Enumeration of pairs of permutations

Let π = (a₁, a₂, …, a_n), ? = (b₁, b₂, …, b_n) be two permutations of $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= {1, 2, …, n}}$. A rise of π is pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i < a_i+1; a fall is a pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i > a_i+1. Thus, for i = 1, 2, …, n ? 1, the two pairs a_i, a_i+1; b_i, b_i+1 are either both rises, both falls, the first a rise and the second a fall or the first a fall and the second a rise. These possibilities are denoted by RR, FF, RF, FR. The paper is concerned with the enumeration of pairs π, p with a given number of RR, FF, RF, FR. In particular if ω_n denotes the number of pairs with RR forbidden, it is proved that $\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}\text{=}\text{1}\text{?(z)}$, $\text{?(z) = ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{(-1)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$. More precisely if ω(n, k) denotes the number of pairs π, p with exactly k occurences of RR(or FF, RF, FR) then $\text{1 + ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$$\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{n?1}}{}_{\mathrm{k=0}}\text{ω(n, k)x}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(1 ? x)}\text{(?(z(1 ? x)) ? x)}$.     

A new form of trigonometric orthogonality and Gaussian-type quadrature

Gauss's (2n+1)-point trigonometric interpolation formula, based upon f(x_i), i = 1(1)2n+1, gives a trigonometric sum of the n^th order, S_2n+1(x = a₀ + ∑_jⁿ = 1^(a_jcos jx + b_jsin jx), which may be integrated to provide formulas for either direct quadrature or stepwise integration of differential equations having periodic (or near-periodic) solutions. An “orthogonal” trigonometric sum S_2r+1(x) is one that satisfies

$\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{a}}{}^{\mathrm{b}}\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{2r+1}}\text{(x)S}{}_{\mathrm{2r\prime +1}}\text{(x)dx=0, r′<r}$

and two other arbitrarily imposable conditions needed to make S_2r1(x) unique. Two proofs are given of a fundamental factor theorem for any S_2n+1(x) (somewhat different from that for polynomials) from which we derive 2r-point Gaussian-type quadrature formulas, r = [n/2] + 1, which are exact for any S_4r?1(x). We have

$\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{a}}{}^{\mathrm{b}}\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{4r?1(x)}}\text{dx=∑}{}_{\mathrm{j=1}}{}^{\mathrm{2r}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{4r?1}}\text{(x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{)}$

where the nodes x_j, j = 1(1)2r, are the zeros of the orthogonal S_2r+1(x). It is proven that A_j > 0 and that 2r-1 of the nodes must lie within the interval [a,b], and the remaining node (which may or may not be in [a,b]) must be real. Unlike Legendre polynomials, any [a′,b′] other than a translation of [a,b], requires different and unrelated sets of nodes and weights. Gaussian-type quadrature formulas are applicable to the numerical integration of the Gauss (2n+1)-point interpolation formulas, with extra efficiency when the latter are expressed in barycentric form. S_2r+1(x), x_jandA_j, j = 1(1)2r, were calculated for [a,b] = [0, π/4], 2r = 2 and 4, to single-precision accuracy.     

Orthogonal polynomials on the negative multinomial distribution

Orthogonal polynomials on the multivariate negative binomial distribution,

$\text{(1 + Θ)}{}^{\mathrm{?\alpha ?x}}\text{(}\text{π}\text{j=0}\text{p}\text{Θ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}{}^{\mathrm{x}}\text{j}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{!}\text{)}\text{Γ(α + x)}\text{Γ(α)}$

where α > 0, Θ₁ > 0, x = ΣΘ_i, x₀, x₁, …, x_p = 0,1, … are constructed and their properties studied.     

