Hydrido‐sulfido‐bridged triangular Os3 cluster compounds with different phosphine ligand substitution patterns

In the course of our studies of trinuclear osmium cluster complexes with bridging sulfido and hydrido ligands, the new compounds Os₃(μ‐H)(μ‐SR)(CO)₉(PHCy₂) (Cy = cyclo­hexyl) with R = phenyl, (I) (nona­carbonyl‐1κ³C,2κ³C,3κ³C‐di­cyclo­hexyl­phosphine‐3κP‐μ‐hydrido‐1:2κ²H‐μ‐phenyl­thio‐1:2κ²S‐triangulo‐triosmium), [Os₃H(C₆H₅S)(C₁₂H₂₃P)(CO)₉], and R = naphthyl, (II) [nona­carbonyl‐1κ³C,2κ²C,3κ⁴C‐di­cyclo­hexyl­phosphine‐2κP‐μ‐hydrido‐1:2κ²H‐μ‐(2‐naphthyl­thio)‐1:2κ²S‐triangulo‐triosmium], [Os₃H(C₁₀H₇S)(C₁₂H₂₃P)(CO)₉], were prepared. We report on these two phosphine‐substituted complexes, which exhibit perceptible changes of the Os—Os bond parameters due to the ligand‐substitution pattern.     

Cage Opening of a Carborane Ligand by Metal Cluster Complexes

The reaction of Os₃(CO)₁₀(NCMe)₂ with closo‐o‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀ has yielded two interconvertible isomers Os₃(CO)₉(μ₃‐4,5,9‐C₂B₁₀H₈)(μ‐H)₂ ( 1 a ) and Os₃(CO)₉(μ₃‐3,4,8‐C₂B₁₀H₈)(μ‐H)₂ ( 1 b ) formed by the loss of the two NCMe ligands and one CO ligand from the Os₃ cluster. Two BH bonds of the o‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀ were activated in its addition to the osmium cluster. A second triosmium cluster was added to the 1 a / 1 b mixture to yield the complex Os₃(CO)₉(μ‐H)₂(μ₃‐4,5,9‐μ₃‐7,11,12‐C₂B₁₀H₇)Os₃(CO)₉(μ‐H)₃ ( 2 ) that contains two triosmium triangles attached to the same carborane cage. When heated, 2 was transformed to the complex Os₃(CO)₉(μ‐H)(μ₃‐3,4,8‐μ₃‐7,11,12‐C₂B₁₀H₈)Os₃(CO)₉(μ‐H) ( 3 ) by a novel opening of the carborane cage with loss of H₂.     

Structural diversity of polynuclear MgxOy cores in magnesium phenoxide complexes

The binuclear complex bis(2,6‐di‐tert‐butyl‐4‐methylphenolato)‐1κO ,2κO‐(1,2‐dimethoxyethane‐1κ²O ,O ′)bis(μ‐phenylmethanolato‐1:2κ²O :O )(tetrahydrofuran‐2κO )dimagnesium(II), [Mg₂(C₇H₇O)₂(C₁₅H₂₃O)₂(C₄H₈O)(C₄H₁₀O₂)] or [(BHT)(DME)Mg(μ‐OBn)₂Mg(THF)(BHT)], (I), was obtained from the complex [(BHT)Mg(μ‐OBn)(THF)]₂ by substitution of one tetrahydrofuran (THF) molecule with 1,2‐dimethoxyethane (DME) in toluene (BHT is O‐2,6‐^t Bu₂‐4‐MeC₆H₄ and Bn is benzyl). The trinuclear complex bis(2,6‐di‐tert‐butyl‐4‐methylphenolato)‐1κO ,3κO‐tetrakis(μ‐2‐methylphenolato)‐1:2κ⁴O :O ;2:3κ⁴O :O‐bis(tetrahydrofuran)‐1κO ,3κO‐trimagnesium(II), [Mg₃(C₇H₇O)₄(C₁₅H₂₃O)₂(C₄H₈O)₂] or [(BHT)₂(μ‐O‐2‐MeC₆H₄)₄(THF)₂Mg₃], (II), was formed from a mixture of Bu₂Mg, [(BHT)Mg(ⁿ Bu)(THF)₂] and 2‐methylphenol. An unusual tetranuclear complex, bis(μ₃‐2‐aminoethanolato‐κ⁴O :O :O ,N )tetrakis(μ₂‐2‐aminoethanolato‐κ³O :O ,N )bis(2,6‐di‐tert‐butyl‐4‐methylphenolato‐κO )tetramagnesium(II), [Mg₄(C₂H₆NO)₆(C₁₅H₂₃O)₂] or Mg₄(BHT)₂(OCH₂CH₂NH₂)₆, (III), resulted from the reaction between (BHT)₂Mg(THF)₂ and 2‐aminoethanol. A polymerization test demonstrated the ability of (III) to catalyse the ring‐opening polymerization of ϵ‐caprolactone without activation by alcohol. In all three complexes (I)–(III), the BHT ligand demonstrates the terminal κO‐coordination mode. Complexes (I), (II) and (III) have binuclear rhomboid Mg₂O₂, trinuclear chain‐like Mg₃O₄ and bicubic Mg₄O₆ cores, respectively. A survey of the literature on known polynuclear Mg_x O_y core types for ArO–Mg complexes is also presented.     

