Syntheses and X-ray structures of complexes with (η-allyl)Mo-units in oxygen-rich coordination spheres

The reaction of Mo(η³-C₃H₄(CH₃))(CH₃CN)₂(CO)₂Cl with AgBF₄ in THF yields the cationic complex [Mo(η³-C₃H₄(CH₃))(CH₃CN)₂(CO)₂(THF)]⁺[BF₄]⁻, 1, whose X-ray structure has been determined. Oxo nucleophiles are capable of replacing the weakly bound THF molecule in 1 and under simultaneous loss of CH₃CN the resulting complexes aggregate to oligonuclear compounds. Accordingly, the reactions with NaOMe and KOH yield [Na(THF)₄]⁺[(η³-C₃H₄(CH₃))(CO)₂Mo(μ-OCH₃)₃Mo(CO)₂(η³-C₃H₄(CH₃))]⁻, 2 and [K(18-crown-6)]⁺[[Mo(η³-C₃H₄(CH₃))(CO)₂]₃(μ₂-OH)₃(μ₃-OH)]⁻, 3, which were characterized by means of single crystal X-ray diffraction. Due to fluoride abstraction from BF₄⁻ the reaction of 1 with KOH also yields fluorinated derivatives of 3 but incorporation of fluorine in 3 can be avoided if AgO₃SCF₃ rather than AgBF₄ is used to generate the cation of 1. For purposes of comparison the dinuclear complex [K(18-crown-6)]⁺[[Mo(η³-C₃H₄(CH₃))(CO)₂]₂(μ₂-F)₃]⁻, 4, has been prepared, too, showing fluoride bridges and KF bonding. The chemical properties and the structures of these compounds in solution as well as their role as structural models for intermediates during molybdenum oxide catalysed propene oxidation are discussed.     

η-Pentamethylcyclopentadienylruthenium(II) complexes containing η-coordinated α-amino acids

Reaction of [Cp* RuCl₂]₂ with -alanine ( -alaH) in methanol at room temperature in the presence of NaOMe yields the complex Na[Cp* RuCl( -ala)] (1), which contains a five-membered N,O-coordinated chelate ring. The analogous complex Na[Cp* RuCl( -phe)] (2) is obtained under similar conditions but at 0°C in 90% yield. At temperatures above 20°C both 2 and the η⁶-coordinated complex [Cp* Ru( -pheH)]Cl (4) are obtained, with the proportion of the latter increasing with temperature. Compound 4 is obtained in 88% yield by refluxing [Cp* RuCl₂]₂ and -phenylalanine ( -pheH) in CH₃OH/CH₃ONa followed by separation from 2. The analogous ruthenium(II) sandwich complexes 5–10 were obtained from -tyrosine and -tryptophane and various derivatives. [Cp* Ru( -met)] (3), prepared by the reaction of [Cp* RuCl₂]₂ with -methionine ( -metH) in CH₃OH/CH₃ONa, displays N,O,S-coordination.     

Die Reaktionen von M[BF4] (M = Li,K) und (C2H5)2O·BF3 mit (CH3)3SiCN. Bildung von M[BFx>(CN)4—x] (M = Li,K; x = 1, 2) und (CH3)3SiNCBFx(CN)3—x, (x = 0, 1)