Numerical approximation of product integrals

A technique for the numerical approximation of matrix-valued Riemann product integrals is developed. For a ? x < y ? b, I_m(x, y) denotes

$\text{∫}\text{χ}\text{y}\text{∫}\text{χ}\text{v}{}_2\text{?}\text{∫}\text{χ}\text{v}{}_2\text{∏}\text{i=1}\text{m}\text{F(ν}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)dν}{}_1\text{dν}{}_2\text{?dν}{}_{\mathrm{m}}$

, and A_m(x, y) denotes an approximation of I_m(x, y) of the form

$\text{(y?x)}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{∑}\text{k=1}\text{n}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{∏}\text{i=1}\text{m}\text{F(χ}{}_{\mathrm{ik}}\text{)}$

, where a_k and y_ik are fixed numbers for i = 1, 2,…, m and k = 1, 2,…, N and x_ik = x + (y ? x)y_ik. The following result is established. If p is a positive integer, F is a function from the real numbers to the set of w × w matrices with real elements and F⁽¹⁾ exists and is continuous on [a, b], then there exists a bounded interval function H such that, if n, r, and s are positive integers, $\text{(b ? a)}\text{n}\text{= h < 1, x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= a + hi}\text{for}\text{i = 0, 1,…, n}\text{and}\text{0 < r ? s ? n}$, then

$\text{∏}\text{χ}{}_{\mathrm{r?}}\text{χ}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(I+F dχ)?}\text{∏}\text{i=r}\text{s}\text{I+}\text{∑}\text{j=1}\text{p}\text{I}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{(χ}{}_{\mathrm{i?1}}\text{,χ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$

$\text{=h}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{H(χ}{}_{\mathrm{r?1}}\text{,χ}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{)+O(h}{}^{\mathrm{p+1}}\text{)}$

Further, if F^(j) exists and is continuous on [a, b] for j = 1, 2,…, p + 1 and A is exact for polynomials of degree less than p + 1 ? j for j = 1, 2,…, p, then the preceding result remains valid when A_j is substituted for I_j.     

On differences and sums of integers,I

A set {b₁,b₂,…,b_i} ? {1,2,…,N} is said to be a difference intersector set if {a₁,a₂,…,a_s} ? {1,2,…,N}, j > ?N imply the solvability of the equation a_x ? a_y = b′; the notion of sum intersector set is defined similarly. The authors prove two general theorems saying that if a set {b₁,b₂,…,b_i} is well distributed simultaneously among and within all residue classes of small moduli then it must be both difference and sum intersector set. They apply these theorems to investigate the solvability of the equations ($\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{?}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{y}}\text{p}\text{= + 1}$, $\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{u}}\text{?}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{v}}\text{p}\text{) = ? 1}$, $\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{+}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{p}\text{) = + 1}$, $\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{+}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{z}}\text{p}\text{) = ? 1}$ (where ($\text{a}\text{p}$) denotes the Legendre symbol) and to show that “almost all” sets form both difference and sum intersector sets.     

The Dirichlet problem for the Kohn Laplacian on the Heisenberg group,I

For (x,y,t)∈$\text{R}$ⁿ × $\text{R}$ⁿ × $\text{R}$, denote $\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{=}\text{?}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ 2y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{, y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{=}\text{?}\text{?y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{? 2x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}$ and $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{=?}\text{1}\text{4}\text{∑}\text{j=1}\text{n}\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{j}}{}^2\text{+ Y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}{}^2\text{+}\text{?}\text{?t}$. When α = n ? 2q, $\text{L}$_a represents the action of the Kohn Laplacian □_b on q-forms on the Heisenberg group. For ?n < α < n, we construct a parametrix for the Dirichlet problem in smooth domains D near non-characteristic points of ?D. A point w of ?D is non-characteristic if one of X₁,…, X_n, Y₁,…, Y_n is transverse to ?D at w. This yields sharp local estimates in the Dirichlet problem in the appropriate non-isotropic Lipschitz classes. The main new tool is a “convolution calculus” of pseudo-differential operators that can be applied to the relevant layer potentials, for which the usual asymptotic composition formula is false. Characteristic points are treated in Part II.     

Temporally inhomogeneous scattering theory

A theory of scattering for the time dependent evolution equations $\text{du}\text{dt}\text{= iH}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{(t)u, j = 0, 1}$ (¹) is developed. The wave operators are defined in terms of the evolution operators U_j(t, s), which govern (¹). The scattering operator remains unitary. Sufficient conditions for existence and completeness of the wave operators are obtained; these are the main results. General properties, such as the chain rule and various intertwining relations, are also established. Applications include potential scattering (H₀(t) = ?Δ, Δ denoting the Laplacian, and H₁(t) = ?Δ + q(t, ·)) and scattering for second-order differential operators with coefficients constant in the spatial variable ($\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{(t) = ∑}{}_{\mathrm{m,\; k\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{mk}}{}^{\mathrm{(j)}}\text{(t)(}\text{?}{}^2\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{m}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{) + b}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{(t)}\text{for}\text{j = 0, 1}$).     

