Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbones. Part 25

The ability of A*[s ]U dinucleosides to gel organic solvents and water is modulated by changing the nature of the substituents at O C(2′) and O C(3′), as evidenced by comparing the gelation of the dinucleosides 7 – 9 and the properties of the gels. A mere extension of the hydrophobic moiety, by replacing the isopropylidene groups of 2 by cyclohexylidene groups, as in 7 , has a small effect, while changing the conformation of the ribose ring and reducing the size of the hydrophobic moiety, as in 8 , has a strong effect on the scope of gelation, the minimum gelation concentration, as low as 0.07% for pentanol and decanol, and the properties of the gel. The fully deprotected dinucleoside 9 gels water at a minimal gelation concentration of 0.6%. A TEM of the corresponding xerogel shows the formation of fibers with a diameter of ca. 30 to 90 nm.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbones. Part 24

Inspection of Maruzen models and force‐field calculations suggest that oligonucleotide analogues integrating backbone and bases (ONIBs) with an aminomethylene linker form similar cyclic duplexes as the analogous oxymethylene linked dinucleosides. The self‐complementary adenosine‐ and uridine‐derived aminomethylene‐linked A*[n ]U dinucleosides 15 – 17 were prepared by an aza‐Wittig reaction of the aldehyde 10 with an iminophosphorane derived from azide 6 . The sequence‐isomeric U*[n ]A dinucleosides 18 – 20 were similarly prepared from aldehyde 3 and azide 12 . The N‐ethylamine 5 , the acetamides 7 and 14 , and the amine 13 were prepared as references for the conformational analysis of the dinucleosides. In contradistinction to the results of calculations, the N‐ethylamine 5 exists as intramolecularly H‐bonded hydroxyimino tautomer. The association in CDCl₃ of these dinucleosides was studied by ¹H‐NMR and CD spectroscopy. The A*[n ]U dinucleosides 16 and 17 associate more strongly than the sequence isomers 19 and 20 ; the cyclic duplexes of 16 form preferentially Watson–Crick‐type base pairs, while 17, 19 , and 20 show both Watson–Crick‐ and Hoogsteen‐type base pairing. The cyclic duplexes of the aminomethylene‐linked dinucleosides prefer a gg‐orientation of the linker. No evidence was found for an intramolecular H‐bond of the aminomethylene group. The CD spectra of 16 and 17 show a strong, those of 19 a weak, and those of 20 almost no temperature dependence.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbones. Part 23

The sulfone 2 , and the sulfoxides (S)‐ 3 and (R)‐ 3 were obtained by oxidation of the thiomethylene‐linked A*[s ]U dinucleoside 1 . Conformational analysis and association studies of 2 , (S)‐ 3 , and (R)‐ 3 reveal a strong influence of the configuration on the conformation of the linking unit and on the self‐association of the dinucleosides.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 32

The G[s ]G dinucleoside 6 and the G[s ]G* dinucleoside 8 were prepared by alkylation of the guanosine thiols derived from 2 and 5 , respectively, by the C(8)‐chloromethylated guanosine 4 that was obtained from alcohol 3 . Dinucleosides 6 and 8 were deacylated to 7 and 9 , and fully deprotected to 10 and 11 , respectively. The G[n ]G dinucleoside 16 was obtained by reductive amination of aldehyde 13 with an iminophosphorane derived from azide 14 and deprotection of the resulting dimer 15 . In the solid state of 6 , and in a solution of 6 and 8 in CDCl₃, H? N(1/I) and H? N(1/II) are engaged in intramolecular H‐bonds to the C?O of the isobutyryl protecting groups, and HN of the isobutyryl group of unit I forms an interresidue, intramolecular H‐bond to N(7/II), leading to a syn orientation of the nucleobase at unit I, to a tg orientation of the sulfanyl moiety, and to an orthogonal orientation of the nucleobases, preventing any base pairing. The silylated and isopropylidenated dinucleosides 7 and 9 are present in DMSO solution as solvated monoplexes. Broad ¹H‐NMR signals of the nucleosides 7 and 16 in CHCl₃ solution evidence equilibrating G‐quadruplexes. The quadruplex formation of 7 and 16 was established by ¹H‐NMR spectroscopy (only of 16 ), vapour pressure osmometry, mass spectrometry, and CD spectroscopy. The C(6(I))‐hydroxymethylated analogue 9 in CDCl₃ and the fully deprotected dinucleosides 10 and 11 in H₂O form only weakly π? π stacked associates, but no G‐quadruplexes, as evidenced by CD spectroscopy.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbones. Part 19.

