Analysis of trace levels of domoic acid in seawater and plankton by liquid chromatography without derivatization,using UV or mass spectrometry detection

Quantitation of trace levels of domoic acid (DA) in seawater samples usually requires labour-intensive protocols involving chemical derivatization with 9-fluorenylmethylchloroformate and liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (FMOC–LC–FLD). Procedures based on LC–MS have been published, but time-consuming and costly solid-phase extraction pre-concentration steps are required to achieve suitable detection limits. This paper describes an alternative, simple and inexpensive LC method with ultraviolet detection (LC–UVD) for the routine analysis of trace levels of DA in seawater without the use of sample pre-concentration or derivatization steps. Qualitative confirmation of DA identity in dubious samples can be achieved by mass spectrometry (LC–MS) using the same chromatographic conditions. Addition of an ion-pairing/acidifying agent (0.15% trifluoroacetic acid) to sample extracts and the use of a gradient elution permitted the direct analysis of large sample volumes (100 μl), resulting in both high selectivity and sensitivity (limit of detection = 42 pg ml⁻¹ by LC–UVD and 15 pg ml⁻¹ by LC–MS). Same-day precision varied between 0.4 and 5%, depending on the detection method and DA concentration. Mean recoveries of spiked DA in seawater by LC–UVD were 98.8% at 0.1–10 ng ml⁻¹ and 99.8% at 50–1000 ng ml⁻¹. LC–UVD exhibited strong correlation with FMOC–LC–FLD during inter-laboratory analysis of Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries cultures containing 60–2000 ng DA ml⁻¹ (r² > 0.99), but more variable results were obtained by LC–MS (r² = 0.85). This new technique was used to confirm the presence of trace DA levels in low-toxicity Pseudo-nitzschia spp. isolates (0.2–1.6 ng ml⁻¹) and in whole-water field samples (0.3–5.8 ng ml⁻¹), even in the absence of detectable Pseudo-nitzschia spp. cells in the water column.     

A simple hollow fiber renewal liquid membrane extraction method for analysis of sulfonamides in honey samples with determination by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

A sensitive and precise analysis using hollow fiber renewal liquid membrane (HFRLM) extraction followed by high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) is described for determination of five sulfonamides in honey samples. In this procedure, the organic solvent introduced directly into the sample matrix extracts the sulfonamides and carries them over the polypropylene porous membrane. An organic solvent is immobilized inside the polypropylene porous membrane, leading to a homogeneous phase. The stripping phase at higher pH in the lumen of the membrane promotes the ionization of the target compounds releasing them to this phase. The most important parameters affecting the extraction efficiency were optimized by multivariable designs (pH and sample mass, pH and buffer for stripping phase, extraction temperature and time, type and volume of extractor solvent and use of salt to saturate the sample). Detection limits in the range of 5.1–27.4 μg kg⁻¹ and linearity coefficient of correlation higher than 0.987 were obtained for the target analytes. The results obtained for the proposed method show that HFRLM–LC–MS/MS can be used for determination of the five sulfonamides studied in honey samples with excellent precision, accuracy, practicality and short analysis time.     

Optimization of antibiotic analysis in water by solid-phase extraction and high performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry

This paper describes the development of an optimized method based on solid-phase extraction (SPE) followed by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) for the simultaneous analysis of ten antibiotic compounds including tetracyclines, sulfonamides, macrolides and quinolones. LC–MS/MS sensitivity has been optimized by alterations to both LC and MS operations. Of the two high resolution columns tested, Waters Symmetry C₁₈ endcapped and Agilent Zorbax Bonus-RP, the latter was found to show better performance in producing sharp peaks and clear separation for most of the target compounds. Optimization of the MS fragmentation collision and cone energy enhanced the peak areas of the target analytes. The recovery of the target compounds from water samples was most efficient on Waters Oasis HLB SPE cartridge, while methanol was shown to be the most suitable solvent for desorbing the compounds from SPE. In addition, acidification of samples prior to SPE was shown to enhance the recovery of the compounds. To ensure a satisfactory recovery, the flow rate through SPE should be maintained at ≤10 mL min⁻¹. The method was successfully applied to the analysis of antibiotics from environmental water samples, with concentrations being <LOD in tap water, between <LOD to 28 ng L⁻¹ in river water and between <LOD to 230 ng L⁻¹ in sewage effluent.     

