Highly Stereoselective β‐Mannopyranosylation via the 1‐α‐Glycosyloxy‐isochromenylium‐4‐gold(I) Intermediates

While the gold(I)‐catalyzed glycosylation reaction with 4,6‐O‐benzylidene tethered mannosyl ortho‐alkynylbenzoates as donors falls squarely into the category of the Crich‐type β‐selective mannosylation when Ph₃PAuOTf is used as the catalyst, in that the mannosyl α‐triflates are invoked, replacement of the ^?OTf in the gold(I) complex with less nucleophilic counter anions (i.e., ^?NTf₂, ^?SbF₆, ^?BF₄, and ^?BAr₄^F) leads to complete loss of β‐selectivity with the mannosyl ortho‐alkynylbenzoate β‐donors. Nevertheless, with the α‐donors, the mannosylation reactions under the catalysis of Ph₃PAuBAr₄^F (BAr₄^F=tetrakis[3,5‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate) are especially highly β‐selective and accommodate a broad scope of substrates; these include glycosylation with mannosyl donors installed with a bulky TBS group at O3, donors bearing 4,6‐di‐O‐benzoyl groups, and acceptors known as sterically unmatched or hindered. For the ortho‐alkynylbenzoate β‐donors, an anomerization and glycosylation sequence can also ensure the highly β‐selective mannosylation. The 1‐α‐mannosyloxy‐isochromenylium‐4‐gold(I) complex ( Cα ), readily generated upon activation of the α‐mannosyl ortho‐alkynylbenzoate ( 1 α ) with Ph₃PAuBAr₄^F at ?35 °C, was well characterized by NMR spectroscopy; the occurrence of this species accounts for the high β‐selectivity in the present mannosylation.     

Isolation and Structure of Germylene‐Germyliumylidenes Stabilized by N‐Heterocyclic Imines

The ditopic germanium complex FGe(NIPr)₂Ge[BF₄] ( 3 [BF₄]; IPr=1,3‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)imidazolin‐2‐ylidene) is prepared by the reaction of the amino(imino)germylene (Me₃Si)₂NGeNIPr ( 1 ) with BF₃?OEt₂. This monocation is converted into the germylene‐germyliumylidene 3 [BAr^F₄] [Ar^F=3,5‐(CF₃)₂‐C₆H₃] by treatment with Na[BAr^F₄]. The tetrafluoroborate salt 3 [BF₄] reacts with 2 equivalents of Me₃SiOTf to give the novel complex (OTf)(GeNIPr)₂[OTf] ( 4 [OTf]), which affords 4 [BAr^F₄] and 4 [Al(OR^F)₄] [R^F=C(CF₃)₃] after anion exchange with Na[BAr^F₄] or Ag[Al(OR^F)₄], respectively. The computational, as well as crystallographic study, reveals that 4 ⁺ has significant bis(germyliumylidene) dication character.     

Ruthenium bidentate phosphine complexes for the coordination and catalytic dehydrogenation of amine- and phosphine-boranes

Addition of the amine–boranes H₃B ? NH₂tBu, H₃B ? NHMe₂ and H₃B ? NH₃ to the cationic ruthenium fragment [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(OH₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 2 ; xantphos=4,5‐bis(diphenylphosphino)‐9,9‐dimethylxanthene; BAr^F₄=[B{3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃}₄]^?) affords the η¹‐B? H bound amine–borane complexes [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NH₂tBu)H][BAr^F₄] ( 5 ), [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NHMe₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 6 ) and [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NH₃)H][BAr^F₄] ( 7 ). The X‐ray crystal structures of 5 and 7 have been determined with [BAr^F₄] and [BPh₄] anions, respectively. Treatment of 2 with H₃B ? PHPh₂ resulted in quite different behaviour, with cleavage of the B? P interaction taking place to generate the structurally characterised bis‐secondary phosphine complex [Ru(xantphos)(PHPh₂)₂H][BPh₄] ( 9 ). The xantphos complexes 2 , 5 and 9 proved to be poor precursors for the catalytic dehydrogenation of H₃B ? NHMe₂. While the dppf species (dppf=1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene) [Ru(dppf)(PPh₃)HCl] ( 3 ) and [Ru(dppf)(η⁶‐C₆H₅PPh₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 4 ) showed better, but still moderate activity, the agostic‐stabilised N‐heterocyclic carbene derivative [Ru(dppf)(ICy)HCl] ( 12 ; ICy=1,3‐dicyclohexylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) proved to be the most efficient catalyst with a turnover number of 76 h^?1 at room temperature.     

