Reactions of N-Arylsulfonyl-2-arenesulfonamido-1,4-benzo-quinone 4-Imines with Naphthols

Reactions of N-arylsulfonyl-2-arenesulfonamido-1'4-benzoquinone 4-imines unsubstituted in thering or 6-chloro, 5'6-dichlorosubstituted with 1- or 2-naphthols, 2-methoxynaphthalene provided thecorresponding N-arylsulfonyl-2-arenesulfonamido-6-[2-hydroxy(methoxy)-1-naphthyl]-4-aminophenols fromthe unsubstituted reagent and reduction products from the mono- and dichlorosubstituted quinone imines.     

[(Ph)2(NMe2)C(OLi)⋅THF]2: Crystal Structure of the Tetrahedral Intermediate Formed in the Reaction of N,N-Dimethylbenzamide and Phenyllithium

Information on the reaction path for the 1,2-eliminiation of LiNMe₂ to form benzophenone is provided by the X-ray crystal structure analysis of the tetrahedral adduct [(Ph)₂(NMe₂)C(OLi)⋅THF]₂ (a portion of the structure is shown schematically), which is prepared from N,N-dimethylbenzamide and phenyllithium. A N1−Li1 interaction, which is not observed, would lead to loss of the anomeric effect (n_N→σ^*_C−O) as well as high conformational strain along the C1−N1 bond.     

2,2′‐[2,3‐Di­hydro‐2‐(prop‐2‐enyl)‐1H‐isoindole‐1,3‐diyl­idene]bis(propane­di­nitrile)–tetra­thia­fulvalene (1/1), TCPI–TTF

The title complex, C₁₇H₉N₅·C₆H₄S₄, contains π‐deficient bis(di­nitrile) and TTF mol­ecules stacked alternately in columns along the a‐axis direction; the interplanar angle between the TTF molecule and the isoindolinyl C₄N[C(CN)₂]₂ moiety is 1.21 (4)°. The N‐allyl moiety in the TCPI mol­ecule is oriented at an angle of 87.10 (10)° with respect to the five‐membered C₄N ring, and the four C[triple‐bond]N bond lengths range from 1.134 (3) to 1.142 (3) Å, with C—C[triple‐bond]N angles in the range 174.3 (3)–176.9 (2)°. In the TTF system, the S—C bond lengths are 1.726 (3)–1.740 (3) and 1.751 (2)–1.763 (2) Å for the external S—C(H) and internal S—C(S) bonds, respectively.     

Reactivity of an N,N‐Chelated Germylene Toward Substituted Alkynes,Alkenes, and Allenes

Treatment of N,N‐chelated germylene [(iPr)₂NB(N‐2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃)₂]Ge ( 1 ) with ferrocenyl alkynes containing carbonyl functionalities, FcC≡CC(O)R, resulted in [2+2+2] cyclization and formation of the respective ferrocenylated 3‐Fc‐4‐C(O)R‐1,2‐digermacyclobut‐3‐enes 2 – 4 [R = Me ( 2 ), OEt ( 3 ) and NMe₂ ( 4 )] bearing intact carbonyl substituents. In contrast, the reaction between 1 and PhC(O)C≡CC(O)Ph led to activation of both C≡C and C=O bonds producing bicyclic compound containing two five‐membered 1‐germa‐2‐oxacyclopent‐3‐ene rings sharing one C–C bond, 4,8‐diphenyl‐3,7‐dioxa‐2,6‐digermabicyclo[3.3.0]octa‐4,8‐diene ( 5 ). With N‐methylmaleimide containing an analogous C(O)CH=CHC(O) fragment, germylene 1 reacted under [2+2+2] cyclization involving the C=C double bond, producing 1,2‐digermacyclobutane 6 with unchanged carbonyl moieties. Finally, 1 selectively added to the terminal double bond in allenes CH₂=C=CRR′ giving rise to 3‐(=CRR′)‐1,2‐digermacyclobutanes [R/R′ = Me/Me ( 7 ), H/OMe ( 8 )] bearing an exo‐C=C double bond. All compounds were characterized by ¹H, ¹³C{¹H} NMR, IR and Raman spectroscopy and the molecular structures of 3 , 4 , 5 , and 8 were established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. The redox behavior of ferrocenylated derivatives 2 – 4 was studied by cyclic voltammetry.     

