The in vitro antifungal activity of some dithiocarbamate organotin(IV) compounds on Candida albicans— a model for biological interaction of organotin complexes

The in vitro antifungal activity of the dithiocarbamate organotin complexes [Sn{S₂CN(CH₂)₄}₂Cl₂] ( 1 ), [Sn{S₂CN(CH₂)₄}₂Ph₂] ( 2 ), [Sn{S₂CN(CH₂)₄}Ph₃] ( 3 ), [Sn{S₂CN(CH₂)₄}₂n‐Bu₂] ( 4 ), [Sn{S₂CN(CH₂)₄}Cy₃] {Cy = cyclohexyl} ( 5 ), [Sn{S₂CN(C₂H₅)₂}₂Cl₂] ( 6 ), [Sn{S₂CN(C₂H₅)₂}₂Ph₂] ( 7 ), [Sn{S₂CN(C₂H₅)₂}Ph₃] ( 8 ), [Sn{S₂CN(C₂H₅)₂}₃Ph] ( 9 ) and [Sn{S₂CN(C₂H₅)₂}Cy₃] ( 10 ) has been screened against Candida albicans (ATCC 18804), Candida tropicalis (ATCC 750) and resistant Candida albicans collected from HIV‐positive Brazilian patients with oral candidiasis. All compounds exhibited antifungal activities and complexes 3 and 8 displayed the best results. We have investigated the effect of compounds 1–10 on the cellular activity of the yeast cultures. Changes in mitochondrial function have not been detected. However, all drugs reduced ergosterol biosynthesis. Preliminary studies on DNA integrity indicated that the compounds do not cause gross damage to yeast DNA. The data suggest that these compounds share some mechanisms of action on cell membranes similar to that of polyene but not with azole drugs, normally used in Candida infections. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The Ylide Adduct SOC2(PPh3)2 as Complex Ligand. Reaction with [Mn2(CO)10] and InCl3; Crystal Structures of [(CO)4Mn(SOC2{PPh3}2)2][Mn(CO)5] and (H2C{PPh3}2)[InCl4]2

The betain‐like SOC₂(PPh₃)₂ ( 1a ) reacts with [Mn₂(CO)₁₀] in THF to produce the salt‐like complex [(CO)₄Mn(SOC₂{PPh₃}₂)₂][Mn(CO)₅] ( 2 ). 1a is bonded via the sulfur atoms which are arranged in trans position in the octahedral environment of the manganese atom. With InCl₃ from CH₂Cl₂ solution the addition product [Cl₃In(SOC₂{PPh₃}₂)] ( 3 ) is obtained along with the salt (H₂C{PPh₃}₂)[InCl₄]₂ ( 4 ), which is the result of proton abstraction from the solvent. The crystal structures of 2· 0.5THF and 4· CH₂Cl₂ are reported. The compounds are further characterized by IR and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy.     

Zur Reaktivität von alkylthioverbrückten 44‐CVE‐triangularen Platinclustern: Umsetzungen mit bidentaten Phosphanliganden

On the Reactivity of Alkylthio Bridged 44 CVE Triangular Platinum Clusters: Reactions with Bidentate Phosphine Ligands The 44 cve (cluster valence electrons) triangular platinum clusters [{Pt(PR₃)}₃(μ‐SMe)₃]Cl (PR₃ = PPh₃, 2a ; P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃, 2b ; P(n‐Bu)₃, 2c ) were found to react with PPh₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppm) in a degradation reaction yielding dinuclear platinum(I) complexes [{Pt(PR₃)}₂(μ‐SMe)(μ‐dppm)]Cl (PR₃ = PPh₃, 3a ; P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃, 3b ; P(n‐Bu)₃; 3e ) and the platinum(II) complex [Pt(SMe)₂(dppm)] ( 4 ), whereas the addition of PPh₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppe) to cluster 2a afforded a mixture of degradation products, among others the complexes [Pt(dppe)₂] and [Pt(dppe)₂]Cl₂. On the other hand, the treatment of cluster 2a with PPh₂CH₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppp) ended up in the formation of the cationic complex [{Pt(dppp)}₂(μ‐SMe)₂]Cl₂ ( 5 ). Furthermore, the terminal PPh₃ ligands in complex 3a proved to be subject to substitution by the stronger donating monodentate phosphine ligands PMePh₂ and PMe₂Ph yielding the analogous complexes [{Pt(PR₃)}₂(μ‐SMe)(μ‐dppm)]Cl (PR₃ = PMePh₂, 3c ; PMe₂Ph, 3d ). NMR investigations on complexes 3 showed an inverse correlation of Tolmans electronic parameter ν with the coupling constants ¹J(Pt,P) and ¹J(Pt,Pt). All compounds were fully characterized by means of NMR and IR spectroscopy. X‐ray diffraction analyses were performed for the complexes [{Pt{P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃}}₂(μ‐SMe)(μ‐dppm)]Cl ( 3b ), [Pt(SMe)₂(dppm)] ( 4 ), and [{Pt(dppp)}₂(μ‐SMe)₂]Cl₂ ( 5 ).     

