Isolation and Characterization,Including by X‐ray Crystallography,of Contact and Solvent‐Separated Ion Pairs of Silenyl Lithium Species

Reaction of bromoacylsilane 1 (pink solution) with tBu₂MeSiLi (3.5 equiv) in a 4:1 hexane:THF solvent mixture at −78 °C to room temperature yields the solvent separated ion pair (SSIP) of silenyl lithium E‐[(tBuMe₂Si)(tBu₂MeSi)C=Si(SiMetBu₂)]⁻ [Li⋅4THF]⁺ 2 a (green–blue solution). Removal of the solvent and addition of benzene converts 2 a into the corresponding contact ion pair (CIP) 2 b (violet–red solution) with two THF molecules bonded to the lithium atom. The 2 a ⇌ 2 b interconversion is reversible upon THF⇌ benzene solvent change. Both 2 a and 2 b were characterized by X‐ray crystallography, NMR and UV/Vis spectroscopy, and theoretical calculations. The degree of dissociation of the Si−Li bond has a large effect on the visible spectrum (and thus color) and on the silenylic ²⁹Si NMR chemical shift, but a small effect on the molecular structure. This is the first report of the X‐ray molecular structure of both the SSIP and the CIP of any R₂E=E′RM species (E=C, Si; E′=C, Si; M=metal).     

Trapping a Silicon(I) Radical with Carbenes: A Cationic cAAC–Silicon(I) Radical and an NHC–Parent‐Silyliumylidene Cation

The trapping of a silicon(I) radical with N‐heterocyclic carbenes is described. The reaction of the cyclic (alkyl)(amino) carbene [cAAC_Me] (cAAC_Me=:C(CMe₂)₂(CH₂)NAr, Ar=2,6‐i Pr₂C₆H₃) with H₂SiI₂ in a 3:1 molar ratio in DME afforded a mixture of the separated ion pair [(cAAC_Me)₂Si:^.]⁺I⁻ ( 1 ), which features a cationic cAAC–silicon(I) radical, and [cAAC_Me−H]⁺I⁻. In addition, the reaction of the NHC–iodosilicon(I) dimer [I_Ar(I)Si:]₂ (I_Ar=:C{N(Ar)CH}₂) with 4 equiv of I_Me (:C{N(Me)CMe}₂), which proceeded through the formation of a silicon(I) radical intermediate, afforded [(I_Me)₂SiH]⁺I⁻ ( 2 ) comprising the first NHC–parent‐silyliumylidene cation. Its further reaction with fluorobenzene afforded the C_Ar−H bond activation product [1‐F‐2‐I_Me‐C₆H₄]⁺I⁻ ( 3 ). The isolation of 2 and 3 confirmed the reaction mechanism for the formation of 1 . Compounds 1 – 3 were analyzed by EPR and NMR spectroscopy, DFT calculations, and X‐ray crystallography.     

Reactive Dimerization of an N‐Heterocyclic Plumbylene: C−H Activation with PbII

The N‐heterocyclic plumbylene [Fe{(η⁵‐C₅H₄)NSiMe₃}₂Pb:] is in equilibrium with an unprecedented dimer in solution, whose formation involves the cleavage of a strong C?H bond and concomitant formation of a Pb?C and an N?H bond. According to a mechanistic DFT assessment, dimer formation does not involve direct Pb^II insertion into a cyclopentadienyl C?H bond, but is best described as an electrophilic substitution. The bulkier plumbylene [Fe{(η⁵‐C₅H₄)NSitBuMe₂}₂Pb:] shows no dimerization, but compensates its electrophilicity by the formation of an intramolecular Fe?Pb bond.