首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
To any field \Bbb K \Bbb K of characteristic zero, we associate a set (\mathbbK) (\mathbb{K}) and a group G0(\Bbb K) {\cal G}_0(\Bbb K) . Elements of (\mathbbK) (\mathbb{K}) are equivalence classes of families of Lie polynomials subject to associativity relations. Elements of G0(\Bbb K) {\cal G}_0(\Bbb K) are universal automorphisms of the adjoint representations of Lie bialgebras over \Bbb K \Bbb K . We construct a bijection between (\mathbbKG0(\Bbb K) (\mathbb{K})\times{\cal G}_0(\Bbb K) and the set of quantization functors of Lie bialgebras over \Bbb K \Bbb K . This construction involves the following steps.? 1) To each element v \varpi of (\mathbbK) (\mathbb{K}) , we associate a functor \frak a?\operatornameShv(\frak a) \frak a\mapsto\operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak a) from the category of Lie algebras to that of Hopf algebras; \operatornameShv(\frak a) \operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak a) contains U\frak a U\frak a .? 2) When \frak a \frak a and \frak b \frak b are Lie algebras, and r\frak a\frak b ? \frak a?\frak b r_{\frak a\frak b} \in\frak a\otimes\frak b , we construct an element ?v (r\frak a\frak b) {\cal R}^{\varpi} (r_{\frak a\frak b}) of \operatornameShv(\frak a)?\operatornameShv(\frak b) \operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak a)\otimes\operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak b) satisfying quasitriangularity identities; in particular, ?v(r\frak a\frak b) {\cal R}^\varpi(r_{\frak a\frak b}) defines a Hopf algebra morphism from \operatornameShv(\frak a)* \operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak a)^* to \operatornameShv(\frak b) \operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak b) .? 3) When \frak a = \frak b \frak a = \frak b and r\frak a ? \frak a?\frak a r_\frak a\in\frak a\otimes\frak a is a solution of CYBE, we construct a series rv(r\frak a) \rho^\varpi(r_\frak a) such that ?v(rv(r\frak a)) {\cal R}^\varpi(\rho^\varpi(r_\frak a)) is a solution of QYBE. The expression of rv(r\frak a) \rho^\varpi(r_\frak a) in terms of r\frak a r_\frak a involves Lie polynomials, and we show that this expression is unique at a universal level. This step relies on vanishing statements for cohomologies arising from universal algebras for the solutions of CYBE.? 4) We define the quantization of a Lie bialgebra \frak g \frak g as the image of the morphism defined by ?v(rv(r)) {\cal R}^\varpi(\rho^\varpi(r)) , where r ? \mathfrakg ?\mathfrakg* r \in \mathfrak{g} \otimes \mathfrak{g}^* .<\P>  相似文献   

2.
Let L\cal{L} be a positive definite bilinear functional, then the Uvarov transformation of L\cal{L} is given by  U(p,q) = L(p,q) + m p(a)[`(q)](a-1) +[`(m)] p([`(a)]-1)\,\mathcal{U}(p,q) = \mathcal{L}(p,q) + m\,p(\alpha)\overline{q}(\alpha^{-1}) + \overline{m}\,p(\overline{\alpha}^{-1}) [`(q)]([`(a)])\overline{q}(\overline{\alpha}) where $|\alpha| > 1, m \in \mathbb{C}$|\alpha| > 1, m \in \mathbb{C}. In this paper we analyze conditions on m for U\cal{U} to be positive definite in the linear space of polynomials of degree less than or equal to n. In particular, we show that m has to lie inside a circle in the complex plane defined by α, n and the moments associated with L\cal{L}. We also give an upper bound for the radius of this circle that depends only on α and n. This and other conditions on m are visualized for some examples.  相似文献   