Reaction of <Emphasis Type="Italic">N</Emphasis>-Sulfinyltrifluoromethanesulfonamide CF<Subscript>3</Subscript>SO<Subscript>2</Subscript>N=S=O with Carbonyl Compounds

N-Sulfinyltrifluoromethanesulfonamide CF₃SO₂N=S=O reacts with salicylaldehyde, 2-furaldehyde, 2-thiophenecarbaldehyde, 3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carbaldehyde, and 2-phenyl-2H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carbaldehyde to afford the corresponding N-aryl(hetaryl)methylidenetrifluoromethanesulfonamides in high yields. Reactions of the latter with aniline give no adducts at the C=N bond but transamination products. The reaction of trifluoromethanesulfonamide with phenyl isocyanate led to formation of N,N′-diphenylurea instead of expected N-phenyl-N′-(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)urea.__________Translated from Zhurnal Organicheskoi Khimii, Vol. 41, No. 7, 2005, pp. 1006–1010.Original Russian Text Copyright © 2005 by Shainyan, Tolstikova.     

Reaction ofN-arylsulfonyl-p-quinonimines and semiquinoid compounds derived therefrom with arylsulfinic acids

N-Arylsulfonyl-2,3,5,6-tetrachloro-l,4-benzoquinonimines and 4-arylsulfonylimino-2,3,5,6,6-pentachloro-2-cyclohexen-l-ones react with arylsulfinic acids regioselectively along 6,1-addition. With 4-arylsulfonylimino-2,3,5,6,6-pentachloro-2-cyclohexen-l-ones the 6,1 addition is preceded by nucleophilic substitution of chlorine in position 2. WithN-arylsulfonyl-2,3-dichloro-l,4-naphthoquinonimines, 4-arylsulfonyl-2,2,3-trichloro-l,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-l-ones and 4-arylsulfonyl-2,2,3,3-tetrachloro-1,2,3.4-tetrahydronaphthalen-l-ones occurred nucleophilic substitution of chlorine in position 2 followed by 6,1-addition of arylsulfinic acid molecule.     

Diverse Reactivity of bis(Silylene) and bis(Germylene) [LE−EL (E=Si and Ge: L=PhC(NtBu)2)] in the Oxidative Activation of C−F Bond: Si−Si Bond is Retained While the Ge−Ge Bond Is Cleaved

Herein we report the reactions of 3,4,5,6-tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile ( 1 ) with bis(silylene) and bis(germylene) LE−EL [E=Si ( 2 ) and Ge( 3 ): L=PhC(N^tBu)₂)]. The reaction of LSi−SiL (L=PhC(N^tBu)₂) ( 2 ) with two equivalents of 1 resulted in an unprecedented oxidative addition of a C−F bond of 1 leading to disilicon(III) fluoride {L(4-C₈F₃N)FSi−SiF(4-C₈F₃N)L}( 4 ), wherein the Si−Si single bond was retained. In contrast, the reaction of LGe−GeL (L=PhC(N^tBu)₂) ( 3 ) with one equivalent of 1 resulted in the oxidative cleavage of Ge−Ge bond leading to L(4-C₈F₃N₂)Ge ( 5 ) and LGeF ( 6 ). All three compounds ( 4 – 6 ) were characterized by NMR spectroscopy, EI-MS spectrometry, and elemental analysis. X-ray single-crystal structure determination of compound 4 unequivocally established that the Si^III−Si^III bond remains uncleaved.     

Synthesis and Rearrangement of Stable NHC→Silylene Adducts and Their Unique Reactivity towards Cyclohexylisocyanide

The syntheses and reactivity of the two N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC)→ silylene complexes 2 and 4 have been investigated. The latter are easily accessible by reaction of the zwitterionic, N‐heterocyclic silylene LSi: 1 [L=Ar‐N‐C(=CH₂)CH?C(Me)‐N‐Ar, Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃] with 1,3,4,5‐tetramethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene and 1,3‐diisopropyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene, respectively. While compound 2 undergoes facile rearrangement above ?20 °C to give the unsymmetrical N‐heterocyclic silylcarbene 3 , the derivative 4 remains unchanged even after boiling in benzene. The remarkable reactivity of 3 and 4 towards cyclohexylisocyanide has been examined which leads in a unique series of C? H, Si? H, and C? N bond activations to the new triaminosilanes 5 and 6 , respectively. The novel compounds 3 , 4 , 5 , and 6 were fully characterized by ¹H, ¹³C, and ²⁹Si NMR spectroscopy, EI‐MS, elemental analysis, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

