SYNTHESIS OF TRIBLOCK COPOLYMERS OF STYRENE AND ISOPRENE BY A NITROXIDE-MEDIATED LIVING FREE RADICAL POLYMERIZATION

The controlled free radical polymerization of styrene and isoprene initiated with benzoyl peroxide (BPO) in the presence of 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl piperidine-N-oxyl (TEMPO) at 125 ℃ were performed. The obtained polyisoprene and polystyrene homopolymers served as macroinitiators for block copolymerization of isoprene and styrene to synthesize poly(styrene-b-isoprene) and poly(isoprene-b-styrene) diblock copolymers. Diblock copolymers with well-defined structures as well as controlled and narrow molecular weight distribution wereobtained from the lower-mass polystyrene and polyisoprene homopolymers. These copolymers were found to be active as macroinitiators in the synthesis of the poly(styrene-b-isoprene-b-styrene) and poly(isoprene-b-styrene-b-isoprene) triblock copolymers. 1H-NMR spectroscopy and gel permeation chromatography (GPC) were used for the investigation of polymer strucmre, molecular weight and polydispersity (PD).     

Multiblock copolymers of styrene and isoprene. I. Synthesis and characterization

An anionic polymerization procedure for preparing multiblock copolymers of styrene and isoprene is described. The process is based on the initial specific incorporation of isoprene when mixtures of styrene and isoprene are polymerized with butyllithium in hydrocarbon solution. As examples, linear (AB)₃ block copolymers have been prepared by interrupting styrene polymerization by step additions of isoprene at times programmed according to the reactivity ratios and the rate constants for styrene and isoprene propagations. The products were characterized by means of osmometry, light scattering, gel-permeation chromatography, and density-gradient ultracentrifugation. The analyses showed that the multiblock copolymers are free from polymeric impurities and reasonably homogeneous in molecular weight and composition. The polystyrene segment lengths were analyzed by means of GPC after the oxidative degradation of the polyisoprene moieties in the copolymers. The results suggest that the polyisoprene blocks contain a nonnegligible amount of styrene but that this monomer is incorporated as very short segments. On the other hand the polystyrene blocks produced at the end of the copolymerizations appear to have narrow molecular weight distributions.     

Dynamic mechanical relaxation behavior of block copolymers at high temperatures

We carried out dynamic mechanical measurements to investigate three different examples of block copolymers: styrene–isoprene diblock copolymers and styrene–butadiene–styrene and styrene–(styrene butadiene)–styrene triblock copolymers. Isochronal and isothermal measurements of the real and imaginary parts of the complex shear modulus were performed over wide ranges of temperature and frequency. The measurements showed the presence of an additional relaxation process appearing at temperatures higher than those of the glass relaxation of the polystyrene phase, which has been misinterpreted by some authors as an order–disorder transition. The frequency dependence revealed that this process was a relaxation process and did not belong to a first‐order transition. Moreover, the influence of crosslinking via dicumylperoxide was measured, and we constructed complete master curves to confirm the presence of two relaxation processes. The high‐temperature relaxation process was strongly suppressed by crosslinking. Therefore, it was possible to detect the glass relaxation process of the polystyrene phase in a precise manner. The results were compared with those of homopolymers. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 39: 2198–2206, 2001     

Facile one‐pot synthesis of linear and radial block copolymers of styrene and isoprene through a novel coupling agent by living anionic polymerization

A new methodology is successfully used for the concurrent synthesis of three different copolymers; diblock, triblock, and three‐armed star‐block copolymers of styrene and isoprene via the living anionic polymerization with control over the molecular weight and weight fractions of each block. The room temperature polymerization process has resulted in the well defined linear and radial block copolymers, when the living di‐block of poly(styrene‐b‐isoprene) was coupled using cheap and readily available malonyl chloride as a novel coupling agent giving nearly 100% yield. The resulting block copolymers have narrow polydispersity index (PDI = 1.01–1.09) with a good agreement between the calculated and the observed molecular weights. The results are further supported by fractionation of the block copolymers by reversed‐phase temperature gradient interaction chromatography (RP‐TGIC) technique followed by size exclusion chromatography (SEC). © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 48: 2636–2641, 2010     

(Star PS)-block-(Linear PI)-block-(Star PS) Triblock Copolymers – Thermoplastic Elastomers with Complex Branched Architectures

Polystyrene-block-polyisoprene-block-polystyrene triblock copolymers were synthesized with star-shaped branching in the polystyrene phase. The block copolymers were formed through sequential anionic polymerization by first synthesizing linear polystyrene, followed by star coupling using 4-(chlorodimethylsilyl)styrene, then the polymerization of isoprene, followed by difunctional coupling with dichlorodimethylsilane. The polymerization was followed by gel permeation chromatography and the resulting copolymers were characterized by ¹H NMR spectroscopy to examine the polyisoprene microstructure.     

