Coordination Adducts of Niobium(V) and Tantalum(V) Azide M(N3)5 (M=Nb,Ta) with Nitrogen Donor Ligands and their Self‐Ionization

Several new donor–acceptor adducts of niobium and tantalum pentaazide with N‐donor ligands have been prepared from the pentafluorides by fluoride–azide exchange with Me₃SiN₃ in the presence of the corresponding donor ligand. With 2,2′‐bipyridine and 1,10‐phenanthroline, the self‐ionization products [MF₄(2,2′‐bipy)₂]⁺[M(N₃)₆]^?, [M(N₃)₄(2,2′‐bipy)₂]⁺[M(N₃)₆]^? and [M(N₃)₄(1,10‐phen)₂]⁺[M(N₃)₆]^? were obtained. With the donor ligands 3,3′‐bipyridine and 4,4′‐bipyridine the neutral pentaazide adducts (M(N₃)₅)₂?L (M=Nb, Ta; L=3,3′‐bipy, 4,4′‐bipy) were formed.     

Three Novel Mixed‐ligand Cadmium(II) Sulfonates with Aza‐aromatic Skeltons as Co‐ligands

To survey the influence of aza‐aromatic co‐ligands on the structure of Cadmium(II) sulfonates, three Cd(II) complexes with mixed‐ligand, [Cd^II(ANS)₂(phen)₂] ( 1 ), [Cd^II(ANS)₂(2,2′‐bipy)₂] ( 2 ) and [Cd^II(ANS)₂(4,4′‐bipy)₂]_n ( 3 ) (ANS = 2‐aminonaphthalene‐1‐sulfonate; phen = 1,10‐phenanthroline; 2,2′‐bipy = 2,2′‐bipyridine; 4,4′‐bipy = 4,4′‐bipyridine) were synthesized by hydrothermal methods and structurally characterized by elemental analyses, IR spectra, and single crystal X‐ray diffraction. Of the three complexes, ANS consistently coordinates to Cd²⁺ ion as a monodentate ligand. While phen in 1 and 2,2′‐bipy in 2 act as N,N‐bidentate chelating ligands, leading to the formation of a discrete mononuclear unit; 4,4′‐bipy in 3 bridges two Cd^II atoms in bis‐monodentate fashion to produce a 2‐D layered network, suggesting that the conjugate skeleton and the binding site of the co‐ligands have a moderate effect on molecular structure, crystal stacking pattern, and intramolecular weak interactions. In addition, the three complexes exhibit similar luminescent emissions originate from the transitions between the energy levels of sulfonate anions.     

Bis[tris­(2,2′‐bipyridine)iron(II)] tetra­aqua­sodium(I) dodeca­tungsto­ferrate(III) dihydrate

The title compound, bis­[tris­(2,2′‐bipyridine)iron(II)] tetra­aqua­tetra‐μ₄‐oxo‐penta­cosa‐μ₂‐oxo‐undeca­oxo­iron(III)sodium(I)­dodeca­tungsten(VI) dihydrate, [Fe(C₁₀H₈N₂)₃]₂[NaFeW₁₂O₄₀(H₂O)₄]·2H₂O, consists of a dodeca­tungstoferrate(III) framework grafted on to an [Na(H₂O)₄]⁺ cation, two complex [Fe(2,2′‐bipy)₃]²⁺ cations (2,2′‐bipy is 2,2′‐bipyridine) and two uncoordinated water mol­ecules per formula unit.     

The First Molybdenum(VI) and Tungsten(VI) Oxoazides MO2(N3)2, MO2(N3)2⋅2 CH3CN, (bipy)MO2(N3)2, and [MO2(N3)4]2− (M=Mo,W)

