Volatile sulfur compounds in Cheddar cheese determined by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatograph-pulsed flame photometric detection

The aim of this study was to develop a methodology for the analysis of volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) in Cheddar cheese. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was employed to extract VSCs from the cheese matrix using a CAR-PDMS fiber. This extraction method was combined with gas chromatography-pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD) to achieve high sensitivity for sulfur compounds. The impact of extraction parameters, including time, temperature and sample size, was evaluated to determine the best conditions to analyze sulfur compounds in Cheddar cheese. Hydrogen sulfide, methanethiol, and dimethyl sulfide were found to constitute the majority of the overall sulfur profile while dimethyl disulfide and dimethyl trisulfide were present in lesser amounts. Artifact formation of volatile sulfur compounds was found to be minimal. Two commercial cheese samples were analyzed and differences in sulfur content were observed. Overall, SPME-GC-PFPD was found to be a highly sensitive technique for the analysis of sulfur compounds in Cheddar cheese.     

Development of a quantification method for the analysis of malodorous sulphur compounds in gaseous industrial effluents by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-pulsed flame photometric detection

A quantification method for malodorous sulphur compounds in gaseous industrial effluents using solid-phase microextraction sampling followed by gas chromatography-pulsed flame photometric detection has been developed. A comparative study showed that polydimethylsiloxane-Carboxen fibre led to sufficient sensitivity to achieve the microg m(-3) human perception levels of the five analytes studied (hydrogen sulphide, methanethiol, ethanethiol, dimethyl sulphide, dimethyl disulphide). However, this coating is known to suffer from competitive adsorption, which may lead to inaccurate quantification. Therefore, external calibration can only be used under a limited range of concentrations, which were determined from Fick's diffusion law. This approach was tested on a real gaseous sample and compared with the standard addition method. Good correlations were found for ethanethiol, dimethyl sulphide and dimethyl disulphide. However, for more volatile sulphur compounds (i.e., hydrogen sulphide and methanethiol), the easy-to-use external calibration could not be applied and standard additions had to be performed for accurate quantification.     

Determination of sulphur compounds in beer using headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatographic analysis with pulsed flame photometric detection

A simple and sensitive method for the analysis of volatile and semi-volatile sulphur compounds in beer at trace levels was developed using headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection. Different SPME fibres were tested and a Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane coated fibre was found to be the most appropriate. The adsorption and desorption conditions were optimised. The effect of ethanol concentration in the sample on the extraction of analytes was examined. A 60 m non-polar capillary column preceded by a 10 m length of a polar column was found to be capable of separating a wide range of C1-C6 sulphur compounds. The pulsed flame photometric detector enabled increased sensitivity to be obtained over previous methods, such as dynamic headspace followed by conventional flame photometric detection or sulphur chemiluminescent detection, with high sulphur selectivity. Two sulphur compounds, 2-methyl-1-butanethiol and 3-methylthiophene, were identified in beer for the first time.     

Quantitative determination of wine highly volatile sulfur compounds by using automated headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-pulsed flame photometric detection. Critical study and optimization of a new procedure

The quantitative determination of wine volatile sulfur compounds by automated headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) with a carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (CAR-PDMS) fiber and subsequent gas chromatography-pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD) has been evaluated. The direct extraction of the sulfur compounds in 5 ml of wine has been found to suffer from matrix effects and short linear ranges, problems which could not be solved by the use of different internal standards or by multiple headspace SPME. These problems were attributed to saturation of the fiber and to competitive effects between analytes, internal standards and other wine volatiles. Another problem was the oxidation of analytes during the procedure. The reduction in sample volume by a factor 50 (0.1 ml diluted with water or brine) brought about a reduction in the amount of sulfur compounds taken in the fiber by a factor just 3.3. Consequently, a new procedure has been proposed. In a sealed vial containing 4.9 ml of saturated NaCl brine, the air is thoroughly displaced with nitrogen, and the wine (0.1 ml) and the internal standards (0.02 ml) are further introduced with a syringe through the vial septum. This sample is extracted at 35 degrees C for 20 min. This procedure makes a satisfactory determination possible of hydrogen sulfide, methanethiol, ethanethiol, dimethyl sulfide, diethyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide. The linear dynamic ranges cover the normal ranges of occurrence of these analytes in wine with typical r2 between 0.9823 and 0.9980. Reproducibility in real samples ranges from 10 to 20% and repeatability is better than 10% in most cases. The method accuracy is satisfactory, with errors below 20% for hydrogen sulfide and mostly below 10% for the other compounds. The proposed method has been applied to the analysis of 34 Spanish wines.     