3.
Let X \hookrightarrow[`(X)]{X \hookrightarrow \overline{X}} be an open immersion of smooth varieties over a field of characteristic p > 0 such that the complement is a simple normal crossing divisor and [`(Z)] í Z í [`(X)]{\overline{Z}\subseteq Z \subseteq \overline{X}} closed subschemes of codimension at least 2. In this paper, we prove that the canonical restriction functor between the categories of overconvergent F-isocrystals F-Isocf(X,[`(X)]) ? F-Isocf(X\Z,[`(X)]\[`(Z)]){F-{\rm Isoc}^\dagger(X,\overline{X}) \longrightarrow F-{\rm Isoc}^\dagger(X{\setminus}Z, \overline{X}{\setminus}\overline{Z})} is an equivalence of categories. We also give an application of our result to the equivalence of certain categories.  相似文献   

4.
Summary. Let K and [`(K)] \overline K be fields containing \Bbb Q {\Bbb Q} . We characterize pairs of additive functions f,g: K ?[`(K)] f,g: K \to \overline K satisfying a functional equation¶¶ g(xln) = f(xl)n     \textrespectively        g(xln) = Axln + xln-lf(xl) g(x^{ln}) = f(x^l)^n \quad \text{respectively} \qquad g(x^{ln}) = Ax^{ln} + x^{ln-l}f(x^l) ,¶where n ? \Bbb Z \{0,1} n \in {\Bbb Z} \setminus \{0,1\} , l ? \Bbb N l\in {\Bbb N} and A ? K A \in K .  相似文献   

5.
Let f be a cusp form of the Hecke space \frak M0(l,k,e){\frak M}_0(\lambda,k,\epsilon) and let L f be the normalized L-function associated to f. Recently it has been proved that L f belongs to an axiomatically defined class of functions [`(S)]\sharp\bar{\cal S}^\sharp . We prove that when λ ≤ 2, L f is always almost primitive, i.e., that if L f is written as product of functions in [`(S)]\sharp\bar{\cal S}^\sharp , then one factor, at least, has degree zeros and hence is a Dirichlet polynomial. Moreover, we prove that if l ? {?2,?3,2}\lambda\notin\{\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3},2\} then L f is also primitive, i.e., that if L f = F 1 F 2 then F 1 (or F 2) is constant; for l ? {?2,?3,2}\lambda\in\{\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3},2\} the factorization of non-primitive functions is studied and examples of non-primitive functions are given. At last, the subset of functions f for which L f belongs to the more familiar extended Selberg class S\sharp{\cal S}^\sharp is characterized and for these functions we obtain analogous conclusions about their (almost) primitivity in S\sharp{\cal S}^\sharp .  相似文献   

6.
We give sufficient conditions on numbers d and m such that a linear system of degree m on the normalization C of a plane curve [`(C)]\overline {C} of degree d which is in a certain sense not too singular is in the natural way induced by either a pencil of lines or a pencil of conics in the plane. Those results generalize results on nodal and cuspidal plane curves and seem to complement the recent results of [2]. We present a new approach via the geometry of curves in \Bbb P1×\Bbb P2{\Bbb P}_1\times {\Bbb P}_2.  相似文献   

7.
Let W ì \Bbb Rn\Omega \subset {\Bbb R}^n be a smooth domain and let u ? C0(W).u \in C^0(\Omega ). A classical result of potential theory states that¶¶-òSr([`(x)]) u(x)ds(x)=u([`(x)])-\kern-5mm\int\limits _{S_{r}(\bar x)} u(x)d\sigma (x)=u(\bar x)¶¶for every [`(x)] ? W\bar x\in \Omega and r > 0r>0 if and only if¶¶Du=0 in W.\Delta u=0 \hbox { in } \Omega.¶¶Here -òSr([`(x)]) u(x)ds(x)-\kern-5mm\int\limits _{S_{r}(\bar x)} u(x)d\sigma (x) denotes the average of u on the sphere Sr([`(x)])S_r(\bar x) of center [`(x)]\bar x and radius r. Our main result, which is a "localized" version of the above result, states:¶¶Theorem. Let u ? W2,1(W)u\in W^{2,1}(\Omega ) and let x ? Wx\in \Omega be a Lebesgue point of Du\Delta u such that¶¶-òSr([`(x)]) u d s- a = o(r2)-\kern-5mm\int\limits _{S_{r}(\bar x)} u d \sigma - \alpha =o(r^2)¶¶for some a ? \Bbb R\alpha \in \Bbb R and all sufficiently small r > 0.r>0. Then¶¶Du(x)=0.\Delta u(x)=0.  相似文献   

