On the polynomial-space completeness of intuitionistic propositional logic

We present an alternative, purely semantical and relatively simple, proof of the Statman's result that both intuitionistic propositional logic and its implicational fragment are PSPACE-complete.This paper was supported by grant 401/01/0218 of the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic. % Mathematics Subject Classification (2000):     

On intermediate inquisitive and dependence logics: An algebraic study

This article provides an algebraic study of intermediate inquisitive and dependence logics. While these logics are usually investigated using team semantics, here we introduce an alternative algebraic semantics and we prove it is complete for all intermediate inquisitive and dependence logics. To this end, we define inquisitive and dependence algebras and we investigate their model-theoretic properties. We then focus on finite, core-generated, well-connected inquisitive and dependence algebras: we show they witness the validity of formulas true in inquisitive algebras, and of formulas true in well-connected dependence algebras. Finally, we obtain representation theorems for finite, core-generated, well-connected, inquisitive and dependence algebras and we prove some results connecting team and algebraic semantics.     

The Skolemization of prenex formulas in intermediate logics

The skolem class of a logic consists of the formulas for which the derivability of the formula is equivalent to the derivability of its Skolemization. In contrast to classical logic, the skolem classes of many intermediate logics do not contain all formulas. In this paper it is proven for certain classes of propositional formulas that any instance of them by (independent) predicate sentences in prenex normal form belongs to the skolem class of any intermediate logic complete with respect to a class of well-founded trees. In particular, all prenex sentences belong to the skolem class of these logics, and this result extends to the constant domain versions of these logics.     

Kripke‐style semantics for many‐valued logics

This paper deals with Kripke‐style semantics for many‐valued logics. We introduce various types of Kripke semantics, and we connect them with algebraic semantics. As for modal logics, we relate the axioms of logics extending MTL to properties of the Kripke frames in which they are valid. We show that in the propositional case most logics are complete but not strongly complete with respect to the corresponding class of complete Kripke frames, whereas in the predicate case there are important many‐valued logics like BL, ? and Π, which are not even complete with respect to the class of all predicate Kripke frames in which they are valid. Thus although very natural, Kripke semantics seems to be slightly less powerful than algebraic semantics. (© 2003 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

On the Finite Model Property of Intuitionistic Modal Logics over MIPC

MIPC is a well-known intuitionistic modal logic of Prior (1957) and Bull (1966). It is shown that every normal intuitionistic modal logic L over MIPC has the finite model property whenever L is Kripke-complete and universal.     

Basic Propositional Calculus I

We present an axiomatization for Basic Propositional Calculus BPC and give a completeness theorem for the class of transitive Kripke structures. We present several refinements, including a completeness theorem for irreflexive trees. The class of intermediate logics includes two maximal nodes, one being Classical Propositional Calculus CPC, the other being E₁, a theory axiomatized by T → ⊥. The intersection CPC ∩ E₁ is axiomatizable by the Principle of the Excluded Middle A V ∨ ?A. If B is a formula such that (T → B) → B is not derivable, then the lattice of formulas built from one propositional variable p using only the binary connectives, is isomorphically preserved if B is substituted for p. A formula (T → B) → B is derivable exactly when B is provably equivalent to a formula of the form ((T → A) → A) → (T → A).     

Submodels of Kripke models

A Kripke model ? is a submodel of another Kripke model ℳ if ? is obtained by restricting the set of nodes of ℳ. In this paper we show that the class of formulas of Intuitionistic Predicate Logic that is preserved under taking submodels of Kripke models is precisely the class of semipositive formulas. This result is an analogue of the Łoś-Tarski theorem for the Classical Predicate Calculus. In Appendix A we prove that for theories with decidable identity we can take as the embeddings between domains in Kripke models of the theory, the identical embeddings. This is a well known fact, but we know of no correct proof in the literature. In Appendix B we answer, negatively, a question posed by Sam Buss: whether there is a classical theory T, such that ℋT is HA. Here ℋT is the theory of all Kripke models ℳ such that the structures assigned to the nodes of ℳ all satisfy T in the sense of classical model theory. Received: 4 February 1999 / Published online: 25 January 2001     

A BRIEF SURVEY OF FRAMES FOR THE LAMBEK CALCULUS

Models for the Lambek calculus of syntactic categories surveyed here are based on frames that are in principle of the same type as Kripke frames for intuitionistic logic. These models are extracted from the literature on models for relevant logics, in particular the ternary relationed models introduced in the early seventies. The purpose of this brief survey is to locate some open completeness problems for variants of the Lambek calculus in the context of completeness results based on various types of ternary relational models.     

Fuzzy logics with modalities

We explore the basic fuzzy logic BL as well as propositional fuzzy logics with modalities □ and ◊ and a total accessibility relation. Formulations and proofs are given to replacement theorems for BL. A basic calculus of modal fuzzy logic is introduced. For this calculus and its extensions, we prove replacement and deduction theorems. Supported by RFBR grant No. 06-01-00358, by INTAS grant No. 04-77-7080, and by the Council for Grants (under RF President) and State Aid of Fundamental Science Schools, project NSh-4787.2006.1. __________ Translated from Algebra i Logika, Vol. 45, No. 6, pp. 731–757, November–December, 2006.     

