Mononuclear and three‐dimensional metal complexes based on a multidentate hydrazone ligand

A potentially pentadentate hydrazone ligand, N′‐[1‐(pyrazin‐2‐yl)ethylidene]nicotinohydrazide (HL), was prepared from the condensation reaction of nicotinohydrazide and acetylpyrazine. Reactions of HL with MnCl₂, Mn(CH₃COO)₂ and Cd(CH₃COO)₂ afforded three metal complexes, namely dichlorido{N′‐[1‐(pyrazin‐2‐yl‐κN¹)ethylidene]nicotinohydrazide‐κ²N′,O}manganese(II), [MnCl₂(C₁₂H₁₁N₅O)], (I), bis{N′‐[1‐(pyrazin‐2‐yl‐κN¹)ethylidene]nicotinohydrazidato‐κ²N′,O]manganese(II), [Mn(C₁₂H₁₀N₅O)₂], (II), and poly[[(acetato‐κ²O,O′){μ₃‐N′‐[1‐(pyrazin‐2‐yl‐κ²N¹:N⁴)ethylidene]nicotinohydrazidato‐κ³N′,O:N¹}cadmium(II)] chloroform disolvate], {[Cd(C₁₂H₁₀N₅O)(CH₃COO)]·2CHCl₃}_n, (III), respectively. Complex (I) has a mononuclear structure, the Mn^II centre adopting a distorted square‐pyramidal coordination. Complex (II) also has a mononuclear structure, with the Mn^II centre occupying a special position (C₂ symmetry) and adopting a distorted octahedral coordination environment, which is defined by two O atoms and four N atoms from two N′‐[1‐(pyrazin‐2‐yl)ethylidene]nicotinohydrazidate (L⁻) ligands related via a crystallographic twofold axis. Complex (III) features a unique three‐dimensional network with rectangular channels, and the L⁻ ligand also serves as a counter‐anion. The coordination geometry of the Cd^II centre is pentagonal bipyramidal. This study demonstrates that HL, which can act as either a neutral or a mono‐anionic ligand, is useful in the construction of interesting metal–organic compounds.     

Two nickel(II) bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine complexes with homophthalic and benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylic acids

Two new Ni^II complexes involving the ancillary ligand bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine (bpma) and two different carboxylate ligands, i.e. homophthalate [hph; systematic name: 2‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)acetate] and benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylate (btc), namely catena‐poly[[aqua{bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}nickel(II)]‐μ‐2‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)aceteto‐κ²O:O′], [Ni(C₉H₆O₄)(C₁₂H₁₃N₃)(H₂O)]_n, and (μ‐benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylato‐κ⁴O¹,O²:O⁴,O⁵)bis(aqua{bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}nickel(II)) bis(triaqua{bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}nickel(II)) benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylate hexahydrate, [Ni₂(C₁₀H₂O₈)(C₁₂H₁₃N₃)₂(H₂O)₂]·[Ni(C₁₂H₁₃N₃)(H₂O)₃]₂(C₁₀H₂O₈)·6H₂O, (II), are presented. Compound (I) is a one‐dimensional polymer with hph acting as a bridging ligand and with the chains linked by weak C—H...O interactions. The structure of compound (II) is much more complex, with two independent Ni^II centres having different environments, one of them as part of centrosymmetric [Ni(bpma)(H₂O)]₂(btc) dinuclear complexes and the other in mononuclear [Ni(bpma)(H₂O)₃]²⁺ cations which (in a 2:1 ratio) provide charge balance for btc⁴⁻ anions. A profuse hydrogen‐bonding scheme, where both coordinated and crystal water molecules play a crucial role, provides the supramolecular linkage of the different groups.     