8.
Let \frak X, \frak F,\frak X\subseteqq \frak F\frak {X}, \frak {F},\frak {X}\subseteqq \frak {F}, be non-trivial Fitting classes of finite soluble groups such that G\frak XG_{\frak {X}} is an \frak X\frak {X}-injector of G for all G ? \frak FG\in \frak {F}. Then \frak X\frak {X} is called \frak F\frak {F}-normal. If \frak F=\frak Sp\frak {F}=\frak {S}_{\pi }, it is known that (1) \frak X\frak {X} is \frak F\frak {F}-normal precisely when \frak X*=\frak F*\frak {X}^{\ast }=\frak {F}^{\ast }, and consequently (2) \frak F í \frak X\frak N\frak {F}\subseteq \frak {X}\frak {N} implies \frak X*=\frak F*\frak {X}^{\ast }=\frak {F}^{\ast }, and (3) there is a unique smallest \frak F\frak {F}-normal Fitting class. These assertions are not true in general. We show that there are Fitting classes \frak F\not = \frak Sp\frak {F}\not =\frak {S}_{\pi } filling property (1), whence the classes \frak Sp\frak {S}_{\pi } are not characterized by satisfying (1). Furthermore we prove that (2) holds true for all Fitting classes \frak F\frak {F} satisfying a certain extension property with respect to wreath products although there could be an \frak F\frak {F}-normal Fitting class outside the Lockett section of \frak F\frak {F}. Lastly, we show that for the important cases \frak F=\frak Nnn\geqq 2\frak {F}=\frak {N}^{n},\ n\geqq 2, and \frak F=\frak Sp1?\frak Sprpi \frak {F}=\frak {S}_{p_{1}}\cdots \frak {S}_{p_{r}},\ p_{i} primes, there is a unique smallest \frak F\frak {F}-normal Fitting class, which we describe explicitly.  相似文献   

9.
We integrate the Lifting cocycles Y2n+1, Y2n+3, Y2n+5,? ([Sh1,2]) \Psi_{2n+1}, \Psi_{2n+3}, \Psi_{2n+5},\ldots\,([\rm Sh1,2]) on the Lie algebra Difn of holomorphic differential operators on an n-dimensional complex vector space to the cocycles on the Lie algebra of holomorphic differential operators on a holomorphic line bundle l \lambda on an n-dimensional complex manifold M in the sense of Gelfand--Fuks cohomology [GF] (more precisely, we integrate the cocycles on the sheaves of the Lie algebras of finite matrices over the corresponding associative algebras). The main result is the following explicit form of the Feigin--Tsygan theorem [FT1]:¶¶ H·Lie(\frak g\frak lfin(Difn);\Bbb C) = ù·(Y2n+1, Y2n+3, Y2n+5,? ) H^\bullet_{\rm Lie}({\frak g}{\frak l}^{\rm fin}_\infty({\rm Dif}_n);{\Bbb C}) = \wedge^\bullet(\Psi_{2n+1}, \Psi_{2n+3}, \Psi_{2n+5},\ldots\,) .  相似文献   

10.
Following D. Manderscheid, we describe the supercuspidal representations of the n-fold metaplectic cover [`(SL2(F))]\overline {SL_2(F)}, where F is a p-adic field with (p, 2n) = 1. We prove a "Frobenius formula" for the character of a supercuspidal representation of [`(SL2(F))]\overline {SL_2(F)}. Using this formula, we obtain a character relation between corresponding supercuspidal representations of [`(SL2(F))]\overline {SL_2(F)} and of SL2(F)> in the case n = 2.  相似文献   

