配合物[M(CO)3(PPh2py)2](M=Fe,Ru)异构体的理论研究

对PPh2py配合物[M(CO)3(PPh2py)2](M=Fe, Ru)的三种构型的异构体1-6进行了研究. 其中PPh2py以两个P原子与M配位形成HH构型1(Fe)和4(Ru), 以一个P和一个N原子与M配位形成HT构型2(Fe)和5(Ru), 以两个N原子与M配位形成HH’构型3(Fe)和6(Ru). 结果表明, (1) PPh2py中P原子对HOMO轨道的贡献最大, PPh2py作为电子给体时易以P原子与金属原子结合. (2)从分子能量和相互作用能数据表明, 配合物中HH构型最稳定, HH'构型最不稳定, 这与合成产物为HH构型的结果一致. (3) 键长和Wiberg键级均表明P—M键比N—M键结合力强. P、M原子间存在σ键, 而N、Fe原子间仅存在nN→n*M或nN→σ*M-P的电荷转移作用. (4) HH构型中M对HOMO的贡献最大, PPh2py向M的电荷转移最强, 使M的负电荷最大, 故HH构型最易作为电子给体以M原子与第二个金属配位形成双核配合物.     

Ir(CO)Cla(Ph2Ppy)2HgClb(HgCl2)c (a,b=1, 2, c=0, 1)的Ir-Hg相互作用和氧化还原反应性质

应用密度泛函理论(DFT)的PBE0方法, 金属原子采用SDD基组, H、C、O和N原子采用6-31G*基组, P和Cl原子采用6-311G*基组, 对单核配合物Ir(CO)Cl(Ph2Ppy)2(1), 双核配合物Ir(CO)(Cl)2(Ph2Ppy)2HgCl(2)、Ir(CO)Cl(Ph2Ppy)2HgCl2(3)和Ir(CO)(Cl)2(HgCl2)(Ph2Ppy)2HgCl(4)进行结构优化, 并在优化的基础上采用基组重叠误差(BSSE)校正计算相互作用能, 通过自然键轨道(NBO)和前线轨道分析研究Ir-Hg相互作用和氧化还原反应的实质. 通过计算发现, Ir(CO)Cl(Ph2Ppy)2与HgCl2发生氧化还原反应得到的产物2和4比非氧化还原产物3稳定. Ir-Hg相互作用强度顺序为3<4<2, 且随着Ir-Hg相互作用强度增大, HOMO轨道中Ir和Hg成分逐渐趋于接近. 配合物2和4都具有一对Ir-Hg成键与反键轨道, 其成键轨道的组成分别为0.5985sd0.06Hg+0.8012sd2.48Ir和0.5794sd0.05Hg+0.8151sd2.48Ir, 但3中Ir与Hg的相互作用较弱, 只存在弱相互作用(电荷转移作用), 表现为nIr→nHg的直接作用和σIr—P(1)→nHg、σIr—C(1)→nHg的间接作用.     

配合物[Fe(CO)x(Ph2Ppy)y(HgCl2)z](x=3, 4; y=1, 2; z=0, 1, 2)的Fe-Hg相互作用及31P化学位移的理论研究

用密度泛函理论PBE0法计算配合物[Fe(CO)x(Ph2Ppy)y(HgCl2)z](1: x=4, y=1, z=0; 2: x=3, y=2, z=0; 3: x=4, y=1, z=1; 4: x=3, y=2, z=1; 5: x=4, y=1, z=2; 6: x=3, y=2, z=2)的几何构型, 用PBE0-GIAO法计算配合物1~6的31P化学位移. 计算结果表明, 含2个Ph2Ppy的配合物5和6的Fe—Hg相互作用略大于含单个Ph2Ppy的配合物3和4. 含2个HgCl2的配合物4和6存在Fe—Hg σ键, 比含单个HgCl2的配合物3和5的Fe—Hg相互作用强, 配合物3和5的Fe—Hg相互作用以Fe→Hg和Fe←Hg离域为主. 配合物3中Fe的负电荷比5的小, 故配合物5的Fe—Hg相互作用比配合物3的强且Fe→Hg离域比较显著, 而配合物3的Fe←Hg离域更显著. Fe—Hg相互作用增大了双核配合物中P核周围的电子密度, 其31P化学位移比相应的单核配合物小, 且含2个HgCl2的双核配合物的31P化学位移更小. 含单个Ph2Ppy的配合物的31P化学位移小于含2个Ph2Ppy的配合物.     

