Current role of LC–MS(/MS) in doping control

Liquid chromatography–(tandem) mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) has revolutionized the detection assays used in doping control analysis over the last decade. New methods have enabled the determination of drugs that were formerly difficult to detect or undetectable at preceding sample concentrations, and complex and/or time-consuming procedures based on alternative chromatographic–mass spectrometric or immunochemical principles have been replaced by faster, more comprehensive and robust assays. A critical overview of the contributions of LC–MS(/MS) to sports drug testing is provided, including recent developments regarding low and high molecular weight drugs.     

Current role of LC-MS(/MS) in doping control

Liquid chromatography–(tandem) mass spectrometry [(LC-MS(/MS)] has become an integral part of modern sports drug testing as it offers unique capabilities complementing immunological and gas chromatography–(tandem) mass spectrometry [(GC-MS(/MS)]-based detection methods for prohibited compounds. The improved options of fast and sensitive targeted analysis as well as untargeted screening procedures utilizing high resolution/high accuracy mass spectrometry have considerably expanded the tools available to anti-doping laboratories for initial testing and confirmation methods. One approach is to focus on pre-selected target analytes that are measured with utmost specificity and sensitivity using diagnostic precursor–product ion pairs in low resolution tandem mass spectrometers. The other scenario is to measure and plot extracted ion chromatograms of protonated or deprotonated molecules as well as product ions as recorded in the full scan mode with high resolution/high accuracy mass spectrometry. Examples of recent applications of sports drug testing procedures published between 2007 and 2010 are presented and discussed, outlining the particular advantages of the selected approaches as well as their limitations in a short- and long-term perspective.     

Current use of high-resolution mass spectrometry in drug screening relevant to clinical and forensic toxicology and doping control

Clinical and forensic toxicology and doping control deal with hundreds or thousands of drugs that may cause poisoning or are abused, are illicit, or are prohibited in sports. Rapid and reliable screening for all these compounds of different chemical and pharmaceutical nature, preferably in a single analytical method, is a substantial effort for analytical toxicologists. Combined chromatography–mass spectrometry techniques with standardised reference libraries have been most commonly used for the purpose. In the last ten years, the focus has shifted from gas chromatography–mass spectrometry to liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, because of progress in instrument technology and partly because of the polarity and low volatility of many new relevant substances. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), which enables accurate mass measurement at high resolving power, has recently evolved to the stage that is rapidly causing a shift from unit-resolution, quadrupole-dominated instrumentation. The main HRMS techniques today are time-of-flight mass spectrometry and Orbitrap Fourier-transform mass spectrometry. Both techniques enable a range of different drug-screening strategies that essentially rely on measuring a compound’s or a fragment’s mass with sufficiently high accuracy that its elemental composition can be determined directly. Accurate mass and isotopic pattern acts as a filter for confirming the identity of a compound or even identification of an unknown. High mass resolution is essential for improving confidence in accurate mass results in the analysis of complex biological samples. This review discusses recent applications of HRMS in analytical toxicology.     

Study of the microbiodegradation of terpenoid resin-based varnishes from easel painting using pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

The alterations produced by microbiological attack on terpenoid resin-based varnishes from panel and canvas paintings have been evaluated using pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (Py–GC–MS) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The proposed methods include the on-line derivatisation of drying oils and diterpenoid resins using hexamethyldisilazane during pyrolysis and the application of methyl chloroformate as a derivatisation reagent for triterpenoid resins in GC–MS. Two types of specimens, consisting of model oil medium prepared from linseed oil and model spirit varnishes prepared from colophony and mastic resins dissolved in turpentine, have been used as reference materials. For a series of specimens upon which different genera of bacteria and fungi were inoculated and encouraged to grow, analyses indicated that no mechanisms that commonly occur during the attack of enzymes on drying oils and terpenoid biodegraders were observed to occur in the oil medium and varnishes studied. Thus, the degradation pathways observed in the performed trials usually occur as consequence of natural ageing. Specific trials consisting of the application of biocides to uninoculated colophony varnish resulted in the identification of processes that produce undesirable degradation of the varnish due to interactions between the biocide and the varnish components. Finally, the studied biocides—Biotin, New-Des and Nipagine—generally exhibited good inhibiting effects on the microorganisms studied, although some interesting differences were found between them regarding the application method and type of biocide.     

