Lithium‐ und Caesium‐Alkoxometallate

Lithium and Cesium Alkoxometalates The aluminium alkoxide, Al(OCH₂Ph)₃ ( 1 ), can be obtained from a direct synthesis of Al and PhCH₂OH under HgCl₂ catalysis. The formation of the metalate [{(Diglyme)Li}{Al(O^tBu)₄}] ( 2 ) from LiAlH₄ and ^tBuOH in THF under evolution of hydrogen takes place, if the reaction product is heated under reflux with additional ^tBuOH in diglyme. The nucleophilic attack of F^– ions leads during the treatment of CsF on a THF solution of Al(O^cHex)₃ after ligand redistribution to the coordination polymer [{Cs(THF)₂}{Cs(THF)}{Al(O^cHex)₄}₂]_n ([3]_n). 1 , 2 , and 3 were characterized by NMR, IR and MS techniques as well as by crystal structure analyses. According to them 1 is present as tetramer in solution and the solid state. The central structural motif of the metalate 2 is a heteronuclear and planar LiO₂Al four‐membered ring with a penta‐coordinated Li⁺ ion. In the chainlike coordination polymer [ 3 ]_n Cs⁺ ions with coordination number five and six occupy alternating positions.     

Facile synthesis of zwitterionic organoaluminum complexes containing formally dianionic homoscorpionate ligands

A series of zwitterionic aluminum complexes of the type AlX[(2‐O‐3,5‐tBu₂C₆H₂)₃PZ] (AlX [O₃PZ]; X = Cl, Me, Et, and iBu; Z = H, Me) containing C₃‐symmetric, formally dianionic, facially tridentate ligands [O₃PZ]^2? were prepared and structurally characterized. Although serendipitous, these complexes can be readily synthesized by partial protonolysis of AlX₃ with equal molar (2‐HO‐3,5‐tBu₂C₆H₂)₃P (H₃[O₃P]) or [(2‐HO‐3,5‐tBu₂C₆H₂)₃p.m.e](OTf) ({H₃[O₃PMe]}OTf) in THF at 25°C or elevated temperatures. Alcoholysis of AlMe[O₃PMe] ( 2 ) with an excess amount of MeOH in refluxing toluene generates AlOMe[O₃PMe] ( 10 ). Salt metathesis of AlCl[O₃PMe] ( 6 ) with nBuM (M = Li, MgCl) and NaOR (R = tBu, Ph) in ethereal solutions affords AlnBu[O₃PMe] ( 9 ) and AlOR[O₃PMe] (R = tBu ( 11 ), Ph ( 12 )), respectively. Reactivity of 10 , 11 , and 12 with respect to catalytic ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone is assessed.     

Zirconium Complexes of Two Different Iminopyrrolyl Ligands – Syntheses and Structures

The reaction involving N‐aryliminopyrrolyl ligand, 2‐((p‐Me‐C₆H₃N=CMe)–C₄H₃NH) ( 1a ) (Imp^Me‐H), and Zr(OtBu)₄ in a 2:1 molar ratio in toluene at 90 °C afforded the corresponding bis(iminopyrrolyl) complex of zirconium, [(Imp^Me)₂Zr(OtBu)₂] ( 2a ) having two bidentate iminopyrrole groups in the coordination sphere. In contrast, the bulkier 2‐((2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃N=CH)–C₄H₃NH) ( 1b ) (Imp^Dipp‐H) and Zr(OtBu)₄ in a 1:1 molar ratio under the same condition yielded the corresponding mono(iminopyrrolyl) complex of zirconium, [(Imp^Dipp)Zr(OtBu)₃(THF)] ( 2b ), which contains only one bidentate iminopyrrole moiety in the coordination sphere. Both complexes were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. The solid‐state structures reveal that the bulky iminopyrrole ligands cause a steric crowding around the zirconium ion along with three tert‐butoxide ligands attached to the central metal atom.     