Comparison of headspace and direct single-drop microextraction and headspace solid-phase microextraction for the measurement of volatile sulfur compounds in beer and beverage by gas chromatography with flame photometric detection

Three approaches based on headspace single-drop microextraction (HS-SDME), direct single-drop microextraction (Direct-SDME), and headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME), have been compared for analyzing volatile sulphur compounds (VSCs) in beer and beverage. Procedures and performance of the three methods have been contrasted through the determination of extraction efficiencies, precision, linearity and limits of detection. The overall process of HS-SDME and HS-SPME was applied to GC-FPD determination of five VSCs in beer and beverage.     

Rapid determination of organotin compounds by headspace solid-phase microextraction

Headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) followed by gas chromatography (GC) coupled to pulsed flame photometric detection have been investigated for the simultaneous speciation analysis of 14 organotin compounds, including methyl-, butyl-, phenyl-, and octyltins compounds. The analytical process (sorption on SPME fibre and thermal desorption in GC injection port) has been optimised using experimental designs. Six operating factors were considered in order to evaluate their influence on the performances of a SPME-based procedure. The evaluation of accuracy, precision and limits of detection (LODs) according to ISO standards and IUPAC recommendations has allowed the method to be validated. The LODs obtained for the 14 studied organotins compounds are widely sub-ng(Sn) l(-1). The precision evaluated using relative standard deviation ranges between 9 and 25% from five determinations of the analytes at 0.25-125 ng(Sn) l(-1) concentrations. The accuracy was studied throughout the analysis of spiked environmental samples. These first results show that headspace SPME appears really as attractive for organotins determination in the environment and the monitoring of their biogeochemical cycle.     

Determination of lewisite oxide in soil using solid-phase microextraction followed by gas chromatography with flame photometric or mass spectrometric detection

A rapid, sensitive, and convenient method is described for determining Lewisite oxide in soil. Samples are initially fortified with phenylarsine oxide (surrogate), then both species are extracted using ascorbic acid solutions containing 1,3-propanedithiol (derivatizing reagent). The corresponding filtered supernatant is sampled using a solid-phase microextraction fiber. Collected analytes are thermally desorbed in a heated gas chromatographic inlet, separated using fused-silica capillary columns ("primary" and "confirmatory"), and detected with either a mass spectrometric (selected ion monitoring mode) or flame photometric (sulfur-selective mode) detector. Two independent statistically-unbiased procedures were used to evaluate the detection limit for Lewisite oxide; the values range between 0.1 and 0.5 microg g(-1) soil.     

Determination of organotin compounds (OTC) at low levels in seawater by solid-phase extraction (SPE) and gas chromatography-pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD)