Ligandverhalten von P‐funktionellen Organozinnhalogeniden: Nickel(II)‐, Palladium(II)‐ und Platin(II)‐halogenid‐Komplexe mit Me2(Cl)SnCH2CH2PPh2

Ligand Behaviour of P‐functional Organotin Halides: Nickel(II), Palladium(II), and Platinum(II) Complexes with Me₂(Cl)SnCH₂CH₂PPh₂ Me₂(Cl)SnCH₂CH₂PPh₂ ( 1 ) reacts with Ni^II, Pd^II, and Pt^II halides in molar ratio 2 : 1 forming the complexes [MX₂{PPh₂CH₂CH₂Sn(Cl)Me₂}₂] (M = Ni, Pd, Pt; X = Cl, Br) ( 3 – 6 , 9 , 10 ) ( 7 , 8 : M = Ni; Br instead of Cl). The nickel complexes were isolated and characterized both as the planar ( 3 , 5 , 7 ) and the tetrahedral ( 4 , 6 , 8 ) isomer. Crystal structure analyses and NMR data indicate for the planar nickel complexes 3 , 5 , 7 and [MCl₂{PPh₂CH₂CH₂Sn(Cl)Me₂}₂] ( 9 : M = Pd; 10 : M = Pt) the existence of intra and intermolecular M–Hal…Sn bridges. In a ligand : metal molar ratio of 3 : 1 the complexes [M^éCl{PPh₂CH₂CH₂Sn^⊖Cl₂Me₂}{PPh₂CH₂CH₂Sn(Cl)Me₂}₂] ( 11 : M = Pd; 12 : M = Pt) are formed which represent intramolecular ion pairs. By dehalogenation of [PdCl₂{PPh₂CH₂CH₂Sn(Cl)Me₂}₂] ( 9 ) with sodium amalgam and graphite potassium (C₈K), respectively, the palladacycles cis‐[Pd{PPh₂CH₂CH₂SnMe₂}₂] ( 13 ) and trans‐[Pd(Cl)PPh₂CH₂CH₂SnMe₂{PPh₂CH₂CH₂Sn(Cl)Me₂}] ( 14 ) are formed. From the compounds 1 , 3 , 9 , 11 , and 12 the crystal structures are determined. All compounds are characterized by ¹H, ³¹P, and ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectroscopy.     

Nucleophilic Aromatic Addition Reactions of the Metallabenzenes and Metallapyridinium: Attacking Aromatic Metallacycles with Bis(diphenylphosphino)methane to Form Metallacyclohexadienes and Cyclic η2‐Allene‐Coordinated Complexes

