Labeling planar graphs with a condition at distance two

An L(2,1)-labeling of a graph is a mapping c:V(G)→{0,…,K} such that the labels assigned to neighboring vertices differ by at least 2 and the labels of vertices at distance two are different. The smallest K for which an L(2,1)-labeling of a graph G exists is denoted by λ_2,1(G). Griggs and Yeh [J.R. Griggs, R.K. Yeh, Labeling graphs with a condition at distance 2, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 5 (1992) 586–595] conjectured that λ_2,1(G)≤Δ² for every graph G with maximum degree Δ≥2. We prove the conjecture for planar graphs with maximum degree Δ≠3. All our results also generalize to the list-coloring setting.     

Geodetic and Steiner geodetic sets in 3-Steiner distance hereditary graphs

Let G be a connected graph and S⊆V(G). Then the Steiner distance of S, denoted by d_G(S), is the smallest number of edges in a connected subgraph of G containing S. Such a subgraph is necessarily a tree called a Steiner tree for S. The Steiner interval for a set S of vertices in a graph, denoted by I(S) is the union of all vertices that belong to some Steiner tree for S. If S={u,v}, then I(S) is the interval I[u,v] between u and v. A connected graph G is 3-Steiner distance hereditary (3-SDH) if, for every connected induced subgraph H of order at least 3 and every set S of three vertices of H, d_H(S)=d_G(S). The eccentricity of a vertex v in a connected graph G is defined as e(v)=max{d(v,x)|x∈V(G)}. A vertex v in a graph G is a contour vertex if for every vertex u adjacent with v, e(u)?e(v). The closure of a set S of vertices, denoted by I[S], is defined to be the union of intervals between pairs of vertices of S taken over all pairs of vertices in S. A set of vertices of a graph G is a geodetic set if its closure is the vertex set of G. The smallest cardinality of a geodetic set of G is called the geodetic number of G and is denoted by g(G). A set S of vertices of a connected graph G is a Steiner geodetic set for G if I(S)=V(G). The smallest cardinality of a Steiner geodetic set of G is called the Steiner geodetic number of G and is denoted by sg(G). We show that the contour vertices of 3-SDH and HHD-free graphs are geodetic sets. For 3-SDH graphs we also show that g(G)?sg(G). An efficient algorithm for finding Steiner intervals in 3-SDH graphs is developed.     

Well-covered graphs and factors

A maximum independent set of vertices in a graph is a set of pairwise nonadjacent vertices of largest cardinality α. Plummer [Some covering concepts in graphs, J. Combin. Theory 8 (1970) 91-98] defined a graph to be well-covered, if every independent set is contained in a maximum independent set of G. Every well-covered graph G without isolated vertices has a perfect [1,2]-factor F_G, i.e. a spanning subgraph such that each component is 1-regular or 2-regular. Here, we characterize all well-covered graphs G satisfying α(G)=α(F_G) for some perfect [1,2]-factor F_G. This class contains all well-covered graphs G without isolated vertices of order n with α?(n-1)/2, and in particular all very well-covered graphs.     

Induced Decompositions of Graphs

We consider those graphs G that admit decompositions into copies of a fixed graph F, each copy being an induced subgraph of G. We are interested in finding the extremal graphs with this property, that is, those graphs G on n vertices with the maximum possible number of edges. We discuss the cases where F is a complete equipartite graph, a cycle, a star, or a graph on at most four vertices.     

Rooted induced trees in triangle‐free graphs

For a graph G, let t(G) denote the maximum number of vertices in an induced subgraph of Gthat is a tree. Further, for a vertex v∈V(G), let t(G, v) denote the maximum number of vertices in an induced subgraph of Gthat is a tree, with the extra condition that the tree must contain v. The minimum of t(G) (t(G, v), respectively) over all connected triangle‐free graphs G(and vertices v∈V(G)) on nvertices is denoted by t₃(n) (t(n)). Clearly, t(G, v)?t(G) for all v∈V(G). In this note, we solve the extremal problem of maximizing |G| for given t(G, v), given that Gis connected and triangle‐free. We show that and determine the unique extremal graphs. Thus, we get as corollary that $t_3(n)\ge t_3^{\ast}(n) = \lceil {\frac{1}{2}}(1+{\sqrt{8n-7}})\rceilFor a graph G, let t(G) denote the maximum number of vertices in an induced subgraph of Gthat is a tree. Further, for a vertex v∈V(G), let t(G, v) denote the maximum number of vertices in an induced subgraph of Gthat is a tree, with the extra condition that the tree must contain v. The minimum of t(G) (t(G, v), respectively) over all connected triangle‐free graphs G(and vertices v∈V(G)) on nvertices is denoted by t₃(n) (t(n)). Clearly, t(G, v)?t(G) for all v∈V(G). In this note, we solve the extremal problem of maximizing |G| for given t(G, v), given that Gis connected and triangle‐free. We show that and determine the unique extremal graphs. Thus, we get as corollary that $t_3(n)\ge t_3^{\ast}(n) = \lceil {\frac{1}{2}}(1+{\sqrt{8n-7}})\rceil$, improving a recent result by Fox, Loh and Sudakov. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 64: 206–209, 2010     