Molecular structures and supramolecular association of chlorodiorganotin(IV) complexes with bis- and tris-dithiocarbamate ligand

Two series of di and trinuclear chlorodiorganotin(IV) complexes derived from bis- and tris-dithiocarbamate ligands have been prepared and structurally characterized. The dinuclear complexes 1-2 of the composition {(R₂SnCl)₂(bis-dtc)} (1, R = Me; 2, R = ⁿBu) have been obtained from R₂SnCl₂ (R = Me, ⁿBu) and the triethylammonium salt of N,N′-dibenzyl-1,2-ethylene-bis(dithiocarbamate). The trinuclear complexes 3-9 with the general formula {(R₂SnCl)₃(tris-dtc)} 3, R = Me, tris-dtc = tris-dtc-Me; 4, R = Me, tris-dtc = tris-dtc-ⁱPr; 5, R = Me, tris-dtc = tris-dtc-Bn; 6, R = ⁿBu, tris-dtc = tris-dtc-Me; 7, R = ⁿBu, tris-dtc = tris-dtc- ⁱPr; 8, R = ⁿBu, tris-dtc = tris-dtc-Bn; 9, R = ^tBu, tris-dtc = tris-dtc-Me) were prepared from R₂SnCl₂ (R = Me, ⁿBu, ^tBu) and the potassium dithiocarbamate salts of (tris[2-(methylamino)ethyl]amine) (tris-dtc-Me), (tris[2-(isopropylamino)ethyl]amine) (=tris-dtc-ⁱPr) and (tris[2-(benzylamino)ethyl]amine) (=tris-dtc-Bn). Compounds 1-9 have been analyzed as far as possible by elemental analysis, FAB⁺ mass spectrometry, IR and NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ¹¹⁹Sn) spectroscopy, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The solid state and solution studies showed that the dtc ligands are coordinated to the tin atoms in the anisobidentate manner. In all cases the metal centers are five-coordinate. The coordination geometry is intermediate between square-pyramidal and trigonal-bipyramidal coordination polyhedra with τ-values in the range of 0.32-0.53. For the members of each series characterized in the solid state by X-ray diffraction analysis, different molecular conformations were found. The crystal structures show the presence of C-H?Cl, C-H?S, C-H?π, S?Cl, S?S, Cl?Sn and S?Sn contacts.     

Preparation and Characterization of Aluminum Alkoxides and their Application to Ring‐Opening Polymerization of ϵ‐Caprolactones

The reaction of 2‐methoxybenzyl alcohol with one molar equiv of R₂AIX in diethyl ether at 0°C gives [(2‐MeOC₆H₄CH₂‐μ‐O)AlRX]₂ ( 1 : R = Et, X = Cl, 2 : R = X = Et). In addition, 2,4‐di‐tert‐butylphenol reacts with ⁱBu₃Al affording a four‐coordinated aluminum compound [(μ‐2,4‐^tBu₂‐C₆H₄O)Al(ⁱBu)₂]₂ ( 4 ). Single crystal X‐ray structure analysis of 4 shows a C_2h‐symmetry with a planar Al₂O₂ core. Ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) of caprolactones initiated by 1, 4 and [(μ‐OCH₂C₆H₄OMe)Al(ⁱBu)₂]₂ ( 3 ) is performed and polyesters with narrow molecular weight distributions were obtained from the “living” ROP of caprolactones. ¹H NMR spectroscopic studies of PCL reveal that the initiator of 1 and 3 is through the Al‐OAr function, but the initiator of 4 is through the Al‐ ⁱBu group.     

The Synthesis of (η3‐C3H5)Pd{Si[N(tBu)CH]2}Cl and the Catalytic Property for Heck Reaction

Treatment of N‐heterocyclic silylene Si[N(^tBu)CH]₂ ( 1 ) and [(η³‐C₃H₅)PdCl]₂ in toluene led to the formation of the mononuclear complex (η³‐C₃H₅)Pd{Si[N(^tBu)CH]₂}Cl ( 3 ), the silicon analogue to N‐heterocyclic carbene complex (η³‐C₃H₅)Pd{C[N(^tBu)CH]₂}Cl ( 2 ). Complex 3 was characterized with ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR. Investigation shows that (η³‐C₃H₅)Pd{Si[N(^tBu)CH]₂}Cl is an active catalyst for Heck coupling reaction of styrene with aryl bromides.     

