Super d-antimagic labelings of disconnected plane graphs

This paper deals with the problem of labeling the vertices, edges and faces of a plane graph in such a way that the label of a face and the labels of the vertices and edges surrounding that face add up to a weight of that face, and the weights of all s-sided faces constitute an arithmetic progression of difference d, for each s that appears in the graph. The paper examines the existence of such labelings for disjoint union of plane graphs.     

Face Antimagic Labeling of Jahangir Graph

This paper deals with the problem of labeling the vertices, edges and faces of a plane graph. A weight of a face is the sum of the label of a face and the labels of the vertices and edges surrounding that face. In a super d-antimagic labeling the vertices receive the smallest labels and the weights of all s-sided faces constitute an arithmetic progression of difference d, for each s that appearing in the graph. The paper examines the existence of super d-antimagic labelings for Jahangir graphs for certain differences d.     

Super Face Antimagic Labelings of Union of Antiprisms

In this paper we deal with the problem of labeling the vertices, edges and faces of a disjoint union of m copies of antiprism by the consecutive integers starting from 1 in such a way that the set of face-weights of all s-sided faces forms an arithmetic progression with common difference d, where by the face-weight we mean the sum of the label of that face and the labels of vertices and edges surrounding that face. Such a labeling is called super if the smallest possible labels appear on the vertices. The paper examines the existence of such labelings for union of antiprisms for several values of the difference d.     

Face labelings of Klein-bottle fullerenes

The Klein-bottle fullerene is a finite trivalent graph embedded on the Klein-bottle such that each face is a hexagon. The paper deals with the problem of labeling the vertices, edges and faces of the Klein-bottle fullerene in such a way that the label of a face and the labels of the vertices and edges surrounding that face add up to a weight of that face and the weights of all 6-sided faces constitute an arithmetic progression of difference d. In this paper we study the existence of such labelings for several differences d.     

On antimagic directed graphs

An antimagic labeling of an undirected graph G with n vertices and m edges is a bijection from the set of edges of G to the integers {1, …, m} such that all n vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where a vertex sum is the sum of labels of all edges incident with that vertex. A graph is called antimagic if it admits an antimagic labeling. In (N. Hartsfield and G. Ringel, Pearls in Graph Theory, Academic Press, Boston, 1990, pp. 108–109), Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every simple connected graph, other than K₂, is antimagic. Despite considerable effort in recent years, this conjecture is still open. In this article we study a natural variation; namely, we consider antimagic labelings of directed graphs. In particular, we prove that every directed graph whose underlying undirected graph is “dense” is antimagic, and that almost every undirected d‐regular graph admits an orientation which is antimagic. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 64: 219–232, 2010     

Regular bipartite graphs are antimagic

A labeling of a graph G is a bijection from E(G) to the set {1, 2,… |E(G)|}. A labeling is antimagic if for any distinct vertices u and v, the sum of the labels on edges incident to u is different from the sum of the labels on edges incident to v. We say a graph is antimagic if it has an antimagic labeling. In 1990, Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every connected graph other than K₂ is antimagic. In this article, we show that every regular bipartite graph (with degree at least 2) is antimagic. Our technique relies heavily on the Marriage Theorem. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 60: 173–182, 2009     

Anti‐magic graphs via the Combinatorial NullStellenSatz

An antimagic labeling of a graph with m edges and n vertices is a bijection from the set of edges to the integers 1,…,m such that all n vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where a vertex sum is the sum of labels of all edges incident with that vertex. A graph is called antimagic if it has an antimagic labeling. In [ 10 ], Ringel conjectured that every simple connected graph, other than K₂, is antimagic. We prove several special cases and variants of this conjecture. Our main tool is the Combinatorial NullStellenSatz (cf. [ 1 ]). © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

Distance and routing labeling schemes for non-positively curved plane graphs

Distance labeling schemes are schemes that label the vertices of a graph with short labels in such a way that the distance between any two vertices u and v can be determined efficiently (e.g., in constant or logarithmic time) by merely inspecting the labels of u and v, without using any other information. Similarly, routing labeling schemes are schemes that label the vertices of a graph with short labels in such a way that given the label of a source vertex and the label of a destination, it is possible to compute efficiently (e.g., in constant or logarithmic time) the port number of the edge from the source that heads in the direction of the destination. In this paper we show that the three major classes of non-positively curved plane graphs enjoy such distance and routing labeling schemes using O(log²n) bit labels on n-vertex graphs. In constructing these labeling schemes interesting metric properties of those graphs are employed.     

Vertex-antimagic labelings of regular graphs

Let G = (V, E) be a finite, simple and undirected graph with p vertices and q edges. An (a, d)-vertex-antimagic total labeling of G is a bijection f from V (G) ∪ E(G) onto the set of consecutive integers 1, 2, . . . , p + q, such that the vertex-weights form an arithmetic progression with the initial term a and difference d, where the vertex-weight of x is the sum of the value f (x) assigned to the vertex x together with all values f (xy) assigned to edges xy incident to x. Such labeling is called super if the smallest possible labels appear on the vertices. In this paper, we study the properties of such labelings and examine their existence for 2r-regular graphs when the difference d is 0, 1, . . . , r + 1.     

Group labelings of graphs

Given a graph Γ an abelian group G, and a labeling of the vertices of Γ with elements of G, necessary and sufficient conditions are stated for the existence of a labeling of the edges in which the label of each vertex equals the product of the labels of its incident edges. Such an edge labeling is called compatible. For vertex labelings satisfying these conditions, the set of compatible edge labelings is enumerated.     