The preparation and properties of BAB block copolymers based on polyethylene sulphide and polyisoprene

Block copolymers of ethylene sulphide (B) and isoprene (A) have been prepared by anionic synthesis using alkali metal complexes of naphthalene as initiator. Two series of block copolymers have been synthesized, one (based on sodium naphthalenide as initiator) having high molecular weights and the other (based on lithium naphthalenide) having low molecular weights.Physical properties of the block copolymers as a function of composition, molecular weight and polyisoprene microstructure have been studied. Polymers containing high molecular weight polyethylene sulphide sequences were difficult to process without degradation. By lowering the molecular weight of the polyethylene sulphide segment, block copolymers of improved processibility were obtained.The centre block polyisoprene microstructure has been varied from 100% 1,2/3,4 configuration to 80% 1,4 configuration by preparing a “seed” polymer in tetrahydrofuran followed by solvent removal and replacement by hexane. Changes in microstructure affect low temperature flexibility, resilience and tensile strength of the block copolymer.The BAB block copolymers are biphasic and exhibit elastomeric properties with improved network stability compared with polystyrene-polybutadiene-polystyrene ABA block copolymers.     

Anionic polymerization and copolymerization in heterogeneous systems on surfaces with aromatic structure

Methacrylaldehyde, methyl methacrylate, methacrylonitrile, styrene and isoprene readily polymerize on potassium–graphite inclusion compounds in ethereal and hydrocarbon solvents. The structure of polymethacrylaldehyde, poly(methyl methacrylate), and polyisoprene as well as the composition of styrene–acrylonitrile and styrene–isoprene copolymers have been investigated. The copolymers have a high content of styrene units which is interpreted in terms of selective adsorption of styrene on the initiator surface.     

Poly(acrylate‐b‐styrene‐b‐isobutylene‐b‐styrene‐b‐acrylate) Block Copolymers via Carbocationic and Atom Transfer Radical Polymerizations

A series of polyacrylate‐polystyrene‐polyisobutylene‐polystyrene‐polyacrylate (X‐PS‐PIB‐PS‐X) pentablock terpolymers (X=poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA), poly(butyl acrylate) (PBA), or poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)) was prepared from poly (styrene‐b‐isobutylene‐b‐styrene) (PS‐PIB‐PS) block copolymers (BCPs) using either a Cu(I)Cl/1,1,4,7,7‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) or Cu(I)Cl/tris[2‐(dimethylamino)ethyl]amine (Me₆TREN) catalyst system. The PS‐PIB‐PS BCPs were prepared by quasiliving carbocationic polymerization of isobutylene using a difunctional initiator, followed by the sequential addition of styrene, and were used as macroinitiators for the atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of methyl acrylate (MA), n‐butyl acrylate (BA), or methyl methacrylate (MMA). The ATRP of MA and BA proceeded in a controlled fashion using either a Cu(I)Cl/PMDETA or Cu(I)Cl/Me₆TREN catalyst system, as evidenced by a linear increase in molecular weight with conversion and low PDIs. The polymerization of MMA was less controlled. ¹H‐NMR spectroscopy was used to elucidate pentablock copolymer structure and composition. The thermal stabilities of the pentablock copolymers were slightly less than the PS‐PIB‐PS macroinitiators due to the presence of polyacrylate or polymethacrylate outer block segments. DSC analysis of the pentablock copolymers showed a plurality of glass transition temperatures, indicating a phase separated material.     

Glass transition temperatures of ABA poly(styrene-b-isoprene) block copolymers by differential scanning calorimetry

The glass transition behavior of two sets of ABA poly(styrene-b-isoprene) block copolymers was examined by differential scanning calorimetry. In one series, the triblock copolymers had different total molecular weights and the same (30 wt %) polyisoprene content, in the other, the molecular weight was constant (30,000 g/mol) and the elastomer content was the variable. For all triblock copolymers studied, the data show an inward shift for the glass transition temperatures T_g of the corresponding homopolymers. This shift increases for the rigid-phase T_g as the polystyrene block length decreases. Depending on their molecular characteristics, two, three, or only one T_g were found. The third T_g was interpreted in terms of the existence of an interphase. Some of these conclusions could be confirmed by transmission electron microscopy.     