In this work, a simple, sensitive and affordable analytical method for the simultaneous determination of nine organotin compounds (butyltins, phenyltins and methyltins) in seawater using solid-phase extraction (SPE) and gas chromatography-pulsed flame photometric detection was developed and validated. The performance of three different SPE cartridges (Envi C₁₈, Oasis HLB and Oasis MCX) and three elution solvents of different polarity (hexane, methanol and acetonitrile) was evaluated. The extraction parameters, such as solvent volume, presence of complexing and ion-pairing reagents, sample volume and pH and breakthrough volume, were also investigated. Tributyltin, as the organotin compound of special interest, was efficiently extracted using any of the cartridges and solvents tested. However, the simultaneous extraction of all nine organotin compounds was the most efficient using reversed-phase Envi C₁₈ cartridge and 0.1% (w/v) tropolone in methanol as eluent. The optimised method resulted in good recovery, precision and linearity for all compounds, particularly for tri- and disubstituted species. Method detection limits ranged from 0.22 to 1.27 ng(Sn) L^?1 for butyltins, 0.37 to 4.91 ng(Sn) L^?1 for phenyltins and 0.45 to 1.16 ng(Sn) L^?1 for methyltins. The accuracy of butyltins determination was further verified by the comparison with purchased derivatised standards. The developed method was successfully applied to the environmental samples.     

Organotin speciation in French brandies and wines by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography--pulsed flame photometric detection

An analytical method devoted to organotin compounds (OTC) determination in brandy and wine was developed. It is based on solid-phase microextraction (SPME) of ethylated organotins. The following operating factors were examined: SPME mode/nature of fibre coating, sample volume/dilution, and sampling time. The optimisation work led to dilute the sample in an aqueous buffer (1/11, v/v ratio) in order to satisfactorily decrease the matrix effects due to competitive sorption of non-OTC species onto/into fibre coating. The optimised operating conditions consist of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) coated fibre used in headspace mode for 30 min. In wines, the limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) ranged from 1 to 40 and 3 to 80 ng(Sn)L(-1) respectively, according to the species. The analytical validation was made by evaluating the accuracy of OTC determination in spiked samples with various concentrations over the whole calibration range, i.e. from LOQ to 1000 ng(Sn)L(-1). Recovery was around 80-110% and precision (relative standard deviation, RSD) was between 12% and 25%. Despite the presence of two chromatographic peaks corresponding to sulphur compounds during brandy analysis, the selectivity of the method is adequate. The analysis confirmed the analytical performances and applicability of the method to wine and brandy samples. The obtained results emphasise the contamination of brandy and wine by organotins, the storage in plastic container seeming to be confirmed as the main OTC source.     

Identification of sulfur interferences during organotin determination in harbour sediment samples by sodium tetraethyl borate ethylation and gas chromatography-pulsed flame photometric detection

Because of the high toxicity of organotin compounds and the current regulation about their applications, analytical method usable in routine analysis is required. A speciation procedure based on NaBEt4 ethylation and GC-PFPD analysis has shown to be suitable for the organotin determination. Unfortunately, some matrix effects were observed during the analysis of harbour sediments from Chile. These effects were identified as the alkylation of elemental sulfur and the coelution between the organotin compounds and some dialkylsulfides. The re-optimization of GC parameters and application of solid phase microextraction (SPME) were proposed to solve these analytical problems. Certified reference materials and different harbour sediment samples were analysed in order to evaluate the suitability of the methods for organotin control in complex environment samples.     

Optimization of headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-atomic emission detection analysis of monomethylmercury