Zoledronate complexes. III. Two zoledronate complexes with alkaline earth metals: [Mg(C5H9N2O7P2)2(H2O)2] and [Ca(C5H8N2O7P2)(H2O)]n

Diaquabis[dihydrogen 1‐hydroxy‐2‐(imidazol‐3‐ium‐1‐yl)ethylidene‐1,1‐diphosphonato‐κ²O,O′]magnesium(II), [Mg(C₅H₉N₂O₇P₂)₂(H₂O)₂], consists of isolated dimeric units built up around an inversion centre and tightly interconnected by hydrogen bonding. The Mg^II cation resides at the symmetry centre, surrounded in a rather regular octahedral geometry by two chelating zwitterionic zoledronate(1−) [or dihydrogen 1‐hydroxy‐2‐(imidazol‐3‐ium‐1‐yl)ethylidene‐1,1‐diphosphonate] anions and two water molecules, in a pattern already found in a few reported isologues where the anion is bound to transition metals (Co, Zn and Ni). catena‐Poly[[aquacalcium(II)]‐μ₃‐[hydrogen 1‐hydroxy‐2‐(imidazol‐3‐ium‐1‐yl)ethylidene‐1,1‐diphosphonato]‐κ⁵O:O,O′:O′,O′′], [Ca(C₅H₈N₂O₇P₂)(H₂O)]_n, consists instead of a Ca^II cation in a general position, a zwitterionic zoledronate(2−) anion and a coordinated water molecule. The geometry around the Ca^II atom, provided by six bisphosphonate O atoms and one water ligand, is that of a pentagonal bipyramid with the Ca^II atom displaced by 0.19 Å out of the equatorial plane. These Ca^II coordination polyhedra are `threaded' by the 2₁ axis so that successive polyhedra share edges of their pentagonal basal planes. This results in a strongly coupled rhomboidal Ca₂–O₂ chain which runs along [010]. These chains are in turn linked by an apical O atom from a –PO₃ group in a neighbouring chain. This O‐atom, shared between chains, generates strong covalently bonded planar arrays parallel to (100). Finally, these sheets are linked by hydrogen bonds into a three‐dimensional structure. Owing to the extreme affinity of zoledronic acid for bone tissue, in general, and with calcium as one of the major constituents of bone, it is expected that this structure will be useful in modelling some of the biologically interesting processes in which the drug takes part.     

Structural studies of (prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine hetero‐scorpionate copper complexes

The structures of five compounds consisting of (prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine complexed with copper in both the Cu^I and Cu^II oxidation states are presented, namely chlorido{(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}copper(I) 0.18‐hydrate, [CuCl(C₁₅H₁₇N₃)]·0.18H₂O, (1), catena‐poly[[copper(I)‐μ₂‐(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine‐κ⁵N,N′,N′′:C²,C³] perchlorate acetonitrile monosolvate], {[Cu(C₁₅H₁₇N₃)]ClO₄·CH₃CN}_n, (2), dichlorido{(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}copper(II) dichloromethane monosolvate, [CuCl₂(C₁₅H₁₇N₃)]·CH₂Cl₂, (3), chlorido{(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}copper(II) perchlorate, [CuCl(C₁₅H₁₇N₃)]ClO₄, (4), and di‐μ‐chlorido‐bis({(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}copper(II)) bis(tetraphenylborate), [Cu₂Cl₂(C₁₅H₁₇N₃)₂][(C₆H₅)₄B]₂, (5). Systematic variation of the anion from a coordinating chloride to a noncoordinating perchlorate for two Cu^I complexes results in either a discrete molecular species, as in (1), or a one‐dimensional chain structure, as in (2). In complex (1), there are two crystallographically independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. Complex (2) consists of the Cu^I atom coordinated by the amine and pyridyl N atoms of one ligand and by the vinyl moiety of another unit related by the crystallographic screw axis, yielding a one‐dimensional chain parallel to the crystallographic b axis. Three complexes with Cu^II show that varying the anion composition from two chlorides, to a chloride and a perchlorate to a chloride and a tetraphenylborate results in discrete molecular species, as in (3) and (4), or a bridged bis‐μ‐chlorido complex, as in (5). Complex (3) shows two strongly bound Cl atoms, while complex (4) has one strongly bound Cl atom and a weaker coordination by one perchlorate O atom. The large noncoordinating tetraphenylborate anion in complex (5) results in the core‐bridged Cu₂Cl₂ moiety.     