钴、镍多齿吡啶-胺配合物的制备及晶体结构

设计合成了4个新的钴、镍多齿吡啶-胺配合物,[M(L1)](BF₄)₂(L1=N,N,N',N'-四(2-吡啶甲基)-1,2-乙二胺;C1,M=Co;C2,M=Ni)和 [M(L2)](BF₄)_n(L2=N,N,N',N'-四(2-吡啶甲基)-1,3-丙二胺;C3,M=Co,n=3;C4,M=Ni,n=2)。利用红外光谱、元素分析和X-射线单晶衍射方法对这些配合物的组成及结构进行了分析和表征。这4个配合物的单晶结构均属于单斜晶系,空间群有所不同(C1为Cc空间群,C2为P2₁/n空间群,C3为C2/c空间群,C4为P2₁/c空间群),并且4个配合物具有不同的三维堆积结构。     

The 7‐bromo derivative of 2‐amino‐2′‐deoxytubercidin fluorinated at the sugar moiety

The title compound, 2,4‐diamino‐5‐bromo‐7‐(2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoro‐β‐d ‐arabinofuranosyl)‐7H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐d]pyrimidine, C₁₁H₁₃BrFN₅O₃, shows two conformations of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond, with the torsion angle γ (O5′—C5′—C4′—C3′) being 170.1 (3)° for conformer 1 (occupancy 0.69) and 60.7 (7)° for conformer 2 (occupancy 0.31). The N‐glycosylic bond exhibits an anti conformation, with χ = −114.8 (4)°. The sugar pucker is N‐type (C3′‐endo; ³T₄), with P = 23.3 (4)° and τ_m = 36.5 (2)°. The compound forms a three‐dimensional network that is stabilized by several intermolecular hydrogen bonds (N—H...O, O—H...N and N—H...Br).     

Die Hydroaluminierung von 1,1,4,4‐Tetramethyl‐2,3‐diazabutadien mit Dialkylaluminiumhydriden – Synthese von Dialkylaluminiumhydrazoniden

The Hydroalumination of 1,1,4,4‐Tetramethyl‐2,3‐diazabutadiene by Dialkylaluminium Hydrides – Synthesis of Dialkylaluminium Hydrazonides 1,1,4,4‐Tetramethyl‐2,3‐diazabutadiene reacted with dimethylaluminium hydride by hydroalumination of only one C=N double bond. The hydrazone derivative [Me₂Al–N(CHMe₂)–N=CMe₂]₂ ( 1 ) was formed which gave a dimer possessing a six‐membered Al₂N₄ heterocycle. The hydroalumination of both C=N double bonds was not observed. Also an excess of di(tert‐butyl)‐ or bis(trimethylsilylmethyl)aluminium hydride afforded only the product of a single hydroalumination step, a second dialkylaluminium hydride molecule was attached via a coordinative interaction between its central aluminium atom and the nitrogen atom of the C=N double bond and in addition via a 3 c‐2 e Al–H–Al bond. Compounds [(Me₃C)₂Al][(Me₃C)₂AlH]N(CHMe₂)NCMe₂ ( 2 ) and [(Me₃SiCH₂)₂Al][(Me₃SiCH₂)₂AlH]N(CHMe₂)NCMe₂ ( 3 ) were formed which have five‐membered Al₂N₂H heterocycles. Thermolysis of 2 gave by C–H activation compound [(Me₃C)₂Al]₂[CH₂C(Me)=N–]₂ ( 4 ) in trace amounts which possesses two anellated AlN₂C₂ rings with a common N–N bond. In contrast, the thermal decomposition of 3 yielded by the cleavage of the N–N bond a dimeric dialkylaluminium methylideneamide ( 5 ) which has two intact C=N double bonds. Up to now our attempts to insert a C=N double bond into an Al–C bond remained unsuccessful, and only the formation of an adduct [(Me₃C)₃Al(–N=CMe₂)₂] ( 6 ) was observed upon treatment of tri(tert‐butyl)aluminium with the diazabutadiene derivative.     