Optimum conditions for headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) in the analysis of monomethylmercury (MeHg) have been determined. Sodium tetra(n-)propylborate (NaBPr(4)) is used as derivatization reagent to promote volatility. A simple aluminium bar was used to cool the SPME fiber to about 2 degrees C during the equilibration phase just before extraction. HS-SPME was performed using different fibers. The 100 microm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and 65 microm polydimethylsiloxane-divinylbenzene (PDMS-DVB) fibers showed the best results. Although the extraction efficiency for MeHg derivative of the polydimethylsiloxane-Carboxen (PDMS-CAR) fiber is similar to the other fibers, desorption of MeHg derivative from a PDMS-CAR fiber is poor. Factors affecting the HS-SPME process such as adsorption and desorption times, ionic strength (salting-out) and extraction temperature have been evaluated and optimized thoroughly. The highest extraction efficiency for the PDMS fiber was obtained by extraction at a low temperature (2 degrees C) immediately after equilibration at 30 degrees C. With the PDMS-DVB and PDMS-CAR fiber improvement of extraction efficiency at lower temperatures is negligible. Repeated extraction out of the same vial revealed that about 30% of MeHg derivative is extracted from the headspace with a PDMS fiber at 2 degrees C and about 70% with a PDMS-DVB fiber. Repeated extraction with two different fiber coatings showed that the PDMS-CAR fiber also extracts about 70% but that the desorption is incomplete. Attempts to improve the desorption failed due to degradation of the MeHg derivate at high injection temperatures. The limit of detection (3sigma) was 16 pg/L MeHg. The relative standard deviation (n = 8) for 100 pg/L of MeHg was found to be 5%. Linearity of the HS-SPME-GC-atomic emission detection method was established over at least two orders of magnitude in the range 0-2000 pg/L. Recovery of a surface water sample spiked at 2 ng/L was 85%. The suitability of the procedure was demonstrated by analysis of a surface water sample that showed a concentration of 100 pg/L MeHg. The optimized method can be used with standard commercial equipment without further adaptations.     

Determination of ethylphenol compounds in wine by headspace solid-phase microextraction in conjunction with gas chromatography and flame ionization detection

Headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) was investigated as a solvent-free alternative method for the extraction and determination of 4-ethylphenol (EP) and 4-ethylguaiacol (EG) in red wine by capillary gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (FID) and compared to liquid-liquid extraction.For HS-SPME, better results were obtained with saturated sodium chloride samples, at 55 °C, using a 85 μm polyacrylate fiber. An absorption time of 40 min was needed to reach the absorption equilibrium for EG. This 40-min duration corresponds to the beginning of EP equilibrium and was selected for the experiments. In these conditions, the calibration graphs were linear in the range 5-5000 μg l⁻¹ and the sensitivity was nearly the same for the two compounds. The detection limits were in the low μg l⁻¹ range. In model wine solutions, result obtained with the liquid-liquid extraction method exhibit a linear calibration between 25 and 10,000 μg l⁻¹ with a detection limit of 1 μg l⁻¹, but, the relative standard deviations of the EP and EG result in the low concentration range (<50 μg l⁻¹) are higher than those obtained by HS-SPME (15% compared to 2% for EP and 12% compared to 5% for EG). Taking into account the numerous volatile compounds in wine, HS-SPME is a rapid and valid alternative technique for use in the determination of ethylphenols at trace levels.     

Determination of chlorophenols in soil samples by microwave-assisted extraction coupled to headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-electron-capture detection

Microwave-assisted extraction coupled to headspace solid-phase microextraction was studied and applied for one-step in-situ sample preparation prior to analysis of chlorophenols (CPs) in soil samples. The CPs in soil sample were extracted into the aqueous solution and then directly onto the solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fiber in headspace under the aid of microwave irradiation. After being desorbed from SPME fiber in the GC injection port, CPs were analyzed with a GC-electron-capture detection system. Parameters affecting the extraction efficiency such as the extraction solutions, the pH in the slurry, the humic acid content in the soil, the power and the irradiation time of microwave as well as the desorption parameters were investigated. Experimental results indicated that the extraction of a 1.0 g soil sample with a 6-ml aqueous solution (pH 2) and a polyacrylate fiber under the medium-power irradiation (132 W) for 9 min achieved the best extraction efficiency of about 90% recovery and less than 10% RSD. Desorption was optimal at 300 degrees C for 3 min. Detection limits were obtained at around 0.1-2.0 microg/kg levels. The proposed method provided a simple, fast, and organic solvent-free procedure to analyze CPs from soil sample matrix.     