The Reactions of M[BF₄] (M = Li, K) and (C₂H₅)₂O·BF₃ with (CH₃)₃SiCN. Formation of M[BF_x(CN)_4—x] (M = Li, K; x = 1, 2) and (CH₃)₃SiNCBF_x(CN)_3—x, (x = 0, 1) The reaction of M[BF₄] (M = Li, K) with (CH₃)₃SiCN leads selectively, depending on the reaction time and temperature, to the mixed cyanofluoroborates M[BF_x(CN)_4—x] (x = 1, 2; M = Li, K). By using (C₂H₅)₂O·BF₃ the synthesis yields the compounds (CH₃)₃SiNCBF_x(CN)_3—x x = 0, 1. The products are characterized by vibrational and NMR‐spectroscopy, as well as by X‐ray diffraction of single‐crystals: Li[BF₂(CN)₂]·2Me₃SiCN Cmc2₁, a = 24.0851(5), b = 12.8829(3), c = 18.9139(5) Å V = 5868.7(2) ų, Z = 12, R₁ = 4.7%; K[BF₂(CN)₂] P4₁2₁2, a = 13.1596(3), c = 38.4183(8) Å, V = 6653.1(3) ų, Z = 48, R₁ = 2.5%; K[BF(CN)₃] P1¯, a = 6.519(1), b = 7.319(1), c = 7.633(2) Å, α = 68.02(3), β = 74.70(3), γ = 89.09(3)°, V = 324.3(1) ų, Z = 2, R₁ = 3.6%; Me₃SiNCBF(CN)₂ Pbca, a = 9.1838(6), b = 13.3094(8), c = 16.840(1) Å, V = 2058.4(2) ų, Z = 8, R₁ = 4.4%     

A selective convenient ruthenium-mediated synthesis of mixed acetals

Addition of alcohols and phenols to allyl ethers catalyzed mainly by ruthenium complexes was studied. Complexes of ruthenium generated in situ from precursors such as {[RuCl₂(1,5-COD)]_x} or [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] and from external ligands such as phosphines (e.g. PPh₃, PBu₃, BINAP) or phosphites (e.g. P(OPh)₃, P(OMe)₃) were found to be particularly efficient catalysts of the studied reactions. Transacetalization reaction could be practically completely eliminated by the addition of a base (particularly Na₂CO₃) to the catalytic systems. It was observed that the selectivity of mixed acetals formation increases with increasing value of Θ parameter of phosphines. Especially interesting results (0–5% of transacetalization) have been obtained for catalytic systems generated from {[RuCl₂(1,5-COD)]_x} or [Ru₃(CO)₁₂], phosphines (PPh₃, BINAP, dppe, tris(2,4,6-tri-metylphenyl)phosphine, or dppf) and Na₂CO₃. The mechanism of mixed acetals formation has been investigated using deuterated reagents. It is postulated that the examined reaction is a nucleophilic addition of ROH to a hydrido-π-allyl complex formed during oxidative addition of allyl substrate to metal complex. As a result, a new, selective, and convenient method of the synthesis of symmetrical and, in particular, unsymmetrical (mixed) acetals has been developed. Mixed acetals CH₃CH₂CH(OR¹)(OR²) may be obtained in the reaction of R¹-O-allyl with R²OH or R¹OH with R²-O-allyl, depending on the structure of R¹ and R².     

Cyanidverbrückte Koordinationspolymere aus cis‐ oder trans‐[Ru(tBuNC)4(CN)2] und MnCl2: Zum Einfluß unterschiedlicher Topologien auf die magnetischen Eigenschaften von Materialien

Cyanide Bridged Coordination Polymers from cis‐ or trans‐[Ru(^tBuNC)₄(CN)₂] and MnCl₂: About the Influence of Different Topologies on the Magnetic Properties of Materials The reaction of cis‐ or trans‐[Ru(^tBuNC)₄(CN)₂] with MnCl₂ as an additional transition metal fragment yields the one dimensional coordination polymers {cis‐[Ru(CN)₂(^tBuNC)₄] MnCl₂}_n, ( 1 ), and {trans‐[Ru(CN)₂(^tBuNC)₄]MnCl₂}_n, ( 2 ), with a different arrangement of the metal centers caused by the different stereochemistry of the starting compounds. The variation of the Ru‐C‐N‐Mn geometry nevertheless leads to significant differences in the magnetic properties of 1 and 2 . The coordination polymer derived from trans‐[Ru(^tBuNC)₄(CN)₂] shows a more efficient antiferromagnetic intrachain interaction between the manganese centers compared to the cis‐derivative.     