The A*[s]U⁽*⁾ dinucleosides 1 and 2 form thermoreversible gels in organic solvents. The basis of the gelation is the formation of linear aggregates by base pairing following desolvation of the nucleobases. This is evidenced by the absence of gel formation by the C(6)‐deaminated analogue 3 of 1 , the correlation of gelation with the anti‐conformation, as preferred for 1 , and the temperature‐, concentration‐, and time‐dependent CD spectra. The gels were also characterized by the minimum gelation concentration, the gel–sol transition (melting) temperature, and rheological properties.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 30

The protected G*[s ]C*[s ]U*[s ]A*[s ]U*[s ]A*[s ]G*[s ]C* octanucleoside 24 was prepared by S‐alkylation of the thiolate derived from tetranucleoside 23 with the methanesulfonate 22 , and transformed to the silylated and isopropylidenated 25 , and further into the fully deprotected octanucleoside 26 . Compound 22 was derived from the methoxytrityl‐protected tetranucleoside 21 , and 21 was obtained by S‐alkylation of the thiolate derived from the dinucleoside 19 with methanesulfonate 17 derived from 16 by detritylation and mesylation. Similarly, tetranucleoside 23 resulted from S‐alkylation of the thiolate derived from 18 with the methanesulfonate 20 derived from 19 . Dinucleosides 16 and 18 resulted from S‐alkylation of the thiolate derived from the known cytidine‐derived thioacetate 15 with the C(8)‐substituted guanosine‐derived methanesulfonates 12 and 14 , respectively, that were synthesized from the protected precursors 4 and 7 by formylation, reduction, protection, and mesylation. The structures of the duplexes of 25 and 26 were calculated using AMBER* modelling and based on the known structure of the core tetranucleoside U*[s ]A*[s ]U*[s ]A*. The former shows a helix with a bent helix axis and strong buckle and propeller twists, whereas the latter is a regular, right‐handed, and apparently strain‐free helix. In agreement with modelling, the silylated and isopropylidenated octanucleoside 25 in (CDCl₂)₂ solution led to a mixture of associated species possessing at most four Watson? Crick base pairs, while the fully deprotected octanucleoside 26 in aqueous medium forms a duplex, as evidenced by a decreasing CD absorption upon increasing the temperature and by a UV‐melting curve with a melting temperature of ca. 10° below the one of the corresponding RNA octamer, indicating cooperativity between base pairing and base‐pair stacking.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 15

The self‐complementary (Z)‐configured U*[c_e]A⁽*⁾ dinucleotide analogues 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 , and 16 , and the A*[c_e]U⁽*⁾ dimers 19, 21, 23, 25, 27 , and 29 were prepared by partial hydrogenation of the corresponding ethynylene linked dimers. Photolysis of 14 led to the (E)‐alkene 17 . These dinucleotide analogues associate in CDCl₃ solution, as evidenced by NMR and CD spectroscopy. The thermodynamic parameters of the duplexation were determined by van't Hoff analysis. The (Z)‐configured U*[c_e]A⁽*⁾ dimers 14 and 16 form cyclic duplexes connected by Watson–Crick H‐bonds, the (E)‐configured U*[c_e]A dimer 17 forms linear duplexes, and the U*[c_e]A⁽*⁾ allyl alcohols 6, 8, 10 , and 12 form mixtures of linear and cyclic duplexes. The C(6/I)‐unsubstituted A*[c_e]U allyl alcohols 19 and 23 form linear duplexes, whereas the C(6/I)‐substituted A*[c_e]U* allyl alcohols 21 and 25 , and the C(5′/I)‐deoxy A*[c_e]U⁽*⁾ dimers 27 and 29 also form minor amounts of cyclic duplexes. The influence of intra‐ and intermolecular H‐bonding of the allyl alcohols and the influence of the base sequence upon the formation of cyclic duplexes are discussed.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone

The thiomethylene‐linked U*[s]U⁽*⁾ dimers 9 – 14 were synthesized by substitution of the 6‐[(mesyloxy)methyl]uridine 6 by the thiolate derived from the uridine‐5′‐thioacetates 7 and 8 followed by O‐deprotection. Similarly, the thiomethylene‐linked A*[s]A⁽*⁾ dimers 9 – 14 were obtained from the 8‐(bromomethyl)adenosine 15 and the adenosine‐5′‐thioacetates 16 and 17 . The concentration dependence of both H? N(3) of the U*[s]U⁽*⁾ dimers 9 – 14 evidences the formation of linear and cyclic duplexes, and of linear higher associates, C(8 or 6)CH₂OH and/or C(5′/II)OH groups favouring the formation of cyclic duplexes. The concentration dependence of the chemical shift for both H₂N? C(6) of the A*[s]A⁽*⁾ dimers 18 – 23 evidences the formation of mainly linear associates. The heteroassociation of U*[s]U⁽*⁾ to A*[s]A⁽*⁾ dimers is stronger than the homoassociation of U*[s]U⁽*⁾ dimers, as evidenced by diluting equimolar mixtures of 11 / 20 and 13 / 22 . A 1 : 1 stoichiometry of the heteroassociation is evidenced by a Job's plot for 11 / 20 , and by mole ratio plots for 9 / 18, 10 / 19, 12 / 21, 13 / 22 , and 14 / 23 .     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 14

The self‐complementary tetrameric propargyl triols 8, 14, 18 , and 21 were synthesized to investigate the duplex formation of self‐complementary, ethynylene‐linked UUAA, AAUU, UAUA, and AUAU analogues with integrated bases and backbone (ONIBs). The linear synthesis is based on repetitive Sonogashira couplings and C‐desilylations (34–72% yield), starting from the monomeric propargyl alcohols 9 and 15 and the iodinated nucleosides 3, 7, 11 , and 13 . Strongly persistent intramolecular H‐bonds from the propargylic OH groups to N(3) of the adenosine units prevent the gg‐type orientation of the ethynyl groups at C(5′). As such, an orientation is required for the formation of cyclic duplexes, this H‐bond prevents the formation of duplexes connected by all four base pairs. However, the central units of the UAUA and AAUU analogues 18 and 14 associate in CDCl₃/(D₆)DMSO 10 : 1 to form a cyclic duplex characterized by reverse Hoogsteen base pairing. The UUAA tetramer 8 forms a cyclic UU homoduplex, while the AUAU tetramer 21 forms only linear associates. Duplex formation of the O‐silylated UUAA and AAUU tetramers is no longer prevented. The self‐complementary UUAA tetramer 22 forms Watson–Crick‐ and Hoogsteen‐type base‐paired cyclic duplexes more readily than the sequence‐isomeric AAUU tetramer 23 , further illustrating the sequence selectivity of duplex formation.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 22

The tritylated and silylated self‐complementary A*[s]U*[s]A*[s]U* and U*[s]A*[s]U*[s]A* tetramers 18 and 24 , linked by thiomethylene groups (abbreviated as [s]) between a nucleobase and C(5′) of the neighbouring nucleoside unit were prepared by a linear synthesis based on S‐alkylation of 5′‐thionucleosides by 6‐(chloromethyl)uridines, 7 or 10 , or 8‐(chloromethyl)adenosines, 12 or 15 . The tetramers 18 and 24 were detritylated to the monoalcohols 19 and 25 , and these were desilylated to the diols 20 and 26 , respectively. The association of the tetramers 18 – 21 and 24 – 26 in CDCl₃ or in CDCl₃/(D₆)DMSO 95 : 5 was investigated by the concentration dependence of the chemical shifts for H? N(3) or H₂N? C(6). The formation of cyclic duplexes connected by four base pairs is favoured by the presence of one and especially of two OH groups. The diol 20 with the AUAU sequence prefers reverse‐Hoogsteen, and diol 26 with the UAUA sequence Watson–Crick base pairing. The structure of the cyclic duplex of 26 in CDCl₃ at 2° was derived by a combination of AMBER* modeling and simulated annealing with NMR‐derived distance and torsion‐angle restraints resulting in a Watson–Crick base‐paired right‐handed antiparallel helix showing large roll angles, especially between the centre base pairs, leading to a bent helix axis.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 17

