Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears

Thresholds for the detection of temporal gaps were measured using two types of signals to mark the gaps: bandpass-filtered noises and sinusoids. The first experiment used seven subjects with relatively flat unilateral moderate cochlear hearing loss. The normal ear of each subject was tested both at the same sound-pressure level (SPL) as the impaired ear, and at the same sensation level (SL). Background noise was used to mask spectral "splatter" associated with the gap. For the noise markers, gap thresholds tended to be larger for the impaired ears than for the normal ears when the comparison was made at equal SPL; the difference was reduced, but not eliminated, when the comparison was made at equal SL. Gap thresholds for both the normal and impaired ears decreased as the center frequency increased from 0.5 to 2.0 kHz. For the sinusoidal markers, gap thresholds were often similar for the normal and impaired ears when tested at equal SPL, and were larger for the normal ears when tested at equal SL. Gap thresholds did not change systematically with frequency. Gap thresholds using sinusoidal markers were smaller than those using noise markers. In the second experiment, three subjects with single-channel cochlear implants were tested. Gap thresholds for noise bands tended to increase with increasing center frequency when the noise bandwidth was fixed, and to decrease with increasing bandwidth when the center frequency was fixed. Gap thresholds for sinusoids did not change with center frequency, but decreased markedly with increasing level. Gap thresholds for sinusoids were considerably smaller than those for noise bands.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects

Subjects with cochlear impairments often show reduced temporal resolution as measured in gap-detection tasks. The primary goals of these experiments were: to assess the extent to which the enlarged gap thresholds can be explained by elevations in absolute threshold; and to determine whether the large gap thresholds can be explained by the same processes that lead to a slower-than-normal recovery from forward masking. In experiment I gap thresholds were measured for nine unilaterally and eight bilaterally impaired subjects, using bandlimited noise stimuli centered at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kHz. Gap thresholds were usually larger for the impaired ears, even when the comparisons were made at equal sensation levels (SLs). Gap thresholds tended to increase with increasing absolute threshold, but the scatter of gap thresholds was large for a given degree of hearing loss. In experiment II threshold was measured as a function of the delay between the onset of a 210-ms masker and the onset of a 10-ms signal in both simultaneous- and forward-masking conditions. The signal frequency was equal to the center frequency of the bandlimited noise masker, which was 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 kHz. Five subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments, two subjects with bilateral impairments, and two normal subjects were tested. The rate of recovery from forward masking, particularly the initial rate, was usually slower for the impaired ears, even when the maskers were presented at equal SLs. Large gap thresholds tended to be associated with slow rates of recovery from forward masking.     

Relations among some psychoacoustic parameters in normal and cochlearly impaired listeners

Frequency resolution (viz., masking by low-pass-filtered noise and broadband noise) and temporal resolution (viz., masking by interrupted noise) were compared with hearing thresholds and acoustic reflex thresholds for four normally hearing and 13 cochlearly impaired subjects. Two models, one for frequency resolution (model I) and one for temporal resolution (model II), were introduced, and these provided a means of predicting individual frequency and temporal resolution from hearing thresholds for both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Model I is based on the assumption that the upward spread of masking increases in cochlearly impaired hearing with an amount proportional to the hearing threshold in dB HL. Model II is based on the assumption that the poststimulatory masked thresholds return to the level of the hearing threshold within a duration of 200 ms, independent of the level of the masker and the amount of cochlear hearing loss. Model parameters were determined from results from other studies. Although some discrepancies between measured and predicted values were observed, the model predictions generally agree with measurements. Thus, to a first-order approximation, it seems possible to predict individual frequency and temporal resolution of cochlearly hearing-impaired listeners solely on the basis of their hearing thresholds.     

A binaural analog of gap detection.

