Appraisal of “classic” and “novel” extraction procedure efficiencies for the isolation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their derivatives from biotic matrices

In this study the extraction efficiency of pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), employing different extraction solvent mixtures under different extraction conditions, was compared with extraction efficiencies of commonly used procedures, Soxhlet extraction and extraction enhanced by sonication. Spruce needles and fish tissue were selected as test samples. Purification of obtained extracts was carried out by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) employing gel Bio-Beads S-X3. Identification and quantitation of target PAHs was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (HPLC–FLD).

Within optimisation of PLE conditions, temperature of extraction, type of solvent, duration and number of static cycles as well as the influence of sample pre-treatment (drying, homogenisation, etc.) were tested. Comparison of the extraction efficiency of PLE with the efficiencies of the other techniques was done under the optimised conditions, i.e. sample slurry obtained by desiccation with anhydrous sodium sulphate, extracted at 100 °C in 1 cycle lasting 5 min. Hexane:acetone (1:1, v/v) was chosen as the most suitable extraction solvent for isolation of analytes from test samples.

Comparison of mentioned isolation techniques with respect to the amount of co-extracts, procedure blank levels and time and solvent volume demands was also done.     

Application of pressurized liquid extraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to determine 4-nonylphenols in sediments

A time- and solvent-saving method, pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), to extract 4-nonylphenol (4-NP) in sediment was developed. The effects of various operational parameters (i.e., temperature, pressure, etc.) for the quantitative extraction of 4-NP by PLE were investigated. The analytes were then identified and quantitated by a large-volume injection GC-MS technique. The 4-NP can be completely extracted by methanol at 100 degrees C and 100 atm combined with 15 min static and then 10 min dynamic extraction steps (1 atm = 101,325 Pa). Recovery of 4-NP in spiked blank kaolin samples was 98% with 5% RSD. The degrees of recovery of 4-NP in the spiked sediment samples from a reservoir and a polluted river were 111% with 4% RSD and 106% with 5% RSD, respectively. The perfect applicability of PLE for 4-NP was determined after testing it with spiked and aged samples. The extraction efficiency of the PLE was compared with conventional Soxhlet and bath ultrasonication extraction methods using the spiked sediment samples.     

Determination of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers in Coastal and River Sediments by Pressurized Liquid Extraction Coupled with Gas Chromatography‐Mass Spectrometry

This study presents a time‐ and solvent‐saving method, pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), to extract polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in sediment samples. The effects of various operating parameters (i.e., extraction solution, temperature, pressure, static/dynamic extraction times) for the quantitative extraction of PBDEs by home‐made PLE were systematically investigated and optimized. The analytes were then identified and quantitated by gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) in selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode. The 16 PBDE congeners (from tri‐ to deca‐BDE) can be completely extracted by dichloromethane: n‐hexane (3/2, v/v) at 100 °C and 100 atm combined with 15 min static and then 15 min dynamic extraction steps. Recovery of PBDEs in spiked sediment samples ranged from 52 to 104% with 2‐16% RSD, except for BDE‐206. Limits of quantitation (LOQ) were established between 4 and 400 pg/g (dry weight) in 10 g of sediment sample. The extraction efficiency of the PLE was also compared with the traditional Soxhlet extraction method. The total contents of PBDEs ranged from 8.0 to 37.9 ng/g (dry weight) in various river and coastal sediment samples in Taiwan. Deca‐BDE (BDE‐209) was the major PBDE detected in these sediment samples.     

Pressurised fluid extraction of bupirimate and ethirimol from aged soils

This paper assesses the effect of pressurised fluid extraction (PFE) on the recovery of bupirimate and its degradation product, ethirimol from a range of soil types. The analytes were extracted under standard conditions (pressure, 2000 p.s.i.; temperature, 100 degrees C; and, three static flush cycles of 5 min static extraction time each) using a variety of individual and combined solvents. It was found that the recovery of bupirimate was dependent upon the organic matter content of soil.     