Comparison of electrospray ionization and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization for multi-residue analysis of biocides,UV-filters and benzothiazoles in aqueous matrices and activated sludge by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

This paper describes the development of a multi-residue method for the determination of 36 emerging organic pollutants (26 biocides, 5 UV-filters and 5 benzothiazoles) in raw and treated wastewater, activated sludge and surface water using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). The target analytes were enriched from water samples adjusted to pH 6 by solid-phase extraction (SPE) on Oasis HLB 200 mg cartridges and eluted with a mixture of methanol and acetone (60/40, v/v). Extraction of freeze-dried sludge samples was accomplished by pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) using a mixture of methanol and water (50/50, v/v) as extraction solvent followed by SPE. LC–tandem MS detection was compared using electrospray ionization (ESI) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) in positive and negative ionization mode. ESI exhibited strong ion suppression for most target analytes, while APCI was generally less susceptible to ion suppression but partially leading to ion enhancement of up to a factor of 10. In general, matrix effects could be compensated using stable isotope-labeled surrogate standards, indicated by relative recoveries ranging from 70% to 130%. In wastewater, activated sludge and surface water up to 33 analytes were detected. Maximum concentrations up to 5.1 and 3.9 μg L⁻¹ were found in raw wastewater for the water-soluble UV-filters benzophenone-4 (BZP-4) and phenylbenz-imidazole sulfonic acid (PBSA), respectively. For the first time, the anti-dandruff climbazole was detected in raw wastewater and in activated sludge with concentrations as high as 1.4 μg L⁻¹ and 1.2 μg g TSS⁻¹, respectively. Activated sludge is obviously a sink for four benzothiazoles and two isothiazolones, as concentrations were detected in activated sludge between 120 ng g TSS⁻¹ (2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, OIT) to 330 ng g TSS⁻¹ (benzothiazole-2-sulfonic acid, BTSA).     

Development and validation of a method for the detection and confirmation of biomarkers of exposure in human urine by means of restricted access material-liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

The present article describes the development and validation of a LC–MS/MS method for the determination and confirmation of biomarkers of exposure to different types of xenobiotics in human urine. The method combines the use of a restricted access material (RAM) coupled on-line to a LC–IT-MS system; in this way, a rapid and efficient matrix cleanup was achieved, reducing manual sample preparation to freezing and sample filtration. The ion trap (IT) mass spectrometry detector provided the selectivity, sensitivity and ruggedness needed for confirmatory purposes. The on-line RAM-LC–MS/MS method developed here has been validated as a quantitative confirmatory method according to the European Union (EU) Decision 2002/657/EC. The validation steps included the verification of linearity, repeatability, specificity, trueness/recovery, reproducibility, stability and ruggedness in fortified urine samples. Repeatability and within-laboratory reproducibility, measured as intraday and interday precisions, were evaluated at two concentration levels, being 12.7% or below at the concentration corresponding to the quantification limits. Matrix effects and non-targeted qualitative analyses were also evaluated in fortified urine samples. Decision limits (CC_α) and detection capabilities (CC_β) were in the range of 3.6–16.5 and 6.0–28.1 ng mL⁻¹ respectively. The results of the validation process revealed that the proposed method is suitable for reliable quantification and confirmation of biomarkers of exposure to xenobiotics in human urine at low ng mL⁻¹ levels. In addition, working in Data-Dependent Scan mode the proposed method can be used for the screening of these compounds in urine samples.     

Development of a multi-class method for the quantification of veterinary drug residues in feedingstuffs by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

A simple multi-residue method was developed for detecting and quantifying 33 analytes from 13 classes of antibiotics (tetracyclines (3), quinolones (7), penicillins (3), ionophore coccidiostats (7), macrolides (3), sulfonamides (1), quinoxalines (2), phenicols (2), lincosamides (1), diaminopyrimidines (1), polypeptides (1), streptogramins (1) and pleuromutilins (1)) in animal feeds. Extraction and clean-up procedures were optimized with spiked piglet feed. Samples were extracted by ultrasonic-assisted extraction with a mixture of methanol/acetonitrile/McIlvaine buffer at pH 4.6 (37.5/37.5/25, v/v/v) containing 0.3% of EDTA-Na₂, followed by a clean up using a dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE) with PSA (primary secondary amine). Detection of antibiotics was achieved by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC–ESI-MS/MS) within 28 min using both positive and negative ESI mode. Average recoveries ranged from 51% (oxytetracycline) to 116% (tilmicosin) with associated relative standard deviations of 7.3% and 9.0% and an overall mean of 87%. Limits of quantification ranged from 3.8 ng g⁻¹ (lincomycin) to 65.0 ng g⁻¹ (bacitracin). Following optimization, the method was further verified for bovine and lamb feedingstuffs; negative matrix effects were evaluated and overcome by a standard addition method.     

