

The η¹‐thiocarbamoyl palladium complexes [Pd(PPh₃)(η¹‐SCNMe₂)(η²‐S₂R)] (R = P(OEt)₂, 2 ; CNEt₂, 3 ) and trans‐[Pd(PPh₃)₂(η¹‐SCNMe₂)(η¹‐Spy)], 4 , (pyS: pyridine‐2‐thionate) are prepared by reacting the η²‐thiocarbamoyl palladium complex [Pd(PPh₃)₂(η²‐SCNMe₂)][PF₆], 1 with (EtO)₂PS₂NH₄, Et₂NCS₂Na, and pySK in methanol at room temperature, respectively. Treatment of 1 with dppm (dppm: bis(diphenylphosphino)methane) in dichloromethane at room temperature gives complex [Pd(PPh₃)(η¹‐SCNMe₂)(η²‐dppm)] [PF₆], 5 . All of the complexes are identified by spectroscopic methods and complex 1 is determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Photomagnetic Switching of Heterometallic Complexes [M(dmf)4(H2O)3(μ‐CN)Fe(CN)5]⋅H2O (M=Nd,La, Gd,Y) Analyzed by Single‐Crystal X‐ray Diffraction and Ab Initio Theory

Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction measurements have been carried out on [Nd(dmf)₄(H₂O)₃(μ‐CN)Fe(CN)₅]?H₂O ( 1 ; dmf=dimethylformamide), [Nd(dmf)₄(H₂O)₃(μ‐CN)Co(CN)₅]?H₂O ( 2 ), [La(dmf)₄(H₂O)₃(μ‐CN)Fe(CN)₅]?H₂O ( 3 ), [Gd(dmf)₄(H₂O)₃(μ‐CN)Fe(CN)₅]?H₂O ( 4 ), and [Y(dmf)₄(H₂O)₃(μ‐CN)Fe(CN)₅]?H₂O ( 5 ), at 15(2) K with and without UV illumination of the crystals. Significant changes in unit‐cell parameters were observed for all the iron‐containing complexes, whereas 2 showed no response to UV illumination. Photoexcited crystal structures have been determined for 1 , 3 , and 4 based on refinements of two‐conformer models, and excited‐state occupancies of 78.6(1), 84(6), and 86.6(7) % were reached, respectively. Significant bond‐length changes were observed for the Fe–ligand bonds (up to 0.19 Å), the cyano bonds (up to 0.09 Å), and the lanthanide–ligand bonds (up to 0.10 Å). Ab initio theoretical calculations were carried out for the experimental ground‐state geometry of 1 to understand the electronic structure changes upon UV illumination. The calculations suggest that UV illumination gives a charge transfer from the cyano groups on the iron atom to the lanthanide ion moiety, {Nd(dmf)₄(H₂O)₃}, with a distance of approximately 6 Å from the iron atom. The charge transfer is accompanied by a reorganization of the spin state on the {Fe(CN)₆} complex, and a change in geometry that produces a metastable charge‐transfer state with an increased number of unpaired electrons, thus accounting for the observed photomagnetic effect.