Insights into the Intramolecular Donor Stabilisation of Organostannylene Palladium and Platinum Complexes: Syntheses,Structures and DFT Calculations

The syntheses of the transition metal complexes cis‐[(4‐tBu‐2,6‐{P(O)(OiPr)₂}₂C₆H₂SnCl)₂MX₂] ( 1 , M=Pd, X=Cl; 2 , M=Pd, X=Br; 3 , M=Pd, X=I; 4 , M=Pt, X=Cl), cis‐[{2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃SnCl}₂MX₂] ( 5 , M=Pd, X=I; 6 , M=Pt, X=Cl), trans‐[{2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃SnI}₂PtI₂] ( 7 ) and trans‐[(4‐tBu‐2,6‐{P(O)(OiPr)₂}₂ C₆H₂SnCl)PdI₂]₂ ( 8 ) are reported. Also reported is the serendipitous formation of the unprecedented complexes trans‐[(4‐tBu‐2,6‐{P(O)(OiPr)₂}₂C₆H₂SnCl)₂ Pt(SnCl₃)₂] ( 10 ) and [(4‐tBu‐2,6‐{P(O) (OiPr)₂}₂C₆H₂SnCl)₃Pt(SnCl₃)₂] ( 11 ). The compounds were characterised by elemental analyses, ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P, ¹¹⁹Sn and ¹⁹⁵Pt NMR spectroscopy, single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis, UV/Vis spectroscopy and, in the cases of compounds 1 , 3 and 4 , also by Mössbauer spectroscopy. All the compounds show the tin atoms in a distorted trigonal‐bipyramidal environment. The Mössbauer spectra suggest the tin atoms to be present in the oxidation state III. The kinetic lability of the complexes was studied by redistribution reactions between compounds 1 and 3 as well as between 1 and cis‐[{2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃SnCl}₂PdCl₂]. DFT calculations provided insights into both the bonding situation of the compounds and the energy difference between the cis and trans isomers. The latter is influenced by the donor strength of the pincer‐type ligands.     

Structure‐Directing Forces in Intercluster Compounds of Cationic [Ag14(CCtBu)12Cl]+ Building Blocks and Polyoxometalates: Long‐Range versus Short‐Range Bonding Interactions

Crystallization of [Ag₁₄(C?CtBu)₁₂Cl][BF₄] and different polyoxometalates in organic solvents yields a series of new intercluster compounds: [Ag₁₄(C?CtBu)₁₂Cl(CH₃CN)]₂[W₆O₁₉] ( 1 ), (nBu₄N)[Ag₁₄(C?CtBu)₁₂Cl(CH₃CN)]₂[PW₁₂O₄₀] ( 2 ), and [Ag₁₄(C?CtBu)₁₂Cl]₂[Ag₁₄(C?CtBu)₁₂Cl(CH₃CN)]₂[SiMo₁₂O₄₀] ( 3 ). Applying the same technique to a system starting from polymeric {[Ag₃(C?CtBu)₂][BF₄]?0.6 H₂O}_n and the polyoxometalate (nBu₄N)₂[W₆O₁₉] results in the formation of [Ag₁₄(C?CtBu)₁₂(CH₃CN)₂][W₆O₁₉] ( 4 ). Here, the Ag₁₄ cluster is generated from polymeric {[Ag₃(C?CtBu)₂][BF₄]?0.6 H₂O}_n during crystallization. In a similar way, [Ag₁₅(C?CtBu)₁₂(CH₃CN)₅][PW₁₂O₄₀] ( 5 ) has been obtained from {[Ag₃(C?CtBu)₂][BF₄]?0.6 H₂O}_n and (nBu₄N)₃[PW₁₂O₄₀]. The use of charged building blocks was intentional, because at these conditions the contribution of long‐range Coulomb interactions would benefit most from full periodicity of the intercluster compound, thus favoring formation of well‐crystalline materials. The latter has been achieved, indeed. However, as a most conspicuous feature, equally charged species aggregate, which demonstrates that the short‐range interactions between the “surfaces” of the clusters represent the more powerful structure direction forces than the long‐range Coulomb bonding. This observation is of significant importance for understanding the mechanisms underlying self‐organization of monodisperse and structurally well‐defined particles of nanometer size.     