Dinuclear cobalt and nickel complexes of a mercaptoacetic acid substituted 1,2,4‐triazole ligand: syntheses,structures and urease inhibitory studies

Because of its versatile coordination modes and strong coordination ability, the mercaptoacetic acid substituted 1,2,4‐triazole 2‐{[5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐3‐yl]sulfanyl}acetic acid ( H₂L ) was synthesized and characterized. Treatment of H₂L with cobalt and nickel acetate afforded the dinuclear complexes {μ‐3‐[(carboxylatomethyl)sulfanyl]‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐4‐ido‐κ²N¹,N⁵:N²,O}bis[aqua(methanol‐κO)cobalt(II)] methanol disolvate, [Co₂(C₉H₆N₄O₂S)₂(CH₃OH)₂(H₂O)₂]·2CH₃OH ( 1 ), and {μ‐3‐[(carboxylatomethyl)sulfanyl]‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐4‐ido‐κ²N¹,N⁵:N²,O}bis[diaquanickel(II)] methanol disolvate dihydrate, [Ni₂(C₉H₆N₄O₂S)₂(H₂O)₄]·2CH₃OH·2H₂O ( 2 ), respectively. Complex 1 crystallized in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c, while 2 crystallized in the tetragonal space group I4₁/a. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies revealed that H₂L is doubly deprotonated and acts as a tetradentate bridging ligand in complexes 1 and 2 . For both of the obtained complexes, extensive hydrogen‐bond interactions contribute to the formation of their three‐dimensional supermolecular structures. Hirshfeld surface analysis was used to illustrate the intermolecular interactions. Additionally, the urease inhibitory activities of 1 , 2 and H₂L were investigated against jack bean urease, where the two complexes revealed strong urease inhibition activities.     

A coordination polymer consisting of two different one‐dimensional copper(II) chains

The title compound, catena‐poly[[[diaqua(methanol‐κO)copper(II)]‐μ‐N‐(4‐methylpyrimidin‐2‐yl‐κN¹)pyrazin‐2‐amine‐κ²N¹:N⁴] [[aqua(aqua/methanol‐κO)(perchlorato‐κO)copper(II)]‐μ‐N‐(4‐methylpyrimidin‐2‐yl‐κN¹)pyrazin‐2‐amine‐κ²N¹:N⁴] tris(perchlorate) methanol monosolvate 1.419‐hydrate], {[Cu(C₉H₉N₅)(CH₃OH)(H₂O)₂][Cu(C₉H₉N₅)(ClO₄)(CH₃OH)_0.581(H₂O)_1.419](ClO₄)₃·CH₃OH·1.419H₂O}_n, is a one‐dimensional straight‐chain polymer of N‐(4‐methylpyrimidin‐2‐yl)pyrazin‐2‐amine (L) with Cu(ClO₄)₂. The complex consists of two crystallographically independent one‐dimensional chains in which the Cu^II atoms exhibit two different octahedral coordination geometries. The L ligand coordinates to two Cu^II centres in a tridentate manner, with the pyrazine ring acting as a bridge linking the Cu^II coordination units and building an infinite one‐dimensional chain. Extensive hydrogen bonding among perchlorate anions, water molecules and L ligands results in three‐dimensional networks.     

Structural comparison of group 7 tricarbonyl complexes of 2‐{[2‐(1H‐imidazol‐4‐yl)ethyl]iminomethyl}‐5‐methylphenolate

Two tricarbonyl complexes of rhenium(I) and manganese(I) coordinated by the ligand 2‐{[2‐(1H‐imidazol‐4‐yl)ethyl]iminomethyl}‐5‐methylphenolate are reported, viz. fac‐tricarbonyl(2‐{[2‐(1H‐imidazol‐4‐yl‐κN³)ethyl]iminomethyl‐κN}‐5‐methylphenolato‐κO)rhenium(I) methanol monosolvate, [Re(C₁₆H₁₄N₃O₄)(CO)₃]·CH₃OH, (I), and fac‐tricarbonyl(2‐{[2‐(1H‐imidazol‐4‐yl‐κN³)ethyl]iminomethyl‐κN}‐5‐methylphenolato‐κO)manganese(I), fac‐[Mn(C₁₆H₁₄N₃O₄)(CO)₃], (II), display facial coordination in a distorted octahedral environment. The crystal structure of (I) is stabilized by O—H...O, N—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen‐bond interactions, while that of (II) is stabilized by N—H...O hydrogen‐bond interactions only. These interactions result in two‐dimensional networks and π–π stacking for both structures.     

