Pressure‐Tuneable Visible‐Range Band Gap in the Ionic Spinel Tin Nitride

The application of pressure allows systematic tuning of the charge density of a material cleanly, that is, without changes to the chemical composition via dopants, and exploratory high‐pressure experiments can inform the design of bulk syntheses of materials that benefit from their properties under compression. The electronic and structural response of semiconducting tin nitride Sn₃N₄ under compression is now reported. A continuous opening of the optical band gap was observed from 1.3 eV to 3.0 eV over a range of 100 GPa, a 540 nm blue‐shift spanning the entire visible spectrum. The pressure‐mediated band gap opening is general to this material across numerous high‐density polymorphs, implicating the predominant ionic bonding in the material as the cause. The rate of decompression to ambient conditions permits access to recoverable metastable states with varying band gaps energies, opening the possibility of pressure‐tuneable electronic properties for future applications.     

Structural and computational analysis of intermolecular interactions in a new 2‐thiouracil polymorph

The crystallization and characterization of a new polymorph of 2‐thiouracil by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, Hirshfeld surface analysis and periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculations are described. The previously published polymorph (A ) crystallizes in the triclinic space group P , while that described herein (B ) crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P 2₁/c . Periodic DFT calculations showed that the energies of polymorphs A and B , compared to the gas‐phase geometry, were −108.8 and −29.4 kJ mol⁻¹, respectively. The two polymorphs have different intermolecular contacts that were analyzed and are discussed in detail. Significant differences in the molecular structure were found only in the bond lengths and angles involving heteroatoms that are involved in hydrogen bonds. Decomposition of the Hirshfeld fingerprint plots revealed that O…H and S…H contacts cover over 50% of the noncovalent contacts in both of the polymorphs; however, they are quite different in strength. Hydrogen bonds of the N—H…O and N—H…S types were found in polymorph A , whereas in polymorph B , only those of the N—H…O type are present, resulting in a different packing in the unit cell. QTAIM (quantum theory of atoms in molecules) computational analysis showed that the interaction energies for these weak‐to‐medium strength hydrogen bonds with a noncovalent or mixed interaction character were estimated to fall within the ranges 5.4–10.2 and 4.9–9.2 kJ mol⁻¹ for polymorphs A and B , respectively. Also, the NCI (noncovalent interaction) plots revealed weak stacking interactions. The interaction energies for these interactions were in the ranges 3.5–4.1 and 3.1–5.5 kJ mol⁻¹ for polymorphs A and B , respectively, as shown by QTAIM analysis.     

Two tautomeric polymorphs of 2,6‐dichloropurine

Two polymorphs of 2,6‐dichloropurine, C₅H₂Cl₂N₄, have been crystallized and identified as the 9H‐ and 7H‐tautomers. Despite differences in the space group and number of symmetry‐independent molecules, they exhibit similar hydrogen‐bonding motifs. Both crystal structures are stabilized by intermolecular N—H...N interactions that link adjacent molecules into linear chains, and by some nonbonding contacts of the C—Cl...π type and by π–π stacking interactions, giving rise to a crossed two‐dimensional herringbone packing motif. The main structural difference between the two polymorphs is the different role of the molecules in the π–π stacking interactions.     

Two polymorphs of 20‐desmethyl‐β‐carotene

Two polymorphs of 20‐desmethyl‐β‐carotene (systematic name: 20‐nor‐β,β‐carotene), C₃₉H₅₄, in monoclinic and triclinic space groups, were formed in the same vial by recrystallization from pyridine and water. Each polymorph crystallizes with the complete molecule as the asymmetric unit, and the two polymorphs show differing patterns of disorder. The β end rings of both polymorphs have the 6‐s‐cis conformation, and are twisted out of the plane of the polyene chain by angles of −53.2 (8) and 47.3 (8)° for the monoclinic polymorph, and −43.6 (3) and 56.1 (3)° for the triclinic polymorph. The cyclohexene end groups are in the half‐chair conformation, but the triclinic polymorph shows disorder of one ring. Overlay of the molecules shows that they differ in the degree of nonplanarity of the polyene chains and the angles of twist of the end rings. The packing arrangements of the two polymorphs are quite different, with the monoclinic polymorph showing short intermolecular contacts of the disordered methyl groups with adjacent polyene chain atoms, and the triclinic polymorph showing π–π stacking interactions of the almost parallel polyene chains. The determination of the crystal structures of the two title polymorphs of 20‐desmethyl‐β‐carotene allows information to be gained regarding the structural effects on the polyene chain, as well as on the end groups, versus that of the parent compound β‐carotene. The absence of the methyl group is known to have an impact on various functions of the title compound.     

