Rainbow faces in edge‐colored plane graphs

A face of an edge‐colored plane graph is called rainbow if the number of colors used on its edges is equal to its size. The maximum number of colors used in an edge coloring of a connected plane graph Gwith no rainbow face is called the edge‐rainbowness of G. In this paper we prove that the edge‐rainbowness of Gequals the maximum number of edges of a connected bridge face factor H of G, where a bridge face factor H of a plane graph Gis a spanning subgraph H of Gin which every face is incident with a bridge and the interior of any one face f∈F(G) is a subset of the interior of some face f′∈F(H). We also show upper and lower bounds on the edge‐rainbowness of graphs based on edge connectivity, girth of the dual graphs, and other basic graph invariants. Moreover, we present infinite classes of graphs where these equalities are attained. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 62: 84–99, 2009     

若干图的倍图的均匀邻强边染色

如果图G的一个正常边染色满足相邻点的色集不同,且任意两种颜色所染边数目相差不超过1,则称为均匀邻强边染色,其所用最少染色数称为均匀邻强边色数．本文得到了星、扇和轮的倍图的均匀邻强边色数．     

一些图的Mycielski图的均匀邻强边染色

如果图G的一个正常边染色满足相邻点的色集不同,且任意两种颜色所染边数目相差不超过1,则称为均匀邻强边染色,其所用最少染色数称为均匀邻强边色数.本文得到了路、圈、星和扇的Mycielski图的均匀邻强边色数.     

The heterochromatic cycles in edge-colored graphs

Given a graph and an edge coloring C of G, a heterochromatic cycle of G is a cycle in which any pair of edges have distinct colors. Let d ^c (v), named the color degree of a vertex v, be the maximum number of distinct colored edges incident with v. In this paper, we give several sufficient conditions for the existence of heterochromatic cycles in edge-colored graphs.     

On the adjacent vertex-distinguishing acyclic edge coloring of some graphs

A proper edge coloring of a graph G is called adjacent vertex-distinguishing acyclic edge coloring if there is no 2-colored cycle in G and the coloring set of edges incident with u is not equal to the coloring set of edges incident with v, where uv ∈ E(G). The adjacent vertex distinguishing acyclic edge chromatic number of G, denoted by x′ _Aa (G), is the minimal number of colors in an adjacent vertex distinguishing acyclic edge coloring of G. If a graph G has an adjacent vertex distinguishing acyclic edge coloring, then G is called adjacent vertex distinguishing acyclic. In this paper, we obtain adjacent vertex-distinguishing acyclic edge coloring of some graphs and put forward some conjectures.     

On Neighbor‐Distinguishing Index of Planar Graphs

A proper edge coloring of a graph G without isolated edges is neighbor‐distinguishing if any two adjacent vertices have distinct sets consisting of colors of their incident edges. The neighbor‐distinguishing index of G is the minimum number ndi(G) of colors in a neighbor‐distinguishing edge coloring of G. Zhang, Liu, and Wang in 2002 conjectured that if G is a connected graph of order at least 6. In this article, the conjecture is verified for planar graphs with maximum degree at least 12.     

路与星联图的均匀邻强边色数

如果图G的一个正常边染色满足相邻点的色集不同,且任意两种颜色所染边数相差不超过1,则称为均匀邻强边染色,其所用最少染色数称为均匀邻强边色数.本文得到在m=1,2,3,n≥1和m=n≥4时的均匀邻强边色数.     

Game chromatic index of k‐degenerate graphs

We consider the following edge coloring game on a graph G. Given t distinct colors, two players Alice and Bob, with Alice moving first, alternately select an uncolored edge e of G and assign it a color different from the colors of edges adjacent to e. Bob wins if, at any stage of the game, there is an uncolored edge adjacent to colored edges in all t colors; otherwise Alice wins. Note that when Alice wins, all edges of G are properly colored. The game chromatic index of a graph G is the minimum number of colors for which Alice has a winning strategy. In this paper, we study the edge coloring game on k‐degenerate graphs. We prove that the game chromatic index of a k‐degenerate graph is at most Δ + 3k − 1, where Δ is the maximum vertex degree of the graph. We also show that the game chromatic index of a forest of maximum degree 3 is at most 4 when the forest contains an odd number of edges. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 36: 144–155, 2001     

