Comparison between sample disruption methods and solid-liquid extraction (SLE) to extract phenolic compounds from Ficus carica leaves

Sea sand disruption method (SSDM) and matrix solid phase disruption (MSPD) were compared to solid-liquid extraction (SLE) for extraction of phenolic compounds from the Ficus carica leaves. Statistical treatment, ANOVA-single factor, was used to compare the extraction yields obtained by these methods, and for the majority of the extracted compounds, significantly higher yields were obtained by the solid disruption methods. Both solid disruption methods are faster and ecologically friendly, but the sea sand method was more reproducible (RSD < 5% for most compounds), and was also the least expensive method. Recoveries above 85% were obtained for chlorogenic acid, rutin, and psoralen using the sea sand extraction method.     

Novel methods to extract flavanones and xanthones from the root bark of Maclura pomifera

A comparison between the extraction yields of xanthones and flavanones from the root bark of the Maclura pomifera by solid-liquid extraction (SLE), matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD), and an alternative method using sea sand as a sample disruptor, is presented here. Two extraction solvents were used for all extraction techniques, dichloromethane and methanol:water, (9:1, v/v). The extraction procedures were reproducible as the R.S.D. values were less than 5% for almost all compounds. A recovery above 80% was obtained for macluraxanthone using the sea sand extraction procedure. Statistical treatment, ANOVA-single factor, was used to evaluate the different extraction procedures, and homogenization of plant material with sand followed by elution with dichloromethane provided the most efficient and rapid extraction method.     

固相萃取法与基质固相分散法在橙子中有机磷农药残留分析中的应用

建立了固相萃取(SPE)-反相高效液相色谱(RP-HPLC)同时测定橙子中痕量辛硫磷、二嗪农有机磷农药残留量的方法。样品经甲醇超声提取、C18固相萃取柱净化后,采用液相色谱柱分离,以乙腈-水(体积比为85∶15)为流动相等度洗脱,于254 nm下紫外检测。结果表明:在0.1～10.0 mg/L和0.4～10.0 mg/L范围内,辛硫磷、二嗪农的质量浓度与峰面积呈良好的线性关系;样品的加标平均回收率为87.3%～102.7%,相对标准偏差(RSD)为0.9%～4.9%。将该分析结果与用基质固相分散法(MSPD)处理样品所得的结果相比较,发现SPE对二嗪农的提取效果较好,而MSPD对辛硫磷的提取效果较好,但两种方法都能较好地净化样品,均能满足残留量的分析要求。     

基质固相分散法与固相萃取法在检测水产品中己烯雌酚残留中的应用

分别建立了基质固相分散（MSPD）法、固相萃取（SPE）法与气相色谱/质谱联用（GC-MS）测定水产品中己烯雌酚（DES）残留量的分析方法,并对MSPD与SPE 2种样品前处理方法的效果进行了比较。MSPD法中样品以弗罗里硅土（Florisil）作为固相分散剂,经乙酸乙酯提取,再用Florisil净化;SPE法中样品经乙酸乙酯超声提取,过Florisil小柱进行净化,最后经GC-MS在选择离子监测模式下测定水产品中DES。在优化的色谱条件下,方法的线性范围为1-300 μg/L,相关系数为0.9985。M     

Matrix solid-phase dispersion extraction of carbadox and olaquindox in feed followed by hydrophilic interaction ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatographic analysis

A new method involving matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) extraction and hydrophilic interaction ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography (HILIC-UHPLC) with photodiode array detection was developed for the determination of carbadox and olaquindox in feed. Separation of carbadox and olaquindox was achieved within 1 min on the 1.7 microm Acquity UPLC BEH HILIC column by using isocratic elution with a mobile phase consisting of 10 mmol L(-1) ammonium acetate in acetonitrile-water (95:5, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min(-1). Optimization of MSPD extraction parameters, such as type of solid sorbent and elution solvent were carried out. Optimal conditions selected for MSPD extraction were: 0.25 g of feed sample, 0.5 g of octadecylsilica as solid sorbent and 10 mL of acetonitrile-methanol (8:2, v/v) as eluting solvent. Both analytes provided average recoveries from spiked feed samples ranging from 89.1 to 98.4% with relative standard deviations less than 10%. Obtained performance characteristics are comparable to those achieved by liquid-liquid extraction-HPLC with the advantages of being simpler and significantly faster.     

