共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
In a recent paper, Ghenciu and Lewis studied strong Dunford-Pettis sets and made the following two assertions:
While the statements are correct, the proofs are flawed. The difficulty with the proofs is discussed, and a fundamental result
of Elton is used to establish a simple lemma which leads to quick proofs of both (1) and (2).
The online version of the original article can be found at . 相似文献
(1) | The Banach space X * contains a nonrelatively compact strong Dunford-Pettis set if and only if ℓ∞ ↪ X *. |
(2) | If c 0 ↪ Y and H is a complemented subspace of X so that H * is a strong Dunford-Pettis space, then W(X, Y) is not complemented in L(X, Y). |
2.
3.
For the Azimi-Hagler spaces more geometric and topological properties are investigated. Any constructed space is denoted by
X
α,p
. We show
相似文献
(i) | The subspace [(e nk )] generated by a subsequence (e nk ) of (e n ) is complemented. |
(ii) | The identity operator from X α,p to X α,p when p > q is unbounded. |
(iii) | Every bounded linear operator on some subspace of X α,p is compact. It is known that if any X α,p is a dual space, then |
(iv) | duals of X α,1 spaces contain isometric copies of ℓ ∞ and their preduals contain asymptotically isometric copies of c 0. |
(v) | We investigate the properties of the operators from X α,p spaces to their predual. |
4.
Let X be a Banach space and let (ξj)j ≧ 1 be an i.i.d. sequence of symmetric random variables with finite moments of all orders. We prove that the following assertions
are equivalent:
Received: 10 January 2005; revised: 5 April 2005 相似文献
1. |
There exists a constant K such that
|
|
2. | X is isomorphic to a Hilbert space. |
5.
In a recent paper, Ghenciu and Lewis studied strong Dunford-Pettis sets and made the following two assertions:
While the statements are correct, the proofs are flawed. The difficulty with the proofs is discussed, and a fundamental result
of Elton is used to establish a simple lemma which leads to quick proofs of both (1) and (2). 相似文献
(1) | The Banach space X * contains a nonrelatively compact strong Dunford-Pettis set if and only if ℓ∞ ↪ X *. |
(2) | If c 0 ↪ Y and H is a complemented subspace of X so that H * is a strong Dunford-Pettis space, then W(X, Y) is not complemented in L(X, Y). |
6.
Kenley Jung 《Mathematische Annalen》2007,338(1):241-248
Suppose M is a tracial von Neumann algebra embeddable into (the ultraproduct of the hyperfinite II1-factor) and X is an n-tuple of selfadjoint generators for M. Denote by Γ(X; m, k, γ) the microstate space of X of order (m, k ,γ). We say that X is tubular if for any ε > 0 there exist and γ > 0 such that if then there exists a k × k unitary u satisfying for each 1 ≤ i ≤ n. We show that the following conditions are equivalent:
Research supported in part by the NSF.
Dedicated to Ed Effros on the occasion of his 70th birthday. 相似文献
• | M is amenable (i.e., injective). |
• | X is tubular. |
• | Any two embeddings of M into are conjugate by a unitary . |
7.
In this paper, we show that algebraic extensions of semi-hyponormal operators (defined below) are subscalar. As corollaries we get the following:
From these results and [Es] it is known that such operators with rich spectra have nontrivial invariant subspaces.The second author was supported by the grant for the promotion of scientic research in women's universities. 相似文献
(1) | Everyk-quasihyponormal operator is subscalar. |
(2) | Every algebraic extension of Aluthge transforms ofp-hyponormal operators is subscalar. |
8.
Let H
1, H
2 be Hilbert spaces and T be a closed linear operator defined on a dense subspace D(T) in H
1 and taking values in H
2. In this article we prove the following results:
We prove all the above results without using the spectral theorem. Also, we give examples to illustrate all the above results. 相似文献
(i) | Range of T is closed if and only if 0 is not an accumulation point of the spectrum σ(T*T) of T*T, In addition, if H 1 = H 2 and T is self-adjoint, then |
(ii) | inf {‖T x‖: x ∈ D(T) ∩ N(T)⊥‖x‖ = 1} = inf {|λ|: 0 ≠ λ ∈ σ(T)} |
(iii) | Every isolated spectral value of T is an eigenvalue of T |
(iv) | Range of T is closed if and only if 0 is not an accumulation point of the spectrum σ(T) of T |
(v) | σ(T) bounded implies T is bounded. |
9.
