Oxidative Fragmentations of the 5α‐ and 5β‐Hydroxy‐B‐norcholestan‐ 3β‐yl Acetates

Oxidations of 5α‐hydroxy‐B‐norcholestan‐3β‐yl acetate ( 8 ) with Pb(OAc)₄ under thermal or photolytic conditions or in the presence of iodine afforded only complex mixtures of compounds. However, the HgO/I₂ version of the hypoiodite reaction gave as the primary products the stereoisomeric (Z)‐ and (E)‐1(10)‐unsaturated 5,10‐seco B‐nor‐derivatives 10 and 11 , and the stereoisomeric (5R,10R)‐ and (5S,10S)‐acetals 14 and 15 (Scheme 4). Further reaction of these compounds under conditions of their formation afforded, in addition, the A‐nor 1,5‐cyclization products 13 and 16 (from 10 ) and 12 (from 11 ) (see also Scheme 6) and the 6‐iodo‐5,6‐secolactones 17 and 19 (from 14 and 15 , resp.) and 4‐iodo‐4,5‐secolactone 18 (from 15 ) (see also Scheme 7). Oxidations of 5β‐hydroxy‐B‐norcholestan‐3β‐yl acetate ( 9 ) with both hypoiodite‐forming reagents (Pb(OAc)₄/I₂ and HgO/I₂) proceeded similarly to the HgO/I₂ reaction of the corresponding 5α‐hydroxy analogue 8 . Photolytic Pb(OAc)₄ oxidation of 9 afforded, in addition to the (Z)‐ and (E)‐5,10‐seco 1(10)‐unsaturated ketones 10 and 11 , their isomeric 5,10‐seco 10(19)‐unsaturated ketone 22 , the acetal 5‐acetate 21 , and 5β,19‐epoxy derivative 23 (Scheme 9). Exceptionally, in the thermal Pb(OAc)₄ oxidation of 9 , the 5,10‐seco ketones 10, 11 , and 22 were not formed, the only reaction being the stereoselective formation of the 5,10‐ethers with the β‐oriented epoxy bridge, i.e. the (10R)‐enol ether 20 and (5S,10R)‐acetal 5‐acetate 21 (Scheme 8). Possible mechanistic interpretations of the above transformations are discussed.     

Poly[bis(μ2‐2‐aminopyrazine‐κ2N1:N4)(μ2‐nitrato‐κ2O:O)(nitrato‐κ2O,O′)disilver(I)]: an achiral two‐dimensional coordination polymer forming chiral crystals

The solution reaction of AgNO₃ and 2‐aminopyrazine (apyz) in a 1:1 ratio gives rise to the title compound, [Ag₂(NO₃)₂(C₄H₅N₃)₂]_n, (I), which possesses a chiral crystal structure. In (I), both of the crystallographically independent Ag^I cations are coordinated in tetrahedral geometries by two N atoms from two apyz ligands and two O atoms from nitrate anions; however, the Ag^I centers show two different coordination environments in which one is coordinated by two O atoms from two different symmetry‐related nitrate anions and the second is coordinated by two O atoms from a single nitrate anion. The crystal structure consists of one‐dimensional Ag^I–apyz chains, which are further extended by μ₂‐κ²O:O nitrate anions into a two‐dimensional (4,4) sheet. N—H...O and C_apyz—H...O hydrogen bonds connect neighboring sheets to form a three‐dimensional supramolecular framework.     

catena‐Poly[[silver(I)‐μ‐[9,10‐bis(1H‐benzimidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)anthracene]‐κ2N3:N3′] bis(nitrato‐κO)silver(I)]

Yellow needle‐shaped crystals of the title compound, {[Ag(C₃₀H₂₂N₄)][Ag(NO₃)₂]}_n, were obtained by the reaction of AgNO₃ and 9,10‐bis(benzimidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)anthracene (L) in a 2:1 ratio. The asymmetric unit consists of two Ag^I cations, one half L ligand and one nitrate anion. One Ag^I cation occupies a crystallographic inversion centre and links two N‐atom donors of two distinct L ligands to form an infinite one‐dimensional coordination polymer. The second Ag^I cation lies on a crystallographic twofold axis and is coordinated by two O‐atom donors of two nitrate anions to form an [Ag(NO₃)₂]⁻ counter‐ion. The polymeric chains are linked into a supramolecular framework via weak Ag...O [3.124 (5) Å] and Ag...π (2.982 Å) interactions (π is the centroid of an outer anthracene benzene ring). The π interactions contain two short Ag...C contacts [2.727 (6) and 2.765 (6) Å], which can be considered to define Ag–η²‐anthracene bonding interactions. In comparison with a previously reported binuclear Ag^I complex [Du, Hu, Zhang, Zeng & Bu (2008). CrystEngComm, 10 , 1866–1874], this new one‐dimensional coordination polymer was obtained by changing the metal–ligand ratio during the synthesis.     

