The unit graph of a left Artinian ring

Let R be a ring with non-zero identity and U(R) be the group of units of R. The unit graph of R, denoted by G(R), is a graph defined on the elements of R, and two distinct vertices r and s are adjacent if and only if r+s∈U(R). We investigate connectivity, diameter and the girth of the unit graph of a left Artinian ring. Also, by providing an algorithm, we determine when the unit graph of a finite ring is Hamiltonian.     

On the extension of vertex maps to graph homomorphisms

A reflexive graph is a simple undirected graph where a loop has been added at each vertex. If G and H are reflexive graphs and U⊆V(H), then a vertex map f:U→V(G) is called nonexpansive if for every two vertices x,y∈U, the distance between f(x) and f(y) in G is at most that between x and y in H. A reflexive graph G is said to have the extension property (EP) if for every reflexive graph H, every U⊆V(H) and every nonexpansive vertex map f:U→V(G), there is a graph homomorphism φ_f:H→G that agrees with f on U. Characterizations of EP-graphs are well known in the mathematics and computer science literature. In this article we determine when exactly, for a given “sink”-vertex s∈V(G), we can obtain such an extension φ_f;s that maps each vertex of H closest to the vertex s among all such existing homomorphisms φ_f. A reflexive graph G satisfying this is then said to have the sink extension property (SEP). We then characterize the reflexive graphs with the unique sink extension property (USEP), where each such sink extensions φ_f;s is unique.     

On the genus of generalized unit and unitary Cayley graphs of a commutative ring

Let R be a commutative ring, U(R) be the set of all unit elements of R, G be a multiplicative subgroup of U(R) and S be a non-empty subset of G such that S ^?1={s ^?1:?s∈S}?S. In [16], K. Khashyarmanesh et al. defined a graph of R, denoted by Γ(R,G,S), which generalizes both unit and unitary Cayley graphs of R. In this paper, we derive several bounds for the genus of Γ(R,U(R),S). Moreover, we characterize all commutative Artinian rings R for which the genus of Γ(R,U(R),S) is one. This leads to the characterization of all commutative Artinian rings whose unit and unitary Cayley graphs have genus one.     

The regular graph of a commutative ring

Let R be a commutative ring, let Z(R) be the set of all zero-divisors of R and Reg(R) = R\Z(R). The regular graph of R, denoted by G(R), is a graph with all elements of Reg(R) as the vertices, and two distinct vertices x, y ∈ Reg(R) are adjacent if and only if x+y ∈ Z(R). In this paper we show that if R is a commutative Noetherian ring and 2 ∈ Z(R), then the chromatic number and the clique number of G(R) are the same and they are 2 ⁿ , where n is the minimum number of prime ideals whose union is Z(R). Also, we prove that all trees that can occur as the regular graph of a ring have at most two vertices.     

Coloring graphs from random lists of size 2

Let G=G(n) be a graph on n vertices with girth at least g and maximum degree bounded by some absolute constant Δ. Assign to each vertex v of G a list L(v) of colors by choosing each list independently and uniformly at random from all 2-subsets of a color set C of size σ(n). In this paper we determine, for each fixed g and growing n, the asymptotic probability of the existence of a proper coloring φ such that φ(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V(G). In particular, we show that if g is odd and σ(n)=ω(n^1/(2g−2)), then the probability that G has a proper coloring from such a random list assignment tends to 1 as n→∞. Furthermore, we show that this is best possible in the sense that for each fixed odd g and each n≥g, there is a graph H=H(n,g) with bounded maximum degree and girth g, such that if σ(n)=o(n^1/(2g−2)), then the probability that H has a proper coloring from such a random list assignment tends to 0 as n→∞. A corresponding result for graphs with bounded maximum degree and even girth is also given. Finally, by contrast, we show that for a complete graph on n vertices, the property of being colorable from random lists of size 2, where the lists are chosen uniformly at random from a color set of size σ(n), exhibits a sharp threshold at σ(n)=2n.     

Total edge irregularity strength of complete graphs and complete bipartite graphs

A total edge irregular k-labelling ν of a graph G is a labelling of the vertices and edges of G with labels from the set {1,…,k} in such a way that for any two different edges e and f their weights φ(f) and φ(e) are distinct. Here, the weight of an edge g=uv is φ(g)=ν(g)+ν(u)+ν(v), i. e. the sum of the label of g and the labels of vertices u and v. The minimum k for which the graph G has an edge irregular total k-labelling is called the total edge irregularity strength of G.We have determined the exact value of the total edge irregularity strength of complete graphs and complete bipartite graphs.     