Molybdenum(VI) and tungsten(VI) dioxodiazide, MO₂(N₃)₂ (M=Mo, W), were prepared through fluoride–azide exchange reactions between MO₂F₂ and Me₃SiN₃ in SO₂ solution. In acetonitrile solution, the fluoride–azide exchange resulted in the isolation of the adducts MO₂(N₃)₂⋅2 CH₃CN. The subsequent reaction of MO₂(N₃)₂ with 2,2′‐bipyridine (bipy) gave the bipyridine adducts (bipy)MO₂(N₃)₂. The hydrolysis of (bipy)MoO₂(N₃)₂ resulted in the formation and isolation of [(bipy)MoO₂N₃]₂O. The tetraazido anions [MO₂(N₃)₄]²⁻ were obtained by the reaction of MO₂(N₃)₂ with two equivalents of ionic azide. Most molybdenum(VI) and tungsten(VI) dioxoazides were fully characterized by their vibrational spectra, impact, friction, and thermal sensitivity data and, in the case of (bipy)MoO₂(N₃)₂, (bipy)WO₂(N₃)₂, [PPh₄]₂[MoO₂(N₃)₄], [PPh₄]₂[WO₂(N₃)₄], and [(bipy)MoO₂N₃]₂O by their X‐ray crystal structures.     

The First Molybdenum(VI) and Tungsten(VI) Oxoazides MO2(N3)2, MO2(N3)2⋅2 CH3CN, (bipy)MO2(N3)2, and [MO2(N3)4]2− (M=Mo,W)

Molybdenum(VI) and tungsten(VI) dioxodiazide, MO₂(N₃)₂ (M=Mo, W), were prepared through fluoride–azide exchange reactions between MO₂F₂ and Me₃SiN₃ in SO₂ solution. In acetonitrile solution, the fluoride–azide exchange resulted in the isolation of the adducts MO₂(N₃)₂⋅2 CH₃CN. The subsequent reaction of MO₂(N₃)₂ with 2,2′‐bipyridine (bipy) gave the bipyridine adducts (bipy)MO₂(N₃)₂. The hydrolysis of (bipy)MoO₂(N₃)₂ resulted in the formation and isolation of [(bipy)MoO₂N₃]₂O. The tetraazido anions [MO₂(N₃)₄]²⁻ were obtained by the reaction of MO₂(N₃)₂ with two equivalents of ionic azide. Most molybdenum(VI) and tungsten(VI) dioxoazides were fully characterized by their vibrational spectra, impact, friction, and thermal sensitivity data and, in the case of (bipy)MoO₂(N₃)₂, (bipy)WO₂(N₃)₂, [PPh₄]₂[MoO₂(N₃)₄], [PPh₄]₂[WO₂(N₃)₄], and [(bipy)MoO₂N₃]₂O by their X‐ray crystal structures.     

Two New Lead(II) Coordination Polymers with (Substituted) Bipyridine and Auxiliary Nitrate Ligands

The reaction of lead(II) nitrate with 4,4′‐bipyridine (4,4′‐bpy) and 4,4′‐dimethyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine (4,4′‐dm‐2,2′‐bpy) or 5,5′‐dimethyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine (5,5′‐dm‐2,2′‐bpy) resulted in the fomation of single crystals of [Pb₂(4,4′‐bpy)(5,5′‐dm‐2,2′‐bpy)₂(NO₃)₄] ( 1 ) and [Pb₃(4,4′‐bpy)₂(4,4′‐dm‐2,2′‐bpy)₂(NO₃)₆] ( 2 ). The new compounds have been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction structure analysis as well as through elemental analysis, IR, ¹H‐NMR and ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy and their stability has been studied by thermal analysis. In the crystal structure of ( 1 ) formula‐like dimers are further connected to a 2‐D network through the auxiliary nitrate ligands. The crystal structure of ( 2 ) exhibits two crystallographically independent Pb^II central atoms (in a ratio of 1:2). With the aid of the 4,4′‐bpy and the nitrate ions, a 3‐D polymeric structure is achieved.     