4‐Amino‐3‐methyl‐6‐phenyl‐1,2,4‐triazin‐5(4H)‐one (metamitron) and 4‐amino‐6‐methyl‐3‐phenyl‐1,2,4‐triazin‐5(4H)‐one (isometamitron)

The title structures, both C₁₀H₁₀N₄O, are substitutional isomers. The N—N bond lengths are longer and the C=N bond lengths are shorter by ca 0.025 Å than the respective average values in the C=N—N=C group of asymmetric triazines; the assessed respective bond orders are 1.3 and 1.7. There are N—H⋯O and N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds in both structures, with 4‐­amino‐3‐methyl‐6‐phenyl‐1,2,4‐triazin‐5(4H)‐one containing a rare bifurcated N—H⋯N,N hydrogen bond. The structures differ in their mol­ecular stacking and the hydrogen‐bonding patterns.     

钴、镍多齿吡啶-胺配合物的制备及晶体结构

设计合成了4个新的钴、镍多齿吡啶-胺配合物,[M(L1)](BF₄)₂(L1=N,N,N',N'-四(2-吡啶甲基)-1,2-乙二胺;C1,M=Co;C2,M=Ni)和[M(L2)](BF₄)_n(L2=N,N,N',N'-四(2-吡啶甲基)-1,3-丙二胺;C3,M=Co,n=3;C4,M=Ni,n=2)。利用红外光谱、元素分析和X-射线单晶衍射方法对这些配合物的组成及结构进行了分析和表征。这4个配合物的单晶结构均属于单斜晶系,空间群有所不同(C1为Cc空间群,C2为P2₁/n空间群,C3为C2/c空间群,C4为P2₁/c空间群),并且4个配合物具有不同的三维堆积结构。     

Theoretical prediction of Ni(I)-catalyst for hydrosilylation of pyridine and quinoline

Catalytic synthesis of dihydropyridine by transition-metal complex is one of the important research targets, recently. Density functional theory calculations here demonstrate that nickel(I) hydride complex (bpy)Ni^IH (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) 1 is a good catalyst for hydrosilylation of both quinoline and pyridine. Two pathways are possible; in path 1, substrate reacts with 1 to form stable intermediate Int1 . After that, N³─C¹ bond of substrate inserts into Ni─H bond of 1 via TS1 to afford N-coordinated 1,2-dihydroquinoline Int2 with the Gibbs activation energy (ΔG°^‡) of 21.8 kcal mol⁻¹. Then, Int2 reacts with hydrosilane to form hydrosilane σ-complex Int3 ; this is named path 1A. In the other route (path 1B), Int1 reacts with phenylsilane in a concerted manner via hydride-shuttle transition state TS2 to afford Int3 . In TS2 , Si atom takes hypervalent trigonal bipyramidal structure. Formation of hypervalent structure is crucial for stabilization of TS2 (ΔG°^‡ = 17.3 kcal mol⁻¹). The final step of path 1 is metathesis between Ni─N³ bond of Int3 and Si─H bond of PhSiH₃ to afford N-silylated 1,2-dihydroproduct and regenerate 1 (ΔG°^‡ = 4.5 kcal mol⁻¹). In path 2, 1 reacts with hydrosilane to form Int5 , which then forms adduct Int6 with substrate through Si–N interaction between substrate and PhSiH₃. Then, N-silylated 1,2-dihydroproduct is produced via hydride-shuttle transition state TS5 (ΔG°^‡ = 18.8 kcal mol⁻¹). The absence of N-coordination of substrate to Ni^I in TS5 is the reason why path 2 is less favorable than path 1B. Quinoline hydrosilylation occurs more easily than pyridine because quinoline has the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital at lower energy than that of pyridine. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Three N2‐benzoyl­oxybenz­amidines: sheet structures built from hard and soft hydrogen bonds and aromatic π–π stacking interactions

