Use of buffering and other means to improve results of problematic pesticides in a fast and easy method for residue analysis of fruits and vegetables

A modification that entails the use of buffering during extraction was made to further improve results for certain problematic pesticides (e.g., folpet, dichlofluanid, chlorothalonil, and pymetrozine) in a simple, fast, and inexpensive method for the determination of pesticides in produce. The method, known as the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) method for pesticide residues in foods, now involves the extraction of the sample with acetonitrile (MeCN) containing 1% acetic acid (HAc) and simultaneous liquid-liquid partitioning formed by adding anhydrous MgSO4 plus sodium acetate (NaAc). The extraction method is carried out by shaking a centrifuge tube which contains 1 mL of 1% HAc in MeCN plus 0.4 g anhydrous MgSO4 and 0.1 g anhydrous NaAc per g sample. The tube is then centrifuged, and a portion of the extract is transferred to a tube containing 50 mg primary secondary amine sorbent plus 150 mg anhydrous MgSO4/mL of extract. After a mixing and centrifugation step, the extract is transferred to autosampler vials for concurrent analysis by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Independent of the original sample pH, the use of buffering during the extraction yields pH <4 in the MeCN extract and >5 in the water phase, which increases recoveries of both acid- and base-sensitive pesticides. The method was evaluated for 32 diverse pesticides in different matrixes, and typical percent recoveries were 95 +/- 10, even for some problematic pesticides. Optional solvent exchange to toluene prior to GC/MS analysis was also evaluated, showing equally good results with the benefit of lower detection limits, but at the cost of more time, material, labor, and expense.     

Validation of a fast and easy method for the determination of residues from 229 pesticides in fruits and vegetables using gas and liquid chromatography and mass spectrometric detection

Validation experiments were conducted of a simple, fast, and inexpensive method for the determination of 229 pesticides fortified at 10-100 ng/g in lettuce and orange matrixes. The method is known as the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) method for pesticide residues in foods. The procedure involved the extraction of a 15 g sample with 15 mL acetonitrile, followed by a liquid-liquid partitioning step performed by adding 6 g anhydrous MgSO4 plus 1.5 g NaCl. After centrifugation, the extract was decanted into a tube containing 300 mg primary secondary amine (PSA) sorbent plus 1.8 g anhydrous MgSO4, which constituted a cleanup procedure called dispersive solid-phase extraction (dispersive SPE). After a second shaking and centrifugation step, the acetonitrile extract was transferred to autosampler vials for concurrent analysis by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry with an ion trap instrument and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry with a triple quadrupole instrument using electrospray ionization. Each analytical method was designed to analyze 144 pesticides, with 59 targeted by both instruments. Recoveries for all but 11 of the analytes in at least one of the matrixes were between 70-120% (90-110% for 206 pesticides), and repeatabilities typically <10% were achieved for a wide range of fortified pesticides, including methamidophos, spinosad, imidacloprid, and imazalil. Dispersive SPE with PSA retained carboxylic acids (e.g., daminozide), and <50% recoveries were obtained for asulam, pyridate, dicofol, thiram, and chlorothalonil. Many actual samples and proficiency test samples were analyzed by the method, and the results compared favorably with those from traditional methods.     

底物固相分散法测定土壤中甲氰菊酯残留量

以甲氰菊酯为分析对象，将一种新型的样品预处理技术-底物固相分散法(MSPD)应用于测定土壤中农药残留。确定了MSPD法的实验条件：土壤量为4g，水的加入量为1mL，固相吸附剂弗罗里硅土的用量为10．0g，淋洗剂为15mL石油醚-乙酸乙酯(1 9)。土壤样品在此条件下处理后无需进一步净化即可用气相色谱／电子捕获检定器测定。三种土壤的三种加标水平的回收率均在90％以上，相对标准偏差小于5％(n＝5)，最小检出质量比为0．002mg/kg。     

Matrix effects in pesticide multi-residue analysis by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

