Polymer/surfactant interactions at the air/water interface

The development of neutron reflectometry has transformed the study and understanding of polymer/surfactant mixtures at the air/water interface. A critical assessment of the results from this technique is made by comparing them with the information available from other techniques used to investigate adsorption at this interface. In the last few years, detailed information about the structure and composition of adsorbed layers has been obtained for a wide range of polymer/surfactant mixtures, including neutral polymers and synthetic and naturally occurring polyelectrolytes, with single surfactants or mixtures of surfactants. The use of neutron reflectometry together with surface tensiometry, has allowed the surface behaviour of these mixtures to be related directly to the bulk phase behaviour. We review the broad range of systems that have been studied, from neutral polymers with ionic surfactants to oppositely charged polyelectrolyte/ionic surfactant mixtures. A particular emphasis is placed upon the rich pattern of adsorption behaviour that is seen in oppositely charged polyelectrolyte/surfactant mixtures, much of which had not been reported previously. The strong surface interactions resulting from the electrostatic attractions in these systems have a very pronounced effect on both the surface tension behaviour and on adsorbed layers consisting of polymer/surfactant complexes, often giving rise to significant surface ordering.     

Polymer–surfactant interactions: neutron scattering and reflectivity

Recent studies of bulk and interfacial properties of polymer–surfactant systems using neutron scattering and neutron reflectivity are presented, with some discussions on a few selected systems. In bulk, the principal interests are centred on thermosensitive and hydrophobically modified associative polymers, where structural information has been used to interpret the effects of surfactants on the solubilization behavior, phase separation and gelation processes of these polymers. Conversely, the effects of polymers anchored in surfactant layers and membranes and the resulting phase changes in microemulsion systems have also received much interest. At the interface, information obtained on the structure and composition of mixed polymer–surfactant layers is discussed in relation to the surface tension and stability of these layers.     

Surface complexation of DNA with a cationic surfactant

We have studied the surface complexation of DNA with a cationic surfactant (DTAB) using a combination of methods: dynamic surface tension, ellipsometry and Brewster angle microscopy. Below the surfactant critical aggregation concentration (cac), complexation occurs only at the surface, and the results are consistent with neutralization of the surfactant charges by the free polymer ions. Above the cac, surfactant starts to bind cooperatively to DNA in the bulk, and adsorption of the preformed hydrophobic surfactant DNA aggregate is now possible, leading to thick surface layers. At still higher concentrations of surfactant (still below saturation of binding in the bulk), there is decrease in adsorption due to competition with bulk aggregates. Finally, as surfactant concentration is increased still further, bulk aggregates become less soluble and large amounts are adsorbed, forming a surface layer, which is solid-like and brittle.     

Interactions of quaternary ammonium salt-type gemini surfactants with sodium poly(styrene sulfonate)

The interactions of cationic gemini surfactants, 1,2-bis(alkyldimethylammonio)ethane dibromide (m-2-m: m is hydrocarbon chain length, m = 10 and 12), and an anionic polymer, sodium poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS), have been characterized by several techniques such as tensiometry, fluorescence spectroscopy, and dynamic light scattering. The surface tension of gemini surfactant/PSS mixed systems decreases with surfactant concentration, reaching break points, which are taken as critical aggregation concentrations (cac). The surface tension at the cac of mixtures is higher than that of single surfactants, and it is found that at concentrations above the cac, the surfactant molecules are associated with the polymer in the bulk. The 12-2-12/PSS mixed system shows higher surface activity than both 10-2-10/PSS and the monomeric surfactant of dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide/PSS systems. Fluorescence measurements of these mixed systems suggest the formation of a complex with a highly hydrophobic environment in the bulk of the solution. Additionally, dynamic light scattering measurements show that the hydrodynamic diameter of the 12-2-12/PSS mixed system is smaller than that of PSS only at low concentration, indicating interactions between surfactant and polymer. These result from the electrostatic attraction between ammonium and sulfate headgroups as well as the hydrophobic interaction between their hydrocarbon chains.     

