亚临界水萃取-固相萃取联用技术对沉积物中有机氯农药的萃取研究

研究了用亚临界水萃取-固相萃取(SBwE-SPE)联用技术萃取湖泊沉积物中的有机氯农药。以活性炭纤维作为固相萃取剂,对亚临界水萃取物进行净化处理。在125℃下亚临界水萃取40min,对六氯环己烷(HCH)的四种异构体：(α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-δHCH,-HCH)和六氯代苯(HCB)的萃取回收率在70％～95％之间。该方法具有简单、快捷、只使用少量有机溶剂等优点。     

土壤中不同极性污染物的亚临界水选择性萃取

研究了用亚临界水萃取技术选择性萃取土壤中3种不同极性的污染物:2,4-二氯酚(2,4-DCP)、4-氯联苯(4-PCB)和六氯苯(HCB)。研究了在不同温度下亚临界水对分析物的萃取效率。125℃时,萃取物主要是2,4-DCP;250℃时,主要萃取4-PCB和HCB。同时,研究了亚临界水萃取时间、萃取体积对3种物质的萃取效率的影响,确定了土壤中HCB的最佳亚临界水萃取条件为萃取水体积4mL,萃取时间75m in,萃取温度250℃。本方法用于实际样品中的HCB萃取,通过改变萃取温度,可以去除其它污染物对HCB测定的影响,测定结果与索氏提取-GC分析结果吻合较好。与USEPA标准方法8081A相比,本方法可以显著缩短萃取时间、简化净化步骤及减少有机试剂的用量。     

同时亚临界水萃取与固相萃取从河流沉积物中分离有机氯化合物

静态亚临界水萃取中加入固相萃取剂对河流沉积物中4种有机氯化合物(2-氯酚、2,4,6-三氯酚、五氯酚、六氯苯)进行了同时萃取。与离线亚临界水萃取-固相萃取方法相比,分析物的萃取回收率均有提高,且受亚临界水萃取罐冷却程度的影响较小。以活性炭纤维(ACF)为固相萃取剂,在160℃时,0.050 g的ACF和4.0 mL水对0.500 g的加标沉积物样品中的2-氯酚(2-CP),2,4,6-三氯酚(246-TCP),五氯酚(PCP)和六氯苯(HCB)的萃取效率比离线亚临界水萃取-固相萃取的回收率均有所提高,萃取回收率受萃取罐冷却温度影响较小。方法特别适合于高含量的沉积物样品萃取。该方法与气相色谱检测联用,分析了长江镇江段沉积物中4种有机氯化合物的含量,结果与美国环保署(USEPA)标准方法所得的结果吻合。     

亚临界水萃取及气相色谱-串联质谱法检测红茶中多种农药残留

建立了亚临界水萃取及气相色谱-串联质谱(GC-MS/MS)检测红茶中21种有机氯和拟除虫菊酯农药残留的方法。在萃取压力为5 MPa条件下,样品经150 ℃的亚临界水提取15 min后,将目标物转移至丙酮-正己烷(1:1, v/v)中,经ENVI-Carb固相萃取净化小柱净化,DB-5毛细管气相色谱柱分离,在多反应监测(MRM)模式下进行MS/MS检测,基质匹配溶液内标法定量。各目标物在5.0～320.0 μg/L范围内线性关系良好,相关系数均大于0.99,其定量限(信噪比(S/N)＞10)为50 ng/g,检出限(S/N＞3)为10 ng/g。茶叶基质中添加50、100和200 ng/g的标准品时,21种农药的回收率为70.18%～119.98%,相对标准偏差(RSD)为5.01%～11.76%。该方法的灵敏度、准确度和精密度均符合农药残留测定的技术要求,适用于红茶中有机氯和拟除虫菊酯农药残留的检测。     

亚临界水萃取-酶抑制法快速检测蔬菜中的灭多威农药

本文研究了蔬菜中灭多威农药的亚临界水萃取-酶抑制法快速检测技术.研究表明,在萃取温度70℃,萃取时间5 min,提取液的pH为8.0,提取液体积为5 mL的条件下,灭多威有最高萃取效率.将本法分别应用于测定模拟样品和实际样品,结果表明亚临界水萃取的萃取效率和精密度都要高于国家标准方法中的手摇振荡萃取.     