Methyl 2‐acetamido‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d‐glucopyranoside dihydrate and methyl 2‐formamido‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d‐glucopyranoside

Methyl 2‐acetamido‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐glucopyranoside (β‐GlcNAcOCH₃), (I), crystallizes from water as a dihydrate, C₉H₁₇NO₆·H₂O, containing two independent molecules [denoted (IA) and (IB)] in the asymmetric unit, whereas the crystal structure of methyl 2‐formamido‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐glucopyranoside (β‐GlcNFmOCH₃), (II), C₈H₁₅NO₆, also obtained from water, is devoid of solvent water molecules. The two molecules of (I) assume distorted ⁴C₁ chair conformations. Values of ϕ for (IA) and (IB) indicate ring distortions towards B_C2,C5 and ^C3,O5B, respectively. By comparison, (II) shows considerably more ring distortion than molecules (IA) and (IB), despite the less bulky N‐acyl side chain. Distortion towards B_C2,C5 was observed for (II), similar to the findings for (IA). The amide bond conformation in each of (IA), (IB) and (II) is trans, and the conformation about the C—N bond is anti (C—H is approximately anti to N—H), although the conformation about the latter bond within this group varies by ∼16°. The conformation of the exocyclic hydroxymethyl group was found to be gt in each of (IA), (IB) and (II). Comparison of the X‐ray structures of (I) and (II) with those of other GlcNAc mono‐ and disaccharides shows that GlcNAc aldohexopyranosyl rings can be distorted over a wide range of geometries in the solid state.     

A copper(I) coordination polymer incorporation the corrosion inhibitor 1H‐benzotriazole: poly[μ3‐benzotriazolato‐κ3N1:N2:N3‐copper(I)]

The title complex, [Cu(C₆H₄N₃)]_n, was synthesized by the reaction of cupric nitrate, 1H‐benzotriazole (BTAH) and aqueous ammonia under hydrothermal conditions. The asymmetric unit contains three crystallographically independent Cu^I cations and two 1H‐benzotriazolate ligands. Two of the Cu^I cations, one with a linear two‐coordinated geometry and one with a four‐coordinated tetrahedral geometry, are located on sites with crystallographically imposed twofold symmetry. The third Cu^I cation, with a planar three‐coordinated geometry, is on a general position. Two Cu^I cations are doubly bridged by two BTA⁻ ligands to afford a noncentrosymmetric planar [Cu₂(BTA)₂] subunit, and two [Cu₂(BTA)₂] subunits are arranged in an antiparallel manner to form a centrosymmetric [Cu₂(BTA)₂]₂ secondary building unit (SBU). The SBUs are connected in a crosswise manner via the sharing of four‐coordinated Cu^I cations, Cu—N bonding and bridging by two‐coordinate Cu^I cations, resulting in a one‐dimensional chain along the c axis. These one‐dimensional chains are further linked by C—H...π and weak van der Waals interactions to form a three‐dimensional supramolecular architecture.     

The coordination polymer poly[(μ3‐3‐aminocarbonylpyrazine‐2‐carboxylato‐κ3N1:O2:O2′)silver(I)]

The title compound, [Ag(C₆H₄N₃O₃)]_n or [Ag(pyzca)]_n (where pyzca is 3‐aminocarbonylpyrazine‐2‐carboxylate), (I), was obtained by silver‐catalysed partial hydrolysis of pyrazine‐2,3‐dicarbonitrile in aqueous solution. The compound has a distorted trigonal–planar coordination geometry around the Ag^I ion, with each ligand bridging three Ag^I ions to form a one‐dimensional strand of molecules parallel to the b axis. An extensive hydrogen‐bond pattern connects these strands to form a three‐dimensional network of mog topology.     