Electrochemical behaviour of [Ru(L)(CO)2Cl2] [Ru(L)(CO)Cl3][Me4N] and [Ru(L)(CO)2(CH3CN)2][CF3SO3]2 complexes (L = 2,2′- bipyridine or 4,4′-isopropoxycarbonyl-2,2′-bipyridine)

The clectrochemical behaviour of the complexes [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂Cl₂], [Ru^II(L)(CO)Cl₃][Me₄N] and [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂ (L = 2,2′-bipyridine or 4,4′-isopropoxycarbonyl-2,2′-bipyridine) has been investigated in CH₃CN. The oxidation of [Ru(L)(CO)₂Cl₂] produces new complexes [Ru^III(L)(CO)(CH₃CN)₂Cl]²⁺ as a consequence of the instability of the electrogenerated transient Ru^III species [Ru^III(L)(CO)₂Cl₂]⁺. In contrast, the oxidation of [Ru^II(L)(CO)Cl₃][Me₄N] produces the stable [Ru^III(L)(CO)Cl₃] complex. In contrast [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂ is not oxidized in the range up to the most positive potentials achievable. The reduction of [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂Cl₂] and [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂ results in the formation of identical dark blue strongly adherent electroactive films. These films exhibit the characteristics of a metal-metal bond dimer structure. No films are obtained on reduction of [Ru^II(L)(CO)Cl₃][Me₄N]. The effect of the substitution of the bipyridine ligand by electron-withdrawing carboxy ester groups on the electrochemical behaviour of all these complexes has also been investigated.     

Solvolysis Products of the Types [RhMeL2(Me3[9]aneN3)]2+ and [RuCl3—XLX(Me3[9]aneN3)](x)+ (x = 1‐2) and Preparation and Structure of [Ru([9]aneS3)(Me3[9]aneN3)](CF3SO3)2

Solvolysis of [RhMe(CF₃SO₃)₂(Me₃[9]aneN₃)] ( 1 ) (Me₃[9]aneN₃ = 1, 4, 7‐trimethyl‐1, 4, 7‐triazacyclononane) in CH₃CN, DMSO or pyrazole (L) leads to substitution of both trifluoromethylsulfonate ligands and formation of the cationic complexes [RhMeL₂(Me₃[9]aneN₃)](CF₃SO₃)₂ 3—5 . In contrast, treatment of [RuCl₃(Me₃[9]aneN₃)] ( 2 ) with Ag(CF₃SO₃) in a 1:3 ratio for 2h in CH₃CN leads to formation of the tetranuclear complex [{RuCl₃(Me₃[9]aneN₃)}₂Ag₂(CF₃SO₃)(CH₃CN)](CF₃SO₃) · CH₃CN ( 6 ) with a novel [(RuCl₃)₂Ag₂] core. More forcing conditions enable the substitution of respectively one or two chloride ligands by CH₃CN (reflux 18h) or DMF (85°C, 1h) to afford [RuCl₂(CH₃CN)(Me₃[9]aneN₃)](CF₃SO₃) ( 7 ) and [RuCl(DMF)₂(Me₃[9]aneN₃)](CF₃SO₃)₂ ( 8 ). The heteroleptic sandwich complex [Ru([9]aneS₃)(Me₃[9]aneN₃)](CF₃SO₃)₂ ( 9 ) can be prepared by reduction of 2 with Zn powder in acetone in the presence of 3 equiv. of Ag(CF₃SO₃), followed by addition of [9]aneS₃ (1, 4, 7‐trithiacyclononane). The redox potential E°(Ru³⁺/Ru²⁺) of +1.87 V vs NHE for 9 is only —0.12 V lower than that of the homoleptic complex [Ru([9]aneS₃)₂]²⁺. Crystal structures are reported for 3 — 9 .     