The reactions of phosphonium‐substituted metallabenzenes and metallapyridinium with bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (DPPM) were investigated. Treatment of [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl₂(PPh₃)₂]Cl with DPPM produced osmabenzenes [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl₂{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}]Cl ( 2 ), [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl₂ ( 3 ), and cyclic osmium η²‐allene complex [Os{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?(η²‐C?CH)}Cl₂{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl ( 4 ). When the analogue complex of osmabenzene 1 , ruthenabenzene [Ru{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl₂(PPh₃)₂]Cl, was used, the reaction produced ruthenacyclohexadiene [Ru{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?C(PPh₃)CH}Cl{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl₂ ( 6 ), which could be viewed as a Jackson–Meisenheimer complex. Complex 6 is unstable in solution and can easily be convert to the cyclic ruthenium η²‐allene complexes [Ru{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?(η²‐C?CH)}Cl{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl₂ ( 7 ) and [Ru{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?(η²‐C?CH)}Cl₂{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl ( 8 ). The key intermediates of the reactions have been isolated and fully characterized, further supporting the proposed mechanism for the reactions. Similar reactions also occurred in phosphonium‐substituted metallapyridinium [OsCl₂{NHC(CH₃)C(Ph)C(PPh₃)CH}(PPh₃)₂]BF₄ to give the cyclic osmium η²‐allene‐imine complex [OsCl₂{NH?C(CH₃)C(Ph)?(η²‐C?CH)}{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}(PPh₃)]BF₄ ( 11 ).     

Synthesis,crystal structure and electrochemical properties of three isocloso eleven‐vertex ferrocenecarboxylate ruthenaborane clusters

The reaction of [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] with closo‐[B₁₀H₁₀]^2? and C₅H₅FeC₅H₄COOH (FcCO₂H) in refluxing CH₂Cl₂ solution affords three ruthenaborane clusters: [PPh₃(H₂O)(FcCO₂)RuB₁₀H₈Cl] (1), [(PPh₃)₂ClRu(PPh₃)(FcCO₂)RuB₁₀H₉]·0.5CH₂Cl₂ (2 × 0.5CH₂Cl₂) and [PPh₃(FcCO₂)₂RuB₁₀H₈] (3). All of these compounds are characterized by FT‐IR, NMR spectroscopic techniques, elemental analysis and single‐crystal X‐ray analysis. They are all based on a closo‐type 1:2:4:2:2 {RuB₁₀} stack with the metal occupying the unique six‐connected apical position and can be considered as having isocloso structures derived from the complete capping of the open face of an arachano geometry to give a completely closed deltahedral cluster. Compounds 1 and 2 both have an exo‐polyhedral ferrocenecarboxylate that is attached with one {Ru? O} and one {B? O} bond each, resulting in one exo‐cyclic five‐membered Ru? O? C? O? B ring. There is in addition one exo‐polyhedral ruthenium atom bonded to the center {RuB₁₀} cluster via one {Ru? Ru} linkage and two {RuH_µB} bridges, which forms a closed exo‐polyhedral tetrahedron configuration in compound 2. Compound 3 has two exo‐polyhedral ferrocenecarboxylates to form two five‐membered Ru? O? C? O? B rings engendering a symmetrical conformation. All of these new 11‐vertex ruthenaboranes can be considered as having isocloso structures derived from the complete capping of the open face of an arachano geometry to give a completely closed deltahedral cluster. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Die Kristallstrukturen der Hexachlorometallate NH4[SbCl6], NH4[WCl6], [K(18‐Krone‐6)(CH2Cl2)]2[WCl6]·6CH2Cl2 und (PPh4)2[WCl6]·4CH3CN

Crystal Structures of the Hexachlorometalates NH₄[SbCl₆], NH₄[WCl₆], [K(18‐crown‐6)(CH₂Cl₂)]₂[WCl₆]·6CH₂Cl₂ and (PPh₄)₂[WCl₆]·4CH₃CN The crystal structures of the title compounds were determined by single crystal X‐ray methods. NH₄[SbCl₆] and NH₄[WCl₆] crystallize isotypically in the space group C2/c with four formula units per unit cell. The NH₄⁺ ions occupy a twofold crystallographic axis, whereas the metal atoms of the [MCl₆]^— ions occupy a centre of inversion. There exist weak interionic hydrogen bridges. [K(18‐crown‐6)(CH₂Cl₂)]₂[WCl₆]·6CH₂Cl₂ crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group R3¯/m with Z = 3. The compound forms centrosymmetric ion triples, in which the potassium ions are coordinated with a WCl₃ face each. In trans‐position to it the chlorine atom of a CH₂Cl₂ molecule is coordinated so that, together with the oxygen atoms of the crown ether, coordination number 10 is achieved. (PPh₄)₂[WCl₆]·4CH₃CN crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with Z = 4. This compound, too, forms centrosymmetric ion triples, in which in addition the acetonitrile molecules are connected with the [WCl₆]^2— ion via weak C—H···Cl contacts.     