Analysis of sulfur-containing compounds in ambient air using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection

A new analysis method for sulfur-containing compounds in air using solid-phase microextraction (SPME), gas chromatography and pulsed flame photometric detection (PFPD), SPME-GC-PFPD method, has been developed. The analysis method is simple, fast and easily performed. To demonstrate the usefulness and versatility of the method air samples collected in geothermal areas in Rotorua, at a muddy beach in Auckland (cities in New Zealand), and in a wastewater treatment plant were analysed. COS, H₂S, CS₂, SO₂, CH₃SH, (CH₃)₂S and CH₃(CH₂)₂CH₂SH were identified in the samples from Rotorua. It was noted that air quality in residential areas with respect to sulfur compounds was better than that around geothermal sources. Samples from the wastewater treatment plant contained COS, H₂S, CS₂, SO₂, CH₃SH, (CH₃)₂S and (CH₃)₂S₂. It was found that the emission of sulfur compounds was reduced in the course of the wastewater treatment process. The potential impact of the detected sulfur compounds on human health is briefly discussed.     

Determination of 2,4,6-trichloroanisole in wines by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-electron-capture detection

The retention behaviour of alkaline earth cations was studied as a function of changing composition of acidified ethylenediamine eluent. The multiple eluent species retention model developed for separation of calcium, magnesium and strontium ions was utilized for determination of selectivity coefficients for sample and eluent ions. The suggested model accurately describes and predicts retention of analytes under elution conditions [0.5-2.0 mM C2H4(NH2)2 and pH 4-6] which are of practical importance. The results in three-dimensional retention surface with species distribution graphs are demonstrated. Complexometric titrations and ion chromatography (IC) were compared for the analysis of calcium and magnesium ions. Statistical data indicated that there was no evidence for relative differences between the two methods. However, IC gives several advantages over volumetric method.     

Determination of organophosphorus pesticides in soil by headspace solid-phase microextraction

Headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has been developed for the analysis of common organophosphorus pesticides in soil. Factors such as adsorption-time, sampling temperature and matrix modification by addition of water were carefully considered to optimize the extraction efficiency. This technique could achieve limits of detection of 143 ng/g for Malathion and Parathion, and 28.6 ng/g for Phorate, Diazinon and Disulfoton in humic soil when the extracted sample was analyzed by gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID). Lower limits of detection of 28.6 ng/g for Malathion and Parathion, and 14.3 ng/g for Phorate, Diazinon and Disulfoton can be achieved by analyzing the extracted sample with gas chromatography/mass spectrometric detector (GC/MS). As the extraction efficiency was generally better when analyzing sandy soil, the limits of detection are envisaged to be even better for such a matrix. The technique was found to be reliable with good precision of about 6.5% RSD for the sandy soil and about 15% for the humic material. The poorer precision of extraction from the humic material is probably related to the poorer homogeneity of this material. The linearity of extraction was good with linear calibration in the range of 0.143 to 28.6 μg/g. Finally, headspace SPME was compared to aqueous extraction of soil followed by SPME (LE-SPME). The recoveries obtained by headspace SPME were comparable to those from liquid-liquid extraction of soil followed by SPME. However, the analysis of headspace SPME has less background interference. Perhaps, the greatest advantage of this technique is its non-destructive nature so that it is possible to perform further laboratory analysis of the samples after headspace SPME has been carried out.     

Determination of organophosphorus pesticides in soil by headspace solid-phase microextraction

Headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has been developed for the analysis of common organophosphorus pesticides in soil. Factors such as adsorption-time, sampling temperature and matrix modification by addition of water were carefully considered to optimize the extraction efficiency. This technique could achieve limits of detection of 143 ng/g for Malathion and Parathion, and 28.6 ng/g for Phorate, Diazinon and Disulfoton in humic soil when the extracted sample was analyzed by gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID). Lower limits of detection of 28.6 ng/g for Malathion and Parathion, and 14.3 ng/g for Phorate, Diazinon and Disulfoton can be achieved by analyzing the extracted sample with gas chromatography/mass spectrometric detector (GC/MS). As the extraction efficiency was generally better when analyzing sandy soil, the limits of detection are envisaged to be even better for such a matrix. The technique was found to be reliable with good precision of about 6.5% RSD for the sandy soil and about 15% for the humic material. The poorer precision of extraction from the humic material is probably related to the poorer homogeneity of this material. The linearity of extraction was good with linear calibration in the range of 0.143 to 28.6 μg/g. Finally, headspace SPME was compared to aqueous extraction of soil followed by SPME (LE-SPME). The recoveries obtained by headspace SPME were comparable to those from liquid-liquid extraction of soil followed by SPME. However, the analysis of headspace SPME has less background interference. Perhaps, the greatest advantage of this technique is its non-destructive nature so that it is possible to perform further laboratory analysis of the samples after headspace SPME has been carried out. Received: 13 July 1998 / Revised: 10 November 1998 / Accepted: 17 November 1998     