On intuitionistic modal and tense logics and their classical companion logics: Topological semantics and bisimulations

We take the well-known intuitionistic modal logic of Fischer Servi with semantics in bi-relational Kripke frames, and give the natural extension to topological Kripke frames. Fischer Servi’s two interaction conditions relating the intuitionistic pre-order (or partial-order) with the modal accessibility relation generalize to the requirement that the relation and its inverse be lower semi-continuous with respect to the topology. We then investigate the notion of topological bisimulation relations between topological Kripke frames, as introduced by Aiello and van Benthem, and show that their topology-preserving conditions are equivalent to the properties that the inverse relation and the relation are lower semi-continuous with respect to the topologies on the two models. The first main result is that this notion of topological bisimulation yields semantic preservation w.r.t. topological Kripke models for both intuitionistic tense logics, and for their classical companion multi-modal logics in the setting of the Gödel translation. After giving canonical topological Kripke models for the Hilbert-style axiomatizations of the Fischer Servi logic and its classical companion logic, we use the canonical model in a second main result to characterize a Hennessy–Milner class of topological models between any pair of which there is a maximal topological bisimulation that preserve the intuitionistic semantics.     

A Basis in Semi‐Reduced Form for the Admissible Rules of the Intuitionistic Logic IPC

We study the problem of finding a basis for all rules admissible in the intuitionistic propositional logic IPC. The main result is Theorem 3.1 which gives a basis consisting of all rules in semi‐reduced form satisfying certain specific additional requirements. Using developed technique we also find a basis for rules admissible in the logic of excluded middle law KC.     

Kripke submodels and universal sentences

We define two notions for intuitionistic predicate logic: that of a submodel of a Kripke model, and that of a universal sentence. We then prove a corresponding preservation theorem. If a Kripke model is viewed as a functor from a small category to the category of all classical models with (homo)morphisms between them, then we define a submodel of a Kripke model to be a restriction of the original Kripke model to a subcategory of its domain, where every node in the subcategory is mapped to a classical submodel of the corresponding classical model in the range of the original Kripke model. We call a sentence universal if it is built inductively from atoms (including ? and ⊥) using ∧, ∨, ?, and →, with the restriction that antecedents of → must be atomic. We prove that an intuitionistic theory is axiomatized by universal sentences if and only if it is preserved under Kripke submodels. We also prove the following analogue of a classical model‐consistency theorem: The universal fragment of a theory Γ is contained in the universal fragment of a theory Δ if and only if every rooted Kripke model of Δ is strongly equivalent to a submodel of a rooted Kripke model of Γ. Our notions of Kripke submodel and universal sentence are natural in the sense that in the presence of the rule of excluded middle, they collapse to the classical notions of submodel and universal sentence. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

A spatial modal logic with a location interpretation

A spatial modal logic (SML) is introduced as an extension of the modal logic S4 with the addition of certain spatial operators. A sound and complete Kripke semantics with a natural space (or location) interpretation is obtained for SML. The finite model property with respect to the semantics for SML and the cut‐elimination theorem for a modified subsystem of SML are also presented. (© 2005 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Exhibiting Wide Families of Maximal Intermediate Propositional Logics with the Disjunction Property

We provide results allowing to state, by the simple inspection of suitable classes of posets (propositional Kripke frames), that the corresponding intermediate propositional logics are maximal among the ones which satisfy the disjunction property. Starting from these results, we directly exhibit, without using the axiom of choice, the Kripke frames semantics of 2^No maximal intermediate propositional logics with the disjunction property. This improves previous evaluations, giving rise to the same conclusion but made with an essential use of the axiom of choice, of the cardinality of the set of the maximal intermediate propositional logics with the disjunction property. Mathematics Subject Classification: 03B55, 03C90.     

The decision problem of provability logic with only one atom

The decision problem for provability logic remains PSPACE-complete even if the number of propositional atoms is restricted to one. This paper was supported by grant 401/01/0218 of the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic.     

An explicit basis for the admissible inference rules of the modal logics extending <Emphasis Type="Italic">S</Emphasis>4.1 And <Emphasis Type="Italic">Grz</Emphasis>

We study bases for the admissible inference rules in a broad class of modal logics. We construct an explicit basis for all admissible rules in the logics S4.1, Grz, and their extensions whose number is at least countable. The resulting basis consists of an infinite sequence of rules in a concise and simple form. In the case of a logic of finite width a basis for all admissible rules consists of a finite sequence of rules.     

Automata and logics over finitely varying functions

We extend some of the classical connections between automata and logic due to Büchi (1960) [5] and McNaughton and Papert (1971) [12] to languages of finitely varying functions or “signals”. In particular, we introduce a natural class of automata for generating finitely varying functions called ’s, and show that it coincides in terms of language definability with a natural monadic second-order logic interpreted over finitely varying functions Rabinovich (2002) [15]. We also identify a “counter-free” subclass of ’s which characterise the first-order definable languages of finitely varying functions. Our proofs mainly factor through the classical results for word languages. These results have applications in automata characterisations for continuously interpreted real-time logics like Metric Temporal Logic (MTL) Chevalier et al. (2006, 2007) [6] and [7].