Determination of phenolic compounds in wines by novel matrix solid-phase dispersion extraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

A novel matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) extraction method was developed to extract simultaneously 23 phenolic compounds from wine samples prior to determination by gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection in the selected ion monitoring mode. Different parameters of the MSPD technique such as dispersant solid-phase, eluting solvent, and sample ionic strength and pH were optimized. The optimized MSPD procedure requires a small volume of wine (1 mL), commercial silica gel (1.5 g) as dispersant solid-phase and a small volume of ethyl acetate (5 mL) as eluting solvent. Under these conditions, the extraction of the studied compounds was almost complete (mean values of recoveries between 87 and 109%) in a short time (15 min). Moreover, satisfactory standard deviations of repeatability (RSD<9% in most cases), linear regression coefficients (r(2)>0.993) and detection limits (<8 microg/L) confirm the usefulness of the methodology for routine monitoring of the concentration of individual phenolic antioxidants in wines. Application was illustrated by analysis of different wine samples.     

Matrix solid-phase dispersion extraction versus solid-phase extraction in the analysis of combined residues of hexachlorocyclohexane isomers in plant matrices

This paper describes a method based on matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) to determine the presence of combined residues of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) isomers (alpha-, beta-, gamma- and delta-) in various plant matrices including vegetables, fruits, leaves, grains and roots, by gas chromatography with (63)Ni electron-capture detection. The MSPD method consists of sample homogenization, cellular disruption, exhaustive extraction, fractionation and clean up by simple processes in which a small amount of sample (5 g) was blended with Florisil and the mixture passed into a small chromatographic column and eluted with 10 ml of n-hexane-ethyl acetate solvent mixture (70:30; v/v) and repeated with another 10 ml of the same solvent mixture. A comparison with classical solid-phase extraction (SPE) showed MSPD to be efficient, fast, simple and easy to perform. The detection limit of various HCH isomers was found to be in the range of 2.15-5.68 ng and method detection limit varied from 0.465 to 1.136 ng g(-1). Mean recoveries were found in the range of 91-98%. Till date, there are no official methods or standards by Central Pollution Control Board or Bureau of Indian standards that take into account India's real life conditions in the analysis of pesticide residues in plant matrices and the MSPD method described herein has proved to be a feasible one for the analysis of combined residues of HCH isomers in various plant materials.     

Application of matrix solid-phase dispersion to the propham and maleic hydrazide determination in potatoes by differential pulse voltammetry and HPLC

The application of the matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) process as sample treatment in connection with the electrochemical detection is studied for the first time. For this purpose, a novel methodology is introduced for the extraction of propham and maleic hydrazide herbicides from potatoes samples based in the MSPD process prior to their electrochemical detection. Potato samples disruption was done by blending them with C₈ bonded-phase and selective herbicide extraction was achieved by successive treatment of the blended with 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.4 (for maleic hydrazide) and methanol (for propham). The extraction procedure efficiency was estimated using differential pulse voltammetry in potato samples spiked with the herbicides yielding recovery values of 98% and 68% for propham and maleic hydrazide, respectively. No significant adverse effect of the MSPD process was observed on the herbicides electrochemical signals. For comparison, recovery studies using HPLC with UV detection were carried out and a good correlation in the results obtained by using both techniques was observed.     

Development of a matrix solid-phase dispersion method for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sewage sludge samples

A new, single-step extraction and purification method based on matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) was developed to determine 17 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sewage sludge samples. The MSPD method consists of sample homogenisation, exhaustive extraction and clean-up by a single process. The different operational parameters of the method, such as the type of dispersant, type and amount of additives, clean-up co-sorbent and extractive solvent were evaluated. Reversed-phase (C18) and polymeric (Oasis HLB and Oasis MAX) materials, as well as normal phase sorbents (Florisil, silica, neutral alumina) and an inert support (sand) were tested to assess the sorbents effect on the yield and selectivity of the MSPD process. Analysis of extracts was performed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with fluorescence detection.Quantification limits obtained for all of these considered compounds (between 0.0001 and 0.005 μg g⁻¹ dry mass) were well below of the limits recommended in the EU. The extraction yields for the different compounds obtained by MSPD ranged from 76.3% to 103.6%. On the other hand, the extraction efficiency of the optimised method is compared with that achieved by microwave-assisted extraction and the method was applied to the analysis of real sewage sludge samples. A certified reference material (sewage sludge (BCR 088)) and a reference material (sewage sludge (RTC-CNS312-04)) were used to validate the proposed method.     