Electron‐Rich Diferrous–Phosphane–Thiolates Relevant to Fe‐only Hydrogenase: Is Cyanide “Nature's Trimethylphosphane”?

The two‐step one‐pot oxidative decarbonylation of [Fe₂(S₂C₂H₄)(CO)₄(PMe₃)₂] ( 1 ) with [FeCp₂]PF₆, followed by addition of phosphane ligands, led to a series of diferrous dithiolato carbonyls 2 – 6 , containing three or four phosphane ligands. In situ measurements indicate efficient formation of 1 ²⁺ as the initial intermediate of the oxidation of 1 , even when a deficiency of the oxidant was employed. Subsequent addition of PR₃ gave rise to [Fe₂(S₂C₂H₄)(μ‐CO)(CO)₃(PMe₃)₃]²⁺ ( 2 ) and [Fe₂(S₂C₂H₄)(μ‐CO)(CO)₂(PMe₃)₂(PR₃)₂]²⁺ (R=Me 3 , OMe 4 ) as principal products. One terminal CO ligand in these complexes was readily substituted by MeCN, and [Fe₂(S₂C₂H₄)(μ‐CO)(CO)₂(PMe₃)₃(MeCN)]²⁺ ( 5 ) and [Fe₂(S₂C₂H₄)(μ‐CO)(CO)(PMe₃)₄(MeCN)]²⁺ ( 6 ) were fully characterized. Relevant to the H_red state of the active site of Fe‐only hydrogenases, the unsymmetrical derivatives 5 and 6 feature a semibridging CO ligand trans to a labile coordination site.     

Intramolecular Cyclization of Butadiyne Functionalized Ligands coordinated to Triosmium‐Carbonyl Cluster

Reactions between diynes and [Os₃(CO)₁₁(CH₃CN)] in the presence of water give rise to the formation of intriguing hydride triosmium clusters [Os₃(μ‐H)(CO)₉{μ₃,η¹:η³:η¹‐RC₂COHC≡CR}] ( 1a – 1c ) under mild conditions in high yields. When these allylic alcohol compounds 1a – 1c are dissolved in dry polar and donor solvents, an intramolecular cyclization process takes place to give [Os₃(μ‐H)(CO)₉{μ₃,η¹:η³:η¹‐RC₂CH=COCR}] ( 2a – 2c ) in quantitative yield. The utilization of [Os₃(CO)₁₁(CH₃CN)] as starting material together with the addition of water can replace the inconvenient use of [Os₃(μ‐H)₂(CO)₁₀]. This method of synthesis provides a facile pathway for diyne cyclizations and has a clear advantage over those described to date in the literature. Additionally, the analogous cyclized mixed‐metal complex [Os₃(μ‐H)(CO)₉{μ₃,η¹:η³:η¹‐FcC₂CH=COCFc}] ( 2d ) (Fc = ferrocenyl), was synthesized in order to carry out a comparative electrochemical study with the related compounds [Os₃(CO)₁₁(μ₃‐FcC₄Fc)] ( I ) and [Os₃(CO)₁₀(μ₃‐FcC₄Fc)] ( II ), which were previously reported by R. D. Adams.     

Chromium complexes bearing disubstituted organophosphate ligands and their use in ethylene polymerization