Electrochemical, spectroelectrochemical and theoretical studies on the reduction and deprotonation of the photovoltaic sensitizer [(H3-tctpy)Ru(NCS)3] (H3-tctpy=2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine-4,4′,4′′-tricarboxylic acid)

The electrochemical reduction of the black dye photosensitizer [(H₃-tctpy)Ru^II(NCS)₃]⁻ (H₃-tctpy=2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine-4,4′,4′′-tricarboxylic acid) used in photovoltaic cells has been found to be a complex process when studied in dimethylformamide. At low temperatures, fast scan rates and at a glassy carbon electrode, the chemically reversible ligand based one-electron reduction process [(H₃-tctpy)Ru(NCS)₃]⁻+e⁻[(H₃-tctpy√⁻)Ru(NCS)₃]²⁻ is detected. This process has a reversible half-wave potential (E^r_1/2) of −1585±20 mV versus Fc/Fc⁺ at 25°C. Under other conditions, a deprotonation reaction occurs upon reduction, which produces [(H_3−x-tctpy^x−)Ru(NCS)₃]^(1+x)− and hydrogen gas. Mechanistic pathways giving rise to the final products are discussed. The E^r_1/2-value for the ligand based reductions of the deprotonated complex is 0.70 V more negative than for [(H₃-tctpy)Ru(NCS)₃]⁻. Consequently, data obtained from molecular orbital calculations are consistent with the reaction [(H₃-tctpy)Ru(NCS)₃]⁻+e⁻→[(H₂-tctpy⁻)Ru(NCS)₃]²⁻+1/2H₂ yielding the monodeprotonated complex as the major product obtained after electrochemical reduction of [(H₃-tctpy)Ru(NCS)₃]⁻. The E^r_1/2-values for the metal based Ru^II/III process differ by 0.30 V when data obtained for the protonated and deprotonated forms of the black dye are compared. Electronic spectra obtained during the course of experiments in an optically transparent thin layer electrolysis configuration are consistent with the overall reaction scheme proposed on the basis of voltammetric measurements and molecular orbital calculations. Reduction studies on the free ligand, H₃-tcpy, are consistent with results obtained with [(H₃-tctpy)Ru(NCS)₃]⁻.     

Synthese und dynamisches Verhalten von [Rh2(μ-H)3H2(PiPr3)4]+. Beiträge zur Reaktivität des Tetrahydridodirhodium-Komplexes [Rh2H4(PiPr3)4]

Synthesis and Dynamic Behaviour of [Rh₂(μ-H)₃H₂(PiPr₃)₄]⁺. Contributions to the Reactivity of the Tetrahydridodirhodium Complex [Rh₂H₄(PiPr₃)₄] An improved synthesis of [Rh₂H₄(PiPr₃)₄] ( 2 ) from [Rh(η³-C₃H₅)(PiPr₃)₂] ( 1 ) or [Rh(η³-CH₂C₆H₅)(PiPr₃)₂] ( 3 ) and H₂ is described. Compound 2 reacts with CO or CH₃OH to give trans-[RhH(CO)(PiPr₃)₂] ( 4 ) and with ethene/acetone to yield a mixture of 4 and trans-[RhCH₃(CO)(PiPr₃)₂] ( 5 ). The carbonyl(methyl) complex 5 has also been prepared from trans-[RhCl(CO)(PiPr₃)₂] ( 6 ) and CH₃MgI. Whereas the reaction of 2 with two parts of CF₃CO₂H leads to [RhH₂(η²-O₂CCF₃) · (PiPr₃)₂] ( 8 ), treatment of 2 with one equivalent of CF₃CO₂H in presence of NH₄PF₆ gives the dinuclear compound [Rh₂H₅(PiPr₃)₄]PF₆ ( 9a ). The reactions of 2 with HBF₄ and [NO]BF₄ afford the complexes [Rh₂H₅(PiPr₃)₄]BF₄ ( 9b ) and trans-[RhF(NO)(PiPr₃)₂]BF₄ ( 11 ), respectively. In solution, the cation [Rh₂(μ-H)₃H₂(PiPr₃)₄]⁺ of the compounds 9a and 9b undergoes an intramolecular rearrangement in which the bridging hydrido and the phosphane ligands are involved.     

