Controlled growth of molecularly pure Au25(SR)18 and Au38(SR)24 nanoclusters from the same polydispersed crude product

We report the controlled growth of Au25(SR)18 and Au38 (SR)24 (where R = CH2CH2Ph) nanoclusters of molecular purity via size-focusing from the same crude product that contains a distribution of nanoclusters. In this method, gold salt was first mixed with tetraoctylammonium bromide (TOAB), and then reacted with excess thiol to form Au(I)-SR polymers in THF (as opposed to toluene in previous work), followed by NaBH 4 reduction. The resultant crude product contains polydisperse nanoclusters and was then used as the common starting material for controlled growth of Au25(SR)18 and Au38(SR)24 , respectively. In Route I, Au25(SR)18 nanoclusters of molecular purify were produced from the crude product after 6 h aging at room temperature. In Route II, the crude product was isolated and further subjected to thermal thiol etching in a toluene solution containing excess thiol, and one obtained pure Au38(SR)24 nanoclusters, instead of Au25(SR)18 . This work not only provides a robust and simple method to prepare both Au25(SR)18 and Au38(SR)24 nanoclusters, but also reveals that these two nanoclusters require different environments for the size-focusing growth process.     

Selective formation of [Au23(SPhtBu)17]0, [Au26Pd(SPhtBu)20]0 and [Au24Pt(SC2H4Ph)7(SPhtBu)11]0 by controlling ligand-exchange reaction

To use atomically precise metal nanoclusters (NCs) in various application fields, it is essential to establish size-selective synthesis methods for the metal NCs. Studies on thiolate (SR)-protected gold NCs (Au_n(SR)_m NCs) revealed that the atomically precise Au_n(SR)_m NC, which has a different chemical composition from the precursor, can be synthesized size-selectively by inducing transformation in the framework structure of the metal NCs by a ligand-exchange reaction. In this study, we selected the reaction of [Au₂₅(SC₂H₄Ph)₁₈]⁻ (SC₂H₄Ph = 2-phenylethanethiolate) with 4-tert-butylbenzenethiol (^tBuPhSH) as a model ligand-exchange reaction and attempted to obtain new metal NCs by changing the amount of thiol, the central atom of the precursor NCs, or the reaction time from previous studies. The results demonstrated that [Au₂₃(SPh^tBu)₁₇]⁰, [Au₂₆Pd(SPh^tBu)₂₀]⁰ (Pd = palladium) and [Au₂₄Pt(SC₂H₄Ph)₇(SPh^tBu)₁₁]⁰ (Pt = platinum) were successfully synthesized in a high proportion. To best of our knowledge, no report exists on the selective synthesis of these three metal NCs. The results of this study show that a larger variety of metal NCs could be synthesized size-selectively than at present if the ligand-exchange reaction is conducted while changing the reaction conditions and/or the central atoms of the precursor metal NCs from previous studies.

This study succeeded in obtaining three new thiolate protected metal nanoclusters by changing the ligand-exchange condition from previous studies.     

An Atomic‐Level Strategy for Unraveling Gold Nanocatalysis from the Perspective of Aun(SR)m Nanoclusters

An atomic‐level strategy is devised to gain insight into the origin of nanogold catalysis by using atomically monodisperse Au_n(SR)_m nanoclusters as well‐defined catalysts for styrene oxidation. The Au_n(SR)_m nanoclusters are emerging as a new class of gold nanocatalyst to overcome the polydispersity of conventional nanoparticle catalysts. The unique atom‐packing structure and electronic properties of Au_n(SR)_m nanoclusters (<2 nm) are rationalized to be responsible for their extraordinary catalytic activity observed in styrene oxidation. An interesting finding is that quantum size effects of Au_n(SR)_m nanoclusters, rather than the higher specific surface area, play a major role in gold‐catalyzed selective oxidation of styrene. For example, Au₂₅(SR)₁₈ nanoclusters (≈1 nm) are found to be particularly efficient in activating O₂, which is a key step in styrene oxidation, and hence, the ultrasmall Au₂₅ catalyst exhibits higher activity than do larger sizes. This atomic‐level strategy has allowed us to obtain an important insight into some fundamental aspects of nanogold catalysis in styrene oxidation. The ultrasmall yet robust Au_n(SR)_m nanoclusters are particularly promising for studying the mechanistic aspects of nanogold catalysis and for future design of better catalysts with high activity and selectivity for certain chemical processes.     

