On-line coloring of perfect graphs

Lovász, Saks, and Trotter showed that there exists an on-line algorithm which will color any on-linek-colorable graph onn vertices withO(nlog^(2k–3) n/log^(2k–4) n) colors. Vishwanathan showed that at least (log ^k–1 n/k ^k ) colors are needed. While these remain the best known bounds, they give a distressingly weak approximation of the number of colors required. In this article we study the case of perfect graphs. We prove that there exists an on-line algorithm which will color any on-linek-colorable perfect graph onn vertices withn ^10k/loglogn colors and that Vishwanathan's techniques can be slightly modified to show that his lower bound also holds for perfect graphs. This suggests that Vishwanathan's lower bound is far from tight in the general case.Research partially supported by Office of Naval Research grant N00014-90-J-1206.     

On-line coloringk-colorable graphs

We show that for anyk, there exists an on-line algorithm that will color anyk-colorable graph onn vertices withO(n ^1−1/k! ) colors. This improves the previous best upper bound ofO(nlog^(2k−3) n/log^(2k−4) n) due to Lovász, Saks, and Trotter. In the special casesk=3 andk=4 we obtain on-line algorithms that useO(n ^2/3log^1/3 n) andO(n ^5/6log^1/6 n) colors, respectively.     

List multicoloring problems involving the k‐fold Hall numbers

We show that the four‐cycle has a k‐fold list coloring if the lists of colors available at the vertices satisfy the necessary Hall's condition, and if each list has length at least ?5k/3?; furthermore, the same is not true with shorter list lengths. In terms of h^(k)(G), the k ‐fold Hall number of a graph G, this result is stated as h^(k)(C₄)=2k??k/3?. For longer cycles it is known that h^(k)(C_n)=2k, for n odd, and 2k??k/(n?1)?≤h^(k)(C_n)≤2k, for n even. Here we show the lower bound for n even, and conjecture that this is the right value (just as for C₄). We prove that if G is the diamond (a four‐cycle with a diagonal), then h^(k)(G)=2k. Combining these results with those published earlier we obtain a characterization of graphs G with h^(k)(G)=k. As a tool in the proofs we obtain and apply an elementary generalization of the classical Hall–Rado–Halmos–Vaughan theorem on pairwise disjoint subset representatives with prescribed cardinalities. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 65: 16–34, 2010.     

Partitioning complete multipartite graphs by monochromatic trees

The tree partition number of an r‐edge‐colored graph G, denoted by t_r(G), is the minimum number k such that whenever the edges of G are colored with r colors, the vertices of G can be covered by at most k vertex‐disjoint monochromatic trees. We determine t₂(K(n₁, n₂,…, n_k)) of the complete k‐partite graph K(n₁, n₂,…, n_k). In particular, we prove that t₂(K(n, m)) = ? (m‐2)/2ⁿ? + 2, where 1 ≤ n ≤ m. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 48: 133–141, 2005     

Constrained Ramsey numbers for rainbow matching

The Ramsey number R_k(G) of a graph G is the minimum number N, such that any edge coloring of K_N with k colors contains a monochromatic copy of G. The constrained Ramsey number f(G, T) of the graphs G and T is the minimum number N, such that any edge coloring of K_N with any number of colors contains a monochromatic copy of G or a rainbow copy of T. We show that these two quantities are closely related when T is a matching. Namely, for almost all graphs G, f(G, tK₂) = R_{t ? 1}(G) for t≥2. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 67:91‐95, 2011     

Rainbow Numbers for Cycles with Pendant Edges

A subgraph of an edge-colored graph is called rainbow if all of its edges have different colors. For a graph H and a positive integer n, the anti-Ramsey number f (n, H) is the maximum number of colors in an edge-coloring of K _n with no rainbow copy of H. The rainbow number rb(n, H) is the minimum number of colors such that any edge-coloring of K _n with rb(n, H) number of colors contains a rainbow copy of H. Certainly rb(n, H) = f(n, H) + 1. Anti-Ramsey numbers were introduced by Erdős et al. [4] and studied in numerous papers. We show that for n ≥ k + 1, where C _k ⁺ denotes a cycle C _k with a pendant edge.     

An Anti-Ramsey Theorem on Diamonds

Let G be the diamond (the graph obtained from K ₄ by deleting an edge) and, for every n ≥ 4, let f(n, G) be the minimum integer k such that, for every edge-coloring of the complete graph of order n which uses exactly k colors, there is at least one copy of G all whose edges have different colors. Let ext(n, {C ₃, C ₄}) be the maximum number of edges of a graph on n vertices free of triangles and squares. Here we prove that for every n ≥ 4,

A parallel algorithm for generating multiple ordering spanning trees in undirected weighted graphs