亚临界水萃取技术应用于环境样品预处理的研究

对近几年来亚临界水萃取（Sub-critical water extraction,SCWE）技术的研究进行了综述,介绍了亚临界水萃取技术的原理、特点及其在环境分析中的应用。与传统的样品预处理方法和一些新的样品预处理技术（如微波辅助萃取）相比,SCWE可以不使用有机溶剂,对环境造成的污染较小,是一种绿色的样品预处理技术。SCWE在萃取能力、回收率、精密度等方面具有相当的可靠性。方法具有较高的选择性分离预富集某些有机污染物（如多环芳烃等）的特点（引述文献22篇）。     

亚临界水萃取及液相色谱-串联质谱法检测猪肉中β-受体激动剂与氯霉素残留

建立了亚临界水萃取及液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)检测猪肉中β-受体激动剂和氯霉素的方法。样品酶解后,经亚临界水萃取,C18粉未净化,目标物经Agilent XDB-C18柱(4.6 mm×50 mm,1.8μm)分离,采用液相色谱-串联质谱法多反应监测(MRM)模式检测,基质匹配溶液内标法定量。优化条件下,沙丁胺醇和莱克多巴胺在1.0～32.0μg/L范围内线性关系良好,其定量下限(S/N>10)为0.5 ng/g,检出限(S/N>3)为0.25 ng/g;克伦特罗和氯霉素在0.2～6.4μg/L范围内线性关系良好,其定量下限(S/N>10)为0.1 ng/g,检出限(S/N>3)为0.05 ng/g,相关系数均大于0.99。猪肉基质在3个加标水平下,回收率为79.2%～113.6%,相对标准偏差(RSDs)为3.2%～12.0%。该方法的灵敏度、准确度和精密度均符合兽药残留测定的技术要求,适用于猪肉中β-受体激动剂和氯霉素残留的检测。     

食品中有机磷酸酯阻燃剂检测技术的研究进展

有机磷酸酯(OPEs)是阻燃剂和塑化剂的主要原料,通常以添加形式存在于各种材料中,在生产和使用过程中伴随磨损和挥发易释放到环境中,现已成为新兴污染物。因为该类化合物的神经毒性、致癌性、破坏内分泌系统以及生殖系统等毒性,食品样品中OPEs的检测成为近年来关注的热点。该文重点围绕食品基质中OPEs检测存在的含量低、本底干扰严重、缺乏灵敏可靠分析方法等问题,对OPEs类化合物的性质、样品前处理、检测技术、质量控制等进行了全面评述。首先总结了30余种常见OPEs类化合物的类型、官能团、极性、沸点等理化性质,对可能的前处理和检测技术进行了理论分析;其次梳理了加速溶剂萃取(ASE)、基质固相分散萃取(MSPD)、微波辅助萃取(MAE)、超声辅助萃取(UAE)、QuEChERS、固相萃取(SPE)、凝胶渗透色谱(GPC)、分散固相萃取(d-SPE)等前处理方法在食品中OPEs化合物分析中的特点,其中UAE和QuEChERS结合多步净化能够有效降低高脂类食品的基质效应,具有良好应用前景;此外比较了气相色谱和液相色谱在分离和检测方面的优缺点,比较已有文献的检出限、回收率等数据;概括了标准品和内标物来源、过程污染与基质效应的产生原因和预防措施;最后对高分辨质谱筛查和鉴别OPEs未知代谢物,以及相关分析方法趋势进行了展望。     