Synthesis and crystal structure of three nido 11‐vertex platinaborane clusters

The reaction of [PtCl₂(PPh₃)₂] with closo‐B₁₀H₁₀^2? in ethanol under reflux conditions gave two nido 11‐vertex platinaundecaborane clusters: [(PPh₃)₂PtB₁₀H₁₀‐8,10‐(OEt)₂]·CH₂Cl₂ (1) and [(PPh₃)₂PtB₁₀H₁₁‐11‐OEt]·CH₂Cl₂ (2) . A novel B₁₀H₁₀^2? deboronated nido 11‐vertex diplatinaundecaborane [(µ‐PPh₂)(PPh₃)₂Pt₂B₉H₆‐3,9,11‐(OEt)₃]·CH₂Cl₂ (3) was obtained when the same reaction was carried out under solvothermal conditions. All of these compounds were characterized by infrared spectroscopy, NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Both clusters 1 and 2 have a nido 11‐vertex {PtB₁₀} polyhedral skeleton in which the Pt atom lies in the open PtB₄ face. Each Pt atom connects with four B atoms and two P atoms of the PPh₃ ligands. Cluster 3 has a nido 11‐vertex {Pt₂B₉} polyhedral skeleton in which two Pt atoms sit in neighbouring positions of the open Pt₂B₃ face, bridged by a PPh₂ group. Each Pt atom connects three B atoms and a P atom of the PPh₃ ligand. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

THE REACTIONS OF [MoCl(GeCl3)(CO)3(NCMe)2] WITH NEUTRAL BI- AND TERDENTATE DONOR LIGANDS

Abstract

The reaction of [MoCl(GeCl₃)(CO)₃(NCMe)₂] with an equimolar quantity of L?L {L?L = 2,2′-bipy, 1,10-phen, Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂ (n = 1 or 2)} in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature gave either [MoCl(GeCl₃)(CO)₃(L?L)] (L?L = 2,2′-bipy or 1,10-phen) (1 and 2) or [MoCl(GeCl₃)(CO)₂ (NCMe)(L?L)]{L?L = Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂ (n = 1 or 2) (3 or 4), respectively. Equimolar quantities of [MoCl(GeCl₃)(CO)₂(NCMe){Ph₂P(CH₂)PPh₂}] (3) and L?L {L?L = 2,2′-bipy or Ph₂P(CH)₂PPh₂} react in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature to afford the cationic complexes [Mo(GeCl₃)(CO)₂{Ph₂P(CH₂) PPh₂}(L?L)]Cl (5 and 6) in good yield. The cationic nature of 6 was established by chloride exchange by reacting Na[BPh₄] with 6 in acetonitrile to give the tetraphenylborate complex [Mo(GeCl₃)(CO)₂{Ph₂P(CH₂)PPh₂}₂][BPh₄] (7). Reaction of equimolar quantities of [MoCl(GeCl₃) (CO)₃(NCMe)₂] and PhP(CH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂ in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature afforded the dicarbonyl complex [MoCl(GeCl₃)(CO)₂{PhP(CH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂}] (8) in good yield.     

Die Oxochlorotantalate (PPh4)2[Ta2OCl9]2 · 2 CH2Cl2, (PPh4)2[Ta2OCl10] · 2 CH3CN und (K-18-Krone-6)4[Ta4O6Cl12] · 12 CH2Cl2

