Novel cyclohexyl‐based aminophosphine ligands and use of their Ru(II) complexes in transfer hydrogenation of ketones

Two new aminophosphines – furfuryl‐(N‐dicyclohexylphosphino)amine, [Cy₂PNHCH₂–C₄H₃O] ( 1 ) and thiophene‐(N‐dicyclohexylphosphino)amine, [Cy₂PNHCH₂–C₄H₃S] ( 2 ) – were prepared by the reaction of chlorodicyclohexylphosphine with furfurylamine and thiophene‐2‐methylamine. Reaction of the aminophosphines with [Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(μ‐Cl)Cl]₂ or [Ru(η⁶‐benzene)(μ‐Cl)Cl]₂ gave corresponding complexes [Ru(Cy₂PNHCH₂–C₄H₃O)(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Cl₂] ( 1a ), [Ru(Cy₂PNHCH₂–C₄H₃O)(η⁶‐benzene)Cl₂] ( 1b ), [Ru(Cy₂PNHCH₂–C₄H₃S)(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Cl₂] ( 2a ) and [Ru(Cy₂PNHCH₂–C₄H₃S)(η⁶‐benzene)Cl₂] ( 2b ), respectively, which are suitable catalyst precursors for the transfer hydrogenation of ketones. In particular, [Ru(Cy₂PNHCH₂–C₄H₃S)(η⁶‐benzene)Cl₂] acts as a good catalyst, giving the corresponding alcohols in 98–99% yield in 30 min at 82 °C (up to time of flight ≤ 588 h^?1). Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A μ‐chloro‐bridged dinuclear ruthenium complex with 9H‐carbazole: the formation of one‐dimensional linear chains of star‐shaped edge‐fused rings

The title complex, di‐μ‐chloro‐bis­[chloro­(η⁶‐p‐cymene)ruthenium(II)]–9H‐carbazole (1/2), [Ru₂Cl₄(C₁₀H₁₄)₂]·2C₁₂H₉N, is composed of one [RuCl₂(η⁶‐p‐cymene)]₂ and two 9H‐carbazole mol­ecules. There are one‐half of a dinuclear complex and one 9H‐carbazole mol­ecule per asymmetric unit. In the dinuclear complex, each of the two crystallographically equivalent Ru atoms is in a pseudo‐tetra­hedral environment, coordinated by a terminal Cl atom, two bridging Cl atoms and the aromatic hydro­carbon, which is linked in a η⁶ manner; the Ru⋯Ru separation is 3.688 (3) Å. The title complex has a crystallographic centre of symmetry located at the mid‐point of the Ru⋯Ru line. Inter­molecular N—H⋯Cl and π–π stacking inter­actions are observed. These inter­actions form a four‐pointed star‐shaped ring and one‐dimensional linear chains of edge‐fused rings running parallel to the [100] direction, which stabilize the crystal packing.     

Synthesis of Imines via Reactions of Benzyl Alcohol with Amines Using Half‐Sandwich (η6‐p‐cymene) Ruthenium(II) Complexes Stabilised by 2‐aminofluorene Derivatives

A new class of half‐sandwich (η⁶‐p‐cymene) ruthenium(II) complexes supported by 2‐aminofluorene derivatives [Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(Cl)(L)] ( L  = 2‐(((9H‐fluoren‐2‐yl)imino)methyl)phenol ( L ¹ ), 2‐(((9H‐fluoren‐2‐yl)imino)methyl)‐3‐methoxyphenol ( L ² ), 1‐(((9H‐fluoren‐2‐yl)imino)methyl)naphthalene‐2‐ol ( L ³ ) and N‐((1H‐pyrrol‐2‐yl)methylene)‐9H‐fluorene‐2‐amine ( L ⁴ )) were synthesized. All compounds were fully characterized by analytical and spectroscopic techniques (IR, UV–Vis, NMR) and also by mass spectrometry. The solid state molecular structures of the complexes [Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(Cl)(L²)], [Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(Cl)(L³)] and [Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(Cl)(L⁴)] revealed that the 2‐aminofluorene and p‐cymene moieties coordinate to ruthenium(II) in a three‐legged piano‐stool geometry. The synthesized complexes were used as catalysts for the dehydrogenative coupling of benzyl alcohol with a range of amines (aliphatic, aromatic and heterocyclic). The reactions were carried out under thermal heating, ultrasound and microwave assistance, using solvent or solvent free conditions, and the catalytic performance was optimized regarding the solvent, the type of base, the catalyst loading and the temperature. Moderately high to very high isolated yields were obtained using [Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(Cl)(L⁴)] at 1 mol%. In general, microwave irradiation produced better yields than the other two techniques irrespective of the nature of the substituents.     