11.
D'après [6] et [7] l'anneau des entiers du corps quadratique Q(?d), d \not = -3{\bf Q}(\sqrt {d}), d \not = -3, possède une extension cyclique cubique monogène (de discriminant 1) si, et seulement si, l'équation diophantienne¶¶ 4m3 = y2d + 274m^3 = y^2d + 27 a une solution avec d \not o 21d \not \equiv 21 (mod 36) et m \not o 3m \not \equiv 3 (mod 9).¶¶ On démontre ici que pour qu'une telle extension existe il faut que 3 divise h (d) et, lorsque d o 1d \equiv 1 (mod 8), d'où (2) = \frak p1\frak p2(2) = \frak p_1\frak p_2 où \frak p1\frak p_1 et \frak p2\frak p_2 sont deux idéaux premiers distincts de Ad, que la classe [\frak p1][\frak p_1] de \frak p1\frak p_1 dans le groupe de classes de Q(?d){\bf Q}(\sqrt {d}) ne soit pas un cube. Pour |d||d| < 100'000 cela élimine 68,37 % des valeurs restantes, les valeurs éliminées passent ainsi de 90 à 97 %.¶ De plus d ne doit pas être de la forme pq ou -3 pq pour lesquels le symbole d'Aigner T(p *q)T(p \star q) vale -1. L'article comporte aussi deux corrections, des résultats complétant [6] et [7], parus dans une thèse, et d'autres (en particulier l'indépendance des critères et des résultats numériques) parus ailleurs.  相似文献   

12.
Abstract. For natural numbers n we inspect all factorizations n = ab of n with aba \le b in \Bbb N\Bbb N and denote by n=an bnn=a_n b_n the most quadratic one, i.e. such that bn - anb_n - a_n is minimal. Then the quotient k(n) : = an/bn\kappa (n) := a_n/b_n is a measure for the quadraticity of n. The best general estimate for k(n)\kappa (n) is of course very poor: 1/n £ k(n) £ 11/n \le \kappa (n)\le 1. But a Theorem of Hall and Tenenbaum [1, p. 29], implies(logn)-d-e £ k(n) £ (logn)-d(\log n)^{-\delta -\varepsilon } \le \kappa (n) \le (\log n)^{-\delta } on average, with d = 1 - (1+log2  2)/log2=0,08607 ?\delta = 1 - (1+\log _2 \,2)/\log 2=0,08607 \ldots and for every e > 0\varepsilon >0. Hence the natural numbers are fairly quadratic.¶k(n)\kappa (n) characterizes a specific optimal factorization of n. A quadraticity measure, which is more global with respect to the prime factorization of n, is k*(n): = ?1 £ ab, ab=n a/b\kappa ^*(n):= \textstyle\sum\limits \limits _{1\le a \le b, ab=n} a/b. We show k*(n) ~ \frac 12\kappa ^*(n) \sim \frac {1}{2} on average, and k*(n)=W(2\frac 12(1-e) log n/log 2n)\kappa ^*(n)=\Omega (2^{\frac {1}{2}(1-\varepsilon ) {\log}\, n/{\log} _2n})for every e > 0\varepsilon>0.  相似文献   

13.
Let G be a reductive algebraic group defined over \Bbb Q {\Bbb Q} . Let P, P' be parabolic subgroups of G, defined over \Bbb Q {\Bbb Q} , and let _boxclose_boxclose, a_P') t \in W({\frak a}_{P}, {\frak a}_{P'}) . In this paper we study the intertwining operator MP¢|P(t,l), l ? \frak a*P,\Bbb C M_{P' \vert P}(t,\lambda),\,\lambda \in {\frak a}^*_{P,{\Bbb C}} , acting in corresponding spaces of automorphic forms. One of the main results states that each matrix coefficient of MP¢|P(t,l) M_{P' \vert P}(t,\lambda) is a meromorphic function of order £ n + 1 \le n + 1 , where n = dim G. Using this result, we further investigate the rank one intertwining operators, in particular, we study the distribution of their poles.  相似文献   

