The Stereospecific Substitution of the Xenon Atom in cis‐Perfluoroalk‐1‐enylxenon(II) Salts by Hydrogen,Halogens, and the Phenyl Group

The substitution of the xenon atom in reactions of [cis‐C_nF_2n+1CF=CFXe][Y] salts with benzene, iodide, and bromide anions in propionitrile solution by the phenyl group, or iodine, and bromine atoms, respectively, occurred stereospecifically. When a propionitrile solution of [cis‐C₂F₅CF=CFXe][AsF₆] was kept at —40 °C without an additional reactant, the fluoroalkene cis‐C₂F₅CF=CFH was the only isomer obtained.     

(Fluoroorgano)fluoroboranes and ‐borates. 7 [1] The Reaction of RFBF2 and K [RFBF3] (RF = perfluorophenyl‐, perfluoroalk‐1‐enyl‐ and perfluoroalkyl) with Xenon Difluoride in Anhydrous HF

The dissolution of (perfluoroorgano)difluoroboranes R_FBF₂ in anhydrous HF (aHF) resulted in equilibrium mixtures of the starting borane and different kinds of acid‐base products: [H₂F] [R_FBF₂(F · HF)] (R_F = C₆F₅, cis‐C₂F₅CF=CF, trans‐C₄F₉CF=CF) or [H₂F] [R_FBF₃] (R_F = C₆F₁₃). In aHF the aryl compounds C₆F₅BF₂ and K [C₆F₅BF₃] showed two parallel reactivities with XeF₂: xenodeborylation (formation of the [C₆F₅Xe]⁺ cation) and fluorine addition to the aryl group. In aHF perfluoroalk‐1‐enyldifluoroboranes R_FBF₂ as well as potassium perfluoroalk‐1‐enyltrifluoroborates K [R_FBF₃] (R_F = cis‐C₂F₅CF=CF, trans‐C₄F₉CF=CF) underwent only fluorine addition across the carbon‐carbon double bond under the action of XeF₂. Potassium perfluorohexyltrifluoroborate K [C₆F₁₃BF₃] did not react with XeF₂ in aHF.     

A Widely Applicable Synthetic Approach to Alk‐1‐yn‐1‐yl(polyfluoroorganyl)‐iodonium Salts [(RC≡C)(R′)I][BF4]

The reaction of alkynyldifluoroboranes RC≡CBF₂ (R = (CH₃)₃C, CF₃, (CF₃)₂CF) with organyliodine difluoride R′IF₂ bearing electron‐withdrawing polyfluoroorganyl groups R′ = C₆F₅, (CF₃)₂CFCF=CF, C₄F₉, and CF₃CH₂ leads to the corresponding alkynyl(organyl)iodonium salts [(RC≡C)(R′)I][BF₄]. This approach uses a widely applicable method as demonstrated for a representative series of polyfluorinated aryl‐, alkenyl‐, and alkyliodine difluorides. Generally, these syntheses proceed with good yields and deliver pure iodonium salts. The distinct electrophilic nature of their [(RC≡C)(R′)I]⁺ cations is deduced from multinuclear magnetic resonance data. Within the series of new iodonium salts [CF₃C≡C(C₄F₉)I][BF₄] is an intrinsic unstable one and decomposed forming CF₃C≡CI and C₄F₁₀.     

The Reactivity of Potassium Polyfluoroaryl‐, Polyfluoroalkenyl‐, and Perfluoroalkyltrifluoroborates and their Hydrocarbon Analogues towards Acids of Different Strength: A Systematic Study of the Hydrodeboration

The hydrodeboration of the (fluoroorgano)trifluoroborates K [R_FBF₃] [R_F = C₆F₅, XCF=CF (X = F, cis‐ and trans‐Cl, C₃F₇O, cis‐C₂F₅, trans‐C₄F₉, ‐C₄H₉) and C₆F₁₃] and of the organotrifluoroborates K [RBF₃] (R = C₆H₅, cis‐ and trans‐C₄H₉CH=CH, C₄H₉ and C₈H₁₇) with CH₃CO₂H (100 %), CF₃CO₂H (100 %), aqueous HF and anhydrous HF was investigated. In the alkenyltrifluoroborates K [R'CF=CFBF₃] the formal replacement of BF₃ by a proton occurred stereospecifically under retention of the configuration. The ¹⁹F NMR spectra of K [R_FBF₃] in acids indicate strong interactions of the BF₃ group with protons or acid molecules.     