Hypervalent Organoselenium(II) Compounds with Organophosphorus Ligands. Crystal and Molecular Structure of [2‐(iPr2NCH2)C6H4]Se[S2PR′2] (R′ = Ph,OiPr)

Redistribution reactions between diorganodiselenides of type [2‐(R₂NCH₂)C₆H₄]₂Se₂ [R = Et, iPr] and bis(diorganophosphinothioyl disulfanes of type [R′₂P(S)S]₂ (R = Ph, OiPr) resulted in the hypervalent [2‐(R₂NCH₂)C₆H₄]SeSP(S)R′₂ [R = Et, R′ = Ph ( 1 ), OiPr ( 2 ); R = iPr, R′ = Ph ( 3 ), OiPr ( 4 )] species. All new compounds were characterized by solution multinuclear NMR spectroscopy (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P, ⁷⁷Se) and the solid compounds 1 , 3 , and 4 also by FT‐IR spectroscopy. The crystal and molecular structures of 3 and 4 were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In both compounds the N(1) atom is intramolecularly coordinated to the selenium atom, resulting in T‐shaped coordination arrangements of type (C,N)SeS. The dithio organophosphorus ligands act monodentate in both complexes, which can be described as essentially monomeric species. Weak intermolecular S ··· H contacts could be considered in the crystal of 3 , thus resulting in polymeric zig‐zag chains of R and S isomers, respectively.     

Synthesen und Reaktionen von Aluminiumalkoxid‐Verbindungen

Syntheses and Reactions of Aluminium Alkoxide Compounds Al(O^cHex)₃ ( 1 ) can be synthesized by the reaction of Al with cyclohexanol under evolving of H₂ in boiling xylene. [Li{Al(OCH₂Ph)₄}] ( 2 ) was obtained by treatment of PhCH₂OH with a 1 M solution of LiAlH₄ in THF. [{(THF)Li}₂{Al(O^tBu)₄}Cl] ( 3 ) is the result of the reaction of four equivalents of LiO^tBu on AlCl₃ in THF. 3 is the educt for the reactions with the Lewis‐acids InCl₃ and FeCl₃ in THF leading to the metalates [{(THF)₂Li}₂{Al(O^tBu)₄}] · [MCl₄] [M = In ( 4 ), Fe ( 5 )]. The attempt to react InCl₃ with four equivalents of LiO^tBu leads to only one isolated and characterized product, the complex [Li₄(O^tBu)₃(THF)₃Cl]₂ · THF ( 6 · THF), which can also be synthesized by the treatment of LiCl with three equivalents of LiO^tBu in THF. 1–6 · THF were characterized by NMR, IR and MS techniques as well as by X‐ray structure determinations. According to them, 1 , which is tetrameric in solution, is the first structurally characterized example of the proposed trimer form of aluminium alkoxides [ROAl{Al(OR)₄}₂] with a central trigonal bipyramidal coordinated Al atom. 2 forms a coordination polymer with a distorted tetrahedral coordination sphere of Li and Al, running along [100]. The trinuclear structure skeleton [{(THF)₂Li}₂{Al(O^tBu)₄}]⁺ is still present in the isotypical metalates 4 and 5 . The counter ions [MCl₄]^– possess nearly T_d symmetry. The remarkable structural motif of 6 · THF are two heterocubanes [Li₄(O^tBu)₃(THF)₃Cl] dimerized by Li–Cl bonds.     

Synthese der Stannatetraphospholane (tBuP)4SnR2 (R = tBu,nBu, C6H5) und (tBuP)4Sn(Cl)nBu Molekül- und Kristallstruktur von (tBuP)4Sn(tBu)2

Synthesis of the Stannatetraphospholanes (tBuP)₄SnR₂ (R = tBu, nBu, C₆H₅) and (tBuP)₄Sn(Cl)nBu Molecular and Crystal Structure of (tBuP)₄Sn(tBu)₂ The reaction of the diphosphide K₂[tBuP-(tBuP)₂-PtBu] 4 with the halogenostannanes (tBu)₂SnCl₂, (nBu)₂SnCl₂, (C₆H₅)₂SnCl₂ or nBuSnCl₃ in a molar ratio of 1 : 1 leads via a [4 + 1]-cyclocondensation reaction to the stannatetraphospholanes (tBuP)₄SnR₂ 3 b–3 d and (tBuP)₄Sn(Cl)nBu 3 e , respectively, with the binary 5-membered P₄Sn ring system. 3 b was characterized by a single crystal structure analysis; the 5-membered ring exists in a planar conformation. The compounds 3 b–3 e were identified by NMR and also by mass spectroscopy; the ³¹P{¹H}-NMR spectra of 3 b–3 d showed an AA′MM′ (AA′MM′X), 3 e on the other hand an ABCD (ABCDX) spin system.     