Molecules of the title compounds N²‐(benzoyl­oxy)­benz­ami­dine, C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₂, (I), N²‐(2‐hydroxy­benzoyl­oxy)­benz­ami­dine, C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₃, (II), and N²‐benzoyloxy‐2‐hydroxybenzamidine, C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₃, (III), all have extended chain conformations, with the aryl groups remote from one another. In (I), the mol­ecules are linked into chains by a single N—H⋯N hydrogen bond [H⋯N = 2.15 Å, N⋯N = 3.029 (2) Å and N—H⋯N = 153°] and these chains are linked into sheets by means of aromatic π–π stacking interactions. There is one intramolecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bond in (II), and a combination of one three‐centre N—H⋯(N,O) hydrogen bond [H⋯N = 2.46 Å, H⋯O = 2.31 Å, N⋯N = 3.190 (2) Å, N⋯O = 3.146 (2) Å, N—H⋯N = 138° and N—H⋯O = 154°] and one two‐centre C—H⋯O hydrogen bond [H⋯O = 2.46 Å, C⋯O = 3.405 (2) Å and C—H⋯O = 173°] links the mol­ecules into sheets. In (III), an intramolecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bond and two N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds [H⋯O = 2.26 and 2.10 Å, N⋯O = 2.975 (2) and 2.954 (2) Å, and N—H⋯O = 138 and 163°] link the molecules into sheets.     

A structural systematic study of three isomers of difluoro‐N‐(4‐pyridyl)benzamide

The isomers 2,3‐, (I), 2,4‐, (II), and 2,5‐difluoro‐N‐(4‐pyridyl)benzamide, (III), all with formula C₁₂H₈F₂N₂O, all exhibit intramolecular C—H...O=C and N—H...F contacts [both with S(6) motifs]. In (I), intermolecular N—H...O=C interactions form one‐dimensional chains along [010] [N...O = 3.0181 (16) Å], with weaker C—H...N interactions linking the chains into sheets parallel to the [001] plane, further linked into pairs via C—H...F contacts about inversion centres; a three‐dimensional herring‐bone network forms via C—H...π(py) (py is pyridyl) interactions. In (II), weak aromatic C—H...N(py) interactions form one‐dimensional zigzag chains along [001]; no other interactions with H...N/O/F < 2.50 Å are present, apart from long N/C—H...O=C and C—H...F contacts. In (III), N—H...N(py) interactions form one‐dimensional zigzag chains [as C(6) chains] along [010] augmented by a myriad of weak C—H...π(arene) and O=C...O=C interactions and C—H...O/N/F contacts. Compound (III) is isomorphous with the parent N‐(4‐pyridyl)benzamide [Noveron, Lah, Del Sesto, Arif, Miller & Stang (2002). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 , 6613–6625] and the three 2/3/4‐fluoro‐N‐(4‐pyridyl)benzamides [Donnelly, Gallagher & Lough (2008). Acta Cryst. C 64 , o335–o340]. The study expands our series of fluoro(pyridyl)benzamides and augments our understanding of the competition between strong hydrogen‐bond formation and weaker influences on crystal packing.     

Hydrogen‐bonded dimers in 3‐amino‐4‐anilino‐1H‐isochromen‐1‐one and a hydrogen‐bonded sheet in 3‐amino‐4‐[methyl(phenyl)amino]‐1H‐isochromen‐1‐one

The molecules of 3‐amino‐4‐anilino‐1H‐isochromen‐1‐one, C₁₅H₁₂N₂O₂, (I), and 3‐amino‐4‐[methyl(phenyl)amino]‐1H‐isochromen‐1‐one, C₁₆H₁₄N₂O₂, (II), adopt very similar conformations, with the substituted amino group PhNR, where R = H in (I) and R = Me in (II), almost orthogonal to the adjacent heterocyclic ring. The molecules of (I) are linked into cyclic centrosymmetric dimers by pairs of N—H...O hydrogen bonds, while those of (II) are linked into complex sheets by a combination of one three‐centre N—H...(O)₂ hydrogen bond, one two‐centre C—H...O hydrogen bond and two C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds.     