Carbon molecular sieve based micro‐matrix‐solid‐phase dispersion for the extraction of polyphenols in pomegranate peel by UHPLC‐Q‐TOF/MS

A rapid, simple, and efficient sample extraction method based on micro‐matrix‐solid‐phase dispersion (micro‐MSPD) was applied to the extraction of polyphenols from pomegranate peel. Five target analytes were determined by ultra‐HPLC coupled with Q‐TOF/MS. Carbon molecular sieve (CMS) was firstly used as dispersant to improve extraction efficiency in micro‐MSPD. The major micro‐MSPD parameters, such as type of dispersant, amount of dispersant, grinding time, and the type and the volume of elution solvents, were studied and optimized. Under optimized conditions, 26 mg of pomegranate peel was dispersed with 32.5 mg of CMS, the grinding time was selected as 90 s, the dispersed sample was eluted with 100 μL of methanol. Results showed that the proposed method was of good linearity for concentrations of analytes against their peak areas (coefficient of determination r² > 0.990), the LOD was as low as 3.2 ng/mL, and the spiking recoveries were between 88.1 and 106%. Satisfactory results were obtained for the extraction of gallic acid, punicalagin A, punicalagin B, catechin, and ellagic acid from pomegranate peel sample, which demonstrated nice reliability and high sensitivity of this approach.     

Optimization of the matrix solid-phase dispersion sample preparation procedure for analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils: comparison with microwave-assisted extraction

A fast and simple preparation procedure based on the matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) technique is proposed for the first time for the isolation of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from soil samples. Naphthalene, acenaphthene, fluorene, phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, benz[a]anthracene, chrysene, benzo[e]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene, dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, benzo[g,h,i]perylene, and indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene were considered in the study. Extraction and clean-up of samples were carried out in a single step. The main parameters that affect extraction yield, such as dispersant, type and amount of additives, clean-up co-sorbent and extractive solvent were evaluated and optimized. The addition of an alkali solution in MSPD was required to provide quantitative recoveries. Analytical determinations were carried out by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection. Quantification limits (between 0.01 and 0.6 ng g(-1) dry mass) were well below the regulatory limits for all the compounds considered. The extraction yields for the different compounds obtained by MSPD were compared with the yields obtained by microwave-assisted extraction (MAE). To test the accuracy of the MSPD technique, the optimized methodology was applied to the analysis of standard reference material BCR-524 (contaminated industrial soil), with excellent results.     

Response surface optimization for determination of pesticide multiresidues by matrix solid-phase dispersion and gas chromatography

An optimized multiresidue analysis method based on matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) and gas chromatography (GC) is proposed for the determination of organochlorines and pyrethroids in the tea samples. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize the extraction conditions of MSPD, such as the sorbent type, eluent composition, dichloromethane concentration and eluting volume. Desirability function approach was employed to optimize the pesticide recoveries and matrix cleanup. Compromising the recoveries and cleanup degree, MSPD was carried out with Florisil as the sorbent and n-hexane-dichloromethane (1:1, v/v) as the eluent. The pesticide recoveries in tea samples were better than 80% spiked in the concentration range of 0.01-0.05mg/kg and the relative standard deviations were lower than 7%. The quantification limits of the pesticides were in the range of 0.002-0.06mg/kg, which were lower than the maximum residue limits of the pesticides in tea samples established by the European Union.     

Determination of parabens and endocrine-disrupting alkylphenols in soil by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry following matrix solid-phase dispersion or in-column microwave-assisted extraction: a comparative study

Two rapid methods were evaluated for the simultaneous extraction of seven parabens and two alkylphenols from soil based on matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE). Soil extracts were derivatized with N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide and analyzed by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry. Extraction and clean-up of samples were carried out by both methods in a single step. A glass sample holder, inside the microwave cell, was used in MAE to allow the simultaneous extraction and clean-up of samples and shorten the MAE procedure. The detection limits achieved by MSPD were lower than those obtained by MAE because the presence of matrix interferences increased with this extraction method. The extraction yields obtained by MSPD and MAE for three different types of soils were compared. Both procedures showed good recoveries and sensitivity for the determination of parabens and alkylphenols in two of the soils assayed, however, only MSPD yielded good recoveries with the other soil. Finally, MSPD was applied to the analysis of soils collected in different sites of Spain. In most of the samples analyzed, methylparaben and butylparaben were detected at levels ranging from 1.21 to 8.04 ng g⁻¹ dry weight and 0.48 to 1.02 ng g⁻¹ dry weight, respectively.     