Dinuclear cobalt(II) complexes with double phosphate ester bridges and tetradentate ligands having anisole or quinoline appendages

Phosphate esters provide a rigid and stable polymeric backbone in nucleic acids. Metal complexes with phosphate ester groups have been synthesized as structural and spectroscopic models of phosphate‐containing enzymes. Dinucleating ligands are used extensively to synthesize model complexes since they provide the support required to stabilize such complexes. The crystal structures of two dinuclear Co^II complexes, namely bis(μ‐diphenyl phosphato‐κ²O :O ′)bis({2‐methoxy‐N ,N‐bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]aniline‐κ⁴N ,N ′,N ′′,O }cobalt(II)) bis(perchlorate), [Co(C₁₂H₁₀O₄P)₂(C₁₉H₁₉N₃O)₂](ClO₄)₂, and bis(μ‐diphenyl phosphato‐κ²O :O ′)bis({N ,N‐bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]quinolin‐8‐amine‐κ⁴N ,N ′,N ′′,O }cobalt(II)) bis(perchlorate), [Co(C₁₂H₁₀O₄P)₂(C₂₁H₁₈N₄)₂](ClO₄)₂, with tetradentate 2‐methoxy‐N ,N‐bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]aniline (L ¹) and N ,N‐bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]quinolin‐8‐amine (L ²) ligands are reported. The complexes have similar structures, with distorted octahedral geometries around the metal centres. Both are centrosymmetric (Z ′ = 0.5), with the Co^II centres doubly bridged by diphenyl phosphate ester groups. A number of aromatic–aromatic interactions are present and differ between the two complexes as the anisole group in L ¹ is replaced by a quinoline group in L ². A detailed study of these interactions is presented.     

Structural and spectroscopic characterization of two new blue luminescent pyridylbenzimidazole zinc(II) complexes

Luminescent metal complexes are used in photooptical devices. Zinc(II) complexes are of interest because of the ability to tune their color, their high thermal stability and their favorable carrier transport character. In particular, some zinc(II) complexes with aryl diimine and/or heterocyclic ligands have been shown to emit brightly in the blue region of the spectrum. Zinc(II) complexes bearing derivatized imidazoles have been explored for possible optoelectronic applications. The structures of two zinc(II) complexes of 5,6‐dimethyl‐2‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1‐[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐benzimidazole (L), namely dichlorido(dimethylformamide‐κO){5,6‐dimethyl‐2‐(pyridin‐2‐yl‐κN)‐1‐[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐benzimidazole‐κN³}zinc(II) dimethylformamide monosolvate, [ZnCl₂(C₂₀H₁₈N₄)(C₃H₇NO)]·C₃H₇NO, (I), and bis(acetato‐κ²O,O′){5,6‐dimethyl‐2‐(pyridin‐2‐yl‐κN)‐1‐[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐benzimidazole‐κN³}zinc(II) ethanol monosolvate, [Zn(C₂H₃O₂)₂(C₂₀H₁₈N₄)]·C₂H₅OH, (II), are reported. Complex (I) crystallized as a dimethylformamide solvate and exhibits a distorted trigonal bipyramidal coordination geometry. The coordination sphere consists of a bidentate L ligand spanning axial to equatorial sites, two chloride ligands in equatorial sites, and an O‐bound dimethylformamide ligand in the remaining axial site. The other complex, (II), crystallized as an ethanol solvate. The Zn^II atom has a distorted trigonal prismatic coordination geometry, with two bidentate acetate ligands occupying two edges and a bidentate L ligand occupying the third edge of the prism. Complexes (I) and (II) emit in the blue region of the spectrum. The results of density functional theory (DFT) calculations suggest that the luminescence of L results from π*←π transitions and that the luminescence of the complexes results from interligand charge‐transfer transitions. The orientation of the 2‐(pyridin‐2‐yl) substituent with respect to the benzimidazole system was found to have an impact on the calculated HOMO–LUMO gap (HOMO is highest occupied molecular orbital and LUMO is lowest unoccupied molecular orbital).     