亚临界水萃取在分析化学中的应用

亚临界水的介电常数ε随温度增加而减少,在250℃时ε值只有27（介于甲醇与乙醇之间）,比常温常压下下水的介电常数ε＝80下降了许多。亚临界水极性的减弱,使它对中极性和非极性有机化合物的溶解度大大增加,可以定量萃取出固体试样中的多环芳烃和多氯联苯化合物。另外,亚临界水也可以作为反相高效液体色谱的洗脱液。     

加速溶剂萃取-同位素质谱分析土壤水的氢氧同位素

土壤水是水循环的重要组成部分,其氢氧同位素组成在生态学、环境学、水文学等领域有着广泛应用。不同的提取水方法存在较大偏差,因此本研究建立了加速溶剂萃取(ASE)提取-同位素质谱(IRMS)分析土壤水中氢氧同位素的方法。ASE提取土壤水的条件是:萃取溶剂二氯甲烷,萃取温度100℃,萃取压力10.3 MPa,静态萃取时间10 min,重复提取3次,循环次数分别为4,4和3次,合并提取土壤水并经活性炭固相萃取柱(SPE)净化后,利用同位素比质谱分析土壤水的氢氧同位素组成。与过注水相比,提取土壤水的δD增加2.12‰~4.58‰,δ18O增加-0.17‰~0.93‰,氢氧同位素的分析精度分别为0.89‰和0.37‰。     

Analysis of insecticides in honey by liquid chromatography-ion trap-mass spectrometry: comparison of different extraction procedures

The feasibility of different extraction procedures was tested and compared for the determination of 12 organophosphorus and carbamates insecticides in honey samples. In this sense, once the samples were pre-treated - essentially dissolved in hot water by stirring - and before they could be analyzed by liquid chromatography-ion trap-second stage mass spectrometry (LC-MS(2)), four different approaches were studied for the extraction step: QuEChERS, solid-phase extraction (SPE), pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) and solid-phase microextraction (SPME). The main aim of this work was to maximise the sensitivity of pesticides and to minimise the presence of interfering compounds in the extract. All pesticides were linear in the range from CC(β) to 1000× CC(β) for the four extraction methods (three orders of magnitude). Detection capabilities (CC(β)) were 0.024-1.155 mg kg(-1) with QuEChERS, 0.010-0.646 mg kg(-1) with SPE, 0.007-0.595 mg kg(-1) with PLE, and 0.001-0.060 mg kg(-1) with SPME. All the target compounds could be recovered by any of the methods, at a CC(β) fortification level ranged from 28 to 90% for the SPME. In comparison, the PLE method was the most efficient extraction method with recoveries from 82 to 104%. It was followed by the QuEChERS method with recoveries between 78 and 101% and the SPE method with recoveries between 72 and 100%. The repeatability expressed as relative standard deviation (RSDs) was below 20% for all the pesticides by any of the tested extraction methods. Results obtained applying the four extraction techniques to real honey samples are analogous.     

Multiresidue determination of 77 pesticides in textiles by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

A simple and efficient method for multiple determination of 77 pesticides, including one organonitrogen, eight carbamate, 12 pyrethroid, 26 organochloride, 30 organophosphorous compounds, in textiles is developed. Six representative textiles are chosen as test samples. Extraction using hexane-ethyl acetate (1:1) assisted by ultrasonic processor is carried out twice, followed by clean-up using solid-phase extraction on a florisil column. The final solution is analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and 77 pesticides are determined. This method is highly sensitive, selective, and reproducible, with a broad linear range and reliable accuracy. Six blank samples are spiked with 0.50 and 2.00 mg/kg of the 77 pesticides, and the corresponding recoveries are between 64.5% and 99.1%; the precisions range from 4.04% to 14.78%; and the minimum detection limits of this method are 0.02-0.20 mg/kg.     