Conformational dimorphism in o‐nitrobenzoic acid: alternative ways to avoid the O…O clash

Polymorphism is a challenging phenomenon and the competitive packing alternatives which are characteristic for polymorphs may be encountered for essentially rigid molecules. A second crystal form of the well known compound o‐nitrobenzoic acid, C₇H₅NO₄, an important intermediate in the production of dyes, pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals, is described. Although obtained serendipitously, its intra‐ and intermolecular features match expectations from database searches and theoretical calculations. O—H…O hydrogen‐bonded carboxylic acid dimers represent the building blocks in both polymorphs. For steric reasons and in agreement with a calculated potential energy surface, the carboxylic acid and nitro groups cannot simultaneously be coplanar with the benzene ring but have to tilt. In the well established crystal form, this out‐of‐plane torsion is more pronounced for the nitro substituent. In contrast, the new polymorph is characterized by a major tilt of the carboxylic acid group. The molecules in both alternative crystal forms achieve a similar compromise with respect to acceptable intramolecular O…O contacts.     

A comparative study of two polymorphs of bis(1‐hydroxy‐2‐methylpropan‐2‐aminium) carbonate

Alkanolamines have been known for their high CO₂ absorption for over 60 years and are used widely in the natural gas industry for reversible CO₂ capture. In an attempt to crystallize a salt of (RS)‐2‐(3‐benzoylphenyl)propionic acid with 2‐amino‐2‐methylpropan‐1‐ol, we obtained instead a polymorph (denoted polymorph II) of bis(1‐hydroxy‐2‐methylpropan‐2‐aminium) carbonate, 2C₄H₁₂NO⁺·CO₃²⁻, (I), suggesting that the amine group of the former compound captured CO₂ from the atmosphere forming the aminium carbonate salt. This new polymorph was characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis at low temperature (100 K). The salt crystallizes in the monoclinic system (space group C2/c, Z = 4), while a previously reported form of the same salt (denoted polymorph I) crystallizes in the triclinic system (space group P, Z = 2) [Barzagli et al. (2012). ChemSusChem, 5 , 1724–1731]. The asymmetric unit of polymorph II contains one 1‐hydroxy‐2‐methylpropan‐2‐aminium cation and half a carbonate anion, located on a twofold axis, while the asymmetric unit of polymorph I contains two cations and one anion. These polymorphs exhibit similar structural features in their three‐dimensional packing. Indeed, similar layers of an alternating cation–anion–cation neutral structure are observed in their molecular arrangements. Within each layer, carbonate anions and 1‐hydroxy‐2‐methylpropan‐2‐aminium cations form planes bound to each other through N—H…O and O—H…O hydrogen bonds. In both polymorphs, the layers are linked to each other via van der Waals interactions and C—H…O contacts. In polymorph II, a highly directional C—H…O contact (C—H…O = 156°) shows as a hydrogen‐bonding interaction. Periodic theoretical density functional theory (DFT) calculations indicate that both polymorphs present very similar stabilities.     

Concomitant polymorphic forms of 3‐cyclopropyl‐5‐(2‐hydrazinylpyridin‐3‐yl)‐1,2,4‐oxadiazole

The dipharmacophore compound 3‐cyclopropyl‐5‐(2‐hydrazinylpyridin‐3‐yl)‐1,2,4‐oxadiazole, C₁₀H₁₁N₅O, was studied on the assumption of its potential biological activity. Two concomitant polymorphs were obtained on crystallization from isopropanol solution and these were thoroughly studied. Identical conformations of the molecules are found in both structures despite the low difference in energy between the four possible conformers. The two polymorphs differ crucially with respect to their crystal structures. A centrosymmetric dimer formed due to both stacking interactions of the `head‐to‐tail' type and N—H…N(π) hydrogen bonds is the building unit in the triclinic structure. The dimeric building units form an isotropic packing. In the orthorhombic polymorphic structure, the molecules form stacking interactions of the `head‐to‐head' type, which results in their organization in a column as the primary basic structural motif. The formation of N—H…N(lone pair) hydrogen bonds between two neighbouring columns allows the formation of a double column as the main structural motif. The correct packing motifs in the two polymorphs could not be identified without calculations of the pairwise interaction energies. The triclinic structure has a higher density and a lower (by 0.60 kcal mol^?1) lattice energy according to periodic calculations compared to the orthorhombic structure. This allows us to presume that the triclinic form of 3‐cyclopropyl‐5‐(2‐hydrazinylpyridin‐3‐yl)‐1,2,4‐oxadiazole is the more stable.     