Clean-up techniques in the pressurized liquid extraction of abiotic environmental solid samples

Pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) uses high pressure and temperature to perform exhaustive extraction and is one of the extraction techniques widely used for determining contaminants in environmental solid samples. However, under these conditions, compounds from the matrix are also extracted. Therefore, clean-up strategies must be often applied to remove interferences and avoid matrix effect in the subsequent determination. There are different clean-up strategies that can be used in PLE, some of which are applied during the extraction procedure and some are applied to the PLE extract. The aim of this review is to critically discuss these clean-up techniques used in PLE of abiotic environmental solid samples in the last 10 years. We provide the readers with information about the weaknesses and strengths of each strategy so they can select the most suitable clean-up technique for a specific environmental analytical problem.     

Determination of multiclass pesticides in food commodities by pressurized liquid extraction using GC–MS/MS and LC–MS/MS

Pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) was applied to the simultaneous extraction of a wide range of pesticides from food commodities. Extractions were performed by mixing 4 g of sample with 4 g of Hydromatrix and (after optimization) a mixture of ethyl acetate:acetone (3:1, v/v) as extraction solvent, a temperature of 100°C, a pressure of 1000 psi and a static extraction time of 5 min. After extraction, the more polar compounds were analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC), and the apolar and semipolar pesticides by gas chromatography (GC); in both cases LC and GC were coupled with mass spectrometry in tandem (MS/MS) mode. The overall method (including the PLE step) was validated in GC and LC according to the criteria of the SANCO Document of the European Commission. The average extraction recoveries (at two concentration levels) for most of the analytes were in the range 70–80%, with precision values usually lower than 15%. Limits of quantification (LOQ) were low enough to determine the pesticide residues at concentrations below or equal to the maximum residue levels (MRL) specified by legislation. In order to assess its applicability to the analysis of real samples, aliquots of 15 vegetable samples were processed using a conventional extraction method with dichloromethane, and the results obtained were compared with the proposed PLE method; differences lower than 0.01 mg kg⁻¹ were found.     

Pressurized liquid extraction versus other extraction techniques in micropreparative isolation of pharmacologically active isoflavones from Trifolium L. species

As a new sample preparation technique, pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), in combination with reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RP-LC) and photodiode-array (PDA) detection were used for the isolation and determination of phytoestrogenic isoflavones in hydrolyzed extracts obtained from aerial parts of five Trifolium L. (clover) species. To optimize the effectiveness of PLE procedure, variable extraction parameters: methanol and acetone (or their 75% aqueous solutions), as extraction solvents, temperatures (75, 100 and 125 °C) and the changeable number of static extraction cycles were tested. Additionally, two other micropreparative techniques: ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), and conventional solvent extraction (CSE), under optimized conditions, were also used and compared. Optimum extraction efficiency, expressed in the highest yield of biochanin A, formononetin, daidzein and genistein from plant material, with PLE, using methanol-water (75:25, v/v) as an extraction solvent, an oven temperature of 125 °C and three 5-min static extraction cycles, was obtained.     

Optimisation of pressurised liquid extraction for the determination of p,p′-DDT and p,p′-DDE in aged contaminated Ethiopian soils

The effectiveness of extracting p,p′-DDT and p,p′-DDE from aged contaminated soil samples by means of pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) was evaluated. Two soil samples, which were contaminated more than 10 years ago, were used in the investigation. The static extraction time was optimised and then validated against the total sum of target analytes obtained from multiple sequential extractions. The PLE results were also compared with Soxhlet extraction (SOX). PLE for 3×10 min at 100 °C was proven to be more exhaustive than SOX in the determination of p,p′-DDE from both soil samples. In the case of p,p′-DDT, PLE was found to be equally as exhaustive as SOX. Additionally, most of the previous PLE investigations used hazardous organic solvents such as n-hexane, toluene and dichloromethane mixed with acetone, whereas in this investigation the less toxic solvent combination n-heptane/acetone has been employed.     