A modular design of metal catalysts for the transfer hydrogenation of aromatic ketones

The ability of transition metal catalysts to add or remove hydrogen from organic substrates by transfer hydrogenation is a valuable synthetic tool. Towards a series of novel metal complexes with a P―NH ligand, [Ph₂PNHCH₂―C₄H₃O] derived from furfurylamine were synthesized. Reaction of [Ph₂PNHCH₂―C₄H₃O] 1 with [Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(μ‐Cl)Cl]₂, [Ru(η⁶‐benzene)(μ‐Cl)Cl]₂, [Rh(μ‐Cl)(cod)]₂ and [Ir(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(μ‐Cl)Cl]₂ gave a range of new monodentate complexes [Ru(Ph₂PNHCH₂―C₄H₃O)(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Cl₂] 2 , [Ru(Ph₂PNHCH₂―C₄H₃O)(η⁶‐benzene)Cl₂] 3 , [Rh(Ph₂PNHCH₂‐C₄H₃O)(cod)Cl] 4 , and [Ir(Ph₂PNHCH₂‐C₄H₃0)(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Cl₂] 5 , respectively. All new complexes were fully characterized by analytical and spectroscopic methods. ³¹P‐{¹H} NMR, distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer (DEPT) or ¹H‐¹³C heteronuclear correlation (HETCOR) experiments were used to confirm the spectral assignments. Following activation by KOH, compounds 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 catalyzed the transfer hydrogenation of acetophenone derivatives to 1‐phenylethanol derivatives in the presence of iso‐PrOH as the hydrogen source. Notably [Ru(Ph₂PNHCH₂‐C₄H₃O)(η⁶‐benzene)Cl₂] 3 acts as an excellent catalyst, giving the corresponding alcohols in 98–99% yield in 20 min at 82°C (time of flight ≤ 297 h^?1) for the transfer hydrogenation reaction in comparison to analogous rhodium or iridium complexes. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Selenoquinones Stabilized by Ruthenium(II) Arene Complexes: Synthesis,Structure, and Cytotoxicity

A new series of monoselenoquinone and diselenoquinone π complexes, [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Ru(η⁴‐C₆R₄SeE)] (R=H, E=Se ( 6 ); R=CH₃, E=Se ( 7 ); R=H, E=O ( 8 )), as well as selenolate π complexes [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Ru(η⁵‐C₆H₃R₂Se)][SbF₆] (R=H ( 9 ); R=CH₃ ( 10 )), stabilized by arene ruthenium moieties were prepared in good yields through nucleophilic substitution reactions from dichlorinated‐arene and hydroxymonochlorinated‐arene ruthenium complexes [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Ru(C₆R₄XCl)][SbF₆]₂ (R=H, X=Cl ( 1 ); R=CH₃, X=Cl ( 2 ); R=H, X=OH ( 3 )) as well as the monochlorinated π complexes [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Ru(η⁵‐C₆H₃R₂Cl)][SbF₆]₂ (R=H ( 4 ); R=CH₃ ( 5 )). The X‐ray crystallographic structures of two of the compounds, [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Ru(η⁴‐C₆Me₄Se₂)] ( 7 ) and [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Ru(η⁴‐C₆H₄SeO)] ( 8 ), were determined. The structures confirm the identity of the target compounds and ascertain the coordination mode of these unprecedented ruthenium π complexes of selenoquinones. Furthermore, these new compounds display relevant cytotoxic properties towards human ovarian cancer cells.     