10.
We introduce a notion which is intermediate between that of taking thew*-closed convex hull of a set and taking the norm closed convex hull of this set. This notion helps to streamline the proof
(given in [FLP]) of the famous result of James in the separable case. More importantly, it leads to stronger results in the
same direction. For example:
相似文献
1. | AssumeX is separable and non-reflexive and its unit sphere is covered by a sequence of balls of radiusa<1. Then for every sequence of positive numbers tending to 0 there is anf εX*, such that ‖f‖ = 1 andf (x)≤1 −ε i , wheneverx εC i ,i=1,2,… |
2. | AssumeX is separable and non-reflexive and letT:Y →X* be a bounded linear non-surjective operator. Then there is anf εX* which does not attain its norm onB X such thatf ∉T(Y). |
11.
John W. Snow 《Algebra Universalis》2005,54(1):65-71
A congruence lattice L of an algebra A is called power-hereditary if every 0-1 sublattice of Ln is the congruence lattice of an algebra on An for all positive integers n. Let A and B be finite algebras. We prove
Received November 11, 2004; accepted in final form November 23, 2004. 相似文献
• | If ConA is distributive, then every subdirect product of ConA and ConB is a congruence lattice on A × B. |
• | If ConA is distributive and ConB is power-hereditary, then (ConA) × (ConB) is powerhereditary. |
• | If ConA ≅ N5 and ConB is modular, then every subdirect product of ConA and ConB is a congruence lattice. |
• | Every congruence lattice representation of N5 is power-hereditary. |
12.
LetK be a class of spaces which are eigher a pseudo-opens-image of a metric space or ak-space having a compact-countable closedk-network. LetK′ be a class of spaces which are either a Fréchet space with a point-countablek-network or a point-G
δ
k-space having a compact-countablek-network. In this paper, we obtain some sufficient and necessary conditions that the products of finitely or countably many
spaces in the classK orK′ are ak-space. The main results are that
Project supported by the Mathematical Tianyuan Foundation of China 相似文献
Theorem A | If X, Y∈K. Then X x Y is a k-space if and only if (X, Y) has the Tanaka's condition. |
Theorem B | The following are equivalent: |
(a) | BF(ω 2)is false. |
(b) | For each X, Y ∈ K′, X x Y is a k-space if and only if (X,Y) has the Tanaka's condition. |
13.
Yuji Kobayashi 《Archiv der Mathematik》2005,85(3):227-232
Let k ≧ 3 be an integer or k = ∞ and let K be a field. There is a recursive family
of finitely presented groups Gn over a fixed finite alphabet with solvable word problem such that
Received: 22 July 2004 相似文献
(1) | the center of Gn is trivial for every |
(2) | the dimension d(n) of the center of the group algebra K · Gn over K is either 1 or k, and |
(3) | it is undecidable given n whether d(n) = 1 or d(n) = k. |
14.
LetG be a finite nonsolvable group andH a proper subgroup ofG. In this paper we determine the structure ofG ifG satisfies one of the following conditions:
相似文献
(1) | Every solvable subgroupK(K⊉H) is eitherp-decomposable or a Schmidt group,p being the smallest odd prime factor of |G|. |
(2) | |G∶H| is divisible by an odd prime and every solvable subgroupK(K⊉H) is either 2′-closed or a Schmidt group. |
(3) | |G∶H| is even and every solvable subgroupK(K⊉H) is either 2-closed or a Schmidt group. |
15.
T. E. Armstrong 《International Journal of Game Theory》1991,20(1):65-90
We consider games in coalition function form on a, generally infinite, algebra of coalitions. For finite algebras the additive part mappingv E(v ¦) is the usual. The concern here is the analogue for infinite algebras. The useful construction is the finitely additive stochastic process of additive parts of the game on the filtration
f
of finite subalgebras of.It is shown that
is an isomorphism between:
相似文献
a) | Additive games and martingales |
b) | Superadditive games and supermartingales |
c) | Shapley's games of bounded deviationBD() in his (1953) dissertation and bounded F-processes of Armstrong (1983) |
d) | Gilboa's spaceBS() (1989) and bounded processes of Armstrong (1983) |
16.