Extraction and determination of sulfonamides, macrolides, and trimethoprim in sewage sludge

Pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) was optimized and validated for the determination of sulfonamide and macrolide antimicrobials and trimethoprim in sewage sludge samples. A mixture of water/methanol (50:50, v/v) was found as the most efficient extraction solvent. A temperature of 100 degrees C and a pressure of 100 bar were chosen for extraction. Two cycles of 5 min each efficiently extracted at least 97% of the total extractable amount of all studied analytes from activated sludge. The limits of quantification (S/N= 10) varied between 3 and 41 microg/kg dry weight (dw) and the relative recoveries ranged between 78 and 142%. Additionally, the influence of pH and different LC/MS/MS systems on the absolute recoveries was assessed. Of the investigated antimicrobials sulfapyridin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, azithromycin, clarithromycin and roxithromycin were detected in municipal sewage sludge samples. Concentrations in activated sludge ranged up to 197 microg/kgdw. In comparison, results obtained by ultrasonic solvent extraction were significantly lower for sulfonamides and in tendency lower for macrolides.     

Comparison of the effectiveness of recent extraction procedures for antibiotic residues in bovine muscle tissues

Acetonitrile extraction followed by primary-secondary amine dispersive SPE cleanup QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe), was compared to pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) using water at 70 degrees C for 10 min at 1500 psi for the determination of 16 veterinary drugs in bovine muscle tissues by LC/MS/MS. PLE was significantly more effective for the extraction of veterinary drugs (ranging from 69 to 103% with RSD < or = 18%) than QuEChERS (ranging from 19 to 89% with RSD < or = 19%). Linearity of the calibration curves was obtained over the range considered from 10 microg/kg or LOQ to 1000, microg/kg) with r2 > or = 0.99 for all the analytes by both methods. Although an internal standard was used, matrix effects were corrected using matrix- matched standards. LODs were from 5 to 30 microg/kg for PLE and from 10 to 100 microg/kg for QuEChERS. To establish and assess the most efficient conditions for each extraction method, statistical parametric and nonparametric tests were used. PLE with water almost eliminates the use or generation of hazardous wastes. The two methods were applied successfully in a routine analysis during surveys in 2008.     

Miniaturised selective pressurised liquid extraction of polychlorinated biphenyls from foodstuffs

The feasibility of miniaturised pressurised liquid extraction (PLE) with in-cell purification and subsequent gas chromatography with micro-electron capture detection (GC-micro-ECD) for the determination of prioritary and toxic polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in a variety of foodstuffs (fat contents in the range 22-49%, w/w, on a freeze-dried basis) has been investigated. After optimisation of the several experimental parameters affecting the efficiency of the selective PLE process, the developed method provided quantitative recoveries of the endogenous PCBs studied and complete fat elimination in a single step using n-hexane as extraction solvent. A total solvent volume of 3.5 mL was used for the two consecutive 7 min static PLEs of 100-mg samples. Detection limits using GC-micro-ECD were below 0.2 ng/g freeze dried sample for all 22 PCBs investigated in real-life foodstuffs, and the repeatability of the complete PLE plus GC-micro-ECD method as calculated for the analysis of the endogenous PCBs in general was better than 14%. Comparison of the miniaturised PLE method developed with either conventional Soxhlet extraction or matrix solid phase dispersion with subsequent (off-line) clean-up for the analysis of non-spiked samples showed that the efficiency of PLE was similar to or better (recoveries in the range 83-133%, as calculated for the endogenous analytes) than for the other two extraction methods assayed.     

Pressurized liquid extraction as a sample preparation method for the analysis of isoflavones in pulses

In this work, we describe a rapid and simple analytical method that exploits pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) and liquid chromatography with diode array detection for the determination of isoflavones in samples of Spanish pulses. Confirmation of the analytes present was performed using ion-trap mass spectrometry. To optimize the PLE extraction, variables such as the dispersing agent, type of solvent and sample amount, and the experimental parameters, such as temperature and the number of extraction cycles, were studied. Separation was carried out using a reverse-phase C18 with polar endcapping as the stationary phase and acetonitrile/water with 0.2?% of formic acid, under a gradient regime, as the mobile phase. Optimal extraction of formononetin and biochanin-A from chickpeas with PLE was achieved using Hydromatrix as a dispersant agent, methanol/water (50:50), a temperature of 90?°C, and three cycles. The same optimal conditions-except methanol/water (75:25)-for solvent extraction were obtained for the extraction of daidzin, genistin, and formononetin from lentils. Recoveries ranged from 97 to 110?%, and standard deviations lower than 20?% were obtained. The contents obtained for daidzin in lentils using the proposed method were not significantly different from those obtained using another official method of analysis.     