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of the Tetrakis(methimazolyl)borates Li[Bmt4] and [Ru(p‐cymene)(Bmt4)][PF6]

The lithium tetrakis(methimazolyl)borate, Li[Bmt₄], is accessible from the reaction of Li[BH₄] with four equivalents of methimazole. The crystal structure of Li[Bmt₄] supported by four water molecules is described. Reaction of Li[Bmt₄] with [Ru(p‐cymene)Cl₂]₂ and subsequent treatment with NH₄PF₆ in CH₃CN results in the formation of the complex [Ru(p‐cymene)(Bmt₄)][PF₆]. In addition, we report the result of the X‐ray structure analysis of the chiral Ru complex [Ru(p‐cymene)(Bmt₄)][PF₆].     

Synthesis and Thermal Behaviour of Compounds in the System [Ph4P]Cl/BiCl3 and the Crystal Structures of [Ph4P]3[Bi2Cl9] · 2 CH2Cl2 and [Ph4P]2[Bi2Cl8] · 2 CH3COCH3

Six polynuclear chlorobismuthates are formed in the reaction between BiCl₃ and Ph₄PCl by variation of the molar ratio of the educts, the solvents and the crystallisation methods: [Ph₄P]₃[Bi₂Cl₉] · 2 CH₂Cl₂, [Ph₄P]₃[Bi₂Cl₉] · CH₃COCH₃, [Ph₄P]₂[Bi₂Cl₈] · 2 CH₃COCH₃, [Ph₄P]₄[Bi₄Cl₁₆] · 3 CH₃CN, [Ph₄P]₄[Bi₆Cl₂₂], and [Ph₄P]₄[Bi₈Cl₂₈]. We report the crystal structure of [Ph₄P]₃[Bi₂Cl₉] · 2 CH₂Cl₂ which crystallises with triclinic symmetry in the S. G. P1 No. 2, with the lattice parameters a = 13.080(3) Å, b = 14.369(3) Å, c = 21.397(4) Å, α = 96.83(1)°, β = 95.96(1)°, γ = 95.94(2)°, V = 3943.9(1) ų, Z = 2. The anion is formed from two face‐sharing BiCl₆‐octahedra. [Ph₄P]₂[Bi₂Cl₈] · 2 CH₃COCH₃ crystallises with monoclinic symmetry in the S. G. P2₁/n, No. 14, with the lattice parameters a = 14.045(5) Å, b = 12.921(4) Å, c = 17.098(3) Å, β = 111.10(2)°, V = 2894.8(2) ų, Z = 2. The anion is a bi‐octahedron of two square‐pyramids, joined by a common edge. The octahedral coordination is achieved with two acetone ligands. [Ph₄P]₄[Bi₄Cl₁₆] · 3 CH₃CN crystallises in the triclinic S. G., P1, No. 2, with the lattice parameters a = 14.245(9) Å, b = 17.318(6) Å, c = 24.475(8) Å, α = 104.66(3)°, β = 95.93(3)°, γ = 106.90(4)°, V = 5486(4) ų, Z = 2. Two Bi₂Cl₈ dimers in syn‐position form the cubic anion. Lattice parameters of [Ph₄P]₃[Bi₂Cl₉] · CH₃COCH₃ are also given. The solvated compounds are desolvated at approximately 100 °C. [Ph₄P]₃[Bi₂Cl₉] · 2 CH₂Cl₂ and [Ph₄P]₃[Bi₂Cl₉] · CH₃COCH₃ show the same sequence of phase transitions after desolvation. All compounds melt into a liquid in which some order is observed and transform on cooling into the glassy state.     

Ru‐Catalyzed Branched versus Linear Selective C3‐Alkylation of 2‐Aroylbenzofurans with Acrylates via CH Activation

The carbonyl‐directed C3?H activation and alkylation of 2‐aroylbenzo[b]furans with acrylates occurs selectively either in a linear or branched fashion, depending on the catalyst employed; [Ru(p‐cymene)Cl₂]₂ or Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂, respectively. Two alternate pathways—funded upon the differences in steric and electronic preferences of these two complexes—is proposed for the selectivity of linear versus branched products.     