Determination of patulin in fruit juice and dried fruit samples by in-tube solid-phase microextraction coupled with liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

A simple and sensitive method for the determination of patulin in fruit juice and dried fruit samples was developed using a fully automated method consisting of in-tube solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled with liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS). Patulin was separated within 5 min by high-performance liquid chromatography using a Synergi MAX-RP 80A column and water/acetonitrile (80/20, v/v) as the mobile phase. Electrospray ionization conditions in the negative ion mode were optimized for MS detection of patulin. The pseudo-molecular ion [M−H]⁻ was used to detect patulin in selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode. The optimum in-tube SPME conditions were 25 draw/eject cycles of 40 μL of sample using a Carboxen 1006 PLOT capillary column as an extraction device. The extracted patulin was readily desorbed from the capillary by passage of the mobile phase, and no carry-over was observed. Using the in-tube SPME LC–MS with SIM method, good linearity of the calibration curve (r = 0.9996) was obtained in the concentration range of 0.5–20 ng/mL using ¹³C₃-patulin as an internal standard, and the detection limit (S/N = 3) of patulin was 23.5 pg/mL. The in-tube SPME method showed >83-fold higher sensitivity than the direct injection method (10 μL injection volume). The within-day and between-day precision (relative standard deviations) were below 0.8% and 5.0% (n = 6), respectively. This method was applied successfully for the analysis of fruit juice and dried fruit samples without interference peaks. The recoveries of patulin spiked into apple juice were >92%, and the relative standard deviations were <4.5%. Patulin was detected at ng/mL levels in various commercial apple juice samples.     

Determination of cyromazine and melamine in chicken eggs using quick,easy, cheap,effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) extraction coupled with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

A rapid and sensitive method has been developed for the simultaneous detection of cyromazine and melamine in chicken eggs using the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) method coupled with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). The optimal extraction solvent for the liquid–liquid extraction was 5 mL of acetonitrile with a 0.1 M hydrochloric acid aqueous solution (99.5:0.5, v/v). The extract was cleaned with 0.5 g of anhydrous magnesium sulfate and 10 mg of graphitized carbon black. The analysis of cyromazine and melamine was accomplished by combining the use of an anion exchange LC column with tandem mass spectrometry in the positive electrospray ionization mode with selected reaction monitoring mode (SRM). The detection limits were 1.6 ng g⁻¹ for cyromazine and 8 ng g⁻¹ for melamine, and the quantitation limits were 5.5 ng g⁻¹ for cyromazine and 25 ng g⁻¹ for melamine. The recoveries of cyromazine and melamine in the spiked egg samples were 83.2% and 104.6%, respectively, with an relative standard deviation (RSD) of less than 18.1%. The intra-day and inter-day precisions, represented by the RSD, ranged from 1.5% to 8.8% and 6.8% to 14.3%, respectively. The proposed method was tested by analyzing chicken eggs from the markets and from the veterinary medicine laboratory. The concentrations of cyromazine and melamine detected in these samples were in the range of 20–94 ng g⁻¹. The results demonstrated that the QuEChERS method combined with LC–MS/MS is a simple, rapid and inexpensive method for the analysis of cyromazine and melamine in eggs.     

Development of a group-specific immunoassay for sulfonamides: Application to bee honey analysis

A set of haptens has been synthesized in order to raise generic polyclonal antibodies against sulfonamides using different strategies. After the screening of all the immunorreagents, a highly sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was set-up for simultaneous determination of six of these antibiotics.The developed procedure allows the screening of: sulfathiazole, sulfamethoxypyridazine, sulfapyridine, sulfamethizole, sulfasalazine and N⁴-phtalylsulfathiazole with good accuracy and precision at level 0.13 ng mL⁻¹ in buffer.The suitability of developed ELISA for its application to honey analysis has been investigated. The antimicrobials were extracted from samples with acetate buffer, and cleaned up by solid phase extraction. The mean recovery found for honey samples, spiked from 1.5 to 4.5 ng mL⁻¹ equivalents of sulfathiazole (24-72 μg sulfathiazole kg⁻¹ honey), was 106%.     