The Oxochlorotantalates (PPh₄)₂[Ta₂OCl₉]₂ · 2 CH₂Cl₂, (PPh₄)₂[Ta₂OCl₁₀] · 2 CH₃CN, and (K-18-crown-6)₄[Ta₄O₆Cl₁₂] · 12 CH₂Cl₂ (K-18-crown-6)₄[Ta₄O₆Cl₁₂] · 12 CH₂Cl₂ was obtained from a reaction of tantalum pentachloride, K₂S₅ and 18-crwon-6 in dichlormethane. According to its crystal structure analysis it is tetragonal (space group I 4 2d) and contains [Ta₄O₆Cl₁₂]^4– ions that have an adamantane-like Ta₄O₆ skeleton. Each K⁺ ion is coordinated by the oxygen atoms of the crown ether molecule from one side and with three Cl atoms of one [Ta₄O₆Cl₁₂]^4– ion from the opposite side. (PPh₄)₂[Ta₂OCl₁₀] · 2 CH₃CN was a product from PPh₄Cl and TaCl₅ in acetonitrile in the presence of Na₂S₄. Its crystals are monoclinic (space group P2₁/c) and contain centrosymmetric [Ta₂OCl₁₀]^2– ions having a linear Ta–O–Ta grouping with short bonds (Ta–O 189 pm). TaCl₅ and H₂S formed a solid substance (TaSCl₃) from which a small amount of (PPh₄)₂[Ta₂OCl₉]₂ · 2 CH₂Cl₂ was obtained by the reaction with PPh₄Cl in CH₂Cl₂. The anions in the monoclinic crystals (space group P2₁/n) consist of two Ta₂OCl₉^– units which are joined by chloro bridges; each Ta₂OCl₉^– unit has a nearly linear Ta–O–Ta group with differing bond lengths (179 and 202 pm). The oxygen in the compounds probably was introduced by traces of water in the crown ether, acetonitrile or H₂S, respectively.     

Platinum,iridium and rhodium complexes with substituted bis-(diphenylphosphino)methane ligands Ph2PCH(R)PPh2 (R = Me,Ph or SiMe3)

Substituted phosphines of the type Ph₂PCH(R)PPh₂ and their Pt^II complexes [PtX₂{Ph₂PCH(R)PPh₂}] (R = Me, Ph or SiMe₃; X = halide) were prepared. Treatment of [PtCl₂(NCBu^t)₂] with Ph₂PCH(SiMe₃)-PPh₂ gave [PtCl₂(Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)], while treatment with Ph₂PCH(Ph)PPh₂ gave [Pt{Ph₂PCH(Ph)PPh₂}₂]Cl₂. Reaction of p-MeC₆H₄C≡CLi or PhC≡CLi with [PtX₂{Ph₂PCH(Me)PPh₂}] gave [Pt(C≡CC₆H₄Me-p)₂-{Ph₂PCH(Me)PPh₂}] (X = I) and [Pt{Ph₂PC(Me)PPh₂}₂](X = Cl),while reaction of p-MeC₆H₄C≡CLi with [Pt{Ph₂PCH(Ph)PPh₂}₂]Cl₂ gave [Pt{Ph₂PC(Ph)PPh₂}₂]. The platinum complexes [PtMe₂(dpmMe)] or [Pt(CH₂)₄(dpmMe)] fail to undergo ring-opening on treatment with one equivalent of dpmMe [dpmMe = Ph₂PCH(Me)PPh₂]. Treatment of [Ir(CO)Cl(PPh₃)₂] with two equivalents of dpmMe gave [Ir(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl. The PF₆ salt was also prepared. Treatment of [Ir(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl with [Cu(C≡CPh)₂], [AgCl(PPh₃)] or [AuCl(PPh₃)] failed to give heterobimetallic complexes. Attempts to prepare the dinuclear rhodium complex [Rh₂(CO)₃(μ-Cl)(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄ using a procedure similar to that employed for an analogous dpm (dpm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) complex were unsuccessful. Instead, the mononuclear complex [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄ was obtained. The corresponding chloride and PF₆ salts were also prepared. Attempts to prepare [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl in CHCl₃ gave [RhHCl(dpmMe)₂]Cl. Recrystallization of [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄ from CHCl₃/EtOH gave [RhO₂(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄. Treatment of [Rh(CO)₂Cl₂]₂ with one equivalent of dpmMe per Rh atom gave two compounds, [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl and a dinuclear complex that undergoes exchange at room temperature between two formulae: [Rh₂(CO)₂(μ-Cl)(μ-CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl and [Rh₂(CO)₂-(μ-Cl)(dpmMe)₂]Cl. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Synthesis and characterization of arsacycloalkanes and their palladium and platinum complexes,and X‐ray structure of [PdCl2(PhAsCH2CH2CH2CH2CH2)2]