Two novel silver(I) coordination polymers: poly[(μ2‐2‐aminopyrimidine‐κ2N1:N3)bis(μ3‐thiocyanato‐κ3S:S:S)disilver(I)] and poly[(2‐amino‐4,6‐dimethylpyrimidine‐κN)(μ3‐thiocyanato‐κ3N:S:S)silver(I)]

2‐Aminopyrimidine (L1) and 2‐amino‐4,6‐dimethylpyrimidine (L2) have been used to create the two novel title complexes, [Ag₂(NCS)₂(C₄H₅N₃)]_n, (I), and [Ag(NCS)(C₆H₉N₃)]_n, (II). The structures of complexes (I) and (II) are mainly directed by the steric properties of the ligands. In (I), the L1 ligand is bisected by a twofold rotation axis running through the amine N atom and opposite C atoms of the pyrimidine ring. The thiocyanate anion adopts the rare μ₃‐κ³S coordination mode to link three tetrahedrally coordinated Ag^I ions into a two‐dimensional honeycomb‐like 6³ net. The L1 ligands further extend the two‐dimensional sheet to form a three‐dimensional framework by bridging Ag^I ions in adjacent layers. In (II), with three formula units in the asymmetric unit, the L2 ligand bonds to a single Ag^I ion in a monodentate fashion, while the thiocyanate anions adopt a μ₃‐κ¹N,κ²S coordination mode to link the AgL2 subunits to form two‐dimensional sheets. These layers are linked by N—H...N hydrogen bonds between the noncoordinated amino H atoms and both thiocyanate and pyrimidine N atoms.     

Cationic Platinum(II) σ‐SiH Complexes in Carbon Dioxide Hydrosilation

The low‐electron‐count cationic platinum complex [Pt(ItBu’)(ItBu)][BAr^F], 1 , interacts with primary and secondary silanes to form the corresponding σ‐SiH complexes. According to DFT calculations, the most stable coordination mode is the uncommon η¹‐SiH. The reaction of 1 with Et₂SiH₂ leads to the X‐ray structurally characterized 14‐electron Pt^II species [Pt(SiEt₂H)(ItBu)₂][BAr^F], 2 , which is stabilized by an agostic interaction. Complexes 1 , 2 , and the hydride [Pt(H)(ItBu)₂][BAr^F], 3 , catalyze the hydrosilation of CO₂, leading to the exclusive formation of the corresponding silyl formates at room temperature.     

trans‐[Re(NH3)I2(Me2PhP)3]I3 – Bildung eines Amminaus einem Nitridoliganden

trans ‐[Re(NH₃)I₂(Me₂PhP)₃]I₃ – Formation of an Ammine Ligand from a Nitrido Ligand The reaction of [ReNCl₂(Me₂PhP)₃] (Me₂PhP = dimethylphenylphosphine) with Me₃SiI in dichloromethane results in the formation of trans‐[Re(NH₃)I₂(Me₂PhP)₃]I₃. The unusual protonation of a nitrido ligand is due to the partial decomposition of the solvent.     

Kristallstruktur,Schwingungsspektren und Normalkoordinatenanalyse von (n‐Bu4N)2[{Ru(NO)ClI2}2(μ‐I2)] · 2 I2

Crystal Structure, Vibrational Spectra, and Normal Coordinate Analysis of ( n ‐Bu₄N)₂[{Ru(NO)ClI₂}₂(μ‐I₂)] · 2 I₂ By treatment of (n‐Bu₄N)₂[Ru(NO)I₅] with (n‐Bu₄N)Cl in dichloromethane (n‐Bu₄N)₂[{Ru(NO)ClI₂}₂(μ‐I₂)] is formed. The X‐Ray structure determination on a single crystal of (n‐Bu₄N)₂[{Ru(NO)ClI₂}₂(μ‐I₂)] · 2 I₂ (monoclinic, space group I 2/a, a = 20.446(6), b = 11.482(8), c = 27.225(3) Å, β = 107.51(4)°, Z = 4) reveals a dinuclear iodine bridged structure, in which the chlorine atoms are trans positioned to the nitrosyl groups. The low temperature IR and Raman spectra have been recorded of (n‐Bu₄N)₂[{Ru(NO)ClI₂}₂(μ‐I₂)] · 2 I₂ and are assigned by normal coordinate analysis. A good agreement between observed and calculated frequencies is achieved. The valence force constants are f_d(NO) = 14.08, f_d(RuN) = 5.58, f_d(RuCl) = 1.52, f_d(RuI_t) = 0.90 and f_d(RuI_b) = 0.76 mdyn/Å.     

catena‐Poly[[[(iminodiacetato‐κO)silver(I)]‐μ3‐2‐aminopyrimidine‐κ3N1:N2:N3] monohydrate]: a one‐dimensional silver(I) coordination polymer with mixed ligands

The title compound, {[Ag(C₄H₆NO₄)(C₄H₅N₃)]·H₂O}_n, was synthesized by the reaction of silver(I) nitrate with 2‐aminopyrimidine and iminodiacetic acid. X‐ray analysis reveals that the crystal structure contains a one‐dimensional ladder‐like Ag^I coordination polymer and that N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonding results in a three‐dimensional network. The Ag^I centre is four‐coordinated by three N atoms from three different 2‐aminopyrimidine ligands and one O atom from one iminodiacetate ligand. Comparison of the structural features with previous findings suggests that the existence of a second ligand plays an important role in the construction of such polymer frameworks.     