RuII and RuIII Chloronitrile Complexes: Synthesis,Reaction Chemistry,Solid State Structure,and (Spectro)Electrochemical Behavior

The synthesis of [Ti₆O₄(OiPr)₈(O₂CPh)₈] ( 3 ) and [RuCl(N≡CR)₅][RuCl₄(N≡CR)₂] ( 4a , R = Me; 4b , R = Ph), [Ru(N≡CPh)₆][RuCl₄(N≡CPh)₂] ( 5 ) and [H₃O][RuCl₄(N≡CMe)₂] ( 7a ) is discussed. Crystallization of 5 from CH₂Cl₂ gave trans-[RuCl₂(N≡CPh)₄] ( 6 ). The solid-state structures of 3 , 4a , b , 5 , 6 and 7a are reported. Complex 4b forms a 3D network, while 6 displays a 2D structure, due to π-interactions between the benzonitrile ligands. The (spectro)electrochemical behavior of 4a , b and 6 was studied at 25 and –72 °C and the results thereof are compared with [NEt₄][RuCl₄(N≡CMe)₂] ( 7b ) and [RuCl(N≡CPh)₅][PF₆] ( 8 ). The electrochemical response of the cation and the anion in 4a , b are independent from each other. [RuCl(N≡CR)₅]⁺ possesses one reversible Ru^II/Ru^III process. However, [RuCl₄(N≡CMe)₂]^– was shown to be prone to ligand exchange and disproportionation upon formation of either a Ru^IV and Ru^II species at 25 °C, while at –72 °C the rapid conversion of the electrochemically formed species is hindered. In situ IR and UV/Vis/NIR studies confirmed the respective disproportionation reaction products of the aforementioned oxidation and reduction, respectively.     

Selective formation of trans and cis(CH3CN) isomers of [Ru(bpy)(CO)2(CH3CN)2] (bpy=2,2-bipyridine) from [Ru(CO)2(CH3CN)3]2(PF6)2 using an electrochemical oxidation step

The selective in situ synthesis of trans and cis(CH₃CN)-[Ru(bpy)(CO)₂ (CH₃CN)₂]²⁺ isomers from the same [Ru(CO)₂ (CH₃CN)₃]₂²⁺ dimer precursor but using either an electrochemical-chemical or chemical-electrochemical process is described.     

S5N5⊕[RuCl3(CO)3]⊖ · 0,5 CH2Cl2 Synthese,IR-Spektrum und Kristallstruktur

S₅N₅^⊕[RuCl₃(CO)₃]^⊖ · 0.5 CH₂Cl₂. Synthesis, I.R. Spectrum and Crystal Structure S₅N₅[RuCl₃(CO)₃] · 0.5 CH₂Cl₂ is prepared from Ru₃(CO)₁₂ and trithiazylchloride in boiling dichloromethane; it forms red crystals, which are characterized by it's IR spectrum and by structural determination with X-ray methods. The compound crystallizes monoclinic in the space group C2/c with 8 formula units per unit cell. The lattice dimensions are a = 2047, b = 1064, c = 1637 pm, β = 96.1° (3487 independent, observed reflexions, R = 0.075). The structure consists of planar, cyclic S₅N₅^⊕ cations in the “azulene” conformation with bond lengths SN from 155 to 159 pm, and octahedral [RuCl₃(CO)₃]^⊖ anions with fac-geometry and bond lengths Ru Cl of 242 pm and Ru C of 185 to 190 pm.     

Syntheses, structures, spectroscopic, electrochemical properties and DFT calculation of Ru(II)–thioarylazoimidazole complexes