Solution properties of hydrophobically modified acrylamide-based polysulfobetaines in the presence of surfactants

Polymer–surfactant interactions in aqueous solutions of a acrylamide-based, hydrophobically modified polysulfobetaine (ADS) containing 3-[N-(2-methacryloxylethyl)-N,N-dimethylammonio]-propane sulfonate and stearyl methylacrylate, with sodium dodedyl sulfate (SDS), N-dodecyl-N,N,N-trimethylammonium bromide (DTAB), and Triton X-100 were studied using surface tension, rheology, Rayleigh light scattering, and dynamic laser light scattering techniques. The purpose of this study was to highlight the influences of the surfactant structure and the nature of the surfactant head group on the polymer–surfactant interactions. The results show that the interaction and association between ADS and surfactants are distinctly varied depending on surfactant type and surfactant concentration. SDS produced the strongest interactions with ADS, while DTAB and Triton X-100 interact with ADS to a lesser degree, which is attributed to surfactant structure and the nature of the surfactant head group. For SDS and DTAB, there are two driving forces for the complexation of the polymer and surfactants, resulting from the electrostatic interaction and the hydrophobic association. However, for the nonionic surfactant Triton X-100, only hydrophobic association predominated in the interaction between ADS and the surfactant. The mechanism and reconstruction of the polymer–surfactant complexes have been evaluated and discussed.     

Complexation behaviour of cellulose derivative/surfactant mixtures investigated by nonlinear enhanced Rayleigh scattering

Complexation behaviour of cellulose derivative/surfactant mixtures in aqueous solution was investigated by nonlinear enhanced Rayleigh scattering (NERS). The NERS spectra of polymer solutions, including second-order scattering, third-order scattering, frequency doubling scattering and triplet frequency scattering were created using by spectrofluorometer. The results indicated that NERS intensity of cellulose derivative/surfactant systems changes differently with continuing addition of surfactant due to the complexation between cellulose derivative and surfactant. The critical micelle concentration of cellulose derivatives/surfactants system is easy to obtain. The change of NERS intensity reveals the complexation behaviour of cellulose derivative/surfactant and the aggregation state of polymer chains in evidence. Therefore, NERS had been successfully developed to study complexation behaviour of cellulose derivative/surfactant mixtures in solution.     

Co-adsorption of carboxymethyl-cellulose and cationic surfactants at the air-water interface

We investigated the interaction between an anionic polyelectrolyte (carboxymethylcellulose) and cationic surfactants (DTAB, TTAB, and CTAB) at the air/water interface, using surface tension, ellipsometry, and Brewster angle microscopy techniques. At low surfactant concentration, a synergistic phenomenon is observed due to the co-adsorption of polyelectrolyte/surfactant complexes at the interface, which decreases the surface tension. When the surfactant critical aggregation concentration (cac) is reached, the adsorption saturates and the thickness of the adsorbed monolayer remains constant until another characteristic surfactant concentration, C0, is reached, at which all the polymer charges are bound to surfactant in bulk. Above C0, the absorbed monolayer becomes much thicker, suggesting adsorption of bulk aggregates, which have become more hydrophobic due to charge neutralization.     

Which surfactants reduce surface tension faster? A scaling argument for diffusion-controlled adsorption

Consider the example of surfactant adsorbing from an infinite solution to a freshly formed planar interface. There is an implicit length scale in this problem, the adsorption depth h, which is the depth depleted to supply the interface with the absorbed surfactant. From a mass balance, h can be shown to be the ratio of the equilibrium surface concentration gamma eq to the bulk concentration C infinity. The characteristic time scale for diffusion to the interface is tau D = h2/D, where D is the diffusivity of the surfactant in solution. The significance of this time scale is demonstrated by numerically integrating the equations governing diffusion-controlled adsorption to a planar interface. The surface tension equilibrates within 1-10 times tau D regardless of bulk concentration, even for surfactants with strong interactions. Dynamic surface tension data obtained by pendant bubble method are rescaled using tau D to scale time. For high enough bulk concentrations, the re-normalized surface tension evolutions nearly superpose, demonstrating that tau D is indeed the relevant time scale for this process. Surface tension evolutions for a variety of surfactants are compared. Those with the smallest values for tau D equilibrate fastest. Since diffusion coefficients vary only weakly for surfactants of similar size, the differences in the equilibration times for various surfactant solutions can be attributed to their differing adsorption depths. These depth are determined by the equilibrium adsorption isotherms, allowing tau D to be calculated a priori from equilibrium surface tension data, and surfactant solutions to be sorted in terms of which will reduce the surface tension more rapidly. Finally, trends predicted by tau D to gauge what surfactant properties are required for rapid surface tension reduction are discussed. These trends are shown to be in agreement with guiding principles that have been suggested from prior structure-property studies.     