The crystal structures of three unusual chromium organophosphate complexes have been determined, namely, bis(μ‐butyl 2,6‐di‐tert‐butyl‐4‐methylphenyl hydrogen phosphato‐κO:κO′)di‐μ‐hydroxido‐bis[(butyl 2,6‐di‐tert‐butyl‐4‐methylphenyl hydrogen phosphato‐κO)(butyl 2,6‐di‐tert‐butyl‐4‐methylphenyl phosphato‐κO)chromium](Cr—Cr) heptane disolvate or {Cr₂(μ₂‐OH)₂[μ₂‐PO₂(OBu)(O‐2,6‐^tBu₂‐4‐MeC₆H₂)‐κO:κO′]₂[PO₂(OBu)(O‐2,6‐^tBu₂‐4‐MeC₆H₂)‐κO]₂[HOPO(OBu)(O‐2,6‐^tBu₂‐4‐MeC₆H₂)‐κO]₂}·2C₇H₁₆, [Cr₂(C₁₉H₃₂O₄P)₄(C₁₉H₃₃O₄P)₂(OH)₂]·2C₇H₁₆, denoted ( 1 )·2(heptane), [μ‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) phosphato‐1κO:2κO′]bis[bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) phosphato]‐1κO,2κO‐chlorido‐2κCl‐triethanol‐1κ²O,2κO‐di‐μ‐ethanolato‐1κ²O:2κ²O‐dichromium(Cr—Cr) ethanol monosolvate or {Cr₂(μ₂‐OEt)₂[μ₂‐PO₂(O‐2,6‐ⁱPr₂‐C₆H₃)₂‐κO:κO′][PO₂(O‐2,6‐ⁱPr₂‐C₆H₃)₂‐κO]₂Cl(EtOH)₃}·EtOH, [Cr₂(C₂H₅O)₂(C₂₄H₃₄O₄P)₃Cl(C₂H₆O)₃]·C₂H₆O, denoted ( 2 )·EtOH, and di‐μ‐ethanolato‐1κ²O:2κ²O‐bis{[bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) hydrogen phosphato‐κO][bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) phosphato‐κO]chlorido(ethanol‐κO)chromium}(Cr—Cr) benzene disolvate or {Cr₂(μ₂‐OEt)₂[PO₂(O‐2,6‐ⁱPr₂‐C₆H₃)₂‐κO]₂[HOPO(O‐2,6‐ⁱPr₂‐C₆H₃)₂‐κO]₂Cl₂(EtOH)₂}·2C₆H₆, [Cr₂(C₂H₅O)₂(C₂₄H₃₄O₄P)₂(C₂₄H₃₅O₄P)₂Cl₂(C₂H₆O)₂]·2C₆H₆, denoted ( 3 )·2C₆H₆. Complexes ( 1 )–( 3 ) have been synthesized by an exchange reaction between the in‐situ‐generated corresponding lithium or potassium disubstituted phosphates with CrCl₃(H₂O)₆ in ethanol. The subsequent crystallization of ( 1 ) from heptane, ( 2 ) from ethanol and ( 3 ) from an ethanol/benzene mixture allowed us to obtain crystals of ( 1 )·2(heptane), ( 2 )·EtOH and ( 3 )·2C₆H₆, whose structures have the monoclinic P2₁, orthorhombic P2₁2₁2₁ and triclinic P space groups, respectively. All three complexes have binuclear cores with a single Cr—Cr bond, i.e. Cr₂O₆P₂ in ( 1 ), Cr₂PO₄ in ( 2 ) and Cr₂O₂ in ( 3 ), where the Cr atoms are in distorted octahedral environments, formally having 16 ē per Cr atom. The complexes have bridging ligands μ₂‐OH in ( 1 ) or μ₂‐OEt in ( 2 ) and ( 3 ). The organophosphate ligands demonstrate terminal κO coordination modes in ( 1 )–( 3 ) and bridging μ₂‐κO:κO′ coordination modes in ( 1 ) and ( 2 ). All the complexes exhibit hydrogen bonding: two intramolecular O_phos…H—O_phos interactions in ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) form two {H[PO₂(OR)₂]₂} associates; two intramolecular Cl…H—O_Et hydrogen bonds additionally stabilize the Cr₂O₂ core in ( 3 ); two intramolecular O_phos…H—O_Et interactions and two O…H—O intermolecular hydrogen bonds with a noncoordinating ethanol molecule are observed in ( 2 )·EtOH. The presence of both basic ligands (OH^? or OEt^?) and acidic [H(phosphate)₂]^? associates at the same metal centres in ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) is rather unusual. Complexes may serve as precatalysts for ethylene polymerization under mild conditions, providing polyethylene with a small amount of short‐chain branching. The formation of a small amount of α‐olefins has been detected in this reaction.     