Polymorphism of the dinuclear CoIII–Schiff base complex [Co2(o‐van‐en)3]·4CH3CN (o‐van‐en is a salen‐type ligand)

Reactions of Co(OH)₂ with the Schiff base bis(2‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxybenzylidene)ethylenediamine, denoted H₂(o‐van‐en), under different conditions yielded the previously reported complex aqua[bis(3‐methoxy‐2‐oxidobenzylidene)ethylenediamine]cobalt(II), [Co(C₁₈H₁₈N₂O₄)(H₂O)], 1 , under anaerobic conditions and two polymorphs of [μ‐bis(3‐methoxy‐2‐oxidobenzylidene)ethylenediamine]bis{[bis(3‐methoxy‐2‐oxidobenzylidene)ethylenediamine]cobalt(III)} acetonitrile tetrasolvate, [Co₂(C₁₈H₁₈N₂O₄)₃]·4CH₃CN, i.e. monoclinic 2 and triclinic 3 , in the presence of air. Both novel polymorphs were chemically and spectroscopically characterized. Their crystal structures are built up of centrosymmetric dinuclear [Co₂(o‐van‐en)₃] complex molecules, in which each Co^III atom is coordinated by one tetradentate dianionic o‐van‐en ligand in an uncommon bent fashion. The pseudo‐octahedral coordination of the Co^III atom is completed by one phenolate O and one amidic N atom of the same arm of the bridging o‐van‐en ligand. In addition, the asymmetric units of both polymorphs contain two acetonitrile solvent molecules. The polymorphs differ in the packing orders of the dinuclear [Co₂(o‐van‐en)₃] complex molecules, i.e. alternating ABABAB in 2 and AAA in 3 . In addition, differences in the conformations, the positions of the acetonitrile solvent molecules and the pattern of intermolecular interactions were observed. Hirshfeld surface analysis permits a qualitative inspection of the differences in the intermolecular space in the two polymorphs. A knowledge‐based study employing Full Interaction Maps was used to elucidate possible reasons for the polymorphism.     

Exploring the structural landscape of 2‐(thiophen‐2‐yl)‐1,3‐benzothiazole: high‐Z′ packing polymorphism and cocrystallization with calix[4]tube

We report here for the first time a cocrystal of the so‐called neutral calix[4]tube, which is two tail‐to‐tail‐arranged and partially deprotonated tetrakis(carboxymethoxy)calix[4]arenes, including three sodium ions, with 2‐(thiophen‐2‐yl)‐1,3‐benzothiazole, namely trisodium bis(carboxymethoxy)bis(carboxylatomethoxy)calix[4]arene tris(carboxymethoxy)(carboxylatomethoxy)calix[4]arene–2‐(thiophen‐2‐yl)‐1,3‐benzothiazole–dimethyl sulfoxide–water (1/1/2/2), 3Na⁺·C₃₆H₃₀O₁₂^2?·C₃₆H₃₁O₁₂^?·C₁₁H₇NS₂·2C₂H₆OS·2H₂O, which provides a new approach into the host–guest chemistry of inclusion complexes. Three packing polymorphs of the same benzothiazole with high Z′ (one with Z′ = 8 and two with Z′ = 4) were also discovered in the course of our desired cocrystallization. The inspection of these polymorphs and a previously known polymorph with Z′ = 2 revealed that Z′ increases as the strength of intermolecular contacts decreases. Also, these results expand the frontier of invoking calixarenes as a host for nonsolvent small molecules, besides providing knowledge on the rare formation of high‐Z′ packing polymorphs of simple molecules, such as the target benzothiazole.     