The reaction of 1-alkyl-2-{(o-thioalkyl)phenylazo}imidazoles (SRaaiNR) (2a/2b) with Ru(II) has synthesized [Ru(SRaaiNR)₂](ClO₄)₂ (3a/3b) in 2-methoxyethanol. The reaction in methanol, however, has synthesized [Ru(SRaaiNR)(SRaaiNR)Cl](ClO₄) (4a/4b). The solid phase reaction of SRaaiNR and RuCl₃ on silica gel surface upon microwave irradiation has synthesized [Ru(SRaaiNR)(SaaiNR)](PF₆) (5a/5b) [SRaaiNR represents tridentate N,N′,S-chelator; SRaaiNR is N,N′-bidentate chelator where S does not coordinate and SaaiNR refers N,N′,S-chelator where S refers to thiolato binding]. The structural characterization of [Ru(SEtaaiNEt)(SEtaaiNEt)Cl](ClO₄) (4b) and [Ru(SEtaaiNEt)(SaaiNEt)](PF₆) (5b) has been confirmed by single crystal X-ray diffraction study. The IR, UV–Vis, and ¹H NMR spectral data also support the stereochemistry of the complexes. The complexes show metal oxidation, Ru(III)/Ru(II), and ligand reductions (azo/azo⁻, azo⁻/azo). The molecular orbital diagram has been drawn by density functional theory (DFT) calculation. Normal mode of analysis has been performed to correlate calculated and experimental frequencies of representative complexes. The electronic movement and assignment of electronic spectra have been carried out by TDDFT calculation both in gas and acetonitrile phase.     

Mapping the Transformation [{RuII(CO)3Cl2}2]→[RuI2(CO)4]2+: Implications in Binuclear Water–Gas Shift Chemistry

The complete sequence of reactions in the base‐promoted reduction of [{Ru^II(CO)₃Cl₂}₂] to [Ru^I₂(CO)₄]²⁺ has been unraveled. Several μ‐OH, μ:κ²‐CO₂H‐bridged diruthenium(II) complexes have been synthesized; they are the direct results of the nucleophilic activation of metal‐coordinated carbonyls by hydroxides. The isolated compounds are [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)₂(μ‐OH)(NP^F‐Am)₂][PF₆] ( 1 ; NP^F‐Am=2‐amino‐5,7‐trifluoromethyl‐1,8‐naphthyridine) and [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)(μ‐OH)(NP‐Me₂)₂][BF₄]₂ ( 2 ), secured by the applications of naphthyridine derivatives. In the absence of any capping ligand, a tetranuclear complex [Ru₄(CO)₈(H₂O)₂(μ³‐OH)₂(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)₄][CF₃SO₃]₂ ( 3 ) is isolated. The bridging hydroxido ligand in 1 is readily replaced by a π‐donor chlorido ligand, which results in [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)₂(μ‐Cl)(NP‐PhOMe)₂][BF₄] ( 4 ). The production of [Ru₂(CO)₄]²⁺ has been attributed to the thermally induced decarboxylation of a bis(hydroxycarbonyl)–diruthenium(II) complex to a dihydrido–diruthenium(II) species, followed by dinuclear reductive elimination of molecular hydrogen with the concomitant formation of the Ru^I? Ru^I single bond. This work was originally instituted to find a reliable synthetic protocol for the [Ru₂(CO)₄(CH₃CN)₆]²⁺ precursor. It is herein prescribed that at least four equivalents of base, complete removal of chlorido ligands by Tl^I salts, and heating at reflux in acetonitrile for a period of four hours are the conditions for the optimal conversion. Premature quenching of the reaction resulted in the isolation of a trinuclear Ru^I₂Ru^II complex [{Ru(NP‐Am)₂(CO)}{Ru₂(NP‐Am)₂(CO)₂(μ‐CO)₂}(μ₃:κ³‐C,O,O′‐CO₂)][BF₄]₂ ( 6 ). These unprecedented diruthenium compounds are the dinuclear congeners of the water–gas shift (WGS) intermediates. The possibility of a dinuclear pathway eliminates the inherent contradiction of pH demands in the WGS catalytic cycle in an alkaline medium. A cooperative binuclear elimination could be a viable route for hydrogen production in WGS chemistry.     