Two isomorphous ZnII/CoII complexes with tri‐tert‐butoxysilanethiol and histamine,and (4‐hydroxymethyl‐1H‐imidazole‐κN)bis(tri‐tert‐butoxysilanethiolato‐κ2O,S)zinc(II)

The complexes [2‐(1H‐imidazol‐4‐yl‐κN³)ethylamine‐κN]bis(tri‐tert‐butoxysilanethiolato‐κS)cobalt(II), [Co(C₁₂H₂₇O₃SSi)₂(C₅H₉N₃)], and [2‐(1H‐imidazol‐4‐yl‐κN³)ethylamine‐κN]bis(tri‐tert‐butoxysilanethiolato‐κS)zinc(II), [Zn(C₁₂H₂₇O₃SSi)₂(C₅H₉N₃)], are isomorphous. The central Zn^II/Co^II ions are surrounded by two S atoms from the tri‐tert‐butoxysilanethiolate ligand and by two N atoms from the chelating histamine ligand in a distorted tetrahedral geometry, with two intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interactions between the histamine NH₂ groups and tert‐butoxy O atoms. Molecules of the complexes are joined into dimers via two intermolecular bifurcated N—H...(S,O) hydrogen bonds. The Zn^II atom in [(1H‐imidazol‐4‐yl‐κN³)methanol]bis(tri‐tert‐butoxysilanethiolato‐κ²O,S)zinc(II), [Zn(C₁₂H₂₇O₃SSi)₂(C₄H₆N₂O)], is five‐coordinated by two O and two S atoms from the O,S‐chelating silanethiolate ligand and by one N atom from (1H‐imidazol‐4‐yl)methanol; the hydroxy group forms an intramolecular hydrogen bond with sulfur. Molecules of this complex pack as zigzag chains linked by N—H...O hydrogen bonds. These structures provide reference details for cysteine‐ and histidine‐ligated metal centers in proteins.     

Structural studies and antileishmanial activity of 2‐acetylpyridine and 2‐benzoylpyridine nitroimidazole‐derived hydrazones

Three imidazole hydrazone compounds, namely 2‐(4‐nitro‐1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)‐N′‐[1‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)ethylidene]acetohydrazide, C₁₂H₁₂N₆O₃, ( 1 ), 2‐(2‐nitro‐1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)‐N′‐[1‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)ethylidene]acetohydrazide, C₁₂H₁₂N₆O₃, ( 2 ), and 2‐(2‐nitro‐1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)‐N′‐[(phenyl)(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]acetohydrazide, C₁₇H₁₄N₆O₃, ( 3 ), were obtained and fully characterized, including their crystal structure determinations. While all the compounds proved not to be cytotoxic to J774.A1 macrophage cells, ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) exhibited activity against Leishmania chagasi, whereas ( 2 ) was revealed to be inactive. Since both ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) exhibited antileishmanial effects, while ( 2 ) was devoid of activity, the presence of the acetyl or benzoyl groups was possibly not a determining factor in the observed antiprotozoal activity. In contrast, since ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) are 4‐nitroimidazole derivatives and ( 2 ) is a 2‐nitroimidazole‐derived compound, the presence of the 4‐nitro group probably favours antileishmanial activity over the 2‐nitro group. The results suggested that further investigations on compounds ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) as bioreducible antileishmanial prodrug candidates are called for.     

The crystal and molecular structures of three copper‐containing complexes and their activities in mimicking galactose oxidase