Three‐Dimensional Antiferromagnetic Order of Single‐Chain Magnets: A New Approach to Design Molecule‐Based Magnets

Two one‐dimensional compounds composed of a 1:1 ratio of Mn^III salen‐type complex and Ni^II oximato moiety with different counter anions, PF₆^? and BPh₄^?, were synthesized: [Mn(3,5‐Cl₂saltmen)Ni(pao)₂(phen)]PF₆ ( 1 ) and [Mn(5‐Clsaltmen)Ni(pao)₂(phen)]BPh₄ ( 2 ), where 3,5‐Cl₂saltmen^2?=N,N′‐(1,1,2,2‐tetramethylethylene)bis(3,5‐dichlorosalicylideneiminate); 5‐Clsaltmen^2?=N,N′‐(1,1,2,2‐tetramethylethylene)bis(5‐chlorosalicylideneiminate); pao^?=pyridine‐2‐aldoximate; and phen=1,10‐phenanthroline. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction study was carried out for both compounds. In 1 and 2 , the chain topology is very similar forming an alternating linear chain with a [‐Mn^III‐ON‐Ni^II‐NO‐] repeating motif (where ‐ON‐ is the oximate bridge). The use of a bulky counteranion, such as BPh₄^?, located between the chains in 2 rather than PF₆^? in 1 , successfully led to the magnetic isolation of the chains in 2 . This minimization of the interchain interactions allows the study of the intrinsic magnetic properties of the chains present in 1 and 2 . While 1 and 2 possess, as expected, very similar paramagnetic properties above 15 K, their ground state is antiferromagnetic below 9.4 K and paramagnetic down to 1.8 K, respectively. Nevertheless, both compounds exhibit a magnet‐type behavior at temperatures below 6 K. While for 2 , the observed magnetism is well explained by a Single‐Chain Magnet (SCM) behavior, the magnet properties for 1 are induced by the presence in the material of SCM building units that order antiferromagnetically. By controlling both intra‐ and interchain magnetic interactions in this new [Mn^IIINi^II] SCM system, a remarkable AF phase with a magnet‐type behavior has been stabilized in relation with the intrinsic SCM properties of the chains present in 1 . This result suggests that the simultaneous enhancement of both intrachain (J) and interchain (J′) magnetic interactions (with keeping J ? J′), independently of the presence of AF phase might be an efficient route to design high temperature SCM‐based magnets.     

Positional and compositional disorder in a ruthenium(II) piano‐stool complex

In (η⁶‐p‐cymene)(difluorophosphinato‐κO){2‐[(1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl‐κN²]pyridine‐κN}ruthenium(II) 0.85‐hexafluorophosphate 0.15‐tetrafluoroborate, [Ru(PO₂F₂)(C₁₀H₁₄)(C₉H₉N₃)](PF₆)_0.85(BF₄)_0.15, (I), the [PO₂F₂]⁻ ligand exhibits positional disorder due to one F atom and one O atom sharing the same two positions related by a mirror reflection across the O—P—F plane. The correct composition of this coordinated anion was successfully determined to be [PO₂F₂]⁻ by refining the complex with various tetrahedral anions in which terminal atoms have similar atomic form factors. The noncoordinated counter‐ion is compositionally disordered between [PF₆]⁻ and [BF₄]⁻. The difficulty in determining the correct composition of this anion illustrates the importance of a crystallographer remaining impartial and open to encountering unexpected moieties in the process of elucidating a structure.     