Iodination of cyclo‐E5‐Complexes (E=P,As)

In a high‐yield one‐pot synthesis, the reactions of [Cp*M(η⁵‐P₅)] (M=Fe ( 1 ), Ru ( 2 )) with I₂ resulted in the selective formation of [Cp*MP₆I₆]⁺ salts ( 3 , 4 ). The products comprise unprecedented all‐cis tripodal triphosphino‐cyclotriphosphine ligands. The iodination of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐As₅)] ( 6 ) gave, in addition to [Fe(CH₃CN)₆]²⁺ salts of the rare [As₆I₈]^2? (in 7 ) and [As₄I₁₄]^2? (in 8 ) anions, the first di‐cationic Fe‐As triple decker complex [(Cp*Fe)₂(μ,η^5:5‐As₅)][As₆I₈] ( 9 ). In contrast, the iodination of [Cp*Ru(η⁵‐As₅)] ( 10 ) did not result in the full cleavage of the M?As bonds. Instead, a number of dinuclear complexes were obtained: [(Cp*Ru)₂(μ,η^5:5‐As₅)][As₆I₈]_0.5 ( 11 ) represents the first Ru‐As₅ triple decker complex, thus completing the series of monocationic complexes [(Cp^RM)₂(μ,η^5:5‐E₅)]⁺ (M=Fe, Ru; E=P, As). [(Cp*Ru)₂As₈I₆] ( 12 ) crystallizes as a racemic mixture of both enantiomers, while [(Cp*Ru)₂As₄I₄] ( 13 ) crystallizes as a symmetric and an asymmetric isomer and features a unique tetramer of {AsI} arsinidene units as a middle deck.     

Synthesis, characterization and catalytic property of ruthenium-terpyridyl complexes

The known compound 4′-(carboxyphenyl)-2,2′:6,2″-terpyridine (LH) was prepared and complexed with RuCl₃.3H₂O. The resulting complex [Ru(LH)Cl₃] was then allowed to react separately with 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy), 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), triphenylphosphine (PPh₃) and 1,2-bis-(diphenylphosphino)ethane (dppe). The compositions of corresponding complexes [Ru(LH)bpyCl](BF₄) 1, [Ru(LH)phenCl](BF₄) 2, [Ru(LH)(PPh₃)(CH₃CN)₂] (BF₄)₂3 and [Ru(LH)(dppe)Cl](BF₄) 4 were assigned on the basis of their FAB-mass spectra, elemental analysis, spectroscopic (IR, NMR) data and X-ray diffraction measurements. The diamagnetic, cationic complexes displayed strong MLCT transitions in the visible region with significant shift in MLCT band energy corresponding to the strength of substituted ligands. The redox behaviour of the complexes was investigated using cyclic voltammetry measurements. Among all the complexes, 3 efficiently catalyzed the synthesis of propargylamine via three components coupling reaction.     

Neutrale und kationische Ruthenium(II)-Komplexe mit trifunktionellen Phosphanliganden

Neutral and Cationic Ruthenium(II) Complexes with Trifunctional Phosphane Ligands Compounds of the type [RuCl₂(RPX₂)₂] 4 – 7 (R = iPr, tBu; X = CH₂CH₂OMe, CH₂CO₂Me) were prepared by reacting RPX₂ with either RuCl₃ · 3H₂O or [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃], respectively. In 4 – 7 the trifunctional phosphanes coordinate as bidentate ligands to the metal center through the phosphorus atom and the oxygen atom of a methoxy or carbonyl group. The lability of the Ru–O bond allows substitution reactions with CO, tert-butylisonitrile and phenylacetylene. The Ru–Cl bonds in 5 (R = tBu; X = CH₂CH₂OMe) can be cleaved upon treatment with one or two equiv of AgPF₆ yielding mono- or dicationic derivatives. In these complexes the ligands are coordinated to the metal center through the phosphorus and both of the oxygen donor atoms. The reaction of the phosphinoesterenolate compound 17 with Ph₂C=C=O leads to the insertion of two molecules of the ketene into the C–H bond of one of the five-membered metal-enolate rings to yield the “expanded” chelate complex 18 , the structure of which was determined by X-ray crystallography.     