14.
Let \mathbb Dn:={z=(z1,?, zn) ? \mathbb Cn:|zj| < 1,   j=1,?, n}{\mathbb {D}^n:=\{z=(z_1,\ldots, z_n)\in \mathbb {C}^n:|z_j| < 1, \;j=1,\ldots, n\}}, and let [`(\mathbbD)]n{\overline{\mathbb{D}}^n} denote its closure in \mathbb Cn{\mathbb {C}^n}. Consider the ring
Cr([`(\mathbbD)]n;\mathbb C) = {f:[`(\mathbbD)]n? \mathbb C:f   is   continuous   and  f(z)=[`(f([`(z)]))]   (z ? [`(\mathbbD)]n)}C_{\rm r}(\overline{\mathbb{D}}^n;\mathbb {C}) =\left\{f: \overline{\mathbb{D}}^n\rightarrow \mathbb {C}:f \,\, {\rm is \,\, continuous \,\, and}\,\, f(z)=\overline{f(\overline{z})} \;(z\in \overline{\mathbb{D}}^n)\right\}  相似文献   

15.
The complex group algebra \Bbb CG{\Bbb C}G of a countable group G can be imbedded in the von Neumann algebra NG of G. If G is torsion-free, and if P is a finitely generated projective module over \Bbb CG{\Bbb C}G it is proved that the central-valued trace of NG?\Bbb CGPNG\otimes _{{\Bbb C}G}P, i.e. of an idempotent \Bbb CG{\Bbb C}G-matrix A defining P is equal to the canonical trace k(P)\kappa (P) times identity I. It follows that k(P)\kappa (P) characterizes the isomorphism type of NG?\Bbb CGPNG\otimes _{{\Bbb C}G}P.¶If k(P)\kappa (P) is an integer, e.g., if the weak Bass conjecture holds for G then NG?\Bbb C GPNG\otimes _{{\Bbb C} G}P is free. It is also shown that for certain classes of groups geometric arguments can be used to prove the Bass conjecture.  相似文献   

16.
Summary. It is shown that provided F and G are injective in every argument, the functional equation of generalized m ×n m \times n bisymmetry (m,n 3 2) (m,n \ge 2) ,¶¶ G(F1(x11, \hdots , x1n),\hdots , Fm(xm1,\hdots, xmn)) G(F_1(x_{11}, \hdots , x_{1n}),\hdots , F_m(x_{m1},\hdots, x_{mn})) ¶ = F(G1(x11,\hdots , xm1),\hdots , Gn(x1n,\hdots , xmn)) = F(G_1(x_{11},\hdots , x_{m1}),\hdots , G_n(x_{1n},\hdots , x_{mn})) ¶may be reduced to ¶¶ G([`(F)]1(u11, \hdots , u1n),\hdots ,[`(F)]m(um1,\hdots, umn)) G(\overline{F}_1(u_{11}, \hdots , u_{1n}),\hdots , \overline{F}_m(u_{m1},\hdots, u_{mn})) ¶ = F([`(G)]1(u11,\hdots , um1),\hdots ,[`(G)]n(u1n,\hdots , umn)) = F(\overline{G}_1(u_{11},\hdots , u_{m1}),\hdots ,\overline{G}_n(u_{1n},\hdots , u_{mn})) ¶where¶¶ Fi(xi1,\hdots , xin) = [`(F)]i (ji1(xi1),\hdots , jin(xin)), Gj(x1j, \hdots , xmj) = [`(G)]j(j1j (x1j),\hdots, jmj(xmj)) F_i(x_{i1},\hdots , x_{in}) = \overline{F}_i (\varphi_{i1}(x_{i1}),\hdots , \varphi_{in}(x_{in})), G_j(x_{1j}, \hdots , x_{mj}) = \overline{G}_j(\varphi_{1j} (x_{1j}),\hdots, \varphi_{mj}(x_{mj})) ,¶¶jij < /FORMULA > are surjections and < FORMULA > \varphi_{ij} are surjections and \overline{F}_i, \overline{G}_j < /FORMULA > are injective in every argument for all < FORMULA > are injective in every argument for all 1\le i \le m,\ 1\le j\le n $. The result is also shown to hold for a wider class of functional equations.  相似文献   