(Fluoroorgano)fluoroboranes and ‐borates. 7 [1] The Reaction of RFBF2 and K [RFBF3] (RF = perfluorophenyl‐, perfluoroalk‐1‐enyl‐ and perfluoroalkyl) with Xenon Difluoride in Anhydrous HF

The dissolution of (perfluoroorgano)difluoroboranes R_FBF₂ in anhydrous HF (aHF) resulted in equilibrium mixtures of the starting borane and different kinds of acid‐base products: [H₂F] [R_FBF₂(F · HF)] (R_F = C₆F₅, cis‐C₂F₅CF=CF, trans‐C₄F₉CF=CF) or [H₂F] [R_FBF₃] (R_F = C₆F₁₃). In aHF the aryl compounds C₆F₅BF₂ and K [C₆F₅BF₃] showed two parallel reactivities with XeF₂: xenodeborylation (formation of the [C₆F₅Xe]⁺ cation) and fluorine addition to the aryl group. In aHF perfluoroalk‐1‐enyldifluoroboranes R_FBF₂ as well as potassium perfluoroalk‐1‐enyltrifluoroborates K [R_FBF₃] (R_F = cis‐C₂F₅CF=CF, trans‐C₄F₉CF=CF) underwent only fluorine addition across the carbon‐carbon double bond under the action of XeF₂. Potassium perfluorohexyltrifluoroborate K [C₆F₁₃BF₃] did not react with XeF₂ in aHF.     

Preparation and Structural Characterization of [CpRu(1,10-phenanthroline)(CH3CN)][X] and Precursor Complexes (X=PF6, BArF,TRISPHAT-N)

Cationic [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(CH₃CN)₃]⁺ complex, tris(acetonitrile)(cyclopentadienyl)ruthenium(II), gives rise to a very rich organometallic chemistry. Combined with diimine ligands, and 1,10-phenanthroline in particular, this system efficiently catalyzes diazo decomposition processes to generate metal-carbenes which undergo a series of original transformations in the presence of Lewis basic substrates. Herein, syntheses and characterizations of [CpRu(Phen)(L)] complexes with (large) lipophilic non-coordinating (PF₆⁻ and BAr_F⁻) and coordinating TRISPHAT-N⁻ anions are reported. Complex [CpRu(η⁶-naphthalene)][BAr_F] ( [1][BAr_F] ) is readily accessible, in high yield, by direct counterion exchange between [1][PF₆] and sodium tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate (NaBAr_F) salts. Ligand exchange of [1][BAr_F] in acetonitrile generated stable [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(CH₃CN)₃][BAr_F] ( [2][BAr_F] ) complex in high yield. Then, the desired [CpRu(Phen)(CH₃CN)] ( [3] ) complexes were obtained from either the [1] or [2] complex in the presence of the 1,10-phenanthroline as ligand. For characterization and comparison purposes, the anionic hemilabile ligand TRISPHAT−N (TTN) was introduced on the ruthenium center, from the complex [3][PF₆] , to quantitatively generate the desired complex [CpRu(Phen)(TTN)] ( [4] ) by displacement of the remaining acetonitrile ligand and of the PF₆⁻ anion. Solid state structures of complexes [1][BAr_F] , [2][BAr_F] , [3][BAr_F] , [3][PF₆] and [4] were determined by X-ray diffraction studies and are discussed herein.     

Host–guest‐like thi­amine–anion complexation in thia­minium bis­(tetra­fluoro­borate)

In the title compound, 3‐[(4‐amino‐2‐methyl‐5‐pyrimidin‐1‐io)methyl]‐5‐(2‐hydroxy­ethyl)‐4‐methyl­thia­zolium(2+) bis(tetra­fluoro­borate), C₁₂H₁₈N₄OS²⁺·2BF₄^?, the divalent thia­mine cation (in the F conformation) is associated with BF₄^? anions via two characteristic bridging interactions between the thia­zolium and pyrimidinium rings, i.e. C—H?BF₄^??pyrimidinium and N—H?BF₄^??thia­zolium interactions. Thi­amine mol­ecules are linked by N—H?O hydrogen bonds to form a helical chain structure.     

Ionic Association of the Ionic Liquids [C4mim][BF4], [C4mim][PF6], and [Cnmim]Br in Molecular Solvents