The temporal resolution of the binaural auditory system was measured using a binaural analog of gap detection. A binaural "gap" was defined as a burst of interaurally uncorrelated noise (Nu) placed between two bursts of interaurally correlated noise (N0). The Nu burst creates a dip in the output of a binaural temporal window integrating interaural correlation, analogous to the dip created by a silent gap in the output of a monaural temporal window integrating intensity. The equivalent rectangular duration (ERD) of the binaural window was used as an index of binaural temporal resolution. In order to derive the ERD, both the shortest-detectable binaural gap and the jnd for a reduction in interaural correlation from unity were measured. In experiment 1, binaural-gap thresholds were measured using narrow-band noise carriers as a function of center frequency from 250 to 2000 Hz (fixed 100-Hz bandwidth) and a function of lower-cutoff frequency from 100 to 400 Hz (fixed 500-Hz upper-cutoff frequency). Binaural-gap thresholds (1) increased significantly with increasing frequency in both tasks, and (2) at frequencies below 500 Hz, were shorter than corresponding silent-gap thresholds measured with the same N0 noises. In experiment 2, interaural-correlation jnd's were measured for the same conditions. The jnd's also increased significantly with increasing frequency. The results were analyzed using a temporal window integrating the output of a computational model of binaural processing. The ERD of the window varied widely across listeners, with a mean value of 140 ms, and did not significantly depend on frequency. This duration is about an order of magnitude longer than the ERD of the monaural temporal window and is, therefore, consistent with "binaural sluggishness."     

The detection of increments and decrements is not facilitated by abrupt onsets or offsets

Two experiments measured thresholds for the detection of increments and decrements in the intensity of a quasi-continuous broadband-noise (experiment 1) or increments in a 477-Hz pure-tone pedestal (experiment 2). A variety of onset and offset ramps for the intensity change were tested, from instantaneous onsets or offsets to ramps lasting several tens of milliseconds. For increments and decrements with equal duration, the characteristics of the ramps had little effect on performance. Abrupt rise times, which are associated with strong transient responses in auditory neurons, did not facilitate detection in comparison to much slower rise times. The temporal window model of temporal resolution provided a good account of the data when the decision statistic was the maximum magnitude of the change in the output of the window produced by the increment or decrement, but provided a poor account of the data when the decision statistic was the maximum rate of change in the output of the window over time. Overall the results suggest that, in the absence of cues in the audio-frequency domain, rapid changes in envelope contribute little to near-threshold increment or decrement detection.     

Comparing monaural and interaural temporal windows: effects of a temporal fringe on sensitivity to intensity differences

In an effort to provide a unifying framework for understanding monaural and binaural processing of intensity differences, an experiment was performed to assess whether temporal weighting functions estimated in two-interval monaural intensity-discrimination tasks could account for data in single-interval interaural intensity-discrimination tasks. In both tasks, stimuli consisted of a 50-ms burst of noise with a 5-ms probe segment at temporal positions ranging between the onset and offset of the overall stimulus. During the probe segment, one monaural interval or binaural channel of each trial contained an intensity increment and the other contained a decrement. Listeners were instructed to choose the interval/channel containing the increment. The pattern of monaural thresholds was roughly symmetrical (an inverted U) across temporal position of the probe but interaural thresholds were substantially higher for a brief time interval following stimulus onset. A two-sided exponential temporal window fit to the monaural data accounted for the interaural data well when combined with a post-onset-weighting function that described greatest weighting of binaural information at stimulus onset. A second experiment showed that the specific procedure used in measuring fringed interaural-intensity-difference-discrimination thresholds affects thresholds as a function of fringe duration and influences the form of the best-fitting post-onset-weighting function.     

The "overshoot" effect and sensory hearing impairment

The threshold for the detection of a brief tone masked by a longer-duration noise burst is higher when the tone is presented shortly after the onset of the noise than at longer delay times. This finding has been termed the "overshoot" effect [E. Zwicker, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 37, 653-663 (1965)]. The present letter compared the size of the effect in the better and more impaired ear of six subjects with high-frequency unilateral or asymmetric hearing losses of sensory origin. Thresholds were measured for 5-ms 4-kHz tones presented 10, 200, and 390 ms after the onset of a 400-ms, 2- to 8-kHz noise burst. The better ear of each subject was tested using two noise levels, one equal in sound-pressure level and one equal in sensation level to that used for the impaired ear. Thresholds for all subjects and all ears decreased monotonically with increasing delay time, with the size of the effect typically 5 dB. Thus a small overshoot effect was observed regardless of hearing impairment.     

Effects of non-simultaneous masking on the binaural masking level difference

The present study sought to clarify the role of non-simultaneous masking in the binaural masking level difference for maskers that fluctuate in level. In the first experiment the signal was a brief 500-Hz tone, and the masker was a bandpass noise (100-2000 Hz), with the initial and final 200-ms bursts presented at 40-dB spectrum level and the inter-burst gap presented at 20-dB spectrum level. Temporal windows were fitted to thresholds measured for a range of gap durations and signal positions within the gap. In the second experiment, individual differences in out of phase (NoSπ) thresholds were compared for a brief signal in a gapped bandpass masker, a brief signal in a steady bandpass masker, and a long signal in a narrowband (50-Hz-wide) noise masker. The third experiment measured brief tone detection thresholds in forward, simultaneous, and backward masking conditions for a 50- and for a 1900-Hz-wide noise masker centered on the 500-Hz signal frequency. Results are consistent with comparable temporal resolution in the in phase (NoSo) and NoSπ conditions and no effect of temporal resolution on individual observers' ability to utilize binaural cues in narrowband noise. The large masking release observed for a narrowband noise masker may be due to binaural masking release from non-simultaneous, informational masking.     