Macroscopic modeling of the surface tension of polymer-surfactant systems

Polymer-surfactant mixtures are increasingly being used in a wide range of applications. Weakly interacting systems, such as SDS/PEO and SDS/PVP, comprise ionic surfactants and neutral polymers, while strongly interacting systems, such as SDS/POLYDMDAAC and C12TAB/NaPSS, comprise ionic surfactants and oppositely charged ionic polymers. The complex nature of interactions in the mixtures leads to interesting and surprising surface tension profiles as the concentrations of polymer and surfactant are varied. The purpose of our research has been to develop a model to explain these surface tension profiles and to understand how they relate to the formation of different complexes in the bulk solution. In this paper we show how an existing model based on the law of mass action can be extended to model the surface tension of weakly interacting systems, and we also extend it further to produce a model for the surface tension of strongly interacting systems. Applying the model to a variety of strongly interacting systems gives remarkable agreement with the experimental results. The model provides a sound theoretical basis for comparing and contrasting the behavior of different systems and greatly enhances our understanding of the features observed.     

Interaction between polymer and anionic/nonionic surfactants and its mechanism of enhanced oil recovery

Various experimental methods were used to investigate interaction between polymer and anionic/nonionic surfactants and mechanisms of enhanced oil recovery by anionic/nonionic surfactants in the present paper. The complex surfactant molecules are adsorbed in the mixed micelles or aggregates formed by the hydrophobic association of hydrophobic groups of polymers, making the surfactant molecules at oil-water interface reduce and the value of interfacial tension between oil and water increase. A dense spatial network structure is formed by the interaction between the mixed aggregates and hydrophobic groups of the polymer molecular chains, making the hydrodynamic volume of the aggregates and the viscosity of the polymer solution increase. Because of the formation of the mixed adsorption layer at oil and water interface by synergistic effect, ultra-low interfacial tension (～2.0?×?10^?3 mN/m) can be achieved between the novel surfactant system and the oil samples in this paper. Because of hydrophobic interaction, wettability alteration of oil-wet surface was induced by the adsorption of the surfactant system on the solid surface. Moreover, the studied surfactant system had a certain degree of spontaneous emulsification ability (D50?=?25.04?µm) and was well emulsified with crude oil after the mechanical oscillation (D50?=?4.27?µm).     

Transient Surface Tension of an Expanding Liquid Sheet

We address the problem of dynamic surface tension using measurements of sheet diameters that results from the impact of a liquid jet of diameter d(0) on a small disk of diameter d(i) (d(i)/d(0) approximately 4). At low velocities, the sheet diameter D is related to d(0) by the Weber number We, constructed with the liquid density rho, the jet velocity u(0), and the surface tension sigma at the rim: D/d(0)=18 We=18 [rho u(0)(2)/(sigma/d(0))]. This relation expresses the equilibrium between inertial forces and surface tension forces at the sheet rim. When a surfactant has been dissolved in the bulk of the liquid prior to the formation of the initial jet, the rim surface tension, and therefore the sheet diameter, depends on the amount of surfactant adsorbed at the rim. This amount is fixed by a competition between surface formation induced by radial extension and repopulation of the liquid interface in surfactant. The experimental setup proposed here provides a method to measure dynamic surface tension from sheet diameter measurements and symmetrically to monitor the adsorption of a surfactant on a liquid surface. The available adsorption time ranges from 10 to 100 ms. Experimental data obtained with two surfactants are in agreement with a model of a diffusion-controlled adsorption at the interface. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.     

Dilational properties of gemini surfactant/polymer systems at the air–water surface

The surface properties of mixed system containing gemini anionic surfactant 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic sodium, 2,3-didodecyl ester and partly hydrolyzed polyacrylamide were investigated by surface tension measurements and oscillating bubble methods. The influences of surfactant concentration, dilational frequency, temperature, pH, as well as salts on dilational modulus were explored. Meanwhile, the interfacial tension relaxation method was employed to obtain the characteristic time of surface relaxation process. The polymers play important roles in changing the interfacial properties especially at lower surfactant concentration. The possible mechanism of the polymer in changing the interfacial properties is proposed. Both the hydrophobic and electrostatic interaction among the surfactants and polymers dominate the surface properties of mixed system. These dynamic properties are of fundamental interest in understanding the structure of adsorption layers, dynamics of surfactant molecules, and their interaction with polymers at the surface.     