Harmonized internal quality aspects of a multi-residue method for determination of forty-six semivolatile compounds in water by stir-bar-sorptive extraction–thermal desorption gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

Three main aspects of internal quality—internal method validation, internal quality control (IQC), and sample result uncertainty—have been established for a multi-residue method for determination of 46 organic micropollutants (pesticides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) in water by stir-bar-sorptive extraction (SBSE) and thermal desorption (TD) coupled to capillary gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). From data obtained with increasing time, the process mean and standard deviation were used to harmonize the internal quality statistics. The relationship between these statistics and the hydrophobicity of the compounds was evaluated.     

Mass spectrometric approaches in impaired driving toxicology

Driving under the influence of prescribed or illegal drugs increases the risk of having road accidents, just like driving under the influence of alcohol. In forensic toxicology, an increasing number of blood samples must be analyzed for drugs. Immunoassays tailored for a limited number of drugs (of abuse) are usually applied as prescreening tests at the roadside and/or in the laboratory. However, many other common drugs, such as anesthetics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, antihistamines, newer designer drugs, herbal drugs, neuroleptics (antipsychotics), opioids, or sedative-hypnotics, can also impair drivers. Therefore, this paper reviews multianalyte single-stage and tandem gas or liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS or LC-MS) procedures for the screening, identification, and validated quantification of such drugs in blood that have been reported since 2003. Basic information about the biosample assayed, workup, chromatography, the mass spectral detection mode, and validation data is summarized in tables. The pros and cons of the reviewed procedures are critically discussed, particularly with respect to their probable usefulness in impaired driving toxicology. Parts of this review were presented as a plenary lecture at T2007, the joint meeting of the International Council on Alcohol, Drugs, and Traffic Safety (ICADTS) and The International Association of Forensic Toxicologists (TIAFT), Seattle (WA), August 26–30, 2007.     

Assessment of commutability for candidate certified reference material ERM-BB130 “chloramphenicol in pork”

Chloramphenicol (CAP), an effective antibiotic against many microorganisms, is meanwhile banned in the EU for treatment of food-producing animals due to adverse health effects. The Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) is currently developing a certified reference material (CRM) for CAP in pork, intended for validation and method performance verifications of analytical methods. The material will be certified using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) methods and has a target CAP level around the minimum required performance limit (MRPL) of 0.3 μg/kg. To prove that the material can be applied as a quality control tool for screening methods, a commutability study was conducted, involving five commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits and one biosensor assay (BiaCore kit). Meat homogenates (cryo-milled wet tissue) with CAP concentrations around the MRPL and the candidate CRM (lyophilised powder) were measured by LC–MS/MS and GC–MS as well as the six screening methods. Pairwise method comparisons of results obtained for the two sample types showed that the CRM can successfully be applied as quality control (QC) sample to all six screening methods. The study suggests that ERM-BB130 is sufficiently commutable with the investigated assays and that laboratories applying one of the investigated kits therefore benefit from using ERM-BB130 to demonstrate the correctness of their results. However, differences among the assays were observed, either in the abundance of bias between screening and confirmatory LC and GC methods, the repeatability of test results, or goodness of fit between the methods.     

Testing for Drugs in Hair – a Review of Chromatographic Procedures

This article reviews the analysis of drugs and drug metabolites in hair by chromatographic procedures, including the pretreatment steps, and the extraction methods. The general tendency in the last years, to highly sophisticated techniques (GC–MS–NCI, HPLC–MS, GC–MS–MS) illustrates the constant fight for sensitivity.     

