FeIII in a low‐spin state in caesium bis[3‐ethoxysalicylaldehyde 4‐methylthiosemicarbazonato(2–)‐κ3O2,N1,S]ferrate(III) methanol monosolvate

The synthesis and crystal structure (at 100 K) of the title compound, Cs[Fe(C₁₁H₁₃N₃O₂S₂)₂]·CH₃OH, is reported. The asymmetric unit consists of an octahedral [Fe^III(L)₂]⁻ fragment, where L²⁻ is 3‐ethoxysalicylaldehyde 4‐methylthiosemicarbazonate(2−) {systematic name: [2‐(3‐ethoxy‐2‐oxidobenzylidene)hydrazin‐1‐ylidene](methylamino)methanethiolate}, a caesium cation and a methanol solvent molecule. Each L²⁻ ligand binds through the thiolate S, the imine N and the phenolate O atoms as donors, resulting in an Fe^IIIS₂N₂O₂ chromophore. The O,N,S‐coordinating ligands are orientated in two perpendicular planes, with the O and S atoms in cis positions and the N atoms in trans positions. The Fe^III cation is in the low‐spin state at 100 K.     

A novel crystal structure of {tris[4‐(1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl‐κN2)‐3‐azabut‐3‐enyl]amine‐κN}iron(II) bis(tetrafluoridoborate) methanol monosolvate featuring a low‐spin configuration

Mononuclear complexes are good model systems for evaluating the effects of different ligand systems on the magnetic properties of iron(II) centres. A novel crystal structure of the title compound, [Fe(C₁₈H₂₄N₁₀)](BF₄)₂·CH₃OH, with one molecule of methanol per formula unit exhibits a strictly sixfold coordination sphere associated with a low‐spin configuration at the metal centre. The incorporated methanol solvent molecule promotes extended hydrogen‐bonding networks between the tetrafluoridoborate anions and the cationic units. A less constrained crystal structure regarding close contacts between the tetrafluoridoborate anions and the cationic units allows a spin transition which is inhibited in the previously published hydrate of the title compound.     

Decoupled Spin Crossover and Structural Phase Transition in a Molecular Iron(II) Complex

Crystalline [Fe(bppSMe)₂][BF₄]₂ ( 1 ; bppSMe=4‐(methylsulfanyl)‐2,6‐di(pyrazol‐1‐yl)pyridine) undergoes an abrupt spin‐crossover (SCO) event at 265±5 K. The crystals also undergo a separate phase transition near 205 K, involving a contraction of the unit‐cell a axis to one‐third of its original value (high‐temperature phase 1; Pbcn, Z=12; low‐temperature phase 2; Pbcn, Z=4). The SCO‐active phase 1 contains two unique molecular environments, one of which appears to undergo SCO more gradually than the other. In contrast, powder samples of 1 retain phase 1 between 140–300 K, although their SCO behaviour is essentially identical to the single crystals. The compounds [Fe(bppBr)₂][BF₄]₂ ( 2 ; bppBr=4‐bromo‐2,6‐di(pyrazol‐1‐yl)pyridine) and [Fe(bppI)₂][BF₄]₂ ( 3 ; bppI=4‐iodo‐2,6‐di(pyrazol‐1‐yl)‐pyridine) exhibit more gradual SCO near room temperature, and adopt phase 2 in both spin states. Comparison of 1 – 3 reveals that the more cooperative spin transition in 1 , and its separate crystallographic phase transition, can both be attributed to an intermolecular steric interaction involving the methylsulfanyl substituents. All three compounds exhibit the light‐induced excited‐spin‐state trapping (LIESST) effect with T(LIESST=70–80 K), but show complicated LIESST relaxation kinetics involving both weakly cooperative (exponential) and strongly cooperative (sigmoidal) components.     

The first three‐dimensional FeIII–SrII heterometallic coordination polymer: poly[[diaquatetrakis(μ3‐pyridine‐2,3‐dicarboxylato)diiron(III)strontium(II)] dihydrate]

The title compound, poly[[diaqua‐1κ²O‐tetrakis(μ₃‐pyridine‐2,3‐dicarboxylato)‐2:1:2′κ¹⁰N,O²:O^2′,O³:O^3′;2:1:2′κ⁸O³:O^3′:N,O²‐diiron(III)strontium(II)] dihydrate], {[Fe₂Sr(C₇H₃O₄)₄(H₂O)₂]·2H₂O}_n, which has triclinic (P) symmetry, was prepared by the reaction of pyridine‐2,3‐dicarboxylic acid, SrCl₂·6H₂O and Fe(OAc)₂(OH) (OAc is acetate) in the presence of imidazole in water at 363 K. In the crystal structure, the pyridine‐2,3‐dicarboxylate (pydc²⁻) ligand exhibits μ₃‐η¹,η¹:η¹:η¹ and μ₃‐η¹,η¹:η¹,η¹:η¹ coordination modes, bridging two Fe^III cations and one Sr^II cation. The Sr^II cation, which is located on an inversion centre, is eight‐coordinated by six O atoms of four pydc²⁻ ligands and two water molecules. The coordination geometry of the Sr^II cation can be best described as distorted dodecahedral. The Fe^III cation is six‐coordinated by O and N atoms of four pydc²⁻ ligands in a slightly distorted octahedral geometry. Each Fe^III cation bridges two neighbouring Fe^III cations to form a one‐dimensional [Fe₂(pydc)₄]_n chain. The chains are connected by Sr^II cations to form a three‐dimensional framework. The topology type of this framework is tfj . The structure displays O—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonding.     

