On the polynomial-space completeness of intuitionistic propositional logic

We present an alternative, purely semantical and relatively simple, proof of the Statman's result that both intuitionistic propositional logic and its implicational fragment are PSPACE-complete.This paper was supported by grant 401/01/0218 of the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic. % Mathematics Subject Classification (2000):     

The Skolemization of prenex formulas in intermediate logics

The skolem class of a logic consists of the formulas for which the derivability of the formula is equivalent to the derivability of its Skolemization. In contrast to classical logic, the skolem classes of many intermediate logics do not contain all formulas. In this paper it is proven for certain classes of propositional formulas that any instance of them by (independent) predicate sentences in prenex normal form belongs to the skolem class of any intermediate logic complete with respect to a class of well-founded trees. In particular, all prenex sentences belong to the skolem class of these logics, and this result extends to the constant domain versions of these logics.     

Submodels of Kripke models

A Kripke model ? is a submodel of another Kripke model ℳ if ? is obtained by restricting the set of nodes of ℳ. In this paper we show that the class of formulas of Intuitionistic Predicate Logic that is preserved under taking submodels of Kripke models is precisely the class of semipositive formulas. This result is an analogue of the Łoś-Tarski theorem for the Classical Predicate Calculus. In Appendix A we prove that for theories with decidable identity we can take as the embeddings between domains in Kripke models of the theory, the identical embeddings. This is a well known fact, but we know of no correct proof in the literature. In Appendix B we answer, negatively, a question posed by Sam Buss: whether there is a classical theory T, such that ℋT is HA. Here ℋT is the theory of all Kripke models ℳ such that the structures assigned to the nodes of ℳ all satisfy T in the sense of classical model theory. Received: 4 February 1999 / Published online: 25 January 2001     

A BRIEF SURVEY OF FRAMES FOR THE LAMBEK CALCULUS

Models for the Lambek calculus of syntactic categories surveyed here are based on frames that are in principle of the same type as Kripke frames for intuitionistic logic. These models are extracted from the literature on models for relevant logics, in particular the ternary relationed models introduced in the early seventies. The purpose of this brief survey is to locate some open completeness problems for variants of the Lambek calculus in the context of completeness results based on various types of ternary relational models.     

Fuzzy logics with modalities

We explore the basic fuzzy logic BL as well as propositional fuzzy logics with modalities □ and ◊ and a total accessibility relation. Formulations and proofs are given to replacement theorems for BL. A basic calculus of modal fuzzy logic is introduced. For this calculus and its extensions, we prove replacement and deduction theorems. Supported by RFBR grant No. 06-01-00358, by INTAS grant No. 04-77-7080, and by the Council for Grants (under RF President) and State Aid of Fundamental Science Schools, project NSh-4787.2006.1. __________ Translated from Algebra i Logika, Vol. 45, No. 6, pp. 731–757, November–December, 2006.     

On intuitionistic modal and tense logics and their classical companion logics: Topological semantics and bisimulations

We take the well-known intuitionistic modal logic of Fischer Servi with semantics in bi-relational Kripke frames, and give the natural extension to topological Kripke frames. Fischer Servi’s two interaction conditions relating the intuitionistic pre-order (or partial-order) with the modal accessibility relation generalize to the requirement that the relation and its inverse be lower semi-continuous with respect to the topology. We then investigate the notion of topological bisimulation relations between topological Kripke frames, as introduced by Aiello and van Benthem, and show that their topology-preserving conditions are equivalent to the properties that the inverse relation and the relation are lower semi-continuous with respect to the topologies on the two models. The first main result is that this notion of topological bisimulation yields semantic preservation w.r.t. topological Kripke models for both intuitionistic tense logics, and for their classical companion multi-modal logics in the setting of the Gödel translation. After giving canonical topological Kripke models for the Hilbert-style axiomatizations of the Fischer Servi logic and its classical companion logic, we use the canonical model in a second main result to characterize a Hennessy–Milner class of topological models between any pair of which there is a maximal topological bisimulation that preserve the intuitionistic semantics.     