Simultaneous determination of nucleosides and their bases in Cordyceps sinensis and its substitutes by matrix solid‐phase dispersion extraction and HPLC

Nine nucleosides and nucleobases, including uracil, adenine, thymine, uridine, adenosine, thymidine, cytidine, guanosine, and cordycepin in natural Cordyceps sinensis, cultured Cordyceps mycelia, and Cordyceps fruiting bodies were extracted by matrix solid‐phase dispersion (MSPD) and determined by HPLC. The experimental conditions for the MSPD extraction were optimized. Florisil was used as dispersant, petroleum ether as washing solvent, and methanol as elution solvent. The Florisil‐to‐sample ratio was selected to be 4:1 and no additional clean‐up sorbent was needed. The calibration curves had good linear relationships (r > 0.9997). The LOD and LOQ were in the range of 12 ～ 79 and 41 ～ 265 ng/mL, respectively. The intra‐ and interday precision were lower than 8.3%. The recoveries were between 61.5 and 93.2%. The present method consumed less sample compared with ultrasonic extraction and heating reflux extraction (HRE). The extraction yields obtained by using the present method are much higher than those obtained by UE and comparable to those obtained by HRE.     

Determination and identification of isoflavonoids in Radix astragali by matrix solid-phase dispersion extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array and mass spectrometric detection

The isoflavonoids in Radix astragali were determined and identified by HPLC-photodiode array detection-MS after extraction employing matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD). As a new sample preparation method for R. astragali, the MSPD procedure was optimized, validated and compared with conventional methods including ultrasonic and Soxhlet extraction. The amounts of two major components in this herb, formononetin (6) and ononin (2), were determined based on their authentic standards. Four major isoflavonoids, formononetin (6), ononin (2), calycosin (5) and its glycoside (1), and three minor isoflavonoids, (6aR,11aR)-3-hydroxy-9, 10-dimethoxypterocarpan (7), its glycoside (3), and (3R)-7,2'-dihydroxy-3',4'-dimethoxyisoflavone-7-O-beta-D-glycoside (4), were identified based on their characteristic two-band UV spectra and [M + H], [aglycone + H]+ and [A1 + H]+ ions, etc. The combined MSPD and HPLC-DAD-MS method was suitable for quantitative and qualitative determination of the isoflavonoids in R. astragali.     

Optimization of a matrix solid-phase dispersion method with subsequent clean-up for the determination of ethylene bisdithiocarbamate residues in almond samples

A matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) method with subsequent clean-up has been developed to isolate the ethylene bisdithiocarbamate (EBDC) main metabolites (ethylenethiourea, ETU, and ethylenebis [isothiocyanate] sulphide, EBIS) in almond samples. The optimized experimental set-up configuration involved 0.2 g of almond sample, washed sand as MSPD support and NaOH as defatting agent. A subsequent purification step on alumina using acetonitrile as extraction solvent was enough to remove all interferent matrix components, including the fatty material, and provide clean extracts. Quantitative analysis was performed by reversed phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) with diode-array ultraviolet absorbance (DAD UV) detector. Analytes recoveries were between 76 and 85% with relative standard deviations ranging from 3 to 12%. The low limits of quantification of 0.05 and 0.07 mg kg(-1) achieved for ETU and EBIS, respectively, make the method useful for the determination of EBDC residues on almond samples.     