Photoinduced Isomerization of Potassium Polyfluoroalk‐1‐enyltrifluoroborates

The UV irradition of K [RCF=CFBF₃] [R = C₄F₉ (trans), C₂F₅ (cis), C₆F₁₃ (cis), Cl (cis/trans 1 : 1)] in acetone led to cis/trans‐isomerization with a final cis/trans composition 7 : 3. In the case of R = C₄H₉ (trans) or C₃F₇O (cis/trans 25 : 75) the photoisomerization was accompanied by a partial decomposition.     

Synthesis and Spectroscopic Characterization of Potassium Polyfluoroalken‐1‐yltrifluoroborates

The potassium fluoroborates K[RCF=CFBF₃] (R = F, Cl (cis‐/trans‐mixture), trans‐C₄F₉, cis‐C₂F₅, cis‐C₆F₁₃, trans‐C₄H₉, trans‐C₆H₅) were prepared by fluoridation (methoxide‐fluoride substitution with K[HF₂]) of RCF=CFB(OMe)₂ and Li[RCF=CFB(OMe)₃] which were obtained from RCF=CFLi and B(OMe)₃. The K[RCF=CFBF₃] salts were characterized by their ¹H, ¹¹B, ¹⁹F NMR and IR spectra.     

From hypervalent xenon difluoride and aryliodine(III) difluorides to onium salts: Scope and limitation of acidic fluoroorganic reagents in the synthesis of fluoroorgano xenon(II) and iodine(III) onium salts

Fluorinated organodifluoroboranes R_fBF₂ are in general suitable reagents to transform XeF₂ and RIF₂ into the corresponding onium tetrafluoroborate salts [R_fXe][BF₄] and [R(R_f)I][BF₄], respectively. (4-C₅F₄N)BF₂ and trans-CF₃CFCFBF₂ which represent boranes of high acidity form no Xe-C onium salts in reactions with XeF₂ but give the desired iodonium salts with RIF₂ (R = C₆F₅, o-, m-, p-C₆FH₄). The reaction of (4-C₅F₄N)BF₂ with XeF₂ ends with a XeF₂-borane adduct. C₆F₅Xe(4-C₅F₄N), the first Xe-(4-C₅F₄N) compound, was obtained when C₆F₅XeF was reacted with Cd(4-C₅F₄N)₂. We describe the synthesis of (4-C₅F₄N)IF₂ and reactions of (4-C₅F₄N)IF₂ and C₆F₅IF₂ with (4-C₅F₄N)BF₂. Analogous to [(4-C₅F₄N)₂I][BF₄] and [C₆F₅(4-C₅F₄N)I][BF₄] aryl(perfluoroalkenyl)iodonium salts [R(R′)I][BF₄] were obtained from RIF₂ (R = C₆F₅, o-, m-, p-C₆FH₄) and R′BF₂ (R′ = trans-CF₃CFCF, CF₂CF). The gas phase fluoride affinities pF⁻ of selected fluoroorganodifluoroboranes R_fBF₂ and their hydrocarbon analogs are calculated (B3LYP/6-31+G^*) and discussed with respect to their potential to introduce R_f-groups into hypervalent EF₂ bonds. Four aspects which influence the transformation of hypervalent EF₂ bonds (E = Xe, R′I) under the action of Lewis acidic reagents RAF_n−1 (A = B, P; n = 3, 5) into the corresponding [RE][AF_n+1] salts are presented and the important role of the acidity is emphasized. Fluoride affinities may help to plan the introduction of organo groups into EF₂ moieties and to expand the types of acidic reagents. Thus C₆H₅PF₄ with a pF⁻ value comparable to that of R_fBF₂ compounds is able to introduce the C₆H₅ group into RIF₂ (R = C₆F₅, p-C₆FH₄).     

