Rheological,thermal, and mechanical properties of poly(ethylene naphthalate)/poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends

Structural, Theological, thermal, and mechanical properties of blends of poly(ethylene naphthalate) (PEN) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) obtained by melt blending were investigated using capillary rheometry, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopic (SEM) observation, tensile testing. X-ray diffraction, and ¹H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements. The melt Theological behavior of the PEN/PET blends was very similar to that of the two parent polymers. The melt viscosity of the blends was between that of PEN and that of PET. Thermal properties and NMR measurement of the blends revealed that PEN is partially miscible with PET in the as molded blends, indicating that an interchange reaction occurs to some extent on melt processing. The blend of 50/50 PEN/PET was more difficult to crystallize compared with blends of other PEN/PET ratios. The blends, once melted during DSC measurements, almost never showed cold crystallization and subsequent melting and definitely exhibited a single glass transition temperature between those of PEN and PET during a reheating run. Improvement of the miscibility between PEN and PET with melting is mostly due to an increase in transesterification. The tensile modulus of the PEN/PET blend strands had a low value, reflecting amorphous structures of the blends, while tensile strength at the yield point increased linearly with increasing PEN content.     

BLENDS OF THERMOTROPIC LIQUID CRYSTALLINE POLYESTER AND POLY(ETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE)

Two kinds of blends of thermotropic liquid crystalline polymers (LCPs) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) were prepared by solution and melt blending, respectively. Crystallization behavior of the blends was observed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The LCP in both blends considerably decreased the cold crystallization temperature of PET and increased the crystallization rate in the low-temperature region, but did not show any significant effect on crystallization in the high-temperature region. Phase behavior of samples prepared by melt blending was investigated with the scanning electronic microscope (SEM). It was found that LCP/PET blends display a biphasic structure with an aromatic unit-rich phase as a dispersed domain, and a highly oriented fibrous structure was formed on the fracture surface of the blends. During the melt blending process, PET reacted with LCP through transesterification, as indicated by both DSC and SEM measurements.     

The Suppression of Isothermal Cold Crystallization in PET Through Nano‐Silica Incorporation

Isothermal crystallization from the glassy state of pure poly(ethylene terephthalate)(PET) and PET/Silica nanocomposites films was studied. The results showed that addition of nano‐silica increased the crystallinity of filled PET compared to pure PET, suggesting that nano‐silica is an effective nucleating agent. However, the induction period prior to crystallization was prolonged and the overall crystallization rate decreased through nano‐silica incorporation. This is a result of the cold crystallization rate being primarily controlled by diffusion of PET chains, rather than being controlled by the nucleation rate. The strong interaction between the nanoparticles and PET chains confined the movement of the macromolecular chains and decreased the cold crystallization rate.     

Confined crystallization in phase-separated poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene naphthalene 2,6-dicarboxilate) blends

The isothermal cold crystallization of poly(ethylene terephthalate)(PET) in cryogenic mechanical alloyed blends of PET and Poly(ethylene naphthalene 2,6-dicarboxilate)(PEN) 1:1 by weight has been investigated by simultaneous small and wide angle X-ray scattering (SAXS and WAXS) and dielectric spectroscopy (DS). For transesterification levels higher than 23% the blends tend to transform into a one-phase system and the crystallization of PET is strongly inhibited due to the significant reduction of the PET segment length. For lower levels of transesterification the blends are phase separated and the overall crystallization behaviour can be explained considering the confined nature of the PET domains in these blends. The formation of a rigid amorphous phase in the intra-lamellar stack amorphous regions is reduced in the blends due to a lower probability of stack formation in the confined PET-rich domains. The more effective filling of the space by the lamellar crystals in the blends provokes a stronger restriction to the amorphous phase mobility of PET in the blends than in pure PET.     