Synthese und Struktur von Ruthenium(II)‐Komplexen mit Triazenido‐ und Pentaazadienido‐Liganden

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Ruthenium(II) Complexes with Triazenido and Pentaazadienido Ligands The ruthenium(II) triazenido complex [RuCl(ClC₆H₄N₃C₆H₄Cl)(p‐cymene)] ( 1 ) is obtained by the reaction of silver bis(p‐chlorphenyl)triazenid with [RuCl₂(p‐cymene)]₂ in CH₂Cl₂, and forms air stable, orange yellow crystals. It crystallizes as 1 ·CH₂Cl₂ in the orthorhombic space group Pbca with the lattice parameters a = 3134.3(3), b = 2105.7(2), c = 769.15(4) pm and Z = 8. In the diamagnetic mononuclear complex 1 the chelating triazenido ligand coordinates with the atoms N(1) and N(3). p‐Cymene binds η⁶ with its C₆ ring. The reaction of the etherphosphane complex [RuCl₂(Ph₂PCH₂C₄H₇O₂)₂] with 1, 3‐bis(p‐tolyl)triazenid in THF yields the complex [RuCl(tolyl‐N₃‐tolyl)(Ph₂PCH₂C₄H₇O₂)₂] ( 2 ). 2 forms monoclinic, red crystals with the space group P2₁/c and a = 1521.0(2), b = 1451.8(2), c = 2073.7(2) pm, β = 99.29(1)° and Z = 4. It is air stable and diamagnetic. The triazenide ion coordinates with the atoms N(1) and N(3). One of the two etherphosphane ligands is chelating and coordinates with the P atom and one O atom, while the other ligand binds in a monodentate fashion with its P atom, resulting in a coordination number of six for the Ru^II. [Ag(tolyl‐N₅‐tolyl)]₂ reacts in THF with [RuCl₂(C₆H₆)]₂ to afford the air stable, diamagnetic pentaazadienido complex [RuCl(tolyl‐N₅‐tolyl)(C₆H₆)] ( 3 ). 3 forms monoclinic, red crystals with the space group P2₁/c and a = 1462.4(1), b = 1056.51(8), c = 1371.4(1) pm, β = 114.36(1)° and Z = 4. The chelating pentaazadienido ligand coordinates with the atoms N(1) and N(3) at the divalent Ru atom. The benzene molecule binds η⁶ with its π system.     

Chloro(η6‐p‐cymene)(phosphoramidite)ruthenium(II), a 16‐Electron Fragment Stabilized by an η2‐Aryl–Metal Interaction,and Its Use in Asymmetric Cyclopropanation

Chloride abstraction from the half‐sandwich complexes [RuCl₂(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(P*‐κP)] ( 2a : P* = (S_a,R,R)‐ 1a = (1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl bis[(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl)]phosphoramidite; 2b : P* = (S_a,R,R)‐ 1b = (1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl bis[(1R)‐(1‐(1‐naphthalen‐1‐yl)ethyl]phosphoramidite) with (Et₃O)[PF₆] or Tl[PF₆] gives the cationic, 18‐electron complexes dichloro(η⁶‐p‐cymene){(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl {(1R)‐1‐[(1,2‐η)‐phenyl]ethyl}[(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP}ruthenium(II) hexafluorophosphate ( 3a ) and [Ru(S)]‐dichloro(η⁶‐p‐cymene){(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl {(1R)‐1‐[(1,2‐η)‐naphthalen‐1‐yl]ethyl}[(1R)‐1‐(naphthalen‐1‐yl)ethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP)ruthenium(II) hexafluorophosphate ( 3b ), which feature the η²‐coordination of one aryl substituent of the phosphoramidite ligand, as indicated by ¹H‐, ¹³C‐, and ³¹P‐NMR spectroscopy and confirmed by an X‐ray study of 3b . Additionally, the dissociation of p‐cymene from 2a and 3a gives dichloro{(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl [(1R)‐(1‐(η⁶‐phenyl)ethyl][(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP)ruthenium(II) ( 4a ) and di‐μ‐chlorobis{(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl [(1R)‐1‐(η⁶‐phenyl)ethyl][(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP}diruthenium(II) bis(hexafluorophosphate) ( 5a ), respectively, in which one phenyl group of the N‐substituents is η⁶‐coordinated to the Ru‐center. Complexes 3a and 3b catalyze the asymmetric cyclopropanation of α‐methylstyrene with ethyl diazoacetate with up to 86 and 87% ee for the cis‐ and the trans‐isomers, respectively.     