1.IntroductionLetG=(V,E,W)beaconnected,weightedandundirectedgraph,VeEE,w(e)(相似文献   

Sharp Bounds For Some Multicolor Ramsey Numbers

Let H ₁,H ₂, . . .,H _k+1 be a sequence of k+1 finite, undirected, simple graphs. The (multicolored) Ramsey number r(H ₁,H ₂,...,H _k+1) is the minimum integer r such that in every edge-coloring of the complete graph on r vertices by k+1 colors, there is a monochromatic copy of H _i in color i for some 1ik+1. We describe a general technique that supplies tight lower bounds for several numbers r(H ₁,H ₂,...,H _k+1) when k2, and the last graph H _k+1 is the complete graph K _m on m vertices. This technique enables us to determine the asymptotic behaviour of these numbers, up to a polylogarithmic factor, in various cases. In particular we show that r(K ₃,K ₃,K _m ) = (m ³ poly logm), thus solving (in a strong form) a conjecture of Erdos and Sós raised in 1979. Another special case of our result implies that r(C ₄,C ₄,K _m ) = (m ² poly logm) and that r(C ₄,C ₄,C ₄,K _m ) = (m ²/log² m). The proofs combine combinatorial and probabilistic arguments with spectral techniques and certain estimates of character sums.* Research supported in part by a State of New Jersey grant, by a USA Israeli BSF grant and by a grant from the Israel Science Foundation. Research supported by NSF grant DMS 9704114.     

On the multi‐colored Ramsey numbers of cycles

For a graph L and an integer k≥2, R_k(L) denotes the smallest integer N for which for any edge‐coloring of the complete graph K_N by k colors there exists a color i for which the corresponding color class contains L as a subgraph. Bondy and Erdos conjectured that, for an odd cycle C_n on n vertices, They proved the case when k = 2 and also provided an upper bound R_k(C_n)≤(k+ 2)!n. Recently, this conjecture has been verified for k = 3 if n is large. In this note, we prove that for every integer k≥4, When n is even, Sun Yongqi, Yang Yuansheng, Xu Feng, and Li Bingxi gave a construction, showing that R_k(C_n)≥(k?1)n?2k+ 4. Here we prove that if n is even, then © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 69: 169‐175, 2012     

Posets and planar graphs

A k-decomposition (G₁,…,G_k) of a graph G is a partition of its edge set to form k spanning subgraphs G₁,…,G_k. The classical theorem of Nordhaus and Gaddum bounds χ(G₁) + χ(G₂) and χ(G₁)χ(G₂) over all 2-decompositions of K_n. For a graph parameter p, let p(k;G) denote the maximum of over all k-decompositions of the graph G. The clique number ω, chromatic number χ, list chromatic number χℓ, and Szekeres–Wilf number σ satisfy ω(2;K_n) = χ(2;K_n) = χℓ(2;K_n) = σ(2;K_n) = n + 1. We obtain lower and upper bounds for ω(k;K_n), χ(k;K_n), χℓ(k;K_n), and σ(k;K_n). The last three behave differently for large k. We also obtain lower and upper bounds for the maximum of χ(k;G) over all graphs embedded on a given surface. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

On the structure of linear graphs

Denote byG(n; m) a graph ofn vertices andm edges. We prove that everyG(n; [n ²/4]+1) contains a circuit ofl edges for every 3 ≦l<c ₂ n, also that everyG(n; [n ²/4]+1) contains ak _e(u _n, u_n) withu _n=[c ₁ logn] (for the definition ofk _e(u _n, u_n) see the introduction). Finally fort>t ₀ everyG(n; [tn ^3/2]) contains a circuit of 2l edges for 2≦l<c ₃ t ². This work was done while the author received support from the National Science Foundation, N.S.F. G.88.     

The asymptotic number of labeled connected graphs with a given number of vertices and edges

Let c(n, q) be the number of connected labeled graphs with n vertices and q ≤ N = (2n ) edges. Let x = q/n and k = q ? n. We determine functions w_k ? 1. a(x) and φ(x) such that c(n, q) ? w_k(q^N)eⁿφ(x)+a(x) uniformly for all n and q ≥ n. If ? > 0 is fixed, n→ ∞ and 4q > (1 + ?)n log n, this formula simplifies to c(n, q) ? (N^q) exp(–ne^?2q/n). on the other hand, if k = o(n^1/2), this formula simplifies to c(n, n + k) ? 1/2 w_k (3/π)^1/2 (e/12k)^k/2nⁿ?^(3k?1)/2.     

The number of ideals in a quadratic field

LetK be a quadratic Geld, and letR(N) be the number of integer ideals inK with norm at most AT. Letx with conductork be the quadratic character associated withK. Then |R(N)−NL(1,x)|⩽Bk ^50/73 N ^23/73(logN)^461/146 forN ≥Ak, whereA andB are constants. ForN ≥Ak ^c,C sufficiently large, the factork ^50/73 may be replaced by (d(k))^4/73 k ^46/73. Dedicated to the memory of Professor K G Ramanathan     

An Explicit Construction for a Ramsey Problem

An explicit coloring of the edges of K_n is constructed such that every copy of K₄ has at least four colors on its edges. As n , the number of colors used is n^1/2+o(1). This improves upon the previous bound of O(n^2/3) due to Erds and Gyárfás obtained by probabilistic methods. The exponent 1/2 is optimal, since it is known that at least (n^1/2) colors are required in such a coloring.The coloring is related to constructions giving lower bounds for the multicolor Ramsey number r_k(C₄). It is more complicated however, because of restrictions imposed on interactions between color classes.* Research supported in part by NSF Grant No. DMS–9970325.     