Separation and purification of furanocoumarins from Toddalia asiatica (L.) Lam. using microwave-assisted extraction coupled with high-speed counter-current chromatography

A method of microwave-assisted extraction coupled with high-speed counter-current chromatography was established for separation and purification of isopimpinellin, pimpinellin and phellopterin from Toddalia asiatica (L.) Lam. The conditions of MAE including the extraction solvent, size of sample, solid/liquid ratio, extraction temperature and extraction time were optimized by a mono-factor test. That is, 2.0 g dried powder of T. asiatica (L.) Lam of 0.30-0.15 mm size was extracted with 20 mL (solid/liquid ratio of 1:10, g/mL) methanol under 50 °C for 1 min. The crude extract was separated and purified by high-speed counter-current chromatography with hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-water (5:5:5.5:4.5, v/v/v/v) solvent system. 0.85 mg/g of isopimpinellin, 2.55 mg/g of pimpinellin and 0.95 mg/g of phellopterin were obtained from original sample in one-step within 240 min, the purity determined by high performance liquid chromatography was 95.0%, 99.1% and 96.4%, respectively. Their chemical structures were further identified by mass spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The results demonstrated that microwave-assisted extraction coupled with high-speed counter-current chromatography was a feasible, economical and efficient technique for rapid extraction, separation and purification of effective compounds from natural products.     

Routine application using single quadrupole liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to pesticides analysis in citrus fruits

A rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry method has been developed for the routine analysis of buprofezin, bupirimate, hexaflumuron, tebufenpyrad, fluvalinate and pyriproxyfen in citrus fruits. Extracts were obtained by matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) using C18 as dispersant and dichloromethane-methanol (80:20, v/v) as eluent. Matrix effects were tested for all matrices by addition of standard to sample blank extracts (samples containing no detectable residues). Mean recoveries obtained at fortification levels between 0.01 and 5 mg kg(-1) were 57-97% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) from 5 to 19%. The limits of quantification (LOQ) were in the range of 0.01-0.2 mg kg(-1) and lower than maximum residue limits (MRLs) established by the Spanish legislation. The MSPD was compared with conventional ethyl acetate extraction, showing equivalent recoveries and precision. Although the sample is more concentrated (5-fold) by solid-liquid extraction (SLE) with ethyl acetate than by MSPD, LOQs obtained by both techniques, were almost equal, because MSPD reduces matrix effects, baseline noise, and interfering peaks from the matrix. The proposed method has been applied to the determination of selected pesticides in real samples. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) with quadrupole ion trap (QIT) and triple quadrupole (TQ) have been used as confirmatory tool for positive samples according to a recent No. SANCO/10476/2003 European Union Guideline.     

Development of a matrix solid-phase dispersion method for the simultaneous determination of pyrethroid and organochlorinated pesticides in cattle feed

A matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) method was developed for the simultaneous extraction of 36 common pesticides and breakdown products (mostly pyrethroids and organochlorines) in cattle feed. Different parameters affecting the extraction efficiency (such as dispersing phase, clean-up adsorbent and elution volume) were investigated. The experimental procedure was optimized using a multivariate statistical approach and the final analyses were carried out by GC-muECD. Several protocols for extract purification were also studied. As far as we know, this is the first application of MSPD for the extraction of most of the target pesticides from animal feed. Using the optimized extraction conditions, the method was validated in terms of accuracy, and precision (within-a-day and among-days), using a certified reference material (CRM 115) as well as spiked cattle feedingstuffs at different concentration levels. A matrix effect study was also carried out using various real samples. The recoveries were satisfactory (>75% in most cases) and the quantification limits, at the sub-ngg(-1) or low-ngg(-1) level, complied with the regulated maximum residue levels (MRLs) in animal feed and in main crops used in the preparation of cattle feeding materials. Finally, the MSPD-GC-muECD methodology was applied to the analysis of real cattle feed samples collected in farms of dairy cattle from NW Spain.     

Optimization of a solid-phase microextraction procedure for the determination of herbicides by micellar electrokinetic chromatography

The use of a different optimization procedure that involves Experimental Design (ED) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) for the off-line coupling solid-phase microextraction-micellar electokinetic chomatography (SPME-MEKC) is presented. This combination of ED and ANN, mathematical tools not previously used in SPME-MEKC optimization, allowed us to obtain good extraction efficiencies in the SPME procedure for the determination of a group of eleven triazine herbicides in groundwater samples. Both extraction and desorption steps were carried out by solution stirring at 900 rpm. Optimal conditions for the off-line SPME procedure were: extraction with a poly(dimethylsiloxane)/divinylbenzene SPME fiber for 120 min, 10% (w/v) NaCl, desorption time 40 min, and 70% (v/v) of methanol/buffer as desorption mixture. Detection limits lay between 0.80 microg L(-1) and 4.89 microg L(-1). Finally, the optimized method was applied to the determination of these compounds in spiked and non-spiked groundwater samples using a previously optimized MEKC separation.