Rapid separation and highly sensitive detection methodology for sulfonamides in shrimp using a monolithic column coupled with BDD amperometric detection

In this report, we aimed to extend our previous efforts toward the evaluation of sulfonamides (SAs) with a boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrode. We improved this method by reducing the analysis time using a monolithic column coupled with amperometric detection to determine seven sulfonamides (sulfaguanidine, sulfadiazine, sulfamethazine, sulfamonomethoxine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfadimethoxine and sulfaquinoxaline). Because of its rapid separation, low back-pressure and high separation efficiency compared to a particle-packed column, a monolithic column (100 mm × 4.6 mm) was used for sulfonamide separation. Chromatographic separation was performed in less than 8 min. The analysis was carried out using phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 3): acetonitrile: methanol in a ratio of 80:15:5 (v/v/v) as the mobile phase with a flow rate of 1.5 mL min⁻¹. The optimal detection potential using hydrodynamic voltammetry was found to be 1.2 V versus Ag/AgCl. The method was applied to determine seven sulfonamides in shrimp after sample preparation by solid-phase extraction. The recoveries of the sulfonamides in spiked shrimp samples at 1.5, 5 and 10 μg g⁻¹ were in the range of 81.7 to 97.5% with a relative standard deviation (R.S.D.) between 1.0 and 4.6%. Our methodology produced results that were highly correlated with HPLC-MS data. Therefore, we propose a method that can be used for the rapid, selective and sensitive evaluation of sulfonamides in contaminated food.     

Development and validation of a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry assay for the simultaneous quantitation of microcystin-RR and its metabolites in fish liver

A novel method for identification and quantification of microcystin-RR (MC-RR) and its metabolites (MC-RR-GSH and MC-RR-Cys) in the fish liver was developed and validated. These analytes were simultaneously extracted from fish liver using water containing EDTA with 5% acetic acid, followed by a mixed-mode cation-exchange SPE (Oasis MCX) and subsequently determined by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization ion trap mass spectrometry (LC–ESI-ITMS). Extraction parameters including volume and pH of eluting solvents, were optimized. Best recoveries were obtained by using 10 mL of 15% ammonia solution in methanol. The mean recoveries at three concentrations (0.2, 1.0, and 5.0 μg g⁻¹ dry weight [DW]) for MC-RR, MC-RR-GSH and MC-RR-Cys were 93.6–99%, 68.1–73.6% and 90.0–95.2%, respectively. Method detection limit (MDL) were 4, 7 and 5 ng g⁻¹ DW for MC-RR, MC-RR-GSH and MC-RR-Cys, respectively. Limits of quantification (LOQs) for MC-RR, MC-RR-GSH and MC-RR-Cys were calculated to be 10, 18 and 13 ng g⁻¹ DW, respectively. Finally, this method was successfully applied to the identification and quantification of MC-RR, MC-RR-GSH and MC-RR-Cys in the liver of bighead carp with acute exposure of MCs.     

Rapid determination of sulfonamides in milk samples using fluorescence spectroscopy and class modeling with n-way partial least squares

In this paper, a methodology to evaluate the probability of false non-compliance and false compliance for screening methods, which give first or second-order multivariate signals is proposed. For this task 120 samples of 6 different kinds of milk have been measured by excitation-emission fluorescence. The samples have been spiked with different amounts of three sulfonamides (sulfadiazine, sulfamerazine and sulfamethazine). These substances have been classified in group B1 (veterinary medicines and contaminants) of annex I of Directive 96/23/EC. The European Union (Commission Regulation EC no. 281/96) has set the maximum residue level (MRL) of total sulfonamides at 100 μg kg⁻¹ in muscle, liver, kidney and milk.The work shows that excitation-emission fluorescence together with the partial least squares class modeling (PLS-CM) procedure may be a suitable and cheap screening method for the total amount of sulfonamides in milk. Three models, PLS-CM, have been built, for the emission and excitation spectra (first-order signals) and for the excitation-emission matrices (second-order signals). In all the cases it reaches probabilities of false compliance below 5% as required by Decision 2002/657/EC.With the same flourescence signals, the total quantity of sulfonamide was calibrated using 2-PLS, 3-PLS and PARAFAC regressions. Using this quantitative approach, the capability of detection, CCβ, around the MRL has been estimated between 114.3 and 115.1 μg kg⁻¹ for a probability of false non-compliance and false compliance equal to 5%.     