Synthesis and characterization of polystyrene‐b‐poly (1,2‐isoprene‐ran‐3,4‐isoprene) block copolymers with azobenzene side groups

Polystyrene‐b‐poly(1,2‐isoprene‐ran‐3,4‐isoprene) block copolymers with azobenzene side groups were synthesized by the esterification of azobenzene acid chloride with polystyrene‐b‐hydroxylated poly(1,2‐isoprene‐ran‐3,4‐isopenre) block copolymers for creating new photochromic materials. The resulting block copolymers with azobenzene side groups were characterized for structural, thermal, and morphological properties. IR and NMR spectroscopies confirmed that the polymers obtained had the expected structures. Differential scanning calorimetric measurements by heating runs clearly showed the glass transitions of polystyrene and polyisoprene main chains and two distinct first‐order transitions at temperatures of azobenzene side groups around 48 and 83 °C. The microstructure of these block copolymer films was investigated using both transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and near‐field optical microscopy (NOM). TEM images revealed typical microphase‐separated morphologies such as sphere, cylinder, and lamellar structures. The domain spacing of microphase‐separated cylindrical morphology in the NOM image agreed with that of the TEM results. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 2406–2414, 2002     

Synthesis of hybrid dendritic‐linear block copolymers with dendritic initiators prepared by convergent living anionic polymerization

Hybrid dendritic‐linear block copolymers were made in one‐pot by convergent living anionic polymerization. Dendritic polystyrene macroinitiators were synthesized by slowly adding a mixture of either vinylbenzyl chloride (VBC) or 4‐(chlorodimethylsilyl)styrene (CDMSS) and styrene (1 : 10 molar ratio of coupling agent to styrene) to a solution of living polystyryllithium. The addition was ceased prior to the addition of a stoichiometric amount of coupling agent to retain a living chain end. To the living dendritically branched polystyrene was then added either styrene or isoprene to polymerize a linear block from the dendritic polystyrene. The resulting copolymers were characterized by gel permeation chromatography coupled with multiangle laser light scattering (GPC‐MALLS), which clearly demonstrated the formation of diblock copolymers. The diblock copolymers were further characterized by ¹H NMR, which showed the presence of the two blocks in the case of dendritic polystyrene‐block‐linear polyisoprene. The measurement of intrinsic viscosity showed that the dilute solution properties of the block copolymers are greatly influenced by the dendritic portion. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 39: 152–161, 2001     

Analysis of glass transition and relaxation processes of low molecular weight polystyrene-b-polyisoprene diblock copolymers

The objective of this study is to analyze the glass transition temperature and relaxation processes of low molecular weight polystyrene-block-polyisoprene diblock copolymers with different compositions, synthesized via anionic polymerization. Thermal properties were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic-mechanical thermal analysis, while the morphologies at room temperature were investigated by transmission electron microscopy and small-angle X-ray scattering. The χN values indicate that the diblock copolymers lie near the weak segregation regime. Three different experimental techniques were applied to determine the dynamic properties, i.e., linear viscoelastic shear oscillations, creep recovery experiments, and dielectric spectroscopy. The rheological experiments were performed above the order–disorder transition temperature where the diblock copolymers behave like a Maxwell fluid. Our results indicate that the presence of the polyisoprene segments strongly influences the monomeric friction coefficient and the tendency to form entanglements above the order–disorder temperature. Consequently, the zero-shear rate viscosity of a diblock copolymer is much lower than the zero-shear rate viscosity of the neat polystyrene block (the polystyrene precursor of the polymerization procedure). Dielectric spectroscopy enables the analysis of relaxation processes below the glass transition of the polystyrene microphase. Frequency sweeps indicate the dynamic glass transition of the polyisoprene blocks, which are partly mixed with the polystyrene blocks, which are always the majority component in the block copolymers of this study.     