Distance-hereditary graphs and signpost systems

An ordered pair (U,R) is called a signpost system if U is a finite nonempty set, R⊆U×U×U, and the following axioms hold for all u,v,w∈U: (1) if (u,v,w)∈R, then (v,u,u)∈R; (2) if (u,v,w)∈R, then (v,u,w)∉R; (3) if u≠v, then there exists t∈U such that (u,t,v)∈R. (If F is a (finite) connected graph with vertex set U and distance function d, then U together with the set of all ordered triples (u,v,w) of vertices in F such that d(u,v)=1 and d(v,w)=d(u,w)−1 is an example of a signpost system). If (U,R) is a signpost system and G is a graph, then G is called the underlying graph of (U,R) if V(G)=U and xy∈E(G) if and only if (x,y,y)∈R (for all x,y∈U). It is possible to say that a signpost system shows a way how to travel in its underlying graph. The following result is proved: Let (U,R) be a signpost system and let G denote the underlying graph of (U,R). Then G is connected and every induced path in G is a geodesic in G if and only if (U,R) satisfies axioms (4)-(8) stated in this paper; note that axioms (4)-(8)-similarly as axioms (1)-(3)-can be formulated in the language of the first-order logic.     

The k-Dominating Graph

Given a graph G, the k-dominating graph of G, D _k (G), is defined to be the graph whose vertices correspond to the dominating sets of G that have cardinality at most k. Two vertices in D _k (G) are adjacent if and only if the corresponding dominating sets of G differ by either adding or deleting a single vertex. The graph D _k (G) aids in studying the reconfiguration problem for dominating sets. In particular, one dominating set can be reconfigured to another by a sequence of single vertex additions and deletions, such that the intermediate set of vertices at each step is a dominating set if and only if they are in the same connected component of D _k (G). In this paper we give conditions that ensure D _k (G) is connected.     

Hitting times for random walks on subdivision and triangulation graphs

Let G be a connected graph. The subdivision graph of G, denoted by S(G), is the graph obtained from G by inserting a new vertex into every edge of G. The triangulation graph of G, denoted by R(G), is the graph obtained from G by adding, for each edge uv, a new vertex whose neighbours are u and v. In this paper, we first provide complete information for the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the probability transition matrix of a random walk on S(G) (res. R(G)) in terms of those of G. Then we give an explicit formula for the expected hitting time between any two vertices of S(G) (res. R(G)) in terms of those of G. Finally, as applications, we show that, the relations between the resistance distances, the number of spanning trees and the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index of S(G) (res. R(G)) and G can all be deduced from our results directly.     

Strictly Deza line graphs

For a given graph G, its line graph L(G) is defined as the graph with vertex set equal to the edge set of G in which two vertices are adjacent if and only if the corresponding edges of G have exactly one common vertex. A k-regular graph of diameter 2 on υ vertices is called a strictly Deza graph with parameters (υ, k, b, a) if it is not strongly regular and any two vertices have a or b common neighbors. We give a classification of strictly Deza line graphs.     

Nombres de ramsey dans le cas orienté

Given two directed graphs G₁, G₂, the Ramsey number R(G₁,G₂) is the smallest integer n such that for any partition {U₁,U₂} of the arcs of the complete symmetric directed graph K¹_n, there exists an integer i such that the partial graph generated by U_i contains G_i as a subgraph. In this article, we determine R(P?_m,D?_n) and R(D?_m,D?_n) for some values of m and n, where P?_m denotes the directed path having m vertices and D?_m is obtained from P?_m by adding an arc from the initial vertex of P?_m to the terminal vertex.     

Geodetic and Steiner geodetic sets in 3-Steiner distance hereditary graphs

Let G be a connected graph and S⊆V(G). Then the Steiner distance of S, denoted by d_G(S), is the smallest number of edges in a connected subgraph of G containing S. Such a subgraph is necessarily a tree called a Steiner tree for S. The Steiner interval for a set S of vertices in a graph, denoted by I(S) is the union of all vertices that belong to some Steiner tree for S. If S={u,v}, then I(S) is the interval I[u,v] between u and v. A connected graph G is 3-Steiner distance hereditary (3-SDH) if, for every connected induced subgraph H of order at least 3 and every set S of three vertices of H, d_H(S)=d_G(S). The eccentricity of a vertex v in a connected graph G is defined as e(v)=max{d(v,x)|x∈V(G)}. A vertex v in a graph G is a contour vertex if for every vertex u adjacent with v, e(u)?e(v). The closure of a set S of vertices, denoted by I[S], is defined to be the union of intervals between pairs of vertices of S taken over all pairs of vertices in S. A set of vertices of a graph G is a geodetic set if its closure is the vertex set of G. The smallest cardinality of a geodetic set of G is called the geodetic number of G and is denoted by g(G). A set S of vertices of a connected graph G is a Steiner geodetic set for G if I(S)=V(G). The smallest cardinality of a Steiner geodetic set of G is called the Steiner geodetic number of G and is denoted by sg(G). We show that the contour vertices of 3-SDH and HHD-free graphs are geodetic sets. For 3-SDH graphs we also show that g(G)?sg(G). An efficient algorithm for finding Steiner intervals in 3-SDH graphs is developed.     