Three sample preparation methods: Luke method (AOAC 985.22), QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe) and matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) were applied to different fruits and vegetables for analysis of 14 pesticide residues by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (HPLC/ESI/MS). Matrix effect, recovery and process efficiency of the sample preparation methods applied to different fruits and vegetables were compared. The Luke method was found to produce least matrix effect. On an average the best recoveries were obtained with the QuEChERS method. MSPD gave unsatisfactory recoveries for some basic pesticide residues. Comparison of matrix effects for different apple varieties showed high variability for some residues. It was demonstrated that the amount of co-extracting compounds that cause ionization suppression of aldicarb depends on the apple variety as well as on the sample preparation method employed.     

气相色谱-三重四极杆质谱动态多反应监测模式测定枸杞干果中118种农药残留

枸杞中丰富的营养物质深受广大消费者喜爱,但也极易受到病虫侵害,农药残留问题引起了人们的广泛关注。基质干扰是微量分析的一个难点,高灵敏度和高选择性的色谱-串联质谱技术是复杂基质中微量分析强有力的工具,动态扫描监测模式的优越性逐渐取代传统的多反应监测扫描模式,简便、快速、省时的QuEChERS前处理方法已被广泛应用于食品的农药残留检测中。采用改良QuEChERS法结合动态多反应监测模式(dMRM),建立了同时检测枸杞干果中118种农药残留的气相色谱-三重四极杆质谱分析方法。实验比较了不同加水量、提取溶剂、提取过程中温度提取条件,以及无水硫酸镁吸水剂、乙二胺-N-丙基硅烷化硅胶PSA、十八烷基硅烷键合硅胶C₁₈净化填料添加量时农药的回收率,确定出最优前处理方法。结果表明,5 g样品经10 mL超纯水复水,用10 mL乙腈浸提,于-18 ℃冷冻10 min后,用缓冲体系盐包提取后,经800 mg无水硫酸镁、150 mg PSA、150 mg C₁₈混合填料净化,基质匹配外标法定量。118种农药在一定范围内线性关系良好,相关系数R²≥0.9923,检出限和定量限分别为0.006~28.344 μg/kg和0.021~94.480 μg/kg, 4个添加水平的回收率为64.97%~126.21%, RSDs均小于19%(n=6)。基质效应考察结果表明,82%的农药呈现为基质增强效应,其他为基质抑制效应;9%的农药表现为强基质效应,其他为中等或弱基质效应;采用基质匹配标准曲线校正,可有效降低基质效应的影响。应用建立的方法测定10批枸杞样品,全部样品有农药检出,共检出农药22种。该方法操作简便快速,准确可靠,适用于枸杞干果中农药多残留的日常检测和快速筛查。     

A rapid multiresidue method for determination of pesticides in fruits and vegetables by using acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and solid-phase extraction column cleanup

A modification of a rapid and inexpensive multiresidue method for determination of pesticides in fruits and vegetables (QuEChERS method) is presented. Samples were extracted by shaking with acetic acid-acetonitrile (1 + 99). Water was removed by liquid-liquid partitioning with magnesium sulfate and sodium acetate. The extract was subjected to a single solid-phase extraction (SPE) column cleanup, which produced a cleaner extract than did the dispersive SPE cleanup used in the original QuEChERS method. Recovery data were obtained for 316 pesticide residues, at levels ranging from 20 ppb to 1.0 ppm. Data were provided by 3 different laboratories. The modified QuEChERS method resulted in a 65% reduction in solvent usage, when compared with the traditional multiresidue methods previously used in our laboratories.     