Mapping the Transformation [{RuII(CO)3Cl2}2]→[RuI2(CO)4]2+: Implications in Binuclear Water–Gas Shift Chemistry

The complete sequence of reactions in the base‐promoted reduction of [{Ru^II(CO)₃Cl₂}₂] to [Ru^I₂(CO)₄]²⁺ has been unraveled. Several μ‐OH, μ:κ²‐CO₂H‐bridged diruthenium(II) complexes have been synthesized; they are the direct results of the nucleophilic activation of metal‐coordinated carbonyls by hydroxides. The isolated compounds are [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)₂(μ‐OH)(NP^F‐Am)₂][PF₆] ( 1 ; NP^F‐Am=2‐amino‐5,7‐trifluoromethyl‐1,8‐naphthyridine) and [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)(μ‐OH)(NP‐Me₂)₂][BF₄]₂ ( 2 ), secured by the applications of naphthyridine derivatives. In the absence of any capping ligand, a tetranuclear complex [Ru₄(CO)₈(H₂O)₂(μ³‐OH)₂(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)₄][CF₃SO₃]₂ ( 3 ) is isolated. The bridging hydroxido ligand in 1 is readily replaced by a π‐donor chlorido ligand, which results in [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)₂(μ‐Cl)(NP‐PhOMe)₂][BF₄] ( 4 ). The production of [Ru₂(CO)₄]²⁺ has been attributed to the thermally induced decarboxylation of a bis(hydroxycarbonyl)–diruthenium(II) complex to a dihydrido–diruthenium(II) species, followed by dinuclear reductive elimination of molecular hydrogen with the concomitant formation of the Ru^I? Ru^I single bond. This work was originally instituted to find a reliable synthetic protocol for the [Ru₂(CO)₄(CH₃CN)₆]²⁺ precursor. It is herein prescribed that at least four equivalents of base, complete removal of chlorido ligands by Tl^I salts, and heating at reflux in acetonitrile for a period of four hours are the conditions for the optimal conversion. Premature quenching of the reaction resulted in the isolation of a trinuclear Ru^I₂Ru^II complex [{Ru(NP‐Am)₂(CO)}{Ru₂(NP‐Am)₂(CO)₂(μ‐CO)₂}(μ₃:κ³‐C,O,O′‐CO₂)][BF₄]₂ ( 6 ). These unprecedented diruthenium compounds are the dinuclear congeners of the water–gas shift (WGS) intermediates. The possibility of a dinuclear pathway eliminates the inherent contradiction of pH demands in the WGS catalytic cycle in an alkaline medium. A cooperative binuclear elimination could be a viable route for hydrogen production in WGS chemistry.     

Two dimeric CuII benzoate derivatives solvated with aceto­nitrile

The title compounds, tetrakis(μ‐benzoato‐O:O′)­bis(2,6‐di­amino­pyridine)‐1κN,2κN‐dicopper(II)–aceto­nitrile (1/2), [Cu₂(C₇H₅O₂)₄(C₅H₇N₃)₂]·2C₂H₃N, (I), and bis­(aceto­nitrile)‐1κN,2κN‐tetrakis(μ‐benzoato‐O:O′)­dicopper(II)–aceto­nitrile (1/1.5), [Cu₂(C₇H₅O₂)₄(C₂H₃N)₂]·1.5C₂H₃N, (II), crystallize as aceto­nitrile solvates exhibiting different stability. They have similar molecular structures with discrete dimeric units located at crystallographic inversion centres. The copper ions are bridged by four benzoate groups and neutral N‐donor ligands, viz. 2,6‐di­amino­pyridine in (I) and aceto­nitrile in (II), are coordinated at apical positions. The diverse stability is probably due to hydrogen‐bond interactions of the solvated aceto­nitrile mol­ecules with neighbouring dimers in compound (I).     

Dimeric copper(II) 3,3‐dimethyl­butyrate adducts with ethanol, 2‐methylpyridine, 3‐methylpyridine, 4‐methylpyridine and 3,3‐dimethylbutyric acid

In the crystals of the five title compounds, tetrakis‐(μ‐3,3‐dimethylbutyrato‐O:O′)bis(ethanol‐O)dicopper(II)–ethanol (1/2), [Cu₂(C₆H₁₁O₂)₄(C₂H₆O)₂]·2C₂H₆O, (I), tetrakis(μ‐3,3‐dimethylbutyrato‐O:O′)bis(2‐methylpyridine‐N)di­copper(II), [Cu₂(C₆H₁₁O₂)₄(C₆H₇N)₂], (II), tetrakis‐(μ‐3,3‐dimethylbutyrato‐O:O′)bis(3‐methylpyridine‐N)di‐copper(II), [Cu₂(C₆H₁₁O₂)₄(C₆H₇N)₂], (III), tetrakis‐(μ‐3,3‐dimethylbutyrato‐O:O′)bis(4‐methylpyridine‐N)di‐copper(II), [Cu₂(C₆H₁₁O₂)₄(C₆H₇N)₂], (IV), and tetrakis‐(μ‐3,3‐dimethylbutyrato‐O:O′)bis(3,3‐dimethylbutyric acid‐O)dicopper(II), [Cu₂(C₆H₁₁O₂)₄(C₆H₁₂O₂)₂], (V), the di­nuclear Cu^II complexes all have centrosymmetric cage structures and (IV) has two independent molecules. The Cu?Cu separations are: (I) 2.602 (3) Å, (II) 2.666 (3) Å, (III) 2.640 (2) Å, (IV) 2.638 (4) Å and (V) 2.599 (1) Å.     