Nonisothermal Crystallization of Recycled Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate)/Poly(Ethylene Octene) Blends

Recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (r-PET) was blended with poly(ethylene octene) (POE) and glycidyl methacrylate grafted poly(ethylene octene) (mPOE). The nonisothermal crystallization behavior of r-PET, r-PET/POE, and r-PET/mPOE blends was investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The crystallization peak temperatures (T _p ) of the r-PET/POE and r-PET/mPOE blends were higher than that of r-PET at various cooling rates. Furthermore, the half-time for crystallization (t _1/2 ) decreased in the r-PET/POE and r-PET/mPOE blends, implying the nucleating role of POE and mPOE. The mPOE had lower nucleation activity than POE because the in situ formed copolymer PET-g-POE in the PET/mPOE blend restricted the movement of PET chains. Non-isothermal crystallization kinetics analysis was carried out based on the modified Avrami equation, the Ozawa equation, and the Mo method. It was found that the Mo method provided a better fit for the experimental data for all samples. The effective energy barriers for nonisothermal crystallization of r-PET and its blends were determined by the Kissinger method.     

Crystallization Behavior of Poly(Trimethylene Terephthalate)/Polycarbonate Blends

The crystallization behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate (PTT) in compatibilized and uncompatibilized PTT/polycarbonate (PC) blends are investigated in the research reported in this paper. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results showed that the crystallization behaviors of PTT/PC blends were very sensitive to PC content. The onset (T_ci) and the peak (T_c) crystallization temperatures shifted to lower temperatures whereas the area of the exotherm decreased quickly as the PC content was increased. The Avrami exponent, n, decreased from 4.32 to 3.61 as the PC content was increased from 0 to 20 wt %, and the growth rate constant, Z _c , decreased gradually as well. This suggests that the nucleation mechanism exhibits the tendency of changing gradually from a thermal nucleation to an athermal mode although the growth mechanism still remains three‐dimensional. When epoxy (2.7 phr) was added as a compatibilizer during melt blending, the T_ci and T_c shifted slightly to higher temperature (≤2°C), and the crystallization enthalpy, however, exhibited an increased crystallinity with the exception of the 90/10/2.7 phr PTT/PC/Epoxy. This suggests that the epoxy make a positive contribution to the PTT crystallization. Moreover, the influences of epoxy on the crystallization behaviors of PTT/PC blends are related to the epoxy content. By contrast, the compatibilizer of ethylene‐propylene‐diene copolymer graft glycidyl methacrylate (EPDM‐g‐GMA, ≤6.3 phr) had little effect on the crystallization behavior of PTT/PC blends. For PTT/PC/Epoxy (2.7 phr) blends, the Avrami exponent, n, decreased to near 3, while the growth rate constant, Z _c , increased slightly as PC content was increased from 0 to 20 wt %. It is suggested that epoxy accelerated the process of the nucleation mechanism changing from thermal nucleation to an athermal mode. The EPDM‐g‐GMA had little effect on the nucleation mode and spherical growth mechanism. The PTT spherulite morphologies in PTT/PC blends were very sensitive to blend composition. Completely different morphologies were observed in pure PTT, PTT/PC, PTT/PC/Epoxy, and PTT/PC/EPDM‐g‐GMA blends.     

Crystallization Behavior of Modified Polyester with Varied Macromolecular Architecture

Several modified polyesters with varied macromolecular architecture, such as branched poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) based on glycerol (GL) from 0.004 to 0.05 mol ratio as a branching agent, blocked and branched poly(butylene terephthalate)‐polyether containing poly(tetramethylene oxide) (PTMO) as soft segment and GL as a branching unit, as well as segmented poly(ethylene terephthalate)‐polyether,were prepared. Their crystallization behavior was studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD), and polarized optical microscopy (POM). It was found that a small extent of branching may enhance the crystallization of poly(ethylene terephthalate), while high degrees of branching (0.035–0.05) could block the development of crystallization. On the other hand, for even a small extent of incorporation of GL in the more flexible poly(butylene terephthalate)‐polyether chains, no enhanced crystallization was observed; blocking of crystallization from a branching defect may play the main role. The introduction of PTMO in poly(ethylene terephthalate) chains to a small degree facilitated the nucleation and speeded crystallization, but decreased the melting points of the polymers. A small number of nuclei and the greater induction time were found for branched PETs. The spherulities developed in branched PETs were larger and more perfect than those in PET due to less truncation of spherulites resulting from fewer nuclei, whereas the size of spherulities in poly(ethylene terephthalate)‐polyether became smaller with the increase of PTMO.     

