Acyl iodides in organic and organoelement chemistry

This review is focused on our and literature data on reactions of acyl iodides RC(O)I with organic (alcohols, ethers, esters, carboxylic acids, amino acids, tertiary amines, nitrogen heterocycles, carbamides, thiocarbamides, and thiols) and organoelement compounds (alkoxy silanes, siloxanes, silylamines, silazanes, silicon-containing amines, and ethynyl silanes, germanes, and stannanes). Photolysis of acyl iodides in arene medium yields a-diketones, products of photochemical Friedel-Crafts acylation and iodination of arenes, and polyarylenation.     

Insights into the Retention Mechanism on a Pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-Bonded Silica Stationary Phase (Discovery HS F5) in RP-LC

The solvation parameter model is used to elucidate the retention mechanism of neutral compounds on the pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Discovery HS F5) with methanol-water and acetonitrile-water mobile phases containing from 10 to 70% (v/v) organic solvent. The dominant factors that increase retention are solute size and electron lone pair interactions while polar interactions reduce retention. A comparison of the retention mechanism with an octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase based on the same silica substrate and with a similar bonding density (Discovery HS C18) provides additional insights into selectivity differences for the two types of stationary phase. The methanol-water solvated pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase is more cohesive and/or has weaker dispersion interactions and is more dipolar/polarizable than the octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase. Differences in hydrogen-bonding interactions contribute little to relative retention differences. For mobile phases containing more than 30% (v/v) acetonitrile selectivity differences for the pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded and octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phases are no more than modest with differences in hydrogen-bond acidity of greater importance than observed for methanol-water. Below 30% (v/v) acetonitrile selectivity differences are more marked owing to incomplete wetting of the octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase at low volume fractions of acetonitrile that are not apparent for the pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase. Steric repulsion affects a wider range of compounds on the octadecylsiloxane-bonded than pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase with methanol mobile phases resulting in additional selectivity differences than predicted by the solvation parameter model. Electrostatic interactions with weak bases were unimportant for methanol-water mobile phase compositions in contrast to acetonitrile-water where ion-exchange behavior is enhanced, especially for the pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase. The above results are compatible with a phenomenological interpretation of stationary phase conformations using the haystack, surface accessibility, and hydro-linked proton conduit models.