On an inequality of Tosio Kato for degenerate-elliptic operators

Let Ω be a domain in Rⁿ and T = ∑_{j,k = 1}ⁿ(?_j ? ib_j(x)) a_jk(x)(?_k ? ib_k(x)), where the a_jk and the b_j are real valued functions in $\text{C}{}^1\text{(Ω)}$, and the matrix (a_jk(x)) is symmetric and positive definite for every $\text{x ? Ω}$. If T₀ is the same as T but with b_j = 0, j = 1,…, n, and if u and Tu are in $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>loc</mtext>}}{}^1\text{(Ω)}$, then T. Kato has established the distributional inequality $\text{T}{}_0\text{¦ u ¦ ?}\text{Re[(sign}$ ū) Tu]. He then used this result to obtain selfadjointness results for perturbed operators of the form T ? q on Rⁿ. In this paper we shall obtain Kato's inequality for degenerate-elliptic operators with real coefficients. We then use this to get selfadjointness results for second order degenerate-elliptic operators on Rⁿ.     

Phase reconstruction from magnitude of band-limited multidimensional signals

In this paper, the problem of phase reconstruction from magnitude of multidimensional band-limited functions is considered. It is shown that any irreducible band-limited function f(z₁…,z_n), z_i ? $\text{C}$, i=1, …, n, is uniquely determined from the magnitude of f(x₁…,x_n): | f(x₁…,x_n)|, x_i ? $\text{R}$, i=1,…, n, except for (1) linear shifts: ^{i(α1z1+…+α_n2n+β}), β, α_i?$\text{R}$, i=1,…, n; and (2) conjugation: $\text{f}{}^1\text{(z}{}_1{}^1\text{,…,z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^1\text{)}$.     

A divided difference inequality for n-convex functions

For a₍₁₎ ? a₍₂₎ ? ··· ? a_(n) ? 0, b₍₁₎ ? b₍₂₎ ? ··· ? b_(n) ? 0, the ordered values of a_i, b_i, i = 1, 2,…, n, m fixed, m ? n, and p ? 1 it is shown that

$\text{∑}\text{1}\text{n}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{∑}\text{1}\text{m}\text{a}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}_{\mathrm{(i)}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}\text{∑}\text{1}\text{m?k?1}\text{b}{}^{\mathrm{q}}{}_{\mathrm{(i)}}\text{+}\text{b}{}^{\mathrm{q}}{}_{\mathrm{[m?k]}}\text{(k+1)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>q</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>q</mtext>}}$

where $\text{1}\text{p}\text{+}\text{1}\text{q}\text{= 1, b}{}_{\mathrm{[j]}}\text{= b}{}_{\mathrm{(j)}}\text{+ b}{}_{\mathrm{(j\; +\; 1)}}\text{+ ··· + b}{}_{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{,}\text{and}\text{k}$ is the integer such that $\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{(m\; ?\; k\; ?\; 1)}}\text{?}\text{b[m ? k]}\text{(k + 1)}$ and $\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{(m\; ?\; k)}}\text{<}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{[m\; ?\; k\; +\; 1]}}\text{k}$. The inequality is shown to be sharp. When p < 1 and a_(i)'s are in increasing order then the inequality is reversed.     

Asymptotic properties of general symmetric hyperbolic systems

Results on partition of energy and on energy decay are derived for solutions of the Cauchy problem $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0, u(0, x) = ?(x)}$. Here the A_j's are constant, k × k Hermitian matrices, x = (x₁,…, x_n), t represents time, and u = u(t, x) is a k-vector. It is shown that the energy of Mu approaches a limit $\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(?)}\text{as}\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$, where M is an arbitrary matrix; that there exists a sufficiently large subspace of data ?, which is invariant under the solution group U₀(t) and such that $\text{U}{}_0\text{(t)? = 0}\text{for}\text{¦ x ¦ ? a ¦ t ¦ ? R, a}\text{and}\text{R}$ depending on ? and that the local energy of nonstatic solutions decays as $\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$. More refined results on energy decay are also given and the existence of wave operators is established, considering a perturbed equation $\text{E(x)}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0,}\text{where}\text{¦ E(x) ? I ¦ = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1\; ?\; ?}}\text{)}$ at infinity.     