Combined use of liquid chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry in systematic screening of pesticides and other contaminants in water samples

As a suitable way for routine screening of pesticides and control of other organic contaminants in water, the combination of liquid chromatography triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (LC–QqQ-MS/MS) and liquid chromatography–hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC–QTOF-MS) has been applied to the analysis of 63 surface and waste water samples after conventional solid-phase extraction (SPE). The extracts were screened for 43 pesticides or degradation products by LC–QqQ-MS/MS achieving limits of detection (LOD) ranged from 0.04 to 2 ng L⁻¹. Of the 43 selected pesticides, 33 were detected in water samples. The ESI–QTOF MS instrument was run using two simultaneous acquisition functions with low and high collision energy (MS^E approach) and acquiring the full mass spectra. A home-made database containing more than 1100 organic pollutants was used for substance identification. Around 250 of these compounds were available at the laboratory as reference standards. Five pesticides and 3 of their degradation products, different to those selected in the QqQ method, were detected by QqTOF-MS. Thirteen pharmaceuticals and two drugs of abuse were also identified in the samples. In practice, the sample preparation proved to be suitable for both techniques and for a wide variety of substances with different polarity. Mutual confirmation and evidence of co-occurrence of several other organic contaminants were the main advantages of the combination of both techniques.     

Validation of a qualitative screening method for pesticides in fruits and vegetables by gas chromatography quadrupole-time of flight mass spectrometry with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization

A wide-scope screening method was developed for the detection of pesticides in fruit and vegetables. The method was based on gas chromatography coupled to a hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer with an atmospheric pressure chemical ionization source (GC-(APCI)QTOF MS). A non-target acquisition was performed through two alternating scan events: one at low collision energy and another at a higher collision energy ramp (MS^E). In this way, both protonated molecule and/or molecular ion together with fragment ions were obtained in a single run. Validation was performed according to SANCO/12571/2013 by analysing 20 samples (10 different commodities in duplicate), fortified with a test set of 132 pesticides at 0.01, 0.05 and 0.20 mg kg⁻¹. For screening, the detection was based on one diagnostic ion (in most cases the protonated molecule). Overall, at the 0.01 mg kg⁻¹ level, 89% of the 2620 fortifications made were detected. The screening detection limit for individual pesticides was 0.01 mg kg⁻¹ for 77% of the pesticides investigated. The possibilities for identification according to the SANCO criteria, requiring two ions with a mass accuracy ≤±5 ppm and an ion-ratio deviation ≤±30%, were investigated. At the 0.01 mg kg⁻¹ level, identification was possible for 70% of the pesticides detected during screening. This increased to 87% and 93% at the 0.05 and 0.20 mg kg⁻¹ level, respectively. Insufficient sensitivity for the second ion was the main reason for the inability to identify detected pesticides, followed by deviations in mass accuracy and ion ratios.     

Analysis of amprolium by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

We present a fast liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) method for the analysis of the coccidiostat amprolium in food samples. Tandem mass spectrometry in a triple quadrupole was used for quantitative purposes, and the information from multiple-stage mass spectrometry in an ion-trap mass analyzer contributed to fragmentation studies. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) in a Fused-Core™ column using isocratic elution (acetonitrile:formic acid/ammonium formate buffer pH 4, 50 mM (60:40)) successfully analyzed this compound in less than 3 min. The HILIC system was coupled to heated electrospray-MS/MS using highly selective-selected reaction monitoring (H-SRM) to improve sensitivity and selectivity for the analysis of amprolium, after a simple sample treatment based on an “extract and shoot” strategy. Accurate mass measurements were performed to identify the interfering compound responsible for causing matrix ion enhancement in the signal of amprolium. The addition of l-carnitine (the interfering compound) (1 μg L⁻¹) to standards and sample extracts allowed the use of the external calibration method for quantitative purposes. The LC–MS/MS (H-SRM) method showed good precision (relative standard deviation, RSD, lower than 13%), accuracy and linearity and allowed the determination of amprolium down to the ppb level (LODs between 0.1 and 0.6 μg kg⁻¹).     