Unraveling the Impact of Gold(I)–Thiolate Motifs on the Aggregation-Induced Emission of Gold Nanoclusters

Aggregation-induced emission (AIE) provides an efficient strategy to synthesize highly luminescent metal nanoclusters (NCs), however, rational control of emission energy and intensity of metal NCs is still challenging. This communication reveals the impact of surface Au^I-thiolate motifs on the AIE properties of Au NCs, by employing a series of water-soluble glutathione (GSH)-coordinated Au complexes and NCs as a model ([Au₁₀SR₁₀], [Au₁₅SR₁₃], [Au₁₈SR₁₄], and [Au₂₅SR₁₈]⁻, SR=thiolate ligand). Spectroscopic investigations show that the emission wavelength of Au NCs is adjustable from visible to the near-infrared II (NIR-II) region by controlling the length of the Au^I-SR motifs on the NC surface. Decreasing the length of Au^I-SR motifs also changes the origin of cluster luminescence from AIE-type phosphorescence to Au⁰-core-dictated fluorescence. This effect becomes more prominent when the degree of aggregation of Au NCs increases in solution.     

Hard-Sphere Random Close-Packed Au47Cd2(TBBT)31 Nanoclusters with a Faradaic Efficiency of Up to 96 % for Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to CO

Metal nanoclusters have recently attracted considerable attention, not only because of their special size range but also because of their well-defined compositions and structures. However, subtly tailoring the compositions and structures of metal nanoclusters for potential applications remains challenging. Now, a two-phase anti-galvanic reduction (AGR) method is presented for precisely tailoring Au₄₄(TBBT)₂₈ to produce Au₄₇Cd₂(TBBT)₃₁ nanoclusters with a hard-sphere random close-packed structure, exhibiting Faradaic efficiencies of up to 96 % at −0.57 V for the electrocatalytic reduction of CO₂ to CO.     

Phosphine-Triggered Structural Defects in Au44 Homologues Boost Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction

The systematic induction of structural defects at the atomic level is crucial to metal nanocluster research because it endows cluster-based catalysts with highly reactive centers and allows for a comprehensive investigation of viable reaction pathways. Herein, by substituting neutral phosphine ligands for surface anionic thiolate ligands, we establish that one or two Au₃ triangular units can be successfully introduced into the double-stranded helical kernel of Au₄₄(TBBT)₂₈, where TBBT=4-tert-butylbenzenethiolate, resulting in the formation of two atomically precise defective Au₄₄ nanoclusters. Along with the regular face-centered-cubic (fcc) nanocluster, the first series of mixed-ligand cluster homologues is identified, with a unified formula of Au₄₄(PPh₃)_n(TBBT)_28−2n (n=0–2). The Au₄₄(PPh₃)(TBBT)₂₆ nanocluster having major structural defects at the bottom of the fcc lattice demonstrates superior electrocatalytic performance in the CO₂ reduction to CO. Density functional theory calculations indicate that the active site near the defects significantly lowers the free energy for the *COOH formation, the rate-determining step in the whole catalytic process.     