Effect of High Pressure on the Polymorphs of Paracetamol

Effect of hydrostatic pressure on the two (I – monoclinic and II – orthorhombic) polymorphs of paracetamol was studied by X-ray diffraction in the diamond anvil cell at pressures up to 4.5 GPa (for the monoclinic form) and up to 5.5 GPa (for the orthorhombic form). The two groups of phenomena were studied: (i) the anisotropic structural distortion of the same polymorph, (ii) transitions between the polymorphs induced by pressure. The anisotropy of structural distortion of polymorphs I and II was well reproducible from sample to sample, also from powder samples to single crystals. The bulk compressibility of the two forms was shown to be practically the same. However, a noticeable qualitative difference in the anisotropy of structural distortion was observed: with increasing pressure the structure of polymorph II contracted in all the directions showing isotropic compression in the planes of hydrogen-bonded molecular layers, whereas the layers in the structure of the polymorph I expanded in some directions. Maximum compression in both polymorphs I and II was observed in the directions normal to the molecular layers. The transitions between the polymorphs induced by pressure were poorly reproducible and depended strongly on the sample and on the procedure of increasing/decreasing pressure. No phase transitions were induced in the single crystals of the monoclinic polymorph at pressures at least up to 4GPa, although a partial transformation of polymorph I into polymorph II was observed at increased pressure in powder samples. Polymorph II transformed partly into the polymorph I during grinding. The transformation could be hindered if grinding was carried out in CCl₄. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

1H NMR spectra part 31: 1H chemical shifts of amides in DMSO solvent

The ¹H chemical shifts of 48 amides in DMSO solvent are assigned and presented. The solvent shifts Δδ (DMSO‐CDCl₃) are large (1–2 ppm) for the NH protons but smaller and negative (?0.1 to ?0.2 ppm) for close range protons. A selection of the observed solvent shifts is compared with calculated shifts from the present model and from GIAO calculations. Those for the NH protons agree with both calculations, but other solvent shifts such as Δδ(CHO) are not well reproduced by the GIAO calculations. The ¹H chemical shifts of the amides in DMSO were analysed using a functional approach for near ( ≤ 3 bonds removed) protons and the electric field, magnetic anisotropy and steric effect of the amide group for more distant protons. The chemical shifts of the NH protons of acetanilide and benzamide vary linearly with the π density on the αN and βC atoms, respectively. The C=O anisotropy and steric effect are in general little changed from the values in CDCl₃. The effects of substituents F, Cl, Me on the NH proton shifts are reproduced. The electric field coefficient for the protons in DMSO is 90% of that in CDCl₃. There is no steric effect of the C=O oxygen on the NH proton in an NH…O=C hydrogen bond. The observed deshielding is due to the electric field effect. The calculated chemical shifts agree well with the observed shifts (RMS error of 0.106 ppm for the data set of 257 entries). Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Two polymorphs of chlorpropamide: the δ‐form and the high‐temperature ɛ‐form

The ɛ‐form of chlorpropamide [systematic name: 4‐chloro‐N‐(propylaminocarbonyl)benzenesulfonamide], C₁₀H₁₃ClN₂O₃S, has been obtained as single crystals from solution (and not as a polycrystalline sample by heating the α‐, γ‐ or δ‐forms). The results of anisotropic structure refinements for the ɛ‐ and δ‐forms are reported. The density of the δ‐polymorph is the highest, and that of the ɛ‐polymorph the lowest, among the five known chlorpropamide polymorphs. The main intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding pattern in polymorphs δ and ɛ is the same as in polymorphs α, β and γ, but the conformations differ. The densities of the polymorphs were found to depend on the molecular conformations.     

Prevalent polymorphism in benzophenones

We report here the crystal structures of dimorphs of 4‐hydroxybenzophenone, C₁₃H₁₀O₂, and 4‐(dimethylamino)benzophenone, C₁₅H₁₅NO, as well as trimorphs of 4,4′‐dimethylbenzophenone, C₁₅H₁₄O. The polymorphs were isolated from slow‐evaporation conditions or from cocrystallization attempts. The main differences between the polymorphs involve differences in packing rather than differences in conformation, owing to the limited conformational freedom of the three molecules. 4‐Hydroxybenzophenone is the exception, exhibiting almost identical packing arrangements in the two polymorphs, with the only major changes being in the interplanar orientations. The lattice energies of the respective polymorphs of the three compounds reported here are all within 1 kcal mol⁻¹ of each other. The existence of nine further polymorphic benzophenone derivatives in the literature suggests that there is a good deal of polymorphic space in this class of compounds.     