7‐Amino‐1‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐erythro‐pentofuranosyl)‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazolo[4,5‐d]pyrimidine: an 8‐azaadenine nucleoside with the nucleobase in a syn conformation

The title compound, C₉H₁₂N₆O₃, shows a syn‐glycosylic bond orientation [χ = 64.17 (16)°]. The 2′‐deoxyfuranosyl moiety exhibits an unusual C1′‐exo–O4′‐endo (₁T⁰; S‐type) sugar pucker, with P = 111.5 (1)° and τ_m = 40.3 (1)°. The conformation at the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is +sc (gauche), with γ = 64.4 (1)°. The two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network is built from intermolecular N—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds. An intramolecular bifurcated hydrogen bond, with an amino N—H group as hydrogen‐bond donor and the ring and hydroxymethyl O atoms of the sugar moiety as acceptors, constrains the overall conformation of the nucleoside.     

Intra‐ and intermolecular Se...X (X = Se,O) interactions in selenium‐containing heterocycles: 3‐benzoylimino‐5‐(morpholin‐4‐yl)‐1,2,4‐diselenazole

In the selenium‐containing heterocyclic title compound {systematic name: N‐[5‐(morpholin‐4‐yl)‐3H‐1,2,4‐diselenazol‐3‐ylidene]benzamide}, C₁₃H₁₃N₃O₂Se₂, the five‐membered 1,2,4‐diselenazole ring and the amide group form a planar unit, but the phenyl ring plane is twisted by 22.12 (19)° relative to this plane. The five consecutive N—C bond lengths are all of similar lengths [1.316 (6)–1.358 (6) Å], indicating substantial delocalization along these bonds. The Se...O distance of 2.302 (3) Å, combined with a longer than usual amide C=O bond of 2.252 (5) Å, suggest a significant interaction between the amide O atom and its adjacent Se atom. An analysis of related structures containing an Se—Se...X unit (X = Se, S, O) shows a strong correlation between the Se—Se bond length and the strength of the Se...X interaction. When X = O, the strength of the Se...O interaction also correlates with the carbonyl C=O bond length. Weak intermolecular Se...Se, Se...O, C—H...O, C—H...π and π–π interactions each serve to link the molecules into ribbons or chains, with the C—H...O motif being a double helix, while the combination of all interactions generates the overall three‐dimensional supramolecular framework.     

Modification of Yttrium Silyl-Bridged Amide Alkyl Complexes through Si−H/C−H Cross-Dehydrocoupling of Silanes with a Silylamino Ligand: Synthesis,Reactivity, and Mechanism

A new method for the modification of a silylamino ligand has been developed through mono and dual C(sp³)−H/Si−H cross-dehydrocoupling with silanes. The reaction of [LY{η²-(C,N)-CH₂Si(Me₂)NSiMe₃}] (L=bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-β-diketiminato, L′ ( 1^L ′); L=tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)borate, Tp^Me2 ( 1^TpMe2 )) with 2 equivalents of PhSiH₃ in toluene gave the complexes [LY{η²-(C,N)-C(SiH₂Ph)₂Si(Me₂)NSiMe₃}] (L=L′ ( 2^L’ ); L=Tp^Me2 ( 2^TpMe2 )). Moreover, 1^TpMe2 reacted with the secondary silanes Ph₂SiH₂ and Et₂SiH₂ to afford the corresponding mono C−H activation products [Tp^Me2Y{η²-(C,N)-CH(SiHR₂)Si(Me₂)NSiMe₃}] (R=Ph ( 4 b ); R=Et ( 4 c )). The equimolar reaction of 1^TpMe2 with PhSiH₃ also produced the mono C−H activation product 4 a ([Tp^Me2Y{η²-(C,N)-CH(SiH₂Ph)Si(Me₂)NSiMe₃}(thf)]). A study of their reactivity showed that 4 a facilely reacted with 2 equivalents of benzothiazole by an unusual 1,1-addition of the C=N bond of the benzothiazolyl unit to the Si−H bond to give the C−H/Si−H cross-dehydrocoupling product [(Tp^Me2)Y{η³-(N,N,N)-N(SiMe₃)SiMe₂CH₂Si(Ph)(CSC₆H₄N)(CHSC₆H₄N)}] ( 5 ). These results indicate that this modification endows the silylamino ligand with novel reactivity.