Cross validation of multiple methods for measuring pyrethroid and pyrethrum insecticide metabolites in human urine

The objective of our study was to compare three vastly different analytical methods for measuring urinary metabolites of pyrethroid and pyrethrum insecticides to determine whether they could produce comparable data and to determine if similar analytical characteristics of the methods could be obtained by a secondary laboratory. This study was conducted as a part of a series of validation studies undertaken by the German Research Foundation’s Committee on the Standardization of Analytical Methods for Occupational and Environmental Medicine. We compared methods using different sample preparation methods (liquid–liquid extraction and solid-phase extraction with and without chemical derivatization) and different analytical detection methods (gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (single quadrupole), gas chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry (magnetic sector) in both electron impact ionization and negative chemical ionization modes, and high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (triple quadrupole) with electrospray ionization). Our cross validation proved that similar analytical characteristics could be obtained with any combination of sample preparation/analytical detection method and that all methods produced comparable analytical results on unknown urine samples. Cross-method comparison using unknown urine samples revealed reasonably good agreement for any combination of the methods tested     

Determination of adrenolytic drugs by SPME–LC–MS

Five adrenolytic drugs have been analyzed by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS). Samples were prepared by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) using polypyrrole fibers coated on stainless steel support as an adsorbent for the drugs. Adsorption efficiencies were 95% and were close for all the drugs investigated. Relative standard deviations (RSD), calculated for samples prepared in standard solutions, were in the range 2.5–13%, however RSD values for the drugs in human plasma were 2.5–4.5%. Using LC–MS the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) were in the ranges 0.11–0.18 and 0.39–0.54 ng mL⁻¹, respectively, for the five drugs.     

Generic sample preparation combined with high-resolution liquid chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry for unification of urine screening in doping-control laboratories

A unification of doping-control screening procedures of prohibited small molecule substances—including stimulants, narcotics, steroids, β2-agonists and diuretics—is highly urgent in order to free resources for new classes such as banned proteins. Conceptually this may be achieved by the use of a combination of one gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry method and one liquid chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry method. In this work a quantitative screening method using high-resolution liquid chromatography in combination with accurate-mass time-of-flight mass spectrometry was developed and validated for determination of glucocorticosteroids, β2-agonists, thiazide diuretics, and narcotics and stimulants in urine. To enable the simultaneous isolation of all the compounds of interest and the necessary purification of the resulting extracts, a generic extraction and hydrolysis procedure was combined with a solid-phase extraction modified for these groups of compounds. All 56 compounds are determined using positive electrospray ionisation with the exception of the thiazide diuretics for which the best sensitivity was obtained by using negative electrospray ionisation. The results show that, with the exception of clenhexyl, procaterol, and reproterol, all compounds can be detected below the respective minimum required performance level and the results for linearity, repeatability, within-lab reproducibility, and accuracy show that the method can be used for quantitative screening. If qualitative screening is sufficient the instrumental analysis may be limited to positive ionisation, because all analytes including the thiazides can be detected at the respective minimum required levels in the positive mode. The results show that the application of accurate-mass time-of-flight mass spectrometry in combination with generic extraction and purification procedures is suitable for unification and expansion of the window of screening methods of doping laboratories. Moreover, the full-scan accurate-mass data sets obtained still allow retrospective examination for emerging doping agents, without re-analyzing the samples.     

Identification of bacterial <Emphasis Type="Italic">N</Emphasis>-acylhomoserine lactones (AHLs) with a combination of ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC), ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry,and in-situ biosensors

N-Acylated homoserine lactones (AHLs) are produced by Gram-negative bacteria as communication signals and are frequently studied as mediators of the “quorum sensing” response of bacterial communities. Several reports have recently been published on the identification of AHLs from different species and attempts have been made to study their role in natural habitats, for example the surface of plant roots in the rhizosphere. In this article, different analytical methods, including bacterial biosensors and chromatographic techniques, are reviewed. A concept for assignment of the structures of AHLs is also presented. The retention behaviour of derivatives of AHLs containing β-keto or hydroxyl groups and/or double bonds has been evaluated in relation to the separation behaviour of AHLs with saturated and unsubstituted alkanoyl chains. Samples have also been analysed by high resolution mass spectrometry (Fourier-transform ion-cyclotron-resonance mass spectrometry, FTICR-MS), nano liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization ion trap mass spectrometry (nano-LC–MS) and by the aid of a biosensor. The results obtained from ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC), FTICR-MS, nano-LC–MS, and bioassays have been compared to attempt structural characterisation of AHL without chemical synthesis of analytical standards. The method was used to identify the major AHL compound produced by the rhizosphere bacterium Acidovorax sp. N35 as N-(3-hydroxydecanoyl)homoserine lactone.     