Hydrogallierungsreaktionen mit den Monoalkinen H5C6‐C≡C‐SiMe3 und H5C6‐C≡C‐CMe3 – cis/trans‐Isomerie und Substituentenaustausch

Hydrogallation Reactions Involving the Monoalkynes H₅C₆‐C≡C‐SiMe₃ and H₅C₆‐C≡C‐CMe₃ – cis/trans Isomerisation and Substituent Exchange Phenyl‐trimethylsilylethyne, H₅C₆‐C≡C‐SiMe₃, reacted with different dialkylgallium hydrides, R₂Ga‐H (R = Me, Et, nPr, iPr, tBu), by the addition of one Ga‐H bond to its C≡C triple bond (hydrogallation). The gallium atoms attacked selectively those carbon atoms, which were also attached to trimethylsilyl groups. The cis arrangement of Ga and H across the resulting C=C double bonds resulted only for the sterically most shielded di(tert‐butyl)gallium derivative, while in all other cases spontaneous cis/trans rearrangement occurred with the quantitative formation of the trans addition products. The diethyl compound Et₂Ga‐C(SiMe₃)=C(H)‐C₆H₅ ( 2 ) gave by substituent exchange the secondary products EtGa[C(SiMe₃)=C(H)‐C₆H₅]₂ ( 7 , Z,Z) and Ga[C(SiMe₃)=C(H)‐C₆H₅]₃ ( 8 ). Interestingly, compound 8 has two alkenyl groups with a Z configuration, while the third C=C double bond has the cis arrangement of Ga and H (E configuration). The reversibility of the cis/trans isomerisation of hydrogallation products was observed for the first time. tert‐Butyl‐phenylethyne gave the simple addition product, R₂Ga(C₆H₅)=C(H)‐CMe₃ ( 9 ), only with di(n‐propyl)gallium hydride.     

The Reaction of 2‐X‐1, 2‐Difluoroalk‐1‐enyldifluoroboranes with Xenon Difluoride. A Methodical Approach to 1, 2‐Difluoroalk‐1‐enylxenon(II) Salts

2‐X‐1, 2‐Difluoroalk‐1‐enylxenon(II) salts were prepared by the reaction of XeF₂ with XCF=CFBF₂ (X = F, trans‐H, cis‐Cl, trans‐Cl, cis‐CF₃, cis‐C₂F₅) but no organoxenon(II) compounds were obtained when the trans‐isomers of boranes, trans‐XCF=CFBF₂ (X = CF₃, C₄F₉, C₄H₉, Et₃Si), were used under similar conditions.     

Polythiolated complexes. Part 2(1). Palladium(II) and platinum(II) derivatives of polyfluorophenylthiolates

Summary The preparation and characterization of the new thiolate complexes [M(SR)₂(SEt₂)₂] (M=Pt, R=C₆F₅ orp-C₆HF₄) and [M(SR)₂]_n (M=Pd, R=C₆F₅,p-C₆HF₄ orp-C₆H₄F; M=Pt, R=p-C₆H₄F) is discussed. The tendency to form polymeric, rather than monomeric species, varies as follows: Pd>Pt; C₆H₄F>C₆HF₄> C₆F₅. [Pt(SC₆F₅)₂(SEt₂)₂] has atrans square planar coordination.     