Determination and identification,according to European Union Decision 2002/657/EC,of malachite green and its metabolite in fish by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry using an optimized extraction procedure and three-way calibration

This paper reports a multiresponse optimization of an extraction procedure in the simultaneous determination of malachite green (MG) and its metabolite (leucomalachite green, LMG) in fish by liquid chromatography with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Prior to optimization, the active factors of the extraction procedure were determined by a screening experimental design. Then, in the optimal experimental conditions of the extraction, MG and LMG have been determined by using a three-way calibration model based on parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). The procedure fulfils the performance requirements for a confirmatory method established by the European Union Decision 2002/657/EC. This norm establishes maximum permitted tolerances for relative abundance of the precursor/product ion pairs. There is a reported contradiction in the literature related to the fact that there are standard samples whose concentration is greater than CCα but the maximum permitted tolerances are not fulfilled in the identification of the analytes. In this work, it is shown that with the information provided by PARAFAC this contradiction is avoided. The figures of merit for PARAFAC and univariate calibration procedures were evaluated under optimal conditions in the extraction step. The figures of merit obtained were in the range of 0.13–0.23 μg kg⁻¹ for the decision limit, CCα, (α = 0.01) and 0.22–0.39 μg kg⁻¹ for the detection capability, CCβ, (β = 0.05), whereas mean relative errors in absolute value were in the range of 2.8–4.6% for MG and LMG with PARAFAC calibration. The proposed optimized extraction procedure using a PARAFAC calibration was also applied in the determination of MG and LMG in gilthead bream samples: the decision limit was in the range of 0.45–0.55 μg kg⁻¹, the detection capability was in the range of 0.76–0.92 μg kg⁻¹ for MG and LMG. Trueness was likewise confirmed and the mean of the absolute values of relative errors were between 4.2% and 7.2%.     

Validation and use of a fast sample preparation method and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry in analysis of ultra-trace levels of 98 organophosphorus pesticide and carbamate residues in a total diet study involving diversified food types

This paper reports a comprehensive sensitive multi-residue liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) method for detection, identification and quantitation of 73 pesticides and their related products, a total of 98 analytes, belonging to organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) and carbamates, in foods. The proposed method makes use of a modified QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rigged, and safe) procedure that combines isolation of the pesticides and sample clean-up in a single step. Analysis is performed by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry operated in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode, acquiring two specific precursor-product ion transitions per target compound. Two main fragment ions for each pesticide were obtained to achieve the identification according to the SANCO guidelines 10684/2009. The method was validated with various food samples, including edible oil, meat, egg, cheese, chocolate, coffee, rice, tree nuts, citric fruits, vegetables, etc. No significant matrix effect was observed for tested pesticides, therefore, matrix-matched calibration was not necessary. Calibration curves were linear and covered from 1 to 20 μg L⁻¹ for all compounds studied. The average recoveries, measured at 10 μg kg⁻¹, were in the range 70–120% for all of the compounds tested with relative standard deviations below 20%, while a value of 10 μg kg⁻¹ has been established as the method limit of quantitation (MLOQ) for all target analytes. Similar trueness and precision results were also obtained for spiking at 200 μg kg⁻¹. Expanded uncertainty values were in the range 21–27% while the HorRat ratios were below 1. The method has been successfully applied to the analysis of 700 food samples in the course of a baseline monitoring study of OPPs and carbamates.     

Trace determination of sulfonamides residues in meat with a combination of solid-phase microextraction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

An integrated method of combining solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was evaluated for determination trace amount of sulfonamides in meat products. Eight commonly used sulfonamides, sulfadiazine (SDZ), sulfathiazole (STZ), sulfamerazine (SMR), sulfamethazine (SMT), sulfamonomethoxine (SMMX), sulfamethoxazole (SMXZ), sulfaquinoxaline (SQX) and sulfadimethoxine (SDMX), were investigated in this study. Chromatography was performed on a C₁₈ reversed-phase column using an isocratic acetonitrile in water as the mobile phase. Fiber coated with a 65 μm thickness of polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) was used to extract sulfonamides at optimum conditions. Analytes were desorbed with static desorption in an SPME-HPLC desorbed chamber for 15 min and then determined by LC-MS. The detection limits of these sulfonamides in pork were from 16 μg kg⁻¹ (SMT) to 39 μg kg⁻¹ (SMMX). According to the analysis, the linear range was from 50 to 2000 μg kg⁻¹ with relative standard deviation (R.S.D.s) value below 15% (intra-day) and 19% (inter-day). The proposed method was tested by analyzing meats from a local market for sulfonamides residues. Some sulfonamides in our study were detected in the meat samples. The concentration of these residual sulfonamides ranged from 66 μg kg⁻¹ (SDZ) to 157 μg kg⁻¹ (SQX) in a chicken sample. The results demonstrate that the SPME-LC-MS system is highly effective in analyzing trace sulfonamides in meat products.     