Synthesis and Characterization of β‐Diketiminate Zinc Complexes

The monomeric β‐diketiminate zinc complex (Mes)NacNacZnMe 1 (MesNacNac = {[2,6‐(2,4,6‐Me₃‐C₆H₂)N(Me)C)]₂CH}) was obtained in almost quantitative yield from the reaction of ZnMe₂ with (Mes)NacNacH. Reaction of 1 with either Me₃NHCl or a solution of HCl in Et₂O yielded (Mes)NacNacZnCl 2 , whereas (Mes)NacNacZnI 3 was obtained from the reaction of 1 with I₂. 1 – 3 were characterized by elemental analyses, mass and multinuclear (¹H, ¹³C{¹H}) NMR spectroscopy, 3·THF also by single crystal X‐ray analysis.     

First heterobimetallic AgI–CoIII coordination compound with both bridging and terminal –NO2 coordination modes: synthesis,characterization, structural and computational studies of (PPh3)2AgI–(μ‐κ2O,O′:κN‐NO2)–CoIII(DMGH)2(κN‐NO2)

An unusual heterobimetallic bis(triphenylphosphane)(NO₂)Ag^I–Co^III(dimethylglyoximate)(NO₂) coordination compound with both bridging and terminal –NO₂ (nitro) coordination modes has been isolated and characterized from the reaction of [CoCl(DMGH)₂(PPh₃)] (DMGH₂ is dimethylglyoxime or N,N′‐dihydroxybutane‐2,3‐diimine) with excess AgNO₂. In the title compound, namely bis(dimethylglyoximato‐1κ²O,O′)(μ‐nitro‐1κN:2κ²O,O′)(nitro‐1κN)bis(triphenylphosphane‐2κP)cobalt(III)silver(I), [AgCo(C₄H₇N₂O₂)₂(NO₂)₂(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂], one of the ambidentate –NO₂ ligands, in a bridging mode, chelates the Ag^I atom in an isobidentate κ²O,O′‐manner and its N atom is coordinated to the Co^III atom. The other –NO₂ ligand is terminally κN‐coordinated to the Co^III atom. The structure has been fully characterized by X‐ray crystallography and spectroscopic methods. Density functional theory (DFT) and time‐dependent density functional theory (TD‐DFT) have been used to study the ground‐state electronic structure and elucidate the origin of the electronic transitions, respectively.     

Ein neues cis‐[Bi3I12]3−‐Anion in Tri(n‐butyl)methylammonium Dodecaiodotribismutat

The Novel cis‐[Bi₃I₁₂]^3?‐Anion in Tri(n‐butyl)methylammoniumdodecaiodo‐tribismutate By reaction of equivalent amounts of BiI₃, KI and I₂ in [N(CH₃) (n‐C₄H₉)₃][N(SO₂CF₃)₂] as Ionic Liquid, transparent reddish crystals with the composition [N(CH₃)(n‐C₄H₉)₃]₃[Bi₃I₁₂] are formed. Concerning to X‐ray diffraction investigations based on single crystals as well as powders, [N(CH₃)(n‐C₄H₉)₃]₃[Bi₃I₁₂] crystallizes monoclinic (P2₁/c; a = 2383.0(5); b = 1241.0(3); c = 2493.0(5) pm; β = 97.50(3)°; Z = 4). The anion consists of distorted (BiI₆)‐octahedra, which are face‐shared via cis‐oriented octahedral faces. With the cis‐[Bi₃I₁₂]^3?‐anion such a connectivity is firstly described.     