Isomerization-induced enhancement of luminescence in Au28(SR)20 nanoclusters

Understanding the origin and structural basis of the photoluminescence (PL) phenomenon in thiolate-protected metal nanoclusters is of paramount importance for both fundamental science and practical applications. It remains a major challenge to correlate the PL properties with the atomic-level structure due to the complex interplay of the metal core (i.e. the inner kernel) and the exterior shell (i.e. surface Au(i)-thiolate staple motifs). Decoupling these two intertwined structural factors is critical in order to understand the PL origin. Herein, we utilize two Au₂₈(SR)₂₀ nanoclusters with different –R groups, which possess the same core but different shell structures and thus provide an ideal system for the PL study. We discover that the Au₂₈(CHT)₂₀ (CHT: cyclohexanethiolate) nanocluster exhibits a more than 15-fold higher PL quantum yield than the Au₂₈(TBBT)₂₀ nanocluster (TBBT: p-tert-butylbenzenethiolate). Such an enhancement is found to originate from the different structural arrangement of the staple motifs in the shell, which modifies the electron relaxation dynamics in the inner core to different extents for the two nanoclusters. The emergence of a long PL lifetime component in the more emissive Au₂₈(CHT)₂₀ nanocluster reveals that its PL is enhanced by suppressing the nonradiative pathway. The presence of long, interlocked staple motifs is further identified as a key structural parameter that favors the luminescence. Overall, this work offers structural insights into the PL origin in Au₂₈(SR)₂₀ nanoclusters and provides some guidelines for designing luminescent metal nanoclusters for sensing and optoelectronic applications.

Two Au₂₈(SR)₂₀ nanoclusters with an identical core but different shells exhibit a ∼15-fold difference in photoluminescence.     

Unraveling the Impact of Gold(I)–Thiolate Motifs on the Aggregation‐Induced Emission of Gold Nanoclusters

Aggregation‐induced emission (AIE) provides an efficient strategy to synthesize highly luminescent metal nanoclusters (NCs), however, rational control of emission energy and intensity of metal NCs is still challenging. This communication reveals the impact of surface Au^I‐thiolate motifs on the AIE properties of Au NCs, by employing a series of water‐soluble glutathione (GSH)‐coordinated Au complexes and NCs as a model ([Au₁₀SR₁₀], [Au₁₅SR₁₃], [Au₁₈SR₁₄], and [Au₂₅SR₁₈]^?, SR=thiolate ligand). Spectroscopic investigations show that the emission wavelength of Au NCs is adjustable from visible to the near‐infrared II (NIR‐II) region by controlling the length of the Au^I‐SR motifs on the NC surface. Decreasing the length of Au^I‐SR motifs also changes the origin of cluster luminescence from AIE‐type phosphorescence to Au⁰‐core‐dictated fluorescence. This effect becomes more prominent when the degree of aggregation of Au NCs increases in solution.     

Aurophilic Interactions in the Self‐Assembly of Gold Nanoclusters into Nanoribbons with Enhanced Luminescence

Aurophilic interactions (Au^I???Au^I) are crucial in directing the supramolecular self‐assembly of many gold(I) compounds; however, this intriguing chemistry has been rarely explored for the self‐assembly of nanoscale building blocks. Herein, we report on studies on aurophilic interactions in the structure‐directed self‐assembly of ultrasmall gold nanoparticles or nanoclusters (NCs, <2 nm) using [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]^? (SR=thiolate ligand) as a model cluster. The self‐assembly of NCs is initiated by surface‐motif reconstruction of [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]^? from short SR‐[Au^I‐SR]₂ units to long SR‐[Au^I‐SR]_x (x>2) staples accompanied by structure modification of the intrinsic Au₁₃ kernel. Such motif reconstruction increases the content of Au^I species in the protecting shell of Au NCs, providing the structural basis for directed aurophilic interactions, which promote the self‐assembly of Au NCs into well‐defined nanoribbons in solution. More interestingly, the compact structure and effective aurophilic interactions in the nanoribbons significantly enhance the luminescence intensity of Au NCs with an absolute quantum yield of 6.2 % at room temperature.     