The structures of three copper‐containing complexes, namely (benzoato‐κ²O,O′)[(E)‐2‐({[2‐(diethylamino)ethyl]imino}methyl)phenolato‐κ³N,N′,O]copper(II) dihydrate, [Cu(C₇H₅O₂)(C₁₃H₁₉N₂O)]·2H₂O, 1 , [(E)‐2‐({[2‐(diethylamino)ethyl]imino}methyl)phenolato‐κ³N,N′,O](2‐phenylacetato‐κ²O,O′)copper(II), [Cu(C₈H₇O₂)(C₁₃H₁₉N₂O)], 2 , and bis[μ‐(E)‐2‐({[3‐(diethylamino)propyl]imino}methyl)phenolato]‐κ⁴N,N′,O:O;κ⁴O:N,N′,O‐(μ‐2‐methylbenzoato‐κ²O:O′)copper(II) perchlorate, [Cu₂(C₈H₇O₂)(C₁₂H₁₇N₂O)₂]ClO₄, 3 , have been reported and all have been tested for their activity in the oxidation of d ‐galactose. The results suggest that, unlike the enzyme galactose oxidase, due to the precipitation of Cu₂O, this reaction is not catalytic as would have been expected. The structures of 1 and 2 are monomeric, while 3 consists of a dimeric cation and a perchlorate anion [which is disordered over two orientations, with occupancies of 0.64 (4) and 0.36 (4)]. In all three structures, the central Cu atom is five‐coordinated in a distorted square‐pyramidal arrangment (τ parameter of 0.0932 for 1 , 0.0888 for 2 , and 0.142 and 0.248 for the two Cu centers in 3 ). In each species, the environment about the Cu atom is such that the vacant sixth position is open, with very little steric crowding.     

Two new zinc(II) and mercury(II) complexes based on N,N′‐(cyclohexane‐1,2‐diylidene)bis(4‐fluorobenzohydrazide): synthesis,crystal structures and antibacterial activities

Reaction of N,N′‐(cyclohexane‐1,2‐diylidene)bis(4‐fluorobenzohydrazide), C₂₀H₁₈F₂N₄O₂, ( L^F ), with zinc chloride and mercury(II) chloride produced different types and shapes of neutral coordination complexes, namely, dichlorido[N,N′‐(cyclohexane‐1,2‐diylidene)bis(4‐fluorobenzohydrazide)‐κ²N,O]zinc(II), [ZnCl₂(C₂₀H₁₈F₂N₄O₂)], ( 1 ), and dichlorido[N,N′‐(cyclohexane‐1,2‐diylidene)bis(4‐fluorobenzohydrazide)‐κ⁴O,N,N′,O′]mercury(II), [HgCl₂(C₂₀H₁₈F₂N₄O₂)], ( 2 ). The organic ligand and its metal complexes are characterized using various techniques: IR, UV–Vis and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopies, in addition to powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD), single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography and microelemental analysis. Depending upon the data from these analyses and measurements, a typical tetrahedral geometry was confirmed for zinc complex ( 1 ), in which the Zn^II atom is located outside the bis(benzhydrazone) core. The Hg^II atom in ( 2 ) is found within the core and has a common octahedral structure. The in vitro antibacterial activities of the prepared compounds were evaluated against two different bacterial strains, i.e. gram positive Bacillus subtilis and gram negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria. The prepared compounds exhibited differentiated growth‐inhibitory activities against these two bacterial strains based on the difference in their lipophilic nature and structural features.     

One‐pot concomitant preparation of two copper(II) coordination polymers with different configurations of bridging bithiophene ligands

By employing the conjugated bithiophene ligand 5,5′‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)‐2,2′‐bithiophene (bibp), which can exhibit trans and cis conformations, two different Cu^II coordination polymers, namely, poly[[μ‐5,5′‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)‐2,2′‐bithiophene‐κ²N:N′](μ₂‐4,4′‐oxydibenzoato‐κ²O:O′)copper(II)], [Cu(C₁₄H₈O₅)(C₁₄H₁₀N₄S₂)]_n or [Cu(bibp)(oba)]_n, (I), and catena‐poly[μ‐aqua‐bis[μ‐5,5′‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)‐2,2′‐bithiophene‐κ²N:N′]bis(μ₃‐4,4′‐oxydibenzoato)‐κ³O:O′:O′′;κ⁴O:O′,O′′:O′‐dicopper(II)], [Cu₂(C₁₄H₈O₅)₂(C₁₄H₁₀N₄S₂)(H₂O)]_n or [Cu₂(bibp)(oba)₂(H₂O)]_n, (II), have been prepared through one‐pot concomitant crystallization and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) and thermogravimetric (TG) analysis. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction indicates that the most interesting aspect of the structure is the existence of sole trans and cis conformations of the bibp ligand in a single net of (I) and (II), respectively. Compound (I) displays a threefold interpenetrating three‐dimensional framework with a 4‐connected {6⁵.8} cds topology, whereas (II) features a one‐dimensional chain structure. In the crystal of (II), the polymeric chains are further extended through C—H…O hydrogen bonds and C—H…π interactions into a three‐dimensional supramolecular architecture. In addition, strong intramolecular O—H…O hydrogen bonds formed between the bridging water molecules and the carboxylate O atoms improve the stability of the framework of (II). Furthermore, solid‐state UV–Vis spectroscopy experiments show that compounds (I) and (II) exhibit optical band gaps which are characteristic for optical semiconductors, with values of 2.70 and 2.26 eV, respectively.     