Ring‐opening polymerization of rac‐lactide catalyzed by Al(III) and Zn(II) complexes incorporating Schiff base ligands derived from pyrrole‐2‐carboxaldehyde

A series of Al(III) chloride [LAl‐Cl]; Al(III) alkoxide [LAl‐OR]₂; and Zn(II) [LZn]₂ complexes with Schiff base ligands were obtained. ¹H NMR and X‐ray diffraction studies indicate that [LAl‐Cl] complexes have C_s symmetry and the Al center is penta‐coordinated. The Al(III) alkoxide complex [L⁵Al‐OⁱPr]₂ is a dimer bridged by OⁱPr^? with the Al center in a distorted octahedral environment. Zn complexes [LZn]₂ are double helix dimers with tetra‐coordinated Zn centers. The catalytic activity for the ring‐opening polymerization of rac‐lactide was evaluated. The best activity in this series is shown by the aluminium chloride complex with a flexible three‐carbon bridge; more flexible four‐carbon bridges lower the activity.     

Synthese und strukturelle Charakterisierung von Borsubphthalocyaninaten

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Boron Subphthalocyaninates Halosubphthalocyaninatoboron, [B(X)_spc] (X = F, Cl, Br) is obtained by heating phthalonitrile with boron trihalide in quinoline (X = F) or the corresponding halobenzene, resp. [B(C₆H₅)_spc] is prepared from phthalonitrile and tetraphenylborate or tetraphenyloboron oxide, resp. [B(OR)_spc] (R = H, CH(CH₃)₂, C(CH₃)₃, C₆H₅) is synthesized by bromide substitution of [B(Br)_spc] in pyridine/HOR. Substitution of [B(Br)_spc] in carboxylic acids yields [B(OOCR)_spc] (R = H, CX₃ (X = H, Cl, F), CH₂X (X = Cl, C₆H₅), C₆H₅). All subphthalocyaninates are characterized electrochemically and by UV‐VIS, IR/FIR, resonance Raman, and ¹H/¹⁰B‐NMR spectroscopy. Typical B–X stretching vibrations are at 622 (X = Br), 950 (Cl), 1063 (F), 1096 cm^–1 (OH) as well as between 1119 and 1052 cm^–1 (OR) resp. 985 and 1028 cm^–1 (OOCR). The difference ν(C=O)–ν(C–O) > 400 cm^–1 confirms the unidentate coordination of the carboxylato ligands. According to the crystal structure analysis of [B(OH)_spc], [B(OH)_spc] · 2 H₂O, [B(C₆H₅)_spc], [B(OC(CH₃)₃)_spc], [B(OOCCH₃)_spc] · 0.5 H₂O · C₂H₅OH and [B(OOCCH₃)_spc] · 0.4 H₂O · 1.1 C₅H₅N the _spc ligand is concavely distorted. This saucer shaped conformation is independent of the acido ligands and the presence of solvate. The outermost C atomes are vertically displaced in part by more than 2 Å from the N_i plane. The B atom is in a distorted tetrahedral coordination geometry. It is displaced by ca 0.64 Å out of the N_i plane towards the acido ligand. The average B–N distance is 1.500 Å, and the B–O distances range from 1.418(5) to 1.473(2) Å.     

Creating Iron– and Rhenium–Bismuth Bonds by Reactions with Organometallic Hydrides

While addition of [Cp₂ReH] to [Bi(OtBu)₃] leads to an equilibrium containing [Cp₂Re‐Bi(OtBu)₂], [{Cp₂Re}₂Bi(OtBu)], tBuOH and [CpRe(μ‐η⁵,η¹‐C₅H₄)Bi–ReCp₂], in the presence of water [{(Cp₂Re)₂Bi}₂O] ( 1 ) is formed selectively. Also [FpH] [Fp = (η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Fe] can be employed as a precursor to form heterometallic bismuth compounds. Synthesis of [FpBi{OCH(CF₃)₂}₂]₂ ( 5 ) can be achieved by reaction of [FpH] with [Bi{OCH(CF₃)₂}₃(thf)]₂ and carboxylates [FpBi(O₂CR)₂]₂ are generated upon treatment of [FpH] with [Bi(O₂CR)₃] (R = CH₃, tBu). While the compounds [Fp‐Bi(O₂CR)₂]₂ can also be obtained from reactions with Fp‐Fp, they are formed far more readily using [FpH] as the precursor. They typically crystallize as dimers, like the alkoxide 5 . A monomeric compound of the type [Fp‐BiX₂] ( 6 ) could be isolated for X = thd (tetramethylheptanedionate), that is, after the reaction of [FpH] with [Bi(thd)₃]. Altogether, the results demonstrate the potential of [FpH] as a precursor for [Fp‐BiX₂] compounds, which are formed in reactions with bismuth alkoxides, carboxylates and diketonates.     