Extraction of Astaxanthin from Shrimp Waste Using Pressurized Hot Ethanol

An efficient and environmentally sustainable extraction method is proposed for the enrichment of a high-value pigment, astaxanthin, from a low-value raw material, shrimp waste. Ethanol at elevated temperature and pressure was used as a “green” extraction solvent. An experimental design approach based on central composite design was used to investigate the dependence of pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) operating variables (pressure, temperature, extraction time) on the recovered astaxanthin concentration from shrimp waste. The results show that at a 95% confidence level, the most significant PLE operating variables were extraction temperature and time. Extraction pressure had only a minor effect on the astaxanthin recovery in the studied experimental conditions. The maximum astaxanthin recovery obtainable by PLE was calculated from the chemometrics results and then appraised by experiments. Our results show astaxanthin yields of around 24 mg kg^?1 shrimp waste. The reproducibility of the developed PLE method is good, showing a relative standard deviation of 3.5% (n = 6) for astaxanthin.     

Extraction and analysis of ochratoxin A in bread using pressurised liquid extraction and liquid chromatography

A pressurised liquid extraction (PLE) method for the analysis of ochratoxin A (OTA) in bread samples is given. Parameters such as solvent, temperature, pressure and time were investigated thoroughly. The optimized PLE conditions were: methanol as extraction solvent, 80 degrees C, 2000 psi and a 5-min cycle. OTA was determined by liquid chromatography coupled with fluorescence detection and confirmed by methyl ester derivatization. Under these conditions OTA recovery is 92.3% with a RSD of 5%. Limits of detection and quantification were 0.02 and 0.06 microg/kg, respectively. The proposed method was applied to 20 bread samples, finding two positive samples with OTA levels below the maximum permitted levels by the European Union.     

Differences in the yields of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by pressurized liquid extraction and the Japanese official method

To improve the extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from sediment samples, we optimized the conditions of pressurized liquid extraction (PLE). The yields increased as the extraction temperature increased from 100 to 190 degrees C, but the effect of increasing pressure (from 15 to 20 MPa) was small. Parameters of 190 degrees C and 20 MPa, near the maximum of the equipment, gave the highest yield. Under these conditions, the yields of 17 PAHs were 1.5 - 34 times those obtained by the Japanese official method (shaking and ultrasonic extraction with acetone at room temperature).     

Comparison of ultrasonic and pressurized liquid extraction for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic compounds in soil samples by gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

A pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) method has been optimized for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil samples and it was compared with ultrasonic extraction. The extraction step was followed by gas chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC-QqQ-MS/MS) analysis. Parameters such as type of solvent, extraction time, extraction temperature and number of extractions were optimized. There were no significant differences among the two extraction methods although better extraction efficiencies were obtained when PLE was used, minimizing extraction time and solvent consumption. PLE procedure was validated, obtaining limits of detection (LODs) ranging from 0.02 to 0.75 μg kg⁻¹ and limits of quantification (LOQs) ranging from 0.07 to 2.50 μg kg⁻¹ for the selected PAHs. Recoveries were in the range of 59-110%, except for naphthalene, which was the most volatile PAH. Finally, the method was applied to real soil samples from Southeast of Spain. PAHs concentrations were low, and phenanthrene, pyrene, fluorene, benzo[a]pyrene and chrysene were the most frequently detected analytes in the samples.     