Considering the ionic nature of ionic liquids (ILs), ionic association is expected to be essential in solutions of ILs and to have an important influence on their applications. Although numerous studies have been reported for the ionic association behavior of ILs in solution, quantitative results are quite scarce. Herein, the conductivities of the ILs [C_nmim]Br (n=4, 6, 8, 10, 12), [C₄mim][BF₄], and [C₄mim][PF₆] in various molecular solvents (water, methanol, 1‐propanol, 1‐pentanol, acetonitrile, and acetone) are determined at 298.15 K as a function of IL concentration. The conductance data are analyzed by the Lee–Wheaton conductivity equation in terms of the ionic association constant (K_A) and the limiting molar conductance (Λ_m⁰). Combined with the values for the Br^? anion reported in the literature, the limiting molar conductivities and the transference numbers of the cations and [BF₄]^? and [PF₆]^? anions are calculated in the molecular solvents. It is shown that the alkyl chain length of the cations and type of anion affect the ionic association constants and limiting molar conductivities of the ILs. For a given anion (Br^?), the Λ_m⁰ values decrease with increasing alkyl chain length of the cations in all the molecular solvents, whereas the K_A values of the ILs decrease in organic solvents but increase in water as the alkyl chain length of the cations increases. For the [C₄mim]⁺ cation, the limiting molar conductivities of the ILs decrease in the order Br^?>[BF₄]^?>[PF₆]^?, and their ionic association constants follow the order [BF₄]^?>[PF₆]^?>Br^? in water, acetone, and acetonitrile. Furthermore, and similar to the classical electrolytes, a linear relationship is observed between ln K_A of the ILs and the reciprocal of the dielectric constants of the molecular solvents. The ILs are solvated to a different extent by the molecular solvents, and ionic association is affected significantly by ionic solvation. This information is expected to be useful for the modulation of the IL conductance by the alkyl chain length of the cations, type of anion, and physical properties of the molecular solvents.     

二维多孔铜-间苯二腈配位聚合物用于阴离子交换及客体分子可逆吸附性的研究

The 2D porous copper（Ⅰ） complex with 1,3-dicyanobenzene （DCB）, [Cu（DCB）2]（PF6）（Me2CO） 1, exhibits channels along axis c, in which one molecule acetone and one anion PF6 per formula unit are included respectively. The reversible incorporation of guest acetone and acetonitrile, as well as the anion exchange from PF6^- to BF4^- or CF3SO3^-, was investigated by thermogravimetric （TG） analysis, ^1H NMR spectra and/or infrared absorption spectroscopy. Additionally, the incorporation of benzene and toluene into complex 1 was also discussed. Complex 1 exhibited size selectivity for guest inclusion or anion exchange.     

Werner Complexes with ω‐Dimethylaminoalkyl Substituted Ethylenediamine Ligands: Bifunctional Hydrogen‐Bond‐Donor Catalysts for Highly Enantioselective Michael Additions

The racemic carbonate complex [Co(en)₂O₂CO]⁺ Cl^? (en=1,2‐ethylenediamine) and (S)‐[H₃NCH((CH₂)_nNHMe₂)CH₂NH₃]³⁺ 3 Cl^? (n=1–4) react (water, charcoal, 100 °C) to give [Co(en)₂((S)‐H₂NCH((CH₂)_nNHMe₂)CH₂NH₂)]⁴⁺ 4 Cl^? ( 3 a – d H⁴⁺ 4 Cl^?) as a mixture of Λ/Δ diastereomers that separate on chiral‐phase Sephadex columns. These are treated with NaOH/Na⁺ BAr_f^? (BAr_f=B(3,5‐C₆H₃(CF₃)₂)₄) to give lipophilic Λ‐ and Δ‐ 3 a–d ³⁺ 3 BAr_f^?, which are screened as catalysts (10 mol %) for additions of dialkyl malonates to nitroalkenes. Optimal results are obtained with Λ‐ 3 c ³⁺ 3 BAr_f^? (CH₂Cl₂, ?35 °C; 98–82 % yields and 99–93 % ee for six β‐arylnitroethenes). The monofunctional catalysts Λ‐ and Δ‐[Co(en)₃]³⁺ 3 BAr_f^? give enantioselectivities of <10 % ee with equal loadings of Et₃N. The crystal structure of Δ‐ 3 a H⁴⁺ 4 Cl^? provides a starting point for speculation regarding transition‐state assemblies.     