Non‐isothermal Melt Crystallization Kinetics for Poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN)/Montmorillonite Nanocomposites Prepared by Melt Intercalation

The nonisothermal crystallization behaviors for poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN) and poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN)/montmorillonite nanocomposites prepared by melt intercalation were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The Jeziorny, Ozawa, Ziabicki, and Kissinger models were used to analyze the experimental data. Both the Jeziorny and the Ozawa models were found to describe the nonisothermal crystallization processes of PEN and PEN/montmorillonite nanocomposites fairly well. The results obtained from the Jeziorny and the Ozawa analysis show that the montmorillonite nanoparticles dispersed into PEN matrix act as heterogeneous nuclei for PEN and enhance its crystallization rate, accelerating the crystallization, but a high‐loading of montmorillonites restrain the crystal growth of PEN. The analysis results from the Ziabicki and the Kissinger models further verify the dual actions stated above of the montmorillonite nanoparticles in PEN matrix.     

Sequential Structure,Crystallization, and Properties of Biodegradable Poly(ethylene Terephthalate-Co-Ethylene Oxide-Co-Lactide) Copolyester

The sequential structure, isothermal crystallization, tensile property, and degradation behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate-co-ethylene oxide-co-lactide) (ETOLA) copolyester based on melt transesterification of poly(ethylene terephthalate) with poly(ethylene oxide) and oligo(lactic acid) was investigated. The degree of randomness was calculated to be 0.38, showing the incorporation of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) blocks into the homogeneous sequences of ethylene terephthalate (ET) and lactide (LA) units. The isothermal crystallization kinetics results revealed that the crystallization activation energy of the copolyester calculated using the Arrhenius’ equation was lower than that reported for poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), indicating that the addition of PEO and LA units into PET retarded the crystallization of PET. The copolyester exhibited the same crystal structure at different crystallization temperatures, similar to that of PET homopolymer, based on wide angle X-ray diffraction results. The size of the spherulites of ETOLA increased with crystallization temperature. The increase of crystallization temperature reduced the elongation at break of the copolyesters, as well as the enzymatic degradation.     

Crowding-Induced Crystallization of Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate)

Samples of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) extracted from three-component systems with different ratios among PET, phenol, and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) were prepared. As a crowding agent, PEG can greatly increase PET crystallinity. The crystal and thermal behaviors were characterized by wide-angle x-ray scattering and differential scanning calorimetry. There were two endothermic maxima of the crowding-induced crystallization process as molecular weight and concentration of PEG increased. The theory of crowding can interpret the phenomena well.     

Effect of Dispersion of Carbon Black on Electrical and Thermal Properties of Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate)/Carbon Black Composites

A type of grafted carbon black (GCB), prepared with a low molecular weight antioxidant compound by in-situ reaction, was dispersed in poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) by a melt-blending process. Dispersion of fillers, volume resistivity, and thermal properties were investigated using scanning electron microscopy, a high-resistance meter, differential scanning calorimetry, and thermogravimetric analysis, respectively. The results show that, compared with carbon black (CB) particles, GCB particles dispersed better in the PET matrix, whereas the conductivity percolation threshold of PET/GCB was higher than that of PET/CB. The addition of GCB or CB elevated the cold crystallization temperature of PET, reflecting the effectiveness of carbon fillers as nucleating agents. But carbon fillers decreased the crystallization enthalpy of PET during both heating and cooling process. Both CB and GCB elevated the starting temperature of thermal degradation of PET and increased the amount of residues for the composites over that of neat PET.     

The Nucleation Effect of Grafted Carbon Black on Crystallization of Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate)/Grafted Carbon Black Composite

Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/grafted carbon black (PET/GCB) and poly(ethylene terephthalate)/carbon black (PET/CB) composites were prepared by melt blending. The nucleating effect of CB and GCB were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis. The morphologies of the spherulites in PET, PET/CB and PET/GCB composites were observed by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM). All results showed that GCB had higher nucleating activity than CB in PET and PET/GCB composite had higher rate of nucleation and crystallization. The melting behaviors of neat PET, PET/CB and PET/GCB composites after non‐isothermal crystallization were investigated as well. It was evident that the melting behavior of PET is greatly influenced by addition of CB and GCB.     