Double hydrophilic block copolymers of sodium(2‐sulfamate‐3‐carboxylate)isoprene and ethylene oxide

Poly(sodium(2‐sulfamate‐3‐carboxylate)isoprene)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(ethylene oxide)‐b‐poly(sodium(2‐sulfamate‐1‐carboxylate)isoprene)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide) double hydrophilic block copolymers were prepared by selective post polymerization reaction of the polyisoprene block, of poly(isoprene‐b‐ethylene oxide) diblocks or poly(ethylene oxide‐b‐isoprene‐b‐ethylene oxide) triblock precursors, with N‐chlorosulfonyl isocyanate. The precursors were synthesized by anionic polymerization high vacuum techniques and had narrow molecular weight distributions and predictable molecular weights and compositions. The resulting double hydrophilic block copolymers were characterized by FTIR and potentiometric titrations in terms of the incorporated functional groups. Their properties in aqueous solutions were studied by viscometry and dynamic light scattering. The latter techniques revealed a complex dilute solution behavior of the novel block copolymers, resulting from the polyelectrolyte character of the functionalized PI block and showing a dependence on solution ionic strength and pH. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 606–613, 2006     

Surface properties of styrene–ethylene oxide block copolymers

Hydrophobic–hydrophilic block copolymers were prepared by “living” anionic polymerization. They consist of polystyrene and poly(ethylene oxide) blocks, and are soluble in water. Their interfacial properties were investigated, employing aqueous solutions. The block copolymers lowered the surface tension of water in analogy with the low molecular weight surfactants such as sodium lauryl sulfate and heptaethylene oxide n-dodecyl ether. Their aqueous solutions exhibited solubilization properties differing from those of polyethylene glycol. Therefore, it is thought that the polystyrene blocks produce solubilization phenomena. In samples of the same styrene content, the precipitation temperature of a high molecular weight copolymer in water was lower than that of a low molecular weight copolymer at the same concentration in the same solvent. The surface tension and precipitation temperature of aqueous solutions seem to be influenced by molecular weight and composition.     

Synthesis of well‐defined polymers end‐functionalized with crosslinkable aziridine groups by living anionic polymerization

Well‐defined end‐functionalized polystyrene, poly(α‐methylstyrene), and polyisoprene with polymerizable aziridine groups were synthesized by the termination reactions of the anionic living polymers of styrene, α‐methylstyrene, and isoprene with 1‐[2‐(4‐chlorobutoxy)ethyl]aziridine in tetrahydrofuran at ?78 °C. The resulting polymers possessed the predicted molecular weights and narrow molecular weight distributions (weight‐average molecular weight/number‐average molecular weight < 1.1) as well as aziridine terminal moieties. The cationic ring‐opening polymerization of the ω‐monofunctionalized polystyrene having an aziridinyl group with Et₃OBF₄ gave the polymacromonomer, whereas the α,ω‐difunctional polystyrene underwent crosslinking reactions to afford an insoluble gel. Crosslinking products were similarly obtained by the reaction of the α,ω‐diaziridinyl polystyrene with poly(acrylic acid)‐co‐poly(butyl acrylate). © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 4126–4135, 2005     

Facile syntheses,morphologies, and optical absorptions of P3HT coil‐rod‐coil triblock copolymers

Here we report syntheses, photophysical properties, and morphologies of a series of coil‐rod‐coil ABA triblock copolymers containing highly regioregular poly(3‐hexylthiophene) (P3HT) as the central rod block. A new methodology, based on the coupling reaction between living polymeric anions [polystyrene, polyisoprene, and poly(methyl methacrylate)] and aldehyde terminated P3HT, was successfully developed to synthesize the triblock copolymers with low polydispersities. This coupling reaction was effective for building blocks with a variety of molecular weights; therefore, a good variation in compositions of the triblock copolymers could be feasibly achieved. The non‐P3HT coil segments and the solvents were found to exhibit noticeable effects on morphologies of the spin‐coated thin films. Attachment of the coil segments to P3HT did not change the optical absorption of the P3HT segment as the block copolymers were dissolved in solution regardless the chemical structure and the molecular weight of the coil segment. Interestingly, different UV–vis absorption behaviors were observed for the spin‐coated thin films of the block copolymers, which closely related to their morphologies. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 48: 3311–3322, 2010     