Nucleophilic Aromatic Addition Reactions of the Metallabenzenes and Metallapyridinium: Attacking Aromatic Metallacycles with Bis(diphenylphosphino)methane to Form Metallacyclohexadienes and Cyclic η2‐Allene‐Coordinated Complexes

The reactions of phosphonium‐substituted metallabenzenes and metallapyridinium with bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (DPPM) were investigated. Treatment of [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl₂(PPh₃)₂]Cl with DPPM produced osmabenzenes [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl₂{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}]Cl ( 2 ), [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl₂ ( 3 ), and cyclic osmium η²‐allene complex [Os{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?(η²‐C?CH)}Cl₂{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl ( 4 ). When the analogue complex of osmabenzene 1 , ruthenabenzene [Ru{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl₂(PPh₃)₂]Cl, was used, the reaction produced ruthenacyclohexadiene [Ru{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?C(PPh₃)CH}Cl{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl₂ ( 6 ), which could be viewed as a Jackson–Meisenheimer complex. Complex 6 is unstable in solution and can easily be convert to the cyclic ruthenium η²‐allene complexes [Ru{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?(η²‐C?CH)}Cl{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl₂ ( 7 ) and [Ru{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?(η²‐C?CH)}Cl₂{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl ( 8 ). The key intermediates of the reactions have been isolated and fully characterized, further supporting the proposed mechanism for the reactions. Similar reactions also occurred in phosphonium‐substituted metallapyridinium [OsCl₂{NHC(CH₃)C(Ph)C(PPh₃)CH}(PPh₃)₂]BF₄ to give the cyclic osmium η²‐allene‐imine complex [OsCl₂{NH?C(CH₃)C(Ph)?(η²‐C?CH)}{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}(PPh₃)]BF₄ ( 11 ).     

[Ph2P(O)CH2Im][F3B(μ‐OH)BF3]. Erste strukturanalytische Charakterisierung des Hexafluoro(μ‐hydroxo)diborat‐Ions [1]

[Ph₂P(O)CH₂Im][F₃B(μ‐OH)BF₃]. First Structural Characterization of the Hexafluoro(μ‐hydroxo)diborate Ion [1] The hexafluoro(μ‐hydroxo)diborate ion has been isolated as it's Ph₂P(O)CH₂Im salt [Im = 2‐(1, 3, 4, 5‐tetramethylimidazolio)] ( 2 ) through basic hydrolysis of [Ph₂P(OBF₃)CH₂Im]BF₄ ( 1 ). The crystal structure of 2 · CH₂Cl₂ reveals the presence of ion pairs linked by unsymmetrical O‐H‐O hydrogen bonds.     

N‐Methylimidazolkomplexe des Berylliums: [Be(Me‐Im)4]I2 und [Be3(μ‐OH)3(Me‐Im)6]Cl3