Shielding of Electron Acceptors Coordinated to Rhenium(I) by Carboxylato Groups. Intraligand and Charge‐Transfer Excited‐State Properties of fac‐(‘Anthraquinone‐2‐carboxylato')(2,2′‐bipyridine)tricarbonylrhenium (fac‐[ReI(aq‐2‐CO2)(2,2′‐bipy)(CO)3])

The photophysical and photochemical properties of (OC‐6‐33)‐(2,2′‐bipyridine‐κN¹,κN¹′)tricarbonyl(9,10‐dihydro‐9,10‐dioxoanthracene‐2‐carboxylato‐κO)rhenium (fac‐[Re^I(aq‐2‐CO₂)(2,2′‐bipy)(CO)₃]) were investigated and compared to those of the free ligand 9,10‐dihydro‐9,10‐dioxoanthracene‐2‐carboxylate (=anthraquinone‐2‐carboxylate) and other carboxylato complexes containing the (2,2′‐bipyridine)tricarbonylrhenium ([Re(2,2′‐bipy)(CO)₃]) moiety. Flash and steady‐state irradiations of the anthraquinone‐derived ligand (λ_exc 337 or 351 nm) and of its complex reveal that the photophysics of the latter is dominated by processes initiated in the Re‐to‐(2,2′‐bipyridine) charge‐transfer excited state and 2,2′‐bipyridine‐ and (anthraquinone‐2‐carboxylato)‐centered intraligand excited states. In the reductive quenching by N,N‐diethylethanamine (TEA) or 2,2′,2″‐nitrilotris[ethanol] TEOA, the reactive states are the 2,2′‐bipyridine‐centered and/or the charge‐transfer excited states. The species with a reduced anthraquinone moiety is formed by the following intramolecular electron transfer, after the redox quenching of the excited state: [Re^I(aq−2−CO₂)(2,2′‐bipy^.)(CO)₃]⁻⇌[Re^I(aq−2−CO₂^.)(2,2′‐bipy)(CO)₃]⁻ The photophysics, particularly the absence of a Re^I‐to‐anthraquinone charge‐transfer excited state photochemistry, is discussed in terms of the electrochemical and photochemical results.     

Selective Endo and Exo Binding of Mono‐ and Ditopic Ligands to a Rhomboidal Diporphyrin Prism

Copper(I) can preferentially form heteroleptic complexes containing two phosphine and two nitrogen donors due to steric factors. This preference was employed to direct the self‐assembly of a porphyrin‐faced rhomboidal prism having two parallel tetrakis(4‐iminopyridyl)porphyrinatozinc(II) faces linked by eight 1,4‐bis(diphenylphosphino)benzene pillars. The coordination preferences of the Cu^I ions and geometries of the ligands come together to generate a slipped‐cofacial orientation of the porphyrinatozinc(II) faces. This orientation enables selective encapsulation of 3,3′‐bipyridine (bipy), which bridges the Zn^II ions of the parallel porphyrins, whereas 4,4′‐bipy exhibits weaker external coordination to the porphyrin faces. Reaction with 2,2′‐bipy, by contrast, results in the displacement of the tetratopic porphyrin ligand and formation of [{(2,2′‐bipy)Cu^I}₂(diphosphine)₂]. The differing strengths of interactions of bipyridine isomers with the system allows for a hierarchy to be deciphered, whereby 4,4′‐bipy may be displaced by 3,3′‐bipy, which in turn is displaced by 2,2′‐bipy.     

Spectroscopic,Thermal and Structural Studies of Aza‐aromatic Base Adducts of Cadmium Furoyltrifluoroacetonate

Three aza‐aromatic base adducts of cadmium(II) furoyltrifluoroacetonate, [Cd(4,4′‐bpy)(ftfa)₂]_n ( 1 ), [Cd(2,2′‐bpy)(ftfa)₂] ( 2 ) and [Cd(dmp)(ftfa)₂] ( 3 ) (“4,4′‐bpy”, “2,2′‐bpy”, “dmp” and “ftfa” are the abbreviations of 4,4′‐bipyridine, 2,2′‐bipyridine, 2,9‐dimethyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline and furoyltrifluoroacetonate, respectively) have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis and IR, ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and studied by thermal as well as X‐ray crystallography. The single‐crystal structure of these complexes shows that the coordination number of the Cd^II ions are six with two N‐donor atoms from aza‐aromatic base ligands and four O‐donors from two the furoyltrifluoroacetonates. The supramolecular features in these complexes are guided/controlled by weak directional intermolecular interactions.     