The Synthesis by Decarboxylation Reactions and Crystal Structures of 1, n–Bis(diphenylphosphino)alkane(pentafluorophenyl)‐platinum(II) Complexes

Decarboxylation reactions between the complexes cis–[PtCl₂L] (L = 1, n–bis(diphenylphosphino)–ethane (n = 2, dppe), –propane (n = 3, dppp) or –butane (n = 4, dppb)) and thallium(I) pentafluorobenzoate in pyridine give cis–[PtCl(C₆F₅)L] and cis–[Pt(C₆F₅)₂L] complexes in high yields with short reaction times. X–ray crystal structures of cis–[PtCl(C₆F₅)(dppe)] · 0.5 C₅H₅N, cis–[PtCl(C₆F₅)(dppp)], cis–[PtCl(C₆F₅)(dppb)] · C₃H₆O, cis–[Pt(C₆F₅)₂L] (L = dppe, dppp and dppb) and the reactants cis–[PtCl₂(dppp)] (as a CH₂Cl₂ solvate) and cis–[PtCl₂(dppb)] show monomeric structures with chelating diphosphine ligands in all cases rather than dimers with bridging diphosphines. ³¹P NMR data are consistent with these structures in solution.     

The unusual reactivity of C3F7OCFCF2 with PBu3 and the complex hydrides M[EH4] (M: Li, Na; E: B, Al); preparation of potassium perfluoro-2-propoxyeth-1-enyltrifluoroborate K[C3F7OCFCFBF3]

The nucleophilic hydrodefluorination of C₃F₇OCFCF₂ with the complex hydrides Li[AlH₄], Li[BH₄] or Na[BH₄] proceeded non-stereoselectively and was accompanied by the formation of either cis- and trans-C₃F₇OCHCFH and/or C₃F₇OCHFCF₂H. The reaction of C₃F₇OCFCF₂ with PBu₃ followed by treatment with BF₃·OMe₂ or BF₃·OEt₂ yielded [C₃F₇OCFCFPBu₃] [BF₄] (cis and trans) and, probably, [trans-Bu₃PCFCFPBu₃] [BF₄]₂. The hydrolysis of the latter with pure water proceeded quickly while the former isomeric mixture formed the isomeric olefins C₃F₇OCFCFH slowly. The usage of aqueous NaOH instead of water produced mainly trans-CHFCHF. The metallation of C₃F₇OCFCFH (cis:trans=45:55) to C₃F₇OCFCFLi and its subsequent reaction with B(OMe)₃ and K[HF₂] gave the salt K[C₃F₇OCFCFBF₃] in a different cis to trans ratio (25:75) with satisfactory yield.     

Further Evidence for ‘Extended’ Cumulene Complexes: Derivatives from Reactions with Halide Anions and Water