Determination of volatile residual solvents in traditional Chinese medicines by headspace solid-phase microextraction and cryogenic gas chromatography with flame ionization detection

A method based on headspace solid-phase microextraction and cryogenic gas chromatography with flame ionization detection was developed for the determination of volatile residual solvents in traditional Chinese medicines. A laboratory-made cryogenic chromatographic system was used for the separation of 15 kinds of residual solvents. During the analysis, a 65 microm PDMS/DVB fiber was used to extract the residual solvents, the extraction time was controlled at 0 degrees C for 15 min, and the NaCl content of the sample was maintained at 30%. The limits of detection ranged from 0.08 (for octane) to 5000 microg/L (for ethanol), and the relative standard deviations were < 8%. The recoveries from spiked samples ranged from 88 to 112%. Trace levels of residual solvents in several traditional Chinese medicines were effectively identified and quantified.     

Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous samples by microwave assisted headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography/flame ionization detection

The novel pretreatment technique, microwave-assisted heating coupled to headspace solid-phase microextraction (MA-HS-SPME) has been studied for one-step in situ sample preparation for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in aqueous samples before gas chromatography/flame ionization detection (GC/FID). The PAHs evaporated into headspace with the water by microwave irradiation, and absorbed directly on a SPME fiber in the headspace. After being desorbed from the SPME fiber in the GC injection port, PAHs were analyzed by GC/FID. Parameters affecting extraction efficiency, such as SPME fiber coating, adsorption temperature, microwave power and irradiation time, and desorption conditions were investigated.Experimental results indicated that extraction of 20 mL aqueous sample containing PAHs at optional pH, by microwave irradiation with effective power 145 W for 30 min (the same as the extraction time), and collection with a 65 μm PDMS/DVB fiber at 20 °C circular cooling water to control sampling temperature, resulted in the best extraction efficiency. Optimum desorption of PAHs from the SPME fiber in the GC hot injection port was achieved at 290 °C for 5 min. The method was developed using spiked water sample such as field water with a range of 0.1-200 μg/L PAHs. Detection limits varied from 0.03 to 1.0 μg/L for different PAHs based on S/N = 3 and the relative standard deviations for repeatability were <13%. A real sample was collected from the scrubber water of an incineration system. PAHs of two to three rings were measured with concentrations varied from 0.35 to 7.53 μg/L. Recovery was more than 88% and R.S.D. was less than 17%. The proposed method is a simple, rapid, and organic solvent-free procedure for determination of PAHs in wastewater.     

Analysis of virgin olive oil volatile compounds by headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled to gas chromatography with mass spectrometric and flame ionization detection

The efficiency of headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was evaluated for the qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis of virgin olive oil volatile compounds. The behaviour of four fibre coatings was compared for sensitivity, repeatability and linearity of response. A divinylbenzene-Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane fibre coating was found to be the most suitable for the analysis of virgin olive oil volatiles. Sampling and chromatographic conditions were examined and the SPME method, coupled to GC with MS and flame ionization detection, was applied to virgin olive oil samples. More than 100 compounds were isolated and characterised. The presence of some of these compounds in virgin olive oil has not previously been reported. The main volatile compounds present in the oil samples were determined quantitatively.