Extension de quelques theoremes sur les densites de series d'elements de n a des series de sous-ensembles finis de n

For a sequence A = {A_k} of finite subsets of N we introduce: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, where A(m) is the number of subsets A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}.The collection of all subsets of {1, …, n} together with the operation $\text{a ∪ b, (a ∩ b), (a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b)}$ constitutes a finite semi-group N^∪ (semi-group N^∩) (group $\text{N}{}^1$). For N^∪, N^∩ we prove analogues of the Erdös-Landau theorem: δ(A+B) ? δ(A)(1+(2λ)^?1(1?δ(A>))), where B is a base of N of the average order λ. We prove for $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ analogues of Schnirelmann's theorem (that δ(A) + δ(B) > 1 implies δ(A + B) = 1) and the inequalities λ ? 2h, where h is the order of the base.We introduce the concept of divisibility of subsets: a|b if b is a continuation of a. We prove an analog of the Davenport-Erdös theorem: if d(A) > 0, then there exists an infinite sequence {A_kr}, where A_kr | A_kr+1 for r = 1, 2, …. In Section 6 we consider for $\text{N∪, N∩, N1}$ analogues of Rohrbach inequality: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, where g(n) = min k over the subsets {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n}, such that every m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} can be expressed as m = a_i + a_j.Pour une série A = {A_k} de sous-ensembles finis de N on introduit les densités: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ où A(m) est le nombre d'ensembles A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}. L'ensemble de toutes les parties de {1, 2, …, n} devient, pour les opérations $\text{a ∪ b, a ∩ b, a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b}$, un semi-groupe fini N^∪, N^∩ ou un groupe N¹ respectivement. Pour N^∪, N^∩ on démontre l'analogue du théorème de Erdös-Landau: δ(A + B) ? δ(A)(1 + (2λ)^?1(1?δ(A))), où B est une base de N d'ordre moyen λ. On démontre pour $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ l'analogue du théorème de Schnirelmann (si δ(A) + δ(B) > 1, alors δ(A + B) = 1) et les inégalités λ ? 2h, où h est l'ordre de base. On introduit le rapport de divisibilité des enembles: a|b, si b est une continuation de a. On démontre l'analogue du théorème de Davenport-Erdös: si d(A) > 0, alors il existe une sous-série infinie {A_kr}, où A_kr|A_kr+1, pour r = 1, 2, … . Dans le Paragraphe 6 on envisage pour N^∪, $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ les analogues de l'inégalité de Rohrbach: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, où g(n) = min k pour les ensembles {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n} tels que pour tout m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} on a m = a_i + a_j.     

The probability that k positive integers are relatively r-prime

If r, k are positive integers, then $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}$ denotes the number of k-tuples of positive integers (x₁, x₂, …, x_k) with 1 ≤ x_i ≤ n and (x₁, x₂, …, x_k)_r = 1. An explicit formula for $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}$ is derived and it is shown that $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{1}\text{ζ(rk)}$.If S = {p₁, p₂, …, p_a} is a finite set of primes, then 〈S〉 = {p₁^a₁p₂^a₂…p_s^a_s; p_i ∈ S and a_i ≥ 0 for all i} and $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}$ denotes the number of k-tuples (x₁, x₃, …, x_k) with 1 ≤ x_i ≤ n and (x₁, x₂, …, x_k)_r ∈ 〈S〉. Asymptotic formulas for $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}$ are derived and it is shown that $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(p}{}_1\text{… p}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{ζ(rk)(p}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{? 1) … (p}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{? 1)}$.     

Inverse Hölder inequalities in one and several dimensions

We study certain functionals and obtain an inverse Hölder inequality for n functions f₁^a1,…,f_n^an (f_k concave, 1 dimension).We also prove a multidimensional inverse Hölder inequality for n functions f₁,…,f_n, where $\text{?}{}^2\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^2\text{? 0, i = 1,…, d, k = 1,…, n}$.Finally we give an inverse Minkowski inequality for concave functions.     

A note on the cross-correlation function between two binary maximal length linear sequences

Let {a_j}and {a_dj} be two binary maximal length linear sequences of period 2ⁿ?1. The cross-correlation function is defined as for t = 0, 1,…, 2ⁿ ? 2. We find the values and the number of occurrences of each value of C_d(t) when $\text{d =}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>n</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{?}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>n</mtext><mtext>4</mtext>}}\text{+}\text{1}\text{, n ≡}\text{0}$ (mod 8).     