Comparison of GC–MS and LC–MS methods for the analysis of antioxidant phenolic acids in herbs

Two methods were developed for the quantitative analysis of phenolic acids in herb extracts. The methods were based on liquid chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC–TOFMS) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The methods were compared in terms of their linearity, repeatability, selectivity, sensitivity and the speed of the analysis. The sensitivity was good for both methods, with limits of detection of <80 ng/ml for most of the compounds. The relative standard deviations (RSD) of the peak areas were on average 7.2% for the LC–TOFMS method and 1.4% for the GC–MS method. Both methods were found to be suitable for the determination of the target analytes, although GC–MS was better suited to the quantitative determination of compounds present at low concentrations.     

Validation of ELISA screening and LC–MS/MS confirmation methods for cocaine in hair after simple extraction

This article describes an easy and innovative extraction procedure for cocaine and its primary metabolite, benzoylecgonine (BE), from hair consisting of sonication with H₂O/0.1% formic acid for 4 h. The same extract was used for screening with an enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) and confirmation by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). For the ELISA screening test a cutoff of 0.5 ng/mg was used according to the Society of Hair Testing recommendations. LC–MS/MS limits of detection (LODs) were established to be 10 pg/mg and 1 pg/mg for cocaine and BE, respectively. Linearity was obtained over a range of 0.2–5 ng/mg for BE (target analyte) in the ELISA screening test, while in the LC–MS/MS method the range was 0.10–10 ng/mg for cocaine and 0.01–10 ng/mg for BE. Intra- and interbatch coefficients of variation and mean relative errors were less than 20% for all analytes and concentrations studied. The validated ELISA and LC–MS/MS methods were applied to 48 hair samples and the results of both methods were compared; ELISA demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 89.2% and 10.8%.     

Determination of different recreational drugs in hair by HS-SPME and GC/MS

A simple procedure combining headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC/MS) to detect and quantify amphetamines, ketamine, methadone, cocaine, cocaethylene and ∆⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in hair is described. This procedure allows, in a single sample, even scant, analysis of drugs requiring different analytical conditions. A hair sample (10 mg) is washed and subjected to acidic hydrolysis. Then the HS-SPME is carried out (10 min at 90 °C) for amphetamines, ketamine, methadone, cocaine and cocaethylene. For derivatization of analytes, the fibre is introduced into the headspace of another closed vial containing acetic anhydride. After a chromatographic run, an alkaline hydrolysis for THC analysis is carried out in the same vial containing the hair sample previously used. For adsorption, the solid-phase microextraction needle is inserted into the headspace of the vial and the fibre is exposed for 30 min at 150 °C. For derivatization of analytes, the fibre is introduced into the headspace of another closed vial containing N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide. The GC/MS parameters were the same for both chromatographic runs. The linearity was proved to be between 0.01 and 10.00 ng/mg. The repeatability (intra- and interday precision) was below 10% as the coefficient of variation for all compounds. The accuracy, as the relative recovery, was 96.2–103.5% (spiked samples) and 88.6–101.7% (quality control sample). The limit of detection ranged from 0.01 to 0.12 ng/mg, and the limit of quantification ranged from 0.02 to 0.37 ng/mg. Application of the procedure to real hair samples is described. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed procedure combining HS-SPME and GC/MS is the first one be to successfully applied to the simultaneous determination of most of the common recreational drugs, including THC, in a single hair sample.     

Selenoproteins: the key factor in selenium essentiality. State of the art analytical techniques for selenoprotein studies

Selenium is an essential element for human health. The benefits of selenium are many including protection against cancer, heart diseases and other cardiovascular and muscle disorders. Selenium is also helpful in controlling gastrointestinal disorders, enhancing immunity of the human body and reducing age-related diseases. The health-promoting properties of Se are due to vital functions of selenoproteins in which selenium is present as selenocysteine, the 21st amino acid. To date, dozens of selenoprotein families have been described though many have roles that have not been fully elucidated. Selenoproteins research has attracted tremendous interest from different scientific areas. Analytical chemists have not remained indifferent to the attractive features of these unique proteins. Different analytical techniques, such as multidimensional chromatography–inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS), electrospray (tandem) mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS), matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of flight (MALDI-TOF) and sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis–laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SDS-PAGE-LA-ICPMS), have been applied to the determination of selenoproteins and selenium-containing proteins. This review describes the best-characterized selenoproteins to date in addition to the major contributions of analytical chemistry to the field of selenoproteins. The article also highlights the challenges of combining elemental and molecular mass spectrometry for the determination of selenoproteins and selenium-containing proteins.     

