Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements

Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were used to describe suppression growth in normal-hearing humans. Data were collected at eight f(2) frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 8 kHz for L(2) levels ranging from 10 to 60 dB sensation level. For each f(2) and L(2) combination, suppression was measured for nine or eleven suppressor frequencies (f(3)) whose levels varied from -20 to 85 dB sound pressure level (SPL). Suppression grew nearly linearly when f(3) ≈ f(2), grew more rapidly for f(3)?< f(2), and grew more slowly for f(3)?> f(2). These results are consistent with physiological and mechanical data from lower animals, as well as previous DPOAE data from humans, although no previous DPOAE study has described suppression growth for as wide a range of frequencies and levels. These trends were evident for all f(2) and L(2) combinations; however, some exceptions were noted. Specifically, suppression growth rate was less steep as a function of f(3) for f(2) frequencies ≤ 1 kHz. Thus, despite the qualitative similarities across frequency, there were quantitative differences related to f(2), suggesting that there may be subtle differences in suppression for frequencies above 1 kHz compared to frequencies below 1 kHz.     

Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans

Distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression data as a function of suppressor level (L(3)) for f(2) frequencies from 0.5 to 8 kHz and L(2) levels from 10 to 60 dB sensation level were used to construct suppression tuning curves (STCs). DPOAE levels in the presence of suppressors were converted into decrement versus L(3) functions, and the L(3) levels resulting in 3 dB decrements were derived by transformed linear regression. These L(3) levels were plotted as a function of f(3) to construct STCs. When f(3) is represented on an octave scale, STCs were similar in shape across f(2) frequency. These STCs were analyzed to provide estimates of gain (tip-to-tail difference) and tuning (Q(ERB)). Both gain and tuning decreased as L(2) increased, regardless of f(2), but the trend with f(2) was not monotonic. A roughly linear relation was observed between gain and tuning at each frequency, such that gain increased by 4-16 dB (mean ≈ 5 dB) for every unit increase in Q(ERB), although the pattern varied with frequency. These findings suggest consistent nonlinear processing across a wide frequency range in humans, although the nonlinear operation range is frequency dependent.     

Evidence of upward spread of suppression in DPOAE measurements

Measurements of DPOAE level in the presence of a suppressor were used to describe a pattern that is qualitatively similar to population studies in the auditory nerve and to behavioral studies of upward spread of masking. DPOAEs were measured in the presence of a suppressor (f3) fixed at either 2.1 or 4.2 kHz, and set to each of seven levels (L3) from 20 to 80 dB SPL. In the presence of a fixed f3 and L3 combination, f2 was varied from about 1 oct below to at least 1/2 oct above f3, while L2 was set to each of 6 values (20-70 dB SPL). L1 was set according to the equation L1 = 0.4L2 + 39 [Janssen et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3418-3430 (1998)]. At each L2, L1 combination, DPOAE level was measured in a control condition in which no suppressor was presented. Data were converted into decrements (the amount of suppression, in dB) by subtracting the DPOAE level in the presence of each suppressor from the DPOAE level in the corresponding control condition. Plots of DPOAE decrements as a function of f2 showed maximum suppression when f2 approximately = f3. As L3 increased, the suppressive effect spread more towards higher f2 frequencies, with less spread towards lower frequencies relative to f3. DPOAE decrement versus L3 functions had steeper slopes when f2 > f3, compared to the slopes when f2 < f3. These data are consistent with other findings that have shown that response growth for a characteristic place (CP) or frequency (CF) depends on the relation between CP or CF and driver frequency, with steeper slopes when driver frequency is less than CF and shallower slopes when driver frequency is greater than CF. For a fixed amount of suppression (3 dB), L3 and L2 varied nearly linearly for conditions in which f3 approximately = f2, but grew more rapidly for conditions in which f3 < f2, reflecting the basal spread of excitation to the suppressor. The present data are similar in form to the results observed in population studies from the auditory nerve of lower animals and in behavioral masking studies in humans.     

Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans

Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression (quantified as decrements) was measured for f(2)=500 and 4000 Hz, for a range of primary levels (L(2)), suppressor frequencies (f(3)), and suppressor levels (L(3)) in 19 normal-hearing subjects. Slopes of decrement-versus-L(3) functions were similar at both f(2) frequencies, and decreased as f(3) increased. Suppression tuning curves, constructed from decrement functions, were used to estimate (1) suppression for on- and low-frequency suppressors, (2) tip-to-tail differences, (3) Q(ERB), and (4) best frequency. Compression, estimated from the slope of functions relating suppression "threshold" to L(2) for off-frequency suppressors, was similar for 500 and 4000 Hz. Tip-to-tail differences, Q(ERB), and best frequency decreased as L(2) increased for both frequencies. However, tip-to-tail difference (an estimate of cochlear-amplifier gain) was 20 dB greater at 4000 Hz, compared to 500 Hz. Q(ERB) decreased to a greater extent with L(2) when f(2)=4000 Hz, but, on an octave scale, best frequency shifted more with level when f(2)=500 Hz. These data indicate that, at both frequencies, cochlear processing is nonlinear. Response growth and compression are similar at the two frequencies, but gain is greater at 4000 Hz and spread of excitation is greater at 500 Hz.     

Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression measurements were made in 20 subjects with normal hearing and 21 subjects with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. The probe consisted of two primary tones (f2, f1), with f2 held constant at 4 kHz and f2/f1 = 1.22. Primary levels (L1, L2) were set according to the equation L1 = 0.4 L2 + 39 dB [Kummer et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3431-3444 (1998)], with L2 ranging from 20 to 70 dB SPL (normal-hearing subjects) and 50-70 dB SPL (subjects with hearing loss). Responses elicited by the probe were suppressed by a third tone (f3), varying in frequency from 1 octave below to 1/2 octave above f2. Suppressor level (L3) varied from 5 to 85 dB SPL. Responses in the presence of the suppressor were subtracted from the unsuppressed condition in order to convert the data into decrements (amount of suppression). The slopes of the decrement versus L3 functions were less steep for lower frequency suppressors and more steep for higher frequency suppressors in impaired ears. Suppression tuning curves, constructed by selecting the L3 that resulted in 3 dB of suppression as a function of f3, resulted in tuning curves that were similar in appearance for normal and impaired ears. Although variable, Q10 and Q(ERB) were slightly larger in impaired ears regardless of whether the comparisons were made at equivalent SPL or equivalent sensation levels (SL). Larger tip-to-tail differences were observed in ears with normal hearing when compared at either the same SPL or the same SL, with a much larger effect at similar SL. These results are consistent with the view that subjects with normal hearing and mild-to-moderate hearing loss have similar tuning around a frequency for which the hearing loss exists, but reduced cochlear-amplifier gain.     

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: cochlear-source contributions and clinical test performance

It has been proposed that the clinical accuracy of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) is affected by the interaction of distortion and reflection sources contributing to the response. This study evaluated changes in dichotomous-decision test performance and threshold-prediction accuracy when DPOAE source contribution was controlled. Data were obtained from 205 normal and impaired ears with L(2) ranging from 0 to 80 dB SPL and f(2)=2 and 4 kHz. Data were collected for control conditions (no suppressor, f(3)) and with f(3) presented at three levels that previously had been shown to reduce the reflection-source contribution. The results indicated that controlling source contribution with a suppressor did not improve diagnostic accuracy (as reflected by relative operating characteristic curve area) and frequently resulted in poorer test performance compared to control conditions. Likewise, correlations between DPOAE and behavioral thresholds were not strengthened when using the suppressors to control source contribution. While improvements in test accuracy were observed for a subset of subjects (normal ears with the smallest DPOAEs and impaired ears with the largest DPOAEs), the lack of improvement for the larger, unselected subject group suggests that DPOAEs should be recorded in the clinic without attempting to control the source contribution with a suppressor.     

Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions

Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) measured using a suppressor tone in human ears are analogous to two-tone suppression responses measured mechanically and neurally in mammalian cochleae. SFOAE suppression was measured in 24 normal-hearing adults at octave frequencies (f(p)=0.5-8.0 kHz) over a 40 dB range of probe levels (L(p)). Suppressor frequencies (f(s)) ranged from -2.0 to 0.7 octaves re: f(p), and suppressor levels ranged from just detectable suppression to full suppression. The lowest suppression thresholds occurred for "best" f(s) slightly higher than f(p). SFOAE growth of suppression (GOS) had slopes close to one at frequencies much lower than best f(s), and shallow slopes near best f(s), which indicated compressive growth close to 0.3 dBdB. Suppression tuning curves constructed from GOS functions were well defined at 1, 2, and 4 kHz, but less so at 0.5 and 8.0 kHz. Tuning was sharper at lower L(p) with an equivalent rectangular bandwidth similar to that reported behaviorally for simultaneous masking. The tip-to-tail difference assessed cochlear gain, increasing with decreasing L(p) and increasing f(p) at the lowest L(p) from 32 to 45 dB for f(p) from 1 to 4 kHz. SFOAE suppression provides a noninvasive measure of the saturating nonlinearities associated with cochlear amplification on the basilar membrane.     

Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are used widely in humans to assess cochlear function. The standard procedure consists of recording the 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude as a function of the f2 frequency, using a fixed f2/f1 ratio (DPOAE-gram), close to 1.20. DPOAE amplitude, as recorded in the DPOAE-gram, shows a wide range of values in normal-hearing subjects, which can impair the predictive value of the DPOAE-gram for hearing thresholds. This study is aimed at comparing intersubject variability in 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude according to three paradigms: a fixed f2/f1 ratio, such as the DPOAE-gram, a variable ratio DPOAE-gram (f2/f1 adapted to frequency) and an "optimum" DPOAE-gram, where the f2/f1 is adapted both to subject and frequency. The 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude has been investigated on 18 normally hearing subjects at ten different f2 frequencies (from 0.75 to 6 kHz), using an f2 fixed, f1 sweep paradigm, and allowed to define, for each frequency, the f2/f1 ratio giving the greatest 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude (or optimum ratio). Results showed a large intersubject variability of the optimum ratio, especially at frequencies below 1.5 kHz, and a significant decrease of the optimum ratio with frequency. The optimum DPOAE-gram was underestimated by up to 5.8 dB on average (up to 14.9 dB for an individual subject) by the fixed ratio DPOAE-gram, and by up to 3 dB on average (up to 10.6 dB for an individual subject) by the variable ratio DPOAE-gram. Intersubject variability was slightly but significantly reduced in the optimum DPOAE-gram versus the fixed-ratio DPOAE-gram. Lastly, correlations between tone-burst evoked otoacoustic emission (TBOAE) amplitudes and maximum DPOAE amplitudes were significantly greater than correlations between TBOAE amplitudes and fixed-ratio DPOAE amplitudes.     

The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears

The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of primary-tone level variation, L2--L1, on the amplitude of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The DPOAE at the frequency 2f1--f2 (f2 greater than f1) was measured in 20 ears of ten normally hearing subjects. Acoustic distortion products were generated by primaries f1 and f2 with geometric mean frequencies of 1, 2, and 4 kHz. The f2/f1 ratios were 1.25 (1 kHz), 1.23 (2 kHz), and 1.21 (4 kHz). The primary-tone level L1 was kept constant at either 65 or 75 dB SPL while the second primary-tone level L2 was varied between 20 and 90 dB SPL in 5-dB steps. The level differences L2--L1 generating maximal DPOAE amplitudes depended on L1 and on the geometric mean frequency of f1 and f2. There were large interindividual differences. Overall, the L2--L1 evoking maximal mean DPOAE amplitudes was --10 dB for geometric mean frequencies of 1 and 2 kHz with both L1 = 65 dB SPL and L1 = 75 dB SPL. For 4 kHz, L2-L1 was --5 dB with L1 = 65 dB SPL and 0 dB with L1 = 75 dB SPL. The mean slopes of the DPOAE growth functions in the initial linearly increasing portions were steeper at higher stimulus frequencies, increasing from 0.52 at 1 kHz to 0.72 at 4 kHz for L1 = 65 dB SPL and from 0.48 at 1 kHz to 0.72 at 4 kHz for L1 = 75 dB SPL.     