The Vanadium(V) Oxoazides [VO(N3)3], [(bipy)VO(N3)3], and [VO(N3)5]2−

Vanadium(V) oxoazide [VO(N₃)₃] was prepared through a fluoride–azide exchange reaction between [VOF₃] and Me₃SiN₃ in acetonitrile solution. When the highly impact‐ and friction‐sensitive compound [VO(N₃)₃] was reacted with 2,2′‐bipyridine, the adduct [(bipy)VO(N₃)₃] was isolated. The reaction of [VO(N₃)₃] with [PPh₄]N₃ resulted in the formation and isolation of the salt [PPh₄]₂[VO(N₃)₅]. The adduct [(bipy)VO(N₃)₃] and the salt [PPh₄]₂₃[VO(N₃)₅] were characterized by vibrational spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray structure determination, making these compounds the first structurally characterized vanadium(V) azides.     

Stabilization of [WF5]+ by Bidentate N‐Donor Ligands

Transition‐metal hexafluorides do not exhibit fluoride‐ion donor properties in the absence of donor ligands. We report the first synthesis of donor‐stabilized [MF₅]⁺ derived from a transition‐metal hexafluoride via fluoride‐ion abstraction using WF₆(L) (L=2,2′‐bipy, 1,10‐phen) and SbF₅(OSO) in SO₂. The [WF₅(L)][Sb₂F₁₁] salts and [WF₅(1,10‐phen)][SbF₆]?SO₂ have been characterized by X‐ray crystallography, Raman spectroscopy, and multinuclear NMR spectroscopy. The reaction of WF₆(2,2′‐bipy) with an equimolar amount of SbF₅(OSO) reveals an equilibrium between [WF₅(2,2′‐bipy)]⁺ and the [WF₄(2,2′‐bipy)₂]²⁺ dication, as determined by ¹⁹F NMR spectroscopy. The geometries of the cations in the solid state are reproduced by gas‐phase geometry optimizations (DFT‐B3LYP), and NBO analyses reveal that the positive charges of the cations are stabilized primarily by compensatory σ‐electron donation from the N‐donor ligands.     

(4,4′‐Bipyridine)mercury(II) Coordination Polymers,Syntheses, and Structures

Mercury(II) complexes with 4,4′‐bipyridine (4,4′‐bipy) ligand were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, and IR, ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy. The structures of the complexes [Hg₃(4,4′‐bipy)₂(CH₃COO)₂(SCN)₄]_n ( 1 ), [Hg₅(4,4′‐bipy)₅(SCN)₁₀]_n ( 2 ), [Hg₂(4,4′‐bipy)₂(CH₃COO)₂]_n(ClO₄)_2n ( 3 ), and [Hg(4,4′‐bipy)I₂]_n ( 4 ) were determined by X‐ray crystallography. The single‐crystal X‐ray data show that 2 and 4 are one‐dimensional zigzag polymers with four‐coordinate Hg‐atoms, whereas 1 is a one‐dimensional helical chain with two four‐coordinate and one six‐coordinate Hg‐atom. Complex 3 is a two‐dimensional polymer with a five‐coordinate Hg‐atom. These results show the capacity of the Hg‐ion to act as a soft acid that is capable to form compounds with coordination numbers four, five, and six and consequently to produce different forms of coordination polymers, containing one‐ and two‐dimensional networks.     

Synthesis,structure and selective luminescence sensing for iron(III) ions of a three‐dimensional zinc(II) (4,6)‐connected coordination network

Coordination polymers constructed from conjugated organic ligands and metal ions with a d¹⁰ electronic configuration exhibit intriguing properties for chemical sensing and photochemistry. A Zn^II‐based coordination polymer, namely poly[aqua(μ₆‐biphenyl‐3,3′,5,5′‐tetracarboxylato)(μ₂‐4,4′‐bipyridine)dizinc(II)], [Zn₂(C₁₆H₆O₈)(C₁₀H₈N₂)(H₂O)₂]_n or [Zn₂(m,m‐bpta)(4,4′‐bipy)(H₂O)₂]_n, was synthesized from a mixture of biphenyl‐3,3′,5,5′‐tetracarboxylic acid [H₄(m,m‐bpta)], 4,4′‐bipyridine (4,4′‐bipy) and Zn(NO₃)₂·6H₂O under solvothermal conditions. The title complex has been structurally characterized by IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and powder X‐ray diffraction analysis, and features a μ₆‐coordination mode. The Zn^II ions adopt square‐pyramidal geometries and are bridged by two syn–syn carboxylate groups to form [Zn₂(COO)₂] secondary buildding units (SBUs). The SBUs are crosslinked by (m,m‐bpta)^4? ligands to produce a two‐dimensional grid‐like layer that exhibits a stair‐like structure along the a axis. Adjacent layers are linked by 4,4′‐bipy ligands to form a three‐dimensional network with a {4⁴.6¹⁰.8}{4⁴.6²} topology. In the solid state, the complex displays a strong photoluminescence and an excellent solvent stability. In addition, the luminescence sensing results indicate a highly selective and sensitive sensing for Fe³⁺ ions.     