Characterization of Product Anti-Magic Graphs of Large Order

A graph G is product anti-magic if one can bijectively label its edges with integers 1, . . . ,e(G) so that no two vertices have the same product of incident labels. This property was introduced by Figueroa-Centeno, Ichishima, and Muntaner-Batle who in particular conjectured that every connected graph with at least 4 vertices is product anti-magic. Here, we completely describe all product anti-magic graphs of sufficiently large order, confirming the above conjecture in this case. Our proof uses probabilistic methods. Reverts to public domain 28 years from publication. Partially supported by the National Science Foundation, Grant DMS-0457512.     

On anti-magic labeling for graph products

An anti-magic labeling of a finite simple undirected graph with p vertices and q edges is a bijection from the set of edges to the set of integers {1,2,…,q} such that the vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where the vertex sum at one vertex is the sum of labels of all edges incident to such vertex. A graph is called anti-magic if it admits an anti-magic labeling. Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured in 1990 that all connected graphs except K₂ are anti-magic. Recently, Alon et al. showed that this conjecture is true for dense graphs, i.e. it is true for p-vertex graphs with minimum degree Ω(logp). In this article, new classes of sparse anti-magic graphs are constructed through Cartesian products and lexicographic products.     

Antimagic labeling of generalized pyramid graphs

An antimagic labeling of a graph withq edges is a bijection from the set of edges to the set of positive integers{1,2,...,q}such that all vertex weights are pairwise distinct,where the vertex weight of a vertex is the sum of the labels of all edges incident with that vertex.A graph is antimagic if it has an antimagic labeling.In this paper,we provide antimagic labelings for a family of generalized pyramid graphs.     

Equitable labelings of cycles

Every labeling of the vertices of a graph with distinct natural numbers induces a natural labeling of its edges: the label of an edge (x, y) is the absolute value of the difference of the labels of x and y. By analogy with graceful labelings, we say that a labeling of the vertices of a graph of order n is minimally k-equitable if the vertices are labeled with 1,2,…, n and in the induced labeling of its edges every label either occurs exactly k times or does not occur at all. Bloom [3] posed the following question: Is the condition that k is a proper divisor of n sufficient for the cycle C_n to have a minimal k-equitable labeling? We give a positive answer to this question. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

(d,1)‐total labeling of graphs with a given maximum average degree

The (d,1)‐total number of a graph G is the width of the smallest range of integers that suffices to label the vertices and the edges of G so that no two adjacent vertices have the same color, no two incident edges have the same color, and the distance between the color of a vertex and its incident edges is at least d. In this paper, we prove that for connected graphs with a given maximum average degree. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

Antimagic Labeling of Cubic Graphs

An antimagic labeling of a graph G is a one‐to‐one correspondence between and such that the sum of the labels assigned to edges incident to distinct vertices are different. If G has an antimagic labeling, then we say G is antimagic. This article proves that cubic graphs are antimagic.     

Construction of Antimagic Labeling for the Cartesian Product of Regular Graphs

An antimagic labeling of a graph with p vertices and q edges is a bijection from the set of edges to the set of integers {1, 2, . . . , q} such that all vertex weights are pairwise distinct, where a vertex weight is the sum of labels of all edges incident with the vertex. A graph is antimagic if it has an antimagic labeling. In 1990, Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that that every connected graph, except K ₂, is antimagic. Recently, using completely separating systems, Phanalasy et al. showed that for each k 3 2, q 3 \binomk+12{k\geq 2,\,q\geq\binom{k+1}{2}} with k|2q, there exists an antimagic k-regular graph with q edges and p = 2q/k vertices. In this paper we prove constructively that certain families of Cartesian products of regular graphs are antimagic.     

Consecutive magic graphs

Let G be a graph of order n and size e. A vertex-magic total labeling is an assignment of the integers 1,2,…,n+e to the vertices and the edges of G, so that at each vertex, the vertex label and the labels on the edges incident at that vertex, add to a fixed constant, called the magic number of G. Such a labeling is a-vertex consecutive magic if the set of the labels of the vertices is {a+1,a+2,…,a+n}, and is b-edge consecutive magic if the set of labels of the edges is {b+1,b+2,…,b+e}. In this paper we prove that if an a-vertex consecutive magic graph has isolated vertices then the order and the size satisfy (n-1)²+n²=(2e+1)². Moreover, we show that every tree with even order is not a-vertex consecutive magic and, if a tree of odd order is a-vertex consecutive then a=n-1. Furthermore, we show that every a-vertex consecutive magic graph has minimum degree at least two if a=0, or both and 2a?e, and the minimum degree is at least three if both and 2a?e. Finally, we state analogous results for b-edge consecutive magic graphs.     

Total Edge Irregularity Strength of Toroidal Fullerene

A toroidal fullerene (toroidal polyhex) is a cubic bipartite graph embedded on the torus such that each face is a hexagon. An edge irregular total k-labeling of a graph G is such a labeling of the vertices and edges with labels 1, 2, … , k that the weights of any two different edges are distinct, where the weight of an edge is the sum of the label of the edge itself and the labels of its two endvertices. The minimum k for which the graph G has an edge irregular total k-labeling is called the total edge irregularity strength, tes(G). In this paper we determine the exact value of the total edge irregularity strength of toroidal polyhexes.     

Convex Drawings of Planar Graphs and the Order Dimension of 3-Polytopes

We define an analogue of Schnyder's tree decompositions for 3-connected planar graphs. Based on this structure we obtain: Let G be a 3-connected planar graph with f faces, then G has a convex drawing with its vertices embedded on the (f–1)×(f–1) grid. Let G be a 3-connected planar graph. The dimension of the incidence order of vertices, edges and bounded faces of G is at most 3.The second result is originally due to Brightwell and Trotter. Here we give a substantially simpler proof.