Tetra(N‐methylimidazole)‐beryllium‐di‐iodide, [Be(Me‐Im)₄]I₂ ( 1 ), was prepared from beryllium powder and iodine in N‐methylimidazole suspension to give yellow single crystal plates, which were characterized by X‐ray diffraction and IR spectroscopy. Compound 1 crystallizes tetragonally in the space group I 2d with four formula units per unit cell. Lattice dimensions at 100(2) K: a = b = 1784.9(1), c = 696.2(1) pm, R₁ = 0.0238. The structure consists of homoleptic dications [Be(Me‐Im)₄]²⁺ with short Be–N distances of 170.3(3) pm and iodide ions with weak interionic C–H ··· I contacts. Experiments to yield crystalline products from reactions of N‐methylimidazole with BeCl₂ and (Ph₄P)₂[Be₂Cl₆], respectively, in dichloromethane solutions were unsuccessful. However, single crystals of [Be₃(μ‐OH)₃(Me‐Im)₆]Cl₃ ( 2 ) were obtained from these solutions in the presence of moisture air. According to X‐ray diffraction studies, two different crystal individuals ( 2a and 2b ) result, depending on the starting materials BeCl₂ and (Ph₄P)₂[Be₂Cl₆], respectively [ 2a : Space group P2₁/n, Z = 4; 2b : Space group P , Z = 2]. As a side‐product from the reaction of N‐methylimidazole with (Ph₄P)₂[Be₂Cl₆] single crystals of (Ph₄P)Cl·CH₂Cl₂ ( 3 ) were identified crystallographically (P2₁/n, Z = 4) which are isotypical with the corresponding known bromide (Ph₄P)Br·CH₂Cl₂.     

Chloro(η6‐p‐cymene)(2‐methyl‐5‐oxo‐7‐phenyl‐5,6‐di­hydro‐2H‐1,2,4‐triaz­epine‐3‐thiol­ato‐κ2N4,S)­ruthenium(II)

The novel title ruthenium(II) complex, [RuCl(C₁₀H₁₄)(C₁₀H₁₀N₃OS)], was synthesized from the reaction of 1,2,4‐triazepine, a new class of bidentate ligands, with [Ru(p‐cymene)Cl₂]₂. The 1,2,4‐triazepine ligand is coordinated to the metal centre through the N‐4 and S atoms, forming a four‐membered chelate ring. This is the first structural example of a transition metal complex containing a 1,2,4‐triazepine ligand.     

7‐{Di­phenyl­[(tri­phenyl­phos­phine)­aurio]­phos­phine(1+)‐P}‐8‐methyl‐7,8‐dicarba‐nido‐undecaborate(1–) dichloro­methane hemi­solvate

The title compound, 7‐[(Ph₂P)Au(PPh₃)]‐8‐(CH₃)‐7,8‐nido‐C₂B₉H₁₀]·­0.5CH₂Cl₂ or [Au(C₁₅H₂₃B₉P)­(C₁₈H₁₅P)]·­0.5CH₂Cl₂, is the first reported gold derivative of the ligand [7‐­(Ph₂P)‐8‐(CH₃)‐7,8‐nido‐C₂B₉H₁₀]^?. It has a mono­nuclear structure with the gold centre in an essentially linear coordination [P—Au—P 174.041 (15)°]. The open C₂B₃ face contains one H atom that is strongly bonded to the central B atom and semi‐bridging to a neighbouring B atom [B—H distances 1.070 (16) and 1.45 (3) Å].     

Synthesis and Cytotoxicity of Arene‐Ru Compounds Containing 4‐Nitroaniline or 2‐Halogenated 4‐Nitroaniline

The compounds [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)RuCl₂(4‐nitroaniline)] and [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)RuCl₂(2‐halogen‐4‐nitroaniline)] were synthesized and characterized by various means. The [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)RuCl₂(4‐nitroaniline)] and [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)RuCl₂(2‐fluoro‐4‐nitroaniline)] compounds were determined by X‐ray diffraction, appearing in a distorted piano‐stool type of arrangement with similar bond lengths and angles around the ruthenium. The compounds exhibited moderate to strong in vitro cytotoxicity against A549 and MCF‐7 human cancer cells. Substitution of heavy halogen atom on the ortho position of para‐nitroaniline weakened the cytotoxicity against both of MCF‐7 and A549, except the cases of fluorine substitution for hydrogen atom regarding A549 and bromine substitution for chlorine atom regarding MCF‐7, which showed minor deviation.     