Poly[diaqua­(μ‐4,4′‐bipyridine)tetra­kis­(μ‐ferro­cenecarboxyl­ato)bis­(ferro­cenecarboxyl­ato)­tri­man­ganese(II)]

The title compound, [Mn₃Fe₆(C₅H₅)₆(C₆H₄O₂)₆(C₁₀H₈N₂)(H₂O)₂]_n, consists of two crystallographically unique Mn^II centers. One is situated on an inversion center and is octa­hedrally coordinated by two N atoms from two bridging 4,4′‐bipyridine (4,4′‐bipy) ligands and four O atoms, two from different bridging ferrocenecarboxyl­ate (μ₂‐FcCOO⁻; Fc is ferrocene) units and two from aqua ligands. The two halves of each 4,4′‐bipy ligand are related by a center of symmetry. The second Mn^II center is in a strongly distorted tetra­gonal–pyramidal geometry, coordinated by five O atoms, three from three μ₂‐FcCOO⁻ units and two from a fourth, chelating, η²‐FcCOO⁻ unit. The FcCOO⁻ units function as bridging ligands to adjacent Mn^II centers, leading to the formation of linear ⋯Mn1Mn2Mn2Mn1⋯ chains. Adjacent chains are further bridged by 4,4′‐bipy ligands, resulting in a two‐dimensional layered polymer.     

The Molybdenum(V) and Tungsten(VI) Oxoazides [MoO(N3)3], [MoO(N3)3⋅2 CH3CN], [(bipy)MoO(N3)3], [MoO(N3)5]2−, [WO(N3)4], and [WO(N3)4⋅CH3CN]

A series of novel molybdenum(V) and tungsten(VI) oxoazides was prepared starting from [MOF₄] (M=Mo, W) and Me₃SiN₃. While [WO(N₃)₄] was formed through fluoride–azide exchange in the reaction of Me₃SiN₃ with WOF₄ in SO₂ solution, the reaction with MoOF₄ resulted in a reduction of Mo^VI to Mo^V and formation of [MoO(N₃)₃]. Carried out in acetonitrile solution, these reactions resulted in the isolation of the corresponding adducts [MoO(N₃)₃?2 CH₃CN] and [WO(N₃)₄?CH₃CN]. Subsequent reactions of [MoO(N₃)₃] with 2,2′‐bipyridine and [PPh₄][N₃] resulted in the formation and isolation of [(bipy)MoO(N₃)₃] and [PPh₄]₂[MoO(N₃)₅], respectively. Most molybdenum(V) and tungsten(VI) oxoazides were fully characterized by their vibrational spectra, impact, friction and thermal sensitivity data and, in the case of [WO(N₃)₄?CH₃CN], [(bipy)MoO(N₃)₃], and [PPh₄]₂[MoO(N₃)₅], by their X‐ray crystal structures.     