[Ti(CO)6(MPEt3)]-(M=Au,Ag,Cu)配合物稳定性及其电子性质的量子化学研究

采用abinitioHF和密度泛函B₃LYP方法对[Ti(CO)₆(AuPEt₃)]^-配合物稳定性进行系统理论计算,并对Ti-Au金属-金属相互作用能运用完全均衡校正法对基函数重叠误差(BSSE)进行较正.理论优化的结构与X射线衍射晶体结构实验值基本相符,Ti-Au相互作用能为10.8575eV(B₃LYP/BSSE).进一步探讨Cu族元素为中心的同系配合物离子[Ti(CO)₆(MPR₃)]^-(M=Cu,Ag;R=Me,H)的电子性质及结合能规律,结果表明:Cu族化合物中,Au形成了较为稳定的化合物,表现出金属-金属相互作用影响比较明显.     

H2C[P(Ph)2AUX]2和HC[P(Ph)2AUX]3(X=I,CI)型配合物的构象和Au (I)-Au(I)相互作用的从头算研究

根据配合物H₂C[P(Ph)₂AUX]₂(X=I,CI)和HC[P(Ph)₂AUX]₃(X=I,CI)的晶体结构对它们进行了从头算研究,在MP2近似水平下得到绕C-P旋转所产生构象的势能曲线,从而揭示AU(I)－AU(I)相互作用. 计算结果表明,在所研究的四个配合物中均存在AU(I)-AU(I)相互作用,该作用较弱,约为10. 0～16. 5kJ/mol,与Schmibaur的实验估计值和Pyykko等对其它模型配合物的计算结果接近.     

配合物[M（CO）3（PPh2py）2]（M=Fe，Ru）异构体的理论研究

对PPh2py配合物[M(CO)3(PPh2py)2](M=Fe,Ru)的三种构型的异构体1-6进行了研究.其中PPh2py以两个P原子与M配位形成HH构型1(Fe)和4(Ru),以一个P和一个N原子与M配位形成HT构型2(Fe)和5(Ru),以两个N原子与M配位形成HH'构型3(Fe)和6(Ru).结果表明,(1)PPh2py中P原子对HOMO轨道的贡献最大,PPh2py作为电子给体时易以P原子与金属原子结合.(2)从分子能量和相互作用能数据表明,配合物中HH构型最稳定,HH'构型最不稳定,这与合成产物为HH构型的结果一致.(3)键长和Wiberg键级均表明P-M键比N-M键结合力强.P、M原子间存在σ键,而N、Fe原子间仅存在nN→nM或nN→σM-P的电荷转移作用.(4)HH构型中M对HOMO的贡献最大,PPh2py向M的电荷转移最强,使M的负电荷最大,故HH构型最易作为电子给体以M原子与第二个金属配位形成双核配合物.     

OXO (X=Cl,Br)与X (2P3/2)反应机理的理论研究

用密度泛函B3LYP/6-311+G^**和高级电子相关的组态相互作用QCISD(T)/6-311+G^**方法研究了OXO与X(²P_3/2)双自由基反应的微观机理.研究结果表明:该反应存在两个反应通道,产物分别为XO和X₂+O₂.由于形成产物XO的活化势垒较低,因而是主要反应通道,这与实验观察到的结果是一致的.而形成X₂+O₂的通道从动力学上看是不利的.     

九配位(NH4)3[Dy(TTHA)]·5H2O配合物的合成及结构测定

报道了新型配合物(NH4)3[Dy(TTHA)]*5H2O(TTHA=三乙四胺六乙酸)的分子结构和晶体结构. 配合物晶体参数为 单斜晶系, P2(1)/c空间群, a=1.0353(3) nm, b=1.2746(4) nm, c=2.3141(7) nm, β=91.005(5)°, V=3.053(15 nm3), Z=4, M=795.10, Dc=1.730 g*cm-3, μ= 2.532 mm-1, F(000)=1620. 其R和Rw值分别为0.0332和0.0924(对5390个独立的衍射点), R和Rw值分别为0.0460和0.1012(对所有12395个衍射点). 配合物(NH4)3[Dy(TTHA)]*5H2O中的[Dy(TTHA)]3- 部分是一个九配位的非标准单帽四方反棱柱体结构. 十齿TTHA配体提供四个胺基氮原子和五个羧基氧原子与中心金属Dy(Ⅲ)离子配位. 为使[Dy(TTHA)]3-部分在体内具定向功能, 结构中未参与配位的自由羧酸基(-CH2COO-)可采用某些生物分子修饰.     