One‐Pot Synthesis of Phenylmethanethiolate‐Protected Au20(SR)16 and Au24(SR)20 Nanoclusters and Insight into the Kinetic Control

We report two synthetic routes for concurrent formation of phenylmethanethiolate (‐SCH₂Ph)‐protected Au₂₀(SR)₁₆ and Au₂₄(SR)₂₄ nanoclusters in one‐pot by kinetic control. Unlike the previously reported methods for thiolate‐protected gold nanoclusters, which typically involve rapid reduction of the gold precursor by excess NaBH₄ and subsequent size focusing into atomically monodisperse clusters of a specific size, the present work reveals some insight into the kinetic control in gold–thiolate cluster synthesis. We demonstrate that the synthesis of ‐SCH₂Ph‐protected Au₂₀ and Au₂₄ nanoclusters can be obtained through two different, kinetically controlled methods. Specifically, route 1 employs slow addition of a relatively large amount of NaBH₄ under slow stirring of the reaction mixture, while route 2 employs rapid addition of a small amount of NaBH₄ under rapid stirring of the reaction mixture. At first glance, these two methods apparently possess quite different reaction kinetics, but interestingly they give rise to exactly the same product (i.e., the coproduction of Au₂₀(SCH₂Ph)₁₆ and Au₂₄(SCH₂Ph)₂₀ clusters). Our results explicitly demonstrate the complex interplay between the kinetic factors that include the addition speed and amount of NaBH₄ solution as well as the stirring speed of the reaction mixture. Such insight is important for devising synthetic routes for different sized nanoclusters. We also compared the photoluminescence and electrochemical properties of PhCH₂S‐protected Au₂₀ and Au₂₄ nanoclusters with the PhC₂H₄S‐protected counterparts. A surprising 2.5 times photoluminescence enhancement was observed for the PhCH₂S‐capped nanoclusters when compared to the PhC₂H₄S‐capped analogues, thereby indicating a drastic effect of the ligand that is merely one carbon shorter.     

Tuning the Accessibility and Activity of Au25(SR)18 Nanocluster Catalysts through Ligand Engineering

In this work, the effects of thiolate ligands (‐SR, e.g., chain length and functional moiety) on the accessibility and catalytic activity of thiolate‐protected gold nanoclusters (e.g., Au₂₅(SR)₁₈) for 4‐nitrophenol hydrogenation is reported. The data suggest that Au₂₅(SR)₁₈ bearing a shorter alkyl chain shows a better accessibility to the substrates (shown by shorter induction time, t₀) and a higher catalytic activity (shown by higher apparent reaction rate constant, k_app). The functional moiety of the ligands is another determinant factor, which clearly suggests that ligand engineering of Au₂₅(SR)₁₈ would be an efficient platform for fine‐tuning its catalytic properties.     

Hard‐Sphere Random Close‐Packed Au47Cd2(TBBT)31 Nanoclusters with a Faradaic Efficiency of Up to 96 % for Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to CO

Metal nanoclusters have recently attracted considerable attention, not only because of their special size range but also because of their well‐defined compositions and structures. However, subtly tailoring the compositions and structures of metal nanoclusters for potential applications remains challenging. Now, a two‐phase anti‐galvanic reduction (AGR) method is presented for precisely tailoring Au₄₄(TBBT)₂₈ to produce Au₄₇Cd₂(TBBT)₃₁ nanoclusters with a hard‐sphere random close‐packed structure, exhibiting Faradaic efficiencies of up to 96 % at ?0.57 V for the electrocatalytic reduction of CO₂ to CO.     

The Structure and Optical Properties of the [Au18(SR)14] Nanocluster

Decreasing the core size is one of the best ways to study the evolution from Au^I complexes into Au nanoclusters. Toward this goal, we successfully synthesized the [Au₁₈(SC₆H₁₁)₁₄] nanocluster using the [Au₁₈(SG)₁₄] (SG=L ‐glutathione) nanocluster as the starting material to react with cyclohexylthiol, and determined the X‐ray structure of the cyclohexylthiol‐protected [Au₁₈(C₆H₁₁S)₁₄] nanocluster. The [Au₁₈(SR)₁₄] cluster has a Au₉ bi‐octahedral kernel (or inner core). This Au₉ inner core is built by two octahedral Au₆ cores sharing one triangular face. One transitional gold atom is found in the Au₉ core, which can also be considered as part of the Au₄(SR)₅ staple motif. These findings offer new insight in terms of understanding the evolution from [Au^I(SR)] complexes into Au nanoclusters.     