Tuning of crystallization method and ligand conformation to give a mononuclear compound or two‐dimensional SCO coordination polymer based on a new semi‐rigid V‐shaped bis‐pyridyl bis‐amide ligand

With the new semi‐rigid V‐shaped bidentate pyridyl amide compound 5‐methyl‐N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)benzene‐1,3‐dicarboxamide (L) as an auxiliary ligand and the Fe^II ion as the metal centre, one mononuclear complex, bis(methanol‐κO)bis[5‐methyl‐N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)benzene‐1,3‐dicarboxamide‐κN]bis(thiocyanato‐κN)iron(II), [Fe(SCN)₂(C₁₉H₁₆N₄O₂)₂(CH₃OH)₂] ( 1 ), and one two‐dimensional coordination polymer, catena‐poly[[[bis(thiocyanato‐κN)iron(II)]‐bis[μ‐5‐methyl‐N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)benzene‐1,3‐dicarboxamide‐κ²N:N′]] methanol disolvate dihydrate], {[Fe(SCN)₂(C₁₉H₁₆N₄O₂)₂]·2CH₃OH·2H₂O}_n ( 2 ), were prepared by slow evaporation and H‐tube diffusion methods, respectively, indicating the effect of the method of crystallization on the structure type of the target product. Both complexes have been structurally characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography. The single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis shows that L functions as a monodentate ligand in mononuclear 1 , while it coordinates in a bidentate manner to two independent Fe(SCN)₂ units in complex 2 , with a different conformation from that in 1 and the ligands point in two almost orthogonal directions, therefore leading to a two‐dimensional grid‐like network. Investigation of the magnetic properties reveals the always high‐spin state of the Fe^II centre over the whole temperature range in 1 and a gradual thermally‐induced incomplete spin crossover (SCO) behaviour below 150 K in 2 , demonstrating the influence of the different coordination fields on the spin properties of the metal ions. The current results provide useful information for the rational design of functional complexes with different structure dimensionalities by employing different conformations of the ligand and different crystallization methods.     

[N,N′‐Bis­(salicyl­idene)‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diaminato]­nickel(II) and [N,N′‐bis­(salicyl­idene)‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diaminato]copper(II)

In the title compounds, {2,2′‐[2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diyl­bis­(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]­diphenolato‐κ⁴N,N′,O,O′}nickel(II), [Ni(C₁₉H₂₀N₂O₂)], and {2,2′‐[2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diyl­bis­(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]­diphenolato‐κ⁴N,N′,O,O′}copper(II), [Cu(C₁₉H₂₀N₂O₂)], the Ni^II and Cu^II atoms are coordinated by two iminic N and two phenolic O atoms of the N,N′‐bis­(salicyl­idene)‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diaminate (SALPD^2?, C₁₇H₁₆N₂O₂^2?) ligand. The geometry of the coordination sphere is planar in the case of the Ni^II complex and distorted towards tetrahedral for the Cu^II complex. Both complexes have a cis configuration imposed by the chelate ligand. The dihedral angles between the N/Ni/O and N/Cu/O coordination planes are 17.20 (6) and 35.13 (7)°, respectively.     