Three zinc iodide complexes based on phosphane ligands: syntheses,structures, optical properties and TD–DFT calculations

Three zinc iodide complexes based on phosphane ligands, namely diiodidobis(triphenylphosphane‐κP)zinc(II), [ZnI₂(C₁₈H₁₅P₂)₂], ( 1 ), diiodidobis[tris(4‐methylphenyl)phosphane‐κP]zinc(II), [ZnI₂(C₂₁H₂₁P₂)₂], ( 2 ), and [bis(diphenylphosphoryl)methane‐κ²O,O′]zinc(II) tetraiodidozinc(II), [Zn(C₂₅H₂₂O₂P₂)₃][ZnI₄], ( 3 ), have been synthesized and characterized. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction revealed that the structures of ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) are both mononuclear four‐coordinated ZnI₂ complexes containing two monodentate phosphane ligands, respectively. Surprisingly, ( 2 ) spontaneously forms an acentric structure, suggesting it might be a potential second‐order NLO material. The crystal structure of complex ( 3 ) is composed of two parts, namely a [Zn(dppmO₂)₃]²⁺ cation [dppmO₂ is bis(diphenylphosphoryl)methane] and a [ZnI₄]²⁻ anion. The UV–Vis absorption spectra, thermal stabilities and photoluminescence spectra of the title complexes have also been studied. Time‐dependent density functional theory (TD–DFT) calculations reveal that the low‐energy UV absorption and the corresponding light emission both result from halide‐ligand charge‐transfer (XLCT) excited states.     

First heterobimetallic AgI–CoIII coordination compound with both bridging and terminal –NO2 coordination modes: synthesis,characterization, structural and computational studies of (PPh3)2AgI–(μ‐κ2O,O′:κN‐NO2)–CoIII(DMGH)2(κN‐NO2)

An unusual heterobimetallic bis(triphenylphosphane)(NO₂)Ag^I–Co^III(dimethylglyoximate)(NO₂) coordination compound with both bridging and terminal –NO₂ (nitro) coordination modes has been isolated and characterized from the reaction of [CoCl(DMGH)₂(PPh₃)] (DMGH₂ is dimethylglyoxime or N,N′‐dihydroxybutane‐2,3‐diimine) with excess AgNO₂. In the title compound, namely bis(dimethylglyoximato‐1κ²O,O′)(μ‐nitro‐1κN:2κ²O,O′)(nitro‐1κN)bis(triphenylphosphane‐2κP)cobalt(III)silver(I), [AgCo(C₄H₇N₂O₂)₂(NO₂)₂(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂], one of the ambidentate –NO₂ ligands, in a bridging mode, chelates the Ag^I atom in an isobidentate κ²O,O′‐manner and its N atom is coordinated to the Co^III atom. The other –NO₂ ligand is terminally κN‐coordinated to the Co^III atom. The structure has been fully characterized by X‐ray crystallography and spectroscopic methods. Density functional theory (DFT) and time‐dependent density functional theory (TD‐DFT) have been used to study the ground‐state electronic structure and elucidate the origin of the electronic transitions, respectively.     

A dinuclear phosphite rhodium(I) complex obtained by syngas treatment of a Rh/hydroxy phosphonite olefin hydroformylation precatalyst

A hydroxy phosphonite was found to be unstable during the catalyst preformation routine applied towards a rhodium olefin hydroformylation catalyst. C—P bond cleavage occurred when the phosphonite was reacted with [(acac)Rh(1,5‐COD)] (acac is acetyl acetate and 1,5‐COD is cycloocta‐1,5‐diene) at 80 °C and 20 bar of CO/H₂. As a result, a nearly planar six‐membered ring structure consisting of two rhodium(I) cations and two bridging phosphorous acid diester anions was formed, namely bis[μ‐(4,8‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2,10‐dimethoxydibenzo[d,f][1,3,2]dioxaphosphepin‐6‐yl)oxy]‐1:2κ²P:O;1:2κ²O:P‐bis{[6‐([1,1′‐biphenyl]‐2‐yloxy)‐4,8‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2,10‐dimethoxydibenzo[d,f][1,3,2]dioxaphosphepine‐κP]carbonylrhodium(I)} toluene tetrasolvate, [Rh₂(C₂₂H₂₈O₅P)₂(C₃₄H₃₇O₅P)₂(CO)₂]·4C₇H₈. Further coordination of phosphite and of carbonyl groups resulted in 16‐electron rhodium centres.     