In this paper, we discuss the representation-finite selfinjective artin algebras of classB
n andC
n and obtain the following main results:
For any fieldk, let Λ be a representation-finite selfinjective artin algebras of classB
n orC
n overk.
相似文献
(a) | We give the configuration ofZB n andZC n. |
(b) | We show that Λ is standard. |
(c) | Under the condition ofk being a perfect field, we describe Λ by boundenk-species and show that Λ is a finite covering of the trivial extension of some tilted algebra of typeB n orC n. |
17.
Marcel Erné 《Algebra Universalis》1993,30(4):538-580
We study several kinds of distributivity for concept lattices of contexts. In particular, we find necessary and sufficient conditions for a concept lattice to be
In cases (2), (4) and (5), our criteria are first order statements on objects and attributes of the given context. Several applications are obtained by considering the completion by cuts and the completion by lower ends of a quasiordered set as special types of concept lattices. Various degrees of distributivity for concept lattices are expressed by certain separation axioms for the underlying contexts. Passing to complementary contexts makes some statements and proofs more elegant. For example, it leads to a one-to-one correspondence between completely distributive lattices and so-called Cantor lattices, and it establishes an equivalence between partially ordered sets and doubly founded reduced contexts with distributive concept lattices. 相似文献
(1) | distributive, |
(2) | a frame (locale, complete Heyting algebra), |
(3) | isomorphic to a topology, |
(4) | completely distributive, |
(5) | superalgebraic (i.e., algebraic and completely distributive). |
18.
F. G. Timmesfeld 《Archiv der Mathematik》2002,79(6):404-407
Let Φ be a root system of typeA
ℓ, ℓ ≧ 2,D
ℓ, ℓ ≧ 4 orE
ℓ, 6 ≧ ℓ ≧ 8 andG a group generated by nonidentity abelian subgroupsA
r,r∈Φ, satisfying:
Then it is shown, using [3], thatG is a central product of Lie-type groups corresponding to a decomposition of Φ into root-subsystems. 相似文献
(i) | [A r, As]=1 ifs≠−r and ∉ Φ, |
(ii) | [A r, As]≦A r+s ifr+s∈Φ, |
(iii) | X r=〈Ar, A−r〉 is a rank one group. |
19.
Abstract This paper develops the model theory of ordered structures that satisfy Keisler’s regularity scheme and its strengthening REF
(the reflection scheme) which is an analogue of the reflection principle of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Here is a language with a distinguished linear order <, and REF
consists of formulas of the form
where φ is an -formula, φ
<x
is the -formula obtained by restricting all the quantifiers of φ to the initial segment determined by x, and x is a variable that does not appear in φ. Our results include:
Theorem
The following five conditions are equivalent for a complete first order theory T in a countable language
with a distinguished linear order:
Moreover, if κ is a regular cardinal satisfying κ = κ
<κ
, then each of the above conditions is equivalent to:
相似文献
(1) | Some model of T has an elementary end extension with a first new element. |
(2) | T ⊢ REF . |
(3) | T has an ω 1-like model that continuously embeds ω 1. |
(4) | For some regular uncountable cardinal κ, T has a κ-like model that continuously embeds a stationary subset of κ. |
(5) | For some regular uncountable cardinal κ, T has a κ-like model that has an elementary extension in which the supremum of M exists. |
(6) | T has a κ + -like model that continuously embeds a stationary subset of κ. |
20.
Belmesnaoui Aqzzouz 《Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo》2006,55(2):147-162
We show that if (K,L) is a semi-abelian category, there exists an abelian categoryK
x with the followings properties:
相似文献
1 | The categoryK is a full subcategory ofK x. |
2 | The free objects ofK are projectives inK x. |
3 | A sequence ofK-morphismes isK-exact if, and only if, it isK x-exact. |
4 | To each objectU ofK x we can associate a surjections:X→U whereX is an object ofK. |