Strong chromatic index of subset graphs

The strong chromatic index of a graph G, denoted sq(G), is the minimum number of parts needed to partition the edges of G into induced matchings. For 0 ≤ k ≤ l ≤ m, the subset graph S_m(k, l) is a bipartite graph whose vertices are the k- and l-subsets of an m element ground set where two vertices are adjacent if and only if one subset is contained in the other. We show that and that this number satisfies the strong chromatic index conjecture by Brualdi and Quinn for bipartite graphs. Further, we demonstrate that the conjecture is also valid for a more general family of bipartite graphs. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Matching graphs

The matching graph M(G) of a graph G is that graph whose vertices are the maximum matchings in G and where two vertices M₁ and M₂ of M(G) are adjacent if and only if |M₁ − M₂| = 1. When M(G) is connected, this graph models a metric space whose metric is defined on the set of maximum matchings in G. Which graphs are matching graphs of some graph is not known in general. We determine several forbidden induced subgraphs of matching graphs and add even cycles to the list of known matching graphs. In another direction, we study the behavior of sequences of iterated matching graphs. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Graph Theory 29: 73–86, 1998     

On the maximal eccentric connectivity indices of graphs

For a connected simple graph G, the eccentricity ec(v) of a vertex v in G is the distance from v to a vertex farthest from v, and d(v) denotes the degree of a vertex v. The eccentric connectivity index of G, denoted by ξc(G), is defined as v∈V(G)d(v)ec(v). In this paper, we will determine the graphs with maximal eccentric connectivity index among the connected graphs with n vertices and m edges(n ≤ m ≤ n + 4), and propose a conjecture on the graphs with maximal eccentric connectivity index among the connected graphs with n vertices and m edges(m ≥ n + 5).     

On the hole index of L(2,1)-labelings of r-regular graphs

An L(2,1)-labeling of a graph G is an assignment of nonnegative integers to the vertices of G so that adjacent vertices get labels at least distance two apart and vertices at distance two get distinct labels. A hole is an unused integer within the range of integers used by the labeling. The lambda number of a graph G, denoted λ(G), is the minimum span taken over all L(2,1)-labelings of G. The hole index of a graph G, denoted ρ(G), is the minimum number of holes taken over all L(2,1)-labelings with span exactly λ(G). Georges and Mauro [On the structure of graphs with non-surjective L(2,1)-labelings, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 19 (2005) 208-223] conjectured that if G is an r-regular graph and ρ(G)?1, then ρ(G) must divide r. We show that this conjecture does not hold by providing an infinite number of r-regular graphs G such that ρ(G) and r are relatively prime integers.     

Acyclic vertex coloring of graphs of maximum degree 5

An acyclic vertex coloring of a graph is a proper vertex coloring such that there are no bichromatic cycles. The acyclic chromatic number of G, denoted a(G), is the minimum number of colors required for acyclic vertex coloring of graph G. For a family F of graphs, the acyclic chromatic number of F, denoted by a(F), is defined as the maximum a(G) over all the graphs G∈F. In this paper we show that a(F)=8 where F is the family of graphs of maximum degree 5 and give a linear time algorithm to achieve this bound.     

Graphs with small boundary

For a pair of vertices x and y in a graph G, we denote by d_G(x,y) the distance between x and y in G. We call x a boundary vertex of y if x and y belong to the same component and d_G(y,v)?d_G(y,x) for each neighbor v of x in G. A boundary vertex of some vertex is simply called a boundary vertex, and the set of boundary vertices in G is called the boundary of G, and is denoted by B(G).In this paper, we investigate graphs with a small boundary. Since a pair of farthest vertices are boundary vertices, |B(G)|?2 for every connected graph G of order at least two. We characterize the graphs with boundary of order at most three. We cannot give a characterization of graphs with exactly four boundary vertices, but we prove that such graphs have minimum degree at most six. Finally, we give an upper bound to the minimum degree of a connected graph G in terms of |B(G)|.     

Some graft transformations and its applications on the distance spectral radius of a graph

Let D(G)=(d_i,j)_n×n denote the distance matrix of a connected graph G with order n, where d_ij is equal to the distance between v_i and v_j in G. The largest eigenvalue of D(G) is called the distance spectral radius of graph G, denoted by ?(G). In this paper, some graft transformations that decrease or increase ?(G) are given. With them, for the graphs with both order n and k pendant vertices, the extremal graphs with the minimum distance spectral radius are completely characterized; the extremal graph with the maximum distance spectral radius is shown to be a dumbbell graph (obtained by attaching some pendant edges to each pendant vertex of a path respectively) when 2≤k≤n−2; for k=1,2,3,n−1, the extremal graphs with the maximum distance spectral radius are completely characterized.     