Multiresidue determination of pesticides in honey by matrix solid-phase dispersion and gas chromatography with electron-capture detection

A multiresidue method was developed for the determination of 15 pesticides (organochlorines, organophosphorus compounds, pyrethroids, and other acaricides) in various commercial honeys (eucalyptus, lavender, orange, rosemary, and multifloral). The analytical procedure is based on the matrix solid-phase dispersion of honey in a mixture of Florisil and anhydrous sodium sulfate; the mixture is placed in small plastic columns and extracted with hexane-ethyl acetate (90 + 10, v/v). The pesticide residues are determined by capillary gas chromatography with electron-capture detection. Recoveries with the method at concentrations between 0.15 and 1.5 microg/g ranged from 80 to 113%, and relative standard deviations were <10% for all the pesticides studied. The pesticide detection limits were within the range 0.5-5 microg/kg for organochlorines, around 3 microg/kg for the chlorinated organophosphorus pesticides studied, near 15 microg/kg for fluvalinate, and about 3 microg/kg for the other pyrethroids.     

QuEChERS-液相色谱-质谱法快速筛查和确证大米中205种农药残留

结合QuEChERS法与液相色谱-三重四极杆复合线性离子阱质谱(LC-Q-TRAP/MS)技术,建立了大米中205种农药残留的快速筛查确证方法。大米样品经乙腈提取,N-丙基乙二胺(PSA)、无水MgSO₄和C₁₈吸附剂净化后,采用多反应监测-信息关联采集-增强子离子(MRM-IDA-EPI)扫描方式及谱库检索技术,通过对化合物的保留时间、离子对以及高灵敏度的EPI谱库检索比对,完成了205种农药的筛查与确证,并采用外标法定量,实现了大米样品中205种农药的定性和定量分析。结果表明,所有农药的线性相关系数均大于0.995;方法的定量限在0.5~10.0 μg/kg之间。在10、50 μg/kg两个添加水平下,205种农药的平均回收率在62.4%~127.1%之间;相对标准偏差(RSD)在1.0%~20.0%之间。该方法能够对大米样品进行实际检测,且检测时间不超过20 min。该方法快速、准确、灵敏度高,适合于大米中农药残留的快速、全面筛查和确证分析。     

Determination of Organophosphorus Pesticides in Soil by MMSPD-GC-NPD and Confirmation by GC-MS

A novel method, modified matrix solid-phase dispersion (MMSPD), has been developed for quantitative analysis of organophosphorus pesticide residues in soil. It was based on matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) and continuous liquid-solid extraction (continuous LSE), using Florisil as sorbent and dichloromethane as the recycling solvent. Two soils with different texture and physicochemical properties were studied to validate the method. The effect of residence time of pesticides in soil was also studied. MMSPD was compared with MSPD and continuous LSE respectively. Determination was carried out by gas chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection (GC-NPD). The method gave recoveries ranging from 72–105% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) lower than 15% for the pesticides studied. The limits of detection (LODs) ranged from 0.1 to 0.6 ng g⁻¹. Two pesticide residues have been detected in real soil samples from Fujian, China, using MMSPD. The pesticides were confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in a selected-ion monitoring (SIM) mode. Revised: 4 and 9 April 2006     

A review of sample preparation methods for the pesticide residue analysis in foods

The pesticide residues in foods have received increasing attention as one of the most important food safety issues. Therefore, more strict regulations on the maximum residue limits (MRLs) for pesticides in foods have been established in many countries and health organizations, based on the sensitive and reliable analysis methods of pesticide residues. However, the analysis of pesticide residues is a continuing challenge mainly because of the small quantities of analytes as well as the large amounts of interfering substances which can be co-extracted with them, often leading to experimental errors and damage to the analytical instruments. Thus, extensive sample preparation is often required for the pesticide residue analysis for the effective extraction of the analytes and removal of the interferences. This paper focuses on reviewing the recent development in the sample preparation methods for the pesticide residue analysis in foods since 2006. The methods include: liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), supercritical-fluid extraction (SFE), pressurized-liquid extraction (PLE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), gel permeation chromatography (GPC), solid-phase extraction (SPE), molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD), solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME), QuEChERS, cloud point extraction (CPE) and liquid phase micro-extraction (LPME), etc. Particularly their advantages, disadvantages and future perspectives will be discussed.     

Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and "dispersive solid-phase extraction" for the determination of pesticide residues in produce

A simple, fast, and inexpensive method for the determination of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables is introduced. The procedure involves initial single-phase extraction of 10 g sample with 10 mL acetonitrile, followed by liquid-liquid partitioning formed by addition of 4 g anhydrous MgSO4 plus 1 g NaCl. Removal of residual water and cleanup are performed simultaneously by using a rapid procedure called dispersive solid-phase extraction (dispersive-SPE), in which 150 mg anhydrous MgSO4 and 25 mg primary secondary amine (PSA) sorbent are simply mixed with 1 mL acetonitrile extract. The dispersive-SPE with PSA effectively removes many polar matrix components, such as organic acids, certain polar pigments, and sugars, to some extent from the food extracts. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) is then used for quantitative and confirmatory analysis of GC-amenable pesticides. Recoveries between 85 and 101% (mostly > 95%) and repeatabilities typically < 5% have been achieved for a wide range of fortified pesticides, including very polar and basic compounds such as methamidophos, acephate, omethoate, imazalil, and thiabendazole. Using this method, a single chemist can prepare a batch of 6 previously chopped samples in < 30 min with approximately 1 dollar (U.S.) of materials per sample.     

基质固相分散-高效液相色谱法测定鲫鱼肌肉中残留的辛硫磷

建立了鲫鱼肌肉中残留的辛硫磷的基质固相分散-高效液相色谱-二极管阵列检测(MSPD-HPLC-DAD)的分析方法。通过优化样品处理条件,确定选取0.50 g鲫鱼肌肉样品与1.5 g弗罗里硅土、0.5 g无水硫酸钠混合研磨,并采用丙酮-正己烷溶液(体积比为40:60)为洗脱剂,洗脱剂用量为25 mL。优选的最佳色谱条件为：ODS色谱柱(250 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm),流动相为甲醇-水(体积比为50:50),流速0.6 mL/min,检测波长270 nm,进样量为20 μL。在上述条件下,辛硫磷质量浓度在0.01～10 mg/L范围内与响应信号呈良好的线性关系(r20.9994),检出限为3.3 μg/kg;相对标准偏差为1.1%～6.3%(n7);3个添加水平(0.05,0.1,1 mg/kg)下得到的回收率为88%～112%。该方法操作简单,耗时少,精密度高,符合农残分析的要求。     

Development of Validated Method Using QuEChERS Technique for Organochlorine Pesticide Residues in Vegetable

A simple method was evaluated for the determination of 18 pesticide residues (alpha-BHC, betha-BHC, gamma-BHC, delta-BHC, Heptachlor, Aldrin, α-Endosulfan, DDE, Dieldrin, Endrin , β-Endosulfan, DDD, Endrin Aldehid, Endosulfan Sulfat, DDT, Endrin Keton and Metoxychlor) in lettuce where pesticide residues were extracted and cleaned using a buffered QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe) method, followed by GC-MS analysis. This extraction method involves first mixing the sample with acetonitrile and permit the salt out liquid-liquid partitioning step using anhydrous MgSO₄ and sodium acetate. After shaking and centrifugation, cleanup is done by dispersive solid phase extraction (d-SPE) using 150 mg of anhydrous MgSO₄, 150 mg of PSA, and 50 mg of C-18 per milliiter of extract. The optimized analytical conditions were evaluated in terms of recoveries, repeatability, limits of quantitation and matrix effects for lettuce sample. Use of matrix matched standards provided acceptable results for most pesticides with overall average recoveries between 70 and 120% and consistent RSD < 15% for organochlorine pesticides.     

Determination of 266 pesticide residues in apple juice by matrix solid-phase dispersion and gas chromatography-mass selective detection

A macro matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) method was developed to extract 266 pesticides from apple juice samples prior to gas chromatography-mass selective detection (GC-MSD) determination. A 10 g samples was mixed with 20 g diatomaceous earth. The mixture was transferred into a glass column. Pesticide residues were leached with a 160 mL hexane-dichloromethane (1:1) at 5 mL/min. Two hundred and sixty-six pesticides were divided into three groups and detected by GC-MSD under selective ion monitoring. The proposed method takes advantage of both liquid-liquid extraction and conventional MSPD methods. Application was illustrated by the analysis of 236 apple juice samples produced in Shaanxi province China mainland this year.     