Acyclic edge chromatic number of outerplanar graphs

A proper edge coloring of a graph G is called acyclic if there is no 2‐colored cycle in G. The acyclic edge chromatic number of G, denoted by χ(G), is the least number of colors in an acyclic edge coloring of G. In this paper, we determine completely the acyclic edge chromatic number of outerplanar graphs. The proof is constructive and supplies a polynomial time algorithm to acyclically color the edges of any outerplanar graph G using χ(G) colors. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 64: 22–36, 2010     

Coloring quasi‐line graphs

A graph G is a quasi‐line graph if for every vertex v, the set of neighbors of v can be expressed as the union of two cliques. The class of quasi‐line graphs is a proper superset of the class of line graphs. A theorem of Shannon's implies that if G is a line graph, then it can be properly colored using no more than 3/2 ω(G) colors, where ω(G) is the size of the largest clique in G. In this article, we extend this result to all quasi‐line graphs. We also show that this bound is tight. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

Signed graph factors and degree sequences

For a signed graph G and function , a signed f‐factor of G is a spanning subgraph F such that sdeg_F(υ) = f(υ) for every vertex υ of G, where sdeg(υ) is the number of positive edges incident with v less the number of negative edges incident with υ, with loops counting twice in either case. For a given vertex‐function f, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for a signed graph G to have a signed f‐factor. As a consequence of this result, an Erd?s‐Gallai‐type result is given for a sequence of integers to be the degree sequence of a signed r‐graph, the graph with at most r positive and r negative edges between a given pair of distinct vertices. We discuss how the theory can be altered when mixed edges (i.e., edges with one positive and one negative end) are allowed, and how it applies to bidirected graphs. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 52: 27–36, 2006     

Rainbow hamilton cycles in random graphs

One of the most famous results in the theory of random graphs establishes that the threshold for Hamiltonicity in the Erd?s‐Rényi random graph G_n,p is around . Much research has been done to extend this to increasingly challenging random structures. In particular, a recent result by Frieze determined the asymptotic threshold for a loose Hamilton cycle in the random 3‐uniform hypergraph by connecting 3‐uniform hypergraphs to edge‐colored graphs. In this work, we consider that setting of edge‐colored graphs, and prove a result which achieves the best possible first order constant. Specifically, when the edges of G_n,p are randomly colored from a set of (1 + o(1))n colors, with , we show that one can almost always find a Hamilton cycle which has the additional property that all edges are distinctly colored (rainbow).Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 44, 328‐354, 2014     

Colored Saturation Parameters for Rainbow Subgraphs

Inspired by a 1987 result of Hanson and Toft [Edge‐colored saturated graphs, J Graph Theory 11 (1987), 191–196] and several recent results, we consider the following saturation problem for edge‐colored graphs. An edge‐coloring of a graph F is rainbow if every edge of F receives a different color. Let denote the set of rainbow‐colored copies of F. A t‐edge‐colored graph G is ‐saturated if G does not contain a rainbow copy of F but for any edge and any color , the addition of e to G in color i creates a rainbow copy of F. Let denote the minimum number of edges in an ‐saturated graph of order n. We call this the rainbow saturation number of F. In this article, we prove several results about rainbow saturation numbers of graphs. In stark contrast with the related problem for monochromatic subgraphs, wherein the saturation is always linear in n, we prove that rainbow saturation numbers have a variety of different orders of growth. For instance, the rainbow saturation number of the complete graph lies between and , the rainbow saturation number of an n‐vertex star is quadratic in n, and the rainbow saturation number of any tree that is not a star is at most linear.     