Fluorescent Gold Nanoclusters with Interlocked Staples and a Fully Thiolate‐Bound Kernel

The structural features that render gold nanoclusters intrinsically fluorescent are currently not well understood. To address this issue, highly fluorescent gold nanoclusters have to be synthesized, and their structures must be determined. We herein report the synthesis of three fluorescent Au₂₄(SR)₂₀ nanoclusters (R=C₂H₄Ph, CH₂Ph, or CH₂C₆H₄^tBu). According to UV/Vis/NIR, differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and X‐ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) analysis, these three nanoclusters adopt similar structures that feature a bi‐tetrahedral Au₈ kernel protected by four tetrameric Au₄(SR)₅ motifs. At least two structural features are responsible for the unusual fluorescence of the Au₂₄(SR)₂₀ nanoclusters: Two pairs of interlocked Au₄(SR)₅ staples reduce the vibration loss, and the interactions between the kernel and the thiolate motifs enhance electron transfer from the ligand to the kernel moiety through the Au?S bonds, thereby enhancing the fluorescence. This work provides some clarification of the structure–fluorescence relationship of such clusters.     

Quantum-sized gold nanoclusters: bridging the gap between organometallics and nanocrystals

This Concept article provides an elementary discussion of a special class of large‐sized gold compounds, so‐called Au nanoclusters, which lies in between traditional organogold compounds (e.g., few‐atom complexes, <1 nm) and face‐centered cubic (fcc) crystalline Au nanoparticles (typically >2 nm). The discussion is focused on the relationship between them, including the evolution from the Au???Au aurophilic interaction in Au^I complexes to the direct Au? Au bond in clusters, and the structural transformation from the fcc structure in nanocrystals to non‐fcc structures in nanoclusters. Thiolate‐protected Au_n(SR)_m nanoclusters are used as a paradigm system. Research on such nanoclusters has achieved considerable advances in recent years and is expected to flourish in the near future, which will bring about exciting progress in both fundamental scientific research and technological applications of nanoclusters of gold and other metals.     

Homoleptic Alkynyl‐Protected Gold Nanoclusters: Au44(PhC≡C)28 and Au36(PhC≡C)24

For the first time total structure determination of homoleptic alkynyl‐protected gold nanoclusters is reported. The nanoclusters are synthesized by direct reduction of PhC≡CAu, to give Au₄₄(PhC≡C)₂₈ and Au₃₆(PhC≡C)₂₄. The Au₄₄ and Au₃₆ nanoclusters have fcc‐type Au₃₆ and Au₂₈ kernels, respectively, as well as surrounding PhC≡C‐Au‐C₂(Ph)Au‐C≡CPh dimeric “staples” and simple PhC≡C bridges. The structures of Au₄₄(PhC≡C)₂₈ and Au₃₆(PhC≡C)₂₄ are similar to Au₄₄(SR)₂₈ and Au₃₆(SR)₂₄, but the UV/Vis spectra are different. The protecting ligands influence the electronic structures of nanoclusters significantly. The synthesis of these two alkynyl‐protected gold nanoclusters indicates that a series of gold nanoclusters in the general formula Au_x (RC≡C)_y as counterparts to Au_x (SR)_y can be expected.     