Determination of chlormequat and mepiquat in pear,tomato, and wheat flour using on-line solid-phase extraction (Prospekt) coupled with liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry

A new methodology based on pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) followed by LC-MS is presented for the simultaneous and unequivocal determination of alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEOs) and their degradation products, alkylphenols (APs) and alkylphenoxy carboxylates (APECs), in sediment samples. The protocol, applicable to a full range of APEO oligomers and degradation products, permits the sensitive and selective determination of APEOs (nEO = 1-15), APECs (nEO = 0-1) and APs at low ppb levels (LODs = 1-5 microg/kg) in sediment samples. Optimization of the operational parameters of PLE clearly demonstrates that significant thermal losses of APs occur during extraction at elevated temperatures. The loss of octylphenol (OP) at 100 degrees C was 61.2% and of nonylphenol (NP) 40.0%, whereas other compounds were completely recovered. Thus, to avoid losses due to the volatility of alkylphenols, a low extraction temperature should be applied. The conditions that gave the best results for all target compounds were as follows: extraction solvent mixture, methanol-acetone (1:1, v/v); temperature, 50 degrees C; pressure, 1500 p.s.i.; two static cycles. Using PLE and a subsequent clean-up with solid-phase extraction (SPE), the simultaneous extraction of APEOs, APs and APECs from sediment samples was achieved yielding recoveries >70% and producing low MS background noise. The developed methodology was applied on a routine basis to the analysis of alkylphenolic compounds in sediment samples. APEOs and their persistent degradation products were detected in significant concentrations in sediments from Portuguese rivers, especially at sites situated in the proximity of industrial plants (mainly the textile industry). The total concentration of alkylphenolic compounds (APEOs+APs+APECs) ranged from 155 to 2400 microg/kg. Of all the alkylphenolic compounds, NP comprised 40 to 50% with concentrations up to 1172 microg/kg.     

Comparison of pressurized liquid extraction and microwave assisted extraction for the determination of organochlorine pesticides in vegetables

A method to determine organochlorine pesticides in horticultural samples (lettuce, tomato, spinach, potato, turnip leaf and green bean) using pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) is described and compared with microwave assisted extraction (MAE). Significant parameters affecting PLE procedure such as temperature, static extraction time and extraction solvent were optimised and discussed. Clean-up of extracts was performed by solid phase extraction (SPE) using a carbon cartridge as adsorbent. Pesticides were determined by gas chromatography and electron capture detection (GC-ECD). Analytical recoveries obtained were ca. 100% and the relative standard deviations were lower than 15% for most of the studied pesticides with the proposed methods in each analysed matrix.     

Pressurized Liquid Extraction Combined with Dispersive Liquid‐liquid Micro‐extraction as an Efficient Sample Preparation Method for Determination of Volatile Components in Tobacco

The pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) followed by dispersive liquid–liquid micro‐extraction (DLLME) has been developed for extraction of volatile components in tobacco. 35 volatile components were detected by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC‐MS). Methanol–methyl tert‐butyl ether (MTBE) (8:2, v/v) was selected as PLE extraction solvent. The optimized DLLME procedure, 3 mL of pure water and 1.0 mL tobacco extract solution, 40 μL of chloroform as extraction solvent, 0.5 mL of acetonitrile as disperser solvent, was validated. Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factors were in the range of 96‐159. The limits of detection were between 0.14 and 0.33 μg/kg. The repeatability of the proposed method, expressed as relative standard deviation, varied between 4.3 and 7.5% (n = 6). The recoveries of the analytes evaluated by fortification of tobacco samples were in the range of 84.7‐96.4%. Compared with the conventional sample preparation method for determination of volatile components in tobacco, the proposed method was quick and easy to operate, and had high‐enrichment factors and low consumption of organic solvent.     

Application of static liquid-phase microextraction to the analysis of organochlorine pesticides in water.

Static liquid-phase microextraction, with subsequent analysis by gas chromatography-electron-capture detection, has been applied to extract eight organochlorine pesticides from water. A conventional microsyringe was used to extract analytes from water samples over a concentration range of 0.05-100 microg/l. Factors relevant to the extraction process were investigated. The sensitivity of the method was enhanced with agitation, and increasing the extraction temperature, of the sample solution. Concentration factors of >50-fold were easily achieved within 25 min of extraction. The analytical data exhibited a relative standard deviation (RSD) range of 3.2% (lindane) to 10.7% (methoxychlor) for the eight pesticides; most RSD values were under 7%. Water samples collected from a reservoir, and from tap water in a chemical laboratory were analyzed using the procedure.