Thiosemicarbazonates of Ruthenium(II): Crystal Structures of [Bis(triphenylphosphine)][bis(N‐phenyl‐pyridine‐2‐carbaldehyde Thiosemicarbazonato)]ruthenium(II) and [Bis(diphenylphosphino)butane][bis(salicylaldehyde Thiosemicarbazonato)]ruthenium(II)

Reaction of RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃ with N‐Phenyl‐pyridine‐2‐carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (C₅H₄N–C²(H)=N³‐N²H–C¹(=S)N¹HC₆H₅, Hpytsc‐NPh) in presence of Et₃N base led to loss of ‐N²H‐proton and yielded the complex [Ru(pytsc‐NPh)₂(Ph₃P)₂] ( 1 ). Similar reactions of precursor RuCl₂[(p‐tolyl)₃P]₃ with a series of thiosemicarbazone ligands, viz. pyridine‐2‐carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (Hpytsc), salicylaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (H₂stsc), and benzaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (Hbtsc), have yielded the complexes, [Ru(pytsc)₂{(p‐tolyl)₃P}₂] ( 2 ), [Ru(Hstsc)₂{(p‐tolyl)₃P}]₂ ( 3 ), and [Ru(btsc)₂{(p‐tolyl)₃P}₂] ( 4 ), respectively. The reactions of precursor Ru₂Cl₄(dppb)₃ {dppb = Ph₂P–(CH₂)₄–PPh₂} with H₂stsc, Hbtsc, furan‐2‐carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (Hftsc) and thiophene‐2‐carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (Httsc) have formed complexes of the composition, [Ru(Hstsc)₂(dppb)] ( 5 ), [Ru(btsc)₂(dppb)] ( 6 ), [Ru(ftsc)₂(dppb)] ( 7 ), and [Ru(ttsc)₂(dppb)] ( 8 ). The complexes have been characterized by analytical data, IR, NMR (¹H, ³¹P) spectroscopy and X‐ray crystallography ( 1 and 5 ). The proton NMR confirmed loss of –N²H– proton in all the compounds, and ³¹P NMR spectra reveal the presence of equivalent phosphorus atoms in the complexes. In all the compounds, thiosemicarbazone ligands coordinate to the Ru^II atom via hydrazinic nitrogen (N²) and sulfur atoms. The arrangement around each metal atom is distorted octahedral with cis:cis:trans P, P:N, N:S, S dispositions of donor atoms.     

Zur Strukturchemie der Alkyl- und Arylhalogenoarsenate(III), [Me2As2Cl5]–, [RAsCl3]–, [R2As2Br6]2– (R = Me,Et, Ph) und [Ph2AsX2]– (X = Cl,Br)

Structural Chemistry of the Alkyl- and Arylhaloarsenates(III) [Me₂As₂Cl₅]^–, [RAsCl₃]^–, [R₂As₂Br₆]^2– (R = Me, Et, Ph) and [Ph₂AsX₂]^– (X = Cl, Br) The alkyl- and arylhaloarsenates(III) [Ph₄P][Me₂As₂Cl₅] ( 1 ), [Ph₄P][RAsCl₃] (R = Me, Et, Ph, 2 – 4 ), [Me₃PhN][PhAsCl₃] ( 5 ), [Ph₄P]₂[R₂As₂Br₆] (R = Me, Et, Ph, 6 – 8 ), [n-Pr₄N][Ph₂AsCl₂] ( 9 ) and [n-Bu₄N][Ph₂AsBr₂] ( 10 ) have been prepared and their structures established by X-ray diffraction. In contrast to the chloroarsenates(III) 2 – 5 , which all contain isolated ψ-trigonal bipyramidal anions [RAsCl₃]^–, the analogous bromoarsenates(III) 6 – 8 exhibit dimeric structures. Whereas the trans sited As–Cl distances in 2 and 3 are very similar a pronounced degree of asymmetry is apparent for the Cl–As–Cl three-centre bonds in 4 and 5 [2.396(1) and 2.602(1) Å in 5]. In 6 and 7 C_i symmetry related RAsBr₂ units are connected through long As…Br bonds [2.926(1) and 3.116(2) Å in 6 ]. The bromophenylarsenate(III) anion of 8 which contains two effectively undistorted ψ-trigonal bipyramids [PhAsBr₃]^– associated by weak As…Br interactions [3.117(2) Å]. In view of its very long bridging As…Cl distances the [Me₂As₂Cl₅]^– anion in 1 can, as 6 an 7 , be regarded as two MeAsCl₂ molecules weakly linked through a chloride ion.     