μ‐4,4′‐Bipyridine‐κ2N:N′‐bis[triaqua(4,4′‐bipyridine‐κN)cadmium(II)] bis(3‐aminobenzoate) bis(perchlorate) dihydrate: a novel supramolecular system constructed by π–π and hydrogen‐bonding interactions

The title dicadmium compound, [Cd₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)₅(H₂O)₆](C₇H₆NO₂)₂(ClO₄)₂·2H₂O, is located around an inversion centre. Each Cd^II centre is coordinated by three N atoms from three different 4,4′‐bipyridine ligands and three O atoms from three coordinating water molecules in a distorted octahedral coordination environment. In the dicadmium cation unit, one 4,4′‐bipyridine (4,4′‐bipy) molecule acts as a bidentate bridging ligand between two Cd metal ions, while the other four 4,4′‐bipy molecules act only as monodentate terminal ligands, resulting in a rare `H‐type' [Cd₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)₅(H₂O)₆] host unit. These host units are connected to each other viaπ–π stacking interactions, giving rise to a three‐dimensional supramolecular grid network with large cavities. The 3‐aminobenzoate anions, perchlorate anions and water molecules are encapsulated in the cavities by numerous hydrogen‐bonding interactions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a coordination compound based on both 4,4′‐bipyridine ligands together with discrete 3‐aminobenzoate anions.     

Tris(2,2′‐bipyridine)ruthenium Derivatives with Multiple Viologen Acceptors: Quadratic Dependence of Photocatalytic H2 Evolution Rate on the Local Concentration of the Acceptor Site

Three Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ derivatives tethered to multiple viologen acceptors, [Ru(bpy)₂(4,4′‐MV2)]⁶⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(4,4′‐MV4)]¹⁰⁺, and [Ru(bpy)(4,4′‐MV4)₂]¹⁸⁺ [bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine, 4,4′‐MV2=4‐ethoxycarbonyl‐4′‐(N‐G₁‐carbamoyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine, and 4,4′‐MV4=4,4′‐bis(N‐G₁‐carbamoyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine, where G₁=Asp(NHG₂)‐NHG₂ and G₂=‐(CH₂)₂‐N⁺C₅H₄‐C₅H₄N⁺‐CH₃] were prepared as “photo‐charge separators (PCSs)”. Photoirradiation of these complexes in the presence of a sacrificial electron donor (EDTA) results in storage of electrons per PCS values of 1.3, 2.7, and 4.6, respectively. Their applications in the photochemical H₂ evolution from water in the presence of a colloidal Pt H₂‐evolving catalyst were investigated, and are discussed along with those reported for [Ru(bpy)₂(5,5′‐MV4)]¹⁰⁺, [Ru(4,4′‐MV4)₃]²⁶⁺, and [Ru(5,5′‐MV4)₃]²⁶⁺ (Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016 , 3, 671–680). The PCSs with high dimerization constants (K_d=10⁵–10⁶ m ^?1) are superior in driving H₂ evolution at pH 5.0, whereas those with lower K_d values (10³–10⁴ m ^?1) are superior at pH 7.0, where K_d=[(MV⁺)₂]/[MV^{+ .} ]². The (MV⁺)₂ site can drive H₂ evolution only at pH 5.0 as a result of its 0.15 eV lower driving force for H₂ evolution relative to MV^{+ .} , whereas the PCSs with lower K_d values exhibit higher performance at pH 7.0 owing to the higher population of free MV^{+ .} . Importantly, the rate of electron charging over the PCSs is linear to the apparent H₂ evolution rate, and shows an intriguing quadratic dependence on the number of MV²⁺ units per PCS.     

Taming Tin(IV) Polyazides

The first charge‐neutral Lewis base adducts of tin(IV) tetraazide, [Sn(N₃)₄(bpy)], [Sn(N₃)₄(phen)] and [Sn(N₃)₄(py)₂], and the salt bis{bis(triphenylphosphine)iminium} hexa(azido)stannate [(PPN)₂Sn(N₃)₆] (bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine; phen = 1,10‐phenanthroline; py = pyridine; PPN = N(PPh₃)₂) have been prepared using covalent or ionic azide‐transfer reagents and ligand‐exchange reactions. The azides were isolated on the 0.3 to 1 g scale and characterized by IR and NMR spectroscopies, microanalytical and thermal methods and their molecular structures determined by single‐crystal XRD. All complexes have a distorted octahedral Sn[N]₆ coordination geometry and possess greater thermal stability than their Si and Ge homologues. The nitrogen content of the adducts of up to 44 % exceed any Sn^IV compound known hitherto.     