Bis{μ‐3‐[3‐(2‐pyridyl)pyrazol‐1‐ylmethyl]pyridine}disilver(I) bis(trifluoromethanesulfonate): effect of counter‐anions on the self‐assembly of coordination complexes

As part of a study on the effect of different counter‐anions on the self‐assembly of coordination complexes, a new dinuclear Ag^I complex, [Ag₂(C₁₄H₁₂N₄)₂](CF₃SO₃)₂, with the 3‐[3‐(2‐pyridyl)pyrazol‐1‐ylmethyl]pyridine (L) ligand was obtained through the reaction of L with AgCF₃SO₃. In this complex, each Ag^I center in the centrosymmetric dinuclear complex cation is coordinated by two pyridine and one pyrazole N‐atom donor of two inversion‐related L ligands in a trigonal planar geometry. This forms a unique box‐like cyclic dimer with an intramolecular nonbonding Ag...Ag separation of 6.379 (7) Å. Weak Ag...CF₃SO₃ and C—H...X (X = O and F) hydrogen‐bonding interactions, together with π–π stacking interactions, link the complex cations along the [001] and [10] directions, respectively, generating two different one‐dimensional chains and then an overall two‐dimensional network of the complex running parallel to the (110) plane. Comparison of the structural differences with previous findings suggests that the presence of different counter‐anions plays an important role in the construction of such supramolecular frameworks.     

Powder study of poly[(μ2‐2,2‐dimethylpropane‐1,3‐diyl diisocyanide)‐μ2‐iodido‐silver(I)]

In order to explore the chemistry of the bidentate ligand 2,2‐dimethylpropane‐1,3‐diyl diisocyanide and to investigate the effect of counter‐ions on the polymeric structure of (2,2‐dimethylpropane‐1,3‐diyl diisocyanide)silver(I) complexes, the title polymeric compound, [AgI(C₇H₁₀N₂)]_n, was synthesized by treatment of 2,2‐dimethylpropane‐1,3‐diyl diisocyanide with AgI. X‐ray powder diffraction studies show, as expected, a polymeric structure, similar to the very recently reported Cl⁻ and NO₃⁻ analogues [AgX(C₇H₁₀N₂)]_n (X = Cl⁻ or NO₃⁻). In the title structure, the Ag^I centre is bridged to two adjacent Ag^I neighbours by bidentate 2,2‐dimethylpropane‐1,3‐diyl diisocyanide ligands via the NC groups to form [Ag{CNCH₂C(CH₃)₂CH₂NC}]_n chains. The iodide counter‐ions crosslink the Ag^I centres of the chains to form a two‐dimensional polymeric {[Ag{CNCH₂C(CH₃)₂CH₂NC}]I}_n network. This study also shows that this bidentate ligand forms similar polymeric structures on treatment with AgX, regardless of the nature of the counter‐ion X⁻, and also has a strong tendency to form polymeric complexes rather than dimeric or trimeric ones.     

1, 3, 4, 4'‐Tetra(triphenylphosphanimin)‐2‐iodo‐2‐butenal‐4‐carboniumiodid, [O=C(NPPh3)C(I)=C(NPPh3)‐C(NPPh3)2]+I‐

Pale yellow single crystals of [O=C(NPPh₃)C(I)=C(NPPh₃)‐C(NPPh₃)₂]⁺I^‐·1.5 thf ( 1 ·1.5 thf) have been obtained by the reaction of INPPh₃ with thallium in thf suspension. They are characterized by IR spectroscopy and by a crystal structure determination. 1 ·1.5 thf crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n, Z = 4, lattice dimensions at ‐83?C: a = 1101.7(1), b = 3449.0(2), c = 2000.4(1) pm, β = 104.88(1)?, R₁ = 0.0382. 1 can be understood as a cationic variation of (Z)‐2‐butenale in which all H atoms are substituted by triphenylphosphoraneimine residues and by a iodine atom, respectively.     

Preparation of poly(alkylenebenzimidazole) by ruthenium complex catalyzed polycondensation of 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine with α,ω‐diols

The reactions of 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine with 1,12‐dodecanediol in 1 : 1–1:3 molar ratios in the presence of RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃ catalyst give poly(alkylenebenzimidazole), [ (CH₂)₁₁ O (CH₂)₁₁ Im / (CH₂)₁₀ Im ]_n (Im: 5,5′‐dibenzimidazole‐2,2′‐diyl) (I_a‐I_d) in 71–92% yields. The relative ratio between the [(CH₂)₁₁ O (CH₂)₁₁ Im ] unit (A) and the [‐ (CH₂)₁₀ Im ] unit (B) in the polymer chain varies depending on the ratio of the substrates used. The polymer I_a obtained from the 1 : 3 reaction contains these structural units in a 98 : 2 ratio. The polymers are soluble in polar solvents such as DMF (N,N‐dimethylformamide), DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide), and NMP (N‐methyl‐2‐pyrrolidone) and have molecular weights M_n (M_w) of 4,200–4,800 (4,800–6,500) by GPC (polystyrene standard). The polymerization of the diol and 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine in higher molar ratios leads to partial cross‐linking of the resulting polymers I_e and I_f via condensation of imidazole NH group with CH₂OH group. Similar reactions of 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine with α,ω‐diols, HO(CH₂)_mOH (m = 4–10), in a 1 : 3 molar ratio give the polymers containing [ (CH₂)_m−1 O (CH₂) _m−1 Im ] and [ (CH₂) _m−2 Im ] units with partial cross‐linked structures. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 37: 1383–1392, 1999     