Some graft transformations and its application on a distance spectrum

Let D(G)=(d_i,j)_n×n denote the distance matrix of a connected graph G with order n, where d_ij is equal to the distance between v_i and v_j in G. The largest eigenvalue of D(G) is called the distance spectral radius of graph G, denoted by ?(G). In this paper, we give some graft transformations that decrease and increase ?(G) and prove that the graph (obtained from the star S_n on n (n is not equal to 4, 5) vertices by adding an edge connecting two pendent vertices) has minimal distance spectral radius among unicyclic graphs on n vertices; while (obtained from a triangle K₃ by attaching pendent path P_n−3 to one of its vertices) has maximal distance spectral radius among unicyclic graphs on n vertices.     

Iterating the branching operation on a directed graph

The branching operation D, defined by Propp, assigns to any directed graph G another directed graph D(G) whose vertices are the oriented rooted spanning trees of the original graph G. We characterize the directed graphs G for which the sequence δ(G) = (G, D(G), D²(G),…) converges, meaning that it is eventually constant. As a corollary of the proof we get the following conjecture of Propp: for strongly connected directed graphs G, δ(G) converges if and only if D²(G) = D(G). © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Commuting Graphs of Matrix Algebras

The commuting graph of a ring R, denoted by Γ(R), is a graph whose vertices are all noncentral elements of R, and two distinct vertices x and y are adjacent if and only if xy = yx. The commuting graph of a group G, denoted by Γ(G), is similarly defined. In this article we investigate some graph-theoretic properties of Γ(M _n (F)), where F is a field and n ≥ 2. Also we study the commuting graphs of some classical groups such as GL _n (F) and SL _n (F). We show that Γ(M _n (F)) is a connected graph if and only if every field extension of F of degree n contains a proper intermediate field. We prove that apart from finitely many fields, a similar result is true for Γ(GL _n (F)) and Γ(SL _n (F)). Also we show that for two fields F and E and integers n, m ≥ 2, if Γ(M _n (F))?Γ(M _m (E)), then n = m and |F|=|E|.     

The eavesdropping number of a graph

Let G be a connected, undirected graph without loops and without multiple edges. For a pair of distinct vertices u and v, a minimum {u, v}-separating set is a smallest set of edges in G whose removal disconnects u and v. The edge connectivity of G, denoted λ(G), is defined to be the minimum cardinality of a minimum {u, v}-separating set as u and v range over all pairs of distinct vertices in G. We introduce and investigate the eavesdropping number, denoted ε(G), which is defined to be the maximum cardinality of a minimum {u, v}-separating set as u and v range over all pairs of distinct vertices in G. Results are presented for regular graphs and maximally locally connected graphs, as well as for a number of common families of graphs.     

ON A CONJECTURE ON nTH ORDER DEGREE REGULAR GRAPHS

Abstract

For n a positive integer and v a vertex of a graph G, the nth order degree of v in G, denoted by deg_nv, is the number of vertices at distance n from v. The graph G is said to be nth order regular of degree k if, for every vertex v of G, deg_nv = k. The following conjecture due to Alavi, Lick, and Zou is proved: For n ≥ 2, if G is a connected nth order regular graph of degree 1, then G is either a path of length 2n—1 or G has diameter n. Properties of nth order regular graphs of degree k, k ≥ 1, are investigated.     

On the size of graphs labeled with a condition at distance two

A labeling of graph G with a condition at distance two is an integer labeling of V(G) such that adjacent vertices have labels that differ by at least two, and vertices distance two apart have labels that differ by at least one. The lambda-number of G, λ(G), is the minimum span over all labelings of G with a condition at distance two. Let G(n, k) denote the set of all graphs with order n and lambda-number k. In this paper, we examine the sizes of graphs in G(n, k). We modify Chvàtal's result on non-hamiltonian graphs to obtain a formula for the minimum size of a graph in G(n, k), and we use an algorithmic approach to obtain a formula for the maximum size. Finally, we show that for any integer j between the maximum and minimum sizes there exists a graph with size j in G(n, k). © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

The diameter of paired-domination vertex critical graphs

In this paper we continue the study of paired-domination in graphs introduced by Haynes and Slater (Networks 32 (1998), 199–206). A paired-dominating set of a graph G with no isolated vertex is a dominating set of vertices whose induced subgraph has a perfect matching. The paired-domination number of G, denoted by γ _pr(G), is the minimum cardinality of a paired-dominating set of G. The graph G is paired-domination vertex critical if for every vertex v of G that is not adjacent to a vertex of degree one, γ _pr(G − v) < γ _pr(G). We characterize the connected graphs with minimum degree one that are paired-domination vertex critical and we obtain sharp bounds on their maximum diameter. We provide an example which shows that the maximum diameter of a paired-domination vertex critical graph is at least 3/2 (γ _pr(G) − 2). For γ _pr(G) ⩽ 8, we show that this lower bound is precisely the maximum diameter of a paired-domination vertex critical graph. The first author was supported in part by the South African National Research Foundation and the University of KwaZulu-Natal, the second author was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.     

Sharp bounds on distance spectral radius of graphs

Let D(G) denote the distance matrix of a connected graph G. The largest eigenvalue of D(G) is called the distance spectral radius of a graph G, denoted by ?(G). In this article, we give sharp upper and lower bounds for the distance spectral radius and characterize those graphs for which these bounds are best possible.