Temporal resolution and temporal masking properties of transient stimuli: data and an auditory model.

Temporal resolution is often measured using the detection of temporal gaps or signals in temporal gaps embedded in long-duration stimuli. In this study, psychoacoustical paradigms are developed for measuring the temporal encoding of transient stimuli. The stimuli consisted of very short pips which, in two experiments, contained a steady state portion. The carrier was high-pass filtered, dynamically compressed noise, refreshed for every stimulus presentation. The first experiment shows that, with these very short stimuli, gap detection thresholds are about the same as obtained in previous investigations. Experiments II and III show that, using the same stimuli, temporal-separation thresholds and duration-discrimination thresholds are better than gap-detection thresholds. Experiment IV investigates the significance of residual spectral cues for the listeners' performance. In experiment V, temporal separation thresholds were measured as a function of the signal-pip sensation level (SL) in both forward- and backward-masking conditions. The separation thresholds show a strong temporal asymmetry with good separation thresholds independent of signal-pip SL in backward-masking conditions and increasing separation thresholds with decreasing signal-pip SL in forward-masking conditions. A model of the auditory periphery is used to stimulate the gap-detection and temporal-separation thresholds quantitatively. By varying parameters like auditory-filter width and transduction time constants, the model provides some insight into how the peripheral auditory system may cope with temporal processing tasks and thus represents a more physiology-related complement to current models of temporal processing.     

Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments

The shape of the auditory filter was estimated at three center frequencies, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kHz, for five subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments. Additional measurements were made at 1.0 kHz using one subject with a unilateral impairment and six subjects with bilateral impairments. Subjects were chosen who had thresholds in the impaired ears which were relatively flat as a function of frequency and ranged from 15 to 70 dB HL. The filter shapes were estimated by measuring thresholds for sinusoidal signals (frequency f) in the presence of two bands of noise, 0.4 f wide, one above and one below f. The spectrum level of the noise was 50 dB (re: 20 mu Pa) and the noise bands were placed both symmetrically and asymmetrically about the signal frequency. The deviation of the nearer edge of each noise band from f varied from 0.0 to 0.8 f. For the normal ears, the filters were markedly asymmetric for center frequencies of 1.0 and 2.0 kHz, the high-frequency branch being steeper. At 0.5 kHz, the filters were more symmetric. For the impaired ears, the filter shapes varied considerably from one subject to another. For most subjects, the lower branch of the filter was much less steep than normal. The upper branch was often less steep than normal, but a few subjects showed a near normal upper branch. For the subjects with unilateral impairments, the equivalent rectangular bandwidth of the filter was always greater for the impaired ear than for the normal ear at each center frequency. For three subjects at 0.5 kHz and one subject at 1.0 kHz, the filter had too little selectivity for its shape to be determined.     

Detection of temporal gaps in bandlimited noise: effects of variations in bandwidth and signal-to-masker ratio

Thresholds were measured for the detection of a temporal gap in a bandlimited noise signal presented in a continuous wideband masker, using an adaptive forced-choice procedure. In experiment I the ratio of signal spectrum level to masker spectrum level (the SMR) was fixed at 10 dB and gap thresholds were measured as a function of signal bandwidth at three center frequencies: 0.4, 1.0, and 6.5 kHz. Performance improved with increasing bandwidth and increasing center frequency. For a subset of conditions, gap threshold was also measured as bandwidth was varied keeping the upper cutoff frequency of the signal constant. In this case the variation of gap threshold with bandwidth was more gradual, suggesting that subjects detect the gap using primarily the highest frequency region available in the signal. At low center frequencies, however, subjects may have a limited ability to combine information in different frequency regions. In experiment II gap thresholds were measured as a function of SMR for several signal bandwidths at each of three center frequencies: 0.5, 1.0, and 6.5 kHz. Gap thresholds improved with increasing SMR, but the improvement was minimal for SMRs greater than 12-15 dB. The results are used to evaluate the relative importance of factors influencing gap threshold.     

Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.

Thresholds of a 5-ms, 1-kHz signal were determined in the presence of a frozen-noise masker. The noise had a flat power spectrum between 20 Hz and 5 kHz and was presented with a duration of 300 ms. The following interaural conditions were tested with four listeners: Noise and signal monaural at the same ear (monaural condition, NmSm), noise and signal identical at both ears (diotic condition, NoSo), noise identical at both ears and signal monaural (dichotic condition, NoSm) and uncorrelated noise at the two ears and signal monaural (NuSm). The signal was presented at a fixed temporal position with respect to the frozen noise in all measurements and thresholds were determined for different starting phases of the carrier frequency of the signal. Variation of the carrier phase strongly influenced the detection in the diotic condition and the masked thresholds varied by more than 10 dB. The pattern of thresholds for the monaural condition was less variable and the thresholds were generally higher than for the diotic condition. The monaural-diotic difference for specific starting phases amounted to as much as 8 dB. Comparison measurements using running noise maskers revealed no such difference. This relation between monaural and diotic thresholds was further investigated with eight additional subjects. Again, monaural and diotic thresholds in running noise were identical, while in frozen noise, diotic thresholds were consistently lower than monaural thresholds, even when the ear with the lower NmSm threshold was compared. For the starting phase showing the largest monaural-diotic difference, the thresholds for NoSm lay between the monaural and the diotic values. At other starting phases, the NoSm threshold was clearly lower than both the NmSm and the NoSo threshold. One possible explanation of the observed monaural-diotic differences relates to contralateral efferent interaction between the right and the left hearing pathway. A prediction based on this explanation was verified in a final experiment, where frozen-noise performance for NmSm was improved by simultaneously presenting an uncorrelated running noise to the opposite ear.     

The role of frequency selectivity in measures of auditory and vibrotactile temporal resolution.

The purpose of this study was to compare the role of frequency selectivity in measures of auditory and vibrotactile temporal resolution. In the first experiment, temporal modulation transfer functions for a sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) 250-Hz carrier revealed auditory modulation thresholds significantly lower than corresponding vibrotactile modulation thresholds at SAM frequencies greater than or equal to 100 Hz. In the second experiment, auditory and vibrotactile gap detection thresholds were measured by presenting silent gaps bounded by markers of the same or different frequency. The marker frequency F1 = 250 Hz preceded the silent gap and marker frequencies after the silent gap included F2 = 250, 255, 263, 310, and 325 Hz. Auditory gap detection thresholds were lower than corresponding vibrotactile thresholds for F2 markers less than or equal to 263 Hz, but were greater than the corresponding vibrotactile gap detection thresholds for F2 markers greater than or equal to 310 Hz. When the auditory gap detection thresholds were transformed into filter attenuation values, the results were modeled well by a constant-percentage (10%) bandwidth filter centered on F1. The vibrotactile gap detection thresholds, however, were independent of marker frequency separation. In a third experiment, auditory and vibrotactile rate difference limens (RDLs) were measured for a 250-Hz carrier at SAM rates less than or equal to 100 Hz. Auditory RDLs were lower than corresponding vibrotactile RDLs for standard rates greater than 10 Hz. Combination tones may have confounded auditory performance for standard rates of 80 and 100 Hz. The results from these experiments revealed that frequency selectivity influences auditory measures of temporal resolution, but there was no evidence of frequency selectivity affecting vibrotactile temporal resolution.     

Psychophysical correlates of contralateral efferent suppression. I. The role of the medial olivocochlear system in "central masking" in nonhuman primates

An extensive physiological literature, including experimental and clinical studies in humans, demonstrates that activation of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent system, by either contralateral sound or electrical stimulation, can produce significant alterations in cochlear function and suggests a role for the MOC system in influencing the auditory behavior of binaural hearing. The present data are from psychophysical studies in nonhuman primates which seek to determine if the noted physiological changes in response to contralateral acoustic stimulation have a perceptual counterpart. Four juvenile Japanese macaques were trained to respond to the presence of 1-s sinusoids, presented to the test ear, in an operant reinforcement paradigm. Thresholds were compared for frequencies ranging from 1.0 to 4.0 kHz in quiet, with thresholds measured when continuous, two octave-band noise, centered on the test tone frequency, was presented in the contralateral ear. Contralateral noise was presented at levels of 10-60 dB above detection threshold for the test-tone frequency. While some variability was evident across subjects, both in the frequency distribution and magnitude (as a function of contralateral noise level), all subjects exhibited an increase, or suppression of thresholds in the presence of contralateral noise. On average, thresholds increased systematically with contralateral noise level, to a peak of 7 dB. In one subject, the threshold increase seen with contralateral noise was significantly reduced when the MOC was surgically sectioned on the floor of the IVth ventricle. The characteristics of the measured shifts in behavioral thresholds, in the presence of contralateral noise reported here, are qualitatively and quantitatively similar to both efferent physiological suppression effects and psychophysical central masking threshold shifts which have been reported previously. These data suggest that at least some aspects of "central masking" are efferent-mediated peripheral processes, and that the term "central masking" may be incorrect.     

Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment

The goal of this study was to determine the extent to which the difficulty experienced by impaired listeners in understanding noisy speech can be explained on the basis of elevated tone-detection thresholds. Twenty-one impaired ears of 15 subjects, spanning a variety of audiometric configurations with average hearing losses to 75 dB, were tested for reception of consonants in a speech-spectrum noise. Speech level, noise level, and frequency-gain characteristic were varied to generate a range of listening conditions. Results for impaired listeners were compared to those of normal-hearing listeners tested under the same conditions with extra noise added to approximate the impaired listeners' detection thresholds. Results for impaired and normal listeners were also compared on the basis of articulation indices. Consonant recognition by this sample of impaired listeners was generally comparable to that of normal-hearing listeners with similar threshold shifts listening under the same conditions. When listening conditions were equated for articulation index, there was no clear dependence of consonant recognition on average hearing loss. Assuming that the primary consequence of the threshold simulation in normals is loss of audibility (as opposed to suprathreshold discrimination or resolution deficits), it is concluded that the primary source of difficulty in listening in noise for listeners with moderate or milder hearing impairments, aside from the noise itself, is the loss of audibility.     

Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. II

Twenty-one sensorineurally hearing-impaired adolescents were studied with an extensive battery of tone-perception, phoneme-perception, and speech-perception tests. Tests on loudness perception, frequency selectivity, and temporal resolution at the test frequencies of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz were included. The mean values and the gradient across frequencies were used in further analysis. Phoneme-perception data were gathered by means of similarity judgments and phonemic confusions. Speech-reception thresholds were determined in quiet and in noise for unfiltered speech material, and with additional low-pass and high-pass filtering in noise. The results show that hearing loss for speech is related to both the frequency resolving power and temporal processing by the ear. Phoneme-perception parameters proved to be more related to the filtered-speech thresholds than to the thresholds for unfiltered speech. This finding may indicate that phoneme-perception parameters play only a secondary role, and for that reason their bridging function between tone perception and speech perception is only limited.     

Binaural modulation masking

Modulation thresholds were measured in three subjects for a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) wideband noise (the signal) in the presence of a second amplitude-modulated wideband noise (the masker). In monaural conditions (Mm-Sm) masker and signal were presented to only one ear; in binaural conditions (M0-S pi) the masker was presented diotically while the phase of modulation of the SAM noise signal was inverted in one ear relative to the other. In experiment 1 masker modulation frequency (fm) was fixed at 16 Hz, and signal modulation frequency (fs) was varied from 2-512 Hz. For monaural presentation, masking generally decreased as fs diverged from fm, although there was a secondary increase in masking for very low signal modulation frequencies, as reported previously [Bacon and Grantham, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 2575-2580 (1989)]. The binaural masking patterns did not show this low-frequency upturn: binaural thresholds continued to improve as fs decreased from 16 to 2 Hz. Thus, comparing masked monaural and masked binaural thresholds, there was an average binaural advantage, or masking-level difference (MLD) of 9.4 dB at fs = 2 Hz and 5.3 dB at fs = 4 Hz. In addition, there were positive MLDs for the on-frequency condition (fm = fs = 16 Hz: average MLD = 4.4 dB) and for the highest signal frequency tested (fs = 512 Hz: average MLD = 7.3 dB). In experiment 2 the signal was a SAM noise (fs = 16 Hz), and the masker was a wideband noise, amplitude-modulated by a narrow band of noise centered at fs. There was no effect on monaural or binaural thresholds as masker modulator bandwidth was varied from 4 to 20 Hz (the average MLD remained constant at 8.0 dB), which suggests that the observed "tuning" for modulation may be based on temporal pattern discrimination and not on a critical-band-like filtering mechanism. In a final condition the masker modulator was a 10-Hz-wide band of noise centered at the 64-Hz signal modulation frequency. The average MLD in this case was 7.4 dB. The results are discussed in terms of various binaural capacities that probably play a role in binaural release from modulation masking, including detection of varying interaural intensity differences (IIDs) and discrimination of interaural correlation.     