Stereoselectivity in Diphos Addition to Molybdenum Complex with Pyridine‐2‐thionate (pyS) and η3‐Methallyl Coordinated Ligands

The conformational isomers endo‐ and exo‐[Mo{η³‐C₃H₄(CH₃)}(η²‐pyS)(CO)(η²‐diphos)] (diphos: dppm = {bis(diphenylphosphino)methane}, 2 ; dppe = {1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane}, 3 ) are prepared by reacting the double‐bridged pyridine‐2‐thionate (pyS) complex [Mo{η³‐C₃H₄(CH₃)}(CO)₂]₂(η¹:η²:μ‐pyS)₂, 1 with diphos in refluxing acetonitrile. Stereoselectivity of the methallyl, C₃H₄(CH₃), ligand improves the formation of the exo‐conformation of 2 and 3 . Orientations and spectroscopy of these complexes are discussed.     

Binuclear Aromatic C−H Bond Activation at a Dirhenium Site

The electronically unsaturated dirhenium complex [Re₂(CO)₈(μ‐H)(μ‐Ph)] ( 1 ) has been found to exhibit aromatic C?H activation upon reaction with N,N‐diethylaniline, naphthalene, and even [D₆]benzene to yield the compounds [Re₂(CO)₈(μ‐H)(μ‐η¹‐NEt₂C₆H₄)] ( 2 ), [Re₂(CO)₈(μ‐H)(μ‐η²‐1,2‐C₁₀H₇)] ( 3 ), and [D₆]‐ 1 , respectively, in good yields. The mechanism has been elucidated by using DFT computational analyses, and involves a binuclear C?H bond‐activation process.     

Dimeric copper(II) trimethylsilyl­acetate adducts with pyridine, 2‐­methylpyridine, 3‐methylpyridine and quinoline,and a polymeric copper(II) trimethylsilylacetate

In the crystals of bis(pyridine‐N)tetrakis(μ‐trimethylsilylacetato‐O:O′)dicopper(II), [Cu₂(C₅H₁₁O₂Si)₄(C₅H₅N)₂], (I), the dinuclear Cu^II complexes have cage structures with Cu?Cu distances of 2.632 (1) and 2.635 (1) Å. In the crystals of bis(2‐­methylpyridine‐N)tetrakis(μ‐trimethylsilylacetato‐O:O′)dicopper(II), [Cu₂(C₅H₁₁O₂Si)₄(C₆H₇N)₂], (II), bis­(3‐methylpyridine‐N)tetrakis(μ‐trimethylsilylacetato‐O:O′)dicopper(II), [Cu₂(C₅H₁₁O₂Si)₄(C₆H₇N)₂], (III), and bis(quinoline‐N)­tetrakis(μ‐­trimethylsilylacetato‐O:O′)dicopper(II), [Cu₂(C₅H₁₁O₂Si)₄(C₉H₇N)₂], (IV), the centrosymmetric dinuclear Cu^II complexes have a cage structure with Cu?Cu distances of 2.664 (1), 2.638 (3) and 2.665 (1) Å, respectively. In the crystals of catena‐poly­[tetrakis(μ‐trimethylsilylacetato‐O:O′)dicopper(II)], [Cu₂(C₅H₁₁O₂Si)₄]_n, (V), the dinuclear Cu^II units of a cage structure are linked by the cyclic Cu—O bonds at the apical positions to form a linear chain by use of a glide translation.     

Synthesis of ReI tricarbonyl complexes with various sulfur‐ and oxygen‐donating ligands: crystal structures of two ReI dinuclear structures bridged by S atoms