On Some Three-Color Ramsey Numbers

 In this paper we study three-color Ramsey numbers. Let K _i,j denote a complete i by j bipartite graph. We shall show that (i) for any connected graphs G ₁, G ₂ and G ₃, if r(G ₁, G ₂)≥s(G ₃), then r(G ₁, G ₂, G ₃)≥(r(G ₁, G ₂)−1)(χ(G ₃)−1)+s(G ₃), where s(G ₃) is the chromatic surplus of G ₃; (ii) (k+m−2)(n−1)+1≤r(K _1,k , K _1,m , K _n )≤ (k+m−1)(n−1)+1, and if k or m is odd, the second inequality becomes an equality; (iii) for any fixed m≥k≥2, there is a constant c such that r(K _k,m , K _k,m , K _n )≤c(n/logn), and r(C _2m , C _2m , K _n )≤c(n/logn) ^m/(m−1) for sufficiently large n. Received: July 25, 2000 Final version received: July 30, 2002 RID="*" ID="*" Partially supported by RGC, Hong Kong; FRG, Hong Kong Baptist University; and by NSFC, the scientific foundations of education ministry of China, and the foundations of Jiangsu Province Acknowledgments. The authors are grateful to the referee for his valuable comments. AMS 2000 MSC: 05C55     

There exist graphs with super‐exponential Ramsey multiplicity constant

The Ramsey multiplicity M(G;n) of a graph G is the minimum number of monochromatic copies of G over all 2‐colorings of the edges of the complete graph K_n. For a graph G with a automorphisms, ν vertices, and E edges, it is natural to define the Ramsey multiplicity constant C(G) to be , which is the limit of the fraction of the total number of copies of G which must be monochromatic in a 2‐coloring of the edges of K_n. In 1980, Burr and Rosta showed that 0 ≥ C(G) ≤ 2^1?E for all graphs G, and conjectured that this upper bound is tight. Counterexamples of Burr and Rosta's conjecture were first found by Sidorenko and Thomason independently. Later, Clark proved that there are graphs G with E edges and 2^E?1C(G) arbitrarily small. We prove that for each positive integer E, there is a graph G with E edges and C(G) ≤ E^{?E/2 + o(E)}. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 57: 89–98, 2008     

How quadratic are the natural numbers?

Abstract. For natural numbers n we inspect all factorizations n = ab of n with a ￡ ba \le b in \Bbb N\Bbb N and denote by n=a_n b_nn=a_n b_n the most quadratic one, i.e. such that b_n - a_nb_n - a_n is minimal. Then the quotient k(n) : = a_n/b_n\kappa (n) := a_n/b_n is a measure for the quadraticity of n. The best general estimate for k(n)\kappa (n) is of course very poor: 1/n ￡ k(n) ￡ 11/n \le \kappa (n)\le 1. But a Theorem of Hall and Tenenbaum [1, p. 29], implies(logn)^-d-e ￡ k(n) ￡ (logn)^-d(\log n)^{-\delta -\varepsilon } \le \kappa (n) \le (\log n)^{-\delta } on average, with d = 1 - (1+log₂  2)/log2=0,08607 ?\delta = 1 - (1+\log _2 \,2)/\log 2=0,08607 \ldots and for every e > 0\varepsilon >0. Hence the natural numbers are fairly quadratic.¶k(n)\kappa (n) characterizes a specific optimal factorization of n. A quadraticity measure, which is more global with respect to the prime factorization of n, is k^*(n): = ?_{1 ￡ a ￡ b, ab=n} a/b\kappa ^*(n):= \textstyle\sum\limits \limits _{1\le a \le b, ab=n} a/b. We show k^*(n) ~ \frac 12\kappa ^*(n) \sim \frac {1}{2} on average, and k^*(n)=W(2^{\frac 12(1-e) log n/log ₂n})\kappa ^*(n)=\Omega (2^{\frac {1}{2}(1-\varepsilon ) {\log}\, n/{\log} _2n})for every e > 0\varepsilon>0.     

On the Slowly Well Orderedness of εo

For α < ε₀, N_α denotes the number of occurrences of ω in the Cantor normal form of α with the base ω. For a binary number-theoretic function f let B(K; f) denote the length n of the longest descending chain (α₀, …, α_n–1) of ordinals <ε₀ such that for all i < n, Nα_i ≤ f (K, i). Simpson [2] called ε₀ as slowly well ordered when B (K; f) is totally defined for f (K; i) = K · (i+ 1). Let |n| denote the binary length of the natural number n, and |n|_k the k-times iterate of the logarithmic function |n|. For a unary function h let L(K; h) denote the function B (K; h₀(K; i)) with h₀(K, i) = K + |i| · |i|_h(i). In this note we show, inspired from Weiermann [4], that, under a reasonable condition on h, the functionL (K; h) is primitive recursive in the inverse h^–1 and vice versa.