Synthesis and stability of linear and star polymers containing [C60] fullerene

Linear and symmetric star block copolymers of styrene and isoprene containing [C₆₀] fullerene were synthesized by anionic polymerization and appropriate linking postpolymerization chemistry. In all block copolymers, the C₆₀ was connected to the terminal polyisoprene (PI) block. The composition of the copolymers was kept constant (～30% wt PI), whereas the molecular weight of the diblock chains was varied. The polymers were characterized with a number of techniques, including size exclusion chromatography, membrane osmometry, and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. The combined characterization results showed that the synthetic procedures followed led to well‐defined materials. However, degradation of the fractionated star‐shaped copolymers was observed after storage for 2 months at 4 °C, whereas the nonfractionated material was stable. To further elucidate the reasons for this degradation, we prepared and studied a four‐arm star copolymer with the polystyrene part connected to C₆₀ and a six‐arm star homopolymer of styrene. These polymers as well as linear copolymers end‐capped, through ? N<, with C₆₀ were stable. Possible reasons are discussed. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 39: 2494–2507, 2001     

Random low vinyl styrene-isoprene copolymers

The present work is to the syntheses and characterization of random, low vinyl copolymers containing styrene and isoprene (SIR’s). The content of these SIR’s ranged from 10% styrene/90% isoprene to 60% styrene/40% isoprene, and all were soluble in hexane solvent. The anionic polymerization of these SIR’s was initiated by a catalyst system of various sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS) to n-butyllithium (n-BuLi) ratios. The SDBS allowed for styrene to become randomly incorporated onto the polyisoprene chain without any increase in the 3,4-unit of the isoprene. The glass transition temperature of the resulting polymers could be controlled by the styrene content and microstructure (blocky versus random) in the polymer chain. Kinetic data confirmed that styrene and isoprene have similar reaction kinetics. NMR and ozonolysis confirmed that random, low vinyl SIR’s were indeed being synthesized. The unique features of this system are that it does not metallate the polymers as was seen in the previous publication using the sodium and potassium alkoxides. Molecular weight differences due to SDBS are discussed. Finally, rubber process analyzer (RPA) results were presented for various styrenes content SIR’s.     

Blends of poly(2,6–dimethyl–1,4–phenylene oxide) with styrene copolymers

Binary blends of poly(2,6–dimethyl–1,4–phenylene oxide) (PPE) with various styrene copolymers were investigated. Poly(styrene–co–acrylonitrile) (SAN), poly[styrene–co–(methyl methacrylate)] (SMMA), poly[styrene–co–(acrylic acid)] (SAA) and poly[styrene–co–(maleic anhydride)] (SMA) are only miscible with PPE when the amount of comonomer is rather small. From calculated binary interaction densities it can be concluded that the strong repulsion between PPE and comonomer limits miscibility. In blends of PPE with SAN, as well as with ABS, the inter-facial tension between the blend components is significantly reduced upon addition of polystyrene–block–poly–(methyl methacrylate) diblock copolymers (PS–b–PMMA) and polystyrene–block–poly (ethylene–co–butylene)–block–poly–(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymers (PS–b–PEB–b–PMMA). They show a profound influence on morphology, phase adhesion and mechanical blend properties.     

Styrene and isoprene friction factors in styrene–isoprene matrices

Monomeric friction factors, Ξ, for polystyrene (PS), polyisoprene (PI), and a polystyrene–polyisoprene (SI) diblock copolymer have been determined as a function of temperature in four poly(styrene-b-isoprene-b-styrene-b-isoprene) tetrablock copolymer matrices. The Rouse model has been used to calculate the friction factors from tracer diffusion coefficients measured by forced Rayleigh scattering. Within the experimental temperature range the tetrablock copolymers are disordered, allowing for measurement of the diffusion coefficient in matrices with average compositions determined by the tetrablock copolymers (23, 42, 60, and 80% styrene by volume). Remarkably, for a given matrix composition the styrene and isoprene friction factors are essentially equivalent. Furthermore, at a constant interval from the system glass transition temperature, T_g, all of the friction factors (obtained from homopolymer, diblock copolymer, and tetrablock copolymer dynamics) agree to within an order of magnitude. This is in marked contrast to results for miscible polymer blends, where the individual components generally have distinct composition dependences and magnitudes at constant T − T_g. The homopolymer friction factors in the tetrablock matrices were systematically slightly higher than those of the diblock, which in turn were slightly higher than those of the homopolymers in their respective melts, when all compared at constant T − T_g. This is attributed to the local spatial distribution of styrene and isoprene segments in the tetrablocks, which presents a nonuniform free energy surface to the tracer molecules. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 36: 3079–3086, 1998