Reactions of PhAsCl₂ with BrMg(CH₂)_nMgBr (n = 4 or 5) in THF gave phenylarsacycloalkanes as colourless oily liquids which could be distilled under vacuum. Treatment of PhAs(CH₂)_n­with MCl₂(RCN)₂ (M = Pd or Pt; R = Ph­or Me) afforded mononuclear complexes, [MCl₂{PhAs(CH₂)_n}₂]. Reactions with [Pt₂Cl₂(μ‐Cl)₂(PEt₃)₂] gave mixed‐ligand complexes, [PtCl₂(PEt₃){PhAs(CH₂)_n]. The palladium complexes adopt a trans geometry whereas the platinum complexes exist in a cis configuration. The crystal and molecular structure of [PdCl₂(PhAsCH₂CH₂CH₂CH₂CH₂)₂] was determined by X‐ray diffraction methods. The molecule consists of a square‐planar palladium atom with trans chlorides and trans arsa ligands. The six‐membered ‘AsC₅′ ring adopts a chair conformation. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A rare octacoordinated mononuclear iron(III) spin‐crossover compound: synthesis,crystal structure and magnetic properties

The chemistry of transition‐metal complexes with unusually high coordination numbers has been of interest because of their application in catalytic and biological systems. Deprotonation of the ionogenic tetradentate ligand 6,6′‐bis(1H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine [H₂bipy(ttr)₂] in the presence of iron(III) and tetra‐n‐butylammonium bromide, [n‐Bu₄N]Br, in solution resulted in the synthesis of a rare octacoordinated anionic mononuclear complex, tetra‐n‐butylammonium bis[6,6′‐bis(tetrazol‐1‐id‐5‐yl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine]iron(III) methanol hemisolvate dihydrate, (C₁₆H₃₆N)[Fe(C₁₂H₆N₁₀)₂]·0.5CH₃OH·2H₂O or [n‐Bu₄N][Fe{bipy(ttr)₂}₂]·0.5CH₃OH·2H₂O ( 1 ), which has been structurally characterized by elemental analysis, powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In 1 , the coordination sphere of the iron(III) ion is a distorted bis‐disphenoid dodecahedron, in which the eight coordination positions are occupied by eight N atoms from two independent tetradentate [bipy(ttr)₂]^2? anionic ligands, therefore forming the anionic [Fe{bipy(ttr)₂}₂]^? unit, with the negative charge balanced by a free [n‐Bu₄N]⁺ cation. An investigation of the magnetic properties of 1 revealed a gradual incomplete spin‐crossover behaviour below 150 K.     

Reactions of IrHCl2(PPh3)2{P(OEt)3} with Organic Azides: Formation of Aminophosphonium Salts

Aminophosphonium salts [Ph₃PN(H)R]BPh₄ ( 1 ) [R = C₆H₅CH₂ ( 1a ), 4‐CH₃C₆H₄CH₂ ( 1b ), C₆H₅ ( 1c )] were obtained by allowing hydride IrHCl₂(PPh₃)₂{P(OEt)₃} to react first with triflic acid and then with the organic azide RN₃. The compounds were characterized spectroscopically and by X‐ray crystal structure determination of [Ph₃PN(H)CH₂C₆H₄‐4‐CH₃]BPh₄ ( 1b ). A reaction path for the formation of aminophosphonium cations is also proposed.     

Coordination behaviour of the 2‐(N,N‐dimethylaminomethyl)phenyl ligand towards the di‐t‐butylchlorotin(IV) moiety

{2‐(N,N‐Dimethylaminomethyl)phenyl}(di‐t‐butyl)tin(IV)chloride, {2‐[(CH₃)₂NCH₂]C₆H₄}Sn(t‐Bu)₂ Cl, has been prepared and characterized using NMR and crystallography. This is the first example of a triorganotin(IV) halide containing the 2‐[(CH₃)₂NCH₂]C₆H₄—group as a C,N‐chelating ligand with a weak intramolecular Sn—N interaction because of the steric hindrance of t‐butyl groups. The interatomic Sn—N distance is elongated to 2.904(14) Å and the central tin atom is distorted trigonal bipyramidal. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Different Complexation Behavior of P‐Functionalized Ferrocene Derivatives Towards SnCl2, SnCl4 and SnPh2Cl2: Auto‐ionization and Redox‐Type Reactions