The formation of cyclic duplexes (pairing) of known oxymethylene‐linked self‐complementary U*[o]A⁽*⁾ dinucleosides contrasts with the absence of pairing of the ethylene‐linked U*[c_a]A⁽*⁾ analogues. The origin of this difference, and the expected association of U*[x]A⁽*⁾ and A*[x]U⁽*⁾ dinucleosides with x=CH₂, O, or S was analysed. According to this analysis, pairing occurs via constitutionally isomeric Watson–Crick, reverse Watson–Crick, Hoogsteen, or reverse Hoogsteen H‐bonded linear duplexes. Each one of them may give rise to three diastereoisomeric cyclic duplexes, and each one of them can adopt three main conformations. The relative stability of all conformers with x=CH₂, O, or S were analysed. U*[x]A⁽*⁾ dinucleosides with x=CH₂ do not form stable cyclic duplexes, dinucleosides with x=O may form cyclic duplexes with a gg‐conformation about the C(4′)? C(5′) bond, and dinucleosides with x=S may form cyclic duplexes with a gt‐conformation about this bond. The temperature dependence of the chemical shift of H? N(3) of the self‐complementary, oxymethylene‐linked U*[o]A⁽*⁾ dinucleosides 1 – 6 in CDCl₃ in the concentration range of 0.4–50 mM evidences equilibria between the monoplex, mainly linear duplexes, and higher associates for 3 , between the monoplex and cyclic duplexes for 6 , and between the monoplex, linear, and cyclic duplexes as well as higher associates for 1, 2, 4 , and 5 . The self‐complementary, thiomethylene‐linked U*[s]A⁽*⁾ dinucleosides 27 – 32 and the sequence isomeric A*[s]U⁽*⁾ analogues 33 – 38 were prepared by S‐alkylation of the 6‐(mesyloxymethyl)uridine 12 and the 8‐(bromomethyl)adenosine 22 . The required thiolates were prepared in situ from the C(5′)‐acetylthio derivatives 9, 15, 19 , and 25 . The association in CHCl₃ of the thiomethylene‐linked dinucleoside analogues was studied by ¹H‐NMR and CD spectroscopy, and by vapour‐pressure osmometric determination of the apparent molecular mass. The U*[s]A⁽*⁾ alcohols 28, 30 , and 31 form cyclic duplexes connected by Watson–Crick H‐bonds, while the fully protected dimers 27 and 29 form mainly linear duplexes and higher associates. The diol 32 forms mainly cyclic duplexes in solution and corrugated ribbons in the solid state. The nucleobases of crystalline 32 form reverse Hoogsteen H‐bonds, and the resulting ribbons are cross‐linked by H‐bonds between HOCH₂? C(8/I) and N(3/I). Among the A*[s]U⁽*⁾ dimers, only the C(8/I)‐hydroxymethylated 37 forms (mainly) a cyclic duplex, characterized by reverse Hoogsteen base pairing. The dimers 34 – 36 form mainly linear duplexes and higher associates. Dimers 34 and particularly 38 gelate CHCl₃. Temperature‐dependent CD spectra of 28, 30, 31 , and 37 evidence π‐stacking in the cyclic duplexes. Base stacking in the particularly strongly associating diol 32 in CHCl₃ solution is evidenced by a melting temperature of ca. 2°.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 13