Method validation and comparison of acetonitrile and acetone extraction for the analysis of 169 pesticides in soya grain by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

An acetonitrile-based extraction method for the analysis of 169 pesticides in soya grain, using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) in the positive and negative electrospray ionization (ESI) mode, has been optimized and validated. This method has been compared with our earlier published acetone-based extraction method, as part of a comprehensive study of both extraction methods, in combination with various gas chromatography–(tandem) mass spectrometry [GC–MS(/MS)] and LC–MS/MS techniques, using different detection modes. Linearity of calibration curves, instrument limits of detection (LODs) and matrix effects were evaluated by preparing standards in solvent and in the two soya matrix extracts from acetone and acetonitrile extractions, at seven levels, with six replicate injections per level. Limits of detection were calculated based on practically realized repeatability relative standard deviations (RSDs), rather than based on (extrapolated) signal/noise ratios. Accuracies (as % recoveries), precision (as repeatability of recovery experiments) and method limits of quantification (LOQs) were compared. The acetonitrile method consists of the extraction of a 2-g sample with 20 mL of acetonitrile (containing 1% acetic acid), followed by a partitioning step with magnesium sulphate and a subsequent buffering step with sodium acetate. After mixing an aliquot with methanol, the extract can be injected directly into the LC–MS/MS system, without any cleanup. Cleanup hardly improved selectivity and appeared to have minor changes of the matrix effect, as was earlier noticed for the acetone method. Good linearity of the calibration curves was obtained over the range from 0.1 or 0.25 to 10 ng mL⁻¹, with r² ≥ 0.99. Instrument LOD values generally varied from 0.1 to 0.25 ng mL⁻¹, for both methods. Matrix effects were not significant or negligible for nearly all pesticides. Recoveries were in the range 70–120%, with RSD ≤ 20%. If not, they were still mostly in the 50–70% range, with good precision (RSD ≤ 20%). The method LOQ values were most often 10 μg kg⁻¹ for almost all pesticides, with good repeatability RSDs. Apart from some minor pros and cons, both compared methods are fast, efficient and robust, with good method performances. The two methods were applied successfully in a routine analysis environment, during surveys in 2007 and 2008.     

Large-scale pesticide testing in olives by liquid chromatography–electrospray tandem mass spectrometry using two sample preparation methods based on matrix solid-phase dispersion and QuEChERS

In this work we have evaluated the performance of two sample preparation methodologies for the large-scale multiresidue analysis of pesticides in olives using liquid chromatography–electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). The tested sample treatment methodologies were: (1) liquid–liquid partitioning with acetonitrile followed by dispersive solid-phase extraction clean-up using GCB, PSA and C₁₈ sorbents (QuEChERS method – modified for fatty vegetables) and (2) matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) using aminopropyl as sorbent material and a final clean-up performed in the elution step using Florisil. An LC–MS/MS method covering 104 multiclass pesticides was developed to examine the performance of these two protocols. The separation of the compounds from the olive extracts was achieved using a short C₁₈ column (50 mm × 4.6 mm i.d.) with 1.8 μm particle size. The identification and confirmation of the compounds was based on retention time matching along with the presence (and ratio) of two typical MRM transitions. Limits of detection obtained were lower than 10 μg kg⁻¹ for 89% analytes using both sample treatment protocols. Recoveries studies performed on olives samples spiked at two concentration levels (10 and 100 μg kg⁻¹) yielded average recoveries in the range 70–120% for most analytes when QuEChERS procedure is employed. When MSPD was the choice for sample extraction, recoveries obtained were in the range 50–70% for most of target compounds. The proposed methods were successfully applied to the analysis of real olives samples, revealing the presence of some of the target species in the μg kg⁻¹ range. Besides the evaluation of the sample preparation approaches, we also discuss the use of advanced software features associated to MRM method development that overcome several limitations and drawbacks associated to MS/MS methods (time segments boundaries, tedious method development/manual scheduling and acquisition limitations). This software feature recently offered by different vendors is based on an algorithm that associates retention time data for each individual MS/MS transition, so that the number of simultaneously traced transitions throughout the entire chromatographic run (dwell times and sensitivity) is maximized.