Reactions of [Ru{C=C(H)-1,4-C₆H₄C≡CH}(PPh₃)₂Cp]BF₄ ([ 1 a ]BF₄) with hydrohalic acids, HX, results in the formation of [Ru{C≡C-1,4-C₆H₄-C(X)=CH₂}(PPh₃)₂Cp] [X=Cl ( 2 a-Cl ), Br ( 2 a-Br )], arising from facile Markovnikov addition of halide anions to the putative quinoidal cumulene cation [Ru(=C=C=C₆H₄=C=CH₂)(PPh₃)₂Cp]⁺. Similarly, [M{C=C(H)-1,4-C₆H₄-C≡CH}(LL)Cp ]BF₄ [M(LL)Cp’=Ru(PPh₃)₂Cp ([ 1 a ]BF₄); Ru(dppe)Cp* ([ 1 b ]BF₄); Fe(dppe)Cp ([ 1 c ]BF₄); Fe(dppe)Cp* ([ 1 d ]BF₄)] react with H⁺/H₂O to give the acyl-functionalised phenylacetylide complexes [M{C≡C-1,4-C₆H₄-C(=O)CH₃}(LL)Cp’] ( 3 a – d ) after workup. The Markovnikov addition of the nucleophile to the remote alkyne in the cations [ 1 a–d ]⁺ is difficult to rationalise from the vinylidene form of the precursor and is much more satisfactorily explained from initial isomerisation to the quinoidal cumulene complexes [M(=C=C=C₆H₄=C=CH₂)(LL)Cp’]⁺ prior to attack at the more exposed, remote quaternary carbon. Thus, whilst representative acetylide complexes [Ru(C≡C-1,4-C₆H₄-C≡CH)(PPh₃)₂Cp] ( 4 a ) and [Ru(C≡C-1,4-C₆H₄-C≡CH)(dppe)Cp*] ( 4 b ) reacted with the relatively small electrophiles [CN]⁺ and [C₇H₇]⁺ at the β-carbon to give the expected vinylidene complexes, the bulky trityl ([CPh₃]⁺) electrophile reacted with [M(C≡C-1,4-C₆H₄-C≡CH)(LL)Cp’] [M(LL)Cp’=Ru(PPh₃)₂Cp ( 4 a ); Ru(dppe)Cp* ( 4 b ); Fe(dppe)Cp ( 4 c ); Fe(dppe)Cp* ( 4 d )] at the more exposed remote end of the carbon-rich ligand to give the putative quinoidal cumulene complexes [M{C=C=C₆H₄=C=C(H)CPh₃}(LL)Cp’]⁺, which were isolated as the water adducts [M{C≡C-1,4-C₆H₄-C(=O)CH₂CPh₃}(LL)Cp’] ( 6 a–d ). Evincing the scope of the formation of such extended cumulenes from ethynyl-substituted arylvinylene precursors, the rather reactive half-sandwich (5-ethynyl-2-thienyl)vinylidene complexes [M{C=C(H)-2,5-^cC₄H₂S-C≡CH}(LL)Cp’]BF₄ ([ 7 a – d ]BF₄ add water readily to give [M{C≡C-2,5-^cC₄H₂S-C(=O)CH₃}(LL)Cp’] ( 8 a – d )].     

Organo‐Palladium(II)‐Verbindungen mit PdC4‐Koordination: Phenylethinyl‐ und Methylphenylethinylkomplexe

Tetrakis(p‐tolyl)oxalamidinato‐bis[acetylacetonatopalladium(II)] ([Pd₂(acac)₂(oxam)]) reacted with Li–C≡C–C₆H₅ in THF with formation of [Pd(C≡C–C₆H₅)₄Li₂(thf)₄] ( 1a ). Reaction of [Pd₂(acac)₂(oxam)] with a mixture of 6 equiv. Li–C≡C–C₆H₅ and 2 equiv. LiCH₃ resulted in the formation of [Pd(CH₃)(C≡C–C₆H₅)₃Li₂(thf)₄] ( 2 ), and the dimeric complex [Pd₂(CH₃)₄(C≡C–C₆H₅)₄Li₄(thf)₆] ( 3 ) was isolated upon reaction of [Pd₂(acac)₂(oxam)] with a mixture of 4 equiv. Li–C≡C–C₆H₅ and 4 equiv. LiCH₃. 1 – 3 are extremely reactive compounds, which were isolated as white needles in good yields (60–90%). They were fully characterized by IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C‐, ⁷Li‐NMR spectroscopy, and by X‐ray crystallography of single crystals. In these compounds Li ions are bonded to the two carbon atoms of the alkinyl ligand. 1a reacted with Pd(PPh₃)₄ in the presence of oxygen to form the already known complexes trans‐[Pd(C≡C–C₆H₅)₂(PPh₃)₂] and [Pd(η²‐O₂)(PPh₃)₂]. In addition, 1a is an active catalyst for the Heck coupling reaction, but less active in the catalytic Sonogashira reaction.     