The self‐complementary UA and AU dinucleotide analogues 41 – 45, 47, 48 , and 51 – 60 were prepared by Sonogashira coupling of 6‐iodouridines with C(5′)‐ethynylated adenosines and of 8‐iodoadenosines with C(5′)‐ethynylated uridines. The dinucleotide analogues associate in CDCl₃ solution. The C(6/I)‐unsubstituted AU dimers 51 and 54 prefer an anti‐oriented uracilyl group and form stretched linear duplexes. The UA propargyl alcohols 41 and 43 – 45 possess a persistent intramolecular O(5′/I)? H???N(3/I) H‐bond and, thus, a syn‐oriented adeninyl and a gt‐ or tg‐oriented ethynyl moiety; they form corrugated linear duplexes. All other dimers form cyclic duplexes characterized by syn‐oriented nucleobases. The preferred orientation of the ethynyl moiety (the C(4′),C(5′) torsion angle) defines a conformation between gg and one where the ethynyl group eclipses O(4′/I). The UA dimers 42, 47 , and 48 form Watson–Crick H‐bonds, the AU dimers 56 and 58 – 60 H‐bonds of the Watson–Crick‐type, the AU dimers 53 and 55 reverse‐Hoogsteen, and 57 Hoogsteen H‐bonds. The pairing mode depends on the substituent of C(5′/I) (H, OSiⁱPr₃; OH) and on the H‐bonds of HO? C(5′/I) in the AU dimers. Association constants were derived from the concentration‐dependent chemical shift for HN(3) of the uracilyl moiety; they vary from 45–104 M ^?1 for linear duplexes to 197–2307 M ^?1 for cyclic duplexes. The thermodynamic parameters were determined by van't Hoff analysis of the temperature‐dependence of the (concentration‐dependent) chemical shift for HN(3) of the uracilyl moiety. Neglecting stacking energies, one finds an average energy of 3.5–4.0 kcal/mol per intermolecular H‐bond. Base stacking is evidenced by the temperature‐dependent CD spectra. The crystal structure of 54 shows two antiparallel chains of dimers connected by Watson‐Crick H‐bonds. The chains are bridged by a strong H‐bond between the propargylic OH and O?C(4) and by weak reverse A ? A Hoogsteen H‐bonds.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 28

The protected hydrazide‐linked uracil‐ and adenine‐derived tetranucleoside analogues 17, 19 , and 21 were synthesized in solution by coupling the dimeric hydrazines 6 and 10 with the carboxylic acids 7, 11 , and 16 . These hydrazines and acids were obtained by partially deprotecting the hydrazines 5, 9 , and 15 , and these were prepared by coupling the hydrazines 3 and 14 with the carboxylic acids 4 and 8 . The crystal structure analysis of the fully protected UU dimer 5 showed the formation of an antiparallel cyclic duplex with the uracil units H‐bonded via H? N(3) and O?C(2). Stacking interactions were observed between the uracil units with a buckle twist of 30.9°, and between the uracil unit II and the fluoren‐9‐yl group of Fmoc (=9H‐fluoren‐9‐yl)methoxycarbonyl). The hydrazide H? N(3′) and the C?O group of Fmoc form an intramolecular H‐bond. The uracil‐ and adenine‐derived, water‐soluble hydrazide‐linked self‐complementary octamers 23 – 32 and the non‐self‐complementary uracil derived decamer 33 were obtained by coupling the carboxylic acids 4 and 8 on a solid support. ¹H‐NMR Analysis in CDCl₃, mixtures of CDCl₃ and (D₆)DMSO, and (D₈)THF showed that the partially deprotected dimers 5, 6, 12 , and 13 form weakly associated linear duplexes. The partially deprotected tetramers 17 and 18 do not associate. The hydrazide‐linked octamers 23 – 32 do not stack in aqueous solution, and the non‐self‐complementary decamer 33 does not stack with the complementary strands of DNA 43 and RNA 42 . The Cbz‐protected amide‐linked octamers 51 – 56 derived from uracil, adenine, cytosine, and guanine were obtained as the main products by solid‐phase synthesis from the carboxylic acids 46 – 49 . The fully deprotected amide‐linked octamers proved insoluble, and could neither be purified nor analysed.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 16

The self‐complementary, ethylene‐linked U*[c_a]A⁽*⁾ dinucleotide analogues 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 , and 18 , and the sequence‐isomeric A*[c_a]U⁽*⁾ analogues 20, 22, 24, 26, 28 , and 30 were obtained by Pd/C‐catalyzed hydrogenation of the corresponding, known ethynylene‐linked dimers. The association of the ethylene‐linked dimers was investigated by NMR and CD spectroscopy. The U*[c_a]A⁽*⁾ dimers form linear duplexes and higher associates (K between 29 and 114M ^?1). The A*[c_a]U⁽*⁾ dimers, while associating more strongly (K between 88 and 345M ^?1), lead mostly to linear duplexes and higher associates; they form only minor amounts of cyclic duplexes. The enthalpy–entropy compensation characterizing the association of the U*[c_x]A⁽*⁾ and A*[c_x]U⁽*⁾ dimers (x=y, e, and a) is discussed.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone (ONIB). Part 31