光致发光主客体配合物[Au2(μ-PNP)3](ClO4)2的谱学研究

光致发光配合物[Au~2(μ-PNP)~3](ClO~4)~2(PNP=2,6-双二苯基膦吡啶)具有一个空腔,作为一个主体配合物,当客体分子尺寸和性质特点匹配时,主客体分子相互作用,主体配合物光致发光性能和谱学性质发生变化。利用电子吸收光谱、^3^1P核磁共振波谱、发射光谱等方法,对不同客体分子存在下,配合物光物理性质改变情况作了深入的讨论。     

(N_2…CO)~+体系相互作用的密度泛函理论研究

在2种密度泛函方法和适宜基组水平上,对(N2…CO)+体系可能存在的相互作用复合物进行了全自由度能量梯度优化,发现势能面上存在2个能量极小点,均为共平面型。 比较了它们之间的相对稳定性,并对其进行了轨道成键分析,同时探讨了最稳定结构A的正则振动模式。 通过消除基函数引起的重叠误差(BSSE)和零点振动能(ZPVE)的校正,精确求算出复合物结构A、B的相互作用能DE分别为125.0和61.0 kJ/mol, 同等电子体(CO…CO)+相比,二者存在较大的差异。     

Fe–Hg Interactions and P Chemical Shifts in [Fe(CO)3 (PPh2R)2(HgCl2)] (R=pym, fur, py, thi)

In order to study the effects of R group on Fe–Hg interactions and 31P chemical shifts, the structures of mononuclear complexes Fe(CO)₃(PPh₂R)₂ (R=pym:1, fur: 2, py: 3,thi: 4; pym=pyrimidine, fur=furyl, py=pyridine, thi=thiazole) and binuclear complexes [Fe(CO)₃(PPh₂R)₂(HgCl₂)] (R=pym: 5, fur: 6, py: 7, thi: 8) were studied using the density functional theory (DFT) PBE0 method. The 31P chemical shifts were calculated by PBE0-GIAO method. Nature bond orbital (NBO) analyses were also performed to explain the nature of the Fe–Hg interactions. The conclusions can be drawn as follows: (1) The complexes with nitrogen donor atoms are more stable than those with O or S atoms. The more N atoms there are, the higher is the stabilility of the complex. (2) The Fe–Hg interactions play a dominant role in the stabilities of the complexes. In 5 or 6, thereisa σ-bond between Fe and Hg atoms. However, in 7 and 8, the Fe–Hg interactions act as σ_P–Fe→n_Hg and σ_C–Fe→n_Hg delocalization. (3) Through Fe→Hg interactions, there is charge transfer from R groups towards the P, Fe, and Hg atoms, which increases the electron density on P nucleus in binuclear complexes. As a result, compared with their mononuclear complexes, the 31P chemical shifts in binuclear complexes show some reduction.     

Quantum Chemistry Studies on the Fe-Cu Interactions and 31p NMR in Fe（CO）3（Ph2Ppy）2（CuXn） （Xn = Cl2^2-, Cl-, Br-）