Redox‐Switchable Ring‐Closing Metathesis: Catalyst Design,Synthesis, and Study

High yielding syntheses of 1‐(ferrocenylmethyl)‐3‐mesitylimidazolium iodide ( 1 ) and 1‐(ferrocenylmethyl)‐3‐mesitylimidazol‐2‐ylidene ( 2 ) were developed. Complexation of 2 to [{Ir(cod)Cl}₂] (cod=cis,cis‐1,5‐cyclooctadiene) or [Ru(PCy₃)Cl₂(?CH‐o‐O‐iPrC₆H₄)] (Cy=cyclohexyl) afforded 3 ([Ir( 2 )(cod)Cl]) and 5 ([Ru( 2 )Cl₂(?CH‐o‐O‐iPrC₆H₄)]), respectively. Complex 4 ([Ir( 2 )(CO)₂Cl]) was obtained by bubbling carbon monoxide through a solution of 3 in CH₂Cl₂. Spectroelectrochemical IR analysis of 4 revealed that the oxidation of the ferrocene moiety in 2 significantly reduced the electron‐donating ability of the N‐heterocyclic carbene ligand (ΔTEP=9 cm^?1; TEP=Tolman electronic parameter). The oxidation of 5 with [Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄COMe)Cp][BF₄] as well as the subsequent reduction of the corresponding product [ 5 ][BF₄] with decamethylferrocene (Fc*) each proceeded in greater than 95 % yield. Mössbauer, UV/Vis and EPR spectroscopy analysis confirmed that [ 5 ][BF₄] contained a ferrocenium species, indicating that the iron center was selectively oxidized over the ruthenium center. Complexes 5 and [ 5 ][BF₄] were found to catalyze the ring‐closing metathesis (RCM) of diethyl diallylmalonate with observed pseudo‐first‐order rate constants (k_obs) of 3.1×10^?4 and 1.2×10^?5 s^?1, respectively. By adding suitable oxidants or reductants over the course of a RCM reaction, complex 5 was switched between different states of catalytic activity. A second‐generation N‐heterocyclic carbene that featured a 1′,2′,3′,4′,5′‐ pentamethylferrocenyl moiety ( 10 ) was also prepared and metal complexes containing this ligand were found to undergo iron‐centered oxidations at lower potentials than analogous complexes supported by 2 (0.30–0.36 V vs. 0.56–0.62 V, respectively). Redox switching experiments using [Ru( 10 )Cl₂(?CH‐o‐O‐iPrC₆H₄)] revealed that greater than 94 % of the initial catalytic activity was restored after an oxidation–reduction cycle.     

Mononuclear Complexes of Platinum Group Metals Containing η6‐ and η5‐Cyclic Π‐Perimeter Hydrocarbon and Pyridylpyrazolyl Derivatives: Syntheses and Structural Studies

Piano‐stool‐shaped platinum group metal compounds, stable in the solid state and in solution, which are based on 2‐(5‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine ( L ) with the formulas [(η⁶‐arene)Ru( L )Cl]PF₆ {arene = C₆H₆ ( 1 ), p‐cymene ( 2 ), and C₆Me₆, ( 3 )}, [(η⁶‐C₅Me₅)M( L )Cl]PF₆ {M = Rh ( 4 ), Ir ( 5 )}, and [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Ru(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 6 ), [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Os(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 7 ), [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 8 ), and [(η⁵‐C₉H₇)Ru(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 9 ) were prepared by a general method and characterized by NMR and IR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The molecular structures of compounds 4 and 5 were established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In each compound the metal is connected to N1 and N11 in a k² manner.