Pairs of additive equations II. Large odd degree

Let k be an odd positive integer. Davenport and Lewis have shown that the equations

$\text{a}{}_1\text{x}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{+…+a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=0}$

with integer coefficients, have a nontrivial solution in integers x₁,…, x_N provided that

$\text{N?[36klog6k]}$

Here it is shown that for any ? > 0 and k > k₀(?) the equations have a nontrivial solution provided that

$\text{N?}\text{8}\text{log 2}\text{+?}\text{k log k.}$

     

Positive definite Hermitian matrices and reproducing kernels

Some quadratic identities associated with positive definite Hermitian matrices are derived by use of the theory of reproducing kernels. For example, the following identity is obtained: Let{A_j}^m_j=1 be N × N positive definite Hermitian matrices. Then, for any complex vector x ∈ $\text{C}$^N, we have the identity

$\text{x}{}^1\text{∑}\text{j=}\text{1}\text{m}\text{A}{}^{-1}{}_{\mathrm{j}}{}^{-1}\text{x = min}\text{∑}\text{j=}\text{1}\text{m}\text{x}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}$

. The minimum is taken here over all the decompositions x =∑^m_j=1x_j. This identity gives, in a sense, a precise converse for an inequality which was derived by T. Ando. Moreover, this paper shows that the sum of two reproducing kernels is naturally related to the harmonic-arithmetic-mean inequality for matrices and also that the geometric-arithmetic-mean inequality for matrices can be naturally interpreted in terms of tensor-product spaces.     

Factorization of fredholm operators on analytic functions

Let Ω be a simply connected domain in the complex plane, and $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, the space of functions which are defined and analytic on $\text{Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, if K is the operator on elements $\text{u(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{of}\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of the kernels k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by is the identity operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, then the operator I ? K may be factored in the form (I ? K)(M ? W) = (I ? ΠK)(M ? ΠW). Here, W is an operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of a kernel w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by Wu = ∝_an^tw(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠW is the operator; ΠWu = ∝_{an ? 1}w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠK is the operator; ΠKu = ∑_{i = 1}^{n ? 1} ∝_ai^tk_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) ds + ∝_{an ? 1}^tk_n(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. The operator M is of the form m(t, a₁, …, a_n)I, where $\text{m ? A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ and maps elements of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ into itself by multiplication. The function m is uniquely derived from K in the following manner. The operator K defines an operator $\text{K}{}^1$ on functions u in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$, by . A determinant $\text{δ(I ? K}{}^1\text{)}$ of the operator $\text{I ? K}{}^1$ is defined as an element $\text{m}{}^1\text{(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$. This is mapped into $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ by setting a_{n + 1} = t to give m(t, a₁, …, a_n). The operator I ? ΠK may be factored in similar fashion, giving rise to a chain factorization of I ? K. In some cases all the matrix kernels k_i defining K are separable in the sense that k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) = P_i(t, a₁, …, a_n) Q_i(s, a₁, …, a_n), where P_i is a 1 × p_i matrix and Q_i is a p_i × 1 matrix, each with elements in $\text{A(Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, explicit formulas are given for the kernels of the factors W. The various results are stated in a form allowing immediate extension to the vector-matrix case.     

Transcendental continued fractions

In a previous paper it was proven that given the continued fractions

$\text{A = a}{}_1\text{+}\text{1}\text{a}{}_2\text{+}\text{1}\text{a}{}_3\text{+… and B = b}{}_1\text{+}\text{1}\text{b}{}_2\text{+}\text{1}\text{b}{}_3\text{+…}$

where the a's and b's are positive integers, then A, B, A ± B, $\text{A}\text{B}$ and AB are irrational numbers if $\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{2}\text{> b}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{> a}{}_{\mathrm{n?1}}{}^{\mathrm{5n}}$ for all n sufficiently large, and transcendental numbers if for all n sufficiently large. Using a more direct approach it is proven in this paper that A, B, A ± B, $\text{A}\text{B}$ and AB are transcendental numbers if a_n > b_n > a_n?1^(n?1)2 for all n sufficiently large.