Comparisons of frequency selectivity in simultaneous and forward masking for subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments

Two experiments are described in which frequency selectivity was estimated, in simultaneous and forward masking, for each ear of subjects with moderate (25-60 dB HL) unilateral cochlear hearing losses. In both experiments, the signal level was fixed for a given ear and type of masking (simultaneous or forward), and the masker level was varied to determine threshold, using an adaptive, two-alternative forced-choice procedure. In experiment I, the masker was a noise with a spectral notch centered at the signal frequency (either 1.0 or 1.5 kHz); threshold was determined as a function of notch width. Signal levels were chosen so that the noise level required at threshold for a notch width of zero was similar for the normal and impaired ear of each subject in both simultaneous and forward masking. The function relating threshold to notch width had a steeper slope for the normal ear than for the impaired ear of each subject. For the normal ears, these functions were steeper in forward masking than in simultaneous masking. This difference was interpreted as resulting from suppression. For the impaired ears, significant differences in the same direction were observed for three of the five subjects, but the differences were smaller. In experiment II, psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) were determined in the presence of a fixed notched noise centered at the signal frequency (1.0 kHz). For the normal ears, the PTCs were sharper in forward masking than in simultaneous masking. For the impaired ears, the PTCs were similar in simultaneous and forward masking, but those in forward masking tended to be sharper at masker frequencies far removed from the signal frequency. Overall, the results suggest that suppression is reduced, but not completely absent in cases of moderate cochlear hearing loss.     

The shape of the ear's temporal window

This article examines the idea that the temporal resolution of the auditory system can be modeled using a temporal window (an intensity weighting function) analogous to the auditory filter measured in the frequency domain. To estimate the shape of the hypothetical temporal window, threshold was measured for a brief sinusoidal signal presented in a temporal gap between two bursts of noise. The duration of the gap was systematically varied and the signal was placed both symmetrically and asymmetrically within the gap. The data were analyzed by assuming that the temporal window had the form of a simple mathematical expression with a small number of free parameters. The values of the parameters were adjusted to give the best fit to the data. The analysis assumed that, for each condition, the temporal window was centered at the time giving the highest signal-to-masker ratio, and that threshold corresponded to a fixed ratio of signal energy to masker energy at the output of the window. The data were fitted well by modeling each side of the window as the sum of two rounded-exponential functions. The window was highly asymmetric, having a shallower slope for times before the center than for times after. The equivalent rectangular duration (ERD) of the window was typically about 8 ms. The ERD increased slightly when the masker level was decreased, but did not differ significantly for signal frequencies of 500 and 2000 Hz. The temporal-window model successfully accounts for the data from a variety of experiments measuring temporal resolution. However, it fails to predict certain aspects of forward masking and of the detection of amplitude modulation at high rates.     

Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold

The noise-excluding properties of a standard supra-aural audiometric earphone, a widely used circumaural-supra-aural combination, and an insert earphone sealed to the ear with a vinyl foam eartip were measured in a diffuse-field room complying with ANSI S12.6-1984. Data on attenuation were obtained monaurally with the nontest ear plugged and muffed. Results for the supra-aural earphones generally agreed well with previously reported measurements. A broadband masking noise was used to directly test the ANSI S3.1-1977 permissible background noise levels for measuring to audiometric zero using standard audiometric earphones. This "ANSI noise" raised the average thresholds of 15 normal-hearing test subjects by 3 to 5 dB at the octave frequencies from 500 to 4000 Hz. With a noise conforming to the less stringent OSHA-1983 regulation, average thresholds were elevated 9 to 17 dB. An "ENT office noise" with an overall sound level of 54 dBA raised average thresholds even further, by as much as 29 dB at 500 Hz. Use of the circumaural system in the office noise limited the threshold elevation to 11, 5, 2, and 0 dB at the four octave frequencies tested. With the fully ("deeply") inserted foam eartips, the threshold elevation in the simulated office noise was 2 dB or less at all test frequencies. Actual threshold elevations agreed closely with predictions based on a critical ratio calculation utilizing measured sound field noise levels and measured earphone attenuation values.