快速滤过型净化结合气相色谱-串联质谱法同时检测茶叶中10种拟除虫菊酯农药残留

建立了快速滤过型净化(m-PFC)结合气相色谱-串联质谱(GC-MS/MS)测定茶叶中10种拟除虫菊酯类农药残留的方法。比较了采用不同提取溶剂(乙腈、丙酮和乙酸乙酯)和不同提取方式(不加水浸泡和加水浸泡)时10种农药的提取效率;比较了2种QuEChERS净化管和m-PFC柱对茶叶提取液的净化效果和农药残留的回收率。结果表明,茶叶样品不加水浸泡,用乙腈提取效果最好;m-PFC柱对茶叶提取液净化效果良好,而且能保证较高的农药回收率。10种拟除虫菊酯农药在相应的范围内有良好的线性关系,相关系数(R²)大于0.998 0; 10种农药在4个水平添加下的回收率为87.5%～111.3%, RSD为2.1%～8.9%。方法的检出限为0.001～0.015 mg/kg,定量限为0.003～0.05 mg/kg。利用该方法检测市售50例茶叶样品中10种拟除虫菊酯农药的残留,检出率为48%,但农药残留量均在国家标准限量值以下。与传统QuEChERS法和固相萃取法相比,该方法具有操作简单、准确度和精密度良好等优点,为多种拟除虫菊酯类农药在茶叶中的残留测定提供了快速检测的新方法。     

Selective solid-phase extraction using molecularly imprinted polymer for the analysis of polar organophosphorus pesticides in water and soil samples

An analytical methodology for the analysis of four polar organophophorus pesticides (monocrotophos, mevinphos, phosphamidon, omethoate) in water and soil samples incorporating a molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction (MISPE) process using a monocrotophos-imprinted polymer was developed. Binding study demonstrated that the polymer showed excellent affinity and high selectivity to monocrotophos. The MISPE procedure including the clean-up step to remove any interferences was optimized. The accuracy and selectivity of the MISPE process developed were verified using a non-imprinted (blank) polymer and a classical ENVI-18 cartridge as the SPE matrix during control experiments. The use of MISPE improved the accuracy and precision of the GC method and lowered the limit of detection. The recoveries of four polar organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) extracted from 1 L of river water at a 100 ng/L spike level were in the range of 77.5-99.1%. The recoveries of organophosphorus pesticides extracted from a 5-g soil sample at the 100 microg/kg level were in the range of 79.3-93.5%. The limit of detection varied from 10 to 32 ng/L in water and from 12 to 34 microg/kg in soil samples. The molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) enabled the selective extraction of four organophosphorus pesticides successfully from water and soil samples, demonstrating the potential of molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction for rapid, selective, and cost-effective sample pretreatment.     

高效液相色谱法同时测定含脂羊毛中残留的除虫脲和杀铃脲

建立了同时测定含脂羊毛中除虫脲和杀铃脲的反相高效液相色谱方法。样品用正己烷-乙醚混合溶剂提取,经凝胶渗透色谱柱和固相萃取柱净化后,采用反相高效液相色谱-二极管阵列检测器检测,外标法定量。除虫脲和杀铃脲分别在0.41～41 mg/L和0.38～38 mg/L范围内线性关系良好,相关系数分别为0.9996和0.9999。最低检出限:除虫脲为0.22 mg/kg,杀铃脲为0.18 mg/kg;最低定量限:除虫脲为0.73 mg/kg,杀铃脲为0.60 mg/kg。在添加水平为0.76～10.25 mg/kg的除虫脲和杀铃脲时,平均加标回收率为86.3%～96.7%,相对标准偏差为4.2%～8.7%。该方法杂质干扰小、回收率高、重现性好,能够对含脂羊毛中除虫脲和杀铃脲残留量进行准确的定性定量分析。     

Dispersive solid-phase extraction cleanup combined with accelerated solvent extraction for the determination of carbamate pesticide residues in Radix Glycyrrhizae samples by UPLC-MS-MS