The decision problem of provability logic with only one atom

The decision problem for provability logic remains PSPACE-complete even if the number of propositional atoms is restricted to one. This paper was supported by grant 401/01/0218 of the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic.     

Exhibiting Wide Families of Maximal Intermediate Propositional Logics with the Disjunction Property

We provide results allowing to state, by the simple inspection of suitable classes of posets (propositional Kripke frames), that the corresponding intermediate propositional logics are maximal among the ones which satisfy the disjunction property. Starting from these results, we directly exhibit, without using the axiom of choice, the Kripke frames semantics of 2^No maximal intermediate propositional logics with the disjunction property. This improves previous evaluations, giving rise to the same conclusion but made with an essential use of the axiom of choice, of the cardinality of the set of the maximal intermediate propositional logics with the disjunction property. Mathematics Subject Classification: 03B55, 03C90.     

An explicit basis for the admissible inference rules of the modal logics extending <Emphasis Type="Italic">S</Emphasis>4.1 And <Emphasis Type="Italic">Grz</Emphasis>

We study bases for the admissible inference rules in a broad class of modal logics. We construct an explicit basis for all admissible rules in the logics S4.1, Grz, and their extensions whose number is at least countable. The resulting basis consists of an infinite sequence of rules in a concise and simple form. In the case of a logic of finite width a basis for all admissible rules consists of a finite sequence of rules.     

Automata and logics over finitely varying functions

We extend some of the classical connections between automata and logic due to Büchi (1960) [5] and McNaughton and Papert (1971) [12] to languages of finitely varying functions or “signals”. In particular, we introduce a natural class of automata for generating finitely varying functions called ’s, and show that it coincides in terms of language definability with a natural monadic second-order logic interpreted over finitely varying functions Rabinovich (2002) [15]. We also identify a “counter-free” subclass of ’s which characterise the first-order definable languages of finitely varying functions. Our proofs mainly factor through the classical results for word languages. These results have applications in automata characterisations for continuously interpreted real-time logics like Metric Temporal Logic (MTL) Chevalier et al. (2006, 2007) [6] and [7].     

Topological implications in varieties

In 1997, Coleman showed that a variety V is n-permutable for some n iff every T ₀-topological Algebra in V is T ₁. Here we show that the implication " sober" is another such characterization for n-permutability. Other implications of a similar nature are given. For example, an n-permutable variety having a majority term satisfies ". Received July 13, 1998; accepted in final form April 13, 1999     

On interplay of quantifiers in Gödel-Dummett fuzzy logics

Axiomatization of Gödel-Dummett predicate logics S2G, S3G, and PG, where PG is the weakest logic in which all prenex operations are sound, and the relationships of these logics to logics known from the literature are discussed. Examples of non-prenexable formulas are given for those logics where some prenex operation is not available. Inter-expressibility of quantifiers is explored for each of the considered logics.     

Restricted interpolation property in superintuitionistic logics

The restricted interpolation property IPR in modal and superintuitionistic logics is investigated. It is proved that in superintuitionistic logics of finite slices and in finite-slice extensions of the Grzegorczyk logic, the property IPR is equivalent to the projective Beth property PB2. Supported by RFBR (project No. 06-01-00358) and by the Council for Grants (under RF President) and State Aid of Leading Scientific Schools (grant NSh-335.2008.1). Translated from Algebra i Logika, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 54-89, January-February, 2009.     

A semantic hierarchy for intuitionistic logic

Brouwer’s views on the foundations of mathematics have inspired the study of intuitionistic logic, including the study of the intuitionistic propositional calculus and its extensions. The theory of these systems has become an independent branch of logic with connections to lattice theory, topology, modal logic, and other areas. This paper aims to present a modern account of semantics for intuitionistic propositional systems. The guiding idea is that of a hierarchy of semantics, organized by increasing generality: from the least general Kripke semantics on through Beth semantics, topological semantics, Dragalin semantics, and finally to the most general algebraic semantics. While the Kripke, topological, and algebraic semantics have been extensively studied, the Beth and Dragalin semantics have received less attention. We bring Beth and Dragalin semantics to the fore, relating them to the concept of a nucleus from pointfree topology, which provides a unifying perspective on the semantic hierarchy.