Adsorption/aggregation of surfactants and their mixtures at solid-liquid interfaces

Adsorption of surfactants and polymers at solid-liquid interfaces is used widely to modify interfacial properties in a variety of industrial processes such as flotation, ceramic processing, flocculation/dispersion, personal care product formulation and enhanced oil recovery. The behavior of surfactants and polymers at interfaces is determined by a number of forces, including electrostatic attraction, covalent bonding, hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic bonding, and solvation and desolvation of various species. The extent and type of the forces involved varies depending on the adsorbate and the adsorbent, and also the composition and other characteristics of the solvent and dissolved components in it. The influence of such forces on the adsorption behavior is reviewed here from a thermodynamics point of view. The experimental results from microcalorimetric and spectroscopic studies of adsorbed layers of different surfactant and polymer systems at solid-liquid interfaces are also presented. Calorimetric data from the adsorption of an anionic surfactant, sodium octylbenzenesulfonate, and a non-ionic surfactant, dodecyloxyheptaethoxyethylalcohol, and their mixtures on alumina, yielded important thermodynamic information. It was found that the adsorption of anionic surfactants alone on alumina was initially highly exothermic due to the electrostatic interaction with the substrate. Further adsorption leading to a solloid (hemimicelle) formation is proposed to be mainly an entropy-driven process. The entropy effect was found to be more pronounced for the adsorption of anionic-non-ionic surfactant mixtures than for the anionic surfactant alone. Fluorescence studies using a pyrene probe on an adsorbed surfactant and polymer layers, along with electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy, reveal the role of surface aggregation and the conformation of the adsorbed molecules in controlling the dispersion and wettability of the system.     

选择性膜电极研究表面活性剂与大分子的相互作用

结合本实验室的工作介绍了表面活性剂选择性膜电极研究表面活性剂与大分子相互作用的实验装置和原理,并综述了表面活性剂选择性膜电极在研究离子型表面活性剂及其二元混合体系与不同类型大分子之间相互作用中的应用.讨论了大分子的分子量、外加盐和表面活性剂的结构对表面活性剂和大分子之间相互作用的影响结果.     

Polymer-surfactant Interactions

Aqueous solutions containing poly(vinyl-pyrrolidone) and sodium caprylate, or poly(vinyl-pyrrolidone) and tetraethylammonium perfluorooctanesulfonate,respectively, have been investigated by volumetric, ionic conductivity and surface tension methods. The presence of an interaction region has been determined from conductivity and surface tension. The width of such a region depends on the amount of polymer in the mixture,temperature, surfactant content and added electrolyte (NaCl). The observed behaviour was explained in terms of the combined effects played by the alkyl-chain hydophobicity, polar head group(s) and counter-ions. An approximate solution to a mass action model for the binding of surfactants onto polymers has been introduced. It allows determining the width of the interaction region as a function of polymer mass percent in the mixture. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Foam, emulsion and wetting films stabilized by polyoxyalkylated diethylenetriamine (DETA) polymeric surfactants

This review explores three (A, B, C) polyoxyalkylated diethylenetriamine (DETA) polymeric surfactants belonging to the group of star-like polymers. They have a similar structure, differing only in the number of polymeric branches (4, 6 and 9 in the mentioned order). The differences in these surfactants' ability to stabilize foam, o/w/o and w/o/w emulsion and wetting films are evaluated by a number of methods summarized in Section 2. Results from the studies indicate that differences in polymeric surfactants' molecular structure affect the properties exhibited at air/water, oil/water and water/solid interfaces, such as the value of surface tension, interfacial tension, critical micelle concentration, degree of hydrophobicity of solid surface, etc. Foam, emulsion and wetting films stabilized by such surfactants also show different behavior regarding some specific parameters, such as critical electrolyte concentration, surfactant concentration for obtaining a stable film, film thickness value, etc. These observations give reasons to believe that model studies can support a comprehensive understanding of how the change in polymeric surfactant structure can impact thin liquid films properties. This may enable a targeted design of the macromolecular architecture depending on the polymeric surfactants application purpose.     