Bis(perfluoroorganyl)bromonium salts [(RF)2Br]Y (RF = aryl, alkenyl, and alkynyl)

Bromonium salts [(R_F)₂Br]Y with perfluorinated groups R_FC₆F₅, CF₃CFCF, C₂F₅CFCF, and CF₃C≡C were isolated from reactions of BrF₃ with R_FBF₂ in weakly coordinating solvents (wcs) like CF₃CH₂CHF₂ (PFP) or CF₃CH₂CF₂CH₃ (PFB) in 30-90% yields. C₆F₅BF₂ formed independent of the stoichiometry only [(C₆F₅)₂Br][BF₄]. 1:2 reactions of BrF₃ and silanes C₆F₅SiY₃ (Y = F, Me) ended with different products - C₆F₅BrF₂ or [(C₆F₅)₂Br][SiF₅] - as pure individuals, depending on Y and on the reaction temperature (Y = F). With C₆F₅SiF₃ at ≥−30 °C [(C₆F₅)₂Br][SiF₅] resulted in 92% yield whereas the reaction with less Lewis acidic C₆F₅SiMe₃ only led to C₆F₅BrF₂ (58%). The interaction of K[C₆F₅BF₃] with BrF₃ or [BrF₂][SbF₆] in anhydrous HF gave [(C₆F₅)₂Br][SbF₆]. Attempts to obtain a bis(perfluoroalkyl)bromonium salt by reactions of C₆F₁₃BF₂ with BrF₃ or of K[C₆F₁₃BF₃] with [BrF₂][SbF₆] failed. The 3:2 reactions of BrF₃ with (C₆F₅)₃B in CH₂Cl₂ gave [(C₆F₅)₂Br][(C₆F₅)_nBF_4−n] salts (n = 0-3). The mixture of anions could be converted to pure [BF₄]⁻ salts by treatment with BF₃·base.     

New types of asymmetrical bromonium salts [RF(RF′)Br]Y where RF and/or RF′ represent perfluorinated aryl, alkenyl, and alkynyl groups

A series of previously unknown asymmetrical fluorinated bis(aryl)bromonium, alkenyl(aryl)bromonium, and alkynyl(aryl)bromonium salts was prepared by reactions of C₆F₅BrF₂ or 4-CF₃C₆H₄BrF₂ with aryl group transfer reagents Ar′SiF₃ (Ar′ = C₆F₅, 4-FC₆H₄, C₆H₅) or perfluoroorganyl group transfer reagents R_F′BF₂ (R_F = C₆F₅, trans-CF₃CFCF, C₃F₇C≡C) preferentially in weakly coordinating solvents (CCl₃F, CCl₂FCClF₂, CH₂Cl₂, CF₃CH₂CHF₂ (PFP), CF₃CH₂CF₂CH₃ (PFB)). The presence of the base MeCN and the influence of the adducts R_F′BF₂·NCMe (R_F = C₆F₅, CF₃C≡C) on reactions aside to bromonium salt formation are discussed. Reactions of C₆F₅BrF₂ with Alk_F′BF₂ in PFP gave mainly C₆F₅Br and Alk_F′F (Alk_F′ = C₆F₁₃, C₆F₁₃CH₂CH₂), presumably, deriving from the unstable salts [C₆F₅(Alk_F′)Br]Y (Y = [Alk_F′BF₃]⁻). Prototypical reactivities of selected bromonium salts were investigated with the nucleophile I^-and the electrophile H⁺. [4-CF₃C₆H₄(C₆F₅)Br][BF₄] showed the conversion into 4-CF₃C₆H₄Br and C₆F₅I when reacted with [Bu₄N]I in MeCN. Perfluoroalkynylbromonium salts [C_nF_2n+1C≡C(R_F)Br][BF₄] slowly added HF when dissolved in aHF and formed [Z-C_nF_2n+1CFCH(R_F)Br][BF₄].     

trans‐Di­chloro­tetrakis(4‐methylpyrimidine‐N1)­ruthenium(II)

The title compound, trans‐[Ru^IICl₂(N¹‐mepym)₄] (mepym is 4‐methylpyrimidine, C₅H₆N₂), obtained from the reaction of trans,cis,cis‐[Ru^IICl₂(N¹‐mepym)₂(SbPh₃)₂] (Ph is phenyl) with excess mepym in ethanol, has fourfold crystallographic symmetry and has the four pyrimidine bases coordinated through N¹ and arranged in a propeller‐like orientation. The Ru—N and Ru—Cl bond distances are 2.082 (2) and 2.400 (4) Å, respectively. The methyl group, and the N³ and Cl atoms are involved in intermolecular C—H?N and C—­H?Cl hydrogen‐bond interactions.     