Synthese und Charakterisierung der Siloxialane [H2AlOSiMe3]n und [HAl(OtBu)(OSiMe3)]2 sowie Redoxreaktionen von [H2AlOSiMe3]n und [H2AlOtBu]2 mit einem Zinn(II)‐amid

Synthesis and Characterisation of the Siloxialanes [H₂AlOSiMe₃]_n and [HAl(O^tBu)(OSiMe₃)]₂ as well as the Use of [H₂AlOSiMe₃]_n and [H₂AlO^tBu]₂ as Reducing Agents for a Tin(II) Amide Following the synthesis of [H₂AlO^tBu]₂ ( 1 ) and [HAl(O^tBu)₂]₂ ( 2 ) the siloxialane [H₂AlOSiMe₃]_n ( 3 ) was synthesized and has been subject to single crystal X‐ray analysis for the first time. The molecule 3 is tetrameric (n = 4) in solution and polymeric (n = ∞) in the solid state. 3 is also obtained together with the siloxide [Al(OSiMe₃)₃]₂ ( 5 ) by the reaction of the aluminiumhydride with the double molar amount of trimethylsilanol. The expected monohydride [HAl(OSiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 4 ) was not formed. The heteroleptic monohydride [HAl(O^tBu)(OSiMe₃)]₂ ( 6 ) was synthesized by the reaction of 3 with an equimolar amount of tert‐butanol and was also generated by the addition of trimethylsilanol to an equimolar amount of the alkoxialane [H₂AlO^tBu]₂ ( 1 ). Compound 6 was characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. Additionally we investigated the reducing force of the dihydrides 1 and 3 towards the cyclic diazastannylene Me₂Si(N^tBu)₂Sn ( 7 ). In the course of this reaction Sn^II in 7 was reduced to elementary tin whereas the hydrides were oxidized to hydrogene. Tin is obtained in its β‐form as found by powder‐X‐ray diffraction. The shapes of the metal precipitates (porous, sponge‐like pieces or nanoscaled powders) depend on the conditions of reactions. Besides the elements the spirocyclic aminoalkoxialane [Me₂Si(N^tBu)₂AlO^tBu]₂ ( 8 ) or aminosiloxialane [Me₂Si(N^tBu)₂AlOSiMe₃]₂ ( 9 ) are formed. Structural details of the molecules 8 and 9 can be derived from single crystal X‐ray analyses.     

Sesquialkoxide von Gallium und Indium

Sesquialkoxides of Gallium and Indium Treatment of GaMe₃ with one equivalent of HO^cHex in toluene at 20 °C leads to [Me₂GaO^cHex]₂ ( 4 ) under evolution of methane. The reaction of InMe₃ with two equivalents of HO^cHex leads under similar conditions not to [MeIn(O^cHex)₂]_n but to the sesquialkoxide [In{Me₂In(O^cHex)₂}₃] ( 5 ). 5 can be described also as [{Me₂InO^cHex)}₂{MeIn(O^cHex)₂}₂]. The use of an excess of cyclohexanol in boiling toluene gives the same result. Under these reflux conditions, the reaction of GaMe₃ with an excess of PhCH₂OH leads exclusively to another type of sequialkoxides, [Ga{MeGa(OCH₂Ph)₃}₃] ( 6 ). 4 — 6 were characterized by NMR, vibrational and MS spectra, as well as by X‐ray structure determinations. According to this, 4 forms centrosymmetrical and therefore planar Ga₂O₂ four‐membered rings. 5 and 6 possess basically the same structural motif, central M³⁺ ion ( 5 : In³⁺; 6 : Ga³⁺) coordinated by three metalate units ( 5 : [Me₂In(O^cHex)₂]^—; 6 : [MeGa(OCH₂Ph)₃]^—). The central M³⁺ ions have always coordination number (CN) six while the three surrounding metal ions possess CN 4. Because of the spectroscopic findings 6 must exist in two isomers (1:1). The C₃‐symmetrical isomer C₃‐ 6 was characterized by X‐ray analysis, while the isomer C₁‐ 6 could by described mainly by the complex NMR data.     