Structural Diversity of Metallosupramolecular Assemblies from Cu(phen)2+ (phen = 1,10‐Phenanthroline) Building Blocks and 4,4′‐Bipyridine

Attempts to crystal engineer metallosupramolecularcomplexes from Cu(phen)²⁺ building blocks and the prototypical,rod‐like, exo‐bidentate ligand 4,4′‐bipyridine (4,4′‐bipy) by layering techniques are described. Reactions of Cu(phen)²⁺ (phen = 1,10‐phenanthroline) with 4,4′‐bipy in the presence of NO₃^– counterions yielded two distinct, discrete, dinuclear, C_i symmetric, dumbbell‐typecomplexes, [{Cu(NO₃)₂(phen)}₂(4,4′‐bipy)] ( 1 ) and [{Cu(NO₃)(phen)(H₂O)}₂(4,4′‐bipy)](NO₃)₂ ( 2 ), depending upon the mixture of solvents used for crystallization. In compound 1 , a mono‐ and a bidentate nitrato group coordinate to Cu²⁺, whereas in 2 the monodentate nitrato groups are replaced by aqua ligands, which introduce additional hydrogen‐bond donor functionality to the molecule. The crystal structure of 1 was determined by single‐crystal X‐ray analysis at 296 and 110 K. Upon cooling, a disorder‐order transition occurs, with retention of the space group symmetry. The crystal structure of 2 at room temperature was reported previously [Z.‐X. Du, J.‐X. Li, Acta Cryst. 2007 , E63, m2282]. We have redetermined the crystal structure of 2 at 100 K. A phase transition is not observed for 2 , but the low temperature single‐crystal structure determination is of significantly higher precision than the room temperature study. Both 1 and 2 are obtained phase‐pure, as proven by powder X‐ray diffraction of the bulk materials. Crystals of [Cu(phen)(CF₃SO₃)₂(4,4′‐bipy) · 0.5H₂O]_n ( 3 ), a one‐dimensional coordination polymer, were obtained from [Cu(CF₃SO₃)₂(phen)(H₂O)₂] and 4,4′‐bipy. In 3 , Cu(phen)²⁺ corner units are joined by 4,4′‐bipy via the two vacant cis sites to form polymeric zig‐zag chains, which are tightly packed in the crystal. Compounds 1 – 3 were further studied by infrared spectroscopy.     

Photosensitized Generation of Singlet Oxygen from (Substituted Bipyridine)ruthenium(II) Complexes

Photophysical properties in dilute MeCN solution are reported for seven Ru^II complexes containing two 2,2′‐bipyridine (bpy) ligands and different third ligands, six of which contain a variety of 4,4′‐carboxamide‐disubstituted 2,2′‐bipyridines, for one complex containing no 2,2′‐bipyridine, but 2 of these different ligands, for three multinuclear Ru^II complexes containing 2 or 4 [Ru(bpy)₂] moieties and also coordinated via 4,4′‐carboxamide‐disubstituted 2,2′‐bipyridine ligands, and for the complex [(Ru(bpy)₂(L)]²⁺ where L is N,N′‐([2,2′‐bipyridine]‐4,4′‐diyl)bis[3‐methoxypropanamide]. Absorption maxima are red‐shifted with respect to [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺, as are phosphorescence maxima which vary from 622 to 656 nm. The lifetimes of the lowest excited triplet metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer states ³MLCT in de‐aerated MeCN are equal to or longer than for [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ and vary considerably, i.e., from 0.86 to 1.71 μs. Rate constants k_q for quenching by O₂ of the ³MLCT states were measured and found to be well below diffusion‐controlled, ranging from 1.2 to 2.0⋅10⁹ dm³ mol⁻¹ s⁻¹. The efficiencies f of singlet‐oxygen formation during oxygen quenching of these ³MLCT states are relatively high, namely 0.53 – 0.89. The product of k_q and f gives the net rate constant k for quenching due to energy transfer to produce singlet oxygen, and k_q−k equals k, the net rate constant for quenching due to energy dissipation of the excited ³MLCT states without energy transfer. The quenching rate constants were both found to correlate with ΔG^CT, the free‐energy change for charge transfer from the excited Ru complex to oxygen, and the relative and absolute values of these rate constants are discussed.