Direct characterization of phase behavior and compatibility in PET/HDPE polymer blends by confocal Raman mapping

Morphology, chemical distribution and domain size in poly(ethylene terephthalate)/high‐density poly(ethylene) (PET/HDPE) polymer blends of various ratios prepared with and without maleic anhydride have been analyzed with confocal Raman mapping and SEM. The ratioimage method introduced here allows us to obtain enhanced chemical images with higher contrast and reliability. Compatibility numbers (N_c) are calculated to evaluate the compatibility of the blends. The incompatible polymer blends show heterogeneous distribution with phase separation behavior, while the semicompatible blends prepared with maleic anhydride show much smaller subphase distributions with less distinct interphases. After the blending modification by maleic anhydride of only 0.5%, the viscosity status and dispersibility between PET and HDPE could be substantially improved, and the interactions that exist between the two phases have also been proved by ATR‐FT‐IR results. High‐spatial‐resolution confocal Raman mapping coupled with the ratioimage method provides a very attractive way to characterize the compatibility and phase behavior of the polymer blend through different blending methodologies. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Study on the Nonisothermal Melt Crystallization Kinetics of DBS/PBT Blends

The modified Avrami, Mo, and Kissinger models were applied to investigate the nonisothermal melt crystallization process of dibenzylidene sorbitol (DBS)/poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) blends by differential scanning colorimetry (DSC) measurements. The modified Avrami model can describe the nonisothermal melt crystallization processes of DBS/PBT blends fairly well. The cooling rates and the blend composition affect the crystallization of the blends according to Mo crystallization kinetics parameters. The Mo model shows that F(T) increases with increasing crystallinity, indicating that the needed cooling rate when it reached a certain crystallinity increased in unit time, the crystallization rate of DBS/PBT blends is faster than the crystallization rate of pure PBT, and the crystallization rate of the DBS/PBT blends with 0.5% DBS is fastest. The Kissinger model showed that the crystallization activation energy of DBS/PBT blends is lower than the activation energy of pure PBT; the crystallization activation energy of the DBS/PBT blends with 0.5% DBS is the lowest.     

Isothermal Crystallization and Subsequent Melting Behavior of Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/Silica Nanocomposites

The crystallization process of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/silica nanocomposites were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and then analyzed using the Avrami method. The results indicated that the crystallization of pure poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was fitted for thermal nucleation and three‐dimensional spherical growth throughout the whole process, whereas the crystallization of PET/silica nanocomposites exhibits two stages. The first stage corresponds to athermal nucleation and three‐dimensional spherical growth, and the second stage corresponds to recrystallization caused by the earlier spherulites impingement. The crystallization rate increases remarkably and the activation energies decrease considerably when silica nanoparticles are added. The subsequent melting behavior of the crystallized samples shows that the melting point (T _m) of nanocomposites is higher than that of pure PET, which might be caused by two factors: (1) The higher melting point might be due to some hindrance to the PET chains caused by the nanoparticles at the beginning of the melting process; (2) it might also be the case that more perfect crystals can be formed due to the higher crystallization temperatures and lower activation energies of PET/silica nanocomposites.     

Crystallization Behavior and Crystal Morphology of PTT/PBT Blends

The crystallization behavior and crystal morphology of the poly(trimethyl terephthalate) (PTT)/poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) blends were investigated by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD) and polarized light microscopy (PLM) techniques. It was found that the two components crystallized simultaneously in the crystalline regions. The degree of crystallinity changed with PTT content. Crystalline properties were worse when the ratio of PBT and PTT contents was close to 50:50, but were better when PBT content was greatly different from PTT content.     

Isothermal Crystallization Kinetics and Melting Behavior of Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/Attapulgite Nanocomposites Studied by Step-scan DSC

The crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/attapulgite (AT) nanocomposites and their melting behaviors after isothermal crystallization from the melt were investigated by DSC and analyzed using the Avrami method. The isothermal crystallization kinetics showed that the addition of AT increased both the crystallization rate and the isothermal Avrami exponent of PET. Step-scan differential scanning calorimetry was used to study the influence of AT on the crystallization and subsequent melting behavior in conjunction with conventional DSC. The results revealed that PET and PET/AT nanocomposites experience multiple melting and secondary crystallization processes during heating. The melting behaviors of PET and PET/AT nanocomposites varied in accordance with the crystallization temperature and shifted to higher temperature with the increase of AT content and isothermal crystallization temperature. The main effect of AT nanoparticles on the crystallization of PET was to improve the perfection of PET crystals and weaken its recrystallization behavior.     