Two [Cu2I2]‐based coordination polymers of 1,3‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)propane

Solvothermal reactions of Cu₂(OH)₂CO₃ with 1,3‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)propane (bpp) in the presence of aqueous ammonia in 4‐iodotoluene/CH₃CN or 1,4‐diiodobenzene/CH₃CN afforded two [Cu₂I₂]‐based coordination polymers, namely catena‐poly[[[di‐μ‐iodido‐dicopper(I)]‐bis[μ‐1,3‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)propane‐κ²N:N′]] p‐toluidine tetrasolvate], {[Cu₂I₂(C₁₃H₁₄N₂)₂]·4C₇H₉N}_n, (I), and the analogous 1,4‐diiodobenzene monosolvate, {[Cu₂I₂(C₁₃H₁₄N₂)₂]·C₆H₄I₂}_n, (II). The [Cu₂I₂] unit of (I) lies on a centre of symmetry at the mid‐point of the two I atoms, while that of (II) has a twofold axis running through the I...I line. In (I) and (II), each Cu centre is tetrahedrally coordinated by two μ‐I and two N atoms from two different bpp ligands. Each rhomboid [Cu₂I₂] unit can be considered as a four‐connecting node linked to the symmetry‐related [Cu₂I₂] units via two pairs of bpp ligands to form a one‐dimensional double chain along the c axis. The dimensions of the [Cu₂I₂(bpp)₂]₂ rings in (I) and (II) are different, which may be due to the presence of different guest solvent molecules in the structures. In (I), one p‐toluidine molecule, derived from an Ullmann coupling reaction of 4‐iodotoluene with ammonia, interacts with the [Cu₂I₂] cluster fragment through N—H...I hydrogen bonds, while the two p‐toluidine molecules interact via N—H...N hydrogen bonds. In (II), two I atoms of each 1,4‐diiodobenzene molecule are linked to the I atoms of the [Cu₂I₂] fragments from a neighbouring chain via I...I secondary interactions.     

Methyl 4‐O‐β‐D‐mannopyranosyl β‐D‐xylopyranoside

Methyl β‐D‐mannopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐D‐xylopyranoside, C₁₂H₂₂O₁₀, (I), crystallizes as colorless needles from water, with two crystallographically independent molecules, (IA) and (IB), comprising the asymmetric unit. The internal glycosidic linkage conformation in molecule (IA) is characterized by a ϕ′ torsion angle (O5′_Man—C1′_Man—O1′_Man—C4_Xyl; Man is mannose and Xyl is xylose) of −88.38 (17)° and a ψ′ torsion angle (C1′_Man—O1′_Man—C4_Xyl—C5_Xyl) of −149.22 (15)°, whereas the corresponding torsion angles in molecule (IB) are −89.82 (17) and −159.98 (14)°, respectively. Ring atom numbering conforms to the convention in which C1 denotes the anomeric C atom, and C5 and C6 denote the hydroxymethyl (–CH₂OH) C atom in the β‐Xylp and β‐Manp residues, respectively. By comparison, the internal glycosidic linkage in the major disorder component of the structurally related disaccharide, methyl β‐D‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐D‐xylopyranoside), (II) [Zhang, Oliver & Serriani (2012). Acta Cryst. C 68 , o7–o11], is characterized by ϕ′ = −85.7 (6)° and ψ′ = −141.6 (8)°. Inter‐residue hydrogen bonding is observed between atoms O3_Xyl and O5′_Man in both (IA) and (IB) [O3_Xyl...O5′_Man internuclear distances = 2.7268 (16) and 2.6920 (17) Å, respectively], analogous to the inter‐residue hydrogen bond detected between atoms O3_Xyl and O5′_Gal in (II). Exocyclic hydroxymethyl group conformation in the β‐Manp residue of (IA) is gauche–gauche, whereas that in the β‐Manp residue of (IB) is gauche–trans.