蔬菜中有机氯农药残留的超临界流体提取和气相色谱法测定

建立了用超临界流体萃取、气相色谱测定韭菜中百菌清、艾氏剂、狄氏剂、异狄氏剂残留量的方法。样品与无水硫酸镁混合后进行萃取。用正交设计法选择萃取条件,最佳条件为压力３０．４ＭＰａ,温度４０℃。静态萃取时间１ｍｉｎ,ＣＯ２用量１５ｍＬ,收集液为乙酸乙酯。     

人参中农药多残留的超高效液相色谱-串联质谱分析方法研究

以传统中药人参为研究对象, 建立一种同时检测人参中46 种农药多残留的基质固相分散-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱(MSPD-UPLC-MS/MS)方法. 前处理方法分别采用N-丙基乙二胺(PSA)和乙腈作为MSPD的分散剂和洗脱剂, 检测方法采用正负离子同时扫描, 利用超高效液相色谱-串联质谱在分时段多反应监测模式下进行定量和定性分析. 大部分农药在5～500 μg/kg 范围内线性关系良好, 在低(10 μg/kg)、中(50 μg/kg)、高(100 μg/kg)三个浓度水平上的添加回收率平均值在70%～110%之间, 相对标准偏差(RSD)小于15% (n＝3), 定量限小于0.01 mg/kg, 能够满足农药多残留分析要求. 该方法通用性强、选择性好、灵敏度高、简单廉价.     

Determination of phenolic compounds in wines by novel matrix solid-phase dispersion extraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

A novel matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) extraction method was developed to extract simultaneously 23 phenolic compounds from wine samples prior to determination by gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection in the selected ion monitoring mode. Different parameters of the MSPD technique such as dispersant solid-phase, eluting solvent, and sample ionic strength and pH were optimized. The optimized MSPD procedure requires a small volume of wine (1 mL), commercial silica gel (1.5 g) as dispersant solid-phase and a small volume of ethyl acetate (5 mL) as eluting solvent. Under these conditions, the extraction of the studied compounds was almost complete (mean values of recoveries between 87 and 109%) in a short time (15 min). Moreover, satisfactory standard deviations of repeatability (RSD<9% in most cases), linear regression coefficients (r(2)>0.993) and detection limits (<8 microg/L) confirm the usefulness of the methodology for routine monitoring of the concentration of individual phenolic antioxidants in wines. Application was illustrated by analysis of different wine samples.     

Determination of pesticide residues in foods by acetonitrile extraction and partitioning with magnesium sulfate: collaborative study