The self‐complementary guanosine‐ and cytidine‐derived aminomethylene‐linked C*[n ]G dinucleoside 9 was synthesized by reductive amination of aldehyde 3 with an iminophosphorane derived from azide 7 . Deacylation of 9 gave the isopropylidene‐protected dinucleoside 10 . The sequence‐isomeric G*[n ]C dinucleoside 11 was similarly prepared from aldehyde 8 and azide 5 , and deacylated to 12 . The association of 10 and 12 in CHCl₃ or in CHCl₃/DMSO mixtures, and the structure of the associates were studied by ¹H‐NMR, ESI‐MS, CD, and vapor pressure osmometry (VPO). Broad ¹H‐NMR signals of dinucleosides 10 and 12 evidence an equilibrium between duplexes and quadruplexes (Hoogsteen base pairing between the Watson? Crick base‐paired duplexes). The quadruplex dominates for the G*[n ]C dinucleoside 12 between ?50° and room temperature. The sequence‐isomeric C*[n ]G 10 forms mostly only a cyclic duplex in CDCl₃ and in CDCl₃/(D₆)DMSO 9 : 1.     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides. Part 26

The anthraquinone derivatives T‐x‐x ( x = 2, 4, and 8), possessing two cellobiosyl, cellotetraosyl, and cellooctaosyl chains, respectively, C‐glycosidically bonded at C(1) and C(8) were synthesised as potential mimics of cellulose I. The anthraquinone template enforces a parallel orientation of the cellodextrin chains at a distance corresponding to the one between the crystallographically independent chains of cellulose I, and the ethynyl and buta‐1,3‐diynyl linker units ensure an appropriate phase shift between them. The H‐bonding of the T‐x‐x mimics was analysed and compared to the one of the mono‐chained analogues T‐x and of the known cellulose II mimics N‐x‐x and N‐x where one or two cellodextrin chains are O‐glycosidically bonded to naphthalene‐1,8‐diethanol, or to naphthalene‐1‐ethanol. The OH signals of T‐x and T‐x‐x in solution in (D₆)DMSO were assigned on the basis of DQFCOSY, HSQC, and TOCSY (only of T‐4, T‐4‐4 , and T‐8‐8 ) spectra and on a comparison with the spectra of N‐x and N‐x‐x. Hydrogen bonding was analysed on the basis of the chemical shift of OH groups and its temperature dependence, coupling constants, SIMPLE ¹H‐NMR experiments, and ROESY spectra. T‐4‐4 and T‐8‐8 in (D₆)DMSO appear to adopt a V‐shape arrangement of the cellosyl chains, avoiding inter‐chain H‐bond interactions. The well‐resolved solid‐state CP/MAS ¹³C‐NMR spectra of the mono‐chained T‐x ( x = 1, 2, 4, and 8) show that only T‐8 is a close mimic of cellulose II. While the solid‐state CP/MAS ¹³C‐NMR spectrum of the C₁‐symmetric diglucoside T‐1‐1 is well‐resolved, the spectra of T‐2‐2 and T‐4‐4 show broad signals, and that of T‐8‐8 is rather well resolved. The spectrum of T‐8‐8 resembles that of cellulose I_β. A comparison of the X‐ray powder‐diffraction spectra of T‐8‐8 and T‐8 with those of celluloses confirms that T‐8‐8 is a H‐bond mimic of cellulose I and T‐8 one of cellulose II. Surprisingly, there is little difference between the CP/MAS ¹³C‐NMR spectra of the acetyl protected mono‐chained C‐glycosylated anthraquinone derivatives A‐x and the double‐chained A‐x‐x ( x = 2, 4, and 8). The spectra of A‐4 and A‐4‐4 resemble strongly the one of cellulose triacetate I ( CTA I ). The (less well‐resolved) spectra of the cellooctaosides A‐8 and A‐8‐8 , however, resemble the one of CTA II . The similarity between the solid‐state CP/MAS ¹³C‐NMR spectra of A‐4 and A‐4‐4 to the one of CTA I , and of A‐8 and A‐8‐8 to the one of CTA II is opposite to the observations in the acetylated cellodextrin series. The mono‐chained A‐x cellulose triacetate mimics 21 ( A‐2 ), 32 ( A‐4 ), and 55 ( A‐8 ) were synthesised by Sonogashira coupling of the cellooligosyl‐ethynes 15, 28 , and 50 , followed by selective deacetylation. Complete deacetylation provided the corresponding T‐x mimics. The double‐chained A‐x‐x mimics 24 ( A‐2‐2 ), 35 ( A‐4‐4 ), and 58 ( A‐8‐8 ) were prepared from A‐x by triflation and Sonogashira coupling with the cellosyl‐buta‐1,3‐diynes 19, 31 , and 53 . Their deacetylation provided the corresponding T‐x‐x mimics 25, 36 , and 59 . The cellooligosyl‐ethynes and cellooligosyl‐buta‐1,3‐diynes required for the Sonogashira coupling were prepared by stepwise glycosylation of the partially O‐benzylated β‐cellobiosyl‐ethyne and β‐cellobiosyl‐buta‐1,3‐diyne 13 and 17 , respectively, with the cellobiosyl donor 2 and the cellohexaosyl donor 47 .     