Aroyleneimidazophenazine: A Sensitive Probe for Detecting CN− Anion and its Solvatochromism Effect

A novel electron‐deficient heteroacene 15H‐pyrazino[2″,3″:3′,4′]pyrrolo[1′,2′:1,2]imidazo[4,5‐b]phenazin‐15‐one ( 1 ) has been successfully synthesized and characterized. Compound 1 can selectively recognize CN^? and F^? over other 10 anions including BF₄^?, PF₆^?, Cl^?, SO₄^2?, NO₃^?, I^?, H₂PO₄^?, ClO₄^?, Ac^?, and Br^? in CHCl₃/DMF mixed solvents with dual responses, including absorption signals and fluorescent “turn‐off” effects. CN^? and F^? can be distinguished by the completely quenched fluorescence (for CN^?) and partially reduced fluorescence (for F^?). Especially, compound 1 exhibits higher sensitivity to CN^? than F^? with the response concentration as low as 5.0 × 10^?6 mol/L. Moreover, compound 1 shows very interesting solvatochromism effect, and the CHCl₃ solution of compound 1 is sensitive to triethylamine, and its emission could change from green to red upon the addition of triethylamine, which is attributed to the n–π intermolecular charge‐transfer interaction.     

Tautomerism and Atropisomerism in Free‐Base (meso)‐Strapped Porphyrins: Static and Dynamic Aspects

We report herein some outstanding examples of atropisomerism and tautomerism in five (meso‐)strapped porphyrins. Porphyrins S0 – S4 have been synthesised, characterised and studied in detail by spectroscopic and spectrometric techniques, and their isomeric purity verified by HPLC analysis. In particular, they exhibit perfectly well‐defined NMR spectra that display distinct patterns depending on their average symmetry at room temperature: C_2v, D_2d, C_2h, C_2v, and D_2h for S0 – S4 , respectively. NH tautomerism was evidenced by variable‐low‐temperature ¹H NMR experiments in [D₂]dichloromethane performed on S0 (Δ${G{{{\ne}\hfill \atop {\rm 298K}\hfill}}}$ =48±1 kJ mol^?1) and S1 (Δ${G{{{\ne}\hfill \atop {\rm 298K}\hfill}}}$ =55±3 kJ mol^?1), which has led to an understanding of the average spectra observed for the five porphyrins at room temperature. On the other hand, S2 and S3 are stable atropisomers at room temperature, easily separated and characterised, as a result of restricted rotation of their strapped bridges due to their high rotational barrier energies. Upon heating to 82 °C, they slowly equilibrate to a thermodynamic ratio of 64:36 in favour of the more stable S2 isomer. This atropisomerisation process was evidenced by ¹H NMR spectroscopy and monitored by HPLC, from which high rotational energy barriers of 115.2 (Δ${G{{{\ne}\hfill \atop {\rm S2}\rightarrow {\rm S3}\hfill}}}$ ) and 116.9 kJ mol^?1 (Δ${G{{{\ne}\hfill \atop {\rm S2}\rightarrow {\rm S3}\hfill}}}$ ) were deduced.     

Expanded‐Ring N‐Heterocyclic Carbenes for the Stabilization of Highly Electrophilic Gold(I) Cations

Strategies for the synthesis of highly electrophilic Au^I complexes from either hydride‐ or chloride‐containing precursors have been investigated by employing sterically encumbered Dipp‐substituted expanded‐ring NHCs (Dipp=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃). Thus, complexes of the type (NHC)AuH have been synthesised (for NHC=6‐Dipp or 7‐Dipp) and shown to feature significantly more electron‐rich hydrides than those based on ancillary imidazolylidene donors. This finding is consistent with the stronger σ‐donor character of these NHCs, and allows for protonation of the hydride ligand. Such chemistry leads to the loss of dihydrogen and to the trapping of the [(NHC)Au]⁺ fragment within a dinuclear gold cation containing a bridging hydride. Activation of the hydride ligand in (NHC)AuH by B(C₆F₅)₃, by contrast, generates a species (at low temperatures) featuring a [HB(C₆F₅)₃]^? fragment with spectroscopic signatures similar to the “free” borate anion. Subsequent rearrangement involves B?C bond cleavage and aryl transfer to the carbophilic metal centre. Under halide abstraction conditions utilizing Na[BAr^f₄] (Ar^f=C₆H₃(CF₃)₂‐3,5), systems of the type [(NHC)AuCl] (NHC=6‐Dipp or 7‐Dipp) generate dinuclear complexes [{(NHC)Au}₂(μ‐Cl)]⁺ that are still electrophilic enough at gold to induce aryl abstraction from the [BAr^f₄]^? counterion.     