Hearing threshold estimation using concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady-state responses

Both distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) provide frequency-specific assessment of hearing. However, each method suffers from some restrictions. Hearing losses above 50 dB HL are not quantifiable using DPOAEs and their performance at frequencies below 1 kHz is limited, but their recording time is short. In contrast, ASSRs are a time-consuming method but have the ability to determine hearing thresholds in a wider range of frequencies and hearing losses. Thus, recording DPOAEs and ASSRs simultaneously at their adequate frequencies and levels could decrease the overall test time considerably. The goal of the present study was to develop a parameter-setting and test-protocol to measure DPOAEs and ASSRs binaurally and simultaneously at multiple frequencies. Ten normal-hearing and 23 hearing-impaired subjects participated in the study. The interaction of both responses when stimulated simultaneously at frequencies between 0.25 and 6 kHz was examined. Two limiting factors need to be kept. Frequency distance between ASSR carrier frequency f(c) and DPOAE primary tone f(2) needs to be at least 1.5 octaves, and DPOAEs may not be measured if the ASSR stimulus level is 70 dB SPL or above. There was a significant correlation between pure-tone and DPOAE/ASSR-thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss ears.     

Combined effect of two suppressors

Threshold for a 10-ms sinusoidal signal was measured as a function of signal frequency (0.65 to 1.40 kHz) in several forward-masking conditions. For signal frequencies near 1.0 kHz, the forward masking produced by a 395-ms, 100-Hz-wide noise centered at 1.0 kHz (total power 60 dB) could be reduced by the addition of a sinusoid to the noise. The effects of four sinusoidal suppressors (frequencies of 0.70, 0.85, 1.15, and 1.40 kHz, all at 75 dB SPL) were examined individually and in the six possible pairwise combinations. In general, the threshold reduction produced by two suppressors together was no greater than the larger of the reductions produced by the suppressors individually. It appears that suppression produced by different stimuli does not combine to yield significantly larger effects. Instead, the amount of suppression appears to be restricted to a specific range and it is not possible to exceed this limit.     

Sources of DPOAEs revealed by suppression experiments,inverse fast Fourier transforms,and SFOAEs in impaired ears

DPOAE sources are modeled by intermodulation distortion generated near the f2 place and a reflection of this distortion near the DP place. In a previous paper, inverse fast Fourier transforms (IFFTs) of DPOAE filter functions in normal ears were consistent with this model [Konrad-Martin et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 2862-2879 (2001)]. In the present article, similar measurements were made in ears with specific hearing-loss configurations. It was hypothesized that hearing loss at f2 or DP frequencies would influence the relative contributions to the DPOAE from the corresponding basilar membrane places, and would affect the relative magnitudes of SFOAEs at frequencies equal to f2 and fDP. DPOAEs were measured with f2 = 4 kHz, f1 varied, and a suppressor near fDP. L2 was 25-55 dB SPL (L1 = L2 + 10 dB). SFOAEs were measured at f2 and at 2.7 kHz (the average fDP produced by the f1 sweep) for stimulus levels of 20-60 dB SPL. SFOAE results supported predictions of the pattern of amplitude differences between SFOAEs at 4 and 2.7 kHz for sloping losses, but did not support predictions for the rising- and flat-loss categories. Unsuppressed IFFTs for rising losses typically had one peak. IFFTs for flat or sloping losses typically have two or more peaks; later peaks were more prominent in ears with sloping losses compared to normal ears. Specific predictions were unambiguously supported by the results for only four of ten cases, and were generally supported in two additional cases. Therefore, the relative contributions of the two DPOAE sources often were abnormal in impaired ears, but not always in the predicted manner.     

Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression growth in normal and noise-exposed rabbits

This study investigated noise-induced changes in suppression growth (SG) of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Detailed measurements of SG were obtained in rabbits as a function of f2 frequencies at four primary-tone levels. SG measures were produced by using suppressor tones (STs) presented at two fixed distances from f2. The magnitude of suppression was calculated for each ST level and depicted as contour plots showing the amount of suppression as a function of the f2 frequency. At each f2, SG indices included slope, suppression threshold, and an estimate of the tip-to-tail value. All suppression measures were obtained before and after producing a cochlear dysfunction using a monaural exposure to a 2-h, 110-dB SPL octave-band noise centered at 2 kHz. The noise exposure produced varying amounts of cochlear damage as revealed by changes in DP-grams and auditory brainstem responses. However, average measures of SG slopes, suppression thresholds, and tip-to-tail values failed to mirror the mean DP-gram loss patterns. When suppression-based parameters were correlated with the amount of DPOAE loss, small but significant correlations were observed for some measures. Overall, the findings suggest that measures derived from DPOAE SG are limited in their ability to detect noise-induced cochlear damage.     

Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: Sex and race differences

Both distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and performance in an auditory-masking task involving combination tones were measured in the same frequency region in the same ears. In the behavioral task, a signal of 3.6?kHz (duration 300?ms, rise/fall time 20?ms) was masked by a 3.0-kHz tone (62?dB SPL, continuously presented). These two frequencies can produce a combination tone at 2.4?kHz. When a narrowband noise (2.0-2.8?kHz, 17?dB spectrum level) was added as a second masker, detection of the 3.6-kHz signal worsened by 6-9?dB (the Greenwood effect), revealing that listeners had been using the combination tone at 2.4?kHz as a cue for detection at 3.6?kHz. Several outcomes differed markedly by sex and racial background. The Greenwood effect was substantially larger in females than in males, but only for the White group. When the magnitude of the Greenwood effect was compared with the magnitude of the DPOAE measured in the 2.4?kHz region, the correlations typically were modest, but were high for Non-White males. For many subjects, then, most of the DPOAE measured in the ear canal apparently is not related to the combination-tone cue that is masked by the narrowband noise.     

Two-tone suppression in the cricket, Eunemobius carolinus (Gryllidae, Nemobiinae)

Sounds with frequencies >15 kHz elicit an acoustic startle response (ASR) in flying crickets (Eunemobius carolinus). Although frequencies <15 kHz do not elicit the ASR when presented alone, when presented with ultrasound (40 kHz), low-frequency stimuli suppress the ultrasound-induced startle. Thus, using methods similar to those in masking experiments, we used two-tone suppression to assay sensitivity to frequencies in the audio band. Startle suppression was tuned to frequencies near 5 kHz, the frequency range of male calling songs. Similar to equal loudness contours measured in humans, however, equal suppression contours were not parallel, as the equivalent rectangular bandwidth of suppression tuning changed with increases in ultrasound intensity. Temporal integration of suppressor stimuli was measured using nonsimultaneous presentations of 5-ms pulses of 6 and 40 kHz. We found that no suppression occurs when the suppressing tone is >2 ms after and >5 ms before the ultrasound stimulus, suggesting that stimulus overlap is a requirement for suppression. When considered together with our finding that the intensity of low-frequency stimuli required for suppression is greater than that produced by singing males, the overlap requirement suggests that two-tone suppression functions to limit the ASR to sounds containing only ultrasound and not to broadband sounds that span the audio and ultrasound range.     

Level dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions measured at high frequencies in humans

Given that high-frequency hearing is most vulnerable to cochlear pathology, it is important to characterize distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) measured with higher-frequency stimuli in order to utilize these measures in clinical applications. The purpose of this study was to explore the dependence of DPOAE amplitude on the levels of the evoking stimuli at frequencies greater than 8 kHz, and make comparisons with those data that have been extensively measured with lower-frequency stimuli. To accomplish this, DPOAE amplitudes were measured at six different f2 frequencies (2, 5, 10, 12, 14, and 16 kHz), with a frequency ratio (f2/f1) of 1.2, at five fixed levels (30 to 70 dB SPL) of one primary (either f1 or f2), while the other primary was varied in level (30 to 70 dB SPL). Generally, the level separation between the two primary tones (L1 > L2) generating the largest DPOAE amplitude (referred to as the "optimal level separation") decreased as the level of the fixed primary increased. Additionally, the optimal level separation was frequency dependent, especially at the lower fixed primary tone levels ( < or = 50 dB SPL). In agreement with previous studies, the DPOAE level exhibited greater dependence on L1 than on L2.     