Sterically encumbered hexakis(alkylseleno)benzenes: conformational behavior of hexakis(iso-propylselenomethyl)benzene toward Hg ions on selective recognition

An efficient synthesis and structural aspects of a novel class of hexakis(alkylseleno)benzenes [(RSeCH₂)₆C₆] (R = Me, ⁱPr, ⁿBu, ^sBu, ^tBu, ⁿPn, ⁿHx, ⁿOct, 1-methylnaphthalene) by the reaction of hexakis(bromomethyl)benzene with RSe⁻ ions is demonstrated. Preliminary data on ion-sensing properties reveal that these species may act as selective ionophores for Hg²⁺ ions.     

13C and1H NMR spectroscopic characterization of titanium(IV) alkylperoxo complexes Ti(OOtBu)n(OiPr)4?n with n=1, 2, 3, 4

Using¹³C and¹H NMR spectroscopy, titanium(IV) alkylperoxo complexes Ti(OOtBu)_n(OiPr)_4−n with n=1, 2, 3 and 4 were characterized in the reaction of Ti(OiPr)₄ withtBuOOH in CH₂Cl₂ and CDCl₃.     

Functionalization of [Ge9] with Small Silanes:[Ge9(SiR3)3]– (R = iBu,iPr, Et) and the Structures of (CuNHCDipp)[Ge9{Si(iBu)3}3], (K‐18c6)Au[Ge9{Si(iBu)3}3]2, and (K‐18c6)2[Ge9{Si(iBu)3}2]

Novel silylation reactions at [Ge₉] Zintl clusters starting from the chlorosilanes SiR₃Cl (R = iBu, iPr, Et) and the Zintl phase K₄Ge₉ are reported. The formation of the tris‐silylated anions [Ge₉(SiR₃)₃]^– [R = iBu ( 1a ), iPr ( 1b ), Et ( 1c )] by heterogeneous reactions in acetonitrile was monitored by ESI‐MS measurements. For R = iBu ¹H, ¹³C and ²⁹Si NMR experiments confirmed the exclusive formation of 1a . Subsequent reactions of 1a with CuNHC^DippCl and Au(PPh₃)Cl result in formation of the neutral metal complex (CuNHC^Dipp)[Ge₉{Si(iBu)₃}₃]·0.5 tol ( 2 ·0.5 tol) and the metal bridged dimeric unit {Au[Ge₉{Si(iBu)₃}₃]₂}^– ( 3a ), isolated as a (K‐18c6)⁺ salt in (K‐18c6)Au[Ge₉{Si(iBu)₃}₃]₂·tol ( 3 ·tol), respectively. Finally, from a toluene/hexane solution of 1a in presence of 18‐crown‐6, crystals of the compound (K‐18c6)₂[Ge₉{Si(iBu)₃}₂]·tol ( 4 ·tol), containing the bis‐silylated cluster anion [Ge₉(Si(iBu)₃)₂]^2– ( 4a ), were obtained. The compounds 2 ·0.5 tol, 3 ·tol and 4 ·tol were characterized by single‐crystal structure determination.     

Boomerang‐Type Substitution Reaction: Reactivity of Fullerene Epoxides and a Halofullerenol

The C_s‐symmetric fullerene chlorohydrin C₆₀(Cl)(OH)(OOtBu)₄ reacts with 4‐dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) and 1,4‐diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) to yield two isomers with the formula C₆₀(O)(OOtBu)₄ in good yields. These isomers differ with respect to the location of the epoxy functionality. The one from DMAP is C_s symmetric, whereas that from DABCO is C₁ symmetric with the epoxy group on the central pentagon. Two different mechanisms are proposed to explain the chemoselectivity of these reactions. The reaction with DMAP involves single‐electron transfer as the key step; DMAP acts as the electron donor. A combination of an oxygen‐atom shift and S_N2′′ processes (boomerang substitution) are responsible for the formation of isomer with DACBO. Various related reactions support the proposed mechanisms. The structures of new fullerene derivatives were determined by spectroscopy, single‐crystal X‐ray analysis, and chemical correlation experiments.