Two novel polymorphic forms of iron‐chelating agent deferiprone

Thalassemia is a genetic blood disorder requiring life‐long blood transfusions. This process often results in iron overload and can be treated by an iron‐chelating agent, like deferiprone (3‐hydroxy‐1,2‐dimethylpyridin‐4‐one), C₇H₉NO₂, in an oral formulation. The first crystal structure of deferiprone, (Ia), was reported in 1988 [Nelson et al. (1988). Can. J. Chem. 66 , 123–131]. In the present study, two novel polymorphic forms, (Ib) and (Ic), of deferiprone were identified concomitantly with polymorph (Ia) during the crystallization experiments. Polymorph (Ia) was redetermined at low temperature for comparison of the structural features and lattice energy values with polymorphs (Ib) and (Ic). Polymorph (Ia) crystallized in the orthorhombic space group Pbca, whereas both polymorphs (Ib) and (Ic) crystallized in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c. The asymmetric units of (Ia) and (Ib) contain one deferiprone molecule, while polymorph (Ic) has three crystallographically independent molecules (A, B and C). All three polymorphs have similar hydrogen‐bonding features, such as an R₂²(10) dimer formed by O—H…O hydrogen bonds, an R₄³(20) tetramer formed by C—H…O hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions, but the polymorphs differ in their molecular arrangements in the solid state and are classified as packing polymorphs. O—H…O and C—H…O hydrogen bonds lead to the formation of two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded parallel sheets which are interlinked by π–π stacking interactions. In the three‐dimensional crystal packing, the deferiprone molecules were aggregated as corrugated sheets in polymorphs (Ia) and (Ic), whereas in polymorph (Ib), they were aggregated as a square‐grid network. The characteristic crystalline peaks of polymorphs (Ia), (Ib) and (Ic) were established through powder X‐ray diffraction analysis. The Rietveld analysis was also performed to estimate the contribution of the polymorphs to the bulk material.     

Crystal structures of sulfathiazole polymorphs in the temperature range 100–295 K: A comparative analysis

The response of four polymorph modifications of sulfathiazole C₉H₉N₃O₂S₂ to variation of temperature was examined in the range 295–100 K by single crystal X-ray diffraction. No phase transitions occur in this temperature range; all the structures exhibit anisotropic contraction. The metastable sulfathiazole modification I is drastically different from the other modifications (II, III, and IV) in the anisotropy of structure distortions and changes in the intra-and intermolecular geometry, although bulk thermal expansion is virtually similar for all polymorphs within the temperature range studied.     

1H NMR spectra. Part 30: 1H chemical shifts in amides and the magnetic anisotropy,electric field and steric effects of the amide group

The ¹H spectra of 37 amides in CDCl₃ solvent were analysed and the chemical shifts obtained. The molecular geometries and conformational analysis of these amides were considered in detail. The NMR spectral assignments are of interest, e.g. the assignments of the formamide NH₂ protons reverse in going from CDCl₃ to more polar solvents. The substituent chemical shifts of the amide group in both aliphatic and aromatic amides were analysed using an approach based on neural network data for near (≤3 bonds removed) protons and the electric field, magnetic anisotropy, steric and for aromatic systems π effects of the amide group for more distant protons. The electric field is calculated from the partial atomic charges on the N.C═O atoms of the amide group. The magnetic anisotropy of the carbonyl group was reproduced with the asymmetric magnetic anisotropy acting at the midpoint of the carbonyl bond. The values of the anisotropies Δχ_parl and Δχ_perp were for the aliphatic amides 10.53 and ?23.67 (×10^?6 ų/molecule) and for the aromatic amides 2.12 and ?10.43 (×10^?6 ų/molecule). The nitrogen anisotropy was 7.62 (×10^?6 ų/molecule). These values are compared with previous literature values. The ¹H chemical shifts were calculated from the semi‐empirical approach and also by gauge‐independent atomic orbital calculations with the density functional theory method and B3LYP/6–31G⁺⁺ (d,p) basis set. The semi‐empirical approach gave good agreement with root mean square error of 0.081 ppm for the data set of 280 entries. The gauge‐independent atomic orbital approach was generally acceptable, but significant errors (ca. 1 ppm) were found for the NH and CHO protons and also for some other protons. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Chlorido(2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18‐octaethylporphyrinato)iron(III): a new triclinic polymorph of Fe(OEP)Cl