Structural characterization of a hybrid terpyridine–pyrazine ligand and its one‐dimensional ZnII coordination polymer: a computational approach to conventional and nonconventional intermolecular interactions

The structures of a new hybrid terpyridine–pyrazine ligand, namely 4′‐[4‐(pyrazin‐2‐yl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine (L2), C₂₅H₁₇N₅, and its one‐dimensional coordination polymer catena‐poly[[bis(acetylacetonato‐κ²O,O′)zinc]‐μ‐4′‐[4‐(pyrazin‐2‐yl‐κN⁴)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine‐κN¹], [Zn(C₅H₇O₂)₂(C₂₅H₁₇N₅)]_n or [Zn(acac)₂(L2)]_n (Hacac is acetylacetone), are reported. Packing interactions in both crystal structures are analyzed using Hirshfeld surface and enrichment ratio techniques. For the simpler structure of the monomeric ligand, further studies on the interaction hierarchy using the energy framework approach were made. The result was a complete picture of the intermolecular interaction landscape, which revealed some subtle details, for example, that some weak (at first sight negligible) C—H…N interactions in the structure of free L2 play a relevant role in the crystal stabilization.     

Controllable assembly of a three‐dimensional metal–organic supramolecular framework displaying hydrogen‐bonding and π–π stacking interactions

The complex poly[[aqua(μ₂‐phthalato‐κ²O¹:O²){μ₃‐2‐[3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl]acetato‐κ⁴N²,N³:O:O′}{μ₂‐2‐[3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl]acetato‐κ³N²,N³:O}dizinc(II)] dihydrate], {[Zn₂(C₁₀H₈N₃O₂)₂(C₈H₄O₄)(H₂O)]·2H₂O}_n, has been prepared by solvothermal reaction of 2‐[3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl]acetonitrile (PPAN) with zinc(II). Under hydrothermal conditions, PPAN is hydrolyzed to 2‐[3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl]acetate (PPAA⁻). The structure determination reveals that the complex is a one‐dimensional double chain containing cationic [Zn₄(PPAA)₄]⁴⁺ structural units, which are further extended by bridging phthalate ligands. The one‐dimensional chains are extended into a three‐dimensional supramolecular architecture via hydrogen‐bonding and π–π stacking interactions.     

Coordination of a triazine ligand with CuII and AgI investigated by spectral,structural, theoretical and docking studies

Two complexes of 5‐phenyl‐3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazine (PPTA), namely (ethanol‐κO)bis(nitrato‐κO)[5‐phenyl‐3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl‐κN)‐1,2,4‐triazine‐κN²]copper(II), [Cu(NO₃)₂(C₁₄H₁₀N₄)(C₂H₆O)] or [Cu(NO₃)₂(PPTA)(EtOH)] ( 1 ), and bis[μ‐5‐phenyl‐3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazine]‐κ³N¹:N²,N³;κ³N²,N³:N¹‐bis[(nitrato‐κO)silver(I)], [Ag₂(NO₃)₂(C₁₄H₁₀N₄)₂] or [Ag₂(NO₃)₂(μ‐PPTA)₂] ( 2 ), were prepared and characterized by elemental analysis, FT–IR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The X‐ray structure analysis of 1 revealed a copper complex with square‐pyramdial geometry containing two O‐donor nitrate ligands along with an N,N′‐donor PPTA ligand and one O‐donor ethanol ligand. In the binuclear structure of 2 , formed by the bridging of two PPTA ligands, each Ag atom has an AgN₃O environment and square‐planar geometry. In addition to the four dative interactions, each Ag atom interacts with two O atoms of two nitrate ligands on adjacent complexes to complete a pseudo‐octahedral geometry. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations revealed that the geometry around the Cu and Ag atoms in 1 ^opt and 2 ^opt (opt is optimized) for an isolated molecule is the same as the experimental results. In 1 , O—H…O hydrogen bonds form R₁²(4) motifs. In the crystal network of the complexes, in addition to the hydrogen bonds, there are π–π stacking interactions between the aromatic rings (phenyl, pyridine and triazine) of the ligands on adjacent complexes. The ability of the ligand and complexes 1 and 2 to interact with ten selected biomacromolecules (BRAF kinase, CatB, DNA gyrase, HDAC7, rHA, RNR, TrxR, TS, Top II and B‐DNA) was investigated by docking studies. The results show that the studied compounds can interact with proteins better than doxorubicin (except for TrxR and Top II).