Nucleotides. Part LXXVIII

Several N(‐hydroxyalkyl)‐2,4‐dinitroanilines were transformed into their phosphoramidites (see 5 and 6 in Scheme 1) in view of their use as fluorescence quenchers, and modified 2‐aminobenzamides (see 9, 10, 18 , and 19 in Scheme 1) were applied in model reactions as fluorophors to determine the relative fluorescence quantum yields of the 3′‐Aba and 5′‐Dnp‐3′‐Aba conjugates (Aba=aminobenzamide, Dnp=dinitroaniline). Thymidine was alkylated with N‐(2‐chloroethyl)‐2,4‐dinitroaniline ( 24 ) to give 25 which was further modified to the building blocks 27 and 28 (Scheme 3). The 2‐amino group in 29 was transformed by diazotation into the 2‐fluoroinosine derivative 30 used as starting material for several reactions at the pyrimidine nucleus (→ 31, 33 , and 35 ; Scheme 4). The 3′,5′‐di‐O‐acetyl‐2′‐deoxy‐N²‐[(dimethylamino)methylene]guanosine ( 37 ) was alkylated with methyl and ethyl iodide preferentially at N(1) to 43 and 44 , and similarly reacted N‐(2‐chloroethyl)‐2,4‐dinitroaniline ( 24 ) to 38 and the N‐(2‐iodoethyl)‐N‐methyl analog 50 to 53 (Scheme 5). The 2′‐deoxyguanosine derivative 53 was transformed into 3′,5′‐di‐O‐acetyl‐2‐fluoro‐1‐{2‐[(2,4‐dinitrophenyl)methylamino]ethyl}inosine ( 54 ; Scheme 5) which reacted with 2,2′‐[ethane‐1,2‐diylbis(oxy)]bis[ethanamine] to modify the 2‐position with an amino spacer resulting in 56 (Scheme 6). Attachment of the fluorescein moiety 55 at 56 via a urea linkage led to the doubly labeled 2′‐deoxyguanosine derivative 57 (Scheme 6). Dimethoxytritylation to 58 and further reaction to the 3′‐succinate 59 and 3′‐phosphoramidite 60 afforded the common building blocks for the oligonucleotide synthesis (Scheme 6). Similarly, 30 reacted with N‐(2‐aminoethyl)‐2,4‐dinitroaniline ( 61 ) thus attaching the quencher at the 2‐position to yield 62 (Scheme 7). The amino spacer was again attached at the same site via a urea bridge to form 64 . The labeling of 64 with the fluorescein derivative 55 was straigthforward giving 65 . and dimethoxytritylation to 66 and further phosphitylation to 67 followed known procedures (Scheme 7). Several oligo‐2′‐deoxynucleotides containing the doubly labeled 2′‐deoxyguanosines at various positions of the chain were formed in a DNA synthesizer, and their fluorescence properties and the T_ms in comparison to their parent duplexes were measured (Tables 1–5).