Reactivity of [M2(μ‐Cl)2(cod)2] (M=Ir,Rh) and [Ru(Cl)2(cod)(CH3CN)2] with Na[H2B(bt)2]: Formation of Agostic versus Borate Complexes

Treatment of [M₂(μ‐Cl)₂(cod)₂] (M=Ir and Rh) with Na[H₂B(bt)₂] (cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene and bt=2‐mercaptobenzothiazolyl) at low temperature led to the formation of dimetallaheterocycles [(Mcod)₂(bt)₂], 1 and 2 ( 1 : M=Ir and 2 : M=Rh) and a borate complex [Rh(cod){κ²‐S,S′‐H₂B(bt)₂}], 3 . Compounds 1 and 2 are structurally characterized metal analogues of 1,5‐cyclooctadiene. Metal–metal bond distances of 3.6195(9) Å in 1 and 3.6749(9) Å in 2 are too long to consider as bonding. In an attempt to generate the Ru analogue of 1 and 2 , that is [(Rucod)₂(bt)₂], we have carried out the reaction of [Ru(Cl)₂(cod)(CH₃CN)₂] with Na[H₂B(bt)₂]. Interestingly, the reaction yielded agostic complexes [Ru(cod)L{κ³‐H,S,S′‐H₂B(bt)₂}], 4 and 5 ( 4 : L=Cl; 5 : L=C₇H₄NS₂). One of the key differences between 4 and 5 is the presence of different ancillary ligands at the metal center. The natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis of 1 and 2 shows that there is four lone pairs of electrons on each metal center with a significant amount of d character. Furthermore, the electronic structures and the bonding of these complexes have been established on the ground of quantum‐chemical calculations. All of the new compounds were characterized by IR, ¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, and X‐ray crystallographic analysis.     

Die Kristallstrukturen der Cyanidofluoridoborate K[BFx(CN)4–x], x = 0–4

The crystal structure of K[BF₃(CN)] (Pbcn (Nr. 60) with a = 13.3486(15) b = 6.5239(7) c = 10.0085(11) Å, and eight formula units per unit cell) has been determined and the one of K[BF₂(CN)₂] was confirmed and improved. The different networks in the complete series of borates K[BF_x(CN)_4–x], x = 0–4 are compared and discussed.     

Syntheses and Characterization of Manganese-Tellurolate Complexes by Using Chelating Metalloligand cis-[Mn(Co)4(TePh)2]− and Potential Electrophilic TeMe+ Reagent

The cis-[Mn(CO)₄(TePh)₂]^?, similar to bidentate ligand PhTe(CH₂)₃TePh, acts as a “chelating metalloligand” for the synthesis of metallic tellurolate compounds. The reaction of cis[Mn(CO)₄(TePh)₂]^? with BrMn(CO)₅ in THF leads to a mixture of products[(CO)₃,BrMn(μ-TePh)₂Mn(CO)₄]^? (1) and Mn₂(μ-TePh)₂(CO)_g (2). Complex 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group Pl? with a = 11.309(3) Å, b = 14.780(5) Å, c = 19.212(6) Å, a = 76.05(3)° β = 72.31(3)°, γ = 70.41(3)° V = 2848(2) Å₃, Z = 2. Final R = 0.034 and R_w = 0.035 resulting from refinement of 10021 total reflections with 677 parameters, Dropwise addition of (MeTe)₂ to a solution of [Me₃O][BF₄] in CH₃CN leads to formation of [Me₂TeTeMe][BF₄], a potential MeTe⁺ donor ligand. In contrast to oxidative addition of diphenyl ditelluride to [Mn(CO)s]^? to give cis-[Mn(CO)₄(TePh)₂]^? which was thermally transformed into [(CO)₃Mn(μ-TePh)₃Mn(CO)₃]^?, reaction of [Mn(CO)₅]^?with [Me₂TeTeMe]⁺ proceeded to give the monomeric species MeTeMn(CO)₅ as initial product which was then dimerized into Mn₂(μ-TeMe)₂(CO)_g (4).