The previous structure determination of the title compound, [Fe(C₃₆H₄₄N₄)Cl], was of a monoclinic polymorph [Senge (2005). Acta Cryst. E 61 , m399–m400]. The crystal structure of a new triclinic polymorph has been determined based on single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction data collected at 100 K. The asymmetric unit contains one molecule of the high‐spin square‐pyramidal iron(III) porphyrinate. The structure exhibits distinct nonstatistical alternative positions for most atoms and was consequently modeled as a whole‐molecule disorder. The compound is characterized by an average Fe—N bond length of 2.065 (2) Å, an Fe—Cl bond length of 2.225 (4) Å, and the iron(III) cation displaced by 0.494 (4) Å from the plane of the 24‐atom porphyrinate core, essentially the same as in the previously determined polymorph. Common features of the porphyrin plane–plane stacking involve two types of synthons, each of which can be further stabilized with additional H...Cl interactions to the axial chloride ligand, exhibiting concerted interactions of H atoms from the ethyl groups with the π‐cloud electron density of adjacent molecules; the shortest methylene H‐atom contacts are in the range 2.75–2.91 Å, resulting in plane–plane separations of 3.407 (4) and 3.416 (4) Å, and the shortest methyl H‐atom contacts are 2.56–2.95 Å, resulting in plane–plane separations of 4.900 (5) and 4.909 (5) Å in the monoclinic polymorph. The plane‐to‐plane stacking synthons in the triclinic polymorph are similar, but at greater distances; the shortest methylene H‐atom contacts are 2.86–2.94 Å, resulting in plane–plane separations of 3.45 (2) and 3.45 (3) Å, and the shortest methyl H‐atom contacts are 2.89–3.20 Å, resulting in plane–plane separations of 5.081 (13) and 5.134 (13) Å, consistent with the density of the triclinic polymorph being 1.5% lower, suggesting lesser packing efficiency and lower stability in the triclinic polymorph. The major molecular differences found in the polymorphs is in three different orientations of the ethyl‐group side chains on the periphery of the porphyrin core.     

Concomitant but disappearing: two polymorphs of 1,4‐bis(tribromomethyl)benzene

The title compound, C₈H₄Br₆, (I), initially crystallized from deuterochloroform as the comcomitant polymorphs (Ia) (prisms, space group P2₁/n, Z = 2) and (Ib) (hexagonal plates, space group C2/c, Z = 4). The molecules in both forms display crystallographic inversion symmetry. All further attempts to crystallize the compound led exclusively to (Ib), so that (Ia) may be regarded as a `disappearing polymorph'. Surprisingly, however, the density of (Ia) is greater than that of (Ib). The only significant difference between the molecular structures is the orientation of the CBr<sub>3</sub> groups. The molecular packing of both structures is largely determined by Br...Br interactions, although (Ia) also displays a C—H...Br hydrogen bond and both polymorphs display one Br...π contact. For (Ia), six of the eight contacts combine to form a tube‐like substructure parallel to the a axis. For (Ib), the two shortest Br...Br contacts link `half' molecules consisting of C—CBr₃ groups to form double layers parallel to (001) in the regions z≃, .     

5‐Iodobenzofurazan 1‐oxide: polymorphs,pseudosymmetry and disorder

5‐Iodobenzofurazan 1‐oxide (systematic name: 5‐iodobenzo‐1,2,5‐oxadiazole 1‐oxide), C₆H₃IN₂O₂, occurs in two polymorphic forms, both monoclinic in P2₁/c with Z′ = 2. The intermolecular interactions in the two polymorphs are quite different. In polymorph (I), there are strong intermolecular I...O interactions, with I...O distances of 3.114 (8) and 3.045 (8) Å. In polymorph (II), there are strong intermolecular I...N interactions, with I...N distances of 3.163 (4) and 3.175 (5) Å. In (I), there is about 15% disorder in one molecule and about 5% in the other. In both polymorphs, there are pseudosymmetric relationships between the crystallographically independent molecules.     

4‐(4‐Chlorobenzylidenehydrazonomethyl)benzonitrile and the bromo and iodo analogs

4‐Cyano‐4′‐chlorobenzalazine [systematic name: 4‐(4‐chlorobenzylidenehydrazonomethyl)benzonitrile], C₁₅H₁₀ClN₃, occurs in two polymorphs. Polymorph A is isostructural with the corresponding dichloro compound. Polymorph B is isostructural with the bromo and iodo analogs, viz. C₁₅H₁₀BrN₃ and C₁₅H₁₀IN₃, respectively. The latter three structures all have approximately linear C—N...X—C intermolecular contacts in which the N...X contact distances are longer than those in the corresponding benzylideneanilines.