In order to study the Fe-Cu interactions and their effects on 31p NMR, the structures of mononuclear complex Fe（CO）3fPhzPpy）a 1 and binuclear complexes Fe（CO）3（PhEPpy）z（CuXn） （2： Xn = Cl2^2-, 3： Xn = Cl-, 4： Xn = Br-） are calculated by density functional theory （DFT） PBE0 method. For complexes 1, 3 and 4, the 31p NMR chemical shifts calculated by PBE0-GIAO method are in good agreement with experimental results. The 31p chemical shift is 82.10 ppm in the designed complex 2. The Fe-Cu interactions （including Fe→Cu and Fe←Cu charge transfer） mainly exhibit the indirect interactions. Moreover, the Fe-Cu（I） interactions （mostly acting as σFe-p→4Scu and aFe-C→4Scu charge transfer） in complexes 3 and 4 are stronger than Fe-Cu（Ⅱ） interactions （mostly acting as σFe-p→4Scu and σFe-p←4Sc,） in complex 2. In complex 2, the stronger Fe←Cu interac- tions, acting as σFe-p←44SCu charge transfer, increase the electron density on P nucleus, which causes the upfield 31p chemical shift compared with mononuclear complex 1. For 3 and 4, although a little deshielding for P nucleus is derived from the delocalization of σFe-p→4Scu due to the Fe→Cu interactions, the stronger σFe-c→np charge-transfer finally increases the electron density on P nucleus. As a result, an upfield 31p chemical shift is observed compared with 1. The stability follows the order of 2〉3=4, indicating that Fe（CO）3（PhzPpy）2（CuCl2） is stable and could be synthesized experimentally. The N-Cu（Ⅱ） interaction plays an important role in the stability of 2. Because the delocalization of σFe-p→4SCu and σFe-c→πc-o weakens the a bonds of Fe-C and ~r bonds of CO, it is favorable for increasing the catalytic activity of binuclear complexes. Complexes 3 and 4 are expected to show higher catalytic activity compared to 2.     

Theoretical Studies on the Fe-M Interactions and 31P NMR in Fe(CO)3(EtPhPpy)2MX2 (X=NCS,SCN, Cl; M=Zn,Cd, Hg)

To study the Fe?M interactions and their effects on 31P NMR, the structures of Fe(CO)3(EtPhPpy)2 1,Fe(CO)3(EtPhPpy)2M(NCS)2 (2: M=Zn, 3: M=Cd, 4: M=Hg) and Fe(CO)3(EtPhPpy)2CdX2 (5: X=Cl,6: X=SCN) were investigated by density functional theory (DFT) PBE0 method. The stabilities S of complexes follow S(2)>S(3)>S(4) and S(3)≈S(6)>S(5), indicating that 6 is stable and may be synthesized.The complexes with thiocyanate are more stable than that with chloride in Fe(CO)3(EtPhPpy)2CdX2.The strength I of Fe-M interactions follows I(2)≈I(3)相似文献   

Ir(CO)Cla(Ph2Ppy)2HgClb(HgCl2)c(a,b=1,2;c=0,1)的Ir-Hg相互作用和氧化还原反应性质

应用密度泛函理论(DFT)的PBEO方法,金属原子采用SDD基组,H、C、O和N原子采用6-31G*基组,P和Cl原子采用6-311G*基组,对单核配合物Ir(CO)Cl(Ph2Ppy)2(1),双核配合物Ir(CO)(Cl)2(Ph2Ppy)2HgCl(2)、Ir(CO)Cl(Ph2Ppy)2HgCl2(3)和Ir(CO)(Cl)2(HgCl2)(Ph2Ppy)2HgCl(4)进行结构优化,并在优化的基础上采用基组重叠误差(BSSE)校正计算相互作用能,通过自然键轨道(NBO)和前线轨道分析研究Ir-Hg相互作用和氧化还原反应的实质.通过计算发现,Ir(CO)Cl(Ph2Ppy)2与HgCl2发生氧化还原反应得到的产物2和4比非氧化还原产物3稳定.Ir-Hg相互作用强度顺序为3＜4＜2,且随着Ir-Hg相互作用强度增大,HOMO轨道中Ir和Hg成分逐渐趋于接近.配合物2和4都具有一对Ir-Hg成键与反键轨道,其成键轨道的组成分别为0.5985sd0.06Hg+0.8012sd2.48Ir和0.5794sd0.05Hg+0.8151sd2.48Ir,但3中Ir与Hg的相瓦作用较弱,只存在弱相互作用(电荷转移作用),表现为nIr→nHg的直接作用和σIr-P(1)→nHg、σIr-C(1)→nHg的间接作用.     