Foaming and foam stability for mixed polymer-surfactant solutions: effects of surfactant type and polymer charge

Solutions of surfactant-polymer mixtures often exhibit different foaming properties, compared to the solutions of the individual components, due to the strong tendency for formation of polymer-surfactant complexes in the bulk and on the surface of the mixed solutions. A generally shared view in the literature is that electrostatic interactions govern the formation of these complexes, for example between anionic surfactants and cationic polymers. In this study we combine foam tests with model experiments to evaluate and explain the effect of several polymer-surfactant mixtures on the foaminess and foam stability of the respective solutions. Anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants (SDS, C(12)TAB, and C(12)EO(23)) were studied to clarify the role of surfactant charge. Highly hydrophilic cationic and nonionic polymers (polyvinylamine and polyvinylformamide, respectivey) were chosen to eliminate the (more trivial) effect of direct hydrophobic interactions between the surfactant tails and the hydrophobic regions on the polymer chains. Our experiments showed clearly that the presence of opposite charges is not a necessary condition for boosting the foaminess and foam stability in the surfactant-polymer mixtures studied. Clear foam boosting (synergistic) effects were observed in the mixtures of cationic surfactant and cationic polymer, cationic surfactant and nonionic polymer, and anionic surfactant and nonionic polymer. The mixtures of anionic surfactant and cationic polymer showed improved foam stability, however, the foaminess was strongly reduced, as compared to the surfactant solutions without polymer. No significant synergistic or antagonistic effects were observed for the mixture of nonionic surfactant (with low critical micelle concentration) and nonionic polymer. The results from the model experiments allowed us to explain the observed trends by the different adsorption dynamics and complex formation pattern in the systems studied.     

On the influence of surfactants on the adsorption of polysaccharide-based polymers on cotton studied by means of fluorescence spectroscopy

In this study, we examined the influence of surfactants on the adsorption of polymers on cotton fibers. The extent of polymer adsorption on cotton was determined directly by means of fluorescence spectroscopy using fluorescently labeled polymers. The investigation of polymer adsorption in the presence of different types of surfactants and for a large range of differently structured polymers allows us to obtain a rather general picture of this important issue. Systematic relationships between the presence of surfactant and the type of polymer can be deduced but cannot be cast in simple terms such as electrostatic interaction but instead depend on the detailed interaction between the surfactant and polymer both in solution and adsorbed on the cotton surface. A particularly complex situation arises for the case of oppositely charged surfactant and polymer because of the possibility of precipitate formation. The study of such complex systems not only is of scientific interest but also is of great commercial interest because both polymers and surfactants are parts of detergent formulations and cotton is one of the most abundantly used materials for fabrics.     

Disjoining pressure,contact angles and line tension in free thin liquid films

Three are the main thermodynamic quantities which characterize the physical behaviour of the thin liquid films: the disjoining pressure, the macroscopic contact angle between the film and its adjacent bulk liquid phase, and the line tension of the film contact perimeter. All these quantities manifest the action of the long-range interaction surface forces which take place in any small capillary system. The rigorous introduction of such quantities is closely related to the Gibbs concept of surface of tension. For the case of a thin plane parallel liquid film there exist three surfaces of tension. By making use of them the thickness of the film would also be defined. There are several experimental methods for determining the tension of film, the contact angles. the line tension. Some important details of these methods. some experimental results together with important features of the thermodynamic theory of the thin liquid films are the subject of the present paper.     

Interfacial microgels formed by oppositely charged polyelectrolytes and surfactants. 1. Influence of polyelectrolyte molecular weight

The synergistic adsorption and complexation of polystyrene sulfonate, PSS (a highly charged anionic polyelectrolyte), and dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide, C12TAB (a cationic surfactant), at the air-water interface can lead to interfacial gels that strongly influence foam-film drainage and stability. The formation and characteristics of these gels have been studied as a function of PSS molecular weight by combining surface tension, ellipsometry, and foam-film drainage experiments. Simultaneously the solution electromotive force has been measured to track the polymer-surfactant interactions in the bulk solution. It has been found that there is a critical molecular weight for surface gelation as well as for bulk precipitation and aggregation. Furthermore, we show that for the lowest molecular weights, PSS adsorbs with C12TAB in compact layers at the air-water interface. In particular, for mixtures of C12TAB with the monomer compound of the PSS repeat unit (e.g. Mw = 208), interfacial complexation is found to be similar to that of catanionic mixtures (mixtures of surfactants of opposite charge).