Interval Non‐edge‐Colorable Bipartite Graphs and Multigraphs

An edge‐coloring of a graph G with colors is called an interval t‐coloring if all colors are used, and the colors of edges incident to any vertex of G are distinct and form an interval of integers. In 1991, Erd?s constructed a bipartite graph with 27 vertices and maximum degree 13 that has no interval coloring. Erd?s's counterexample is the smallest (in a sense of maximum degree) known bipartite graph that is not interval colorable. On the other hand, in 1992, Hansen showed that all bipartite graphs with maximum degree at most 3 have an interval coloring. In this article, we give some methods for constructing of interval non‐edge‐colorable bipartite graphs. In particular, by these methods, we construct three bipartite graphs that have no interval coloring, contain 20, 19, 21 vertices and have maximum degree 11, 12, 13, respectively. This partially answers a question that arose in [T.R. Jensen, B. Toft, Graph coloring problems, Wiley Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization, 1995, p. 204]. We also consider similar problems for bipartite multigraphs.     

(d,1)‐total labeling of graphs with a given maximum average degree

The (d,1)‐total number of a graph G is the width of the smallest range of integers that suffices to label the vertices and the edges of G so that no two adjacent vertices have the same color, no two incident edges have the same color, and the distance between the color of a vertex and its incident edges is at least d. In this paper, we prove that for connected graphs with a given maximum average degree. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

Excluding Induced Subdivisions of the Bull and Related Graphs

For any graph H, let Forb*(H) be the class of graphs with no induced subdivision of H. It was conjectured in [J Graph Theory, 24 (1997), 297–311] that, for every graph H, there is a function f_H: ?→? such that for every graph G∈Forb*(H), χ(G)≤f_H(ω(G)). We prove this conjecture for several graphs H, namely the paw (a triangle with a pendant edge), the bull (a triangle with two vertex‐disjoint pendant edges), and what we call a “necklace,” that is, a graph obtained from a path by choosing a matching such that no edge of the matching is incident with an endpoint of the path, and for each edge of the matching, adding a vertex adjacent to the ends of this edge. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 71:49–68, 2012     

Acyclic edge colorings of graphs

A proper coloring of the edges of a graph G is called acyclic if there is no 2‐colored cycle in G. The acyclic edge chromatic number of G, denoted by a′(G), is the least number of colors in an acyclic edge coloring of G. For certain graphs G, a′(G) ≥ Δ(G) + 2 where Δ(G) is the maximum degree in G. It is known that a′(G) ≤ 16 Δ(G) for any graph G. We prove that there exists a constant c such that a′(G) ≤ Δ(G) + 2 for any graph G whose girth is at least cΔ(G) log Δ(G), and conjecture that this upper bound for a′(G) holds for all graphs G. We also show that a′(G) ≤ Δ + 2 for almost all Δ‐regular graphs. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 37: 157–167, 2001     

Recognizing connectedness from vertex‐deleted subgraphs

Let G be a graph of order n. The vertex‐deleted subgraph G ? v, obtained from G by deleting the vertex v and all edges incident to v, is called a card of G. Let H be another graph of order n, disjoint from G. Then the number of common cards of G and H is the maximum number of disjoint pairs (v, w), where v and w are vertices of G and H, respectively, such that G ? v?H ? w. We prove that if G is connected and H is disconnected, then the number of common cards of G and H is at most ?n/2? + 1. Thus, we can recognize the connectedness of a graph from any ?n/2? + 2 of its cards. Moreover, we completely characterize those pairs of graphs that attain the upper bound and show that, with the exception of six pairs of graphs of order at most 7, any pair of graphs that attains the maximum is in one of four infinite families. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 67:285‐299, 2011     

Vertex-distinguishing proper edge-colorings

An edge-coloring is called vertex-distinguishing if every two distinct vertices are incident to different sets of colored edges. The minimum number of colors required for a vertex-distinguishing proper edge-coloring of a simple graph G is denoted by . A simple count shows that where n_i denotes the number of vertices of degree i in G. We prove that where C is a constant depending only on Δ. Some results for special classes of graphs, notably trees, are also presented. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 26: 73–82, 1997     

A generalization of interval edge-colorings of graphs

An edge-coloring of a graph G with colors 1,2,…,t is called an interval (t,1)-coloring if at least one edge of G is colored by i, i=1,2,…,t, and the colors of edges incident to each vertex of G are distinct and form an interval of integers with no more than one gap. In this paper we investigate some properties of interval (t,1)-colorings. We also determine exact values of the least and the greatest possible number of colors in such colorings for some families of graphs.