Moisture barrier of AlxOy coating on poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(ethylene naphthalate) and poly(carbonate) substrates

The moisture barrier property of Al_xO_y coated poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), poly(ethylene naphthalate) (PEN) and poly(carbonate) (PC), have been investigated. The differences in the morphology of the Al_xO_y sputtered grown on these substrate were investigated using atomic force microscopy (AFM). The initial growth of the Al_xO_y followed closely the topology of the substrate and an amplified roughness was observed. In the fully grown Al_xO_y, the comparative roughness followed that of the substrates. It has been found that a single layer Al_xO_y improved the moisture barrier of PET by an order of magnitude, PC by two orders of magnitude while no improvement was observed for PEN. UV-ozone treatment on PC further improved the moisture barrier, while no improvement was observed for PET and PEN. The comparative effects of the substrate surface roughness and surface energy on the moisture barrier are discussed.     

CRYSTALLIZATION IN PARTIALLY MOLTEN ORIENTED BLENDS OF POLYCONDENSATES AS REVEALED BY X-RAY STUDIES*

Oriented fibers or films of binary polymer blends from polycondensates were investigated by two-dimensional (2D) wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) during the finishing process of microfibrillar reinforced composite (MFC) preparation, that is, heating to a temperature between the melting temperatures of the two components, isothermal annealing, and subsequent cooling. It is shown that the crystallization behavior in such MFC from polycondensates depends not only on the blend composition, but also on thermal treatment conditions. Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polyamide 12 (PET/PA12), poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ether ester) (PBT/PEE), and PET/PA6 (polyamide 6) composites were prepared in various compositions from the components. Materials were investigated using rotating anode and synchrotron X-ray source facilities. The effect of the annealing time on the expected isotropization of the lower melting component was studied in the PET/PA6 blend. It was found that PA6 isotropization took place after 2 h; shorter (up to 30 min) and longer (up to 8 h) melt annealing results in oriented crystallization due to different reasons. In PET/PA12 composites, the effect of PA12 transcrystallization with reorientation was confirmed for various blend compositions. The relative strength of the effect decreases with progressing bulk crystallization. Earlier presumed coexistence of isotropic and highly oriented crystallites of the same kind with drawn PBT/PEE blend was confirmed by WAXS from a synchrotron source.

     

Reactive Compatibilization of Poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/Polypropylene Blends by Polypropylene‐graft‐Maleic Anhydride. Part 2. Crystallization Behavior

The crystallization behavior of uncompatibilized and reactive compatibilized poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/polypropylene (PTT/PP) blends was investigated. In both blends, PTT and PP crystallization rates were accelerated by the presence of each other, especially at low concentrations. When PP content in the uncompatibilized blends was increased to 50–60 wt%, PTT showed fractionated crystallization; a small PTT crystallization exotherm appeared at ～135°C besides the normal ～175°C exotherm. Above 70 wt% PP, PTT crystallization exotherms disappeared. In contrast, PP in the blends showed crystallization exotherms at 113–121°C for all compositions. When a maleic anhydride‐grafted PP (PP‐g‐MAH) was added as a reactive compatibilizer, the crystallization temperatures (T _c ) of PTT and PP shifted significantly to lower temperatures. The shift of PTT's T _c was larger than that of the PP, suggesting that addition of the PP‐g‐MAH had a larger effect on PTT's crystallization than on PP due to reaction between maleic anhydride and PTT.

The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics was analyzed by a modified Avrami equation. The results confirmed that PTT's and PP's crystallization was accelerated by the presence of each other and the effect varied with blend compositions. When the PP content increased from 0 to 60 wt%, PTT's Avrami exponent n decreased from 4.35 to 3.01; nucleation changed from a thermal to an athermal mode with three‐dimensional growths. In contrast, when the PTT content increased from 0 to 90 wt% in the blends, changes in PP's n values indicated that nucleation changed from a thermal (0–50 wt% PTT) to athermal (60–70 wt% PTT) mode, and then back to a thermal (80–90 wt% PTT) mode. When PP‐g‐MAH was added as a compatibilizer, the crystallization process shifted considerably to lower temperatures and it took a longer crystallization time to reach a given crystallinity compared to the uncompatibilized blends.