The novel phosphonyl‐substituted ferrocene derivatives [Fe(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁵‐C₅H₃{P(O)(O‐iPr)₂}₂‐1,2)] ( Fc^1,2 ) and [Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₄P(O)(O‐iPr)₂}₂] ( Fc^1,1′ ) react with SnCl₂, SnCl₄, and SnPh₂Cl₂, giving the corresponding complexes [(Fc^1,2)₂SnCl][SnCl₃] ( 1 ), [{(Fc^1,1′)SnCl₂}_n] ( 2 ), [(Fc^1,1′)SnCl₄] ( 3 ), [{(Fc^1,1′)SnPh₂Cl₂}_n] ( 4 ), and [(Fc^1,2)SnCl₄] ( 5 ), respectively. The compounds are characterized by elemental analyses, ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P, ¹¹⁹Sn NMR and IR spectroscopy, ³¹P and ¹¹⁹Sn CP‐MAS NMR spectroscopy, cyclovoltammetry, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, and single‐crystal as well as powder X‐ray diffraction analyses. The experimental work is accompanied by DFT calculations, which help to shed light on the origin for the different reaction behavior of Fc^1,1′ and Fc^1,2 towards tin(II) chloride.     

Reaktionen des [η2-{P–PtBu2}Pt(PPh3)2] und [η2-{P–PtBu2}Pt(dppe)] mit Metallcarbonylen. Bildung von [η2-{(CO)5M · PPtBu2}Pt(PPh3)2] (M = Cr,W) und [η2-{(CO)5Cr · PPtBu2}Pt(dppe)]

Coordination Chemistry of P-rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XVI [1] Reactions of [g²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] and [g²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] with Metal Carbonyls. Formation of [g²-{(CO)₅M · PP^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] (M = Cr, W) and [g²-{(CO)₅Cr · PP^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] [η²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 4 reacts with M(CO)₅ · THF (M = Cr, W) by adding the M(CO)₅ group to the phosphinophosphinidene ligand yielding [η²-{(CO)₅Cr · PP^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 1 , or [η²-{(CO)₅W · PP^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 2 , respectively. Similarly, [η²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] 5 yields [η²-{(CO)₅Cr · PP^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] 3 . Compounds 1 , 2 and 3 are characterized by their ¹H- and ³¹P-NMR spectra, for 2 and 3 also crystal structure determinations were performed. 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n (no. 14) with a = 1422.7(1) pm, b = 1509.3(1) pm, c = 2262.4(2) pm, β = 103.669(9)°. 3 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 (no. 2) with a = 1064.55(9) pm, b = 1149.9(1) pm, c = 1693.2(1) pm, α = 88.020(8)°, β = 72.524(7)°, γ = 85.850(8)°.     

Ruthenium complexes containing group 5b donor ligands : Part VII. Rearrangement reactions of some ruthenium (II) complexes containing triphenylphosphine,tri-p-tolylphosphine or ethyldiphenylphosphine ligands.

As for [RuCl₂(PPh₃₃], carbonylation of [RuCl₂(PR₃)₃] [PR₃ = P(p-tolyl)₃, PEtPh₂) in N,N ¹-dimethylformamide (dmf) gives [Ru(CO)Cl₂ (dmf) (PR₃)₂] (II). For PR₃ = PEtPh₂, rearrangement of (II) in various solvents gives inseparable mixtures (³¹P evidence) but for PR₃ = P(p-tolyl)₃ [Ru₂(CO)₂Cl₄-{P(p-tolyl)₃}₃]is obtained. Reaction of [Ru(CO)Cl₂ (dmf) - {P(p-tolyl)₃}₂] with [RuCI₂{(P(p-tolyl)₃}₃] (1:1 mol ratio) gives [Ru₂ (CO) Cl₄ {P (p-tolyl)₃}₄] whereas reaction of [Ru (CO) Cl₂ (dmf) - (PPh₃₂] with (Rul₂ {P (p-tolyl)₃}₃] gives [Ru₂(CO)Cl₄ (PPh₃)₂] - {P(p-tolyl)₃}₂] - Reaction of [RuCl₂ {P(p-tolyl)₃}₃] with CS₂ gives the related [Ru₂Cl₄(CS) {P(p-tolyl)₃}₄] and [{RuCl₂(CS)}P(p-tolyl)₃{₂}₂] whereas [RuCl₂(PEtPh₂)₃] and CS₂ produce [RuCl₂(S₂CPEtPh₂) (PEtPh₂)₂]CS₂ and [Ru₂Cl₄(CS)₂(PEtph₂)₃].     