Bimetallic Au2Cu6 Nanoclusters: Strong Luminescence Induced by the Aggregation of Copper(I) Complexes with Gold(0) Species

The concept of aggregation‐induced emission (AIE) has been exploited to render non‐luminescent Cu^ISR complexes strongly luminescent. The Cu^ISR complexes underwent controlled aggregation with Au⁰. Unlike previous AIE methods, our strategy does not require insoluble solutions or cations. X‐ray crystallography validated the structure of this highly fluorescent nanocluster: Six thiolated Cu atoms are aggregated by two Au atoms (Au₂Cu₆ nanoclusters). The quantum yield of this nanocluster is 11.7 %. DFT calculations imply that the fluorescence originates from ligand (aryl groups on the phosphine) to metal (Cu^I) charge transfer (LMCT). Furthermore, the aggregation is affected by the restriction of intramolecular rotation (RIR), and the high rigidity of the outer ligands enhances the fluorescence of the Au₂Cu₆ nanoclusters. This study thus presents a novel strategy for enhancing the luminescence of metal nanoclusters (by the aggregation of active metal complexes with inert metal atoms), and also provides fundamental insights into the controllable synthesis of highly luminescent metal nanoclusters.     

Synthesis and structural characterization of 2-pyrazinecarboxylate zinc compound {[Zn2(Pyz)2(H2O)4] · SO4}n (Pyz = 2-pyrazinic acid)

A solvothermal reaction of 2-pyrazinic acid with Zn(SO₄)₂ · 7H₂O yielded the title complex of the formula {[Zn₂(Pyz)₂(H₂O)₄] · SO₄} _n (I). X-ray diffraction study shows that the complex I crystallizes in mono-clinic system, space group P2₁/c, with lattice parameters a = 11.2687(6), b = 7.3511(4), c = 11.8506(7) ?, β = 95.070(2)°, V = 977.83(9) ?³, Z = 4, and ρ_calcd = 2.184 mg m⁻³.     

Interconverting WW Triple Bonds and W4 Clusters: Structures of W4(OPrn)16 and [Li2W2(OPrn)8(DME)]2*

Alcoholysis of W₂(NMe₂)₆ with excess n-propanol in hexane yields the tetranuclear cluster, W₄(OPrⁿ, I. Reduction of I with two equivalents of Li₂COT in THF gives a small yield of Li₂W₂(OPrⁿ)₈. Single crystals were isolated by cooling the product mixture in DME and were shown to be [Li₂W₂(OPrⁿ)₈(DME)]₂, II, which consists of a unique “dimer of dimers” structure. In this reaction sequence, W₄¹⁶⁺ cluster formation is followed by four electron reduction to reform the (W≡W)⁶⁺ unit. Better yields of the lithium salt can be obtained by the addition of LiOPrⁿ/HOPrⁿ solutions to W₂(OBu^t)₆ in which case Li₂W₂(OPrⁿ)₈ has been obtained as a 1:1 adduct with LiOPr. This identity of this salt was confirmed by solution NMR spectroscopy. In the alternative reaction, the (W≡W)⁶⁺ center remains intact from reactant to product. No attempt has been made to separate the product from excess LiOPr. DFT (ADF 2004.01) molecular orbital calculations on the model cluster W₄(OH)₁₆ are used to help elucidate the disruption of the W₄ cluster upon four electron reduction. The molecular structures of compounds I and II are reported.*Dedicated to Professor F. A Cotton on the occasion of his 75th birthday.     

Local Geometric Effects on Stability and Energy Gap of Thiolate‐Protected Gold Nanoparticles

Thiolate‐protected gold nanoclusters, Au_m(SR)_n, have potential applications in many fields due to their high stability and remarkable electronic properties. However, the controlling factors in determining the stability and HOMO–LUMO gap of Au_m(SR)_n remain controversial, despite decades of work on the topic. Through DFT calculations, including nonlocal many‐body dispersion (MBD) interactions, the geometric and electronic properties of Au_m(SR)_n clusters are investigated. Calculations demonstrate that the MBD interactions are essential for correctly describing the geometry and energy of the clusters. Greater anisotropic polarization and more atoms distributed in the shell of the clusters lead to more pronounced MBD interactions and higher stability of the clusters. Furthermore, the HOMO–LUMO gap of the clusters strongly depends on the gold core. These results provide critical clues for understanding and designing Au_m(SR)_n clusters.