The vertex linear arboricity of distance graphs

A distance graph is a graph G(R,D) with the set of all points of the real line as vertex set and two vertices u,v∈R are adjacent if and only if |u-v|∈D where the distance set D is a subset of the positive real numbers. Here, the vertex linear arboricity of G(R,D) is determined when D is an interval between 1 and δ. In particular, the vertex linear arboricity of integer distance graphs G(D) is discussed, too.     

Graph Equation for Line Graphs and m-Step Graphs

Given a graph G, the m-step graph of G, denoted by S _m (G), has the same vertex set as G and an edge between two distinct vertices u and v if there is a walk of length m from u to v. The line graph of G, denoted by L(G), is a graph such that the vertex set of L(G) is the edge set of G and two vertices u and v of L(G) are adjacent if the edges corresponding to u and v share a common end vertex in G. We characterize connected graphs G such that S _m (G) and L(G) are isomorphic.     

An upper bound for the k-domination number of a graph

The k-domination number of a graph G, γk(G), is the least cardinality of a set U of verticies such that any other vertex is adjacent to at least k vertices of U. We prove that if each vertex has degree at least k, then γk(G) ≤ kp/(k + 1).     

Representing Graphs in Steiner Triple Systems

Let G =  (V, E) be a simple graph and let T =  (P, B) be a Steiner triple system. Let φ be a one-to-one function from V to P. Any edge e =  {u, v} has its image {φ(u), φ(v)} in a unique block in B. We also denote this induced function from edges to blocks by φ. We say that T represents G if there exists a one-to-one function φ : V → P such that the induced function φ : E → B is also one-to-one; that is, if we can represent vertices of the graph by points of the triple system such that no two edges are represented by the same block. In this paper we examine when a graph can be represented by an STS. First, we find a bound which ensures that every graph of order n is represented in some STS of order f(n). Second, we find a bound which ensures that every graph of order n is represented in every STS of order g(n). Both of these answers are related to finding an independent set in an STS. Our question is a generalization of finding such independent sets. We next examine which graphs can be represented in STS’s of small orders. Finally, we give bounds on the orders of STS’s that are guaranteed to embed all graphs of a given maximum degree.     

Degree sum and connectivity conditions for dominating cycles

For a graph G, let σ_k(G) be the minimum degree sum of an independent set of k vertices. Ore showed that if G is a graph of order n?3 with σ₂(G)?n then G is hamiltonian. Let κ(G) be the connectivity of a graph G. Bauer, Broersma, Li and Veldman proved that if G is a 2-connected graph on n vertices with σ₃(G)?n+κ(G), then G is hamiltonian. On the other hand, Bondy showed that if G is a 2-connected graph on n vertices with σ₃(G)?n+2, then each longest cycle of G is a dominating cycle. In this paper, we prove that if G is a 3-connected graph on n vertices with σ₄(G)?n+κ(G)+3, then G contains a longest cycle which is a dominating cycle.     

On the hole index of L(2,1)-labelings of r-regular graphs

An L(2,1)-labeling of a graph G is an assignment of nonnegative integers to the vertices of G so that adjacent vertices get labels at least distance two apart and vertices at distance two get distinct labels. A hole is an unused integer within the range of integers used by the labeling. The lambda number of a graph G, denoted λ(G), is the minimum span taken over all L(2,1)-labelings of G. The hole index of a graph G, denoted ρ(G), is the minimum number of holes taken over all L(2,1)-labelings with span exactly λ(G). Georges and Mauro [On the structure of graphs with non-surjective L(2,1)-labelings, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 19 (2005) 208-223] conjectured that if G is an r-regular graph and ρ(G)?1, then ρ(G) must divide r. We show that this conjecture does not hold by providing an infinite number of r-regular graphs G such that ρ(G) and r are relatively prime integers.     

Connected graphs with maximal Q-index: The one-dominating-vertex case

By the signless Laplacian of a (simple) graph G we mean the matrix Q(G)=D(G)+A(G), where A(G),D(G) denote respectively the adjacency matrix and the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees of G. For every pair of positive integers n,k, it is proved that if 3?k?n-3, then H_n,k, the graph obtained from the star K_1,n-1 by joining a vertex of degree 1 to k+1 other vertices of degree 1, is the unique connected graph that maximizes the largest signless Laplacian eigenvalue over all connected graphs with n vertices and n+k edges.     

Minimally 3-restricted edge connected graphs

For a connected graph G=(V,E), an edge set S⊂E is a 3-restricted edge cut if G−S is disconnected and every component of G−S has order at least three. The cardinality of a minimum 3-restricted edge cut of G is the 3-restricted edge connectivity of G, denoted by λ₃(G). A graph G is called minimally 3-restricted edge connected if λ₃(G−e)<λ₃(G) for each edge e∈E. A graph G is λ₃-optimal if λ₃(G)=ξ₃(G), where , ω(U) is the number of edges between U and V?U, and G[U] is the subgraph of G induced by vertex set U. We show in this paper that a minimally 3-restricted edge connected graph is always λ₃-optimal except the 3-cube.