The synthesis and characterization of two dinuclear complexes, namely fac‐hexacarbonyl‐1κ³C,2κ³C‐(pyridine‐1κN)[μ‐2,2′‐sulfanediyldi(ethanethiolato)‐1κ²S¹,S³:2κ³S¹,S²,S³]dirhenium(I), [Re₂(C₄H₈S₃)(C₅H₅N)(CO)₆], ( 1 ), and tetraethylammonium fac‐tris(μ‐2‐methoxybenzenethiolato‐κ²S:S)bis[tricarbonylrhenium(I)], (C₈H₂₀N)[Re₂(C₇H₇OS)₃(CO)₆], ( 2 ), together with two mononuclear complexes, namely (2,2′‐bithiophene‐5‐carboxylic acid‐κ²S,S′)bromidotricarbonylrhenium(I), ( 3 ), and bromidotricarbonyl(methyl benzo[b]thiophene‐2‐carboxylate‐κ²O,S)rhenium(I), ( 4 ), are reported. Crystals of ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) were characterized by X‐ray diffraction. The crystal structure of ( 1 ) revealed two Re—S—Re bridges. The thioether S atom only bonds to one of the Re^I metal centres, while the geometry of the second Re^I metal centre is completed by a pyridine ligand. The structure of ( 2 ) is characterized by three S‐atom bridges and an Re…Re nonbonding distance of 3.4879 (5) Å, which is shorter than the distance found for ( 1 ) [3.7996 (6)/3.7963 (6) Å], but still clearly a nonbonding distance. Complex ( 1 ) is stabilized by six intermolecular hydrogen‐bond interactions and an O…O interaction, while ( 2 ) is stabilized by two intermolecular hydrogen‐bond interactions and two O…π interactions.     

The conformations of two copper(I) complexes of 1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione and thiosaccharinate

(Acetonitrile‐1κN)[μ‐1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione‐1:2κ²S:S][1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione‐2κS]bis(μ‐1,1‐dioxo‐1λ⁶,2‐benzothiazole‐3‐thiolato)‐1:2κ²S³:N;1:2κ²S³:S³‐dicopper(I)(Cu—Cu), [Cu₂(C₇H₄NO₂S₂)₂(C₇H₆N₂S)₂(CH₃CN)] or [Cu₂(tsac)₂(Sbim)₂(CH₃CN)] [tsac is thiosaccharinate and Sbim is 1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione], (I), is a new copper(I) compound that consists of a triply bridged dinuclear Cu—Cu unit. In the complex molecule, two tsac anions and one neutral Sbim ligand bind the metals. One anion bridges via the endocyclic N and exocyclic S atoms (μ‐S:N). The other anion and one of the mercaptobenzimidazole molecules bridge the metals through their exocyclic S atoms (μ‐S:S). The second Sbim ligand coordinates in a monodentate fashion (κS) to one Cu atom, while an acetonitrile molecule coordinates to the other Cu atom. The Cu^I—Cu^I distance [2.6286 (6) Å] can be considered a strong `cuprophilic' interaction. In the case of [μ‐1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione‐1:2κ²S:S]bis[1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione]‐1κS;2κS‐bis(μ‐1,1‐dioxo‐1λ⁶,2‐benzothiazole‐3‐thiolato)‐1:2κ²S³:N;1:2κ²S³:S³‐dicopper(I)(Cu—Cu), [Cu₂(C₇H₄NO₂S₂)₂(C₇H₆N₂S)₃] or [Cu₂(tsac)₂(Sbim)₃], (II), the acetonitrile molecule is substituted by an additional Sbim ligand, which binds one Cu atom via the exocylic S atom. In this case, the Cu^I—Cu^I distance is 2.6068 (11) Å.     

A photochromic dinuclear compound: aquatetrakis(μ‐2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato)bis(2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato)ethanolbis(1,10‐phenanthroline)dilanthanum(III)

The title dinuclear complex, (aqua‐1κO)tetrakis(μ‐2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato‐1:2κ²O:O′)bis(2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato)‐1κO;2κO‐(ethanol‐2κO)bis(1,10‐phenanthroline)‐1κ²N,N′;2κ²N,N′‐dilanthanum(III), [La₂(C₁₅H₁₁O₂)₆(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂(C₂H₅OH)(H₂O)], contains two similar La^III centres with distorted [LaO₆N₂] bicapped triganol–prismatic coordination polyhedra formed by six phenylcinnamate (PCA⁻ or 2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoate) ligands, two 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen) ligands, a coordinating ethanol molecule and a coordinating water molecule. The two metal centres are bridged by four μ‐PCA⁻ ligands, with the remaining two PCA⁻ ligands coordinated in a monodentate fashion. The noncoordinated carboxylate O atoms on the terminal PCA⁻ ligands form O—H...O hydrogen bonds with the coordinated solvent molecules. Each La centre is also coordinated by a bidentate phen ligand. The PCA⁻ ligands all adopt syn–syn orientations, with the two phenyl rings presenting dihedral angles of about 70°. The compound displays photochromic behaviour both in solution and in the solid state.     