Dispersive solid-phase extraction (DSPE) cleanup combined with accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) is described here as a new approach for the extraction of carbamate pesticides in Radix Glycyrrhizae samples prior to UPLC-MS-MS. In the DSPE-ASE method, 15 carbamate pesticides were extracted from Radix Glycyrrhizae samples with acetonitrile by the ASE method at 60 °C with a 5 min heating time and two static cycles. Cleanup of a 1 mL aliquot of the extract by the DSPE method used 20 mg PSA (primary secondary amine), 50 mg Al(2)O(3)-N, and 20 mg GCB (graphitized carbon black) (as cleanup sorbents) under the determined optimum conditions. The linearity of the method was in the range of 10 to 200 ng/mL with correlation coefficients (r(2)) of more than 0.996. The limits of detection were approximately 0.2 to 5.0 μg/kg. The method was successfully used for the analysis of target pesticides in Radix Glycyrrhizae samples. The recoveries of the carbamate pesticides at the spiking levels of 50, 100, and 200 μg/kg ranged from 79.7% to 99.3% with relative standard deviations lower than 10%. This multi-residue analytical method allows for a rapid, efficient, sensitive and reliable determination of target pesticides in Radix Glycyrrhizae and other medicinal herbs.     

微波辅助萃取-气相色谱法测定茶叶中的有机磷农药

建立了微波辅助萃取–气相色谱法测定茶叶中甲胺磷、乐果、毒死蜱、水胺硫磷、三唑磷5种有机磷农药残留量的分析方法。样品用乙酸乙酯微波辅助提取,提取液经分散固相萃取法(DSPE)净化,用气相色谱配FPD检测器测定,外标法定量。结果表明农药混合标准溶液在0.01～0.5μg/mL范围内线性良好(r>0.999),方法的检出限为0.005～0.01 mg/L,在0.05,0.125,0.5μg/mL 3个水平添加平均回收率为63.3%～99.9%,测定结果的相对标准偏差为5.1%～8.2%(n=6)。该方法适合于茶叶中多种有机磷农药残留量的同时检测。     

微波辅助萃取-分散固相萃取-气相色谱质谱法测定茶叶中23种农药残留

建立了微波辅助萃取-分散固相萃取净化-气相色谱质谱法（GC-MS）快速测定茶叶中23种农药残留量的方法. 茶叶样品用乙腈进行微波辅助萃取（MAE）,提取液经分散固相萃取（DSPE）净化处理. 采用DB-17MS毛细管色谱柱分离后,选择离子监测模式下（SIM）质谱法进行测定. 23种农药组分在0.01~0.50 mg/mL质量浓度范围内呈线性关系,相关系数r2大于0.995,方法测定低限（10S/N）为0.005~0.01 mg/kg. 以空白绿茶为基体,在4个标准添加水平0.01、0.05、0.10、0.25 mg/kg进行加标回收试验,加标平均回收率为70%~105%,相对标准偏差为3.0%~8.2%.     

High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of benzoylurea insecticides residues in grapes and wine using liquid and solid-phase extraction

A method for the determination of the benzoylurea insecticides diflubenzuron, triflumuron, teflubenzuron, lufenuron and flufenoxuron in grapes and wine by HPLC has been developed and validated. Grape samples (50 g) were homogenized and extracted with ethyl acetate-sodium sulfate and further cleaned-up by solid-phase extraction on silica sorbent. Wine samples (10 ml) diluted with water (1:3) were solid-phase extracted on an octadecyl sorbent using methanol as the eluent. The pesticides were separated on a reversed-phase octadecyl narrow-bore column by gradient elution and the residues were determined with a UV diode array detector. The calibration plots were linear over the range 0.05-5 micrograms/ml. Recoveries of benzoylurea pesticides from spiked grapes (0.02-2.0 mg/kg) and wine (0.01-0.2 mg/l) were 85.8-101.6% and 69.1-104.8%, respectively, and the limits of quantification for these insecticides were < 0.01 mg/kg for grapes and < 0.01 mg/l for wine. The method was applied to the determination of flufenoxuron and teflubenzuron residues in grapes from treated fields and in produced wine.