Complexes of N‐Thiophosphorylthiourea α‐NaphthylNHC(S)NHP(S)(OiPr)2 (HL) with Copper(I). Crystal Structures of HL and Cu(PPh3)2L

Reaction of the potassium salt of N‐thiophosphorylated thiourea α‐naphthylNHC(S)NHP(S)(OiPr)₂ ( HL ) with Cu(PPh₃)₃I in aqueous EtOH/CH₂Cl₂ leads to the mononuclear complex [Cu(PPh₃)₂L–S,S′]. By using copper(I) iodide instead ofCu(PPh₃)₃I, the polynuclear complex [Cu_n(L–S,S′)_n] was obtained. The structures of these compounds were investigated by elemental analysis, ¹H and ³¹P{¹H} NMR and IR spectroscopy. The crystal structures of HL and Cu(PPh₃)₂L were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Silver–Ethene Complexes [Ag(η2‐C2H4)n][Al(ORF)4] with n=1, 2, 3 (RF=Fluorine‐Substituted Group)

Compounds including the free or coordinated gas‐phase cations [Ag(η²‐C₂H₄)_n]⁺ (n=1–3) were stabilized with very weakly coordinating anions [A]^? (A=Al{OC(CH₃)(CF₃)₂}₄, n=1 ( 1 ); Al{OC(H)(CF₃)₂}₄, n=2 ( 3 ); Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₄, n=3 ( 5 ); {(F₃C)₃CO}₃Al‐F‐Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₃, n=3 ( 6 )). They were prepared by reaction of the respective silver(I) salts with stoichiometric amounts of ethene in CH₂Cl₂ solution. As a reference we also prepared the isobutene complex [(Me₂C?CH₂)Ag(Al{OC(CH₃)(CF₃)₂}₄)] ( 2 ). The compounds were characterized by multinuclear solution‐NMR, solid‐state MAS‐NMR, IR and Raman spectroscopy as well as by their single crystal X‐ray structures. MAS‐NMR spectroscopy shows that the [Ag(η²‐C₂H₄)₃]⁺ cation in its [Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₄]^? salt exhibits time‐averaged D_3h‐symmetry and freely rotates around its principal z‐axis in the solid state. All routine X‐ray structures (2θ_max.<55°) converged within the 3σ limit at C?C double bond lengths that were shorter or similar to that of free ethene. In contrast, the respective Raman active C?C stretching modes indicated red‐shifts of 38 to 45 cm^?1, suggesting a slight C?C bond elongation. This mismatch is owed to residual librational motion at 100 K, the temperature of the data collection, as well as the lack of high angular data owing to the anisotropic electron distribution in the ethene molecule. Therefore, a method for the extraction of the C?C distance in [M(C₂H₄)] complexes from experimental Raman data was developed and meaningful C?C distances were obtained. These spectroscopic C?C distances compare well to newly collected X‐ray data obtained at high resolution (2θ_max.=100°) and low temperature (100 K). To complement the experimental data as well as to obtain further insight into bond formation, the complexes with up to three ligands were studied theoretically. The calculations were performed with DFT (BP86/TZVPP, PBE0/TZVPP), MP2/TZVPP and partly CCSD(T)/AUG‐cc‐pVTZ methods. In most cases several isomers were considered. Additionally, [M(C₂H₄)₃] (M=Cu⁺, Ag⁺, Au⁺, Ni⁰, Pd⁰, Pt⁰, Na⁺) were investigated with AIM theory to substantiate the preference for a planar conformation and to estimate the importance of σ donation and π back donation. Comparing the group 10 and 11 analogues, we find that the lack of π back bonding in the group 11 cations is almost compensated by increased σ donation.