17.
Let a\alpha and b\beta be bounded measurable functions on the unit circle T. The singular integral operator Sa, bS_{\alpha ,\,\beta } is defined by Sa, b f = aPf + bQf(f ? L2 (T))S_{\alpha ,\,\beta } f = \alpha Pf + \beta Qf(f \in L^2 (T)) where P is an analytic projection and Q is a co-analytic projection. In the previous paper, the norm of Sa, bS_{\alpha ,\,\beta } was calculated in general, using a,b\alpha ,\beta and a[`(b)] + H\alpha \bar {\beta } + H^\infty where HH^\infty is a Hardy space in L (T).L^\infty (T). In this paper, the essential norm ||Sa, b ||e\Vert S_{\alpha ,\,\beta } \Vert _e of Sa, bS_{\alpha ,\,\beta } is calculated in general, using a[`(b)] + H + C\alpha \bar {\beta } + H^\infty + C where C is a set of all continuous functions on T. Hence if a[`(b)]\alpha \bar {\beta } is in H + CH^\infty + C then ||Sa, b ||e = max(||a|| , ||b|| ).\Vert S_{\alpha ,\,\beta } \Vert _e = \max (\Vert \alpha \Vert _\infty , \Vert \beta \Vert _\infty ). This gives a known result when a, b\alpha , \beta are in C.  相似文献   

18.
Suppose that f1, ?, fmf_1, \ldots , f_m satisfy functional equations of type¶¶ fi(zd) = Pi(z, fi(z))     or     fi(z) = Pi(z, fi(zd))f_i({z^d}) = P_i(z, f_i(z)) \quad {or} \quad f_i(z) = P_i(z, f_i({z^d})) ¶for i = 1, ?, mi = 1, \ldots , m, an integer d > 1 and polynomials Pi ? \Bbb C (z)[ y]P_i \in \Bbb C (z)[ {y}] with pairwise distinct partial degrees degy( P1), ?, degy( Pm)\deg _y( {P_1}), \ldots , \deg _y( {P_m}). Generalizing a result of Keiji Nishioka and using an idea of Kumiko Nishioka we show, that f1, ?, fmf_1, \ldots , f_m can only be algebraically dependent over \Bbb C (z)\Bbb C (z), if there is an index k ? { 1, ?, m}\kappa \in \{ {1, \ldots , m}\} such that fkf_{\kappa } is rational.  相似文献   

19.
We consider systems of partial differential equations with constant coefficients of the form ( R(Dx, Dy)f = 0, P(Dx)f = g), f,g ? C(W),\big ( R(D_x, D_y)f = 0, P(D_x)f = {g}\big ), f,g \in {C}^{\infty}(\Omega),, where R (and P) are operators in (n + 1) variables (and in n variables, respectively), g satisfies the compatibility condition R(Dx, Dy)g = 0  and  W ì \Bbb Rn+1R(D_x, D_y){g} = 0 \ {\rm and} \ \Omega \subset {\Bbb R}^{n+1} is open. Let R be elliptic. We show that the solvability of such systems for certain nonconvex sets W\Omega implies that any localization at ¥\infty of the principle part Pm of P is hyperbolic. In contrast to this result such systems can always be solved on convex open sets W\Omega by the fundamental principle of Ehrenpreis-Palamodov.  相似文献   

20.
Suppose that $1 < p < \infty $1 < p < \infty , q=p/(p-1)q=p/(p-1), and for non-negative f ? Lp(-¥ ,¥)f\in L^p(-\infty\! ,\infty ) and any real x we let F(x)-F(0)=ò0xf(tdtF(x)-F(0)=\int _0^xf(t)\ dt; suppose in addition that ò-¥ F(t)exp(-|t|) dt=0\int\limits _{-\infty }^\infty F(t)\exp (-|t|)\ dt=0. Moser's second one-dimensional inequality states that there is a constant CpC_p, such that ò-¥ exp[a |F(x)|q-|x|]  dxCp\int\limits _{-\infty }^\infty \exp [a |F(x)|^q-|x|] \ dx\le C_p for each f with ||f||p £ 1||f||_p\le 1 and every a £ 1a\le 1. Moreover the value a = 1 is sharp. We replace the operation connecting f with F by a more general integral operation; specifically we consider non-negative kernels K(t,x) with the property that xK(t,x) is homogeneous of degree 0 in t, x. We state an analogue of the inequality above for this situation, discuss some applications and consider the sharpness of the constant which replaces a.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号