A collaborative study was conducted to determine multiple pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables using a quick, simple, inexpensive, and effective sample preparation method followed by concurrent analysis with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and liquid chromatography/ tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). For short, the method is known as QuEChERS, which stands for quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe. Twenty representative pesticides were fortified in 3 matrixes (grapes, lettuces, and oranges) at 3 duplicate levels unknown to the collaborators ranging from 10 to 1000 ng/g. Additionally, 8 incurred pesticide residues were determined. Thirteen laboratories from 7 countries provided results in the study, and a variety of different instruments were used by collaborators. The QuEChERS procedure simply entails 3 main steps: (1) a 15 g homogenized sample is weighed into a 50 mL centrifuge tube to which 15 mL acetonitrile containing 1% HOAc is added along with 6 g MgSO4 and 1.5 g NaOAc, and the tube is shaken and centrifuged; (2) a portion of the extract is mixed with 3 + 1 (w/w) MgSO4-primary secondary amine sorbent (200 mg/mL extract) and centrifuged; and (3) the final extract is analyzed by GC/MS and LC/MS/MS. To detect residues <10 ng/g in GC/MS, large-volume injection of 8 microL is typically needed, or the extract can be concentrated to 4 g/mL in toluene, in which case 2 microL splitless injection is used. In the study, the averaged results for data from 7-13 laboratories (not using internal standardization) for the 18 blind duplicates at the 9 spiking levels in the 3 matrixes are as follows [%recovery and reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSD(R), %)]: atrazine, 92 (18); azoxystrobin, 93 (15); bifenthrin, 90 (16); carbaryl, 96 (20); chlorothalonil, 70 (34); chlorpyrifos, 89 (25); cyprodinil, 89 (19); o,p'-DDD, 89 (18); dichlorvos, 82 (21); endosulfan sulfate, 80 (27); imazalil, 77 (33); imidacloprid, 96 (16); linuron, 89 (19); methamidophos, 87 (17); methomyl, 96 (17); procymidone, 91 (20); pymetrozine, 69 (19); tebuconazole, 89 (15); tolylfluanid (in grapes and oranges), 68 (33); and trifluralin, 85 (20). For incurred pesticides, kresoxim-methyl (9.2 +/- 3.2 ng/g) and cyprodinil (112 +/- 18) were found in the grapes; permethrins (112 +/- 41), lamda-cyhalothrin (58 +/- 11), and imidacloprid (12 +/- 2) were determined in the lettuces; and ethion (198 +/- 36), thiabendazole (53 +/- 8), and imazalil (13 +/- 4) were determined in the oranges. Chlorpyrifosmethyl (200 ng/g) was used as a quality control standard added during sample homogenization and yielded 86% recovery and 19% RSD(R). Intralaboratory repeatabilities for the method averaged 9.8% RSD for all analytes. The results demonstrate that the method is fit-for-purpose to monitor many pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables, and the Study Director recommends that it be adopted Official First Action.     

Multiplug filtration clean‐up with multiwalled carbon nanotubes in the analysis of pesticide residues using LC–ESI‐MS/MS

A novel design for a rapid clean‐up method was developed for the analysis of pesticide residues in fruit and vegetables followed by LC–ESI‐MS/MS. The acetonitrile‐based sample extraction technique was used to obtain the extracts, and further clean‐up was carried out by applying the streamlined procedure on a multiplug filtration clean‐up column coupled with a syringe. The sorbent used for clean‐up in this research is multiwalled carbon nanotubes, which was mixed with anhydrous magnesium sulfate to remove water from the extracts. This method was validated on 40 representative pesticides and apple, cabbage, and potato sample matrices spiked at two concentration levels of 10 and 100 μg/kg. It exhibited recoveries between 71 and 117% for most pesticides with RSDs < 15%. Matrix‐matched calibrations were performed with the coefficients of determination >0.995 for most studied pesticides between concentration levels of 10–500 μg/L. The LOQs for 40 pesticides ranged from 2 to 50 μg/kg. The developed method was successfully applied to the determination of pesticide residues in market fruit and vegetable samples.     

Response surface optimization for determination of pesticide multiresidues by matrix solid-phase dispersion and gas chromatography

An optimized multiresidue analysis method based on matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) and gas chromatography (GC) is proposed for the determination of organochlorines and pyrethroids in the tea samples. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize the extraction conditions of MSPD, such as the sorbent type, eluent composition, dichloromethane concentration and eluting volume. Desirability function approach was employed to optimize the pesticide recoveries and matrix cleanup. Compromising the recoveries and cleanup degree, MSPD was carried out with Florisil as the sorbent and n-hexane-dichloromethane (1:1, v/v) as the eluent. The pesticide recoveries in tea samples were better than 80% spiked in the concentration range of 0.01-0.05mg/kg and the relative standard deviations were lower than 7%. The quantification limits of the pesticides were in the range of 0.002-0.06mg/kg, which were lower than the maximum residue limits of the pesticides in tea samples established by the European Union.