Current status of hyphenated mass spectrometry in studies of the metabolism of drugs of abuse,including doping agents

This paper reviews scientific contributions on the identification and/or quantification of metabolites of drugs of abuse in in vitro assays or various body samples using hyphenated mass spectrometry. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) as well as liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) approaches are considered and discussed if they have been reported in the last five years and are relevant to clinical and forensic toxicology or doping control. Workup and artifact formation are discussed, and typical examples of studies of the metabolism of designer drugs, doping agents, herbal drugs, and synthetic cannabinoids are provided. Procedures for quantifying metabolites in body samples for pharmacokinetic studies or in enzyme incubations for enzyme kinetic studies are also reviewed. In conclusion, the reviewed papers showed that both GC-MS and LC-MS still have important roles to play in research into the metabolism of drugs of abuse, including doping agents.     

Bioanalytical procedures and recent developments in the determination of opiates/opioids in human biological samples

The use and abuse of illegal drugs affects all modern societies, and therefore the assessment of drug exposure is an important task that needs to be accomplished. For this reason, the reliable determination of these drugs and their metabolites in biological specimens is an issue of utmost relevance for both clinical and forensic toxicology laboratories in their fields of expertise, including in utero drug exposure, driving under the influence of drugs and drug use in workplace scenarios. Most of the confirmatory analyses for abused drugs in biological samples are performed by gas chromatographic–mass spectrometric methods, but use of the more recent and sensitive liquid chromatography–(tandem) mass spectrometry technology is increasing dramatically. This article reviews recently published articles that describe procedures for the detection of opiates in the most commonly used human biological matrices, blood and urine, and also in unconventional ones, e.g. oral fluid, hair, and meconium. Special attention will be paid to sample preparation and chromatographic analysis.     

Carbohydrate Analysis in Fermentation Samples by Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectrometry Detection Using Precolumn Derivatization with Dibenzylamine

Chromatographia - Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) technique has been widely used for the determination of trace carbohydrate compounds in biological samples. However,...     

Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS): a powerful combination for selenium speciation in garlic (Allium sativum)

Liquid chromatography (LC) hyphenated with both elemental and molecular mass spectrometry has been used for Se speciation in Se-enriched garlic. Different species were separated by ion-pair liquid chromatography–inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LC–ICP–MS) after hot-water extraction. They were identified by on-line reversed-phase liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (RPLC–ESI–MS–MS). Se-methionine and Se-methylselenocysteine were determined by monitoring their product ions. Another compound, γ-glutamyl-Se-methylselenocysteine, shown to be the most abundant form of Se in the garlic, was determined without any additional sample pre-treatment after extraction and without the need for a synthesized standard. Product ions for this dipeptide were detected by LC–ESI–MS–MS for three isotopes of Se—⁷⁸ Se, ⁸⁰Se: and ⁸²Se. The method was extended to the species extracted during in-vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Because both Se-methylselenocysteine and γ-glutamyl-Se-methylselenocysteine have anticarcinogenic properties, their extractability and stability during human digestion are very important. Garlic was also treated with saliva, to enable detection and analysis of species extracted during mastication. Detailed information on the extractability of selenium species by both simulated gastric and intestinal fluid are given, and variation of the distribution of Se among the different species with time is discussed. Although the main species in garlic is the dipeptide γ-glutamyl-Se-methylselenocysteine, Se-methylselenocysteine is the main compound present in the extracts after treatment with gastrointestinal fluids. Two more, so far unknown compounds were observed in the chromatogram. The extracted species and their transformations were analysed by combining LC–ICP–MS and LC–ESI–MS–MS. In both the simulated gastric and intestinal digests, Se-methionine, Se-methylselenocysteine, and γ-glutamyl-Se-methylselenocysteine could be determined by LC–ESI–MS–MS by measuring their typical product ions.