20 Hz~10 kHz光纤水听器相移灵敏度校准

利用相位生成载波解调技术精确测量光纤水听器的光相移量,在20 Hz~10 kHz频率范围实现了光纤水听器探头相移灵敏度的校准.20 Hz~1.25 kHz频段采用驻波管比较法进行校准,1.25 kHz~10 kHz频段采用自由场脉冲比较法进行校准.利用本文建立的校准系统,对TMD 35#光纤水听器的相移灵敏度进行校准,校准结果表明,两种方法测得的相移灵敏度具有很好的一致性,在1.25 kHz频率点的相移灵敏度值偏差为0.8 dB.不确定度分析表明,该校准系统的扩展不确定度(k=2)为0.9 dB.     

The effects of a high-frequency suppressor on tuning curves and derived basilar-membrane response functions

Forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves were obtained using a fixed, low-level signal at a frequency of 4 kHz, and masker frequencies of 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 3.75, 4.0, 4.25, 4.5, 4.75, 5.0, and 5.5 kHz, at masker-signal gaps of 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, and 100 ms. An adaptive two-interval, two alternative forced-choice (21-2AFC) procedure was used to obtain the masker level at threshold. This procedure was repeated with the addition of a 4.75-kHz suppressor at 50 or 60 dB SPL, gated with the masker. Tuning curves were broader, and estimates of compression and gain from derived input/output functions were decreased in the presence of a suppressor as compared to the no-suppressor condition. The results are consistent with physiological results, which show that suppression leads to a broadening of tuning curves and a partial linearization of the midlevel portion of the basilar-membrane input/output function.     

Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears

A new method for direct pure-tone threshold estimation from input/output functions of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in humans is presented. Previous methods use statistical models relating DPOAE level to hearing threshold including additional parameters e.g., age or slope of DPOAE I/O-function. Here we derive a DPOAE threshold from extrapolated DPOAE I/O-functions directly. Cubic 2 f1-f2 distortion products and pure-tone threshold at f2 were measured at 51 frequencies between f2=500 Hz and 8 kHz at up to ten primary tone levels between L2=65 and 20 dB SPL in 30 normally hearing and 119 sensorineural hearing loss ears. Using an optimized primary tone level setting (L1 = 0.4L2 + 39 dB) that accounts for the nonlinear interaction of the two primaries at the DPOAE generation site at f2, the pressure of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product pDP is a linear function of the primary tone level L2. Linear regression yields correlation coefficients higher than 0.8 in the majority of the DPOAE I/O-functions. The linear behavior is sufficiently fulfilled for all frequencies in normal and impaired hearing. This suggests that the observed linear functional dependency is quite general. Extrapolating towards pDP=0 yields the DPOAE threshold for L2. There is a significant correlation between DPOAE threshold and pure-tone threshold (r=0.65, p<0.001). Thus, the DPOAEs that reflect the functioning of an essential element of peripheral sound processing enable a reliable estimation of cochlear hearing threshold up to hearing losses of 50 dBHL without any statistical data.     

Breaking away: violation of distortion emission phase-frequency invariance at low frequencies

The phase versus frequency function of the distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) at 2f(1) - f(2) is approximately invariant at frequencies above 1.5 kHz in human subjects when recorded with a constant f(2)/f(1). However, a secular break from this invariance has been observed at lower frequencies where the phase-gradient becomes markedly steeper. Apical DPOAEs, such as 2f(1)?- f(2), are known to contain contributions from multiple sources. This experiment asked whether the phase behavior of the ear canal DPOAE at low frequencies is driven by the phase of the component from the distortion product (DP) region at 2f(1)?- f(2), which exhibits rapid phase accumulation. Placing a suppressor tone close in the frequency to 2f(1)?- f(2) reduced the contribution of this component to the ear canal DPOAE in normal-hearing adult human ears. When the contribution of this component was reduced, the phase behavior of the ear canal DPOAE was not altered, suggesting that the breaking from DPOAE phase invariance at low frequencies is an outcome of apical-basal differences in cochlear mechanics. The deviation from DPOAE phase invariance appears to be a manifestation of the breaking from approximate scaling symmetry in the human cochlear apex.