Synthesis,Physical Properties,and Anion Recognition of Two Novel Larger Azaacenes: Benzannelated Hexazaheptacene and Benzannelated N,N′‐Dihydrohexazaheptacene

Two novel larger azaacenes with six or ten N atoms in their backbones, benzannelated 9,11,13,22,24,26‐hexazatetrabenzo[a,c,l,n]heptacene ( HATBH , 1 ) and benzannelated 9,26‐dihydro‐9,11,13,22,24,26‐hexaza‐tetrapyrido[3,2‐a: 2′,3′‐c: 3′′,2′′‐l: 2′′′,3′′′‐n]heptacene ( DHATPH, 2 ), have been successfully synthesized in two steps. The theoretical band gaps estimated through DFT calculations for HATBH ( 1 ) and DHATPH ( 2 ) are 1.949 eV and 2.278 eV, which are close to the experimentally obtained optical band gaps (2.14 eV and 2.39 eV). Interestingly, HATBH ( 1 ) can act as efficient anion sensor for F^? and H₂PO₄^?, while DHATPH ( 2 ) selectively responds to F^? among the ten different anions used (F^?, Cl^?, Br^?, I^?, PF₆^?, HSO₄^?, NO₃^?, BF₄^?, AcO^?, and H₂PO₄^?). Our synthetic strategy could offer a promising and easy way to obtain even larger azaacenes.     

Homo‐ and Heterodinuclear Ir and Rh Imine‐functionalized Protic NHC Complexes: Synthetic,Structural Studies,and Tautomerization/Metallotropism Insights

The influence of the potentially chelating imino group of imine‐functionalized Ir and Rh imidazole complexes on the formation of functionalized protic N‐heterocyclic carbene (pNHC) complexes by tautomerization/metallotropism sequences was investigated. Chloride abstraction in [Ir(cod)Cl{C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}] ( 1 a ) (cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene, Dipp=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) with TlPF₆ gave [Ir(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 3 a ⁺[PF₆]^?). Plausible mechanisms for the tautomerization of complex 1 a to 3 a ⁺[PF₆]^? involving C2?H bond activation either in 1 a or in [Ir(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}₂]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 6 a ⁺[PF₆]^?) were postulated. Addition of PR₃ to complex 3 a ⁺[PF₆]^? afforded the eighteen‐valence‐electron complexes [Ir(cod)(PR₃){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 7 a ⁺[PF₆]^? (R=Ph) and 7 b ⁺[PF₆]^? (R=Me)). In contrast to Ir, chloride abstraction from [Rh(cod)Cl{C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}] ( 1 b ) at room temperature afforded [Rh(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}₂]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 6 b ⁺[PF₆]^?) and [Rh(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 3 b ⁺[PF₆]^?) (minor); the reaction yielded exclusively the latter product in toluene at 110 °C. Double metallation of the azole ring (at both the C2 and the N3 atom) was also achieved: [Ir₂(cod)₂Cl{μ‐C₃H₂N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine),κN3}] ( 10 ) and the heterodinuclear complex [IrRh(cod)₂Cl{μ‐C₃H₂N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine),κN3}] ( 12 ) were fully characterized. The structures of complexes 1 b , 3 b ⁺[PF₆]^?, 6 a ⁺[PF₆]^?, 7 a ⁺[PF₆]^?, [Ir(cod){C₃HN₂(DippN=CMe)(DippN=CH)(Me)‐κ²(N3,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 9 ⁺[PF₆]^?), 10? Et₂O ? toluene, [Ir₂(CO)₄Cl{μ‐C₃H₂N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine),κN3}] ( 11 ), and 12? 2 THF were determined by X‐ray diffraction.     

Linear Pyrazole‐bridged Tetra(N‐heterocyclic carbene) Ligands and Their Hexanuclear Silver(I) Complexes