Structure and Electronic Configuration of an Iron(II) Complex in a LIESST State: A Pump and Probe Method

Switchable molecules : The electronic configurations of the Fe center in trans‐[Fe(tzpy)₂(NCS)₂] in low‐spin, high‐spin, and LIESST states (LIESST=light‐induced excited spin‐state trapping) were confirmed by K‐ and L‐edge X‐ray absorption and magnetic measurements. The molecular structures at 40 K before and after irradiation are superimposed in the picture, which demonstrates a single‐crystal‐to‐single‐crystal transition by irradiation.

     

Crystal structure of Pb<Subscript>2</Subscript>[Fe(CN)<Subscript>6</Subscript>]NO<Superscript>3</Superscript>·5.5H<Subscript>2</Subscript>O

Synthesis of a mixed complex compound Pb₂[Fe(CN)₆]NO₃·5.5H₂O is described. The results of its X-ray structural investigation are presented. Crystal data: C₆H₁₁FeN₇O_8.50Pb₂: a = 7.2582(6) Å, b = 21.838(3) Å, c = 11.612(1) Å; β = 107.91(1)°, V = 1751.4(3) ų, Z = 4, d_calc = 2.986 g/cm³, space group P2₁/m, R = 0.038. The compound has a framework polymer structure.     

Crystallographic report: Bis(acetato‐O,O′){4‐[N,N‐bis(2‐cyanoethyl)amino] pyridine}bis(methanol)cadmium(II), [Cd(C11H12N4) (CH3CO2)2(CH3OH)2]

The cadmium atom is coordinated in distorted pentagonal bipyramidal geometry by the pyridine‐nitrogen atom of the 4‐[N,N‐bis(2‐cyanoethyl)amino]pyridine ligand, two oxygen atoms of two methanol molecules and four oxygen atoms of two acetate groups. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

High-spin- and low-spin-state structures of [Fe(chloroethyltetrazole)6](ClO4)2 from synchrotron powder diffraction data

The spin-crossover complex [Fe(teec)(6)](ClO(4))(2) (teec = chloroethyltetrazole) exhibits a 50 % incomplete spin crossover in the temperature range 300-30 K. Time-resolved synchrotron powder diffraction experiments have been carried out to elucidate its structural behavior. We report crystal structure models of this material at 300 K (high spin) and 90 K (low spin), as solved from synchrotron powder diffraction data by using Genetic Algorithm and Parallel Tempering techniques and refined with Rietveld refinement. During short synchrotron powder diffraction experiments (five minutes duration) two distinguishable lattices were observed the quantities of which vary with temperature. The implication of this phenomenon, that is interpreted as a structural phase transition associated with the high-to-low spin crossover, and the structural characteristics of the high-spin and low-spin models are discussed in relation to other compounds showing a similar type of spin-crossover behavior.     

Cover Picture: Photo‐Induced Spin Transition of Iron(III) Compounds with π–π Intermolecular Interactions (Chem. Eur. J. 14/2009)

Introduction of strong intermolecular interactions leads to the observation of the LIESST effect even for iron(III) spin‐crossover (SCO) compounds. For LIESST iron(III) compounds, both stretching and bending modes are considered in the reaction coordinate diagram. The picture depicts the LIESST mechanism in the reaction coordinate diagram considering both stretching and bending modes for SCO iron(III) compounds. For more information see the Full Paper by S. Hayami, O. Sato et al. on page 3497 ff.

     

Low-spin state structure of [Fe(chloroethyltetrazole)6](BF4)2 obtained from synchrotron powder diffraction data

The complex [Fe(teec)6](BF4)2 (teec = chloroethyltetrazole) shows a two-step complete spin-crossover transition in the temperature range 300-90 K. Time-resolved synchrotron powder diffraction experiments have been carried out in this temperature range, and crystal structure models have been obtained from the powder patterns by using the parallel tempering technique. Of these models, the low-spin state structure at 90 K has been refined completely with Rietveld refinement. Its structural characteristics are discussed in relation to the high-spin state model and other spin-crossover compounds. The complex shows a remarkable anisotropic unit-cell parameter contraction that is dependent on the applied cooling rate. In addition, the possible important implications for the interpretation of spin-crossover behavior in terms of structural changes are discussed.     

Tetraphenylphosphonium-tetradecachlorotetraarsenat(III), (PPh4)2As4Cl14

Tetraphenylphosphonium Tetradecachlorotetraarsenate(III), (PPh₄)₂As₄Cl₁₄ The title compound was obtained by reaction of As₄S₄, PPh₄Cl and chlorine in dichloromethane. According to its X-ray crystal structure analysis, the As₄Cl ion can be described as an association product of two AsCl₄^? units and two AsCl₃ molecules. The As atoms and ten Cl atoms are approximately in a plane, the remaining four Cl atoms alternately take positions above and below this plane. The As atoms have distorted ψ octahedral coordination.