硫代磷酸酯类化合物的^31P化学位移加和规则

对近８０年种自行合成的硫逐及硫超磷酸酯类化合物进行了＾３１Ｐ ＮＭＲ谱的测定，提出了一个经验方程、一套化学位移参数的立体电子效应参数，比较准确地计算了它们的＾１Ｐ化学位移，其计算值与测定值的平均误差为±０．０９６，标准偏差为±０．１３。同时，就取代基的电负性，键角和立体电子效应等对＾３１Ｐ化学位移的影响作了理论上的探讨。     

Zum Einfluß der Substituenten R = Ph,NEt2, iPr und tBu in Triphosphanen, (R2P)2P?SiMe3, und Phosphiden,Li(THF)2[(R2P)2P], auf die Bildung und Eigenschaften von Phosphinophosphiniden-Phosphoranen

Concerning the Influence of the Substituents R = Ph, NEt₂, ⁱPr, and ^tBu in Triphosphanes (R₂P)₂P? SiMe₃ and Phosphides Li(THF)₂[(R₂P)₂P] on the Formation and Properties of Phosphino-phosphinidene-phosphoranes The triphosphanes X₂P? P(SiMe₃)? PY₂ 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and the derived phosphides Li(THF)₂[X₂P? P? PY₂] 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 were synthesized: 5 and 6 with X₂ = ⁱPr₂ and Y₂ = ^tBu₂, 7 and 8 with X₂ = Y₂ = Ph^tBu, 9 and 10 with X₂ = ^tBu₂ and Y₂ = Ph₂, 11 and 12 with X₂ = Y₂ = Ph₂, and 13 and 14 with X₂ = ^tBu₂ and Y₂ = (NEt₂)₂. The silylated triphosphanes at ?70°C in toluene with CBr₄ may yield X₂P? P?P(Br)Y₂ and X₂P? P(Br)? PY₂, and the lithiated phosphides with MeCl may yield X₂P? P?P(Me)Y₂ and X₂P? P(Me)? PY₂ depending on X and Y. The bromiated product of 5 (X₂ = ⁱPr₂, Y₂ = ^tBu₂) is the ylide ⁱPr₂P? P?P(Br)^tBu₂, and the methylated derivatives of 6 are both ⁱPr₂P? P?P(Me)^tBu₂, ^tBu₂P? P?P(Me)ⁱPr and the methylated triphosphane. Ph₂P? P?P(Br)^tBu₂ as well as the brominated triphosphane are obtained from 9 (X₂ = ^tBu₂, Y₂ = Ph₂), and similarly Ph₂P? P?P(Me)^tBu₂ and the methylated triphosphane from 10 . Compound 14 (X₂ = ^tBu₂, Y₂ = (NEt₂)₂ gives rise to the brominated ylide ^tBu₂)P? P?P(Br) · (NEt₂)₂ and to the brominated triphosphane, and on methylation to ^tBu₂P? P?P(Me)(NEt₂)₂ and to ^tBu₂P? P(Me)? P · (NEt₂)₂ (main product). The Br substituted derivatives decompose already on warming to ?30°C, while the methylated compounds are stable up to 20°C.     

[Co4P2(PtBu2)2(CO)8] und [{Co(CO)3}2P4tBu4] aus Co2(CO)8 und tBu2P–P=P(Me)tBu2

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XIX. [Co₄P₂(P^tBu₂)₂(CO)₈] and [{Co(CO)₃}₂P₄^tBu₄] from Co₂(CO)₈ and ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ Co₂(CO)₈ reacts with ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ yielding the compounds [Co₄P₂(P^tBu₂)₂(CO)₈] ( 1 ) and [{η^2tBu₂P=P–P=P^tBu₂}{Co(CO)₃}₂] ( 2 a ) cis, ( 2 b ) trans. In 1 , four Co and two P atoms form a tetragonal bipyramid, in which two adjacent Co atoms are μ₂‐bridged by ^tBu₂P groups. Additionally, two CO groups are linked to each Co atom. In 2 a and 2 b , each of the Co(CO)₃ units is η²‐coordinated to the terminal P₂ units resulting in the cis‐ and trans‐configurations 2 a and 2 b . 1 crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pnnm (No. 58) with a = 879,41(5), b = 1199,11(8), c = 1773,65(11) pm. 2 a crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n (No. 14) with a = 875,97(5), b = 1625,36(11), c = 2117,86(12) pm, β = 91,714(7)°. 2 b crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 (No. 2) with a = 812,00(10), b = 843,40(10), c = 1179,3(2) pm, α = 100,92(2)°, β = 102,31(2)°, γ = 102,25(2)°.