New hybrid ligands are reported that combine two types of popular donor groups within a single linear scaffold, viz., a central pyrazolate bridge and two appended bis(N‐heterocyclic carbene) units; the ligand strands thus provide two potentially tridentate {NCC} compartments. The pyrazole/tetraimidazolium proligands, [H₅L¹](PF₆)₄ and [H₅L²](PF₆)₄ , were synthesized via multi‐step protocols, and the NH prototropy of [H₅L¹](PF₆)₄ was examined by variable temperature (VT) NMR spectroscopy, giving solvent dependent activation parameters (ΔH^? = 27.6 kJ · mol^–1, ΔS^? = –125 J · mol^–1 · K^–1 in [D₃]MeCN; ΔH^? = 40.4 kJ · mol^–1, ΔS^? = –86.9 J · mol^–1 · K^–1 in [D₆]DMSO) that are in the range typical for pyrazoles. Reaction of the proligands with Ag₂O gave hexametallic complexes [Ag₆(L¹)₂](PF₆)₄ and [Ag₆(L²)₂](PF₆)₄ that involve all six potential donor atoms of the ligands, viz. the four C^NHC and two N^pz donors, in metal coordination. X‐ray crystallography revealed a chair‐like central {Ag₆} deck in both complexes but different arrangements of the ligand strands, which goes along with significantly different Ag^I ··· Ag^I distances that indicate more pronounced argentophilic interactions in case of [Ag₆(L¹)₂]^{4 +}.     

Chiral Pyrrolidinium Ionic Liquids with (−)-Borneol Fragment in the Cation – Synthesis,Physicochemical Properties and Application in Diels-Alder Reaction

A series of chiral pyrrolidinium salts containing (1 S)-endo-(−)-born-2-yloxymethyl substituent in the structure of the cation and six different anions: chloride, tetrafluoroborate [BF₄]⁻, hexafluorophosphate [PF₆]⁻, trifluoromethanesulfonate [OTf]⁻, bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide [NTf₂]⁻, bis(pentafluoroethylsulfonyl)imide [NPf₂]⁻ and perfluorobutanesulfonate [C₄FS]⁻ were efficiently prepared and extensively characterized. The enantiomeric purity of them was confirmed by NMR analysis with a chemical shift reagent. All salts were characterized with the specific rotation, the solubility in commonly used solvents, thermal properties, including phase transition temperatures and thermal stability. Salts with [PF₆]⁻, [C₄FS]⁻, [NTf₂]⁻ and [NPf₂]⁻ anions were classified as chiral ionic liquids (CILs). Moreover, salts with [NTf₂]⁻ and [NPf₂]⁻ anions were in the liquid state at room temperature and below. Therefore, density and dynamic viscosity, the surface tension and the contact angle on three different surfaces were also measured for them. Additionally, these chiral ionic liquids were tested as solvents in Diels-Alder reaction.     

Rapid Preparation of Silsesquioxane‐Based Ionic Liquids

Three new hybrid ionic liquids (ILs) based on cage silsesquioxane (SQ) were rapidly prepared in high yields from octa(mercaptopropyl)silsesquioxane and 1‐allyl‐3‐methylimidazolium salts (Br^?, BF₄^?, PF₆^?) through the photochemical thiol–ene reaction. These SQ‐based ILs exhibited low glass transition temperatures and good thermal stability. The unique amphiphilic nature of these hybrid ILs cause them to self‐assemble into perfect vesicles with “yolk–shell” structures, in which cages formed the “yolk” due to their aggregation and outer anions formed the “shell”.     

Dihydrogen Catalysis of the Reversible Formation and Cleavage of CH and NH Bonds of Aminopyridinate Ligands Bound to (η5‐C5Me5)IrIII

This study focuses on a series of cationic complexes of iridium that contain aminopyridinate (Ap) ligands bound to an (η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Ir^III fragment. The new complexes have the chemical composition [Ir(Ap)(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)]⁺, exist in the form of two isomers ( 1⁺ and 2⁺ ) and were isolated as salts of the BAr_F^? anion (BAr_F=B[3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃]₄). Four Ap ligands that differ in the nature of their bulky aryl substituents at the amido nitrogen atom and pyridinic ring were employed. In the presence of H₂, the electrophilicity of the Ir^III centre of these complexes allows for a reversible prototropic rearrangement that changes the nature and coordination mode of the aminopyridinate ligand between the well‐known κ²‐N,N′‐bidentate binding in 1⁺ and the unprecedented κ‐N,η³‐pseudo‐allyl‐coordination mode in isomers 2⁺ through activation of a benzylic C?H bond and formal proton transfer to the amido nitrogen atom. Experimental and computational studies evidence that the overall rearrangement, which entails reversible formation and cleavage of H?H, C?H and N?H bonds, is catalysed by dihydrogen under homogeneous conditions.