Designing a heterotrinuclear CuII—NiII—CuII complex from a mononuclear CuII Schiff base precursor with dicyanamide as a coligand: synthesis,crystal structure,thermal and photoluminescence properties

Schiff bases are considered `versatile ligands' in coordination chemistry. The design of polynuclear complexes has become of interest due to their facile preparations and varied synthetic, structural and magnetic properties. The reaction of the `ligand complex' [CuL] {H₂L is 2,2′‐[propane‐1,3‐diylbis(nitrilomethanylylidene)]diphenol} with Ni(OAc)₂·4H₂O (OAc is acetate) in the presence of dicyanamide (dca) leads to the formation of bis(dicyanamido‐1κN¹)bis(dimethyl sulfoxide)‐2κO,3κO‐bis{μ‐2,2′‐[propane‐1,3‐diylbis(nitrilomethanylylidene)]diphenolato}‐1:2κ⁶O,O′:O,N,N′,O′;1:3κ⁶O,O′:O,N,N′,O′‐dicopper(II)nickel(II), [Cu₂Ni(C₁₇H₁₆N₂O₂)₂(C₂N₃)₂(C₂H₆OS)₂]. The complex shows strong absorption bands in the frequency region 2155–2269 cm⁻¹, which clearly proves the presence of terminal bonding dca groups. A single‐crystal X‐ray study revealed that two [CuL] units coordinate to an Ni^II atom through the phenolate O atoms, with double phenolate bridges between Cu^II and Ni^II atoms. Two terminal dca groups complete the distorted octahedral geometry around the central Ni^II atom. According to differential thermal analysis–thermogravimetric analysis (DTA–TGA), the title complex is stable up to 423 K and thermal decomposition starts with the release of two coordinated dimethyl sulfoxide molecules. Free H₂L exhibits photoluminescence properties originating from intraligand (π–π*) transitions and fluorescence quenching is observed on complexation of H₂L with Cu^II.     

Synthesis and Reactivity of Cationic Triruthenium Clusters Derived from 2‐Methyl‐ and 4‐Methylpyrimidines: From Conventional Cyclometalated Ligands to Novel Types of N‐Heterocyclic Carbenes

The methylation of the uncoordinated nitrogen atom of the cyclometalated triruthenium cluster complexes [Ru₃(μ‐H)(μ‐κ²N¹,C⁶‐2‐Mepyr)(CO)₁₀] ( 1 ; 2‐MepyrH=2‐methylpyrimidine) and [Ru₃(μ‐H)(μ‐κ²N¹,C⁶‐4‐Mepyr)(CO)₁₀] ( 9 ; 4‐MepyrH=4‐methylpyrimidine) gives two similar cationic complexes, [Ru₃(μ‐H)(μ‐κ²N¹,C⁶‐2,3‐Me₂pyr)(CO)₁₀]⁺( 2 ⁺) and [Ru₃(μ‐H)(μ‐κ²N¹,C⁶‐3,4‐Me₂pyr)(CO)₁₀]⁺ ( 9 ⁺), respectively, whose heterocyclic ligands belong to a novel type of N‐heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) that have the C_carbene atom in 6‐position of a pyrimidine framework. The position of the C‐methyl group in the ligands of complexes 2 ⁺ (on C²) and 9 ⁺ (on C⁴) is of key importance for the outcome of their reactions with K[N(SiMe₃)₂], K‐selectride, and cobaltocene. Although these reagents react with 2 ⁺ to give [Ru₃(μ‐H)(μ‐κ²N¹,C⁶‐2‐CH₂‐3‐Mepyr)(CO)₁₀] ( 3 ; deprotonation of the C²‐Me group), [Ru₃(μ‐H)(μ₃‐κ³N¹,C⁵,C⁶‐4‐H‐2,3‐Me₂pyr)(CO)₉] ( 4 ; hydride addition at C⁴), and [Ru₆(μ‐H)₂{μ₆‐κ⁶N¹,N^1′,C⁵,C^5′,C⁶,C^6′‐4,4′‐bis(2,3‐Me₂pyr)}(CO)₁₈] ( 5 ; reductive dimerization at C⁴), respectively, similar reactions with 9 ⁺ have only allowed the isolation of [Ru₃(μ‐H)(μ₃‐κ²N¹,C⁶‐2‐H‐3,4‐Me₂pyr)(CO)₉] ( 11 ; hydride addition at C²). Compounds 3 and 11 also contain novel six‐membered ring NHC ligands. Theoretical studies have established that the deprotonation of 2 ⁺ and 9 ⁺ (that have ligand‐based LUMOs) are charge‐controlled processes and that both the composition of the LUMOs of these cationic complexes and the steric protection of their ligand ring atoms govern the regioselectivity of their nucleophilic addition and reduction reactions.