Strukturen von neuen Bis(pentafluorophenyl)halogenomercuraten [{Hg(C6F5)2}3(μ‐X)]— (X = Cl,Br, I)

Structures of New Bis(pentafluorophenyl)halogeno Mercurates [{Hg(C₆F₅)₂}₃(μ‐X)]^— (X = Cl, Br, I) From the reactions of [PNP]Cl or [PPh₄]Y (Y = Br, I) with Hg(C₆F₅)₂ crystals of the composition [Cat][{Hg(C₆F₅)₂}₃X] (Cat = PNP, X = Cl ( 1 ); Cat = PPh₄, X = Br ( 2 ), I ( 3 )) are formed. 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1¯, 2 and 3 crystallize isotypically in the monoclinic space group C2/c. In the crystals the halide anions are surrounded by three Hg(C₆F₅)₂ molecules. The reaction of [PPh₄]Br with Hg(C₆F₅)₂ under slightly changed conditions gives the compound [PPh₄]₂[{Hg(C₆F₅)₂}₃(μ‐Br)][{Hg(C₆F₅)₂}₂(μ‐Br)] ( 4 ).     

cis‐Dicarbonyl‐cis‐dichlorido‐trans‐bis(triphenylphosphine‐κP)iridium(III) tetrafluoridoborate,formed by reaction of (cycloocta‐1,5‐diene)bis(triphenylphosphine)iridium tetrafluoridoborate with carbonyl fluoride in dichloromethane solution

The reaction between carbonyl fluoride and [Ir(COD)(PPh₃)₂]BF₄ (COD is cycloocta‐1,5‐diene) in dichloromethane solution affords the novel title iridium salt, [IrCl₂(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂(CO)₂]BF₄. The cation lies across a twofold rotation axis in the space group P2₁2₁2 and its structure confirms the presence in a cis relationship of two metal‐bound chlorides, while the phosphine ligands occupy a trans pair of sites. The anion also lies across a twofold rotation axis, and the F atoms are disordered over two sets of sites.     

One‐dimensional structure of catena‐poly[tetra­ethyl­ammonium [tetra­cyano­iron(III)‐μ‐cyano‐[bis­(ethyl­ene­diamine)­cadmium(II)]‐μ‐cyano] tetra­hydrate]

The title compound, {(C₈H₂₀N)[CdFe(CN)₆(C₂H₈N₂)₂]·4H₂O}_n, was isolated from the aqueous system Cd²⁺/ethyl­ene­diamine (en)/[Fe(CN)₆]³⁻ in the presence of [Et₄N]Br. The crystal structure is dominated by a one‐dimensional motif, viz. a negatively charged 2,2‐CT (cis–trans) [–Cd(en)₂—NC—Fe(CN)₄—CN–]_nⁿ⁻ chain. The Cd and Fe atoms of the anion and the N atom of the cation all lie on twofold axes. The ethyl groups of the cation are equally disordered over two orientations. The cationic building block of the chain consists of a Cd^II atom coordinated by two chelating en ligands, and the distorted octa­hedral coordination is completed by two bridging cyano ligands in cis positions. The anionic building block is an [Fe(CN)₆]³⁻ anion in which the Fe^III atom is octa­hedrally coordinated by six cyano ligands; two of the cyano ligands, in trans positions, are bridging. The uncoordinated water mol­ecules link neighbouring chains through O—H⋯N and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.